Russia risks losing the largest fresh water reservoir in the world

13

We continue the unhappy series of publications about large-scale environmental problems in the post-Soviet space, their causes and how they can and should be dealt with. The rivers Dnieper, Volga and Don have already received our attention, and, alas, Baikal will now be on this list. The Great Russian Lake is in danger, and it is not possible to help it so easily. Why, in spite of the measures taken, is Baikal rapidly approaching the status of a full-fledged ecological catastrophe?

What is Baikal? This is the largest and deepest lake in the world, which contains from 20% to 22% of all fresh water reserves on the planet. It is deservedly included in the UNESCO List of Natural World Heritage Sites. The main resource of the great lake is its water, unique in its purity, which once could have been drunk just like that, without fear of any negative consequences. Alas, now the affairs of Lake Baikal are far from being so rosy. In some places, the water in the lake turned into a muddy yellow slurry with a foul smell, and one of the rivers flowing into it, called Modonkul, changed its color to orange. Who is to blame and what to do?



In the philistine consciousness, the problems of Lake Baikal are primarily associated either with the pulp and paper mill (PPM), which, by the way, has long been closed, or with tourists, primarily Chinese. But the reality is much more complicated.

PPM


The plant on the shores of Lake Baikal was opened in 1966. The enterprise actively used its water in pulp and paper production, and then poured industrial waste into it. Air emissions also played a negative role, which is usually not remembered. Such economic activities caused colossal environmental damage to the great lake, and the pulp and paper mill was either closed or started up again. Even the installation of equipment for closed water circulation did not solve the problem, and in 2013 the enterprise was finally closed. Unfortunately, even a closed pulp and paper mill continues to harm the environment. The fact is that as a result of its work, about 6,5 million tons of liquid and solid waste have accumulated. They are stored in 12 special containers, storage cards, and await their turn for disposal, which must be carried out by the state corporation Rosatom until 2024. But when the storage facilities overflow with sediment, toxic streams begin to flow from them directly into the nearby lake. In addition, there are fears that the tightness of the storage cards could be broken, since the area is earthquake-prone. In places located near the pulp and paper mill, the concentration of hazardous substances in water exceeds the standards by 10-30 times.

Industrials


The main pollution of the lake is the Selenga River, which flows into Baikal and comes to us from Mongolia. This country of endless steppes and horse-drawn warriors is one of the worst polluters of the lake. Large industrial centers in northern Mongolia dump waste from construction plants, a steel mill, a tannery, food processing enterprises, gold and other minerals mining enterprises into the water. But let's not sin only on our neighbors. Within a radius of 200 kilometers from Lake Baikal, there are a lot of domestic enterprises of thermal power engineering, coal, mining, aluminum, chemical and other industries in large cities, for example, the Irkutsk-Cheremkhovsky industrial hub. Even the closed Dzhida tungsten-molybdenum plant poisons the water.

Wastewater


Large Russian cities of Buryatia and the Trans-Baikal Territory, for example, Ulan-Ude, as well as the capital of Mongolia, Ulan Bator, contribute to the pollution of Baikal. Treatment facilities are often in disrepair, and in small settlements and summer cottages they may be completely absent. In addition to sewage, pesticides and other fertilizers and chemical treatments for plants of agricultural complexes get into rivers and lakes. Wastewater and oil products are discharged from ships into lake water. Because of this, it begins to bloom, and the toxic bacteria Spirogyra actively multiply in it, which leads to the death of entire species, disrupting the ecological balance. Drinking such water, scooping it up with glasses, is definitely not worth it.

Tourists


And, yes, tourists, foreign and Russian, equally contribute to the pollution of the environment. Hotels that make money on guests, as a rule, are not equipped with an autonomous closed sewerage system, draining wastewater into Baikal, which will endure everything. Everyone is well aware of how vacationers can behave in nature and how much garbage they leave behind. Sergei Ivanov, the representative of the President of the Russian Federation on environmental protection, ecology and transport, even spoke out in the spirit of the need to completely stop or limit tourism on Lake Baikal:

If we want to preserve the uniqueness of Baikal and its purity, we need to do something with the flow of people.

Thus, the ecological problems of Lake Baikal are of a complex international nature, and therefore there are no simple solutions here. But this does not mean that nothing can be done. Nature itself gave Russia 22% of all the world's purest fresh water, and we must take all possible measures to preserve them in close cooperation with all interested parties.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    30 July 2021 16: 53
    If something needs to be done with Lake Baikal, then it is necessary to carry out a comprehensive environmental examination of both lakes and rivers that replenish the Baikal basin with the involvement of scientists and establish from what it is polluted. Then it will be possible to purify the water and take measures, including perhaps with a small admission of tourists to Baikal.
  2. -5
    30 July 2021 18: 03
    They said they were green. nature lovers and Greenpeace people are all agents of the State Department. Swinging for sacred ... for business ...

    If the waste is poured, it means that it is profitable for someone ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 0
    30 July 2021 23: 37
    I would never have thought that the valley of the Selenga River with a population of under 200 thousand horse-drawn people can be compared with an agglomeration of the RUR type.
    1. +1
      31 July 2021 04: 16
      You should at least open the map for a start and turn on the brain. Well, it's a shame to talk nonsense.
  5. +2
    31 July 2021 00: 45
    Nature itself gave Russia 22% of all the world's purest fresh water, and we must take all possible measures to preserve them in close cooperation with all interested parties.

    I do not observe "interested parties".
    With the exception of the commercial structure of Greenpeace, which regularly fulfills the orders of interested parties.

    PS To the author of the article, big greetings from Evgenia Chirikova, the former "protector" of the Khimki forest, who now oversees the "environmental problems of Russia" from .... Estonia.

    1. +1
      31 July 2021 09: 11
      Quote: Ulysses
      PS To the author of the article, big greetings from Evgenia Chirikova, the former "protector" of the Khimki forest, who now oversees the "environmental problems of Russia" from .... Estonia.

      Well, what is this passage supposed to mean? the author lied about the problems of Lake Baikal? Are there any rules on Lake Baikal?
      the author sits on grants from Greenpeace?
      what do you think the author wants? Shake the ecological boat?
      1. 0
        31 July 2021 23: 35
        Well, what is this passage supposed to mean? the author lied about the problems of Lake Baikal? Are there any rules on Lake Baikal?
        the author sits on grants from Greenpeace?
        what do you think the author wants? Shake the ecological boat?

        The author apparently does not know that Baikal is an internal reservoir of Russia, when he declares on a blue eye:

        Thus, the ecological problems of Lake Baikal are complex. международний nature.

        These are our and only our problems.

        The author will give examples of when Greenpeace's intervention solved a serious environmental problem in Russia ??

        PS I suggest that the author, together with "international stakeholders", publish here weekly articles on the state of the chemical dump in the Baltic Sea.
        Created not by the USSR and not by Russia.
        To me from Kaliningrad this much closer.


        https://newizv.ru/article/general/20-04-2021/himicheskiy-arsenal-na-dne-baltiki-v-rossii-znayut-kak-izbezhat-globalnoy-katastrofy
  6. +1
    31 July 2021 13: 15
    It's amazing: you can't even hear Greenpeace's Greenpeople ...
    Then, because of completely incomprehensible little things, they raise a noise to the whole world, but here there is silence ...
    But after N number of years it will be possible to accuse Russia of being able to dirtiest or destroy 22% of the world's fresh water reserves ...
    But in principle ... I will not even touch on large cities and industrial complexes ... In villages and small towns, what, someone will build modern sewerage systems and water treatment facilities ??? request
  7. +1
    31 July 2021 14: 20
    Nightmare...)))
    What is Putin doing ... Horror ... Gyyyy)))
  8. +1
    31 July 2021 14: 43
    I am driving along Lake Baikal, now, muddy water, where?
  9. +2
    31 July 2021 18: 01
    all this ecology is always written by amateurs. For 40 years I have heard that Baikal is dying. For water bodies, a scale of six classes has been developed, ranging from clean and extremely dirty. Where are the numbers?
  10. -1
    31 July 2021 21: 39
    Don't bother Chirikov! McFaul promised, did. Zhituhu in Estonia.
  11. +1
    9 August 2021 03: 48
    With the collapse of the USSR, environmental problems worsened throughout Russia and we owe these inhabitants of the Kremlin, who follow the lead of crooks like Chubais, who believe that the bazaar, which they call the market, will settle everything itself. Yes, it will not settle down, if you do not put things in order in the market