Karabakh: How Both Sides Try to Undermine Russia's Peacekeeping Efforts


On the territory of the Gegharkunik region of Armenia, the Azerbaijani military captured six Armenian soldiers who were performing engineering work in the border area: mining and installing appropriate warning signs. In response, according to the statements of Baku, the reconnaissance and sabotage group of the Armed Forces of Armenia tried to penetrate the territory of Azerbaijan, but was detained. The number of border incidents between the two irreconcilable adversaries is constantly growing, despite the reached trilateral armistice agreements. Is another escalation possible that could lead to the second, final round of the war for Nagorno-Karabakh?


Let's face it, yes, it is possible. The problem is that the key task facing official Baku and its allied Ankara to open a transport corridor through Armenia has not actually been achieved. We are talking about the Zangezur (Syunik) corridor. After the collapse of the USSR, the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic was cut off from the rest of Azerbaijan by the Syunik region of Armenia (Zangezur). During the Soviet period, a highway and a southern branch of the Transcaucasian railway functioned there. As a result of the first Nagorno-Karabakh war, which was successful for Yerevan, several Azerbaijani regions bordering Iran came under the control of Armenians, the land corridor was blocked, and the railroad track was completely dismantled. Transport links with the exclave of Baku could only be maintained by air or by transit through the neighboring Islamic Republic. The parties failed to find a compromise through peaceful negotiations.

Baku managed to resolve the problem in 2020 by military force, with the support of Ankara, defeating the Armenian army in just a month and a half and regaining control over most of Nagorno-Karabakh. In accordance with the trilateral agreements, Yerevan was supposed to open the land Zangezur (Syunik) corridor for Azerbaijan. This would give the winners a lot of "goodies". It is estimated that Azerbaijani exports will grow by more than $ 700 million annually. Baku will be able to save up to $ 10 million a year, which now has to be spent on subsidizing air flights to Nakhichevan, as well as on gas transit through Iran, where Tehran keeps up to 15% of the cost as payment for its services. Well, Turkey would get through the territory of its ally a land corridor to the Caspian Sea, where tempting prospects of creating a "logistic superpower" open up.

So, more than half a year has passed since the end of the military defeat of Armenia, but things are still there. In Yerevan, the opening of a transport corridor through the Syunik region is associated with the extradition of all prisoners of war. They refuse in Baku, believing that the Armenian soldiers detained after the declaration of an armistice are "saboteurs and terrorists." One can understand why Yerevan is actually evading the fulfillment of its obligations. The problem lies in the not fully regulated legal status of the Syunik region. Rather, each side interprets this status differently and considers the cards referred to by the opponents as "fakes". The Armenians are quite rightly afraid that after the opening of the transport corridor and the start of the construction of the road, Azerbaijan will actually take possession of the disputed strategically important region and at the same time cut it off from the Iranian border. Baku, as a winner, demands its own:

We are implementing the Zangezur Corridor, whether Armenia wants it or not. If he wants, then we will decide easier, if he does not want, we will decide by force. Just as before and during the war, I said that they must free themselves from our lands, or we will expel them by force. And so it happened. The same will be the fate of the Zangezur corridor.

A certain dizziness from the success of President Aliyev is clearly evident. The Azerbaijani military was recently brought into the territory of the disputed Syunik region. Former Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who is participating in the new election campaign, in turn demands from the CSTO to take all necessary measures so that Baku withdraw all its soldiers from the Armenian land. The conflict is obvious and insoluble by peaceful means. Azerbaijan and Turkey never got what the second Nagorno-Karabakh war was started to a large extent for. And why does everyone think that they will endlessly endure it? Baku has enough strength for the second round, and now there is not even a legitimate government in Yerevan.

The key question is how the Kremlin will behave in this case, which side will the Russian peacekeepers on the territory of the unrecognized republic take? During the "one and a half month war" of 2020, Moscow was emphatically neutral so as not to spoil its relations with Azerbaijan and Turkey, so why should something be different this time? And after all, formally, the Kremlin is right to distance itself from this long-standing interethnic conflict. The problem is that this is shaking the foundation of the CSTO, within which Russia and Armenia are military allies. Yerevan defiantly sent an appeal to this organization with a request to take measures to expel the Azerbaijani military from the territory of the Syunik region. She is still studying the issue. In response, Nikol Pashinyan threatened to contact other structures:

Armenia does not exclude the possibility of appealing to the UN Security Council if the CSTO instruments do not allow solving the problem at the border.

The willingness of the Armenian leadership to resolve the issue through the head of the CSTO and the Kremlin, to put it mildly, does not work in the best way for the international image of this organization and Russia, around which it was actually created. In fact, our country itself becomes a hostage to its own policy "Multi-vector", for which we traditionally scold Belarus.
Ad
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 29 May 2021 16: 03
    +2
    Karabakh: How Both Sides Try to Undermine Russia's Peacekeeping Efforts

    Russian border troops have increased their presence in Zangezur (Syunik region). Russian Ambassador to Armenia Sergei Kopyrkin stated this yesterday, ..... the official press release of the Russian Embassy in Armenia.

    The introduction of a new contingent of border troops is associated with an exacerbation on the border of Azerbaijan with Armenia.

    Russian border guards in Armenia, according to the ambassador, are serving with a multiply increased workload.

    Two days ago, Pashinyan made a proposal to bring a peacekeeping contingent from the countries of the Minsk Group to the border. It contains the phrase “together with Russian peacekeepers. Pashinyan’s former desire to get hold of the American contingent is evident.

    Acting Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan proposed to place international observers representing Russia on the border with Azerbaijan or another country - the co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group
  2. Binder Offline Binder
    Binder (Miron) 29 May 2021 17: 06
    -1
    It seems that in this situation the Armenians are making a serious mistake, ignoring the fulfillment of their obligations to provide the Azerbaijani side with a land corridor to Nakhichevan. Aliyev is right in speaking of his determination to resolve the problem by military means - as it turns out, the Armenians do not voluntarily intend to fulfill the peace agreements. What are they counting on in Yerevan, is there anyone else hoping that the Russians will fight the Azerbaijanis for the interests of Armenia? And they also say that the Armenians are an ancient wise people ... Where is that wisdom?
  3. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 29 May 2021 18: 43
    +1
    Hello!
    Father, rest in peace, told. During the Soviet Union I traveled from Tbilisi to Baku along this railway track.
    What is remembered. On the Armenian side, the borders of the village glow, on the Turkish side it is dark. The natural question is why? Answer from Georgian and Armenian colleagues. The Turks remember about the lease agreement, so these territories are not being developed.
    1. kapitan92 Offline kapitan92
      kapitan92 (Vyacheslav) 29 May 2021 19: 13
      0
      Quote: Petr Vladimirovich
      Father, rest in peace, told. During the Soviet Union I traveled from Tbilisi to Baku along this railway track.

      We are talking about the Baku-Julfa (Nakhichevan) railway line
      Which side is Tbilisi here?
      1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 29 May 2021 19: 50
        +1
        Yes, the most that neither is direct. In Tbilisi, I flew on a plane on business trips, then a train to Yerevan, then to Nakhichevan, from there to Baku ...
    2. Bakht Offline Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 29 May 2021 19: 43
      +1
      There was not and there is no lease agreement.
      1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 30 May 2021 17: 03
        +1
        Salam, buddy!
        I agree!

        The Moscow Treaty (tur. Moskova Anlaşması) is a "treaty of friendship and brotherhood" signed on March 16, 1921 in Moscow by representatives of the government of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey and the government of the RSFSR. The treaty established the northeastern border of Turkey, which exists to this day.

        “Having transferred to Turkey the large territories conquered by the Russian Empire, and in fact betrayed the Armenians, the Bolshevik-Leninists hoped that Turkey would become a fraternal socialist country for them. But that did not happen. Turkey followed the path of bourgeois nationalism, and during the Second World War it became a “neutral” ally of Nazi Germany, ”says research historian Alexander Mosyakin. - At the 1945 Potsdam Conference, Stalin tried to correct the mistakes made by Lenin and demanded that the territories of Western Armenia with Mount Ararat be transferred to the Soviet Union (Armenian SSR). But the allies did not agree to this.
        1. Shmurzik Offline Shmurzik
          Shmurzik (Seymslav) 30 May 2021 17: 32
          0
          territories conquered by the Russian Empire, and actually betraying the Armenians

          And where are the Armenians ????
  4. Shmurzik Offline Shmurzik
    Shmurzik (Seymslav) 29 May 2021 20: 26
    +1
    Yerevan associates the opening of a transport corridor through the Syunik region with the extradition of all prisoners of war

    Armenia did not fight ... - what prisoners of war ??? Especially taken after the war and after the deadline for the withdrawal of troops ????
    Enlighten who is in the subject?
    1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 30 May 2021 17: 09
      +2
      Except the respected author, no one ... fellow