Why did Washington pass up before London's escapade off the coast of Crimea

Looking at the latest epic events associated with the unprecedented passage of a British destroyer through our territorial waters, it is not the audacity of the British that we are used to, but the passive and vague position of Washington on this matter. He is in no hurry to support London in its struggle for Ukraine's rights to establish a shipping regime in its exclusive 12-mile sea zone around the Crimean peninsula, annexed from it by the Russian Federation. And it is clear that London does not care about Ukraine, he climbed into the sandbox, where adult big guys play with big cubes in their adult games with their toy boats, pursuing their exclusively selfish goals. What kind?

British tail attempt to wag an American dog

The very first thing that comes to mind is that London is not satisfied with the thaw in relations between Washington and Moscow after the Geneva summit, and, by causing Russian fire on itself, is thus trying to disrupt the emerging detente. After all, if Moscow had undertaken sharp gestures to curb the illegal (from its point of view) invasion of its territorial waters, and then the collective West would again face the need to tighten the screws to the Kremlin that had lost its fear and decency. And then - goodbye to detente, goodbye to Nord Stream 2, hello to a new round of confrontation. The problem has been solved. Everyone is happy, everyone is laughing. The loudest of all are Ukraine, Poland and the Baltic limitrophes.



But why isn't Washington laughing? Is the threat to China so great that it is ready to make peace with Moscow for the sake of leveling it? Did a black cat run between Washington and its devoted satellite London? And she did run. And not one, but ten. And below I will explain which ones and why.

In the meantime, let's deal with the Kremlin. Why, with such an obvious insolent and impudent pulling of the blanket by London, does he still blame Washington for this? You have not yet forgotten the statement made by Putin during the last Direct Line, when he accused the United States of overseeing this provocation, whose reconnaissance aircraft, whose tail number he brought, took off from an American military airfield on the Greek island of Crete and proceeded in the direction of Cape Fiolent filming information about the operation of our anti-aircraft and anti-ship defense systems at the moment a British intruder ship passes through their zone of responsibility? Putin's accusations against Washington are all the more strange since the work of reconnaissance aircraft is not news for the Russian Federation and its MO is not. They hang in clusters over our new fortified area, equipped in the Crimea, filming and bearing the work of our air defense, anti-missile defense and electronic warfare systems. And this passage of the British destroyer along our shores was planned, and even if it did not deviate from the course and did not enter our territorial waters by 3 km, it would still be led and removed by a NATO AWACS (early warning) aircraft. With this approach to our borders, all our surveillance and targeting systems are brought to full combat readiness, and even if there is no violation of the state border, the reconnaissance aircraft always has something to shoot.

Most likely, Putin understood that such games do not start at his own peril and risk, and the commander of the British destroyer is accountable to his superior NATO command, and it is all entirely made up of Americans. And even if the Briton did not inform him of his plans, then Washington has more leverage than Moscow to influence him. And if Washington is really interested in softening our relations, then it influences London in such a way that it does not even have the slightest desire to repeat this experiment again. Otherwise, let him blame himself for the consequences. Putin has clearly indicated what will happen next time, if this, God forbid, happens again.

Big boys play with big dice

With the Kremlin sorted out, now we turn to London and its difficult relationship with its overlord. Who do you think is in charge of this couple? This is a purely rhetorical question, you don't have to answer. Therefore, Putin and put pressure on the chief, not the follower. In the cruel world of cash, all the roles have long been scheduled, and the tail can wag the dog only in the movies. Even this tail and Her Majesty. By the way, the role of the grandmother in this story is also far from the last. And it was no coincidence that she was the first to congratulate the ship's crew on the successful completion of the operation for her (after all, not at the bottom of the sea!). Well, we'll come back to grandmother.

In the meantime, let's close the question with the cats that ran between London and Washington. It would seem that strategic partners, friends are inseparable, transatlantic allies, historical ties, an updated Atlantic Charter and all that, what can black cats be? It turns out they can! The thing is that in the world of big guys playing with big cubes, not everything is so simple. There, relationships are not built on the linear principle of friend-foe, vassal-suzerain, senior-junior. It turns out that over grown-up big guys, no matter how big they control, there are some global forces pulling these guys from behind the curtains behind invisible strings. And it just so happened that Biden, who came to the Oval Office in January of this year, represents some forces, while Boris Johnson, with his head banged up, is completely opposite. And don't give a damn about transatlantic unity!

The fact is that Biden represents the liberal globalists (the US Democratic Party is their tool), and poor Johnson is the isolationist conservatives (in Britain they are called the Tories, in the USA their mouthpiece is the Republican Party). That is why London was passionately friends with Washington during the reign of Biden's predecessor, the Invincible Cowboy Trump, and with the changing of the guard in the White House, a black cat ran between them. And not one! A marker of this was the statement by Tony Blinken (for those who do not know, this is the US Secretary of State - the third person in the state!) That from now on Washington will bet on Berlin. To Berlin, Karl! It is there that people who are close to them in spirit. The same liberal globalists (CDU / CSU, headed by Angela Merkel). And this movement has no national and state borders. It is supranational, transboundary in its essence. That is why bravura marches are played in Berlin. The era of the destroyer-Trump is over, sane, from their point of view, people have come. Are you asking me why Biden opened the green light for Nord Stream 2 and does not support London in all his endeavors? Because.

The wrong people are sitting in London! For the first time since 1936, people representing the Windsor-Rothschild clan came to the office at 10 Downing Street (this is the official residence of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom). Their frontman is Boris Johnson, the leader of the Conservative Party, who in 2019 succeeded Theresa May in this position and at the residence on Downing Street, representing the interests of the globalist bankers who have continuously ruled Britain since 1936, since the abdication of Edward VIII. from the throne. Liberal globalists and isolationist conservatives are two elite British ruling factions that have competed with each other for the past 100 years. political power in the country. At one time, it was the liberal globalists who destroyed the British Empire with the hands of their frontman Winston Churchill. Now, with the arrival of Boris Johnson, their time is over, they have been wiped out from power by the isolationist conservatives. But in America, unfortunately for the latter, the opposite processes took place - there the isolationist conservatives behind Trump were wiped out from power by the Liberal Democrats, having insolently rigged elections, after which London began to have problems and they can end only after a change in the ruling elite.

I must say that in the global world everything is even more complicated. Both globalists and isolationists are not the tops of this iceberg. In the food chain called the global world and above them there are forces that influence them and determine their behavior. There are only three of them. Let's call them conditionally - the traditional industrial capital behind the isolationists-conservatives (in the USA their mouthpiece is the Trumpists-Republicans), financial-speculative capital, long and firmly connected with the liberal-globalists (whose instruments in the USA are Democrats and neo-conservatives-Republicans, you see how difficult it is!), and a force that has re-entered the arena of struggle, let's call it big tech, is the American Silicon Valley - the masters of the Internet and social networks (digital). It was the support of the latter that ensured Trump's unexpected victory in 2016, and it was the tug of big tech and the masters of social networks to his side that allowed Biden to steal his victory in 2020 from the Invincible Cowboy. Trump's defeat in November 2020 was the defeat of industrial capital, of which he was a protégé, to the combined forces of big tech and speculative finance capital, whose protégé was and is old Joe. But having ensured the victory for Biden, the conditional Zuckerberg suddenly faced the fact that his interests in this victory were not taken into account. What Zuckerberg would like to be summoned to the carpet in Congress and forced to report to him as some naughty boy? Therefore, now we are witnessing the opposite process - the disenchanted, feeling its strength, big tech unites with the lost industrial capital, whose interests are represented by the Republicans, and begins to slowly crush the bankers-financiers who have lost their banks in the person of their proteges, the Democrats.

While the arena of their struggle was the United States itself, which recently experienced a change of government, but as soon as everything is settled there and everything is back to normal, they will immediately take over the rest of the world, which they plan to divide into currency zones of influence, and the right to have their own separate independent the zone will be allowed only to those who can protect this right (exclusively by military means). Therefore, in the distant future, which all living people risk to find, the world will be divided into the Chinese currency zone of influence, Russian (guess who will enter there?), American and European, which has every right to exist, you just need to build up military muscles.

And it was for the right to rule in the latter in an unequal battle that London and Berlin came together. And in order to win this battle, London needs a nosebleed to split the European Union. He is trying to do this with the help of his blunt mongrels - the Eastern European limitrophes, Poland, the Baltic countries, the Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria, Georgia, Ukraine (this one is generally stupid, does not even understand what games she is involved in) and Turkey (the Sultan has the game of your interest). Most of the listed countries were firmly tied to the previous US administration and with the arrival of Biden's team in the White House, black times begin for them (some, due to their natural stupidity, have not even understood this yet, and some, in the person of the Baltic tigers, generally think in other categories - they always for those who are against the Russian Federation, not realizing that times have changed, and the Russian Federation is now an influential force, for the location of which the powerful are fighting).

To be continued.