Kedmi called the deadline after which the United States will no longer be able to stop Russia and China

March 20 2021 20

The decision on the position of the American president in relation to Vladimir Putin was not made by the current head of the White House and not now. Joseph Biden is not an independent, but a controlled figure. This opinion was expressed by the Israeli political expert Yakov Kedmi in YouTube-broadcast Soloviev-live.

According to Kedmi, the Americans are now focused on striking Russia in the plane of foreign policy and economics, while the strongest of them may come in the coming years, since the United States does not have much time.

They have 5 to 10 years to break Russia and China. Regarding Russia: 3 more years, and the situation will be irrevocable

- the Israeli analyst is sure.

Kedmi believes that in the next three years, the military forces of the Russian Federation will receive very powerful weapons, and the United States will physically be unable to do anything with Russia. Therefore, Washington is in a hurry. American elites fear that the United States will lose its role as the leading power on the world stage, as this could call into question the existence of the state in the form in which it is now.

Earlier, Yakov Kedmi spoke about the possibility of imposing "eternal sanctions" on Russia, since the collective West will never accept the progressive development of the Russian Federation and is trying to slow down this process.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Cyril

-6

20 March 2021 15: 24

Kedmi believes that in the next three years, the military forces of the Russian Federation will receive very powerful weapons, and the United States will physically be unable to do anything with Russia.

Kedmi has a strange logic. Can the US do something physically with Russia now? This argument looks far-fetched from him.

And since we discard the purely military side, the political and economic side remains. The political positions of the United States, although now somewhat shaken, are still much stronger than the Russian ones. Economic - even more so.

And in principle, it is too early to talk about an alliance between China and Russia. China still recognizes Crimea as Ukrainian, and trades with the United States 6 times more than with Russia.
1. 123
  
  +8
  
  20 March 2021 16: 07
  
  Kedmi has a strange logic. Can the US do something physically with Russia now? This argument looks far-fetched from him.
  
  As long as they can think about it theoretically, then even thinking about it will be ridiculous. This is what we are talking about. No one predicts a military strike, the article says in black and white:
  
  According to Kedmi, the Americans are now focused on striking Russia in the plane of foreign policy and economy.
  
  In the same font and in the same color it is written that:
  
  They have 5 to 10 years to break Russia and China. Regarding Russia: 3 more years, and the situation will be irrevocable
  
  This is not only about Russia but also about China.
  You have once again refuted the thesis that you yourself came up with. Try to re-read the text of the article 2-3 times if all the information is not immediately assimilated.
  
  And since we discard the purely military side, the political and economic side remains. The political positions of the United States, although now, are somewhat shaken. still much stronger than the Russian ones. Economic - even more so.
  
  Such vague formulations were "somewhat shaken" and "much stronger". This only shows your preference. No specific reasons are visible
  
  And in principle, it is too early to talk about an alliance between China and Russia. China still recognizes Crimea as Ukrainian, and trades with the United States 6 times more than with Russia.
  
  Does our official ally Belarus recognize it as Russian? What does the recognition of Crimea have to do with it? For example, not all US allies and not always support the US in military operations. So this argument is far-fetched.
  As for the volume of trade ... Australia's largest trading partner, for example, is China, where it exports 38% of its goods (the USA is in 5th place with a modest 3,81%), in terms of imports, China - 25%, the USA - 11,8% ... Following your logic, Australia is China's ally, or is about to become China, and the United States was just passing by.
  https://trendeconomy.ru/data/h2/Australia/TOTAL
  1. Cyril
    
    -6
    
    20 March 2021 16: 43
    
    As long as they can speculate about it theoretically, further even thinking about it will be funny. This is what we are talking about
    
    Is it because you decided that the Americans would not even be able to think about a military confrontation?
    
    According to Kedmi, the Americans are now focused on striking Russia in the plane of foreign policy and economy.
    
    Then if already now Americans are focused on the plane of foreign policy and economics, to which he said about the weapons that Russia will have in the coming 3 of the year?
    
    His thesis does not fit with the conclusion.
    
    Such vague formulations were "somewhat shaken" and "much stronger". This only shows your preference. No specific reasons are visible
    
    In economic terms, it is enough to look at the main economic indicators of both countries. In political terms, it is enough to look at the situation with the Nord Stream, which cannot be completed in any way due to US pressure on European countries.
    
    This is not only about Russia but also about China.
    You have once again refuted the thesis that you yourself came up with. Try to re-read the text of the article 2-3 times if all the information is not immediately assimilated.
    
    Well, where do I care about you, it's so epic that I don't know how to confuse Moscow with Minsk :)
    
    Regarding this article. I did not invent any thesis. Specially for those who are in an armored train (you have already entered its carriage), in my commentary, I first pointed out the ratio of the capabilities of the United States and separately Russia (which is not yet in favor of Russia), and then indicated that about the hypothetical strategic alliance of Russia and It is too early to speak of China as an aggregate force opposing the United States.
    
    Does our official ally Belarus recognize it as Russian?
    
    Is Belarus a reliable ally?
    
    What does the recognition of Crimea have to do with it?
    
    Given that China has exactly the same problem with Taiwan, which it considers its own. If China viewed Russia as a reliable military and political ally, which can be counted on, among other things, in resolving the Taiwan issue by force, the recognition of Crimea as Russian would be logical.
    
    As for the volume of trade ... Australia's largest trading partner, for example, is China, where it exports 38% of its goods (the USA is in 5th place with a modest 3,81%), in terms of imports, China - 25%, the USA - 11,8% ... Following your logic, Australia is China's ally, or is about to become China, and the United States was just passing by.
    
    Comparing the relative indicators of exports / imports (relative national product) for different countries is your "logic", not mine.
    1. 123
      
      +3
      
      20 March 2021 18: 01
      
      Is it because you decided that the Americans would not even be able to think about a military confrontation?
      
      Why so? Will be able But it will be funny. Have you read it twice, but still do not understand the meaning?
      
      Then, if the Americans are already focused on the plane of foreign policy and economics, why did he say about the weapons that Russia will have in the next 3 years?
      
      In the plane of economics and foreign policy, they are concentrated in relation to Russia, this has not been stated about China. It is not only about Russia, but also about China. Try to re-read the article again. In my opinion, you have difficulties with the perception of information.
      
      In economic terms, it is enough to look at the main economic indicators of both countries. In political terms, it is enough to look at the situation with the Nord Stream, which cannot be completed in any way due to US pressure on European countries.
      
      It may be enough for you, but this is a superficial, I would even say a primitive look. No attempt at analysis. Capitalization is growing by leaps and bounds, so everything is fine?
      The situation with SP-2 is just not an indicator. You yourself wrote - because of the US pressure on European countries. European "allies" wriggle under the master's boot, while Russia calmly lays down the pipe. By the way, this is another example of the "unity" of the allies In my opinion, they have a slightly different view of the situation, don't you think?
      
      Well, where do I care about you, it's so epic that I don't know how to confuse Moscow with Minsk :)
      
      Don't worry, learn If you work on yourself, you will forget the smell of a damp rag, and your miscalculations will be limited as insignificant as this error with the wrong link inserted. The main thing is not to be lazy.
      
      Regarding this article. I did not invent any thesis. Specially for those who are in an armored train (you have already entered its carriage), in my commentary, I first pointed out the ratio of the capabilities of the United States and separately Russia (which is not yet in favor of Russia), and then indicated that about the hypothetical strategic alliance of Russia and It is too early to speak of China as an aggregate force opposing the United States.
      
      A villager accustomed to a cart should not talk about an armored train. It won't help you look smarter than you really are.
      1) Let me remind you of your words:
      
      Kedmi has a strange logic. Can the US do something physically with Russia now? This argument looks far-fetched from him.
      And since we discard the purely military side, the political and economic side remains. The political positions of the United States, although now, are somewhat shaken. still much stronger than the Russian ones. Economic - even more so.
      
      You did not understand that we are talking about China, from this you concluded that Kedmi's statement is far-fetched.
      2) Did you compare the positions of Russia in politics and economics, concluded that the United States has them much stronger and therefore an alliance between Russia and China is currently impossible? I understand correctly?
      This is epic nonsense. Russia is stronger than China in terms of military power, China is stronger in economy. Joining efforts perfectly complement the capabilities of countries in confronting the United States. But for some reason you think it is impossible. In your opinion, Russia should first catch up with China in terms of economics, but Ride us in armaments? What is this statement based on?
      
      Is Belarus a reliable ally?
      
      Who cares? Allies are different. But you are sure that cooperation is not possible without an answer to a very popular question in Ukraine - whose is Crimea?
      
      Given that China has exactly the same problem with Taiwan, which it considers its own. If China viewed Russia as a reliable military and political ally, which can be counted on, among other things, in resolving the Taiwan issue by force, the recognition of Crimea as Russian would be logical.
      
      This is logical with your primitive reasoning. As far as I remember, the Chinese were not noticed in excessive altruism. Why would they just recognize Crimea without getting anything in return? they are now preparing to join Taiwan. From the latest news, the Chinese announced the construction of a tunnel to the island, a helipad is being built on the shore of the strait, Russian-made helicopters are already based there, and special forces use them. For the West, the annexation of Taiwan is a much more serious event than Crimea. This at least means that the production of microelectronics will be under the control of China. Serious money has been invested in Taiwan. There were no English, American and other banks and companies in Crimea. The reaction and opposition will be serious. Up to attempts to establish a naval blockade, in these conditions it is quite logical for China to enlist the support of Russia. In these conditions, it is extremely necessary. Recognition of Crimea as Russian, if this is important to you, will most likely be linked to support for Taiwan and probably not only.
      
      Comparing the relative indicators of exports / imports (relative national product) for different countries is your "logic", not mine.
      
      True? So these are not your words?
      
      А in principle, it is too early to talk about an alliance between China and Russia... Crimea China still recognizes Ukrainian, and trades with the USA 6 times more than with Russia.
      
      Catch me in a lie, and write that you didn't say that
      1. Cyril
        
        -3
        
        20 March 2021 19: 12
        
        But it will be funny.
        
        Who? You? Well, laughter for no reason is a sign of you know what.
        
        Have you read it twice, but still do not understand the meaning?
        
        Yes, you can't figure out your bouncing thoughts without half a pint.
        
        In terms of economics and foreign policy, they are focused on Russia; this has not been stated about China.
        
        Why? The quote from Kedmi in the article speaks of both Russia and China.
        
        It may be enough for you, but this is a superficial, I would even say a primitive look. No attempt at analysis. Capitalization is growing by leaps and bounds, so everything is fine?
        
        In your country, the economic power of the state is measured only by capitalization? O_o Yes, the economist of you is so-so ... Does such an indicator as GDP (absolute or relative) mean anything?
        
        However, capitalization is a completely objective indicator, although not exhaustive. It also reflects investor confidence in a commercial organization or country. And investors, as a rule, do not choose unreliable economies for their deposits.
        
        The situation with SP-2 is just not an indicator. You yourself wrote - because of the US pressure on European countries. European "allies" wriggle under the master's boot, while Russia calmly lays the pipe.
        
        Oh, it can lay a pipe at least along the entire equator - no one argues with that :) But how much gas will flow through it (if at all) and with what benefit for Russia is a big question. Or do you have pipe laying - is it such an intrinsic value?
        
        By the way, this is another example of the "unity" of the allies laughing In my opinion, they have a slightly different view of the situation, don't you think?
        
        And whatever their view, the constant suspension of construction by the European participants in the project suggests that the United States influences them much more than Russia.
        
        Don't worry, learn
        
        God forbid, I don't need such good. I will consider Moscow as Moscow in the old fashioned way, and Minsk as Minsk.
        
        If you work on yourself, you will forget the smell of a damp cloth.
        
        I have never known this smell, age-related incontinence is your problem. I'm fine with that.
        
        A villager accustomed to a cart should not talk about an armored train.
        
        So do not argue)
        
        You compared the positions of Russia in politics and economics, concluded that the United States has them much stronger and therefore an alliance between Russia and China is currently impossible? I understand correctly?
        
        No, I have not deduced such a causal relationship anywhere. An alliance between China and Russia against the United States does not currently exist due to the closer economic ties between the United States and China.
        
        Russia is stronger than China in terms of military power, China is stronger in economy. The joining of efforts perfectly complements the capabilities of countries in confronting the United States. But for some reason you think this impossible.
        
        I did not say "impossible", I said that this union does not exist now.
        
        Who cares? Allies are different.
        
        That's right, they are different. So is Belarus a reliable ally?
        
        But you are sure that cooperation is not possible without an answer to a very popular question in Ukraine - whose is Crimea?
        
        Of course available. The question is to what extent. If there is a military clash between NATO and Russia, will Belarus fight on the side of Russia?
        
        From the latest news, the Chinese announced the construction of a tunnel to the island, a helipad is being built on the shore of the strait, Russian-made helicopters are already based there, and special forces use them.
        
        Does the presence of Russian-made helicopters make Russia's support for the military annexation of Taiwan 100%? I remember that in the 60s, China already sent Soviet-made weapons to the USSR.
        
        In these conditions, it is quite logical for China to enlist the support of Russia. In these conditions, it is extremely necessary. Recognition of Crimea as Russian, if this is important to you, will most likely be linked to support for Taiwan and probably not only.
        
        Bingo. But something is in no hurry to recognize Crimea as Russian amid preparations for the annexation of Taiwan.
        
        True? So these are not your words?
        
        and write that you didn't say that
        
        In no way do I deny my words. And I will decipher them, if you do not understand:
        
        Trade between the United States and China - $ 580 billion.
        
        The trade turnover between China and Russia is over 100 billion dollars.
        
        The difference is almost 6 times. And I was comparing the absolute figure, not the share of exports / imports to / from China in the total exports / imports of any country. Because in your case, the comparison will be biased due to the peculiarities of the structure of national exports / imports.
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        20 March 2021 20: 25
        
        Who? You? Well, laughter for no reason is a sign of you know what.
        
        Well, if this is not funny for you, then the problem is exclusively yours. You can be sad about the inability of the United States to do anything in Russia by military means.
        
        Yes, you can't figure out your bouncing thoughts without half a pint.
        
        You don't understand the article the first time. Maybe it's you? Try it without a pint. Tie a thump, maybe the clarity of thought will return.
        
        Why? The quote from Kedmi in the article speaks of both Russia and China.
        
        It is about them that it says, but it does not say about the impossibility of using military measures against China. Re-read the article again soberly.
        
        In your country, the economic power of the state is measured only by capitalization? O_o Yes, the economist of you is so-so ... Does such an indicator as GDP (absolute or relative) mean anything?
        However, capitalization is a completely objective indicator, although not exhaustive. It also reflects investor confidence in a commercial organization or country. And investors, as a rule, do not choose unreliable economies for their deposits.
        
        Is it about economic power? As far as I remember, it was said about "somewhat shaken economic positions." What does the size of GDP have to do with it? The economic situation in the United States is far from simple. The financial "bubble" is obvious, as a rule, this leads to serious crises, which, as practice shows, Russia has learned to endure with much less losses than the United States (our economy sagged less during the coronavirus). Moreover, the crisis will be there, and only its consequences will affect us.
        What kind of investor confidence do you fill in? The Fed is throwing trillions of dollars into circulation. They are sterilized at the exchange. Investor confidence doesn't generate that much money. let them believe as much as they want, but they don't get any more money from this.
        
        Oh, it can lay a pipe at least along the entire equator - no one argues with that :) But how much gas will flow through it (if at all) and with what benefit for Russia is a big question. Or do you have pipe laying - is it such an intrinsic value?
        
        Exactly. Russia can lay the pipe regardless of the opinion of the Americans on this issue. We'll find out a little later about the volume of pumping. The problem here is Germany's sovereignty. In any case, I see no point in discussing your predictions today. We'll talk about this later.
        
        And whatever their view, the constant suspension of construction by the European participants in the project suggests that the United States influences them much more than Russia.
        
        The US opinion on the pipeline has not changed, however, construction is resumed each time and is ongoing. Your conclusion is not correct. How sad it is for you, but the pipe will be completed, and you will tear your hair out of annoyance.
        
        No, I have not deduced such a causal relationship anywhere. An alliance between China and Russia against the United States does not currently exist due to the closer economic ties between the United States and China.
        
        What nonsense. Closer ties have nothing to do with it. I gave you the example of Australia. Contradictions and diverging interests between the United States and China are growing.
        
        I did not say "impossible", I said that this union does not exist now.
        
        More precisely, you said about such an alliance "in principle, it is too early to speak." In my opinion, it's time to create it.
        
        That's right, they are different. So is Belarus a reliable ally?
        
        Who cares? What does this have to do with China?
        
        Of course available. The question is to what extent. If there is a military clash between NATO and Russia, will Belarus fight on the side of Russia?
        
        What does Belarus have to do with it?
        
        Does the presence of Russian-made helicopters make Russia's support for the military annexation of Taiwan 100%? I remember that in the 60s, China already sent Soviet-made weapons to the USSR.
        
        Did I say that this is the only sign? By the way, did you ignore the presence of the heliport on the shore of the strait?
        
        Bingo. But something is in no hurry to recognize Crimea as Russian amid preparations for the annexation of Taiwan.
        
        Why should he be in a hurry?
        
        In no way do I deny my words. And I will decipher them, if you do not understand:
        Trade between the United States and China - $ 580 billion.
        The trade turnover between China and Russia is over 100 billion dollars.
        The difference is almost 6 times. And I was comparing the absolute figure, not the share of exports / imports to / from China in the total exports / imports of any country. Because in your case, the comparison will be biased due to the peculiarities of the structure of national exports / imports.
        
        You can compare the trade turnover of Australia with China and the United States in absolute terms, I left you the link above to the source of information. What does it change? The proportions will be about the same. But Australia is an ally of the United States and not China, despite the fact that China is the main trading partner. Your conclusion is not correct.
Binder

-4

20 March 2021 17: 12

I never cease to wonder - how did such a completely gray, ordinary Israeli official-retired Yasha Kedmi become a respected expert in Russia on all issues without exception? Yes, we have such political scientists in Israel who love to talk about any topic a dime a dozen. Yasha, unlike those who speak out for free, found a successful use of his inclinations - he receives, as they say, not sickly fees from "nightingale droppings" and other Russian talk shows, such a weld to a general's pension, which is also not taxed. Only dear gentlemen Russians, I dare to remind you of the old truth - whoever eats a girl, dances her, in other words - Yasha honestly tells the Russians what they want to hear for Russian fees, and conscientiously fulfills every cent. Therefore, you shouldn't really believe his words, because if a girl working in the first ancient profession tells a generous client that he is an amazing lover, then this is not always true ...
1. Petr Vladimirovich
  
  +2
  
  20 March 2021 18: 09
  
  Shalom Shabbat! How are you? Have you finished building a plasterboard house in the Golan?
  1. Binder
    
    0
    
    20 March 2021 18: 48
    
    And you don't have to be ill. My house is not at all in the Golan, but on the northern slope of the Carmel mountain range above the Haifa Bay. And it is not made of drywall, the outer walls are made of monolithic reinforced concrete, the inner walls are Ytong blocks. The work, for the most part, has been completed, there are little things left, now we are starting the arrangement of the yard, the spouse is planting all sorts of flowers.
    1. Petr Vladimirovich
      
      +2
      
      20 March 2021 19: 21
      
      So that's great! Why didn't I hit Wotsap, it’s more interesting to exchange life ...
      1. Binder
        
        +1
        
        20 March 2021 21: 58
        
        Yes somehow all the time is not present, vanity. I undertake to contact as soon as I rake my business.
2. AND
  
  +1
  
  22 March 2021 21: 19
  
  Israeli retired official Yasha Kedmi has become a respected expert in Russia. I ask you to clarify hto? I see you are smarter than Kedmi. Write stories, we will read, we will appreciate.
  1. Binder
    
    0
    
    22 March 2021 21: 54
    
    Thank you for the positive assessment of my mental abilities, although I am not Izya. However, unlike Kedmi, I am not yet retired and therefore do not have enough time to write stories. I'll retire with God's help in a couple of years, then I'll write - I have a story to tell.
isofat

-1

20 March 2021 20: 02

Kedmi presents the current situation in such a way that it becomes clear that the United States and Russia have no other ways, they need to hurry up in the fight with each other, otherwise some of them will feel bad. Here's a recent case, who provoked it? This provocateur is Kedmi.
Vladest

0

20 March 2021 20: 46

Russia and China. According to the rules of enumeration, "K" is ahead of "P", and in terms of the scale of influence on the Globe, comparing China and Russia, the second can be safely set aside for later. So it is written in the doctrine of US foreign policy. China is their main threat, while Russia is just a problem.
You ought to get tired of sculpting yourself to China. For China, you are no more a bipod than for America. For a long time already it would be necessary to "Stretch the legs over the clothes" and really take care of yourself and the standard of living of the people.
The world is not a sports race. China, purely demographically, should be ahead of the United States, as well as India in some. the future. But the United States, as a strong state, will remain so.
And what about the Russian Federation. More recently, 2,2% of world GDP. Now it is already 1,78%. Not far away that time already and less than a percent.
1. kapitan92
  
  +1
  
  20 March 2021 21: 02
  
  Quote: Vladest
  According to the transfer rules, "K" goes ahead of "P",
  
  Alphabetically!
  
  Quote: Vladest
  You ought to get tired of sculpting yourself to China.
  
  This is dashing!
  These "Baltic sisters" have stuck themselves to the EU, while Russia and China have very interesting economic projects.
  
  Trade turnover between Russia and China in the 1st quarter ingrew by 3,4% compared to the same period in 2019 and reached $ 25,4 billion ... Chinese exports to Russia in three months fell by 14,6% on an annualized basis and amounted to $ 9,1 billion, while supplies from Russia to China increased by 17,3% to $ 16,2 billion.
  
  Why has Russia offended you so much? Or small but "proud" Estonia?
  Really "small bug, but smelly"! (pog)
  1. Vladest
    
    -2
    
    21 March 2021 10: 56
    
    Quote: kapitan92
    These "Baltic sisters" have stuck themselves to the EU, while Russia and China have very interesting economic projects.
    
    Words not related to the topic are flooding.
    By switching to a flood, you prove that you cannot answer anything on the topic. Why go where you are not competent?
    Or still on the topic. Why are you sticking to China? Compare all your rotten numbers with what China and the United States have. For China, the main partner is the United States.
    1. kapitan92
      
      +2
      
      21 March 2021 15: 21
      
      I repeat, my question is for the very clever.
      
      Why has Russia offended you so much? Or small but "proud" Estonia?
      
      Russian, as you position yourself here, knows perfectly well what an ALPHABET is, and not
      
      According to the transfer rules, "K" goes ahead of "P",
      
      Your quote!
      Stop writing nonsense! Lift your ass off the bench on your farm and go clean the snow, it will be more useful.
Lime Bayun_2

+2

22 March 2021 13: 30

How many wolves do not feed ....
Gerix

0

4 May 2021 09: 54

For good money, I would also carry nonsense like a nightingale with kedmi