In Germany, they told who is behind Navalny's film about "Putin's palace"

56

The film by Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny about "Putin's palace" is the product of a joint work of filmmakers from the US and Germany, writes the German edition of the Stuttgarter Zeitung.

In the southwest of Germany, in the federal state of Baden-Württemberg in the city of Freiburg im Breisgau, there is Blackforest Studios, a professional film studio owned by Nina Gwin Weiland and Sebastian Weiland. They worked for many years in the US film industry and in November 2020 they opened their own business in a picturesque corner of Germany.



The Weilands reported that as early as December 2020, "a production company from Los Angeles" was inquiring if Blackforest Studios had the time and opportunities to shoot certain footage. Having received an affirmative answer, the Americans offered to cooperate with Navalny. Work on the film began to boil, filming began with the participation of Navalny himself.

The studio operates at a high professional level with confidentiality. The final version of the film was made by a "production company from Los Angeles", the name of which the Weilands never announced, summed up the media from Germany.

Note that on the eve of the journalists of the Telegram channel Mash have been inside "Putin's palace". They exposed Navalny's "investigation", showing how this structure looks in reality. It turned out that everything that is said in Navalny's film is not true. The object, located 20 km from Gelendzhik, is a large construction site, the work on which will not end soon.

On January 30, 2021, Russian billionaire Arkady Rotenberg said in an interview with the Telegram channel Mash that he is the beneficiary of the said complex and plans to open a hotel there. The businessman promised to complete construction work in a few years.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    30 January 2021 18: 56
    I'm wondering who will be next?
    Will Navalny "work out", who will be the next number?
    Under Brezhnev there was Sakharov and several renegades, more recently - Litvinenko, Skripali, Nemtsov, Navalny. It's time to get used to it and not take too much steam.
    1. 123
      +6
      30 January 2021 19: 24
      I'm wondering who will be next?

      And I'm not interested, the fate of Asnge worries more.

      Will Navalny "work out", who will be the next number?

      Whoever earns money for the article will go. What's the difference as his last name?

      Under Brezhnev there was Sakharov and several renegades, more recently - Litvinenko, Skripali, Nemtsov, Navalny. It's time to get used to it and not take too much steam.

      Comparing Sakharov with Skripals and Litvinenko is strong laughing What is common between them?
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      30 January 2021 19: 36
      recently - Litvinenko, Skripali, Nemtsov, Navalny.

      Who will be next - apparently depends on the following.

      But what is actually significant is that you put the traitors to Litvinenko and Skripal on a par with Navalny.

      Did you do it deliberately, or did it happen?)
    4. +3
      31 January 2021 09: 03
      Syoma, with Sakharov, too, not everything is clear, it's clear ... While he had his first wife, he was a normal person, an excellent scientist, he understood everything as it should ... When his first wife died, then some Bonner appeared on the horizon. .. Where did this abomination come from, from what cesspool ... FIG knows him ... The result is interesting - after Sakharov's marriage, how they changed it! He was so carried away that one wonders - is he really the one? This is the person who suggested making the strait to them. Stalin in place of the United States?
      1. +2
        31 January 2021 13: 27
        some kind of Bonner appeared on the horizon ... Where did this abomination come from, from what cesspool ... figs know him ... The result is interesting - after Sakharov's marriage, how they changed it!

        Such a terrible aunt covered the smartest scientist. Her goal was to transport her daughter and son to the USA, which she did, and then she faded away.
        1. 0
          31 January 2021 19: 28
          In general - cYchapa ... It was necessary to bang it ...
    5. 0
      1 February 2021 14: 15
      Well, judging by everything, you will be next! wink
  2. +4
    30 January 2021 19: 06
    Well, here is the confirmation of the objectivity of the work of the journalist Sosnovsky.
    The Germans have merged the "waste material" quite well.

    Now Navalny will definitely be provided with permanent residence and a "dirty room" in the vastness of Matrosskaya Tishina.
    1. +7
      30 January 2021 19: 18
      It is unlikely that Navalny will be left in Matrossk ... Most likely he will be sent to the Kolyma, where Makar does not send his calves far ... But he must be given the longest time to blather less and keep his tongue shut ...
      1. -13
        30 January 2021 20: 08
        In fact, shame, you bastard, the king in the eyes of slaves.
  3. -10
    30 January 2021 19: 43
    Rotenberg pulled out a short match ...
    1. +11
      30 January 2021 20: 00
      Is this the Rotenberg who built the bridge while the villagers were gnawing power line poles like beavers? laughing
      1. -13
        30 January 2021 20: 06
        Yeah, for 100500 offiards and without any tender, and it is not known how many of them he put in his wide pocket. But he is not an oligarch, what are you, what are you, he is a "socially responsible businessman", but the fact that he is Putin's sidekick, maybe it's just a coincidence ...
        1. +8
          30 January 2021 20: 11
          I look Ukrainians have already come up with their own system of measures and weights))) even if they measured in parrots laughing
        2. +5
          30 January 2021 20: 56
          deal with your gutted waltzman. but don't get in here, they'll figure it out without you
          1. -5
            31 January 2021 12: 23
            Well, yes, in fact, they prevent the gentleman from admiring and still slander him!
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +3
          31 January 2021 13: 23
          No tender, because there were no volunteers. All businessmen understood that they would get them with sanctions. And Rottenberg is a friend. So coincidentally, don't have a hundred rubles, but have a hundred friends. And not one bridge, but TWO bridges! And not only he earned, but also thousands of those who developed the project (which is also included in the price), manufactured metal structures, mortars, asphalt ... And, I think, these thousands are not against participating in the work more than once. do you know.
        5. +2
          31 January 2021 19: 49
          I built it, and not like you only grind the language in Hohland, although the grandmothers disappear at the same time laughing
  4. -10
    30 January 2021 20: 02
    ... "Journalists of the Telegram channel Mash" - oh, how, three days ago, an unknown lone blogger, Navalny's exposer appeared out of nowhere, and now it turns out that a whole group of journalists from the Telegram channel is working ... Don't go deeper, the "green monkeys" come out - "Editor-in-chief of the Telegram channel Mash (he is also the director and co-owner of the publication) Maxim Iksanov lives in a house that belongs to the presidential administration.

    https://openmedia.io/news/n1/glavnyj-redaktor-mash-snyavshij-rolik-pro-dvorec-putina-svyazan-s-kremlyom/

    This is a residential building located at the address: Trekhgorny Val, house 12, building 2. Among Iksanov's neighbors there are State Duma Deputy Speaker Alexei Gordeev, the family of the former head of the presidential administration Sergei Ivanov and the sons of Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin.
    Mash is actually controlled by Stepan Kovalchuk, the son of the president of the National Media Group, Kirill Kovalchuk, and the grand-nephew of the owner of the bank Rossiya, Yuri Kovalchuk, Proekt wrote with reference to an interlocutor at NMG. According to Kontur-focus, 75% of Mesh LLC belongs to Maxim Iksanov, another 25% belongs to News Media JSC, the main owner of which is Sofia Mirzoyan. "
    But the Weilands from Blackforest Studios don't know this ...
    1. +8
      30 January 2021 20: 21
      Villagers, what do you care about ours?
      I, with all my heart, supported your chocolate hetman.
      He reduced your herd remarkably.
      And so much a clown hatman!
      He will cut you out with the help of tariffs no less.
      What is there! I will applaud the next one if he keeps the trend.
      1. +8
        30 January 2021 21: 02
        so same in their hohlyatskoy essence sits - to be glad that the neighbor's cow died. Austrians, Hungarians and Poles brought up this feeling in them for centuries, and this is the result - a new nation "Ukrainians" has been grown,
        1. -7
          31 January 2021 12: 26
          Well, yes, it's only the Russians who have an extra chromosome (most likely in 21 pairs), and the rest are untermensch.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      31 January 2021 09: 07
      Igor, and what does it change ???
      1. -4
        31 January 2021 17: 20
        And what changes if Navalny made his film with the help of American and European companies?
        1. 0
          31 January 2021 19: 30
          Yes, about this roll, and so everything is clear. He's like that I'm sorry ......... ka - working out the loot that he was paid ... But he works out so much obscenely that when his owners find out how disgusting he worked, they just bang him (because . FOR MORE IT IS NOT SUITABLE!).
        2. +1
          1 February 2021 01: 07
          And what changes if Navalny made his film with the help of American and European companies?

          For Navalny? Changes the article.
          Article 275 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Treason.
          1. -3
            1 February 2021 22: 57
            Is it high treason in Russia to disclose the lies of those in power?
            1. +1
              1 February 2021 23: 13
              Is it treason in Russia to reveal the lies of those in power?

              It depends on who and what to "reveal".

              Commentary on Article 275 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

              High treason in the form of other assistance to a foreign state, foreign organization or their representatives in carrying out hostile activities to the detriment of the external security of the Russian Federation means that a citizen of the Russian Federation enters into contact with the addressees and performs, on their instructions, various kinds of hostile actions against Russia. Other assistance can take place both in peacetime and in wartime, both on the territory of the Russian Federation and abroad.

              Source: http://ukodeksrf.ru/ch-2/rzd-10/gl-29/st-275-uk-rf "
              1. -3
                1 February 2021 23: 27
                I didn't quite understand - does it mean that disclosing lies and corruption in the highest echelons of power means harming external security and is a hostile action against Russia?
                1. +2
                  1 February 2021 23: 42
                  I didn't really understand

                  What's incomprehensible, then?
                  Navalny initially worked for foreign intelligence services, assisting them in conducting hostile activities to the detriment of the external security of the Russian Federation.

                  I don’t understand what lies you’re writing here all the time. If only a lie from Navalny himself, then yes.

                  PS By the way, since you position yourself as a thinking person, first explain to me what the Americans accuse Assange of?
                  What is it that this fighter for the truth has done so bad?
                  1. -3
                    2 February 2021 01: 18
                    What makes you think that Navalny worked for foreign intelligence services? Did you say it on TV?
                    1. +2
                      2 February 2021 01: 29
                      What makes you think that Navalny worked for foreign special services?

                      Do they send you information by pigeon mail?
                      1. -3
                        2 February 2021 01: 30
                        Well, I actually get information from the Internet, from sources not controlled by the Kremlin.
                      2. -3
                        2 February 2021 01: 33
                        And what about the lie, then we know what - about the palace. Only a tightly zombified copy can believe that the "federal channels" sound. And Assange is actually accused of crimes against the person.
                      3. +2
                        2 February 2021 01: 45
                        And what about the lie, then we know what - about the palace. Only a tightly zombified copy can believe that the "federal channels" sound it.

                        But what about the investigation of the German journalist Sosnovsky? In his film, he revealed all the lies of Navalny's film. Or do you not believe the German either? It's a direct conspiracy against poor Lyosha.)

                        Assange is actually accused of crimes against the person.

                        What kind of personality? What are you talking about?)
                        Do you even know who Assange is?
                      4. -3
                        2 February 2021 01: 48
                        Yes, in the course about Assange, he is officially accused of a sexual crime, maybe you didn’t know about it. And the "investigations" of the pro-Kremlin "journalists" are of little interest, in the West they know their value.
                      5. +2
                        2 February 2021 01: 57
                        Yes, in the course about Assange, he is officially accused of a sexual crime, maybe you didn't know about it.

                        So you are in the old course, comrade reader ukroneta.) This charge against Assange has long been dropped. Do you want to reset the link too, or will you find it yourself?

                        And the "investigations" of the pro-Kremlin "journalists" are of little interest, in the West they know their value.

                        Yes, they know and appreciate.
                        Alexander Sosnovsky. Editor-in-chief of the German magazine World Economy, if you don't know.
                      6. -3
                        2 February 2021 01: 59
                        Drop, drop, do me a favor, I wonder when this charge was dropped from him and what exactly this "hero" is accused of now.
                      7. +2
                        2 February 2021 02: 04
                        Drop, drop, do me a favor, I wonder when this charge was dropped from him and what exactly this "hero" is accused of now.

                        Here, the first thing that I found offhand ... everything is there, and about the dropping of charges for rape, and what they are trying to "hang" on him today. Read, and I sleep.)

                        https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/assange-neue-anklage-101.html
                      8. -3
                        2 February 2021 02: 01
                        Only nobody in the West knows about this Sosnovsky and his "investigation". Few people are interested in the opinion of the pro-Kremlin people.
                      9. +1
                        2 February 2021 02: 06
                        Only nobody in the West knows about this Sosnovsky and his "investigation". Few people are interested in the opinion of the pro-Kremlin people.

                        How do you know about the West?)
                      10. -3
                        2 February 2021 15: 18
                        From where you come from.
                      11. +2
                        2 February 2021 01: 37
                        Well, I actually get information from the Internet, from sources not controlled by the Kremlin.

                        Oh, how pathetic!) Such a hero wants to shake hands straight!
                        So I am not a bastard. Also "from different sources."
                        Here is the article a couple of days ago, this confirms:

                        Swiss media called the return of Navalny an operation of the German special services
                        https://topcor.ru/18401-shvejcarskie-smi-nazvali-vozvraschenie-navalnogo-operaciej-nemeckih-specsluzhb.html

                        So he worked all the same with foreign special services, rascal!)
                      12. -3
                        2 February 2021 01: 42
                        So this is the damned West, Geyropa - whoever wants something and writes, these are such tolerast. Only for a thinking individual, the Kremlin tales about the owner of the palace in Gelendzhik sound frankly anecdotal. Well, again, everything is in Topvar's style - an article in one newspaper is pathetic call the opinion of the Swiss media.
                      13. +2
                        2 February 2021 01: 52
                        So this is the damned West, Geyropa - whoever wants something and writes, these are such tolerasts.

                        Oh, that's it ... you now and the West did not measure the truth?)
                        What then? Ukrainian box that tells you how you dug the Black Sea?))

                        But for a thinking individual, the Kremlin tales about the owner of the palace in Gelendzhik sound frankly anecdotal.

                        Explain, please, and who is that "thinking individual"? Who are you talking about in the third person?)

                        Well, again, everything is in Topvar's style - it is pathetic to call an article in one newspaper the opinion of the Swiss media.

                        Oh, "we" are also distrustful?))
                        So here's the original:

                        https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nzz.ch/amp/feuilleton/nawalnys-heimkehr-eine-spezial-operation-des-deutschen-geheimdienstes-a-la-lenin-1917-ld.1598203?espv=1

                        I freeze in advance in front of you in a deep pardon, because the reference is not on the move. )
                      14. -4
                        2 February 2021 15: 31
                        The West is certainly much more a measure of truth than your Russia, and democracy, in particular the expression of different opinions, is one of its signs. And only a Russian box talks about the excavated Black Sea, no one has ever written anything like this in Ukraine. One of your yumorists came up with such a tight anecdote and away we go.No, there are of course such historians as Bebik, but he is as marginal as your Chudinov. Well, Fomenko and Nosovsky are up to the heap. who sit on their farm, muffle the vodka and can only read "Ababagalamaga". Do you talk about them like this on TV? And, of course, they love to crucify boys in shorts and fry bullfinches. And your link to one place - I I will find hundreds of you with the opposite opinion.
                      15. +1
                        2 February 2021 15: 43
                        And only a Russian box tells about the dug-out Black Sea,

                        I don’t look in the box, apparently here you know more than me.) Here are some surnames, unknown to me, as an example.
                      16. -3
                        2 February 2021 15: 44
                        Have you heard about your clown Chudinov, or about the fathers of New Khrenology?
                      17. +1
                        2 February 2021 15: 50
                        Have you heard about your clown Chudinov, or about the fathers of New Khrenology?

                        I say, I don’t look.) And I’m not interested. Don't distract me from my work. In the evening, there will be time, you can discuss.). Adieu.
                      18. -4
                        2 February 2021 16: 12
                        Well, actually, about these clowns just basically out of television. I don’t believe that such an experienced troll as you have not heard of them. Okay, in the evening we will discuss, if there is time.
                      19. +2
                        2 February 2021 16: 17
                        I don’t believe that such an experienced troll as you have not heard of them.

                        Thank you for the experienced, on the "troll" neighing heartily!)))
                        For all you know, they troll on other people's sites (that's how you are here). On their own - only patriots :)
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. -2
    30 January 2021 23: 31
    Ha.
    In 2011, when the very first film appeared, did the Germans also shoot? With an aquadiskotheque? She was then and then.

    And now it's not a problem to render 3D interiors ... Even without the State Department.
  7. +1
    31 January 2021 10: 02
    Immediately after the film, I wrote that Rotenberg was looming behind the former owner. When Putin stressed (!) That neither he nor his close relatives own it, everything became completely clear. A primitive way not to lie to which the people are still being led. He didn’t say who, he didn’t say he didn’t know. It would seem that it is easier - name the owner and the question is removed. It was obvious that name it and there would be even more questions.
  8. -3
    31 January 2021 11: 41
    What difference does it make how the investigation film was made? The main thing is the facts set out in it: transaction schemes with specific figureheads and nepotism, as well as an unprecedented scale and corresponding billion-dollar value worthy of Monomakh, and all this is under state protection.
    The film directly says that the shown decoration of the palace is a reconstruction based on confirmed furniture orders for Italian films. The fact that the mash confirmed the presence of the palace and its halls is only a confirmation of the facts indicated in the investigation itself, and not a contradiction. The investigation also says that the swim in the pool is not a photo, but a reconstruction.
    So Timchenko and Rotenberg threw on their fingers, which of them should take the rap for all this. fell to Rotenberg, who blasted nonsense about allegedly building a kitchen)? There is one kitchen area and one bedroom. Secondly, he has been building this for 15 years and there is no end in sight. This is possible just not for your money. Thirdly, why does an apart-hotel need an underground ice palace? Fourth, why on earth was a border guard post set up nearby and the airspace was closed, with the exception of the helicopter that will fly there with the guarded person. Similar questions can be enumerated.
  9. -1
    31 January 2021 12: 11
    more interesting - these filmmakers from germany and losageles and their entourage are already under our sanctions or the Foreign Ministry expressed concern and regret ????
  10. 0
    1 February 2021 14: 17
    It looks like someone got in trouble!