Gazprom's condition: Europe will not receive additional gas through Ukraine

33

Amazing things are happening in Europe these days. If a year ago LNG was sold there for mere pennies, and the future of trunk gas pipelines seemed very vague in the face of the onslaught of the "fuel of the future", now everything has changed dramatically. A little more, and the obstinate European bureaucrats, who recently disdainfully turned up their noses from Russian gas, will soon themselves begin to beg Gazprom to launch Nord Stream-2 as soon as possible, which they themselves put obstacles to. How did this become possible?

The entire current situation is the result of a combination of a number of global factors. The coronavirus restrictions of 2020 led to a sharp drop in consumer demand, industrial production and, therefore, the consumption of various types of hydrocarbon fuels and raw materials, including natural gas. The price for 1 cubic meters in the premium European market has dropped to an obscene $ 70. For all suppliers of "blue fuel" this became a serious challenge: investors began to postpone new LNG projects, and with regard to the trunk pipelines under construction, a natural question arose about their expediency. But a year later, everything changed dramatically.



China, from where COVID-19 escaped, thanks to strict quarantine measures, was the first to cope with the consequences of the pandemic and reach a sustainable economic height. Other countries in Southeast Asia followed. Accordingly, the consumption of all types of fuel has also increased. In the first six months of 2021, gas growth amounted to about 17% compared to the same period of the "coronavirus" 2020. And everything would be fine, but the Asian economic miracle played a cruel joke with Europe.

Industry and consumer demand in the Old World also began to recover, albeit not at such a rapid pace as in the "tigers" and "dragons", but there was a sudden shortage of "blue fuel". The fact is that in Asia, unlike Europe, where Gazprom is close by, there is no such developed network of trunk pipelines, but there are many receiving terminals on the sea coast. The rapid economic recovery in this region has led to the fact that LNG prices here have become 80% higher than in Europe. Its suppliers, without further ado, sent their tankers to Asia, leaving the European Union practically without liquefied natural gas. The cost of LNG in the Old World has now approached $ 400 per thousand cubic meters, amounting to 397. Not weak price swing, if compared with last year's $ 70!

And then the most interesting thing began. Despite the fact that now there is an abnormal heat, it is high time to think about the upcoming heating season. The winter of 2020-2021 turned out to be unusually cold: both Europe and Asia were frozen. The Europeans had to burn a lot of "blue fuel" and ask Gazprom to increase the volume of its supplies. Then the domestic state corporation went to meet Western consumers. But not now. On the contrary, the monopolist even reduced pumping by 20% in comparison with the "pre-coronavirus" level, but did so within the framework of its contractual obligations. Europe is indignant at the actions of Gazprom, accusing it of unwillingness to help and striving to get rich on other people's problems. Ironically, isn't it?

But the truth is there is something "karmic" in all of this, since the Europeans have created almost all their problems with their own hands. Certainly, there is a certain logic in the actions of Brussels. In an effort to diversify its sources of energy supply, the EU has built receiving LNG terminals on the coast, has given the go-ahead for the construction of several new trunk pipelines, intending to play on the contradictions between the interests of different suppliers. At the same time, European officials at the behest of the United States made a difficult life for the Russian gas pipeline Nord Stream-2, hoping first to slow down its construction, and then to take its work under their control. However, they could not take everything into account.

COVID-19 has become a real "black swan" that brought down the world economy, and then pulled out with an "invisible hand" all free LNG from Europe to Asia. The second unforeseen factor was the unexpectedly tough position of Gazprom, which refused to pump additional volumes of gas to the EU in excess of the one stipulated in the contract. Recall that at the end of 2019, the domestic monopolist was actually forced to sign a transit agreement with Kiev, which is extremely unprofitable for it, for a period of 5 years. In accordance with it, in this and in subsequent years, until 2024, it must supply 40 billion cubic meters through the Ukrainian GTS. All that is on top, he must pay the transit agent for his services at an increased rate. Yeah. Does this mean that Russia must now, to its own detriment, meet the increased needs of the EU under the unfavorable terms of the contract they have imposed on us?

Apparently, Gazprom has a different opinion. The monopolist delivers exactly as much as it should, and not a cubic meter more, earning at a high price. For once, you can pretend that the problems of Europeans do not bother our sheriff. But they are very worried, calling the management of the state company with all sorts of words. For example, The Financial Times comments on the situation:

Gazprom is simply trying to maximize its profits at a time when spot prices are high, gas storage facilities are empty, and demand for LNG is high in Asia. They are just opportunistic.

Well, of course, it's not just about wanting to “cut coupons” at high prices. The head of Gazprom Export, Elena Burmistrova, actually issued an ultimatum in plain text:

Gazprom has several additional applications for gas supplies to European countries. And some of these applications can be provided by Nord Stream 2.

In other words, the Kremlin is making it clear to Brussels that additional gas volumes will go, but not through the Ukrainian GTS, but through Nord Stream 2. By the way, the state-owned company has already reduced gas pumping to Germany via Belarus and Poland via the Yamal-Europe pipeline. The trend, however. And what to do, they themselves imposed unfavorable conditions on Russia for increasing supplies through Independent, now let them deal with the consequences. Or they decide something as soon as possible with the certification and launch of Nord Stream 2. Winter Is Coming.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    1 July 2021 13: 12
    Finally you bought yourself new, good shoes, Sergei! (joke)
    1. The comment was deleted.
  2. -10
    1 July 2021 13: 15
    In our time, I would do everything for this Europe to die or devour itself. The better they live in Europe, the worse they live in Russia! Prices, wages, jobs, gasoline, etc. Putin's direct line only confirmed this. And to please, that Miller's salary will be even higher, I don't want to.
    1. +2
      1 July 2021 14: 00
      If the West prints new trillions of dollars, then dollar-pegged rubles depreciate, as do those dollars. The difference is that the West increases salaries in dollars, while in Russia they do not increase salaries in rubles. Hence, inflation is extensive.
      1. -5
        1 July 2021 14: 39
        And this is in which city? I'm from ms
        1. 0
          1 July 2021 18: 47
          Humor? Crazy?
        2. +1
          1 July 2021 22: 58
          And "ms" is where ZhP in Zhmerinka is?
      2. -4
        1 July 2021 15: 04
        Have not played enough tic-tac-toe, dear? How is life in Zhmerinka?
    2. 0
      6 July 2021 07: 36
      Quote: steel maker
      In our time, I would do everything for this Europe to die or devour itself. ......... And to be glad that Miller's salary will be even higher, I don't want that.

      I don’t know how you make steel, but your thoughts “cook” like those of an obstinate 10-year-old child, short, over-emotional, divorced from critical perspective thinking.
  3. +14
    1 July 2021 13: 15
    Gazprom is just trying to maximize its profits

    It's just some kind of song. And in Europe it turns out there are companies that do nothing but minimize their profits.
    But if you dig deeper, it turns out that it is not GazProm that refuses to supply gas to Europe through Ukraine. It is Ukraine that blocks gas supplies to Europe.
    1. +10
      1 July 2021 13: 50
      When the Americans are chasing profit, this is a free market, when the Russians are doing the same, this is opportunism.
    2. +2
      1 July 2021 18: 06
      It is Ukraine that blocks gas supplies to Europe

      Ukraine is luring Gazprom in various ways. Proposes to buy out 68 billion cubic meters / m in June-July. They put it up for auction, as if someone else could transport gas through the Gazprom pipe. Zelya said the other day that he would force Gazprom to conclude an agreement for 15-20 years and no less than 100-112 billion per month, but did not say how he would do it.
  4. -17
    1 July 2021 14: 03
    Does this mean that Russia must now, to its own detriment, meet the increased needs of the EU under the unfavorable terms of the contract they have imposed on us?

    - that is, if I understand correctly, it is fundamentally unprofitable for Russia to pump gas to the EU at a price of $ 397 and pay Ukraine $ 3 for pumping, but if you pay $ 2,66 for pumping, this will not harm national pride in any way. . What's this? It turns out that national pride is worth $ 0,34 ???
    1. +13
      1 July 2021 14: 07
      The value of national pride is estimated in cookies!
      #the whole world knows it!
    2. +4
      1 July 2021 14: 07
      And who said that Russia sells gas to Europe at a price of $ 397?
      1. -3
        1 July 2021 14: 10
        Marzhetsky:

        The cost of LNG in the Old World has now approached $ 400 per thousand cubic meters, amounting to 397. Not weak price swing, if compared with last year's $ 70!
        1. +9
          1 July 2021 14: 13
          The gas price has approached 400. That's right. But who said that Russian gas is being sold at that price? And why is Gazprom refusing to pump through Ukraine? Take an interest, it is informative
          1. -3
            1 July 2021 17: 41
            Inquired, analyzed the reports of Gazprom, Novatek and others. And here's what it turns out - from 17-18, there has been a small (2-5% per year), but a steady decline in the volume of gas sales both on the external and internal markets. At the same time, an increase in the volume of gas pipeline construction is clearly visible (again, both on the external and internal markets). In the reports, the decrease in gas sales is explained by the economic crisis in foreign markets, pandemic, reorientation to LNG, etc. etc. It would seem - they refuse in Europe, China, Asia - reorient to the domestic market - 70% of households in Russia are not supplied with gas, but no, it turns out that the average Russian does not want to lay a pipe to the house for his hard-earned money (even from his fence to the house). But in fact, the problem is not in tightness - in fact, there is a decrease in gas production and the main reason is worn-out drilling equipment and the impossibility, in recent years, of completing with spare parts. The wells are being preserved, but they are no longer trying to open them. Nobody talks about drilling new ones. First-hand information - the brother-in-law has been working as a site manager in the settlement of Gubkinsky of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug for more than 30 years.
            1. +6
              1 July 2021 22: 03
              You weren't interested in that. The equipment is worn out. And production may decline. But who is to blame for this?
              The development of gas (and any other) fields requires billions of dollars in investments and is designed to payback for decades. That is why the Groningen model of contracts was adopted in the development of fields in the North Sea. The main provisions are a long-term contract (for 20 years), the "take-or-pay" principle, pegging to the oil basket.
              Now the North. the seas are depleted and the Groningen contract is recognized as non-marketable. For 50 years it was a market, and now it suddenly ceased to be. They want spot contracts. That is, there is no long-term contract, there is no take-or-pay principle, and there is no pegging to the oil basket. And then there is stock speculation.
              Under such conditions, who will invest billions in the development of new fields, or in the renewal of equipment at old ones? After all, you can spend billions, and the exchange traders in the market will kill the price.
              GazProm is doing the right thing to reduce production. That is enough for Europe. And if not enough - let them go to the stock exchange and buy from speculators. They were striving for this.
              We have built LNG terminals all over Europe, so let them demand that the States, Qatar or Libya supply them with "molecules of freedom."

              They have already answered about Ukraine. Ukraine does NOT guarantee transit over 15 million cubic meters per day. Therefore, GazProm is not going to drive gas to who knows where and still pay extra for it. Ukraine has gone completely crazy.
        2. +2
          1 July 2021 14: 33
          Gazprom did not book new volume for June additional capacity for the transit of gas to Europe through the territory of Ukraine, follows from the data of the Hungarian trading platform RBP.
          In total, 63,7 million cubic meters per day were offered for additional booking of transit capacities at the last auction. At the same time, on May 17, a regular auction was already held for booking additional capacities for pumping gas through the Ukrainian territory to Europe. Gazprom bought all additional 15 million cubic meters per day available for booking..

          Since October last year, Gazprom has monthly booked additional capacities for gas transit to Europe via Ukraine. In recent months, reservations have not exceeded 15 million cubic meters of gas per daydespite continued strong demand from European consumers.

          As you can see, Gazprom pumps an additional 15 million cubic meters per day. But it does not redeem anything that is in excess of 15 million cubic meters. What is the reason?
          1. GRF
            0
            1 July 2021 21: 03
            Quote: Bakht
            ... But it does not redeem anything that is in excess of 15 million cubic meters. What is the reason?

            Up to 15 guaranteed transit, and everything above is not, i.e. will feed on account of repayment of something ...
            1. +4
              1 July 2021 21: 55
              Quite right. Well, who will drive the gas to no one knows where, and even pay extra for it.
              So let Europe be concerned about the opportunistic activities of the Ukrainian GTS.
        3. -1
          1 July 2021 14: 51
          S.E. our love need to be protected, cherished and cared for! He is the only one among the authors of this forum! tongue lol
    3. +1
      1 July 2021 23: 04
      - that is, we will finish building the pipe and pump it for 0,99 !!! Now multiply 50 lard by 0,99 dB.BL,
  5. +2
    1 July 2021 18: 21
    Marzhetsky. You warmed my soul. Plus sign.
  6. +2
    1 July 2021 18: 45
    Quote: Bulanov
    If the West prints new trillions of dollars, then dollar-pegged rubles depreciate, as do those dollars. The difference is that the West increases salaries in dollars, while in Russia they do not increase salaries in rubles. Hence, inflation is extensive.

    Economist ...
  7. 0
    1 July 2021 20: 32
    Miller, of course, gets super profits, but as a manager he is great.
  8. +2
    1 July 2021 20: 44
    You are a cynic, however, Marzhetskiy. Blame Gazprom and ho..ly it seems nothing to do with it bully
  9. +1
    2 July 2021 07: 06
    Fuck the EU ': US diplomat Victoria Nuland's phonecall leaked - video
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/07/eu-us-diplomat-victoria-nuland-phonecall-leaked-video
  10. -1
    2 July 2021 10: 31
    If Europe seriously needed gas, they would temporarily launch Nord Stream -1 by 100%. Otherwise, they just need to replenish their reserves just in case. In general, another "cry of Yaroslavna".
  11. 0
    2 July 2021 11: 30
    Should we be happy or not?
  12. +2
    2 July 2021 17: 22
    Do not spit into someone else's well, know that you may also have to drink from it. Europe warmed itself up by caring about Ukraine, well, they really wanted to support the now very Russophobic Banderia at the expense of the Russian Federation. Never mind, the Germans will have to feed both the Ukrainians and the Balts for their cost. Well, we were a little lucky because gas prices soared and Germany really needed Nord Stream 2.
    1. -1
      3 July 2021 07: 28
      The more candy wrappers are printed, the higher the prices, the higher the prices, the greater the foreign exchange earnings, the larger the foreign exchange earnings, the lower the debt burden of the State, do not go to the "fortuneteller" ..... we finance the printing press of the West ...
  13. 0
    4 July 2021 12: 39
    Don't dig a hole for another, you'll fall into it yourself! There is no such proverb in the EU?)