Belarus accused Russian oligarchs of provocations

31 May 2021 25

More than six months have passed since the presidential elections in Belarus, but the echo of those events still continues. So, at the moment Minsk accuses Russian oligarchs of planning provocations on the streets of Belarusian cities after August 9 last year.

According to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus Vladimir Makei, some oligarchs from Russia were preparing provocations in Belarus after the election of the head of state. The FSB warned Belarusian colleagues about possible actions of oligarchic structures from the Russian Federation, which indicated the specific names of those involved in the events.

Perhaps then there were suggestions that some actions were being taken by individual Russian oligarchs or former Russian oligarchs.

- said the head of the Foreign Ministry of Belarus in a conversation with journalists "Kommersant".

Large-scale unrest in Minsk and other large cities of the country began after the announcement of the victory in the election of the incumbent head of state Alexander Lukashenko, who has been ruling the country since 1994. Demonstrators called for a review of the election results. The security forces used truncheons, stun grenades and rubber bullets against the dissenters. According to Lukashenka, the actions of the protesters were directed by "curators" from abroad, interested in "their" candidates for the post of head of the Republic of Belarus.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Alexndr p

0

31 May 2021 12: 32

It's time for Russia to use the position of a creditor and set conditions so that such monkeys would no longer work in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus
If the monkey continues to work, loans will be at a higher percentage.

"Former Russian oligarchs including"

Is the name of the grubby Hodor still fearsome?
Heroes Heroes

0

31 May 2021 13: 37

This Makey has already pulled up. 100 times already crap with his predictions, and still nothing will calm down. All along with the mustachioed Russian oligarchs seem to him.
123

0

31 May 2021 13: 37

Maybe? Were there any suggestions? I would like to be specific. What kind of actions, who are these mysterious individual Russian oligarchs, former and not so?
And so citizen Makei throws a substance mixed with fog on the fan and blows it to the east. In my opinion, this is a multi-vector eructation. Alexander Grigorievich is distracted by the word integration, the Foreign Ministry broadcasts all these phobias and concerns.
1. Bulanov
  
  0
  
  31 May 2021 13: 40
  
  Suppose Makei informed Putin about these oligarchs through Lukashenka at a meeting? We are awaiting further reaction from the Russian president.
  1. 123
    
    0
    
    31 May 2021 14: 21
    
    Suppose Makei informed Putin about these oligarchs through Lukashenka at a meeting? We are awaiting further reaction from the Russian president.
    
    Lukashenka on the parcels of Makei? In my opinion, this is Makei's job to voice and convey (in the sense to the attention).
    You can guess How do we understand this? What kind of reaction are we expecting? Especially in relation to the "former". Putin will send special forces for Hodor? Or is it enough for Lavrov to declare just as vaguely that the Kremlin is dissatisfied with the actions of the "individual"?
    It is not clear what they consider to be a preparation of provocations and what they call a provocation. Financed? Incited? Have you tried to crush Belarusian enterprises? Did they express themselves undiplomatically about Lukashenka? Did you just look askance?
    1. Bulanov
      
      -1
      
      31 May 2021 14: 59
      
      Hodor should not be called a Russian oligarch. He's on the wanted list in Russia. So this is to another country - to the place of his stay.
      1. 123
        
        0
        
        31 May 2021 15: 33
        
        I agree, but then what is the essence of the claims for the former? Who are the exes then?
Jacques sekavar

+3

31 May 2021 14: 43

Some wealthy citizens of the Russian Federation from the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs have economic interests in the union state, and, as you know, politics reflects economic interests.
zenion

+1

31 May 2021 14: 48

There are no oligarchs in Russia, there is only a middle class, ranging from the seventh and ending with graduates. The rest could not finish the first grade and are dangling in preparatory.
Sergey Latyshev

-1

31 May 2021 14: 56

How bad it is for Old Man to remember the Russian oligarchs who called for the division of "ineffective Belarusian property" right after the elections .... etc ..
1. 123
  
  +1
  
  31 May 2021 15: 35
  
  How bad it is for Old Man to remember the Russian oligarchs who called for the division of "ineffective Belarusian property" right after the elections .... etc ..
  
  Please share the details. Who are they? Straight wondering what it is about?
  1. Sergey Latyshev
    
    -2
    
    31 May 2021 17: 35
    
    Bring up old articles, incl. Online.
    The owner of Uralchem spoke most often, I remember.
    1. 123
      
      +1
      
      31 May 2021 18: 22
      
      The owner of Uralchem spoke most often, I remember.
      
      So he tried to "divide" it without any elections. Is this news? And here - today the elections, tomorrow the hungry Russian oligarchs are tearing the "blue-eyed". Such a direct horror story.
      1. Sergey Latyshev
        
        0
        
        1 June 2021 01: 32
        
        No, what are you protecting the oligarchs ...
        
        There were exactly the same articles: "today elections, tomorrow hungry Russian oligarchs tear ..."
        ineffective industry
        
        How come? Bkali keeps prices below Ukali, and much ... prevents him from becoming an offshore monopolist ...
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        1 June 2021 08: 52
        
        No, what are you protecting the oligarchs ...
        
        Where?
        
        There were exactly the same articles: "today elections, tomorrow hungry Russian oligarchs tear ..."
        ineffective industry
        
        That's what I'm talking about. Belarusians are frightened by the insidious Russian oligarchs, who are just waiting for Lukashenka to sign up for integration, and in the morning everything will be taken away and their pockets turned out.
        As far as inefficient industry is concerned, it is rather related to the economy as a whole. Lukashenka personally showed unprofitable state farms around the neck of those who were still afloat and showed them on TV. And our agriculture is on the rise and it also needs a sales market.
        And if we talk specifically about industry, then a sales market is needed for products. We have it for the most part. Everything goes to the fact that it will be almost all with us. But the "party line" is aimed at reducing dependence, have you heard the word import substitution? The chassis for air defense is now being made in Bryansk, Kamaz is preparing a replacement for another chassis for missiles, it has set its sights on the niche of Belaz, larger quarry trucks have begun to be produced, and so on. The volume of sales will inevitably fall, therefore, the less the series, the higher the price, less profit, less investment in modernization and development. The competition is losing, production becomes ineffective. Then only subsidies from the budget or closure.
        Here the choice is small, or you become a part of the country, or it is already determined that you are a separate country and trade relations as with another country, and these are your problems.
        
        How come? Bkali keeps prices below Ukali, and much ... prevents him from becoming an offshore monopolist ...
        
        But this is in vain in a bunch. Belkali lowered prices later. Coronavirus, decline in international trade, Lukashenka started having problems with the trade balance, a shortage of currency. Then fertilizers were sent at a decent price. They shoved where they could and what they could. At the same time, in order to preserve their production, they began to attach gasoline to us at reduced prices, then the needs of Europe and Ukraine decreased, by the way, too.
        
        So is this all Uralkali? Are they the oligarchs? Is there anyone else on the list?
        
        Sergey Latyshev
        
        0
        
        1 June 2021 09: 20
        
        Eco you are verbose. Looks like dofig time.
        1. ...
        2. Everywhere like that. their own should be afraid of strangers.
        State Department, multi-vector, Iranian stream, Endogan's assassin partner, and so on.
        
        Moreover, our multi-vector approach is good, and theirs is bad.
        
        2a. Import substitution is cool. 7 years of success. But Somewhere there, in the distance.
        In the meantime, there are Chinese light bulbs in the chandeliers and an imported telephone in their hands.
        
        Themselves write: "less series, more price, less profit,"
        
        3. Bullshit. you yourself write "The competition is losing," ...
        RB sells just cheaper, and the Urals just wants to cash in on monopoly ... "Russians will buy everything ...."
        Competition ... or 2nd standards?
        
        4. There were more, but Uralkali was printed the most ... he really really wanted a piece of someone else's pie ...
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        1 June 2021 10: 34
        
        Everywhere it is. their own should be afraid of strangers.
        State Department, multi-vector, Iranian stream, Endogan's assassin partner, and so on.
        
        Why should we be afraid of the State Department? What's so terrible about it? Will it impose sanctions again? No Iranian flow is foreseen, do not worry. And everything will be fine with Erdogan, his head does not work like Yanukovych's, the economy and common sense will overpower.
        
        Moreover, our multi-vector approach is good, and theirs is bad.
        
        For them, it may be good, but it does not fit with ours. Here either or, or integration and we have a common multi-vector or separately, and then do whatever you want with your multi-vector.
        
        Import substitution is cool. 7 years of success. But Somewhere there, in the distance.
        In the meantime, there are Chinese light bulbs in the chandeliers and an imported telephone in their hands.
        
        You are right about the phones. But have many countries succeeded in import substitution? And buy a Russian light bulb, they are no worse.
        https://productcenter.ru/producers/catalog-lampy-496
        
        RB sells just cheaper, and the Urals just wants to cash in on monopoly ... "Russians will buy everything ...."
        Competition ... or 2nd standards?
        
        What are the double standards? The price is cheaper because there is an urgent need for money, at least a little right now. These are dumping prices. Competition is good for the consumer. Let them compete in our domestic market, but according to the rules. In the foreign market, we, as producers, do not need competition. Let it already be determined, are we together or separately and competitors? If the latter, what are the claims? It is customary to devour competitors.
        
        Sergey Latyshev
        
        -1
        
        1 June 2021 12: 40
        
        1) Do you want the State Department? will immediately write to the liberals ...
        Then Cover, Finami and Poles.
        2) Tse multi-vector. Why buy more when there is cheaper?
        3) There is a lot, I agree ... Only somewhere there ...
        4) Tse tightness on the globe.
        I was just watching then, RB was letting go of the world, and nifiga did not lower ...
        It was the Ural who wanted to lift it up to the skies ... if it was 2 times, if it was 5 times more expensive ... I will not remember in a moment
        
        Capitalism and competition. Free. We trade with cover, and nothing. Including diesel fuel. The famous phrase: "You need to rejoice"
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        1 June 2021 13: 20
        
        We are not afraid of the State Department, the "Ukrainians", or the Finns and the Poles. Do not worry in liberda you will not be written down for this. Would you like help writing that you are not like that?
        
        You look from the perspective of the consumer. That's what I wrote to you, competition is a blessing for the domestic market. If you look from the manufacturer's position, competition in the external market is not desirable, and the profit falls.
        
        Can we put an owl on a light bulb? They are, after all, their own, import-substituted. I mean that import substitution still works. Production is expanding.
        
        Why doesn't Ural seek to raise prices? Capitalism, profit ... Why are Belarusian colleagues against it?
        I was referring to the prices in the last year. What year are you talking about?
        
        We trade with everyone. Trading is better than fighting. Only now, Lukashenka is getting worse and worse, the "second Switzerland" does not come out to the market, they are trying not to let them in, probably have not heard about capitalism, competition, markets. By the way, we are also pressed, but it is easier for us, we are larger, there is not enough tape for us. But to Belarus easily. But there is independence. The truth is illusory.
        
        Sergey Latyshev
        
        0
        
        1 June 2021 13: 41
        
        Yes, everything is clear. When capitalism is like good for us.
        When capitalism is bad for the Republic of Belarus. Since our oligarchs have less profit.
        
        Like "We trade with everyone. Trading is better than fighting." - that's good.
        for RB it is bad. it's just "worse"
        How dare they samito, without the prompts of the "effective oligarchs" then?
        
        This is a typical point of view. Why don't you need independence, quickly come back under the wings of our Chubais ... it's good that you, unlike any Jamshuts, have a lot ...
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        123
        
        +3
        
        1 June 2021 14: 18
        
        Well, let them dare, let them try to resume air communication with Europe, why would they need additional flights to the country of "effective oligarchs"?
        You have already pulled up with your Chubas, there are enough of their own. Local are they different, socialist and for the people, not like Russian? Just let them decide either with us, or let them take care of the "blue-eyed" one themselves. Soros, he is probably better than "Chubais"
        
        In Russia, the share of the economy controlled by the state is more than 50%
        https://fas.gov.ru/publications/18306
        
        In Belarus, the situation is not much different
        
        At the end of the first half of 2019, there were 3320 state-owned enterprises in Belarus. This is 3,5% less than in the same period last year. The share of the population employed in such enterprises has also decreased: from 44,9% last year to 43,6% now. Such data are provided by Belstat.
        The highest specific proportion of all state-owned enterprises is noted in the industrial sector: the public sector accounts for 74,2% of industrial production. It is also reported that the public sector generates 42,8% of Belarusian exports and 16,2% of retail trade.
        
        https://spektr.by/archives/79395
        
        Here's a little about the efficiency of the Belarusian economy:
        https://neg.by/novosti/otkrytj/neozhidannaya-statistika-po-belorusskomu-gossektoru
        
        Sergey Latyshev
        
        0
        
        1 June 2021 14: 55
        
        thanks, I'll look at the links, about efficiency and state participation ...
        
        Sergey Latyshev
        
        0
        
        1 June 2021 23: 50
        
        Looked, thanks.
        Little is new.
        
        And what are you all protesting against Civil Servant Chubas?
        Vet and Chubais, and Serdyukov, and Miller, and Sechin, and many others - these are all State leaders.
        
        And since State Capitalism triumphs, then they rule ...
        
        123
        
        +1
        
        2 June 2021 13: 08
        
        And what are you all protesting against Civil Servant Chubas?
        After all, Chubais, Serdyukov, Miller, Sechin and many others are all State leaders.
        
        I no longer protest. I'm just laughing .. Appointing the president's special envoy for relations with international organizations to achieve sustainable development goals is trolling. He will now work with his own people directly. Everyone understands everything.
        I will observe with interest the activities of the new revenge and the results.
        
        And since State Capitalism triumphs, then they rule ...
        
        And what about Belarus? Communism or what? What are the differences? What are you scaring them with?
        
        Sergey Latyshev
        
        0
        
        2 June 2021 13: 56
        
        Rage, if you want to.
        The Lord led, lead and will lead the country.
        
        And I can't scare RB with anything. Very far away.
        They are themselves