Where did Putin cross the road for the US Democrats?

March 29 2021 26

Joseph Biden, insulting Putin, spoke not on his own behalf, but on behalf of the group that nominated him to the Olympus of power. And, above all, on behalf of the Democratic Party. Accordingly, Putin answered not so much to Biden as to this group. What is the reason for this?

In fact, there are two reasons.

1. Putin is constantly and steadily increasing political and the military weight of the Russian Federation in the international arena. Neither Democrats nor Republicans can do anything about it. What causes irritation, turning into hysteria.

2. When the Russian Federation is in trouble, like the squeezed-out buildings in the United States, there are many in the media who want to inflate such events and draw far-reaching conclusions from them about Russia's weakness.

All the clowning with these buildings took place in the summer - at the beginning of autumn 2017. By a strange coincidence, it was at this time that the investigation of the transaction on the transfer of Uranium One into the ownership of Russia was launched. It is likely that they tried to provoke Putin into harsh actions or force him to leak some information. At any cost, up to and including outright lawlessness. But they ran into the wrong one.

What is the problem?

The United States is clearly aware that the Russian Federation holds the world uranium market.

Rosatom extracts uranium "with two hands", one of which is called Atomredmetzoloto (ARMZ is responsible for mining in Russia), and the second - Uranium One, which produces another 4385 tons of uranium worldwide. If we add up the shares of ARMZ, Uranium One and Kazatomprom (Kazakhstan), then it will amount to 35,6% of world production. Moreover, these are the best deposits, with a high uranium content and large reserves. And the most effective technology, including the technology of in-situ leaching. Therefore, the production and processing costs are very low.

Rosatom has a complex hidden relationship with Kazatomprom, in which Rosatom is not a subordinate partner, but at least an equal partner. And the Canadian company Uranium One owns mining enterprises in Australia, Tanzania, Namibia, Kazakhstan, Canada, South Africa, and the USA.

When he was prime minister, free from the current duties of the president, V.V. Putin is preoccupied with uranium. That is, he never forgot about uranium, but after his speech in Munich (which the West preferred not to hear), he had to take decisive action. Preparation of Uranium One for turning into a sweet piece, with subsequent sale, went on before, but without visible participation of Russia.

For example, in 2005, Mr. Giustra, head of UrAsia Energy Ltd., met on business in Kazakhstan. By coincidence, Bill Clinton had a need to discuss human rights in general and in Kazakhstan in particular with Nursultan Nazarbayev. Why not combine two visits on Giustra's private jet? Clinton had a very meaningful conversation with Nazarbayev, and a few days later Mr. Justra's young company signed a preliminary deal giving her stakes in three uranium mines controlled by the state uranium agency Kazatomprom. And in 2007, the company merged with Uranium One, a then South African company with assets in Africa and Australia, in a $ 3,5 billion deal. The new company, which retained the Uranium One name, was controlled by UrAsia investors, including Jan Telfer, a Canadian who became chairman of the board of directors. Through a spokesman, Mr. Giustra, whose personal stake in the deal was estimated at about $ 45 million, said he sold his stake in 2007. And at the end of 2005, Mr. Giustra decided to do charity work and donated $ 31,3 million to the Clinton Foundation.

When the donation was leaked to the media, Giustra said he was proud to work with Mr. Clinton on philanthropy and urged the media to focus on poverty, health and the world's pressing issues.

Soon, Uranium One began buying up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, the company announced the purchase of a Utah uranium facility and uranium deposits in four Western states, followed shortly by the acquisition of Energy Metals Corporation and its subsidiaries in Wyoming, Texas and Utah. The deal made it clear that Uranium One intends to become the locomotive of the US uranium sector with the potential to become a near-monopoly domestic supplier to US nuclear facilities.

Since June 2009, Rosatom has started buying Uranium One shares. To begin with, 16%. In June 2010, it increased its share to 51%. It happened when Clinton was Secretary of State. It is clear that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with it, because her assistant was in charge of the transaction.

You never know what coincidences there are?

In June 2010, Bill Clinton was invited to speak at an investor conference in Moscow. And the bank Renaissance Capital paid him $ 500 for the show. And Clinton had a meeting with V.V. Putin.

And there are also political coincidences. For the United States, it was very critical to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons. And in June 2010, Russia signed a United Nations resolution to impose new tough sanctions against that country.

You can write a lot about such coincidences.

Since 2013, Uranium One is wholly owned by Rosatom and is simply its structural division. By then, Clinton was no longer Secretary of State. In 2013, the Democrats were also in power, and Clinton controlled the Democratic Party. It is clear that she personally did not influence the situation in any way. And Biden was the vice president. The undisclosed interest of his family in all kinds of minerals is well known.

But now the US share in world uranium production is no more than 1%. Of not the best deposits. And uranium consumption is 29,4% of the world level. And the US also has no access to its production outside the Russian-Kazakh conglomerate, the second place is held by the French with a share of 18%. The rest is already quite inferior deposits in different countries.
Therefore, we have to bow to Russia.

In the United States, this topic is very toxic. Trump desperately needed proof of the Clintons' corruption in the deal. Therefore, he tried very hard to squeeze such evidence out of Putin. Did not work out. This is understandable: where did Putin get the proof ...

Clinton herself had a big problem, using her personal mail for official purposes. She doesn't have a KGB school. But somehow everything settled down.

The FBI, the Justice Department, Congress, and the press were involved in this deal ...

Nothing legally worthwhile was found. Witnesses who are going to say something bad about the Clintons are somehow very unlucky in life. From the word "absolutely". Anyone can search the Internet for "the Clinton list", "The bloody harvest of the Clintons." So when Putin replied: "... he himself is called that", he knew what he was talking about. And there is nothing funny in this phrase.

They drank a lot of blood from the Democrats on this occasion. Everyone is offended that the Russians are mining all the best American uranium. It is clearly time to stop. And the Senate received a proposal to ban the import of Russian uranium. But, in connection with the elections, all hands will not reach in any way.

One could try to chop off Uranium One shares from Rosatom. But for some reason no one is doing this.

By coincidence, since the beginning of the transfer of ownership of Uranium One to Rosatom and some time after the complete transfer, $ 145 million has been transferred to the Clinton funds in various amounts. Of course, for charity, from people associated with the mining and processing industry. Including from the former owners and managers of Uranium One.

But the matter is the past, why remember? Therefore, in vain is Biden so about Putin. A good man, after all. And it is always pleasant for a good person to help. If he asks convincingly.

And Biden took and called him on March 17th. Earlier, on February 24, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) Land Quality Authority announced its approval of an on-site uranium mining permit (ISR) application filed by Uranium One, owned by Russian nuclear state corporation Rosatom.

It's a coincidence, of course, and Biden has nothing to do with it. Wyoming is.

Here's a version. Highly likely.

And only Biden himself can say for sure about this. "But it is not exactly".

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Oleg Rambover

-6

29 March 2021 09: 07

1. Putin is constantly and steadily increasing the political and military weight of the Russian Federation in the international arena. Neither Democrats nor Republicans can do anything about it. What causes irritation, turning into hysteria.

The United States could impose a complete embargo on oil supplies from the Russian Federation. Or gas. And then Vladimir Vladimirovich would not be up to the military weight of the Russian Federation.

All the clowning with these buildings took place in the summer - early fall of 2017. By a strange coincidence, it was at this time that the investigation of the transaction on the transfer of Uranium One into the ownership of Russia was launched.

Judging by the history of RUSAL, Derebaski, if desired, the United States can be very convincing in matters of company control.

From the article it appears that Putin and the Democrats have long and fruitfully cooperated. How he crossed the road to the democrats is not clear.
1. 123
  
  +5
  
  29 March 2021 09: 33
  
  The United States could impose a complete embargo on oil supplies from the Russian Federation. Or gas. And then Vladimir Vladimirovich would not be up to the military weight of the Russian Federation.
  
  They could have already announced. At the end of 2020, 7% of imports are Russian fuel oil. There is nothing to replace him, except that Maduro bows and ask for forgiveness. What gas embargo do you mean? To Europe? In 2020, Russia overtook the United States in LNG supplies there. Where else can they ban? In the US, supply where production declines after shutting in its own wells? Remains on SP-2 to spit from overseas
  
  Judging by the history of RUSAL, Derebaski, if desired, the United States can be very convincing in matters of company control.
  
  True? Is that why Rusal is now registered in Russia?
  
  From the article it appears that Putin and the Democrats have long and fruitfully cooperated. How he crossed the road to the democrats is not clear.
  
  After the first two examples, I'm not sure if the third one is worth disassembling.
  Hello ExerDame
  1. Oleg Rambover
    
    -4
    
    29 March 2021 11: 37
    
    Quote: 123
    They could have already announced. At the end of 2020, 7% of imports are Russian fuel oil.
    
    And?
    
    Quote: 123
    There is nothing to replace him, except that Maduro bows and ask for forgiveness.
    
    Maduro will run to Uncle Sam to sell oil for money without any forgiveness. Russian oil is not the only heavy oil in the world, and fuel oil is the remainder of the production of gasoline, kerosene, etc. In the end, reconfiguring American refineries for light oil is a feasible task. So it is not a set-off.
    
    Quote: 123
    What gas embargo do you mean? To Europe? In 2020, Russia overtook the United States in LNG supplies there. Where else can they ban? In the US, supply where production declines after shutting in its own wells? Remains on SP-2 to spit from overseas
    
    And I mean that, the United States has no desire to leave, as you say there, its European vassals, without Russian gas. What would the United States lose? Nothing, only benefited from the sale of their gas.
    In addition, if the United States really wanted to do it all, it would have done it during the Yeltsin era or Putin's first term, but nothing of the kind has actually been observed.
    
    Quote: 123
    True? Is that why Rusal is now registered in Russia?
    
    Judging by the fact that a Russian citizen was deprived of control over the company on orders from the White House, and the board of directors was reshaped to the tune of the same White House, the US government has great influence over this company.
    
    Quote: 123
    After the first two examples, I'm not sure if the third one is worth disassembling.
    Hello ExerDame
    
    Dadada ... You shouldn't do this at all, otherwise it will turn out as always.
    1. boriz
      
      +4
      
      29 March 2021 12: 13
      
      and fuel oil is the remainder of the production of gasoline, kerosene, etc.
      
      You even know that! However, they are buying. And it is in Russia.
      
      Russian oil is not the only heavy oil in the world,
      
      First, there is not much of it after Venezuela and Iran were sanctioned.
      Secondly, in terms of price / quality ratio, the Russian one is better. There is less sulfur than Saudi.
      Third, the logistics are more favorable, take a closer look. AND, , no need to drag through the Suez Canal.
      
      Maduro will run to Uncle Sam to sell oil for money without any forgiveness.
      
      Why, something is not running. Not called. Some of its oil is smuggled into the United States and sold to support Maduro's pants. So the Yankees began to track the tankers.
      To start communicating with Maduro is a loss of face for them. Just yesterday / the day before yesterday, Pence tried to expel the representative of Venezuela from the UN Security Council meeting. Nebenzya did not allow it. And in the same place, this representative was told that he had no right to be there, the representative of Guaidó should sit. How will they buy oil from Maduro after that?
      1. Oleg Rambover
        
        -2
        
        29 March 2021 18: 12
        
        Quote: boriz
        You even know that! However, they are buying. And it is in Russia.
        
        It's strange if you want to limit the "political and military weight of the Russian Federation." As if one contradicts the other.
        
        Quote: boriz
        First, there is not much of it after Venezuela and Iran were sanctioned.
        Secondly, in terms of price / quality ratio, the Russian one is better. There is less sulfur than Saudi.
        Third, the logistics are more favorable, take a closer look. And, no need to drag through the Suez Canal.
        
        These are all such trifles if you want to destroy the enemy. If just a commercial relationship, then yes, it is quite logical.
        
        Quote: boriz
        Why, something is not running. Not called. Some of its oil is smuggled into the United States and sold to support Maduro's pants. So the Yankees began to track the tankers.
        To start communicating with Maduro is a loss of face for them. Just yesterday / the day before yesterday, Pence tried to expel the representative of Venezuela from the UN Security Council meeting. Nebenzya did not allow it. And in the same place, this representative was told that he had no right to be there, the representative of Guaidó should sit. How will they buy oil from Maduro after that?
        
        This means that it is more important for the Americans not to "lose face" or topple Maduro than to limit the economic opportunities of the Russian Federation (from which the military also follows).
        
        boriz
        
        +2
        
        29 March 2021 19: 39
        
        It's strange if you want to limit the "political and military weight of the Russian Federation." As if one contradicts the other.
        
        Where can they go? We need oil of good quality and affordable price. Their refineries are tuned to the Venezuelan one. The restructuring of one distillation column at the refinery, as I heard from Martsinkevich, is $ 500 million. More dear to yourself. The optimal replacement is Urals with the addition of our fuel oil.
        
        These are all such trifles if you want to destroy the enemy. If just a commercial relationship, then yes, it is quite logical.
        
        What does it mean to destroy? It is unrealistic by military means, but it is not possible economically. You have to coexist. Now even the Democrats have understood this. But if they continue such an internal economic policy, they will not even pull the regional leader. Then it will be Brazil.
        
        This means that it is more important for the Americans not to "lose face" or topple Maduro than to limit the economic opportunities of the Russian Federation (from which the military also follows).
        
        I want it all together, but nothing happens at all. Sadness ...
        
        Oleg Rambover
        
        -2
        
        30 March 2021 01: 18
        
        Quote: boriz
        Where can they go? We need oil of good quality and affordable price. Their refineries are tuned to the Venezuelan one. The restructuring of one distillation column at the refinery, as I heard from Martsinkevich, is $ 500 million. More dear to yourself. The optimal replacement is Urals with the addition of our fuel oil.
        
        Once again, if this is a confrontation for destruction, then the question of money is secondary.
        for 0,5 billion you can buy a Kirishi oil refinery together with the city of Kirishi.
        
        Quote: boriz
        What does it mean to destroy? It is unrealistic by military means, but it is not possible economically. You have to coexist. Now even the Democrats have understood this. But if they continue such an internal economic policy, they will not even pull the regional leader. Then it will be Brazil.
        
        They did not try to do it by military means. Economic ... with the USSR it turned out, and the Russian Federation has fewer resources.
        When the Russian Federation catches up with Brazil in terms of GDP, then we will talk about the regional powers.
        
        Quote: boriz
        I want it all together, but nothing happens at all. Sadness ...
        
        Dadada ... The US is run by people with developmental delays. Once they became the world's only superpower is unclear. Who are the others then?
        
        boriz
        
        +2
        
        30 March 2021 21: 55
        
        The only problem is that people who are not as brave as you are in the US leadership.
    2. 123
      
      +2
      
      29 March 2021 12: 40
      
      And?
      
      Do you learn letters?
      
      Maduro will run to Uncle Sam to sell oil for money without any forgiveness. Russian oil is not the only heavy oil in the world, and fuel oil is the remainder of the production of gasoline, kerosene, etc. In the end, reconfiguring American refineries for light oil is a feasible task. So it is not a set-off.
      
      Something you have a fantasy played out they can block everything but do not block it, Maduro will run, but for some reason he does not run. I am glad that you understand what fuel oil is. You are on the right track. It remains to knock the remaining nonsense out of you. This is just such a St. Petersburg bum and layman as you can think that the Americans will rush to "reconfigure" the oil refinery. It's not for you to twist the strings on a balalaika The plant is being built for certain raw materials, it costs colossal money and a lot of time to remake. In addition, there is not one small factory, I have heard at least three.
      The Americans indulge in sanctions if they are not affected, only slaves introduce them to their detriment, because they do it on instructions and their bosses do not mind.
      If they can easily replace Russian oil, why haven't they done so yet?
      
      And I mean that, the United States has no desire to leave, as you say there, its European vassals, without Russian gas. What would the United States lose? Nothing, only benefited from the sale of their gas.
      In addition, if the United States really wanted to do it all, it would have done it during the Yeltsin era or Putin's first term, but nothing of the kind has actually been observed.
      
      Why would they do this during the Yeltsin era or Putin's first term? They believed that it was all theirs now. When we realized what was happening, it was already too late.
      
      Judging by the fact that a Russian citizen was deprived of control over the company on orders from the White House, and the board of directors was reshaped to the tune of the same White House, the US government has great influence over this company.
      
      There is nothing to register enterprises anywhere. Now it is at home. What do they control?
      
      Dadada ... You shouldn't do this at all, otherwise it will turn out as always.
      
      Maybe you're right. I won't. why humiliate you?
      1. Oleg Rambover
        
        -1
        
        30 March 2021 14: 29
        
        Quote: 123
        Do you learn letters?
        
        Yes, the main thing is not to be nervous.
        
        Quote: 123
        Something you have a fantasy played out all overlap can but do not overlap, Maduro will run, but for some reason does not run. I am glad that you understand what fuel oil is. You are on the right track. It remains to knock the remaining nonsense out of you. This is just such a St. Petersburg bum and layman as you can think that the Americans will rush to "reconfigure" the oil refinery. It's not for you to twist the strings on a balalaika. The plant is being built for certain raw materials, it costs colossal money and a lot of time to remake. In addition, there is not one small factory, I have heard about at least three.
        
        Are you going to beat the crap out of me? Health is enough, and then you have so much bile, I'm worried about you.
        You really decide whether the US is waging a war of destruction with the Russian Federation or counts the proceeds from the factories.
        
        Quote: 123
        The Americans indulge in sanctions if they are not affected, only slaves introduce them to their detriment, because they do it on instructions and their bosses do not mind.
        
        About slaves are you talking about Russian food sanctions? I agree with that, you can't argue with that.
        
        Quote: 123
        If they can easily replace Russian oil, why haven't they done so yet?
        
        Why should they give up Russian oil? This is about the same song as about irreplaceable Russian engines for the United States. The Russian Federation is happy to exchange oil for your favorite green candy wrappers. It turns out cheaper than the Suadis. And the fantasies that the United States dreams of destroying the Russian Federation and seizing its natural resources exist only on federal channels and the brains of people with disabilities.
        
        Quote: 123
        Why would they do this during the Yeltsin era or Putin's first term? They believed that it was all theirs now. When we realized what was happening, it was already too late.
        
        Again, please, talk nonsense. Whoever thought what, again your fantasies.
        I read the CIA forecast of the beginning of 2000, where they predicted the growth of authoritarianism in the Russian Federation and problems in relations.
        
        Quote: 123
        There is nothing to register enterprises anywhere. Now it is at home. What do they control?
        
        https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/articles/2019/01/28/792559-novie-litsa
        Something was wrong, I imagined an independent company when the board of directors is coordinated with the US Treasury.
        
        Quote: 123
        Maybe you're right. I won't. why humiliate you?
        
        You are funny. Usually it turns out the other way around, poking your nose.
        By the way, how is your Agorophobia?
        
        123
        
        0
        
        30 March 2021 15: 18
        
        Are you going to beat the crap out of me? Health is enough, and then you have so much bile, I'm worried about you.
        
        Worry about your health, the presence of foolishness in your head does not strengthen it. Do not worry about bile either, I will pour out the surplus on you
        
        You really decide whether the US is waging a war of destruction with the Russian Federation or counts the proceeds from the factories.
        
        Only 2 extremes fit in your head? Black and white, what "half-tones"?
        Well, this is your problem, then try to figure it out, ask why the United States does not rebuild factories, but continues to buy raw materials from Russia for them.
        Who and when declared war in Russia?
        
        About slaves are you talking about Russian food sanctions? I agree with that, you can't argue with that.
        
        How do you argue? you are a slave, who is interested in your opinion? If you have a memory problem, let me remind you that sanctions were imposed by Europe and other lackeys like Ukraine, Russia responded with counter-sanctions. And in my opinion it is quite successful. Agriculture is developing, and let Europe chew her own.
        
        Why should they give up Russian oil? This is about the same song as about irreplaceable Russian engines for the United States. The Russian Federation is happy to exchange oil for your favorite green candy wrappers. It turns out to be cheaper than that of the Suadis.
        
        Is your "RAM" full? The paragraph above told about the war of destruction. Russia is exchanging oil for candy wrappers, because everyone is used to paying with them, but the situation is gradually changing. And he buys something useful with them, the candy wrappers are kept less and less. By the way, I do not like them, but I left one for myself as a keepsake, so as not to forget what kind of money there used to be.
        
        And the fantasies that the United States dreams of destroying the Russian Federation and seizing its natural resources exist only on federal channels and the brains of people with disabilities.
        
        And what do they dream about in your fantasies and other people with developmental delays?
        
        Again, please, talk nonsense. Whoever thought what, again your fantasies.
        I read the CIA forecast of the beginning of 2000, where they predicted the growth of authoritarianism in the Russian Federation and problems in relations.
        
        And how is the "growth of authoritarianism" expressed? Relationship problems are not difficult to predict if you create them yourself or behave in such a way that they are inevitable.
        
        Something was wrong, I imagined an independent company when the board of directors is coordinated with the US Treasury.
        
        Article for 2019. Do you have a slow Internet, information arrives with delays?
        
        So you imagine a company coordinating everything with the American Treasury?
        https://www.interfax-russia.ru/northwest/news/rusal-zaregistrirovalsya-v-sar-v-kaliningrade-na-ostrove-oktyabrskiy
        
        Everything is just as I said, there is nothing for the company to register anywhere, you will be tormented to swallow dust. The end of the phrase is no longer I said In general, hello to the Ministry of Finance.
        
        You are funny. Usually it turns out the other way around, poking your nose.
        By the way, how is your Agorophobia?
        
        Grow the pumpkin first. My "Agorophobia" exists exclusively in your head, probably caught on to something. Try blowing out the container.
        
        By the way, once they recalled ... there are more and more questions about the economic activities of the center and its enterprises.
        
        LLC "Management Company" Center "" (Yekaterinburg) requires from the Fund "Presidential Center B.N. Yeltsin "(Yekaterinburg) compensation for unpaid maintenance work at the Yeltsin Center during the pandemic. Information about the claim is contained in the file of the Arbitration Court of the Sverdlovsk Region.
        
        https://ura.news/news/1052469676
2. boriz
  
  +2
  
  29 March 2021 12: 00
  
  How he crossed the road to the democrats is not clear.
  
  It seems to be clearly written. This topic surfaced in 2015. It caused a lot of noise and numerous investigations. There are, in fact, much more facts, I just did not want to overblow the post.
  In 2017. Trump led a very active campaign to put Hillary in prison. But it didn't work out. For Democrats, the best option in this case is to go into the mud, to stop all sorts of body movements. And here on you - Uranium One submits an application for a new deposit and this application is approved. Not long before the historic interview with Putin being declared the murderer. Salt on wounds and reactions to it.
  
  The United States can be very convincing in matters of company control.
  
  This, by the way, can also be an echo. But "control" is not yet ownership. The situation is changing rapidly. And it is not changing in favor of the United States. A year ago, I spoke in comments about the upcoming division of the world into currency zones - I was perceived as abnormal. In the fall, this was announced by the director of the IMF. And now the US has openly declared this. The truth is, the statement is illiterate, without understanding who can lead such a zone and who cannot. So, at the right time, Rusal's directors will be replaced at the snap of their fingers. And no one will pay attention to it. Or even he will be nationalized.
  
  The US could impose a complete embargo on oil supplies from the Russian Federation.
  
  This is generally ridiculous. They drove themselves into this trap. Imports of Russian oil (and fuel oil) are only growing. And it is difficult to say how much of this oil is Russian and how much is Venezuelan. The United States simply cannot do without this oil. Refineries will not be able to operate normally and there will be no diesel fuel.
  By the way, this (about oil and fuel oil) very well characterizes the "green" aspirations of the United States.
Marzhecki

0

29 March 2021 09: 14

If you dig deeper, it's always because of the bucks
1. boriz
  
  +2
  
  29 March 2021 12: 15
  
  It's not just grandmothers. Uranium is a very strategic commodity. Granny, yes, it is very important, but when the issue affects the security of the state ...
Valery Bor

+2

29 March 2021 09: 35

Add to this the withdrawal of the Russian Federation from the agreement on the supply of Russian weapons-grade uranium to the United States, which entered into force on March 1 of this year, and then it will become clear that Putin has put checkmate on the issue of uranium mining by the Americans!
steelmaker

-1

29 March 2021 19: 51

increases the political and military weight of the Russian Federation in the international arena.

Without a flag and anthem, is it political weight? And if not for the Soviet "galoshes", where would this military weight be? Its built in single copies, for parades.

By a strange coincidence

The whole article, instead of facts, just coincidences. Instead of arguments, putting an "owl on the globe". Conclusion, and what conclusion can be drawn from this sycophant - Putin is a genius! Only this genius for closest friends. And the people are miserable wages, pensions, high loans, higher prices for gasoline, electricity, housing and communal services, etc. When will Putin's genius affect the well-being of the common people? After all, every Thursday the whole country collects money for sick children.
If Putin pursued the right policy, it would still lead to the well-being of the people, at least in some way. And so, you can praise Putin even how much, from this the minimum wage and pension will not be higher. So who did you write this complimentary article for? Your article will be appreciated only by sycophants and mediocrity.
1. Valery Bor
  
  +3
  
  29 March 2021 21: 08
  
  steelmaker Sycophants and mediocrity, you say? Your little opus is no different from the usual liberal stench paid for because of a big puddle - why does Russia need missiles and tanks, new weapons, who are you going to threaten, but there are only friends and brothers around, they only want peace for us - better give it to your grandmothers and orphans more money! And about the hatred of Putin, who did not bow before your masters, I generally keep quiet - this is already from a series of dying convulsions. Military weight from old Soviet galoshes? Well, check out these old galoshes of ours, maybe they are already completely rusted with us? What then are you afraid of? Come to us with your "world", we are all mediocrities and sycophants, we will run out towards us with flowers and loaves!
  1. steelmaker
    
    0
    
    29 March 2021 21: 35
    
    Don't upset me with your education level. Go to the "Techno" section of the article "Bulgaria boasted SU-25 ...." comments. There, Putin says about galoshes. Look, and then intercede for sycophants and mediocrity.
    1. Valery Bor
      
      -1
      
      29 March 2021 22: 00
      
      I read the comments and am very glad that I disappointed you. To take out of context - this is your superficial, narrow look, read and hear only what you are interested in, what a bell will click or ring in your head. Nothing else matters. Then I take my leave - I have nothing more to tell you. I will go to communicate with the same sycophants and mediocrities like me.
2. boriz
  
  +2
  
  29 March 2021 22: 21
  
  I just expressed a version about the reason for Biden's sudden breakdown. It is not customary to say such things. It is clear that the grandfather is sick and old, but there must be some serious reasons for such an emotional breakdown. Nobody explained them intelligibly. I expressed a version that is very plausible, explains everything.
  
  And so, you can praise Putin even how much, from this the minimum wage and pension will not be higher. So who did you write this complimentary article for?
  
  Actually, the pensioner of the two of us is me. Praise - did not praise anyone. He presented the real facts. The last of them, the beginning of the development by Rosatom of a new field in Wyoming, practically no one knows, or was ignored.
  And you, with your monotonous groans in the style of "everything is lost", have already tired.
  1. steelmaker
    
    0
    
    29 March 2021 22: 37
    
    in the style of "everything is lost"
    
    And to this style, no one can answer that not everything is lost. And you go there too. I need a specific result, not your shouts of "halva, halva" and objective coverage of the facts. And the concrete result from these deposits is a beggarly salary, pensions, and a rise in prices. And what's the point that Russia owns these deposits, if the people don't even get a crumb! And you, too, are tired, you are glad that there is one more billionaire in Putin's entourage. I will spoil this joy for you all the time!
    1. boriz
      
      +1
      
      29 March 2021 23: 33
      
      I will spoil this joy for you all the time!
      
      You have delusions of grandeur. Nobody pays attention to you.
      1. steelmaker
        
        0
        
        30 March 2021 10: 17
        
        Actually, the pensioner of the two of us is me
        
        It's too early for you to write such global articles. You don't understand people, but you get into politics.
        
        boriz
        
        +2
        
        30 March 2021 21: 58
        
        And this is not a global article. Just an investigation of a small private issue.
        And I have such an experience of working with people that you will never have, by definition.
        
        steelmaker
        
        0
        
        31 March 2021 12: 29
        
        It is immediately obvious that you can only communicate with mediocre people!
        
        And my experience of working with people is like this
        
        That's right, you can't praise yourself, no one will appreciate it. Mediocrity always resort to such a "trick". You want to be exceptional. "What is the pop, so is the arrival."
Vladimir Melnikov

+2

April 12 2021 22: 42

Uranium One has extended its hands to lithium deposits, having bought shares in 2 of them. Lithium batteries will begin to be produced in Russia. On the sly, as taught))