The Americans made fun of the new footage of the Su-24 overflight over "Donald Cook"

February 1 2021 84

The US Sixth Fleet showed new footage of a Russian Su-24 front-line bomber flying at low altitude over the US destroyer USS Donald Cook, which entered the Black Sea a week ago.

The United States naval forces regularly enter the Black Sea region to take actions aimed at securing NATO interests. At the same time, the NATO ships are not ignored by the Russians.

American Twitter users ridiculed footage of a Russian plane flying over Donald Cook, here are some of their comments:

I want our military around the world to behave more aggressively in response to Russian or Chinese provocations. We have nothing to fear from these countries - they are bullies who take what they can get but run like cowards when confronted

- Jeff_M_Mastro thinks so.

Do you know how many aircraft carriers Russia has? One, and it's an old piece of junk. There are 11 of them in the USA, 80 aircraft each. We will not even talk about destroyers (67) and submarines (65) ... We dominate both the seas and the air

- the user h8cloz is proud.

It's okay - they just signaled to Trump that they were ready to pick him up at any moment and deliver him to the new Moscow penthouse.

- WillKowalski jokes.

They're checking Biden - is he sleeping? Donald would kick the ass of the Russians in return

- thinks so shelbyo94206097.

Ivan, think no more about the American Navy, but about the protests on the streets of your cities

- advises MlKEMlKEMlKE.

How sweet they want to scare us

- “touched” by ryanimal34.

Was the pilot just having fun? Could a 70s plane pose a real threat in modern combat? It was at least modernized, or the Russians are still in vogue with Soviet Technology?

- asks cv6_e.

Maybe he forgot his Garmin and got lost?

- asks Energy Field, posting a snapshot showing the use of a third-party navigator in a Russian combat aircraft.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Dmitry S.

+7

1 February 2021 12: 04

Guys-mattress toppers confuse aggression and protective "otvetki". And this is very strange for a country with a large GDP, which is constantly threatened by GDP.
mark1

+6

1 February 2021 13: 13

We also have an aircraft carrier on the Black Sea - Crimea. And the Americans have something similar on the Black Sea, or at least

old piece of junk?

You were afraid, you are afraid and you will be afraid!
1. Yura Zhavoronkov
  
  0
  
  4 February 2021 15: 54
  
  You can be envied! Everyone is afraid of him, and that makes you happy. Do not burst from its overabundance, racial happiness!
sgrabik

+3

1 February 2021 14: 41

If such a need arises, we may well be able to find something much more modern, convincing and effective than the Su-24, in order to completely discourage anyone who will threaten us, dictate their terms to us and talk to us from a position of strength, good the one who laughs last laughs !!!
Volga073

+5

1 February 2021 15: 16

From the Anthem of the USA and Alaska to "Shell" last week - so far only the Americans steal everything from us)))
Volga073

+2

1 February 2021 15: 18

Just one Poseidon - and America will disappear!
Kedrovich

+5

1 February 2021 18: 20

The first commentator got it wrong. This usa behaves like a gopnik and is washed off if it gets in the nose.
1. Vladest
  
  -5
  
  1 February 2021 23: 20
  
  Quote: Kedrovich
  The first commentator got it wrong. This usa behaves like a gopnik and is washed off if it gets in the nose.
  
  Where was it?
  1. Mantrid Machine
    
    0
    
    1 February 2021 23: 53
    
    but not so long ago in the Far East, when they were told that if they did not get out of the territorial waters, there would be a bulk
    1. Vladest
      
      -4
      
      2 February 2021 00: 08
      
      Quote: Mantrid Machina
      but not so long ago in the far east,
      
      I remember, Is that all? Truly a grand incident. Congratulations.
      1. Mantrid Machine
        
        0
        
        2 February 2021 00: 57
        
        few? What else can you recommend urya-patriotic? Last year, they rammed in Baters in Saratov
  2. Rich Crassaffik
    
    +2
    
    2 February 2021 07: 22
    
    Everywhere, forgot how the cook ran away and changed personnel and diapers? And they sailed to the north of Korea and quickly sailed away. Do you need a photo of how the seals stood on their knees and cried? Take a look on int and refresh your memory.
    1. The comment was deleted.
steelmaker

0

1 February 2021 19: 37

..... there is good and evil in the world, so that there is balance.
There’s no less muck, but let her fear
there will be a moment of short flash and this muck will stop.
tifon69

+1

1 February 2021 20: 49

I believe that the American sailors had as much fun as their couch compatriots
Cat

+2

1 February 2021 22: 47

About US aircraft carriers. Well, why are they so dangerous to us? Who's to say? Well, each of them has an attack aircraft wing, 48 F-18. Let them carry a hundred AGM-158 CRBD. Are they going to raid Vladivostok, Sevastopol, Murmansk? And how long will it fly and how long will it return after meeting with our air defense fighters and S-300/400 air defense systems? What can an aircraft carrier do without attack aircraft? Stomp home until they drowned ... So where to be afraid? More information for thought: No one will send them under our air defense cap, in order to avoid serious losses in the personnel of the pilots. The most invaluable potential of any army in the world is its pilots. Well, let them carry a hundred AGM-158 CRBDs in the raid, and release them at a distance of 1000 km. from goals. So what? And how many CRs will get there? What for? If the same hundred Tomahawks are fired by two Burks, of which they have 80 and 20 more cruisers. So the role of their aircraft carriers has now decreased, they can perform strike missions only in subsequent strikes when the country's air defense is weakened. For us now Berks are more dangerous than aircraft carriers, of which there are only 11 ...
1. Ulysses
  
  0
  
  1 February 2021 23: 20
  
  About US aircraft carriers. Well, why are they so dangerous to us? Who's to say?
  
  We are absolutely not dangerous.
  The era of aircraft carriers ended after the second Gulf War.
  (just look at the proportion of land-based and sea-based flights, application efficiency, maintenance and service costs)
  
  My personal opinion, a waste of money.
2. onstar9
  
  0
  
  3 February 2021 05: 23
  
  Quote: Cat
  About US aircraft carriers. Well, why are they so dangerous to us? Who's to say?
  
  It is not aircraft carriers that are dangerous. The top that plundered the Motherland is dangerous. And it is clear that no real army will be there. For there is not enough money for "Palaces" ...
  1. Anatoly Demchenko
    
    0
    
    6 February 2021 07: 39
    
    In your homeland, internal terrorists have taken over the Capitol. Run to save
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

0

1 February 2021 23: 40

Amer AUG-and melt one more breath, we don't need them
shinobi

+2

2 February 2021 04: 47

Hmm. And what, now we have to react to every hee-hee idiots? I wonder if they at least understand that all their vaunted super fleet is completely useless on land in general and against Russia in particular? Apparently not. sushi in general. We can do without the rest of the world, there is no world without us.
PS: So strong that at the slightest real threat, they attack with lightning speed to the rear, away from the aggressor.
1. Michael Malovichko
  
  0
  
  6 February 2021 00: 03
  
  We can do it, but we just have a lot to do without - drugs, smartphones, Boeings, Fords and even oddly enough Lada.
  1. shinobi
    
    +1
    
    6 February 2021 04: 50
    
    Well, we have already passed this. A holy place is never empty. Remember? Restricted the import of food products from the West. The Opov media screamed in chorus Kaput!, Hunger is inevitable! angry, imports are more expensive and more profit gives.
Semyon Semyonov_2

+1

2 February 2021 08: 40

Toka, when he flew over you, you obviously did not laugh.
Licked off.))
just with.

+1

2 February 2021 14: 57

After the attack on Donald Cook of our unarmed torturer, the United States was tortured to change diapers and left in a crowd ashore ....
just with.

+1

2 February 2021 15: 00

have seen enough Hollywood shit - and they confuse fiction with reality --- the Vietnamese piled on us with all their technologies - the warriors only had time to change diapers ...
1. onstar9
  
  -1
  
  3 February 2021 05: 26
  
  Quote: just p.
  have seen enough Hollywood shit - and they confuse fiction with reality --- the Vietnamese piled on us with all their technologies - the warriors only had time to change diapers ...
  
  Well, it's hard to say who "piled on" whom ... For 14 Americans died, and 000 million Vietnamese ...
  1. Sapsan136
    
    +3
    
    3 February 2021 12: 43
    
    this is taking into account the losses of the local population of Vietnam, and a new war, even with North Korea, will end with a nuclear strike on US territory. See how the Yankees will like it, they are not bombing other people's cities. Let's see how the Yankees will like the burning cities of the USA
ali58

+2

2 February 2021 20: 28

Yankees will laugh at the cemetery! The one who laughs last laughs well!
bondxnumx

0

2 February 2021 22: 43

Last time, SS 24 was enough for this Donald, but now ours hinted that things need to be collected now! And then when they leave, they will forget on the ship tights, lips, hairpins, thongs, etc. !
Sapsan136

+2

3 February 2021 12: 41

It's time to drown the American ears. It's time to knock the arrogance off these American boors who have lost their shores, who climb to command in foreign countries. Death to the American occupiers!
1. Alexey Sergeev
  
  -1
  
  5 February 2021 09: 28
  
  Are you ready to be personally responsible for the consequences of "heating galoshes"?
  Or just scream and then into the bushes?
  1. Sapsan136
    
    +4
    
    6 February 2021 19: 18
    
    Are you ready to be personally responsible for the consequences of the lowering of the flag and the surrender of the Russian Federation to the Yankees following the example of the USSR, for the deaths of tens of millions of Russian citizens, from poverty, hunger and civil strife !? Are you eager to arrange the new 90s with a repetition of the genocide of the Russian people? This can only come to a traitor!
    1. Alexey Sergeev
      
      -2
      
      6 February 2021 22: 04
      
      How I like eccentrics who ascribe certain statements and intentions to the interlocutor, and then reproach him for them.
      They say so about women: she thought it up herself - she was offended
    2. Alexey Sergeev
      
      -2
      
      7 February 2021 01: 06
      
      And now essentially:
      there are international treaties on the law of the sea, which we have undertaken to fulfill.
      You can consider the Black Sea your own (this is not the case, there is at least +1 strong player - Turkey), but it is impossible to prohibit the passage of foreign warships in it (within the framework of agreements). Otherwise, contracts are worthless.
      Attacking a ship in neutral waters is like declaring war.
      What does all this have to do with it
      
      the consequences of the lowering of the flag and the surrender of the Russian Federation to the Yankees following the example of the USSR, for the deaths of tens of millions of Russian citizens, from poverty, hunger and civil strife !?
      
      hard to understand. Excessive emotionality is the enemy of objectivity.
      In the 90s, by the way, humanitarian aid was supplied from the United States and loans were given (to pay salaries to state employees, including). Obviously with the aim of starving everyone
      At the same time, in the 90s, 2-3 times less was borrowed than in the last 7 years of the existence of the USSR.
      1. Sapsan136
        
        +5
        
        8 February 2021 11: 18
        
        1) The entry of the US destroyer into the Peter the Great Gulf is a violation of the maritime borders of the Russian Federation, not international waters!
        2) Violation of the maritime borders of the Russian Federation off the coast of Crimea by the United States, these are also not international waters.
        3) The fact that the United States does not recognize Crimea as part of the Russian Federation does not channel it, they and the Kuriles do not recognize the part of the Russian Federation, and the Russian Federation does not recognize the islands transferred by the Yankees by the Georgian Shevardnadze as part of the United States, but nevertheless, the US borders, not even recognized by the Russian Federation, the Russian Federation violates ... And if the Yankees want war, no question, let's fight !!! Only to sit out overseas this time the mattress mats will not work.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        8 February 2021 19: 01
        
        Only to sit out overseas this time mattress mats will not work.
        
        Are you proposing to land a troop to them?
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        8 February 2021 19: 07
        
        There are difficulties with entering the bay, depending on the interpretations:
        
        https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4584798
        
        3) The fact that the United States does not recognize Crimea as part of the Russian Federation
        
        So the UN does not recognize him either, none of the former republics does (not even Batko). And Sberbank.
        Who should they focus on?
        
        Only to sit out overseas this time mattress mats will not work.
        
        And when did they sit out?
        
        And if the Yankees want war, no question, we will fight !!!
        
        Are you proposing to land a landing party for them? (Before that, having defeated all the fleets in the Atlantic and the Pacific, I suppose?)
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        10 February 2021 11: 56
        
        The missiles will fly, there are only two of them, along the faults in the earth's crust and all the coasts of the United States will not be, and in the middle there will be Chernobyl. So the Russian Federation does not recognize the islands transferred by the Georgian Shevardnadze as part of the United States either, is it weak for the United States to return them? Or maybe Ukraine, under the slogan of de-communization, will return everything that it grabbed from its neighbors under the Communist Party?
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 00: 28
        
        The missiles will fly, there are only two of them
        
        So what about the citizens of Russia (the majority) who do not have cozy bunkers with blackjack?
        In addition, this information shows a lot of "yellowness" and a desire to get some kind of miracle weapon. (Such aspirations do not arise from excess of strength)
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        11 February 2021 11: 36
        
        But don't the Yankees have a desire to get a miracle - a weapon that would allow them to destroy countries with nuclear weapons with impunity, following the example of Yugoslavia and the like !? Russia is closer to this today than the United States. The new nuclear warheads of the Russian Federation are capable of performing an anti-missile maneuver, have a tremendous speed, which makes them inaccessible for interception by American wunderflies of the CM-3 type, have stealth technologies ... The Russian Federation has no American ambitions, we do not want to rule the whole World, but we will not give up ours either. hack it on your nose.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 12: 35
        
        destroy countries that have nuclear weapons, like Yugoslavia and the like
        
        Remind me, how many millions of citizens in the former Yugoslavia were killed by the Americans?
        Is there a void in its place now? Or did it just split up like the former USSR?
        
        Russia today is closer to this than the United States.
        
        Why do we need to destroy someone with impunity?
        And this (impunity) will not work against a country that has nuclear weapons - a retaliatory strike would be catastrophic. Even from Britain.
        
        hack it on your nose.
        
        Are you talking to ... imaginary, I don't know, Biden?
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        11 February 2021 12: 43
        
        Divided and shared are different things. If the US is bombed for several months, they will also split, there are enough groups, races and nationalities that do not digest each other. In addition, counting those killed at the hands of the United States, you need to add those who died of poverty and conflicts, the cause of which was the intervention of the United States .... Personally, you have no reason to live, capitulators and traitors are not needed by anyone. You are everywhere grade 10
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 12: 56
        
        If the US is bombed for several months, they will also split
        
        England was bombed for several years during WWII, Scotland, Wales ran away somewhere?
        Yugoslavia was divided into nat. states, none of them became the new US state, right?
        
        Personally, you have no reason to live
        
        Are you communicating with someone imaginary again?
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        11 February 2021 13: 02
        
        So then, and now. England left the EU and Scotland again started talking about independence and today London is afraid of a referendum on this topic like the plague. On the territory of Yugoslavia, one of the largest US military bases. Mamai also planted a scarecrow instead of himself on the throne, which formally rule, but did not decide anything, so did the Yankees in Yugoslavia and its new non-states, which exist only on American bayonets
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        0
        
        11 February 2021 13: 08
        
        which only exist on American bayonets
        
        How? Is there a military dictatorship in these countries?
        
        On the territory of Yugoslavia, one of the largest US military bases
        
        We allocated an airfield for their needs to bomb the Taliban.
        Not for free.
        About nuclear weapons:
        Let me remind you that it was the United States that used its leverage to facilitate the movement of nuclear weapons from other former republics to the Russian Federation.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        11 February 2021 13: 12
        
        Is not it so! ? Kosovo is generally Yugoslav Ichkeria, which is ruled by scumbag Islamists and either a very naive, or very not very smart, or a very deceitful person can talk about some kind of democracy. Even the Yankees themselves complain about local scumbags and their poor control. Well, let's say the Yankee airfield was provided for transit and there were never any combat aircraft, only transport workers, so don't write nonsense. Well, it was easier for the Yankees to deal with one Russian Federation than with a handful of Basmachi separated from the Russian Federation, who were unable to organize its security.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 13: 42
        
        Well Yankees it was easier to deal with one RF
        
        Yes, if they were going to deal with the Russian Federation, that is, to continue the relationship.
        
        than with a handful of Basmachi who separated from the Russian Federation, who were unable to organize its security
        
        It is true that nuclear weapons would not accidentally appear on the sulfur market.
        
        Kosovo is so generally Yugoslav Ichkeria
        
        Yes, Serbia, Croatia, Montenegro, what's wrong with them? And how do they hold on to American bayonets?
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        11 February 2021 14: 01
        
        Croatia is holding on to them, and the transfer of nuclear weapons to the USSR by the Russian Federation was in the interests of the United States, so do not credit the United States to the Russian Federation for this.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 14: 18
        
        the transfer of nuclear weapons to the USSR by the Russian Federation was in the interests of the United States
        
        This is not how they behave in relation to the country that they have always dreamed of taking over.
        Could be bought back, or something.
        
        Croatia keeps on them
        
        And what happens without bayonets?
        And then there is Montenegro ..
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        11 February 2021 14: 48
        
        And without US bayonets, Serbia is smashing Croatian bandits at the expense of one ...
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 15: 53
        
        That is, Serbia will conquer Croatia, annex it? And Montenegro too?
        I would like to believe that the era of empires is over, in Europe, at least.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        11 February 2021 15: 55
        
        That is, Serbia is liquidating the bandit enclave of Islamic terrorists in Harvatia (a region of Serbia in which Croats are not an indigenous population) ... Well, the United States is also an empire that puts its puppets to rule foreign countries, whose power is based on the bayonets of the American occupation forces.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        0
        
        11 February 2021 17: 23
        
        Well, the USA is also an empire
        
        Empires do not have a federal structure, and the emperor is at the head. Which is not chosen. Or is it a figure of speech?
        
        puts his puppets to rule foreign countries, whose power is based on the bayonets of the American occupation forces
        
        Country examples?
        And how many bayonets must be
        
        That is, Serbia will liquidate the bandit enclave of Islamic terrorists in Harvatia
        
        That is, it will win, there will again be a war in the region.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        11 February 2021 18: 13
        
        Suffice it to recall Augusto Penocheta, a typically fascist regime that was fully approved and supported by the Yankees. The Croatian regime also rests exclusively on Yankee bayonets, and by the way I remember Hitler was not the emperor, but this did not prevent him from having American ambitions for world domination
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        12 February 2021 02: 19
        
        As it is not enough, only one country was named from the present time.
        
        Hitler was not emperor, but that did not stop him from having American ambitions for world domination
        
        Hitler was a dictator, had unlimited power. And no one ever chose him. President Hindenburg, under pressure from the NSDAP (who received a maximum of 35%, even then) appointed him chancellor, for all the Germans in trouble. And then the elections were canceled, the post of "leader" was introduced, etc. I changed the constitution for myself, in general
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +2
        
        12 February 2021 07: 47
        
        Come on ... Hitler was elected in the legitimate elections in Germany and I doubt very much that fewer votes actually voted for Adolf then than today for the clown Baydon, with his Parkenson ... And they have the same Wishlist - World domination.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        0
        
        12 February 2021 13: 39
        
        Find a couple of minutes on a busy schedule and study the question.
        Hitler was appointed by Hindenburg, the NSDAP had a 33% majority, plus pressure from a number of industrialists and bankers.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        12 February 2021 13: 58
        
        Hindenburg was appointed Chancellor, under public pressure, and he ended up in Reistag in a completely legal election. Moreover, Biden most likely did not gain 33% in reality. Pure scam.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 04: 16
        
        In fact, you yourself are now admitting that the landing will not work.
        
        So the Russian Federation does not recognize the islands transferred by the Georgian Shevardnadze as part of the United States either, is it weak for the United States to return them?
        
        Only one country recognizes? Little somehow.
        
        The UN General Assembly on March 27, 2014 adopted a resolution on the territorial integrity of Ukraine. 100 out of 193 UN member states voted for the document, 11 were against, 58 abstained [183]. The resolution emphasizes that "the referendum held in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol on March 16, 2014, having no legal force, cannot be the basis for any change in the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or the city of Sevastopol"
        
        We are told of significant influence, but where is it?
        You can raise the question of the ownership of the islands you mentioned in the UN.
        I wonder what you think about the "fraternal" transfer of part of the territories to China?
        
        https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1040911
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +5
        
        11 February 2021 11: 43
        
        I do not admit that it will not work to land a landing somewhere in Boston, I admit that I do not see any point in such a landing. Why do we need Boston ?! Is there little snow in the Russian Federation ?! The territories transferred to China are the flood islands on the river, which were offered to be given to China during the Soviet era, but then the policy of Stalinism in China and Khrushchev's insanity in the USSR prevented the settlement of the borders. After China, with a fool, gave Port Arthur and the port Dalny, there was no point in clinging to bullshit on the river ... But ALL of your Ukraine on the map of 1654, within the borders of which you pinned from Poland to Russia, everything else you have stolen goods. The lands on which Kharkiv is located belonged to Russia before Ukraine became part of Russia and the fact that you were allowed to settle there does not mean that these lands were donated to your country. Allowing someone to live in their apartment and donate it are two different things. ..What did the Yankees decide and their slaves do not bother me, they have no right to decide anything at all on Russian soil.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 12: 40
        
        ALL your Ukraine
        
        That's where people like that come from?
        I have never even been there, all 37 years I have lived in the Krasnoyarsk Territory.
        
        The lands on which Kharkov is located belonged to Russia
        
        Most of Russia belonged to the Mongols. So what?
        There are international treaties in force at this time. Everything is based on them.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        11 February 2021 12: 48
        
        It never belonged to the Mongols, there was the Mongol occupation of Russia and a number of other states, including China and both Koreas. So do not confuse sour with warm. International treaties were signed taking into account the commitments undertaken by Ukraine, such as its neutral status, and it gathered in NATO even under Yushchenko, which you cannot deny (let alone Ukraine's participation in the Georgian and Chechen events). And since one of the parties violated the terms of the agreement, then there is no agreement anymore and it is stupid to nod at it!
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 12: 52
        
        She never belonged to the Mongols
        
        How so? More than two hundred years. The same saint A. Nevsky went to the Khan for a label to reign.
        
        So don't confuse sour with warm
        
        This is an example that an appeal to the distant past can go far.
        
        she gathered in NATO under Yushchenko
        
        Sovereign state, can decide for itself
        
        And since one of the parties violated the terms of the agreement
        
        What a free interpretation of law
        It doesn't work that way. Have you even seen the lyrics?
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        11 February 2021 12: 57
        
        As I said, don't confuse sour with warm. Temporary occupation and territorial affiliation are different things. The Nazis were also in Khimki, about 15 minutes, until they were all killed there ... The state can decide, but if it signed an agreement with other countries and does not fulfill its part of the agreement, then it is silly and naive to believe that you can only have rights but not responsibilities. There are no duties, no rights, no neutral Ukraine, no recognition of its borders by the Russian Federation.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 13: 03
        
        There is no neutral Ukraine, no recognition of its borders by the Russian Federation
        
        What documents is this written in?
        Who said that you can not recognize the borders, for example, of Estonia?
        
        Temporary occupation
        
        200 years old. Some states exist for so long.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        11 February 2021 13: 15
        
        In the blind and the deaf. The fact that the Yankees promised not to expand NATO to the east is also well known to everyone. Ukraine's neutral status was spelled out in its constitution. A treaty of friendship was signed between the Russian Federation and Ukraine. The Russian Federation did not sign anything with the Bandera people and owes nothing to them, except for the gallows. There was also a century-old war in the EU, and WHAT ?!
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 13: 49
        
        The Russian Federation did not sign anything with the Banderovites and does not owe them anything
        
        Then why do our embassies exist there? Some negotiations are underway (on the transit of hydrocarbons, for example), all kinds of calls.
        And where exactly is Bandera? I was not too lazy to look: in the Rada in 2014, the Radical Party had 5%. Is this support? - Outcasts.
        And in the new convocation there is not a single party of nationalists at all.
        
        There was also a century-old war in the EU
        
        So we did not have a comparable war. The Mongols conquered and possessed it for 200 years.
        I repeat: this is an example of the fact that an appeal to the distant past is a dead end.
        
        The fact that the Yankees promised not to expand NATO
        
        In words, what is important. When the same Baltic countries asked to join the Organization, there were no formal reasons for refusing them. As a result, they accepted it.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        11 February 2021 13: 59
        
        Negotiations will not be held soon, but they have already been terminated, your Zelensky is already in a shake hands. JV-2 is being completed, and taking into account the fact that gas in Asia costs more than $ 1000 per cubic meter, and in the EU less than $ 400, then the Russian Federation does not need it .. Yes, you have all the Bandera people there, from Tymoshenko to Poroshenko. The Mongols were occupiers in the temporarily occupied territories of foreign countries, and today Ukraine is in this role .... Well, any treaty can be denounced. There is no agreement, no agreement ... The Supreme Soviet of Russia declared the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine illegal back in the 90s.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 14: 15
        
        Yes, you have all Bandera there, from Tymoshenko to Poroshenko
        
        You are talking to someone imaginary again
        
        and given the fact that gas in Asia costs more than $ 1000 per cubic meter, and in the EU less than $ 400, then the Russian Federation does not need it
        
        You should write about this to Gazprom, otherwise they don't know
        
        in the temporarily occupied territories of foreign countries
        
        The Balts say something similar about us.
        
        Well, any treaty can be denounced
        
        And where is the denunciation?
        
        The Supreme Soviet of Russia declared the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine illegal back in the 90s.
        
        Can you give a link?
        And where was this Council during the broadcast?
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        11 February 2021 14: 42
        
        I am talking to UKROP, who is long overdue to deprive the citizenship of the Russian Federation and deport from the Russian Federation VON, since I like Bandera, but I feel sick of rachism ... Everyone at Gazprom knows that they forgot this on Echo Matza ... Balts !? Russia bought the lands of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia from Sweden for gold, so let them either return the money or go to Sweden, since Russia doesn't like it, we don't keep you in Russia forcibly, you don't like it! .... On May 21, 1992, by the resolution of the Supreme Soviet of Russia No. 2809-1, the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine was declared illegal.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 15: 52
        
        I'm talking to UKROP
        
        Both father and mother are Russian.
        But in Nazi Germany there was the term "white Jews", in relation to the Germans who did not share the party line.
        
        Balts !? Russia bought the lands of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia from Sweden for gold, so let them either return the money, or go to Sweden
        
        Vladimir Volfovich, is that you?
        
        do not like go out
        
        So the Balts went ..
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        11 February 2021 16: 00
        
        Come on, drive it? Russians, like you, will not break their priests for the interests of states suffering from Russophobia, and even less will they begin to blunt and pretend that Ukraine, which slaughters Russians on a national basis, is not a fascist state. You call the actions of the Russian Federation rashism and write that it is equal to fascism, but you are not yet burned alive in the Russian sheds in the sheds, and your favorite Ukrainians burned the same Crimean anti-Maidan alive in buses ... As I already wrote, you realize your the crimes you committed against the Russian people only when the Russian Federation begins to treat you like a mirror ... which is high time to do ... by evicting you from the Russian Federation.
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        11 February 2021 17: 27
        
        Russians for interests
        
        Russians are very different.
        
        You call the actions of the Russian Federation rashism and write that it is equal to fascism
        
        You know, you have to answer for the market. Where and when did I say all the nonsense you cited?
        
        which is high time to do ... by evicting you from the Russian Federation.
        
        Who is "you"? Imaginary enemies?
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        11 February 2021 18: 19
        
        Well, yes, there are half-breeds and national traitors like you. And you and people like you are enemies. And at the expense of the bazaar, so your whole Caudle accuses the Russian Federation of all sins, not noticing even a quarter of Ukraine's sins
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -1
        
        12 February 2021 02: 25
        
        so your whole codla
        
        Tell me the names, otherwise I don't know anyone?
        
        not noticing even a quarter of Ukraine's sins
        
        I'm not interested in Ukraine.
        But it is interesting that my purchasing power since 2014 (despite being promoted at work) has decreased by one and a half times.
        Unlike officials and oligarchs.
        
        there are half-breeds and national traitors
        
        Saltykov-Shchedrin said: We often confuse the words "fatherland" and "your excellency." So now propaganda is deliberately mixing these concepts.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        12 February 2021 07: 44
        
        Yes, your entire Polish-Jewish party, Yabloko, with the Polish Jew Yavlinsky and others like him ... like Makarevich, who didn’t even have enough brains to finish his brains, they were out of order, but they are trying to play smart. You are in command in your Poland and Israel, but in the Russian Federation there is an indigenous population, which does not need (smart) advice from the Jewish lords ... Why didn’t you whine when your purchasing power was regularly declining after Judushka Gorbachev came to power ?! Why didn't the narrow-eyed Yeltsin's Alkanafta defaults ?! Yes, and until 2014, the ruble was regularly depreciating ... And then, in his entire life, Putin did at least something useful for the Russian Federation, returned the Crimea stolen from her by UKROP to the country, so you all worn out ... So you are confusing the country of residence (Russia) with love for foreign countries, from Ukraine to the USA ...
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        0
        
        12 February 2021 13: 29
        
        Why didn't you whine when your purchasing power was regularly declining after Judas Gorbachev came to power ?!
        
        Born in the year of his arrival. There was something to do, not up to politics
        
        did at least something useful for the Russian Federation
        
        Dropping the standard of living of citizens. And it seems he promised to raise.
        Ruined relations with many countries.
        What are the expectations for the growth of welfare? What are the 20 million high-paying jobs? Where does each family come from for a three-room apartment?
        One can only rejoice that "they wrested Crimea from the Khokhlov." (Which will now always be subsidized, by the way. And how to solve the problem with water?)
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +3
        
        12 February 2021 14: 01
        
        Well, the standard of living of citizens fell all the time before Putin, and under Putin, before the Crimea, it fell all the time. Just count, at least by eye, how many times the ruble has depreciated from 2000 to 2014, it's horror ... So why did the return of Crimea to Russia not please you?
        
        Alexey Sergeev
        
        -2
        
        19 February 2021 07: 25
        
        Count, at least by eye, how many times the ruble has depreciated from 2000 to 2014
        
        We look:
        2000, dollar rate 27-29 rubles.
        2013, course 30-33 rubles.
        You're right! The ruble has fallen catastrophically in 13 years, by an unimaginable 12%.
        With the growth of salaries at times.
        But since 2014, the rate has grown to 73r, calculate the interest at your leisure.
        A simple example: in 2014, I received the equivalent of $ 2000.
        Now, despite a slight increase in salaries at the enterprise and an increase at work, I get the equivalent of $ 1440. And prices are rising in proportion to the growth of the exchange rate, where most of the funds are spent on clothes and food.
        Now say that money is not the main thing?
Semyon Semyonov_2

+1

3 February 2021 18: 25

Right now, they cheered up, and when the drying of the horror was catching up with its current appearance, then they put full breeches.
1. Alexey Sergeev
  
  -2
  
  5 February 2021 09: 31
  
  Seriously?
  Tell me, how can the Su-24 threaten a modern electric vehicle? By ram? Cannon 23mm? Low-level bombing?
  At any time it could be knocked down by pressing a button, (with a Phalanx or a rocket).
  (Similarly, for never practiced fly-overs of the "Gorshkov" conventional F-111).
  They don't fight like that in the 21st century, and the crew knows it.
  But crash on the water, with an unsuccessful maneuver, is quite possible. And there were such precedents.
Alexey Sergeev

-2

5 February 2021 09: 27

Let's be objective: all these flights are just hooliganism. Show "valiant courage", sword dance in the 21st century. Not more.
There is no "training" in this. Or is it an attempt to practice conventional bombing? (Seriously?)
The real "study" looks quite different, from different distances (testing anti-ship missile launches).
zz811

0

8 February 2021 15: 13

but run like cowards when opposed

is it about Vietnam?
AICO

0

10 February 2021 04: 54

- They made fun of them after washing themselves, or right with diarrhea in their pants - this is the key moment !!!
1. Alexey Sergeev
  
  0
  
  12 February 2021 03: 50
  
  Answer: what could be a threat to a Su-24 flying close without weapons on its harnesses?
  By ram? Cannon 23mm?
  With all the arsenal of a class 1 ship ...