Does the Russian military have the right to jam the American reconnaissance RQ-4 Global Hawk

Over the past few years, American manned and unmanned reconnaissance aircraft have become a constant and unwelcome guest in the Black Sea and over the Nezalezhnaya steppes. The US Air Force Northrop Grumman RQ-4B-40 GlobalHawk UAVs take off from the Sigonella airbase in Italy, fly over the Russian southern border, then along the Crimea head to the contact line in Donbas, and then return back with intelligence. In fact, this has already become a permanent US Air Force watch over the Black Sea water area and Ukraine. Recently, however, various troubles have begun to occur with American UAVs.

So, at the end of April 2021, during a recent large-scale military exercise, which was organized by the Russian Ministry of Defense near the Ukrainian border, several RQ-4 Global Hawks circled over the South-East of this country at once, carefully observing everything that was happening. Suddenly, one of the scouts gave a signal 7600 (loss of communication) and was forced to make a U-turn, rapidly retiring in the opposite direction. On May 18, something similar happened again. Another American drone with tail number 11-2049 and callsign FORTE10 initially followed the usual route, but in the area of ​​the city of Izyum in the Kharkiv region, it abruptly changed its route to Pavlograd - Dnepr - Nikolaev, also making a 180-degree turn. Given that both RQ-4 Global Hawks are too close to the Russian border, it is believed that they could have been exposed to electronic warfare from our side. But is this so, and what does international law say about this?

If you look at the comments of readers in the domestic media, then many of them directly call for the "jamming" of American intelligence officers. I would like to remind you that this topic we have to a certain extent already concernedanalyzing the call of a retired Russian admiral to attack US Navy destroyers entering the Black Sea using electronic warfare methods. Then we came to the conclusion that this is not a good idea, since American warships enter the water area and stay in it for 21 days in strict accordance with the Montreux Convention. As long as the Donald Cook or Porter remain in international waters and do not violate our state border, an electronic warfare attack on them by the RF Ministry of Defense will be considered a type of military aggression, which, if Washington wishes, can be interpreted by it as a casus belli.

Then a natural question arises: is an electronic warfare attack on American reconnaissance UAVs located in international airspace or in the skies over Ukraine with the permission of Kiev a "Russian aggression"? The question is extremely controversial.

On the one handThe RQ-4 Global Hawk performs quite legal reconnaissance activities. In accordance with articles 13 of the Russian law "On foreign intelligence", our own intelligence officers have the right to use information systems, video and audio recording, film and photography, information retrieval from technical communication channels, as well as other methods and means. The American Global Hawk is a strategic reconnaissance aircraft crammed with appropriate spy equipment. It is equipped with an integrated surveillance and reconnaissance system HISAR (Hughes Integrated Surveillance & Reconnaissance), SAR / MTI radar, optical and infrared sensor. This equipment makes it possible to obtain radar images of the terrain with a resolution of 1 meter, as well as to detect ground-based moving objects. All received data is transmitted from the drone via a broadband satellite channel at a speed of up to 50 Mbit / s or to a ground-based receiving transmitter in the line of sight. While in international or Ukrainian airspace with the permission of the authorities of this country, American military intelligence officers do not formally violate anything.

On the other hand, we do not live in some ideal, but in the real world, where the United States is waging a new "Cold War" against our country. The RQ-4 Global Hawk, as well as American and British reconnaissance aircraft, are studying the combat capabilities of the Russian army in Crimea and on the Ukrainian border for a reason. The fight, or "duel", between American and Russian intelligence services has a very long history. If we turn again to the already mentioned law "On Foreign Intelligence" of the Russian Federation, then it says that in the process of intelligence activities, the foreign intelligence agencies of the Russian Federation can use both overt and covert methods and means:

The procedure for using secret methods and means of intelligence activity is determined by federal laws and regulatory legal acts of the foreign intelligence agencies of the Russian Federation. The content of normative legal acts on the use of covert methods and means of intelligence activity is a state secret.

In other words, we cannot judge what "secret methods and means" can be used to hinder the reconnaissance activities of a potential adversary. We also do not know if they were actually used against both RQ-4 Global Hawks, which flew too close to the Russian state border and the places of concentration of the Russian Armed Forces. One can only guess about this. However, we know for sure that technical the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has an opportunity for this.

So, in 2020, a real "anti-drone shield" was deployed in the Kaliningrad region. According to the specialized Polish publication Defense24, the exercises of the Baltic Fleet practiced the fight against foreign attack UAVs, such as the American MQ-9 Reaper deployed in Estonia:

The Russians practiced protecting their own command post from attack by attack unmanned aerial vehicles from a potential enemy.

To do this, in the Kaliningrad region, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation deployed a real electronic warfare dome, which gives our military many opportunities. First, Russian complexes can suppress the control channels of enemy UAVs and the transfer of intelligence from them. Secondly, even the satellite communication signal may be violated, as a result of which the control equipment of the drone will accumulate errors in determining its location. Thirdly, by combining these methods, it is possible to deceive the control system of the UAV, gradually changing its coordinates to false ones and taking it away from the route to the one needed by our military. In general, draw your own conclusions.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. George W. Bush - medium (George Bush - average) 19 May 2021 12: 18
    It's good that Russia doesn't have any complexes.
    Except missile ... tongue
  2. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 19 May 2021 12: 23
    in strict accordance with the Montreux Convention.

    Well, if you are such a legalist, let the United States or you provide evidence of an electronic warfare attack. Lost connection is an abstract concept. You can think anything you want.

    The American Global Hawk is a strategic reconnaissance aircraft crammed with appropriate spy equipment.

    And why, then, in all countries they do not like spies so much? They send me out, they try and they give me decent terms. Everything related to the security of the country everywhere and not only here is perceived very painfully. And there is no need to ask yourself the philosophical questions "to be or not to be." Spies, if possible, should be destroyed or neutralized, and believe me, there will be fewer problems and there will be no headaches! And for this, all methods are good!
  3. Tektor Offline Tektor
    Tektor (Tektor) 19 May 2021 12: 43
    Since this issue is not regulated by any agreements, then you can jam when you want. Especially when conducting exercises.
  4. General Black Offline General Black
    General Black (Gennady) 19 May 2021 14: 13
    terrestrial receiving transmitter

    In common people this thing is called - "repeater".
  5. Lime Bayun_2 Offline Lime Bayun_2
    Lime Bayun_2 (Lime Bayun) 19 May 2021 17: 39
    What's the problem then ?? Change the navigation coordinates to false ones, as written here, to enter our territory and officially knock them off .. But fig did you guys fly to us? And let them prove that something was changed for them ...
  6. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 19 May 2021 20: 49
    Can you, dear colleagues?
    In aircraft modeling recently, 10 years. Always German visuals, you fly the C11 complex and rejoice.
    There are friends who muddied FPV, it is actually flying cameras.
    All these drones are the same, only more.
    Control on one channel, telemetry on another, return to the point, if the connection is lost, by GPS.
  7. Observer2014 Offline Observer2014
    Observer2014 19 May 2021 21: 17
    The most interesting topic of the article! For a long time I asked myself a similar question: What is an attack in the modern world, and how to position such things if the methods of attack have gone so far ahead. Questions of a similar subject. There is a reason for international agreements. So far, it is unambiguous to the question voiced in the title of the article. It is not possible to answer. You can only count on the prudence of your opponents. Everything.
  8. Tedi Offline Tedi
    Tedi (Tedi) 30 May 2021 22: 05
    in the right to jam objects in the sphere of interests of Russia at the distance that ensures compliance with the non-receipt by the other party of information about everything that is on the territory of Russia
  9. Kedrovich Offline Kedrovich
    Kedrovich (Alexa980) 1 June 2021 22: 29
    It is possible and necessary to jam. These flying machines are visible through 130 km. They can be drawn to the Don from which we and the Americans came out. This means that you cannot fly and scout even from the adjacent territory.