Russian Aerospace Forces repeated a training raid on a US destroyer, but with an expanded composition

58

American warships continue to enter the Black Sea to "ensure the safety of navigation." At the same time, the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy and the Russian Aerospace Forces meet the "guests" with the same regularity, giving them a "warm" welcome.

On the evening of January 28, 2021, the USS Porter (DDG-78) USS Porter (DDG-75) URO-class destroyer of the "Arleigh Burke" type visited the Black Sea water area, which was immediately taken under observation by the forces and means of the Black Sea Fleet. He went to join the USS Donald Cook (DDG-23) destroyer of the same type, which entered the Black Sea on January XNUMX and was conditionally destroyed during training by aircraft of the Aerospace Forces.



On January 30, the Russian Aerospace Forces repeated the training, but in an expanded composition. This time the USS Porter (in service since March 1999) was subjected to a training raid. Twitter Cyber ​​Diver published a diagram of approximate routes of flights of Russian aircraft participating in the said operation. It is clearly seen that the scale and geography have seriously changed in the direction of increase and expansion.


The planes were now involved not six, but eight (a pair of Su-30SM, Su-24M, Su-27 and Su-34). At the same time, they took off not only from two airfields in the Crimea, but also from an airfield in the Krasnodar Territory.

No doubt, "peace-loving" Washington will soon again express its concern about Moscow's "aggressive" behavior. We remind you that according to the Montreux Convention, warships and vessels of non-Black Sea countries can stay in the Black Sea for no more than 21 days. At the same time, their total displacement is limited.
  • US Navy/Patrick Gearhiser
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    31 January 2021 11: 19
    That's right, our pilots also need to train how to destroy enemy ships. And the electronic warfare system needs to be improved.
    1. -23
      31 January 2021 11: 41
      Since there are no own ships, let them train on strangers, especially the costs NO! Very soon Russia and the entire army and navy will move OFFLINE! Tremble the ENEMY !!!!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +5
        31 January 2021 20: 21
        Don't have your ships? Ahahahahaha ... Are you serious?
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. -4
        1 February 2021 09: 12
        Quote: Alexander K_2
        Since there are no ships of our own,

        And what are you lying? There are ships in Russia. Although for training, you can put a plywood board and call it "Donald Duck". )))
    2. +1
      31 January 2021 14: 41
      the same is true for their nato sailors to train in repelling air targets, well, the author exaggerated the raid of the usual overflight at a certain distance, otherwise the ships can open fire to kill
  2. -15
    31 January 2021 11: 38
    So why didn’t they destroy the entire US fleet, as I understood during the conditional “destruction”, the planes didn’t even uncover, they didn’t fire kerosene, they didn’t use the ammunition!
    1. -6
      31 January 2021 12: 09
      They "destroyed" it in a training raid. The Americans destroyed the aircraft as part of the naval air defense exercises. Everyone is happy.
      1. 123
        +9
        31 January 2021 12: 58
        They "destroyed" it in a training raid. The Americans destroyed the aircraft as part of the naval air defense exercises. Everyone is happy.

        The Americans have traditionally held exercises to change diapers. Fish and dolphins were unhappy. Who likes it when this is thrown overboard.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
        2. -8
          31 January 2021 14: 35
          Well, our flyers, upon arrival, handed over their diapers against signature. To dry and reuse. )
          1. 123
            +7
            31 January 2021 14: 38
            Well, our flyers, upon arrival, handed over their diapers against signature. To dry and reuse. )

            No. Shared with American sailors, right on deck. We left two copies for the great "friends" of the Americans, you and Kirill.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. -9
        31 January 2021 13: 13
        That's wonderful, even if the Russian Armed Forces continue to fight in Tanchiki, IL-2 and BattleShifts! The weapon is already available, from space to the depths of the sea and I believe all enemies will be defeated !!!
        1. +7
          31 January 2021 13: 26
          and the degenerate-okraintsy have neither their own fleet nor their own air force, so they have to play their nonsense on Russian websites
          1. -8
            31 January 2021 14: 57
            Why were they so worried, after all, they won, who prevents them from defeating all their enemies?
      3. -9
        31 January 2021 15: 13
        Now there will be awards in the Kremlin!
  3. +3
    31 January 2021 14: 43
    Without a doubt, "peaceful" Washington in .....

    Peace-loving Russian Aerospace Forces with the peace-loving US destroyer again peacefully trained, to the delight of the peace-loving media.
    What is so?
  4. -7
    31 January 2021 14: 50
    According to reports, the Aerospace Forces "conditionally destroyed" almost the entire American fleet
  5. +4
    31 January 2021 17: 02
    A repetition of yesterday's argument? No, thank you.
    What are the URO destroyers doing (and in fact under 200 missiles) off the coast of Russia and so far from their native shores? They will enter (they have every right) and there will be training to destroy them (they also have every right).
    1. +6
      31 January 2021 17: 44
      There is a maximum of 56 Tomahawks on Cook, everything else, these are anti-ship missiles and anti-aircraft missiles, all together 56 + 40 = 96 pieces.
      1. +3
        31 January 2021 22: 55
        I readily believe. Just recently they wrote that 100 Tomahawks are enough for Iran.
        The question is that these are sea-based medium-range missiles (thanks to Gorbachev). And they are dangerously close to Russia.
        As they write here, in response to flying around the ship, the plane can be shot down. Likewise, at the slightest danger, the ship can sink. Why are these provocations? And who is carrying out these provocations? Russian plane or American ship?
        1. +1
          2 February 2021 10: 41
          Who is carrying out the provocations and the horse is clear. It is enough to see where is the USA and where is the Black Sea
    2. -6
      1 February 2021 09: 17
      Quote: Bakht
      What are the URO destroyers doing (and in fact under 200 missiles) off the coast of Russia and so far from their native shores?

      I never met the stupidest question. I don’t touch politics, but Geography must be taught nevertheless.
      1. +5
        1 February 2021 09: 39
        I haven't seen the stupidest answer. And where in Geography are the States?
        And one moment. How can you not touch politics and teach geography? Take apart the word GeoPolitics ...
        1. -6
          1 February 2021 10: 16
          Quote: Bakht
          I haven't seen the stupidest answer. And where in Geography are the States?

          There is no point in your answer. Why is there the USA, You also have to teach History.
          He will study which shores and which ones are on the Black Sea besides the Russian one. This is the point.
          1. +6
            1 February 2021 10: 30
            Already on YOU?
            Well then. Geographically, there is no US coast on the Black Sea. Do you know that? This is the whole point. And it wouldn't hurt to teach you history
            1. -6
              1 February 2021 10: 47
              Quote: Bakht
              Already on YOU?

              Always on "YOU" with children and students.
              1. +6
                1 February 2021 10: 49
                I sometimes speak with both children and students. But with boors only for YOU.
                1. +5
                  1 February 2021 10: 50
                  Have you already found an American coast on the Black Sea on the globe of Ukraine?
            2. -5
              1 February 2021 10: 51
              So what other countries are there on the Black Sea coast, besides Russia? Then we will discuss the United States, why they are there. I will spend a little time to drive at least a tiny bit of knowledge into YOUR head.
              1. +5
                1 February 2021 10: 52
                Don't bother. Except for YOU, I also do not communicate with boors and ignoramuses.
                1. +1
                  1 February 2021 12: 12
                  Never argue with fools. First they will lower you to their level, and then EXPERIENCE wins.

                  - folk wisdom.
  6. -5
    31 January 2021 20: 35
    Quote: steel maker
    That's right, our pilots also need to train how to destroy enemy ships. And the electronic warfare system needs to be improved.

    - And how do the crews of the attacking Russian aircraft find out that their electronic warfare means effectively affect the radar of the destroyer ?! laughing lol
    1. +1
      1 February 2021 00: 39
      Do you so naively think that we only have electronic warfare on airplanes? I will upset you, there are super-powerful electronic warfare systems "Murmansk-BN" in Crimea, so if you use a destroyer from the shore, you may accidentally find yourself somewhere in the Belarusian sea))
      1. -5
        1 February 2021 09: 21
        Quote: Stanislav Bykov
        Do you so naively think that we only have electronic warfare on airplanes? I will upset you, there are super-powerful electronic warfare systems "Murmansk-BN" in Crimea, so if you use a destroyer from the shore, you may accidentally find yourself somewhere in the Belarusian sea))

        Enviable self-confidence. When will everything actually apply? In Syria, how did the militants stay, or do they not use all their might because of secrecy?
        Half of Syria is under the United States, isn't it time to expel them from there?
        As you can see, "There are words, and there are deeds."
        1. +1
          1 February 2021 14: 12
          Everything in due time, and we will finish off the militants and the Americans, we will not call Estonia for help
          1. -5
            1 February 2021 16: 07
            Quote: Stanislav Bykov
            Everything has its time,

            You have described contemporary Russia very accurately. Tomorrow, tomorrow, in the future.
            See the growth rates of Russia and its neighbors, especially the hated United States. And you will understand the further, the more you fall behind. If you start, now. Then it will be too late.
            1. +1
              1 February 2021 16: 16
              So already:

              An American military helicopter crashed in Syria, the US military believes that this happened under the influence of Russian electronic warfare (EW) systems.

              This was reported on January 20 by the profile aviation technical Internet portal Avia.pro.

              At the same time, Avia.pro claims that this is the third air crash of American helicopters, which happened in the northeastern part of the country, not far from the Russian military base in Kamyshly.

              According to the US military, the control systems in the helicopter suddenly stopped working. It was noted that the previous two accidents of American helicopters in this area occurred for similar reasons.

              https://regnum.ru/news/polit/3168523.html
            2. +1
              1 February 2021 16: 20
              And you will understand the further, the more you fall behind

              We are lagging behind in what? In the production of smartphones? In military technologies, we are already surpassing them in many ways
  7. +2
    31 January 2021 21: 39
    Our "partners" have kindly provided real full-size targets for training Russian aerospace forces.
    Hopefully the bill won't be rolled out ??
  8. -5
    1 February 2021 09: 09
    You can't see the boat on the map. Was it "conditional" too?
  9. -2
    1 February 2021 09: 42
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    And you so naively believe that we only have electronic warfare on airplanes? I will upset you, in the Crimea there are super-powerful electronic warfare systems "Murmansk-BN" so if you use a destroyer from the shore, you may accidentally find yourself somewhere in the Belarusian sea))

    - You didn’t study physics at school, student? You were not told there that radio waves (of the frequencies at which the Aegis SPY-1D radar operates) tend to spread only in a straight line!?
    И at best able to suppress this radar on the line connecting the ship and this very coastal electronic warfare station, how is it? Murmansk-BN? moreover, in a very narrow sector, slightly wider than the radar radiation pattern at 1.7 °:
    https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/07.naval/karte003.en.html
    But they are unlikely to suppress - the power of the radar is enormous - the peak is from 4 to 6 megawatts, the average is 58 kilowatts!
    Got it, Losers? laughing lol
    1. +2
      1 February 2021 14: 06
      Who needs its radar? These systems make the destroyer's reconnaissance equipment inoperative and knock down the ship's navigation systems, in addition, it is protection against high-precision weapons, which is why all NATO ships are afraid to come close to the shore and leave the Black Sea with nothing. So teach materiel. before the pompous throw
    2. 0
      1 February 2021 14: 08
      They didn’t tell you that radio waves (those frequencies at which the Aegis SPY-1D radar system works) tend to propagate only in a straight line !?

      What are you? You say you were an excellent student? Only in a straight line, then?

      Then remind us here of what effect the troposphere has on VHF propagation? (tropospheric radio communication).

      And by the way. S-band, even easier to suppress from the ground. It is enough to drown out the signal of the satellites with which the SPY-1D system is connected, and the Aegis went blind. Since we are talking about "Murmansk BN", then this complex operates in both HF and VHF bands.
  10. -4
    1 February 2021 18: 23
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    Who needs his radar?

    - Is it dumber to ask a question - did it come to mind?

    These systems make the destroyer's reconnaissance equipment inoperative.

    - What equipment ?! What do you know about this "equipment"?

    and knock down the navigation systems of the ship

    - And how do they "bring down" her ?? laughing lol And they do not shoot down GPS-navigators in all civilian vehicles in Crimea and its environs ?!

    in addition, it is protection against high-precision weapons

    - Are you sure? Do you really know how precision weapons systems work?

    that is why all NATO ships are afraid to come close from the shore and leave the Black Sea with nothing.

    - There is a 12-mile zone, no one comes closer without an invitation. But behind this zone - they walk as they want!
    1. +3
      1 February 2021 19: 14
      You watch the words, read what electronic warfare is and when and against whom it can be used and what effect it can have, and do not ask stupid questions so as not to look stupider than you are
  11. -4
    1 February 2021 18: 32
    Quote: Dear couch expert.
    They didn’t tell you that radio waves (those frequencies at which the Aegis SPY-1D radar system works) tend to propagate only in a straight line !?

    What are you? You say you were an excellent student? Only in a straight line, then?

    Then remind us here of what effect the troposphere has on VHF propagation? (tropospheric radio communication).

    - What "VHF", when I quite clearly said about the SPY-1D radar ??

    And by the way. S-band, even easier to suppress from the ground It is enough to drown out the signal of the satellites with which the SPY-1D system is connected, and the Aegis went blind.

    - I thought that since "respected", and even "X-perd", - so at least a little thinks - but no! The nonsense is just incredible !! What does GPS have to do with the radar of a ship, monstrous ignoramus ?? No radar station has anything to do with GPS... It's just some kind of dense zoo, there are sapiens ?!

    Since we are talking about "Murmansk BN", then this complex operates in both HF and VHF bands.

    - For the 33rd time I can repeat: what does the radar of the destroyer have to do with it ??
    In the era of World War II, he would have no value - but who needs him today ?!
  12. -1
    1 February 2021 23: 27
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    You watch the words, read what electronic warfare is and when and against whom it can be used and what effect it can have, and do not ask stupid questions so as not to look stupider than you are

    - I taught electronic warfare. wink
    1. +2
      2 February 2021 10: 46
      What you taught has long been a museum piece, so forget it. laughing
    2. +1
      2 February 2021 16: 37
      I taught electronic warfare.

      I don't know who and what you taught, but whether there are complexes like these in Israel or the USA:

      https://vpk.name/news/482303_russkoe_pole_kompleks_zashitit_sibir_i_ural_ot_dronov_i_raket.html

      Russia is the leader in this area, and all the advantage of the West in electronics in the event of a conflict will be nullified, thanks also to these "buns":
      https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/6328905/amp
  13. -4
    2 February 2021 00: 35
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    And you will understand the further, the more you fall behind

    We are lagging behind in what? In the production of smartphones? In military technologies, we are already surpassing them in many ways

    - Do not make me laugh.
  14. -1
    2 February 2021 10: 42
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    Everything in due time, and we will finish off the militants and the Americans, we will not call Estonia for help

    - ... or we'll leave ourselves, - well, they are in fig! laughing lol
    1. The comment was deleted.
  15. -1
    2 February 2021 10: 49
    Quote: Sapsan136
    What you taught has long been a museum piece, so forget it. laughing

    - Basic fundamental knowledge does not change for decades, my funny naive "opponent". You have to understand this ... wink lol
  16. -2
    2 February 2021 21: 19
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    I taught electronic warfare.

    are there any complexes like these in Israel or the USA:

    - EW complexes undoubtedly exist, that's what they are "like" - I don't know.

    Russia is the leader in this area,

    - WHO SAID THAT?? General Konashenkov? laughing lol And you believed it ?! Why ?!

    ... and all the advantages of the West in electronics in the event of a conflict will be nullified, thanks also to these "buns":
    https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/6328905/amp

    - I'll tell you why this is not true (just don't tell anyone!): Here is Syria, where a "limited contingent of Russian troops" is located. There is an agreement (as far as I understand) between the Israeli government and the Russian government: on the territory of Syria we do not touch each other... Great: Russian air defense systems are not trying to shoot down Israeli planes there. But who is stopping the Russian electronic warfare means from covering, for example, the international airport in Damascus ?! Because the Iranian warehouses with weapons there are systematically and periodically destroyed by Israeli aircraft! (The chatter that the overwhelming majority of weapons are lost by the Syrian air defense is bullshit and everyone knows about it).
    So put there a pair of "Krasukh-4", complexes "Krasukha-2.0", "Murmansk-BN", "Borisoglebsk-2", "Krasukha-S4", "Svet-KU", "Infauna", "Lesochek", " Resident "," Judoka "," Zaslon-REB "! And so that not a single Zionist bomb or missile falls on the sacred territory of Damascus airport! Where the valiant soldiers of the IRGC are bravely building up their missile potential to transfer Hezbollah to the head of the infidels in Israel!
    If these complexes are so wonderful, wonderful and wonderful - put a couple there? Train your Syrian brothers to press the necessary buttons there - and may everything be closed in the same way as you suppose on the territory of Russia in a possible war!
    BUT NOTHING LIKE THERE AND CLOSE HAPPENS.
    Question: why? Probably some creepy military ruse! laughing lol
    1. +1
      2 February 2021 22: 52
      WHO SAID THAT?? General Konashenkov? laughing lol Did you believe it ?! Why?!

      You are difficult, the Americans are also talking about this:
      https://rg.ru/2018/09/20/ssha-priznali-prevoshodstvo-elektronnogo-oruzhiia-rf.html

      I'll tell you why this is NOT true (just don't tell anyone!):

      You didn’t tell me anything, where our complexes are already standing, and they proved to be excellent

      BUT NOTHING LIKE THERE AND CLOSE HAPPENS.
      The question is why? Probably some creepy military ruse!

      Electronic warfare at the international airport? Is everything all right with your head?
  17. 0
    2 February 2021 23: 46
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    WHO SAID THAT?? General Konashenkov? laughing lol Did you believe it ?! Why?!

    You are difficult, the Americans are also talking about this:
    https://rg.ru/2018/09/20/ssha-priznali-prevoshodstvo-elektronnogo-oruzhiia-rf.html

    - Ordinary misinformation announced 2600 years ago by Sun Tzu: "If you are weak, pretend to be strong! If you are strong, pretend to be weak!" They pretend to be weak... They read Sun Tzu ...

    I'll tell you why this is NOT true (just don't tell anyone!):

    You didn’t tell me anything, where our complexes are already standing, and they proved to be excellent

    BUT NOTHING LIKE THERE AND CLOSE HAPPENS.
    The question is why? Probably some creepy military ruse!

    Electronic warfare at an international airport? is everything all right with your head?

    - You're so funny ... Damascus airport is a strategic facility, and military aircraft of all stripes and ranks are accepted there. It is there that the most advanced air defense systems and the most advanced electronic warfare systems should stand ...
    It's just some kind of kindergarten ...
    1. +1
      2 February 2021 23: 53
      military aircraft of all stripes and ranks are accepted

      Ours do not fly there, Iran and Syria have practically no combat aircraft what military aircraft of all stripes and ranks ??
      And civilians don't fly there?
    2. +2
      3 February 2021 00: 09
      The common misinformation announced 2600 years ago by Sun Tzu: "If you are weak, pretend to be strong! If you are strong, pretend to be weak!" They pretend to be weak. They read Sun Tzu ...

      This is otmaza good laughing okay compose your fables further, it's just a pity to waste time on you
  18. 0
    3 February 2021 00: 11
    Quote: Stanislav Bykov
    ... military aircraft of all stripes and ranks are accepted

    Ours do not fly there, Iran and Syria have practically no combat aircraft what military aircraft of all stripes and ranks ??
    And civilians don't fly there?

    - Civilians also fly, of course. But Israel is bombing there what the Iranian transport workers bring. There are warehouses with weapons on top of each other.
  19. 0
    7 February 2021 13: 33
    EM also needs to work out the air defense of a potential enemy. Mutual teachings have always been, and we are in the Indian Ocean with Avika "Midway". every day we flew 10-15 planes, and we practiced air defense missions on them. on and then BS service KTOF 74-77