Continuing the fight against Nord Stream 2 will be Ukraine's fatal mistake

11

The details and details of the deal concluded by Washington and Berlin on the future fate of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, announced publicly, quite predictably produced the effect of an exploding bomb in Kiev. "Happy joy!" and "Biden handed us over with all the giblets!" - these are also the most restrained and censorship examples of the reaction of the local "true patriots" to the stunning news... A particularly depressing impression on them was made by the White House's demand for the authorities to "sit still and not blather" after the announcement of the deal, voiced by the American media. The State Department seems to have denied this fact, but the sediment, as they say, remained.

They asked Zelensky and the company to come to terms with the inevitable and take what they give or not (although, most likely, something like this still took place), but today promises from Kiev are already being heard "not to lay down arms" and "to continue the decisive struggle" against the hated pipeline. Moreover, such things are heard, including from the lips of quite official representatives of the country, in particular, from its Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Let's try to figure out what are the real chances of Ukraine for success in the confrontation it continues, contrary to logic, common sense and the insistent advice of its “senior comrades”, and where it may ultimately lead it.



The main thing is in the details


Before judging who won and who lost as a result of the American-German agreement - the United States, Russia, Germany or Ukraine, it is necessary to carefully familiarize yourself not with its general meaning (rather vague, by the way), but with the details, with so that, so to speak, "read between the lines." Here, for a start, one should pay attention to the fact that the versions of the agreements reached, as set forth by the German Foreign Ministry and the US State Department, are somewhat different. Not that it is very important, but let's say, it is significant. The point here is, first of all, in the only, in fact, "bonus" that seems to be due to Kiev after the launch of SP-2 - the creation of a kind of "Green Fund of Ukraine", which should contribute to its "transition to environmentally friendly energy sources", as well as " ensuring its energy independence and security ”.

Here, in general, it can be understood in very different ways - in particular, as the intention of the "Western partners" to conduct a kind of experiment on the global rejection of the use of fossil fuels on the territory of the "non-railway". "We will give you some money and see if you can live on solar panels and biogas alone!" - something like this. By the way, about money. There is a feeling that Berlin is firmly convinced that it is up to the stakeholders on both sides of the Atlantic to invest in this business (or, if you prefer, "attract investments of up to $ 1 billion"). Germany is ready to "make an initial contribution" of $ 175 million, but not to carry the entire greening project on itself. In Washington (judging by the statements of the State Department), they adhere to a radically different point of view - since the Germans need Nord Stream 2 so much, let them pay for everything! In their "performance", Berlin's infusion into the "Green Fund" was announced in the amount of 200 million euros at once and in the same billion dollars later. The inconsistency.

Moreover, it is on the German side that the most "honorable" mission is entrusted - to "twist the arms" of Moscow so that it agrees in 2024 to continue the Ukrainian transit for 10 years. And on the next, to put it mildly, inadequate conditions of Kiev, one must assume. How exactly Berlin should achieve such an incredible result is not specified. It is said: "using all available levers." And they, generally speaking, are there, these levers ?! It is not for nothing that the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Sergei Lavrov, simply ridiculed this point: "Yes, you know, Germany is strong ..." This is just plain mockery - and it serves it right. By the way, the same can be said about the threats “to impose anti-Russian sanctions in the event” if “Moscow uses gas supplies as a weapon to achieve aggressive political goals ". And how, excuse me, the Germans have to define this ?! Okay, “the commission of new aggressive actions against Ukraine” is specific. And the rest? And here's what else is extremely interesting: how will they "punish" us? "Restrictions on the possibilities of energy exports to Europe", as stated in the statement of the German Foreign Ministry?

Well, well, it is very interesting to see how it will look, say, in the month of January, but at an air temperature of -20 degrees, which is extreme frost for the Old World. To spite Putin's ears freeze? Go for it. Something suggests that the German government, which decides to arrange a "cold sea" for its own citizens in the name of "saving the young Ukrainian democracy" will not hold out in power for a very short time. By and large, the plans and projects promulgated by Washington and Berlin to "unconditionally preserve Ukrainian transit" and "support its European path" are nothing more than a set of common phrases, empty declarations about their readiness to "fight for all good against all bad" and the most common "Puffing up the cheeks".

"We have many questions for you ..."


This is how the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry reacted to the official announcement of the Nord Stream 2 deal. Its head, Dmitry Kuleba said that Kiev intends to “study it very carefully economic part ", as well as all issues related to the" security "of Ukraine after the gas pipeline goes into operation. On the first point, in general, it is clear - the promised (seemingly) money is not enough. Well, there are always few of them "non-profit". As for "security", which, according to Kuleba, his country intends to "seriously talk" with both the United States and Germany, then she can talk. The question is, will someone listen to all this? The same Joe Biden clearly and unequivocally said that "it was already impossible to stop the 99% completed pipeline."

The official statement of the White House regarding the timing of the proposed visit of Vladimir Zelensky to Washington indicates that they intend to accept him there according to the most expedited and simplified procedure, solely for the purpose of complete and final enlightenment. At the same time, Biden also insures itself against possible attempts by the scandalous comedian to "raise the boom" for the same reason - on August 30 (a meeting is scheduled for that day) Congress will be on vacation, political life in the US capital will freeze and express his "deep indignation at the surrender Ukrainian interests "Zelensky can only in front of members of the" diaspora "and his own reflection in the mirror. By the way, American lawmakers, who are eager to arrange "sleeping Joe" for his refusal to continue the struggle against SP-2, have already noticed this detail and are terribly indignant. Especially the frantic Ted Cruz, who went down in his vilification of Biden to outright obscenity and obscenity.

It is not for nothing that the speaker of the Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada, after the deal was concluded, tried to appeal not to the White House, but to Congress, where he sent a corresponding dispatch addressed to his colleague, Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi. The content of this message is so delusional that there is no point in citing it widely - all the same lamentations about the "mortal threat to the national interests and security of the United States, Europe and Ukraine", which the SP-2 allegedly poses and the impudent demands "to prevent commissioning" this "Putin's energy weapon". It must be said that Yuriy Vitrenko, the head of NJSC Naftogaz, undertakes to assert that Kiev has "powerful bicameral support" in the US Congress, allowing "to continue the struggle with the help of all available tools." It is unlikely that this is true, but Biden, as we can see, is insured just in case. This alone is more than eloquent testimony to the fact that he considers the issue of Nord Stream 2 closed at the moment. It is not at all excluded that Washington will later return to it, trying in one way or another to spoil the blood of both RAO Gazprom and Russia as a whole.

However, for the White House now, it is much more important to consolidate European allies to fight China. Well, and Berlin, to all appearances, has managed to make the completion and launch of the gas pipeline a priority, which it will not compromise under any circumstances. The rules of the game will be explained to Zelensky in the White House once again (most likely the last), and if he decides to blather something about a “pivot to the East” or similar nonsense, he will most likely emerge from there as a former president. He has clearly gone over the norm for vybryk and attempts at blackmail, and each new "drop" may turn out to be the last in the far from bottomless bowl of patience of the Americans, who are accustomed to changing Ukrainian "leaders" like gloves.

Of course, the only reasonable thing that Kiev could do in this situation is to stop pretending to be "offended innocence" and at least try to start to establish normal relations with Moscow - for the same preservation of gas transit through its GTS after 2024. However, one can hardly count on such things. Among Ukrainian politicians, for the most part, there are calls to “put even more pressure on Western partners”, trying to “shame” them for their perfect “betrayal” and on this to snatch any preferences. The most alternatively gifted “patriots” dream of absolutely fantastic options like “freezing” Ukraine's payments on its colossal foreign debt, obtaining the status of a priority military ally outside NATO from the United States, or even convening some kind of “international conference of the countries that signed the Budapest Memorandum”. Those, obviously, will have to declare war on Russia ...

Continuing to be in captivity of illusions that do not correspond to reality at all about their "importance" and "value" for the West, Ukrainian politicians and government officials do not want to admit the obvious - the "vital interests" of the "unnecessary" that are pretty boring for everyone, absolutely none of its "partners" care and do not care. In Kiev, they can be indignant as much as they want with the fact that the Nord Stream 2 issue was resolved without any participation of the Ukrainian side, but, apparently, from now on it will be so and only so. The time will come - and in exactly the same way everything will happen with Donbass, if only the variant of the solution suits Moscow. Any attempts by representatives of the Ukrainian authorities to change the situation will only lead to the fact that each next proposal that they will receive from the West will be stingier and worse than the previous one. Or to change this very power exactly until it stops “pumping rights” and creating problems for states that really mean something on a geopolitical scale.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    23 July 2021 12: 22
    Ukraine and Europe are interested in gas transit. But not Russia. Ukraine does not need hundreds of millions of dollars, but 1,5-2,0 billion a year. Plus the transit itself to simulate reverse. In principle, the problem is solvable.
    Gas is sold at the Russia-Ukraine border. This requires some technical solutions, but they are unlikely to be large financially. And the transit itself is paid by the final consumer. That is Europe. Russia will sell gas at market prices, minus transit costs. That is, at the price of a hub in Holland (in strict accordance with the decision of the Stockholm arbitration tribunal).
    The problem is that no one wants to take Ukraine for their maintenance. Moreover, the transit country is more than unreliable.
    1. +2
      23 July 2021 21: 03
      Ukraine and Europe are interested in gas transit. But not Russia.

      Hmm .. I have a fear that the Americans (and others like them) are up to something very bad. Please note - there is a very ambiguous situation:

      The Americans suddenly found an opportunity to come to an agreement with Germany on SP2, knowing full well that the role of Ukraine as a "transit country" for gas is likely to end there.

      But in this case (Plan B?), At the same time another, ominous opportunity opens up (fulfilling the long-standing dream of the "Anglo-Saxons") - finally, nothing any longer prevents the Ukrainians from directly confronting Russia in an open military conflict.

      The EU countries will, through the "northern streams", as if nothing had happened, regularly receive under the contract, Russian gas, while Russia itself will wage a fierce war against Ukraine, stuffed with weapons supplied by the same "west ".

      As a result, the Americans have what they wanted:
      - the weakening of belligerent Russia, plus profits from the sale of arms to Ukraine.
      - The Europeans get what they needed - Russian gas, at the same time not forgetting to "earn extra money" on the same arms sale.

      That is, as they say: the wolves are fed and the sheep are safe.

      And what will Russia get, in this case? (I'm not even talking about Ukraine - ruins?)
      1. 0
        23 July 2021 21: 27
        ... But in this case (Plan B?), At the same time, another, ominous opportunity opens up (fulfilling the long-standing dream of the "Anglo-Saxons") - finally, nothing any longer prevents the Ukrainians from directly confronting Russia in an open military conflict ...

        They understand better than you that this is a loss of the country, which they MUST cherish like the apple of their eye for the constant stirring of Russia in the most uncomfortable situations for it. Moreover, both the Poles and the Czechs will not stand aside, tearing away for themselves what they consider to be theirs. There will be no other opportunity for them. You can blame everything, even your own acquisitions of Lvov, and so on, on Russia.
        1. +1
          23 July 2021 23: 47
          They understand better than you that this is a loss of the country, which they MUST cherish like the apple of their eye for the constant stirring of Russia

          Well, so they took care of it, this country, just for such an occasion?

          But simply, for the "constant stirring" they have other tools ... sanctions, for example, "courts-tribunals" all sorts, etc.

          It will simply be destroyed.

          How do you imagine this destruction?
  2. 0
    23 July 2021 21: 22
    Quote: Bakht
    Ukraine and Europe are interested in gas transit ..

    Clarification is required here. Who is Europe? Nord Streams 1, 2, plus South Stream, plus Norwegian gas, albeit decreasing in volume ..... Southern Europe with gas. Germany not only with gas, but also becomes a transit country itself. So, Ukraine and Poland are interested in transit through Ukraine. How do you like this:
    https://zen.yandex.ru/media/dbk/evrokomissiia-priravniala-ekologichnost-aes-k-solnechnovetrovoi-energetike-604f54f6d3283e6cff9f0347
    Has the European Commission equated nuclear energy with clean, green? A return to nuclear power will solve all the problems that will increase with the increasing demand for energy after the virus.
    1. +1
      23 July 2021 22: 02
      Gas is not only power generation. This is also the raw material for many goods.
  3. 0
    24 July 2021 08: 53
    Quote Dear sofa expert. How do you imagine this destruction?

    And how do you imagine its further existence, if it becomes rabid and begins to destroy the Russians in the LPNR, or will it begin to conduct military operations against Russia, in the Crimea, or on the Sea of ​​Azov? We will deal with it not in the Council of Europe, but in the fields of Ukraine. Fast and incredibly effective.
    1. +2
      24 July 2021 10: 31
      How do you imagine its further existence

      Not yet, I can’t imagine.

      I asked you this question.

      here you say:

      .. just destroy ..

      "Simple", how's that?
      Will they wipe everything off the face of the earth with weapons of mass destruction?

      I admit that it is easier to do this with any other country, including even the United States, than with the territory immediately adjacent to Russia, with all the historical, geographical, and what can I say, somewhere very close family ties with Russia.

      It's no secret that a huge number of ethnic Russians live on the territory of today's Ukraine. The ratio to other nationalities is also different in different areas, but there are many of them. You don't want to destroy them all at the same time, do you?

      Russians are killing Russians !? Well, this is exactly what the Anglo-Saxons expect from us! And this is what they all lead to.

      So “just” doesn't work anymore.

      That is why I asked you, how do you imagine it?
      1. 0
        24 July 2021 11: 26
        Civil war in hours will spread to the entire territory of Ukraine. Poland would HAVE to take its Lviv. There will be no other case. And with nuclear weapons, Russia would keep at a distance all those who ..... Believe me, no infection will stand up for the Nazis. The Turks have convinced HOW NATO helps its own? What was the response to Erdogan when he rushed to Washington for protection? And the country will never join NATO. They- not crazy. like these natsiks. They have a lot to lose.
        1. +1
          24 July 2021 12: 27
          Believe me, not a single infection will stand up for the Nazis.

          And no one asserts this.

          On the contrary, they will even stir up this conflict. Provocations, ideological support, the supply of weapons, the subsequent artificial creation of negative "public opinion" against Russia.

          This has already been successfully tested in Afghanistan, against the USSR, in Chechnya and partly in Georgia - already against Russia.

          And kraina will never join NATO

          Naturally it won't. The alliance needs it more as a "buffer zone" in a possible future theater of operations, so as not to have direct territorial contact with the enemy in the person of Russia. Waging a war "remotely", "hybrid" (that is, by foreign forces) is less costly, and quite effective.

          I think that the "West" has already greatly regretted having accepted the countries of the "Tribaltic" into NATO. There, geographically, there is not even the necessary tactical depth for defense. This is a very weak link in the structure of the alliance, its (growing) headache, so to speak.

          The same hysteria today is with Belarus. The West, and in particular - Poland, is right "across the ass" if the Belarusians unite into one state with Russia.

          Then Poland, like today's Ukraine, will automatically turn into a kind of "buffer zone" for the rest of the alliance members. In a hypothetical potential future battlefield, so to speak .. that's why the Poles and hysteria more than others.
  4. +1
    24 July 2021 23: 27
    It should not be underestimated that the West will defend Ukraine's interests to the end. For many reasons. If anything happened to Ukraine, it would be their loss. In addition, Hitler planned to include Ukraine in the countries under German rule. Not allowed. Ukraine wanted this even then, it was not in vain that the statements that they fought on the wrong side slipped through. Ukraine will never turn in our direction. Unless a miracle happens and the Russian economy outstrips the German one. Therefore, you need to react harshly. But sly. It is necessary to make sure that in each case they are made fools and that they suffer damage.