Baku was able to destroy the newest Russian electronic warfare "Repellent" in Karabakh

February 2 2021 45

The soldiers of the last war in Nagorno-Karabakh continue to return home, and the places of hostilities are gradually being cleared of the destroyed and damaged equipment... Many details about what happened in those places in the fall of 2020 are becoming public.

On February 2, 2021, a video from the Azerbaijani side appeared on the Web, showing a burnt installation of a clearly military purpose. Visually, it is very similar to the Russian-made advanced electronic warfare "Repellent". It could have been destroyed with a drone by an air strike or covered with artillery fire. From this video, it is more difficult to determine more precisely how it was destroyed.

The installation has a license plate indicating the Armenian origin of this technique. Therefore, there is a high probability that Baku was really able to destroy the newest Russian electronic warfare "Repellent", which Yerevan received from Moscow. It should be noted that as early as October 1, 2020, the Azerbaijani military and the media reported on the destruction of the Repellent electronic warfare, but then they did not provide convincing evidence.

Note that the aforementioned electronic warfare complex is designed to solve the problems of electronic intelligence and electronic suppression of radio equipment of small unmanned aerial vehicles and their ground control points. "Repellent" is a development of the "Scientific and Technical Center of Electronic Warfare" (JSC "Scientific and Technical Center Electronic Warfare", Moscow).

JSC "STC Electronic Warfare"

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Michael1950

-4

2 February 2021 21: 45

- And why not? "Bayraktar" drops bombs from an electro-optical seeker - it does not care about "Repellent". And the control channel of the UAV, apparently, is sufficiently protected with the appropriate cipher so that the "Repellent" does not break it ...
1. boriz
  
  +2
  
  2 February 2021 22: 52
  
  - she doesn't care about "Repellent".
  
  Are there any specifics or do you just want to?
  And RepeLLant, actually.
2. Monster_Fat
  
  -15
  
  2 February 2021 23: 15
  
  There is more and more evidence that the "all-conquering electronic warfare" is in fact the same "propaganda bubble" like all the other Kremlin "cartoons" and "prodigies" ... Hello to the sect of the "mighty" Khibiny "and the fearful" Cook "".
  1. gorenina91
    
    -4
    
    3 February 2021 08: 18
    
    I guessed and I understood life’s deception,
    I do not complain about my unenviable share.
    The soul does not suffer from longing and wounds,
    No one will help either suffering or grief ...
    -S.A. Yesenin
    
    There is more and more evidence that the "all-conquering electronic warfare" is, in fact, the same "propaganda bubble" like all the other Kremlin "cartoons" and "wunderwales" ... Hello to the sect of the "mighty" Khibiny "and the fearful" Cook ""
    
    - Alas, but it's hard to disagree with you ...
    - Yes, a solid "soap bubble" ... - iridescent with all the colors of the rainbow ...
    - And it is also good that Russia did not take a direct part in this Karabakh war ... - Otherwise it would be a shame "In all Ivanovskaya" ...
    - Personally, I don't think that ours could show anything there, except ... heroism ... - One thing is that the Turks then very simply shot down our combat helicopter, moreover, on the Armenian territory ... is already a fact speaks for itself ... - But what ... then ................... - okay, I won't say ... - It's in Syria ... - they have been bombing and bombing the Syrian desert for more than five years ... - go and check ... how many "hundreds of thousands" have already "eliminated the ringleaders of the bandits and the bandits themselves" ... - But when it comes to the obvious; then you can't get out ... - here just the old song begins ... - "about the treachery of the enemy; about the fact that the crew was not in place, went out to smoke,; about the fact that the complex was not put on alert; that the complex was not put on alert; the people who have been supplied with all this Russian armament are unable to master this "advanced technology" ... ". - and so on and so on ... - I'm tired of just reading this ...
    - But the Turks on the F-16 (assembled on the territory of Turkey) easily shoot down our military aircraft; they easily shoot down Syrian planes; they easily shoot down our military helicopter ... - And the Azerbaijanis suddenly very quickly master the Turkish "Bayraktars" and the entire complex system of firing and striking, and smash the positions of the Karabakh army into the trash ..; which are also armed not with outdated rifles, but with quite "modern Russian weapons" ...
    - Personally, I do not make here ... here ... there is a big difference between the Karabakh and Russian soldiers ...
    - Of course, if our soldiers were in the place of the Karabakh ... then Karabakh would have remained in the same status; but our losses would be simply enormous ...
    - You can continue to build illusions (and "frighten Cook", who in the Black Sea feels ... - like at home) ... - but what could this lead to ...
    - My plus ...
  2. RFR
    
    +1
    
    3 February 2021 18: 16
    
    you also need to know how to manage technology, but in the hands of savages it is no more dangerous than a stick ...
3. Object.F7
  
  +4
  
  3 February 2021 13: 34
  
  In Karabakh, several bayraktars were landed with evidence on video without visible physical damage, probably with the help of electronic warfare. But how this EW installation was destroyed is still a big question. They could have covered it with art on a tip from ground reconnaissance, for example. If the bayraktar had destroyed it, you would have been confirming with the UAV video, as in other cases with armored vehicles.
Michael1950

-1

2 February 2021 23: 41

Quote: boriz
- she doesn't care about "Repellent".

Are there any specifics or do you just want to?
And RepeLLant, actually.

- Yes, at least three LLLs, - the radio engineering system cannot suppress the electronic-optical system.
1. Object.F7
  
  +2
  
  3 February 2021 13: 47
  
  So where is the confirmation video from the UAV? The optics there are good, but since there is no such video, it means that the UAV is not in business in this case
Ser sash

+4

3 February 2021 00: 49

Azerbaijan itself confirmed that the Armenians suffered the main losses from the attacks of conventional artillery.
Even if you suppress all the radio channels of the PBLA, you can cover the area using the coordinates from the satellite.
1. Michael1950
  
  -1
  
  10 February 2021 11: 13
  
  Azerbaijan itself confirmed that the Armenians suffered the main losses from the attacks of conventional artillery.
  
  - No matter how it is: the Azerbaijanis were able to win the war, first of all, thanks to the Turkish strike UAVs - and now all the armies of the world (including the Russian one) are "scratching their heads" and thinking how to modernize their armies in the same way ?!
  1. Ser sash
    
    0
    
    11 February 2021 14: 07
    
    And why are the losses of the parties equal, with a clear advantage of one of the parties?
Binder

-10

3 February 2021 03: 38

For the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the war in Karabakh is 2020. - a specific headache. She was a vivid example of how an armed conflict can proceed in which a well-organized army equipped with modern weapons will fight against the Russians. The conclusions are obvious, but in today's Russia there are no scientific, industrial and financial resources in order to quickly create and put on stream the production of weapons capable of equally opposing a technically equipped enemy, and the strategic thinking of the Russian generals remained at the level of the middle of the last century.
1. sgrabik
  
  +4
  
  3 February 2021 13: 37
  
  However, you are a stupid person if you seriously draw such conclusions and try to equalize the capabilities of the Armenian army, or even more so the militia of Karabakh, with the capabilities of the regular army of Russia.
  1. Binder
    
    -4
    
    3 February 2021 15: 08
    
    Stupid is the one who does not understand the obvious truths and tries to look at the world through rose-colored glasses.
    1. sgrabik
      
      +5
      
      3 February 2021 15: 13
      
      Yes, the fact of the matter is that your perception of everything that happens in reality takes place through the prism of your personal beliefs and desires, which have nothing to do with the actual state of affairs !!!
      1. Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        -4
        
        3 February 2021 16: 24
        
        In this statement, Bindyuzhnik is right, and one should not wish not to see the obvious. But every misfortune has its own advantages. For the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Karabakh showed the weakest but very important point, which needs to be hastily corrected. Even the most brainless in the government and the RF Ministry of Defense have combed their turnips that they need to hastily make up ...
      2. Binder
        
        -5
        
        3 February 2021 19: 47
        
        The actual state of affairs is as follows: the Russian army in many types of conventional weapons is seriously lagging behind the Americans, Israelis and a number of other advanced states in the field of technology. This is an objective reality, it will not be possible to eliminate such a lag for a number of reasons, therefore Russian propagandists tell ordinary citizens about the miracle weapon, trying to create an illusion of power and invincibility among the people. Believe their tales if you feel calmer.
2. ksa
  
  +1
  
  4 February 2021 17: 27
  
  It is only strange that a well-organized and equipped with modern types of weapons, the Turkish army for so many years has nothing to do with the Kurdish militia.
  1. Alexander Sergeev_3
    
    0
    
    9 February 2021 23: 30
    
    that in some areas the Turks cannot enter ... the Kurds run with the Kalash
Cheburashk

+7

3 February 2021 04: 10

Regarding the destruction of this installation, I can say one thing: no matter how advanced the technology is, but if the one who controls it grows out of ... hands, then, as they say, it will not work as it should.
And for sure no one can really say for sure what kind of installation it is, but the main thing is that it burned out and does not represent any value.
Cheburashk

+4

3 February 2021 04: 11

Quote: Monster_Fat
There is more and more evidence that the "all-conquering electronic warfare" is in fact the same "propaganda bubble" like all the other Kremlin "cartoons" and "prodigies" ... Hello to the sect of the "mighty" Khibiny "and the fearful" Cook "".

Stop crowing, it's not morning!
Cheburashk

+9

3 February 2021 04: 18

Quote: Bindyuzhnik
For the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the war in Karabakh is 2020. - a specific headache. She was a vivid example of how an armed conflict can proceed in which a well-organized army equipped with modern weapons will fight against the Russians. The conclusions are obvious, but in today's Russia there are no scientific, industrial and financial resources in order to quickly create and put on stream the production of weapons capable of equally opposing a technically equipped enemy, and the strategic thinking of the Russian generals remained at the level of the middle of the last century.

Do you even feel the difference between fight и sell or provide technique ???? Do you speak so flatteringly about the power of Turkey or Azerbaijan? And on what basis do you make such statements? Is it because of the UAV? Russian troops did not fight in NK, and the Turkish army opposed NK (at least mercenaries and special forces + the Azerbaijani army. In addition to everything, Armenia is in power (censorship) + there was a betrayal of the Armenian authorities of NK.
So you tell your conclusion to the homeless people!
amateur

+6

3 February 2021 05: 55

Quote: Bindyuzhnik
For the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the war in Karabakh is 2020. - a specific headache. She was a clear example of how an armed conflict can proceed in which against the Russians will fight well

And where did our "Jewish partner" find Russians in Karabakh? Not otherwise, after eating lard with Svidomo.
Machine_Learning

-6

3 February 2021 08: 07

At first, the "repellent" disarmed the "bayraktars," Erdogan angrily spoke about this, saying that the Armenians are being sold the latest weapons systems.
Then our electronic warfare systems "planted" from 5-8 UAVs "bayraktar".

But then the Turks caught on and outwitted.
They calculated the time when the "repellent" turns on - this is the time when there are no UAVs of the Armenians themselves in the air. And when they saw the UAV of the Armenians, the Turks realized that the "repellent" would not work for this.
Then the Azerbaijanis specially put forward BMP tanks - the targets of bait, so that the Armenian UAVs would fly for a long time.
And at this time "bayraktars" came close and destroyed all targets that were visible and not even visible (through a thermal imager).

Those. here dexterity and a quick reasonable decision helped the Azerbaijanis and Turks.
These are the tactics that should be taught in the newest command schools of the RF Ministry of Defense.
Not by force to take, but by tactics and skill. And for this, it is necessary to cultivate initiative in certain moments of the battle, and not wait for reinforcements or an official command.
The current Russian school of officers is very weak. There are no initiative generals like Field Marshal Suvorov or Marshal Zhukov. Although they were punished for the initiative, after their victories.

That's all I wanted to say.
1. sgrabik
  
  +2
  
  3 February 2021 14: 16
  
  Our army will learn lessons from this conflict, and if this circumstance is in fact the reason for the destruction of the electronic warfare system "Repellent", then all the necessary conclusions will be drawn and all the necessary changes made !!!
2. The comment was deleted.
Petr Vladimirovich

+1

3 February 2021 18: 21

Hello colleagues! You will laugh, 74-75 after the 4th year I work as a French translator at the EAAC school in Algeria, Batna. He was never a military man, but he helped the guys count-shoot (from M-30 howitzers), and for some he even "shot" himself.
They surrendered everything and even once at the target, the T-34s hit, burned beautifully ...
trahterist

0

4 February 2021 04: 26

This is called briefly and capaciously - give the fool a glass dick - he will break the dick and break his arms.
Here's something against the RUSSIAN troops no bayraktars and other high-tech stuff Doesn't work.
Syria is a prime example.
1. Uneven
  
  -2
  
  4 February 2021 11: 25
  
  Please, give an example of the use of some "high-tech stuff" against the RF Armed Forces in Syria.
  The defeat of the Russian group at Hasham by the Americans on April 30, 2018 can be ignored.
trahterist

-1

4 February 2021 04: 27

Quote: Machine_Learning
At first, the "repellent" disarmed the "bayraktars," Erdogan angrily spoke about this, saying that the Armenians are being sold the latest weapons systems.
Then our electronic warfare systems "planted" from 5-8 UAVs "bayraktar".

But then the Turks caught on and outwitted.
They calculated the time when the "repellent" turns on - this is the time when there are no UAVs of the Armenians themselves in the air. And when they saw the UAV of the Armenians, the Turks realized that the "repellent" would not work for this.
Then the Azerbaijanis specially put forward BMP tanks - the targets of bait, so that the Armenian UAVs would fly for a long time.
And at this time "bayraktars" came close and destroyed all targets that were visible and not even visible (through a thermal imager).

Those. here dexterity and a quick reasonable decision helped the Azerbaijanis and Turks.
These are the tactics that should be taught in the newest command schools of the RF Ministry of Defense.
Not by force to take, but by tactics and skill. And for this, it is necessary to cultivate initiative in certain moments of the battle, and not wait for reinforcements or an official command.
The current Russian school of officers is very weak. There are no initiative generals like Field Marshal Suvorov or Marshal Zhukov. Although they were punished for the initiative, after their victories.

That's all I wanted to say.

Do your homework, storyteller.
And to school in the morning.
1. Pound
  
  -1
  
  4 February 2021 09: 37
  
  He's not a storyteller, just a contraceptive.
The comment was deleted.
Mike fly

0

7 February 2021 04: 19

After the defeat of the Armenians in the province of Azerbaijan, Karabakh, which was supported by Russia, the Russian press constantly published articles in which they explain the uselessness of Russian weapons either by illiterate Armenian operators, or by the failed tactics of terrorists.
it also describes the mythical dignity as it turned out Russian trash which in "the hands of a Russian soldier works miracles."
only now it is not possible to show the "field of miracles".
that in Syria, that in Libya, that in Azerbaijan all this Russian trash-air defense was smashed to pieces.
I think that the eloquent footage of the Victory Parade in Baku where all this destroyed rubbish was carried out across the square is the best proof of the worthlessness of the so-called. "Russian miracle weapon".
Alexander K_2

-1

7 February 2021 08: 03

Any technique, even the most, can be destroyed! It is necessary to understand under what conditions it was destroyed!
Michael1950

-1

10 February 2021 11: 15

Quote: boriz
- she doesn't care about "Repellent".

Are there any specifics or do you just want to?
And RepeLLant, actually.
1. Ser sash
  
  0
  
  11 February 2021 14: 15
  
  Half - work of artillery on guidance from UAVs.
  1. Michael1950
    
    -1
    
    11 February 2021 17: 14
    
    - Complete nonsense. Look from beginning to end and count.
    1. Ser sash
      
      0
      
      12 February 2021 07: 53
      
      Can you tell the difference between Bayraktar's ATGM strike and an artillery shell?
      What are the signs?
Michael1950

-1

11 February 2021 17: 15

Quote: Ser Sash
And why are the losses of the parties equal, with a clear advantage of one of the parties?

- Who told you this ?! Armenian radio ??
1. Ser sash
  
  +1
  
  12 February 2021 07: 54
  
  Azerbaijani
Michael1950

-1

12 February 2021 18: 06

Quote: Ser Sash
Azerbaijani

- Not true. The losses of the parties are by no means equal.
Michael1950

-1

12 February 2021 18: 09

Quote: Ser Sash
Can you tell the difference between Bayraktar's ATGM strike and an artillery shell?
What are the signs?

- And there, a couple of marks are pounced on the target from the UAV. And only then - "bang"!
What does an artillery shell have to do with it ?! Since when did he start hovering from the UAV ??
1. Ser sash
  
  +2
  
  12 February 2021 22: 33
  
  On the u-tube there is a selection of the work "Krasnopol" in Syria.
  He needs illumination and illuminated targets from the UAV.
  When a rocket starts from a helicopter, it shakes noticeably, and then everything is smooth.
  And the Turks themselves said that the UAVs illuminated targets for the MLRS guided by the beam.
  And at Bayraktar, an ATGM rocket is used as an ammunition, it also needs to be highlighted.
  
  If something appears there sometimes inscriptions in Russian in the scope, but more often the inscription is not visible, it is cut off at the top, in the first original videos they were visible.
Michael1950

-1

13 February 2021 02: 31

Quote: Ser Sash
On the u-tube there is a selection of the work "Krasnopol" in Syria.
He needs illumination and illuminated targets from the UAV.
When a rocket starts from a helicopter, it shakes noticeably, and then everything is smooth.
And the Turks themselves said that the UAVs illuminated targets for the MLRS guided by the beam.
And at Bayraktar, an ATGM rocket is used as an ammunition, it also needs to be highlighted.

If something appears there sometimes inscriptions in Russian in the scope, but more often the inscription is not visible, it is cut off at the top, in the first original videos they were visible.

- Did the Azerbaijanis quite often use Krasnopol in Karabakh ?! Where does the equality of defeats by artillery and UAVs come from ?!
1. Ser sash
  
  -1
  
  13 February 2021 08: 57
  
  Difficult with you.
  Azerbaijan, according to the Turks, used Turkish MLRS, with missiles guided by illumination, or coordinates transmitted by UAVs. In the video above, the UAVs are not drums, but the picture is the same as yours.
  In Karabakh, the distances are what, there it is possible to cover half of the terrain with barrel artillery.
  1. Michael1950
    
    -1
    
    14 February 2021 00: 32
    
    - Here they say that the losses in manpower are equal (which I can't believe - I don't believe the losses declared by the Armenian side):
    https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-55149056
    But losses in technology are completely asymmetrical..
Michael1950

-1

17 February 2021 05: 49

Quote: trahterist
This is called briefly and capaciously - give the fool a glass dick - he will break the dick and break his arms.
Here's something against the RUSSIAN troops no bayraktars and other high-tech trash Does not work.
Syria is a prime example.

- In fact, against the VKS, there is NEVER a high-tech "trash" in Syria, or somewhere else - not used ...