Photos of the new Russian combat aircraft published on the Web

July 16 2021 47

On the eve of the MAKS-21 international air show, an image of a new Russian combat aircraft, which will be shown on the first day of the exhibition, got into social networks. The aircraft is covered with a cover, so it is very difficult to see the details of the exterior.

Alexei Leonkov, a military expert for the Arsenal of the Fatherland magazine, believes that the latest tactical single-engine fighter of the fifth generation, created by the Sukhoi design bureau, is hidden under the cover.

The contours of the aircraft, its keel, and landing gear design indicate that it is a lightweight fifth-generation fighter of the Sukhoi family.

- suggested the specialist in an interview RIA News.

New lightweight single-engine Russian fighter.

Photo: Ivan Novikov-Dvinsky pic.twitter.com/QoAMEMAdp7
- GodnotA (@mahmud_aheli) July 16, 2021

The 2021 International Aviation and Space Salon will be held from July 20 to 25 in the Moscow Region town of Zhukovsky at the airfield of the Gromov Flight Research Institute. This year the significant event will take place for the 15th time.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

zzdimk

+5

16 July 2021 17: 48

Very interesting, what are they hiding there?
1. aries2200
  
  0
  
  24 July 2021 17: 47
  
  fig for the pentagon with oil ..................
Cyril

-10

16 July 2021 18: 21

I wonder if the local jingoistic patriots will shout that "the plane is de-ugly", or that "some kind of fat has turned out", "Not an airplane, but a fat penguin"?

Because the profile is almost one in one F-35.
1. chemurij
  
  +7
  
  16 July 2021 18: 32
  
  Quote: Cyril
  Because the profile is almost one in one F-35.
  
  The SU-57 is one-to-one in profile, look more closely at the photos, there is only one engine, and I am more than sure that most of the fighter's airframe will be made of the same parts as that of the SU-57, as well as electronics and everything else inherent in it. It's simple, here the SU-57 was taken as a basis.
  1. Cyril
    
    -3
    
    16 July 2021 18: 42
    
    Unlike the Su-57, this aircraft is noticeably shorter and sturdier. Compare the profile of this aircraft and the F-35 in terms of length-to-thickness ratio - they are almost the same.
    1. chemurij
      
      +4
      
      16 July 2021 18: 53
      
      Quote: Cyril
      Compare the profile of this aircraft and the F-35 in terms of length-to-thickness ratio - they are almost the same.
      
      This is a single-engine aircraft, so it should be lighter, a natural solution to reduce the glider in length, to reduce the fuel supply (there is only one engine), but its shape is the same as that of the SU-57, and it remains, look at the bends, descents of the skin from the cockpit downwards, as well as the lower part of the airframe, like the SU-57. The penguin is almost hump on top, below it has a large chin, like the lower part of a pelican's beak.
      1. Cyril
        
        -1
        
        16 July 2021 23: 59
        
        The penguin is almost hump on top, below it has a large chin, like the lower part of a pelican's beak.
        
        Where did you find the hump of the F-35?
        
        boriz
        
        +2
        
        17 July 2021 09: 13
        
        https://baltnews.lt/vilnius_news/20190617/1019219870/hudshiy-iz-vseh-samoletov-kakie-nedostatki-u-amerikanskogo-istrebitelya-f-35.html
        https://iarex.ru/news/64833.html
        Not only the hump just behind the cockpit, but also the belly.
        This is an organic flaw. The universal aircraft was made on the basis of VTOL aircraft. Therefore, the power set is made on the basis of the presence of a lifting fan, and not the optimal placement of the missiles. In modification A there is no fan, but the internal space, which is determined by its dimensions, is wide and short.
    2. boriz
      
      +5
      
      16 July 2021 20: 15
      
      The profile will become clear when the cover is removed. It hangs almost everywhere. Here in the middle is more fit. If it is not thicker everywhere (and this is most likely), then the appearance will be completely different.
2. Rum rum
  
  +1
  
  16 July 2021 18: 49
  
  How did you see the profile under the cover? There are only keels and one engine is visible. The cover sags down.
  1. Cyril
    
    -5
    
    16 July 2021 18: 51
    
    The cover practically does not sag down there. From the landing gear struts, you can determine the bottom border of the body quite accurately.
    
    Well, and in front it is generally a spitting image of the F-35
    1. Rum rum
      
      +3
      
      16 July 2021 18: 54
      
      You see what you want.
      Then can you tell me where and what kind of air intakes it has?
      Big-eyed, you are ours.
      Let's wait for the premiere.
      1. Cyril
        
        -2
        
        16 July 2021 19: 10
        
        I don't know why it was so difficult for you to find the air intakes on it, given that they are not located either in the nose or under the fuselage - only the lateral position remains. Here is:
        
        boriz
        
        0
        
        16 July 2021 20: 17
        
        And does the cover hang on the wings?
        
        Cyril
        
        -4
        
        16 July 2021 21: 45
        
        hanging on the wings. On the fuselage - no. Look at the chassis, you can see where they are attached to the body.
        
        boriz
        
        0
        
        17 July 2021 09: 19
        
        https://iz.ru/1104700/anton-lavrov-roman-kretcul/trudnyi-vzlet-minoborony-nakonetc-poluchilo-pervyi-seriinyi-su-57
        On the fuselage, the cover does not hang down only in the middle.
        The chassis is one to one from the Su 57. The Su 57 has 2 more wheels above the front wheel. And the new cover obviously closed the distance of one wheel. Obviously the same.
        
        Rum rum
        
        0
        
        17 July 2021 20: 12
        
        If you cover the Su-57, what will you see in this place?
        These are not leggings, but a cover.
        Although for you liberals this is .....
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +1
        
        18 July 2021 10: 32
        
        I don't know why it was so difficult for you to find the air intakes on it, given that they are not located either in the nose ...
        
        Rather, and just in the nose.
        Stretch the arrows further, and it will become obvious.)
        
        Cyril
        
        -3
        
        18 July 2021 10: 37
        
        So this is still the side location of the air intakes. Is that the channels of the air intakes are closer to the nose than usual.
        
        The nasal arrangement of the air intake at the Mig-15, Mig-21. Right there in the nose. And even the sharp nose of the MiG-21 is a cone-regulator of the air flow, and not an ordinary nose cone.
        
        Here it is obvious that the nose is a normal nose cone.
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +1
        
        18 July 2021 11: 14
        
        Here it is obvious that the nose is a normal nose cone.
        
        Maybe you're right, I just assumed. And the photo, there below, someone posted, indicates that this may also be a "scheme" of MIG21.
        
        Cyril
        
        -2
        
        18 July 2021 11: 18
        
        that this can also be a "scheme" of MIG21.
        
        Not. The side view shows that there is an even top line from the cockpit to the tip of the nose. In the case of the traffic cone, there would be at least a small ledge.
        
        Therefore, 99,9% that the air intakes are installed on the sides are simply "pulled" to the nose.
        
        Rum rum
        
        +1
        
        18 July 2021 18: 54
        
        Catch
        https://topcor.ru/20789-raskryt-vneshnij-oblik-novogo-rossijskogo-istrebitelja.html?utm_source=warfiles.ru
      2. Andrey Ostroushko
        
        +1
        
        16 July 2021 21: 36
        
        The photo shows that the air intakes have a triangular shape, a small cross-section, are strongly extended forward and go into the wing. The absence of the rear horizontal tail is also striking.
        
        Cyril
        
        -3
        
        16 July 2021 21: 47
        
        The photo shows that the air intakes have a triangular shape, a small cross-section, are strongly extended forward and go into the wing. The absence of the rear horizontal tail is also striking.
        
        Does it somehow affect the airplane's profile height?
        
        Andrey Ostroushko
        
        0
        
        16 July 2021 21: 48
        
        I answer the question: "Then can you tell me where and what kind of air intakes it has?"
3. Oleg Ermakov
  
  +3
  
  17 July 2021 08: 36
  
  In fact, the glider is an analogue of the Su-57, taking into account the reduction in size and single-engine performance, and therefore, blowing into corrected some parts of the glider, and even the wingtips, and the hull itself began to seem swollen, because in terms of the capacity of the combat kit it is practically equal to Su -57, it should lose a little in speed, a little if we take the current dviglo to 57, and when the new one, the speed will already be noticeably higher in the 57th, but this is just a prototype, which still has a couple of years of fine-tuning and settings. The engine is still presumably a double-circuit, all the performance characteristics are also hypothetical, and very conditional, strongly underestimated, - the lower nomenal, and there are as many as three of them, here is the lower nom. 2200 km / h, average about 2350, upper 2500. When they say the denomination, this is a constant flight without afterburner, with afterburner it is much more in the stratosphere, but this device is extremely rarely used, unless it is possible to escape from pursuit, with spent equipment, in the enemy's zone , but now these new Vedas are supposed to be flying in a jamb of unmanned aerial vehicles. In short, it takes a long time to explain, if only you could blurt out something about patriots. Everything flows, everything changes, maybe you will someday become this jingoistic patriot, do not renounce.
4. IMHO
  
  0
  
  17 July 2021 21: 22
  
  Hurray patriots always shout, often without thinking, because there are enemies around, but we must rally and be patient. In the USSR, the potential enemy saw military equipment already ready, and the townsfolk did not know about it at all until they showed it at parades, and now there is nothing yet, and British destroyers are already reflected in the sights and we are ready to win everyone. And carrots have risen in price.
  1. aries2200
    
    0
    
    24 July 2021 17: 52
    
    diarrhea from carrots ... do not get carried away with carrots ................ and orders for an order must be taken in advance, and in order to think about the prospective buyer had time .... everything was done correctly in the growing defense export can and jointly produce the state will appear ... the Saudis, for example
5. aries2200
  
  0
  
  24 July 2021 17: 49
  
  paid by the West will be all sorts of techno ... eras ... this is their meaning of being ... ... an excellent bird came out and not expensive.
  1. Cyril
    
    0
    
    24 July 2021 18: 12
    
    Is it an excellent bird - it will be clear only after it at least takes off.
    
    Whether a dear bird came out - it will be clear only after someone buys it.
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

0

16 July 2021 22: 42

this is not a photo, but incognito
Binder

-13

16 July 2021 23: 00

And why are you, gentlemen, excited? The Su-57, which has no analogues and surpasses everything that is in the world, just as it did not fly, does not fly, and this one will not fly - how else?
Termit1309

+9

17 July 2021 01: 33

Quote: Bindyuzhnik
And why are you, gentlemen, excited? The Su-57, which has no analogues and surpasses everything that is in the world, just as it did not fly, does not fly, and this one will not fly - how else?

Well, yes, the Crimean bridge on Mosfilm has not been completed yet, and the planes are already being built. Horror.
1. Binder
  
  -5
  
  17 July 2021 05: 59
  
  Strong argument!
2. IMHO
  
  +5
  
  17 July 2021 08: 47
  
  You forgot nonexistent icebreakers, completely imported MC21 and what else is there)))
  The engine on the Su57 does not have the most promising promised it is a fact. And so it flies to itself.
  1. Monster_Fat
    
    +1
    
    17 July 2021 10: 30
    
    The aircraft is most likely a prototype of the Su-57 variation, but with one engine to reduce the cost. This is easy to assume, since the car is positioned primarily for export.
Kofesan

+2

17 July 2021 10: 29

Guessing is pointless. And it's better to see once what to hear a hundred times! I will wait with interest for the salon.
rotkiv04

+5

17 July 2021 10: 36

Bindyuzhnik and then put in his five shekels
1. Alexander K_2
  
  -3
  
  17 July 2021 12: 20
  
  Why were you so taken? HAVE SHOWED and shown, have shown and promised little recently? The main thing is that you have definitely decided for yourself who is to blame for the failures - that is 99% of the success of the current leadership of Russia!
Gadley

+1

17 July 2021 12: 59

Yes, this is a repainted f35, you see, in Syria, they took it to the exhibition.
1. Herman 4223
  
  0
  
  17 July 2021 17: 37
  
  In Israel, the car was sold, and then someone burned it. Now you have to make your own urgently.
ENGLISH

+1

17 July 2021 14: 11
maybe this???
1. Kofesan
  
  0
  
  17 July 2021 22: 32
  
  Can! But it's better not to guess, otherwise the first impression will be smeared ... But I would not want to ...
bobba94

0

17 July 2021 17: 58

Everyone sees something ..... in profile - the spitting image of the Su-57, in the front view - the F-35, the rear view is very mysterious and does not resemble anyone. So far I only see something covered with a cover .... When it takes off, then I will see that this is not a model of an airplane, but a real airplane and, perhaps, I will also think who it reminds me of ..
Sergey Latyshev

0

17 July 2021 19: 26

And why are you all horny?
All this is garbage.
F35 is a bomber, therefore thicker. The main thing in him is that he is small, Less than a small MIG, and a little more than a training yak. What all the pros / cons are just silent about ...

And this one, like a fighter, should be thinner. And they all look alike. As close relatives ...
IMHO

+1

17 July 2021 21: 17

What to guess, on the 20th they will show and tell everything in detail. I won't be surprised if Dmitry Olegovich is sitting in the cockpit. The question is - will they take off or will they show the model, saying that we will overdo it all again?
Termit1309

0

18 July 2021 09: 18

Quote: Sergey Latyshev
And why are you all horny?
All this is garbage.
F35 is a bomber, therefore thicker. The main thing in him is that he is small, Less than a small MIG, and a little more than a training yak. What all the pros / cons are just silent about ...

And this one, like a fighter, should be thinner. And they all look alike. As close relatives ...

Oh, those experts. The fact that it is slightly less than Mig -35 but almost five tons heavier is also all silent