Why is Russia opposed to the unification of the unrecognized republics of Donbass


With the onset of spring, the Kiev authorities are apparently preparing large-scale provocations against the unrecognized republics of eastern Ukraine. But why don’t the DPR and LPR unite in the face of a common enemy and oppose the APU by joint efforts?


The separate existence of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics is associated with the legal nuances of their possible unification, as well as the fact that Russia is opposed to this as an active member of the Minsk Group. This opinion is shared by the First Deputy Minister of Information of the DPR Daniil Bezsonov.

I think that they have not united, because in the Minsk agreements two signatures are better than one

- noted Bezsonov in an interview URA.RUadmitting the presence of other reasons for the reluctance of the republics to unite

In turn, the former Minister of Defense of the DPR Igor Strelkov expressed the idea that the authorities of the republics from the very beginning of their formation assumed the return of these territories under the jurisdiction of Kiev as regions with a special status. According to Strelkov, Moscow supported the unrecognized republics, but did not speak out for their unification. The ex-head of the defense department of the Donetsk People's Republic also stressed that he sees no point in the existence of the DPR and LPR in a common administrative unit.

The entities were prepared in the framework of the geopolitical confrontation between Russia and Ukraine

- says Strelkov.
Ad
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Cyril Offline Cyril
    Cyril (Kirill) 29 March 2021 15: 01
    -4
    The entities were prepared in the framework of the geopolitical confrontation between Russia and Ukraine

    Well, at least someone said it openly. And then "Novorossiya", "protection of the Russian-speaking population", "Return of Donbass to its native harbor."
    1. 123 Offline 123
      123 (123) 29 March 2021 15: 06
      0
      Now you two are truth-tellers.
      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
        Cyril (Kirill) 29 March 2021 17: 17
        -4
        Not true. Also, Poklonskaya recently noted herself.

        https://m.crimea.ria.ru/society/20210326/1119404318/Poklonskaya-otvetila-nedovolnym-obschestvennikam-iz-DNR.html

        Poklonskaya said that "the residents of Donbass do not know their purpose," and also that "someone is putting on a military uniform and shouting that Donbass is Russia."
        1. 123 Offline 123
          123 (123) 29 March 2021 17: 28
          +1
          Not true. Also, Poklonskaya recently noted herself.

          Do not lie.
          These are her words:

          Poklonskaya said that "the residents of Donbass do not know their purpose," and also that "someone is putting on a military uniform and shouting that Donbass is Russia."

          These are yours:

          The entities were prepared in the framework of the geopolitical confrontation between Russia and Ukraine

          Well, at least someone said it openly. And then "Novorossiya", "protection of the Russian-speaking population", "Return of Donbass to its native harbor."

          So there are still two of you. Don't act so nasty, don't lie.
          Those interested can see in more detail what she thinks about this.

          1. Cyril Offline Cyril
            Cyril (Kirill) 30 March 2021 03: 48
            -3
            I'm not lying. The phrases "Donbass residents do not know their purpose" and "someone is putting on a military uniform and shouting that Donbass is Russia" are clear evidence that she is skeptical about "Donbass's return to its native harbor."

            But in your rosy jingoistic reality, of course, it can express anything.
            1. 123 Offline 123
              123 (123) 30 March 2021 09: 38
              +1
              It is possible that

              she is skeptical about the "return of Donbass to its native harbor"

              This does not mean at all that

              The entities were prepared in the framework of the geopolitical confrontation between Russia and Ukraine

              But in your rosy jingoistic reality, of course, it can express anything.

              This is only in your compradoro-libertarian parallel reality, you understand anything as you want.
              You still cite Zhirinovsky's howl as confirmation. Surely he means the same thing and completely agree with you. laughing So there will be four of you. Dzhigurda may become the fifth. winked
              1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                Cyril (Kirill) 30 March 2021 10: 40
                -2
                If Poklonskaya is not sure about the declared goals of the formation of the LDNR, then at least it is likely that she realizes this:

                The entities were prepared in the framework of the geopolitical confrontation between Russia and Ukraine

                You still cite Zhirinovsky's howl as confirmation.

                Oh, Zhirinovsky's howl just love to pick up the defenders of the "Russian Spring". Well, like you.

                Dzhigurda may become the fifth.

                This is your authority too :)
                1. 123 Offline 123
                  123 (123) 30 March 2021 11: 25
                  +1
                  If Poklonskaya is not sure of the declared goals of the formation of the LDNR, then at least probablythat she is aware of this:

                  Too many assumptions. If she's not sure, then she probably realizes. This is exactly the same thing that she thinks so and said it.
                  These are your cockroaches in your head, possibly genetically modified.

                  Oh, Zhirinovsky's howl just love to pick up the defenders of the "Russian Spring". Well, like you.

                  Lizobians like you are more likely to accept the howl of jackals.

                  This is your authority too :)

                  Your spirit guide, by definition, cannot be authoritative for me. laughing
                  1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                    Cyril (Kirill) 30 March 2021 12: 05
                    -3
                    Lizobians like you are more likely to accept the howl of jackals.

                    The howl of jackals is at least more meaningful and meaningful than the laments of Zhirinovsky and the defenders of the "Russian spring" :)

                    Your spirit guide, by definition, cannot be authoritative for me.

                    It's strange that I didn't even remember about my alleged spiritual mentor, but you - yes :)
          2. A.Lex Offline A.Lex
            A.Lex (Secret information) 30 March 2021 08: 37
            +2
            I have another question - since when did the opinion of the adventurer Girkin become an EXPERT? A person who passed the defense and RUNNED from Donbass in general cannot be an expert a priori!
            And the author is the same "expert" as the "shooter", since he considers this adventurer an "expert".
            1. 123 Offline 123
              123 (123) 30 March 2021 11: 12
              +2
              There are many experts on the Internet, real and not. You have to look at the facts and draw conclusions.
  2. Igor Pavlovich Offline Igor Pavlovich
    Igor Pavlovich (Igor Pavlovich) 29 March 2021 15: 31
    -9
    The separate existence of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics is associated with the legal nuances of their possible unification

    - what are the "legal nuances" in illegal entities ???
    1. GRF Offline GRF
      GRF 29 March 2021 17: 10
      +4
      Everything is relative. With yours they are not legal, maybe someone else thinks so, with theirs they are legal.
      On the part of Russia, the Minsk Protocol was signed by the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Russian Federation to Ukraine Mikhail Zurabov, on the part of Ukraine - the former President Leonid Kuchma, who had a mandate from the country's leadership, on the part of the OSCE - the Swiss diplomat Heidi Tagliavini, on the part of the Luhansk People's Republic and the Donetsk People's Republic Republics - their heads Igor Plotnitsky and Alexander Zakharchenko, respectively

      Judging by this document, they, as equal signers, were recognized by many, even those who want to give up their words ...
      For me, this is the one who dodges his words - an illegal education.
  3. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 30 March 2021 14: 19
    +1
    It's simple. In the future, it is planned to join other regions to the LPNR in order to create a confederation.