Russia refused to return "Buran"

10

NPO Molniya, the developer of the reusable spacecraft Buran, will not seek the return of the second flight model to Russia. This was reported by the press service of the research and production enterprise.

The experts came to the conclusion that this is not advisable.



Employees of our enterprise visited the Baikonur cosmodrome only in order to assess the technical condition of the structures in which the Buran spacecraft is located, its mockup and the mock-up of the Energia-M launch vehicle

- said in a statement.

NPO noted that the second flight prototype and the prototype of the Energia-M launch vehicle located at the Baikonur cosmodrome are not the property of the Russian enterprise.

NPO Molniya has no plans to transport them.

- the representatives of NGOs put an end to the question.

Former head of Roscosmos Dmitry Rogozin сообщил about the deplorable state of the second flight model "Buran" and laid all the responsibility for this on the Kazakh owner.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    9 September 2021 19: 26
    Here, let this shepherd build a yurt in the Buran building.
  2. 0
    9 September 2021 21: 03
    More money Russia has nowhere to go, how to keep a sacred tin can in a museum ??? Roscosmos would be better off doing direct tasks and not totems.
  3. +3
    9 September 2021 21: 03
    How lightning fast everything changes. Three days ago, "Lightning" had completely different plans.
    https://topcor.ru/21485-legendarnyj-buran-budet-vozvraschen-v-rossiju.html
    In our country, just like in Ukraine, at first "peremoga" is announced, and then "zrada" is stated.
    1. +1
      10 September 2021 11: 02
      Quote: greenchelman
      How lightning fast everything changes. Three days ago, "Lightning" had completely different plans.

      Most likely, everything was as it is written in this article, and everything else was thought out by the journalist. Indeed, even in the NGO statement he cited, not a word was said about transportation. Quote from the article for 6.09:

      Representatives of the NGO Molniya visited the Baikonur cosmodrome. The purpose of the trip was to inspect the Buran orbital ship and its technological layout, as well as the hangar (assembly and refueling complex at site 112A), where products are stored

      After that, there was a gag and fantasies on the topic of disassembly and transportation
  4. -2
    9 September 2021 23: 27
    Yes, in the news on the 6th, everything was said exactly the opposite.
    Maybe they just wanted to take it for a raider.
  5. 0
    10 September 2021 05: 20
    They did not agree on the price. And so from the very beginning it was clear that it was unnecessary. All the technologies, documentation, and so on in Russia.
  6. -1
    10 September 2021 08: 56
    Well, everything is like with the Ukrainian gas pipe. First, the Kazakhs broke the price for something that did not belong to them from the word "at all". And now, when the device becomes unusable due to unreasonable storage, they scratch their turnips. A little more time and they will agree to sell it like scrap metal. Because no one in particular will need it anymore. New technologies are coming and this device can only become a symbol, like "Aurora".
  7. 0
    10 September 2021 16: 52
    Why Rogozin realized after 30 years
  8. -1
    10 September 2021 20: 06
    Russia refused to return "Buran"

    - an interesting alignment. As far as we know, the Kazakhs simply did not give it away.
  9. 0
    10 September 2021 20: 36
    Well, there is nothing to return there, since the owner of "Buran" was some kind of private entrepreneur. Everything fell into disrepair