The expert called Russia's actions in the event of the deployment of US troops in Ukraine


Some "hot heads" of the Ukrainian policy dream of deploying NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine. For example, the former head of the country's foreign affairs department, Pavel Klimkin, proposes to deploy US military personnel in Odessa and Mariupol, who are currently being withdrawn from Afghanistan. The former commander of the "Vostok" battalion of the DPR, Alexander Khodakovsky, shared his thoughts on this in an interview with the newspaper "Ukraine.ru".


According to the expert, if Washington decides to deploy its combat units in Ukraine, Moscow will recognize the DPR and LPR as independent states and will deploy its troops and weapons there. In this case, an open military confrontation between Russia and Ukraine is hardly possible, since the Russians and Americans will not start a nuclear war with each other, even if the interests of Kiev are at stake.

When US troops and their allies enter Ukraine, the situation on the line of contact of the parties in Donbass will become an "eternally frozen conflict" with no prospects for a quick solution.

Earlier, Khodakovsky noted the high likelihood of a resumption of active hostilities in the LPR, since the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the militias have too many fundamental differences - the parties to the conflict will not be able to overcome them until one of them gains the upper hand over the other. The solution of this problem by political and diplomatic methods is hardly possible.
Ad
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) April 26 2021 10: 47
    +2
    And on whose side will the part of Donbass, on which the Ukrainian Armed Forces are located?
    1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
      Just a cat (Bayun) April 26 2021 12: 09
      +1
      how they knocked with helmets, demanding a salary from Zeltsman (Waltzman), they will knock. The fact that there was no one better than a Russian sergeant and a hunter from Abkhazia to be the commander of the militia says a lot.
  2. Dust Offline Dust
    Dust (Sergei) April 26 2021 13: 13
    +6
    If the United States begins to deploy its troops in Ukraine, this is a war. After all, everyone understands very well that military bases need to be guarded. So there will be Patriots, various protection systems. Then there will be hotheads who will deploy nuclear weapons ... This is a real threat to Russia. Remember the Cuban missile crisis, the Americans were not joking, they really planned to destroy Cuba with a nuclear strike, together with Soviet missiles. In Russia, I hope they understand this, even when trying to deploy US troops, the Ukrainian regime will sign a death sentence.
    1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) April 26 2021 13: 31
      0
      Place your troops first. Then deploy troops to protect the deployed troops and so on ad infinitum ... As in Afghanistan ... fellow
      1. Kofesan Offline Kofesan
        Kofesan (Valery) April 27 2021 17: 33
        -1
        So they are already there. Silently. From strategic bombers that freely use the airspace of non-brothers, which simply are not supposed to be based 10 km from the border, to instructors, etc. That is, to those who are called "lodgers" ..

        The question is how many? So this is not the one that is appropriate. And it is appropriate to ask when there will be a critical number of them for the leader of Russia? Quantity and quality.

        So that is why the penetration of that very "sly" occurs in order to blur the "red lines" until they disappear. And the lines are, first of all, in the heads. If they are violated, the consequences follow. The offender is the aggressor. Retribution is deserved.

        And if the consequences come with full confidence on the part of the amers that they (red lines) are absent or they are hard to see (and this will certainly be the case with a gradual build-up of troops in Ukraine), then they will definitely call it "aggression." We know that this is not so. But presenting us as the "attackers" as the first for the United States will not rust. But this is dangerous, dangerous to give the opportunity to crawl these lines with impunity. This is the temptation that NATO is already clearly and obviously aware of. And then they (the West) will portray themselves as victims of "Putin and Russia."

        It is dangerous to announce the presence of red lines and do nothing in response.

        This is what they strive for. Then everything turns upside down. The perpetrator is the victim, and the retaliation is "aggression." So you have to silently swallow everything, up to. deployment of nuclear missiles ...

        This is how they manage to lead the Kremlin oligarchy by the nose.
    2. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) April 26 2021 18: 36
      -4
      Quote: Dust
      Remember the Cuban missile crisis, the Americans were not joking, they really planned to destroy Cuba with a nuclear strike, together with Soviet missiles.

      The Americans had something to be nervous about. Until that moment, the USSR was not able to deliver nuclear weapons on US territory, while the American army was able to destroy all the more or less large cities of the USSR.
      1. isofat Offline isofat
        isofat (isofat) April 26 2021 19: 01
        0
        He wants, but cannot - impotent. Maybe, but he doesn't want - you bastard. There is no other choice for the United States. laughing
      2. kapitan92 Offline kapitan92
        kapitan92 (Vyacheslav) April 26 2021 23: 39
        +3
        Quote: Oleg Rambover
        Until that moment, the USSR was not able to deliver nuclear weapons on US territory, while the American army was able to destroy all the more or less large cities of the USSR.

        I don't quite agree with you. Undoubtedly, the United States in 62g by the availability of delivery vehicles was in the role of a "heavyweight" boxer, especially considering the number of ICBMs.
        In 1962, the States had the Thor and Jupiter MRBMs deployed in Britain, Italy and Turkey.
        radius 2400 km. The main targets for the "Thor" and "Jupiter" missiles were to be military bases and airfields of the USSR (the KVO of the missile was about 1 km).
        The USSR had R-5, R-12 and R-14 in Europe. The range of these missiles is about 1500-2500-4500 km, respectively. Their reliability and accuracy was, on average, lower than that of the US missiles. The standard KVO for R-12 is 5 km. In turn, to compensate for the low KVO, Soviet missiles carry more powerful warheads - R-12 and R-14 in 2,3 megatons. Targets, Germany, Turkey, England. Italy.
        ICBM: Atlas and Titan missiles. The United States has 141 ICBMs,
        USSR 4 R-7A ICBMs from Plesetsk and 20 R-16 missiles: (R16 10-12,5 thousand km)
        There were even calculations of losses in mutual strikes, now it is called mate. modeling.
        as a result of the exchange of strikes by the MRBM and ICBM alone, losses would have amounted to:

        Western Europe - 11 million people

        USA - 8 million

        USSR and Eastern Europe - MORE THAN 44 MILLION PEOPLE.

        Quote: Oleg Rambover
        The Americans had something to be nervous about.

        P 12, P 14,2500- 4500 km, heads of 1 mgtn were sent to Cuba. Planned 40 RSD.
        1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
          Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) April 27 2021 11: 30
          -3
          During the Caribbean crisis, the P16 were not yet in service, the only ICBMs are the P7. However, due to the preparation time for the start (17 hours), there was a big question whether they would have time to launch it. The probability of strategic bombers breaking through into the United States is rather low. They reached Europe without question, the United States had a good chance of avoiding a retaliatory strike. After the deployment of missiles in Cuba, such chances were nullified.
          1. kapitan92 Offline kapitan92
            kapitan92 (Vyacheslav) April 27 2021 13: 47
            +1
            Quote: Oleg Rambover
            During the Caribbean crisis, the P16 were not yet in service, the only ICBMs are the P7.

            R-16 (index of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Strategic Missile Forces - 8K64, according to the classification of the US Defense Ministry and NATO - SS-7 Saddler, literally Shornik) - intercontinental ballistic missile, in service with the Strategic Missile Forces of the USSR from 1962 to 1976-1977... The first Soviet two-stage ICBM on high-boiling propellants with an autonomous control system.
            12 September 1960 was put into service ICBM R-7A.
            Not to be confused with P 7. Start-up preparation time 2 hours.
            Learn the mat. part. hi
            1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
              Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) April 27 2021 16: 05
              -4
              On February 5, 1963, the first missile regiment (Nizhniy Tagil), armed with a DBK with these ICBMs, began to be put on alert, and on July 15 of the same year this complex was adopted by the Strategic Missile Forces.

              from Wiki about P16, so yes, learn materiel.
              It says here that 8 hours for P7A
              http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-750.html
              1. kapitan92 Offline kapitan92
                kapitan92 (Vyacheslav) April 27 2021 20: 52
                0
                For you, educational back is free for now. Until !

                53rd NIIP, Plesetsk (Arkhangelsk region) - seven launchers (including three - "V") in 1961-1975.
                97th brigade, pos. Itatka (Tomsk region) - six launchers (all ground-based) in 1962-1976;
                54th road, pos. Teikovo (Ivanovo region) - 12 launchers (all ground-based) in 1962-1976;
                52nd road, pos. Bershet (Perm region) - 13 launchers (including three - "V") in 1962-1976;
                42nd Rd, Verkhnyaya Salda (near Nizhny Tagil) - 20 launchers (including six - "B") in 1961-1976;
                8th Rd, Yurya (Kirov region) - 25 launchers (including nine - "B") in 1961-1977;
                Total in 1961 – 1966 more than 700 R-16s were produced at both enterprises.
  3. Tektor Offline Tektor
    Tektor (Tektor) April 26 2021 17: 11
    +2
    I absolutely disagree with the opinion of Khodakovsky: if you got into a conflict, you will get the best of it! Any "guest performers" on the territory of the banderlogia will be legitimate targets. Moreover, they must be wetted first so that they do not get in the way underfoot. And what idiots do you have to be to substitute yourself like that?
    1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) April 26 2021 19: 43
      -2
      This is from the heart! But why go far? Is there an ultrasound in the closet? As you see Russian tourists at the exit from Ben Gurion, so urine on your health ...
    2. Kofesan Offline Kofesan
      Kofesan (Valery) April 27 2021 17: 50
      -1
      The matter is small ... Possession of decisiveness that they need to be "wet". But with this at the hands of Russia - a pipe.
  4. shinobi Offline shinobi
    shinobi (Yuri) April 27 2021 02: 14
    +3
    How did the attempt to place a NATO base in Crimea end?
  5. kriten Offline kriten
    kriten (Vladimir) April 27 2021 15: 35
    0
    The Kremlin will tail its tail, bark and express deep concern. It is unlikely to go beyond demagoguery.
    1. Kofesan Offline Kofesan
      Kofesan (Valery) April 27 2021 17: 51
      -1
      I absolutely agree with you. 10 pluses for the accuracy of wording and capacious expressiveness ...
      1. Tektor Offline Tektor
        Tektor (Tektor) 4 May 2021 16: 29
        0
        As if to put it more mildly, you see the fonder, the situation has changed: Shoigu said that the army is ready ... Which was not even last year ...
        1. Kofesan Offline Kofesan
          Kofesan (Valery) 5 May 2021 02: 12
          0
          The key word "said" ... And in 2014, too, "it was not like last year"? What prevented from strangling the Banderva in the bud?

          Why then, today they are "ready", and in 2014, even the Federation Council "allowed" Putin to send troops ... then they were not ready? Today there is no permission - we are ready. Yesterday was - not ready.

          You can talk a lot ... for those licking and sucking on the budget, it causes euphoria. But to do ... The Kremlin has no real signs of "acting". No one goes to war in Italian ...

  6. Yuri Bryanskiy Offline Yuri Bryanskiy
    Yuri Bryanskiy (Yuri Bryansky) April 27 2021 18: 12
    +1
    Stupid. It is necessary to return the entire Donbass as part of Novorossiya.