Will Russia be able to abandon oil and gas

6

Russia is beginning to transform itself in the wake of the rapidly changing world. Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin has appointed Deputy Prime Minister Andrei Belousov, the “right hand of Putin”, as the curator of the national energy transition process. Will our country be able to timely build a carbon neutral the economy, and what ways should you go for this?

It is clear that all this does not come from a good life. The Russian budget is critically dependent on the export of hydrocarbons and other raw materials, and in Europe and China, our main sales markets, they set a goal to bring the consumption of fossil fuels to zero by 2050 and 2060, respectively. It will be very soon, time will fly by, you will not have time to blink an eye, and the decline in consumption will begin much earlier and will only grow.



All serious


The logic of the EU, the USA and the PRC is clear: they are transferring their economies to renewable energy sources (RES), reducing carbon emissions into the atmosphere. However, this increases the costs of European, American and Chinese producers, who are forced to use more expensive "green" energy. To eliminate this injustice, Brussels, Washington and Beijing are ready to introduce the so-called "carbon tax" - additional payments that foreign exporters must make for the right to access these markets for their products, which have a high "carbon footprint" in their production. Thus, in theory, they should be equal in the level of costs with competitors, having lost an unreasonable advantage.

Unfortunately, Russia is among these exporters along with such countries as Ukraine, Algeria, Belarus, Albania, Turkey, Egypt and Morocco. The carbon footprint will be calculated both for direct emissions (scope category 1) and indirect (scope category 2), which are carbon emissions from the production of electricity, heat, components and raw materials at a particular enterprise. Those wishing to sell their products in the European, American and Chinese markets will have to buy special emission certificates.

At the first stage, Russian producers of cement, iron and steel, aluminum, fertilizers and electricity will suffer from the additional financial burden. What is much more unpleasant, in the future, the export of oil and gas, as well as the products of their processing, will fall under the "carbon tax". Taking into account the fact that our federal budget is critically dependent on the export of hydrocarbon raw materials, the “green initiative” poses a serious threat to Russia. And there’s nothing you can do, you have to somehow adapt. But how?

National energy transition


It should be noted that preparations for the transformation began some time ago. The federal authorities hastily formed specialized committees and held meetings behind closed doors. The fact that the matter is serious can be evidenced by the appointment of the project curator of the "Putin's hand" Andrei Belousov, who is also responsible for the "dispossession" of the Russian oligarchs.

The vice-premier figuratively compared the processes taking place in the world with the industrial revolution of the XNUMXth-XNUMXth centuries and scientifictechnical revolution of the second half of the XX century. According to him, the main directions of the government's activities will be: ensuring technological modernization of production, motivating businesses to switch to more environmentally friendly production, as well as the practical implementation of "green" climate initiatives in economic activities. Sounds good, but somewhat generalized. Let's try to imagine on our own what needs to be done in order for our country to successfully keep up with the times, and not remain forever among the catching up outsiders.

First of all, I would like to say a few words about renewable energy sources. The idea itself to stop depending on fossil fuels, the reserves of which are limited, is good, so the development of renewable energy should only be supported. The only question is what will be the share of "green" energy in the total energy balance. Recent events in Texas have shown that alternative sources of energy supply have very significant risks: the blades of wind turbines can become icy and stop spinning, or even be blown down by hurricane winds, solar panels can be covered with snow or damaged by sand, etc. This means that one cannot rely solely on "green" energy, replacing traditional energy with it. They should interact with each other, and renewable energy sources should not replace, but complement.

We also need to decide what exactly Russia needs green energy for: to become a truly carbon-neutral country or simply to maintain its share in foreign markets?

If the authorities need to stay on export markets, then they need to start building wind farms, installing solar panels, biogas plants and other sources of renewable energy sources in order to get enough green kilowatts to use them in industrial production and in the extraction and transportation of natural resources. This energy can be used both directly and indirectly, using it in the process of generating "green hydrogen", which will also be involved in the creation of carbon-neutral products. In principle, there is nothing fantastic here, you have to take it and do it, since these are the new rules of the game.

If we want to make our entire economy truly carbon neutral, then the task becomes incomparably more difficult. On the one hand, it will be necessary to consistently abandon coal generation with a transition to gas, as well as nuclear power. This is a good and right thing to do, but to get a convincing result, you need to carry out a large-scale gasification of your country, build a nuclear power plant in Russia, and not abroad. Something needs to be done in terms of phasing out transport with an internal combustion engine. But then what to change them for, for electric cars, which are a dead-end branch of evolution, or switch to gas as a fuel for cars? Rather, the second.

On the other hand, it would be nice to put things in order in our forestry, where millions of hectares of taiga burn out annually, emitting clouds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. To do this, it is necessary to restore the Federal Forestry Service, giving it the appropriate authority, material and technical base and funding, as well as begin the process of reviving the burned-out forests. By restoring the "lungs of the planet", Russia will make its significant contribution to the fight against global warming.
6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    22 September 2021 14: 48
    Last winter it was more profitable to sell its gas to the Russian Federation in Asia, where prices are higher, and on goods from the EU, the Russian Federation can impose its own protective duties ... Russia will survive this, but will Europe survive, having lost part of the market in the Russian Federation and supplies of relatively inexpensive gas from the Russian Federation, after all, the Russian Federation will not trade at a loss paying for prochida, and the Yankees already yesterday preferred to sell their LNG in Asia, in Washington they also know how to count money ...
  2. +1
    23 September 2021 08: 49
    For Russia to refuse oil and gas, the leadership needs to have smooth, green brains ...
  3. +4
    23 September 2021 22: 36
    I really hope that what the author wrote about the good of the so-called. green energy was sarcastic, because otherwise it is extremely sad. It is sad if someone writes seriously about a phenomenon that does not exist in nature. With the current development of science and technology, carbon-free whatever and created by man simply does not exist in nature. And Russia can really make an energy transition - the total use of the most perfect and, in fact, environmentally friendly source of energy - nuclear. Actually, apart from us all over the world, only France can do this (and it is much closer to this with its 60 +% share of nuclear energy than we are), but due to the dominance of green political prostitutes in the higher echelons of the EU, its chances are diminishing every year.
  4. 0
    30 September 2021 08: 50
    Why should we give up oil and gas? To get the same energy crisis as Geyropa, Tan, China and others like them? In another article on the same site (https://topcor.ru/21872-vmesto-zelenoj-revoljucii-mir-ozhidaet-masshtabnyj-jenergeticheskij-krizis.html) it is written about the consequences of the so-called. "decarbonization" ... Moreover, the true goal of this so-called. "decarbonization" is by no means saving the climate (which actually needs to be corrected, in the sense that the disgusting climate of the Arctic must (and should) be transformed into a subtropical one), but to drive as many countries as possible into the Stone Age ...
    1. 0
      30 September 2021 08: 53
      "tan" came out as a result of automatic moderation, by removing two syllables for Americans (pin) and (dos) ...
  5. 0
    30 September 2021 09: 31
    Russia does NOT need green energy! It is enough to set up the production of some goods that can work directly from the energy of the Sun, without intermediate electricity (only during the day in clear weather, but not only in summer, but also in spring and autumn, and in the southern regions and all year round): refrigerators, freezers, glaciers, baths , saunas, summer kitchens, heating systems, desalination, etc. (and not only for the domestic market, but also for export). This will lead to a significant reduction in electricity consumption worldwide, and as a result, to a reduction in fuel combustion and a decrease in the price of energy efficiency.