Navalny's money. How the country's main oppositionist is getting rich


My friends, today I have a super interesting material for you that sheds light on the financial aspect of the activities of our national lamp of democracy, a principled fighter against corruption, a heroic victim of the "bloody hebny" and the unkillable Terminator, and now a prisoner of "Matrosskaya Tishina" Leshenka Navalny.


A banquet of unprecedented generosity. Who pays for it?


Looking at the triumphal procession of the last video of our hero about Putin's palace across the Internet, where he has already scored more than 100 million views (and this is only the first week, what will happen next, I’m even scared to think!), You ask yourself an involuntary question - who pays for this a banquet of unprecedented generosity? After all, it has been hanging for the 8th day on the fixed 1st place of the 1st top-issue list of YouTube. And this, believe me, is a very expensive pleasure. Many YouTubers dream of this in order to wind up views, but not everyone can afford it. You pay here as for advertising at the advertising rates of video hosting. YouTube feeds from you, and you feed from YouTube. But this is bread for ordinary video bloggers, for such as Yuri Dud, Nastya Ivleeva, Anatoly Shariy and others.

For our hero, who is now languishing in the dungeons of the "bloody gebny", these crumbs, which the video hosting lists him for views (although for many of you it would be absolutely unthinkable money!), Are far from the main source of his income. He is also supported by the people who donate their pennies to all the purses of the FBK headquarters fixed there (ruble, dollar, YMONEY, PAYPAL, bitcoin wallet) to support his fight against the "bloody regime", taking this money away from themselves, just to withdraw to clean water this whole gang of thieves and crooks. For a holy cause, one might say! This is, so to speak, the official legend.

One ordinary blogger from America, "Sanya from Florida", devoted his investigation to the exposure of this legend. He is not even an opponent of Navalny, and more importantly, he is not a supporter of Putin, he is a US citizen, he doesn’t care at all, he is above the fight. He drew attention to those things that I would not even look at. I only noticed that someone is moving the products of our hero to the 1st page of the top results of YouTube, realizing that this is a marketing promotion and very expensive. But Sanya from Florida went even further, he got into the wallets of our hero (more precisely, the headquarters of the FBK) and tracked who they belonged to, and what amounts were pumped through them, and came to absolutely awesome results.

There, on unknown paths, there are traces of unseen animals


My friends, those of you who are older, should remember the legendary film of our youth "In the Zone of Special Attention" (1977), where the paratroopers of Lieutenant Tarasov (performed by Boris Galkin, better known to young viewers as the father of Vladislav Galkin, who left us ) in the course of military exercises as part of a reconnaissance and sabotage group, they solve difficult tasks, confronting both fugitive recidivists-criminals, and the intrigues of their conditional opponents in these exercises - "Northern". There was an episode when Tarasov's group was ambushed at the ZKP (disguised command post) of a mock enemy, and only when they got there, they realized that the ZKP was a fake, created by the enemy to distract attention. And, having fallen into this trap, they thereby let down their command, not having solved the task assigned to them. And it would be a complete fiasco if Warrant Officer Volentir (performed by the legendary Mihai Volontir) did not find in all this props the only real object - a communication cable stretching from the checkpoint of the fake ZKP somewhere. It is through this cable, which the "Severnye", due to their negligence, did not manage to wind up, our heroes and go to the real ZKP of the enemy and solve the task assigned to them - the forces of the airborne regiment, landing directly on the ZKP, smash it.

Why am I telling you all this, it's just that Sanya from Florida found the only real object at Navalny's fake command post - his headquarters' bitcoin wallet. And through it, like a cable, I went to all the conspiratorial sponsors of our hero, good technology the blockchain on which all digital currencies are based allows this to be done. The fact is that the technological breakthrough of all these currencies is based on one fundamental thing, they use a completely unique block-chain technology, based on the system's capabilities to process large amounts of data (big dates), which allows pulling the tip to reach its end. unwinding it to the very beginning. The uniqueness of cryptocurrencies lies in the fact that they allow you to track all transactions of their customers, the entire history of the movement of money, leaving the customers themselves incognito. Truly endless opportunities for all kinds of fraudsters of different varieties and intelligence of all countries. What they actually use, and it is for this reason that the crypt is still outside the law, i.e. in a semi-legal position.


Of course, you will watch the video of Sani from Florida (it is short, only 20 minutes). There he unwound just one tail of the receipt of money at the headquarters of our hero. Just one, in one day. And I have already reached the absolutely mind-blowing numbers of injections of unknown sponsors into the project of our fighter against corruption. Unknown sponsors operate with bitcoins. The cue ball exchange rate fluctuates, at its peak it recently caught 38 thousand dollars for 1 bitcoin (now it fluctuates around 37,750 thousand USD, before that there were 7 thousand, 12 thousand, and 14 thousand). During the day tracked by Sanya from Florida, Navalny received some unfortunate 10 BTC from a generous unknown sponsor from a generous unknown sponsor, which at the current rate at that time was 105 thousand USD. On other days, other unknown sponsors of the project threw small things there too (apparently for them) - 14 BTC, 13 BTC, 20 BTC, 12 BTC, 9 BTC, 8 BTC, 5 BTC, 6 BTC, the list is long (Sanya leads by adsorbing the data into a single table). These are all one-time payments. 105 thousand dollars turned out to be the largest only because of the current BTC / USD rate at that time. In the table, Sanya filtered the receipts by amount, grouping them in descending order from largest to smallest, so you can see the movement of money in the account from the largest injections to the smallest. Amounts vary from 105 thousand, 93 thousand, 92 thousand, 91 thousand, 83 thousand, 81 thousand, 80 thousand, 58 thousand, 55 thousand and further down to zero. Let me remind you that we are talking about one-time payments in US dollars!

Do you know a lot of people who receive (I can't say earn) 100 thousand US dollars a day? I will not bring you the salary of the President of America, so as not to upset him, believe me, he gets much less! Although no, I will nevertheless say that since 2001 this figure has been fixed, the annual salary of the US president is 400 thousand USD (about 33 thousand dollars / month). The salary of the Vice President of the United States is even less - 235 thousand dollars / year (19,5 thousand USD / month). Against the backdrop of Navalny, US senators are simply poor homeless people - 174 thousand USD / year. Bulk gets so much a day! I don't even want to talk about the saber-toothed dictator Putin, even against the background of US senators, he looks like a poor relative with an income for 2019 (for 2020, data has not yet been received) of 9,7 million rubles. (at the exchange rate it is 126 thousand US dollars / year). Where is Putin and where is Navalny? Who is fighting whom ?! It reminds me of the fight of mice against cheese.

Sanya sums up this struggle. For the entire period since the creation of this bitcoin wallet, 3,6 million US dollars were transferred to it, a little more was withdrawn due to the increased BTC rate. In rubles, this looks even clearer - 205 million rubles were received, 225 million rubles were withdrawn. I remind you that this is only one of the wallets of our hero, and only on the FBK portal there are four of them. I'm not even talking about the money from monetizing his views on YouTube, although even Dud could envy them, he has more subscribers (8,69 million versus 6,27 million for Navalny), and fewer views. Although Dud also lives with them robustly, having nailed up about 1 million dollars over the past year (although this million also comes from advertising). I think that Navalny has other sources of income that do not need to be shown on the Internet at all (SIS and CIA do not like to advertise the income of their paid agents, for those who do not understand English abbreviations, these are MI6 and the CIA, foreign policy services intelligence services of Britain and the United States). Oh, you don't believe Putin's tales about the paid agent Lesha Navalny? Well, then Sanya from Florida is coming to you! He tracked only one payment to our hero's bitcoin wallet. Only one! And he came to awesome results. About them below.

Who dined the girl, he dances her


Taking the most generous Pinocchio sponsoring our hero, the one who threw him 10 BTC or 105 thousand US dollars, Sanya went to his account in his bitcoin wallet. And stunned! Buratino turned out to be not only generous, but also rich. At the moment, on January 28, 2021, more than 1 million bitcoins were pumped through his account, which at the current exchange rate is about $ 38 billion. Do you know a lot of such people? In the Forbes list, they end with the first three lines. There are only transactions on this account over 30,130 thousand. Very active Pinocchio! What connects him with Navalny? And this is definitely not intelligence, they do not burn so cheaply, why should they transfer money to the FBK account, if Navalny can immediately? Maybe the State Department? These friends can, all the more, everything is sewn-hidden, incognito, and the money goes not to Navalny himself, but to a good cause, to his project to collapse the Evil Empire.

It was earlier that Leshenka had to rob "Kirovles" and "Yves Rocher", for which he shakes his term on bunks. Or getting ready to wind. And now, when he has reached the international level, it seems to him some kind of childish babble on the lawn, which the elderly Kremlin satrap, mired in corruption money, "sews" for him. What "Kirovles", what fraud and theft in "Yves Rocher"? I am an international swindler, practically a politician, five minutes before the Nobel Peace Prize-2021 laureate, I work on a large scale, why are you sewing some little pot-bellied thing for me ?! As they say, do not ask me about the first million, but about the second I can tell you everything myself. The funny thing is that our hero cannot tell everything about the second million either. Debit does not add up to credit! The money that grannies send him in the form of donations, taking them away from their pensions, to fight the regime, is clearly not enough to cover the balance of FBK's expenses. So you have to use the services of unknown generous Buratins, who were brought to clean water by the attentive Sanya from Florida.

Think at your leisure, why do you need a servant of someone's masters as the President of the Russian Federation? Look at Ukraine, a similar clown is already sitting there. His owners even broke into congratulating him on his birthday on January 25. Because the clown is no match! Where is Ukraine now? Do you want to be there ?!
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Little Muck_2 Offline Little Muck_2
    Little Muck_2 (Little Muck) 1 February 2021 07: 46
    -15%
    And it never occurred to you, dear, that all these transfers may be from interested persons in our country, in order to substitute Lyokha, and then slander with your hands !?
    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Wolf) 1 February 2021 18: 58
      +3
      vilify me so I agree! At the same time, I ask you to note, the US citizen denigrates him, what are the claims to me? do you not like your image in the mirror? spit on him!
      1. Alenta Offline Alenta
        Alenta (Asya Yasina) 7 February 2021 01: 30
        -2
        Can't Putin have accomplices in the US? That's funny. For Putin, this is not money at all.
    2. 1Maks Offline 1Maks
      1Maks (Max) 4 February 2021 08: 17
      +2
      Yeah, and for these transfers, he drove on holidays over the hill 5-7 times a year, and they poured money into him to "substitute".
      1. Alenta Offline Alenta
        Alenta (Asya Yasina) 7 February 2021 01: 31
        -2
        Show evidence.
    3. Aleksey2691 Offline Aleksey2691
      Aleksey2691 (Alexey) 6 February 2021 14: 45
      +2
      So what's the matter, let Lech transfer all the money to a charity fund for children for medicine. And fsë! No stands!
    4. igor.igorev Offline igor.igorev
      igor.igorev (Igor) 6 February 2021 21: 12
      0
      Set up this bastard? He set himself up when he agreed to work for the State Department and the CIA.
      1. Alenta Offline Alenta
        Alenta (Asya Yasina) 7 February 2021 01: 32
        -2
        have you personally seen the contract?
        1. igor.igorev Offline igor.igorev
          igor.igorev (Igor) 7 February 2021 15: 29
          0
          Of course no. But the fact that this one works for the State Department and the CIA is beyond doubt.
  2. Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 1 February 2021 08: 26
    -8
    Can you still separate the two hypostases of Lyokha? As a politician, he simply does not exist, and to speak seriously about him as a potential president is not serious, but as a denouncer of the authorities ... They do not fight him as a politician, they fight as a source of dangerous information.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 1 February 2021 11: 08
      -7
      If not Navalny, then who? Seriously, why not a politician? He has his own voters, as shown by the Moscow elections, he strives to gain power. In my opinion, we have a few politicians in the Russian Federation. And literally. Who else is a politician? Putin. And that's all.
      1. Dear sofa expert. 2 February 2021 11: 30
        +3
        Seriously, why not a politician? He has his own voter, as shown by the Moscow elections

        At the elections in Moscow, he used a cheap populist trick: he called for stricter entry rules for "dark-haired emigrants", understanding the "fatigue" of Muscovites from "come in large numbers". Hence the high percentage. If this is politics, then I am Napoleon.)

        What you can't deny Navalny is his sense of humor.

        Since the creation of "R (A) ospila"),
        and ending with the ego program:

        Change Rossi (I) u, start from Moscow

        Sawed up donation funds (for which we "blaspheme", betrayed the Motherland, (starting with Moscow). - For what we "sit".)
        Everything is as planned.
        1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
          Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 3 February 2021 07: 37
          -3
          Quote: Dear sofa expert.
          Used a cheap populist trick in the Moscow elections

          Everyone in the elections uses a cheap populist trick. The postponement of the increase in housing and communal services for the summer in 2018 is not cheap?
          Judging by the fuss that the authorities have thrown around Navalny now, on the eve of the elections to the Duma, the authorities are afraid of his influence on voters.
          1. Dear sofa expert. 3 February 2021 09: 14
            +2
            Everyone in the elections uses a cheap populist trick.

            All, but not all. There are limits of decency. In the west, for such a "blow below the belt" he would immediately be branded "ultra-right". Smells of discrimination based on ethnicity, you know.

            Judging by the fuss that the authorities have thrown around Navalny now, on the eve of the elections to the Duma, the authorities are afraid of his influence on voters.

            Do not speak nonsense. Navalny is a weapon of Western intelligence services. He has nothing to do in the elections, you yourself understand that.
            He is assigned the role of "troublemaker".
            By the way, what happened to Guaido, don't you know?
            1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
              Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 4 February 2021 00: 15
              -2
              Quote: Dear sofa expert.
              All, but not all. There are limits of decency. In the west, for such a "blow below the belt" he would immediately be branded "ultra-right". Smells of discrimination based on ethnicity, you know.

              But we are in the Russian Federation. There are other limits of decency here. When Putin pushed through his amendments about zeroing, he shamelessly flirted with the nationalist feelings of fellow citizens, adding to the constitution a passage about the language of the state-forming people, but this did not cause righteous anger in you. It often happens, you can see a speck in someone else's eye, you don't notice a log in your own.
              By the way, what did Navalny say about the rules of entry? As far as I remember, he offered to strictly observe the current legislation on this issue. I live in St. Petersburg, I did not particularly follow.

              Quote: Dear sofa expert.
              Do not speak nonsense. Navalny is a weapon of Western intelligence services. He has nothing to do in the elections, you yourself understand that.

              What is nonsense? If it were nonsense, the plane would not be put into another airport, the floor of Moscow would not have been blocked, Navalny would not have been planted in the end with the danger of receiving a new portion of sanctions from the EU and America.
              That Navalny's someone's weapon is your unconfirmed fantasies. I think the Western intelligence services are quite happy with Putin.
              He is supported by some of the citizens of the Russian Federation. In large cities, not a small part. These citizens have the right to elect their representatives to elected bodies. Why they were deprived of this right is not clear. More precisely, it is clear, but not legal.

              Quote: Dear sofa expert.
              He is assigned the role of "troublemaker".

              Appointed by whom? Have you come up with it yourself?

              Quote: Dear sofa expert.
              By the way, what happened to Guaido, don't you know?

              No, not in the know. What?
              1. Dear sofa expert. 4 February 2021 01: 34
                +2
                No, not in the know. What?

                The EU has officially distanced itself from Guaido, and has refused to continue to consider him the president of Venezuela.
                Now he is just a "famous member of the opposition."
                As for me, they just used a person and threw him away like a used condom.

                Parallels, I think there is no need to lead? Can you guess yourself?
                1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                  Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 4 February 2021 13: 25
                  -3
                  Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                  The EU has officially distanced itself from Guaido, and has refused to continue to consider him the president of Venezuela.
                  Now he is just a "famous member of the opposition."

                  AND...? I live in the Russian Federation, what does it matter to me?
                  I don't know how the EU used Guaidó, but he definitely enjoyed the support of the EU in his power struggle.

                  Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                  Parallels, I think there is no need to lead? Can you guess yourself?

                  In your world, some secret world behind the scenes conspires to overthrow independent leaders and plunge the world into chaos. But in the real world there are no conspiracies, if there is an external influence on events within countries, then it is definitely not determining and the main engines of the processes are within these countries.
                  1. Dear sofa expert. 4 February 2021 13: 37
                    +1
                    I don't know how the EU used Guaidó, but he definitely enjoyed the support of the EU in his power struggle.

                    So that's exactly what I'm talking about. There is no support from the people for Navalny. There is support from Western countries that act exclusively in their own interests. They initially promoted him, preparing him for the role of "troublemaker". And people like you happily pick up all these, in fact, "not very friendly" undertakings, and spread this rubbish further to the people.
                    Consciously or not (it's up to you), take the path of banal collaboration. Navalny is a weapon of Russia's enemies, and you are Navalny's accomplice.

                    In your world, some secret world behind the scenes conspires to overthrow independent leaders and plunge the world into chaos. But in the real world there are no conspiracies, if there is an external influence on events within countries, then it is definitely not determining and the main engines of the processes are within these countries.

                    Tell the American “Democrats” about this, who accused Russia of interfering in their 2016 elections.)

                    By the way. There was no interference in the 2020s, as they were satisfied with the election result.)
                    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 5 February 2021 09: 59
                      -4
                      Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                      So that's exactly what I'm talking about. There is no support from the people for Navalny.

                      Do not speak for the whole people, no one authorized you to do this. Some citizens of the Russian Federation have support, and not a small part.

                      Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                      There is support from Western countries that act exclusively in their own interests. They initially promoted him, preparing him for the role of "troublemaker".

                      You are chanting your mantras again. Are they based on anything other than your faith?

                      Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                      And people like you happily pick up all these, in fact, "not very friendly" undertakings, and spread this rubbish further to the people.

                      You're talking about conspiracy theories again. As well as the main thing, who among Russians promoted? It is not necessary to keep citizens for fools.

                      Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                      Consciously or not (it's up to you), take the path of banal collaboration. Navalny is a weapon of Russia's enemies, and you are Navalny's accomplice.

                      Why are you talking nonsense? It can be turned in another way. The main enemy of Russia, which will bring it to collapse, is corruption devouring it from the inside, no Beginners with the State Department have ever stood in comparison with it. Accordingly, everyone who supports corruption is an enemy of Russia. The authorities of the Russian Federation are part of this corrupt vertical, they are enemies of Russia. All who support the government, support corruption, support Russia's enemies. Whether you consciously or not (it's up to you), you support Russia's enemies. It turns out that you are an accomplice of Russia's enemies.

                      Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                      Tell the American “Democrats” about this, who accused Russia of interfering in their 2016 elections.)

                      By the way. There was no interference in the 2020s, as they were satisfied with the election result.)

                      Again a conspiracy? In 2016, it was said that the interference did not affect the elections.
                      1. Dear sofa expert. 5 February 2021 10: 15
                        +3
                        Do not speak for the whole people, no one authorized you to do this.

                        And you, even more so no one authorized, as an obvious and de facto - an insignificant minority.

                        In 2016, it was said that the interference did not affect the elections.

                        Yes? Who said, and most importantly, who heard it?

                        You'd better tell this to Trump himself, whom this entire presidential term was spreading rot and did not even allow him to get close to Putin. What kind of relations between America and Russia can we talk about if the American president was afraid to even take a step towards Russia, so as not to harm his image?

                        You talk nonsense here over and over again!
                      2. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                        Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 6 February 2021 01: 54
                        -4
                        Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                        And you, even more so no one authorized, as an obvious and de facto - an insignificant minority.

                        Where did I speak on behalf of the people? You are an amateur to declare this on behalf of the people. I gave you the polls, 20% of the country's citizens support Navalny. This is not an insignificant minority. I want to remind you that in 1917 the absolute majority of the population of the Russian Empire was in favor of "faith, tsar and fatherland," but this did not prevent an active minority from coming to power. But in any case, the main culprits of such events are the authorities, which were unable to adequately respond to the challenges of the time, more inclined towards conservatism, protection and repression.

                        Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                        Yes? Who said, and most importantly, who heard it?

                        https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/5372688?amp

                        There is no evidence that the interference affected the vote count or the election result

                        Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                        You'd better tell this to Trump himself, whom this entire presidential term was spreading rot and did not even allow him to get close to Putin. What kind of relations between America and Russia can we talk about if the American president was afraid to even take a step towards Russia, so as not to harm his image?

                        Yes, I agree, for the United States, Putin is the ideal president of the Russian Federation.

                        Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                        You talk all sorts of nonsense here over and over again!

                        Look who's Talking.
                      3. Dear sofa expert. 6 February 2021 09: 18
                        +2
                        I want to remind you that in 1917 the absolute majority of the population of the Russian Empire was in favor of "faith, tsar and fatherland," but this did not prevent an active minority from coming to power. But in any case, the main culprits of such events are the authorities, which were unable to adequately respond to the challenges of the time,

                        1917? You gave a good example here on the topic: how not to do!
                        By the way, analogies between Navalny and Lenin have already been cited (but this is just a word).

                        But why go so far then?). There is an example that is closer and more indicative of our topic.
                        Vaughn, quite recently, in Ukraine, a minority dissatisfied with the government, which, allegedly, “could not adequately respond to the challenges of the time,” seized power.

                        Life has become better, life has become more fun! (The neck became thinner, but for that longer).

                        Do you really support that?
          2. Dear sofa expert. 4 February 2021 01: 49
            +3
            All this imaginary popularity of Navalny, promoted by the western mainstream, and inspired by such "optimistic maximalists" like you, will end as suddenly as it began. The Moor has done his job, the Moor can rest (in the “Matrosskaya Tishina”), and after 3 years no one will even remember this person. Zero.
            1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
              Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 4 February 2021 14: 19
              -3
              Quote: Dear sofa expert.
              All this imaginary popularity of Navalny, promoted by the Western mainstream, and inspired by such "optimistic maximalists" like you, will end as suddenly as it began.

              This, again, is your addiction to conspiracy theories, that someone is promoting someone somewhere somewhere. This fantasy of yours has no justification from the word at all. Part of the society is tired of the power of the security forces in general and the GDP in particular, does not agree with the chosen path. And this fatigue at the moment is partly manifested in the form of support for Navalny. There will be no Navlny, there will be another person.
              And you are mistaken, Navalny is not my inspirer, yes, some of our views coincide, but not all.

              Quote: Dear sofa expert.
              The Moor has done his job, the Moor can rest (in the “Matrosskaya Tishina”), and after 3 years no one will even remember this person. Zero.

              What deed did the Moor do, who decided that he could leave, who authorized him to do this? These are all conspiracies again.
              1. Dear sofa expert. 4 February 2021 14: 29
                +1
                It's again your addiction to conspiracy theories

                Yes, of course, everything that I write here is my "predilections", my view of things. I do not pretend to be the Voice of God.

                Part of society is tired of the power of security officials in general and GDP in particular ...

                Listen, you, with your demagoguery, can just as well justify: ... "the fatigue of society from a peaceful life." Well, society is tired of living peacefully, tired of order and stability .. but let's change something! well, just like that .. to change! Tired of the same monotony! " A revolution? yes cool! Not the first time! What? For that you are happy. You have a "movement".

                What deed did the Moor do, who decided that he could leave,

                With the name of this "Moor", another precedent was created for putting pressure on Russia. Sanctions ... sanctions ...

                Maybe you are right. It's not time to leave yet .. can still serve as some kind of "Magnitsky".
                1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                  Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 6 February 2021 01: 38
                  -3
                  Quote: Dear couch expert.
                  Yes, of course, everything that I write here is my "predilections", my view of things. I do not pretend to be the Voice of God.

                  But it turns out that your view is based on belief in conspiracy theory. And besides this belief, your views are not based on anything.

                  Quote: Dear couch expert.
                  Listen, you, with your demagoguery, can just as well justify: ... "the fatigue of society from a peaceful life." Well, society is tired of living peacefully, tired of order and stability .. but let's change something! well, just like that .. to change! Tired of the same monotony! " A revolution? yes cool! Not the first time! What? For that you are happy. You have a "movement".

                  Well, why are you talking nonsense again. And something changes his mind for me. One of Putin's "achievements" is the African level of inequality. Or the government will not fight it (as it is now), the level of protests will grow.
                  https://www.rbc.ru/economics/16/12/2017/5a33e2fc9a79471b6d846e24
                  Do you know what Cronism is? Many of Putin's friends have become billionaires, it doesn't have to be that way. This provokes a protest.
                  If you think that all the protesters with the feat of the State Department, you are mistaken. No one has done more than the Russian authorities have done for this.

                  Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                  With the name of this "Moor", another precedent was created for putting pressure on Russia. Sanctions ... sanctions ...

                  These are your conspiracy theories again. That, without Navalny "West" would not have found a reason for sanctions?

                  Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                  Maybe you are right. It's not time to leave yet .. can still serve as some kind of "Magnitsky".

                  By the way, yes. Some bastards stole 5,4 billion rubles from the budget, froze the auditor to death, but for some reason you have a negative attitude towards auditor Magnitsky. Why is that?
                  1. Dear sofa expert. 6 February 2021 09: 47
                    +3
                    Many of Putin's friends have become billionaires, it doesn't have to be that way.

                    It is with such a presentation, similar moments, with a deliberate distortion of the cause-and-effect relationship, and the "liberalistic" lies begins.

                    Please give specific names of the most famous of them (people who became billionaires thanks to “friendship with Putin), and below, please, in chronological order: when and how these people became billionaires, and compare them with the dates. when they became "friends" of Putin.

                    For example: the Rotenberg brothers organized their own bank, with hundreds of branches in 40 cities of Russia, back in 2001, when Putin, if he wanted, could not help them with anything.
                    And before that, (in the 90s) the Rotenbergs made money by organizing a security company and having a chain of gas stations.

                    Rotenberg became a "friend of Putin" already being a billionaire. It should not be? Then how should it be?

                    Capitalism has been in the country for 30 years, if that. It just so happened, but under capitalism - a billionaire, this is not a dirty word.

                    When you give your specific examples of the following "friends of Putin", try to continue to bypass the "conspiracy theory" that you so dislike (according to your words, but not your actions).
                  2. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 8 February 2021 01: 56
                    -3
                    Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                    For example: the Rotenberg brothers organized their own bank, with hundreds of branches in 40 cities of Russia, back in 2001, when Putin, if he wanted, could not help them with anything.
                    And before that, (in the 90s) the Rotenbergs made money by organizing a security company and having a chain of gas stations.

                    Rotenberg became a "friend of Putin" already being a billionaire. It should not be? Then how should it be?

                    The Rotenberg brothers met Putin in the judo section of Anatoly Solomonovich Rakhlin in 1964. Then they were definitely not billionaires. Arkady Rotenberg entered the Forbes list with his first billion in 2012.
                    This is still curious
                    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/05/29/putins-shadow-cabinet-and-the-bridge-to-crimea
                    Putin appointed Rotenberg as the head of Rosspirtprom in 2000.
                    Now the Rotenbergs are the richest clan in the Russian Federation https://www.rbc.ru/business/25/08/2020/5f44a64d9a79472e282f154e
                    They earned their wealth on government orders.

                    Kovalchuk Yuri Valentinovich met Putin in the early 90s. Co-founder of the famous Ozero cooperative, was the chairman of the board of directors of Bank Rossiya, entered the Forbes list in 2011

                    Nikolai Shamalov is a semi-billionaire, co-founder of the Ozero cooperative, co-owner of the Rossiya bank.

                    His son Kirill Shamalov became a billionaire in 2016 when he was 34 years old. He ceased to be a billionaire in 2019. The rise of a businessman's career is associated with his marriage to Yekaterina Tikhonov, and the fall with a divorce with her.

                    Gennady Timchenko, in 14, claimed that he had known Putin for more than 20 years, and together they organized the Yavara-Neva judo club.

                    Litvinenko, Vladimir Stefanovich, semi-billionaire, rector of the Mining Institute, head of his campaign headquarters, at his institute, Putin defended his candidate.

                    Dmitry Gorelov, semi-billionaire, has known Putin since 91, co-owner of Rossiya Bank

                    Do you have many acquaintances from childhood or working together 20-30 years ago who became dollar billionaires? At least millionaires?
                    Of course, there is logic here, when you come to power, it is quite logical to replace the billionaires you owe (for example, Berezovsky) with billionaires who owe you. But this is corruption.
                    We can also talk about all the Tokarevs, Chemezovs, Sechenykhs, Millirs, Warnigs, etc.
                  3. Dear sofa expert. 8 February 2021 10: 52
                    +3
                    The Rotenberg brothers met Putin in the judo section of Anatoly Solomonovich Rakhlin in 1964. Then they were definitely not billionaires.

                    So what???

                    The fact that they knew each other from childhood does not at all indicate that the Rotenbergs became billionaires thanks to Putin.
                    For me it is more logical that it was Putin who, having assumed the post of head of the country, surrounded himself with trusted people, including childhood friends. It is a normal world practice (and in politics too) to surround yourself with people whom you personally trust.
                    But the "Rotenbergs", in turn, did not remain in debt to Putin, and gave him good support, which he still receives today.

                    I repeat once again: what you call political corruption is a normal world practice,
                    whether you like it or not. You are aware of the policy objectives:
                    - get power
                    - hold on to power
                    - exercise power
                    So, in the West there is not a single, more or less, self-respecting politician who would not use his power, and his power, in turn, was not used by others.
                    It's just there, it's quite legalized.
                    Have you ever thought about the fact that in developed Western countries, ministerial posts are "distributed" not by "professional correspondence", but stupidly, according to the quota received for each party affiliation that is in the government. As a rule, the ruling party gets the posts of key directions, the rest are distributed according to the percentage composition, if there are several parties. But already there, along the internal party lines, people are selected who have a sufficient number of "personal connections." Personal ties, in turn, are the direct involvement of politicians in the economic and industrial sectors, through their introduction by direct members, for example, on the boards of directors, of these, as a rule, large, budget-forming enterprises. etc.
                    (This is too big a topic to cover here in a nutshell.)

                    But “to everyone else,” these same countries, are trying to put up “labels”, and, moreover, through such gorlopanov as you and your Navalny, “to carry this nonsense to the people”.
                    You, like stupid watchdogs, it is not clear why, do the will of the "west".
                    And the goal of the “west” is to convey to “everyone else” a simple idea:

                    "You do not do as I do, but as I say."

                    Do you have many acquaintances from childhood or working together 20-30 years ago who became dollar billionaires?

                    This does not apply to the topic, but, yes, I have acquaintances and even classmates who more or less meet your criteria.
                  4. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 9 February 2021 01: 10
                    -1
                    Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                    The fact that they knew each other from childhood does not at all indicate that the Rotenbergs became billionaires thanks to Putin.
                    For me it is more logical that it was Putin who, having assumed the post of head of the country, surrounded himself with trusted people, including childhood friends. It is a normal world practice (and in politics too) to surround yourself with people whom you personally trust.

                    When you have trusted people on your team, it makes sense. When your trusted businessmen (friends of childhood and youth) receive billions of dollars in government contracts, this is corruption.

                    Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                    The objectives of the policy are known to you:
                    - get power
                    - hold on to power
                    - exercise power

                    Yes, probably. But preferably within the framework of law and decency. Many billions of dollars in government contracts for friends is at least not decent.

                    Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                    Have you ever thought about the fact that in developed Western countries, ministerial posts are "distributed" not at all by "professional correspondence", but stupidly, according to the quota received for each party affiliation that is part of the government.

                    I don't even grasp the essence of your comparison. A minister is a political position and what have billionaire friends got to do with it? What is common between the distribution of cabinet portfolios by parliamentary parties and the distribution of government contracts by an authoritarian leader among businessmen he knows?

                    Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                    But “to everyone else,” these same countries, are trying to put up “labels”, and, moreover, through such gorlopanov as you and your Navalny, “to carry this nonsense to the people”.
                    You, like stupid watchdogs, it is not clear why, do the will of the "west".
                    And the goal of the “west” is to convey to “everyone else” a simple idea:

                    "You do not do as I do, but as I say."

                    Are you carried away again? For you, probably the ideal is North Korea, there is unity of opinion and everyone agrees with the general line, sometimes there is nothing to eat, but they rallied around the great helmsman. Do you want like in North Korea? Do you think that if you lick well here, it will be credited to you? Or will something change?

                    Quote: Dear sofa expert.
                    This does not apply to the topic, but, yes, I have acquaintances and even classmates who more or less meet your criteria.

                    Dollar billionaires? Hard to believe. I live in St. Petersburg, where more dollar billionaires started than anywhere else, I have not met more than one, especially among my classmates.
                  5. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2021 02: 16
                    +2
                    ... Many billion dollar government contracts are at least not decent for friends ...
                    I don't even grasp the essence of your comparison. A minister is a political position and what have billionaire friends got to do with it? What is common between the distribution of cabinet portfolios by parliamentary parties and the distribution of government contracts by an authoritarian leader among businessmen he knows?

                    Well, you don't catch it in vain.
                    As I say, ministers often have personal connections with industrialists, and sometimes (and as a rule) hold high positions (more often - advisers) at the board of directors of large enterprises, which makes it possible for enterprises to receive advantages at national and international tenders.
                    Example: 1998. Germany. The Volkswagen concern is launching the production of the VW Golf Cabrio (MK IV) for a pan-European tender. In all respects, the tender was won by the subsidiary Skoda (Czech Republic), but as a result of the “political decision” of the then Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the State of Lower Saxony, and the future Chancellor of Germany, Gerhard Schroeder, the production right was given to the “Lower Saxon” company Wilhelm Karmann GmbH (Osnabrück ).

                    This also applies to "multi-billion dollar contracts" to friends ".

                    By the way, other German companies also took part in the tender, but they were no more lucky than the Czechs.)

                    I don’t know if Schroeder was a partner of Karmann in judo)), but he was definitely listed as some kind of “advisor” there (and not only there).
                    By the way, he still provides his services as an "advisor" at "very significant" enterprises. I think there is no need to name them?
                  6. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 10 February 2021 11: 58
                    -1
                    It is illegal for us to combine government duties with commercial activities, I doubt that there is such a thing in Germany.
                    You gave an example of some kind of reverse corruption. A commercial organization under pressure from politics placed an order not where it was more profitable, but where it was more profitable for politics. What is corruption?
                  7. Dear sofa expert. 10 February 2021 14: 37
                    +2
                    It is illegal for us to combine government duties with commercial activities, I doubt that there is such a thing in Germany.

                    So that's exactly what I'm talking about. What is “corruption” in Russia has long been legalized in the West, therefore the impression is created of “corrupt Russia, against the background of a“ clean ”West.

                    Germany:
                    It is not prohibited by law to combine government positions with commercial activities. There are a couple of paragraphs governing this "combination":

                    Für Mitglieder der Bundesregierung und für Beamte gilt nach § 6 des Bundesministergesetzes bzw. § 39 des Beamtenrechtsrahmengesetzes eine Verschwiegenheitspflicht über im Amt bekannt gewordene Angelegenheiten.

                    https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wechsel_zwischen_Politik_und_Wirtschaft

                    formal compliance with which allows you to combine these two "directions"

                    You gave an example of some kind of reverse corruption. A commercial organization under pressure from politics placed an order not where it was more profitable, but where it was more profitable for politics. What is corruption?

                    So I don’t consider it corruption.
                    Schroeder, then, at the post of Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Land of Lower Saxony, despite one of the achievements of Western ideology: "freedom of competition", left as his "personal decision" the production of the Golf Cabrio in "his" land of Lower Saxony, ensuring:

                    a) Multibillion-dollar profits for the Karmann plant in Lower Saxony.
                    b) "worked out" the "advisor's" own salary?) (in Russian it would be called - kickback)
                    b) He left production inside his own land, which promoted himself-beloved in the election campaign for the post of Bundeskanzler (the electorate of Lower Saxony played a decisive role in those elections).

                    It is not enough to call him, by Russian standards, a corrupt official?

                    Now a question for you:

                    What is corruption in your opinion, when Putin instructed his proxies (let's call them "Rotenberg" if you like), the construction of a strategically and politically extremely important facility - the Crimean Bridge?
              2. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2021 02: 17
                +2
                Are you carried away again? For you, probably the ideal is North Korea, there is unity of opinion

                So it "carries you", dear.)
                I just won't be hysterical about "corruption", like you, with your Navalny.)
                On the contrary, I say that this has long been the norm throughout the world. Only people like you are trying to suggest that you do not deserve this norm. And you, in turn, bring this confusion "to your home."
                After all, you do not even fully understand the meaning of the term "corruption".
                You only see that someone, somewhere, has managed to earn more than you. And that's all - this is a corrupt official!)
                But think about the very definition of this word:

                corruption is giving a bribe, accepting a bribe, abuse of power, commercial bribery or other illegal use by an individual of his official position contrary to the legitimate interests of society and the state in order to obtain benefits in the form of money,

                https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Коррупция_в_России

                Key words: .... contrary to the legitimate interests of society and the state ...!

                Tell me, what interests of society and the state suffer from the friendship between Putin and the "Rotenbergs"?

                What?
              3. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2021 02: 24
                +2
                Dollar billionaires? Hard to believe. I live in St. Petersburg, where more dollar billionaires started than anywhere else, I have not met more than one, especially among my classmates.

                I sincerely sympathize with you.)

                Faith is your own business, it makes me neither cold nor hot. Maybe it will upset you, but I even have such acquaintances in your St. Petersburg.

                By the way, really, I sympathize ... already because you, the mere fact of this, already "worries" (worries).
                For example, I wouldn't care if you also had such friends, or classmates.
                I don't even care that I have them.)
                I live my life, I try not to depend on anyone, I do not envy anyone, I don’t need anyone’s help.
                Which I sincerely wish you too.)
  • Cherry Offline Cherry
    Cherry (Kuzmina Tatyana) 2 February 2021 12: 56
    +1
    Where can you read Navalny's presidential election program?
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 2 February 2021 17: 33
      -7
      Have you been banned in Google?
      https://2018.navalny.com/platform/
      1. Cherry Offline Cherry
        Cherry (Kuzmina Tatyana) 3 February 2021 15: 02
        +2
        Slogans are not a program.
        This, for example, what?!? -

        We must end all wars, explicit and implicit. We do not need them, they lead to losses of our citizens, they are expensive, they make us poor.

        - where and what wars is Russia waging?!?
        1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
          Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 3 February 2021 15: 56
          -7
          You ask me as if I were Navalny's press secretary.
          In Siri, like three times already celebrated the victory, our citizens are dying and billions are spent.
          1. Cherry Offline Cherry
            Cherry (Kuzmina Tatyana) 3 February 2021 17: 39
            +1
            Don't you think that the army should somehow feel what it is for?
            1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
              Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 3 February 2021 17: 48
              -6
              Are you ready to send your son to Syria, what would the "army feel for what it is for"? With not zero probability of return in zinc packaging in the worst case, but with guaranteed mental problems. I'm not mine. After Afgan, my cousin never got out of the tailspin. So no, it doesn't seem.
              PS I understand that there are no more questions about what kind of wars Russia is waging.
              1. Cherry Offline Cherry
                Cherry (Kuzmina Tatyana) 4 February 2021 07: 14
                +1
                If a person has chosen the profession of a military man, then he is ready to perform any tasks. And the comparison with Afghanistan is incorrect, because. there, in contrast to Syria, where contract soldiers serve, conscripts fought.
                1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                  Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 4 February 2021 13: 11
                  -4
                  Are you ready to send your son? Conscripts were sent to Georgia. Actually, the question is not that, what kind of wars is the Russian Federation waging, have we decided?
                  1. Cherry Offline Cherry
                    Cherry (Kuzmina Tatyana) 4 February 2021 15: 13
                    +1
                    Russia does not wage any wars, and in order to fall behind, I have neither a son nor a grandson. And if they did and chose the military profession, this is their choice. It would only be necessary to accept it.
                  2. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 4 February 2021 23: 09
                    -5
                    Too bad not. And what is the name of what is happening in Syria, where our servicemen are killing locals and locals (and not only) are killing our servicemen?
                  3. Cherry Offline Cherry
                    Cherry (Kuzmina Tatyana) 5 February 2021 15: 07
                    +1
                    Once again, for those who are not particularly gifted - in Syria and elsewhere, DIRECTIVES DO NOT SERVE. And if I had a son and a grandson in the military, then I would only be proud of them, like my grandfather and uncles.
                  4. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 6 February 2021 09: 26
                    -3
                    Once again, for those who do not get it right the first time, I will repeat the question. What is the name of what is happening in Syria, where our servicemen are killing locals and locals (and not only) are killing our servicemen? What does your non-existent sons and conscripts have to do with it?
        2. 1Maks Offline 1Maks
          1Maks (Max) 4 February 2021 08: 21
          +2
          For your information, serving in Syria is not easy to get. So we also have patriots. For example, I wrote a report 2 times to get into the DRA, and served there.
          1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
            Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 4 February 2021 13: 14
            -5
            And you see the meaning in the death of thousands of young people, Soviet citizens in the DRA? I wonder which one? As in Syria, what's the point?
  • Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
    Volkonsky (Wolf) 1 February 2021 19: 00
    +4
    room for dirt - didn't you bother? Biden is a corrupt official, a proven fact, this did not stop him from taking a chair in the White House
  • igor.igorev Offline igor.igorev
    igor.igorev (Igor) 6 February 2021 21: 13
    0
    They fight the scum as a violator of the laws of the Russian Federation. What kind of politician is he?
  • amateur Offline amateur
    amateur (Victor) 1 February 2021 08: 53
    +7
    There was already one "fighter against corruption" in Russia who received money for this from the enemy (the Germans). And his name was V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin). This "struggle" ended in civil war, devastation and famine. And it could have ended with the disintegration of the country, if a certain "satrap" JV Stalin had not come to power.
    So maybe it will be enough to stage experiments over Russia "to combat corruption" for bourgeois money?
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 1 February 2021 09: 53
      -9
      Well, what are you, Stalin in those years held the modest post of Secretary of the Central Committee. Trotsky gathered the country with an iron hand under the leadership of the same Lenin.
      1. amateur Offline amateur
        amateur (Victor) 1 February 2021 10: 12
        +7
        Trotsky gathered the country with an iron hand under the leadership of the same Lenin.

        Is that why there are still more monuments to Lenin in the "national team" of Finland than in the USSR? Poland, the Baltic states are also collected? Well, the "cherry on the cake" is Mount Ararat, which the "gatherers" gave to Turkey along with the Kars fortress.
        1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
          Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 1 February 2021 14: 32
          -7
          I want to remind you that although Stalin was not in the first roles in the revolution, he was not in the latter either. So his share of "guilt" in the collapse of the country is also there. And many even then pointed to Stalin's involvement in the so-called "miracle on the Vistula".
          And secondly, the annexed by Lenin and Trotsky is an order of magnitude (or orders of magnitude) larger than the annexed by Stalin. With Finland, Stalin also went wrong.
          1. amateur Offline amateur
            amateur (Victor) 1 February 2021 14: 42
            +3
            And secondly, an order of magnitude (or orders of magnitude) added by Lenin and Trotsky

            Announce what exactly they have joined, if it doesn't bother you.
            1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
              Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 1 February 2021 16: 03
              -9
              Ukraine, Belarus, Transcaucasia, Central Asia, the Urals, Siberia in the end. The Russian Soviet Republic ended on the Volga. Stalin usurped power by the end of the 20s, when most of the territories had already been returned.
              1. amateur Offline amateur
                amateur (Victor) 1 February 2021 16: 41
                +4
                Siberia in the end

                The wealth of Russia will grow with Siberia - words of the Russian scientist Mikhail Vasilyevich Lomonosov (1711 - 1765)

                Bravo! Thanks to you Leiba Bronstein (L.D. Trotsky) was able to fulfill the plans of M.V. Lomonosov. Yes, and to the tsarist generals Kaufman and Chernyaev from Central Asia, you wiped your nose. fool
                1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                  Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 1 February 2021 18: 58
                  -7
                  Aah ... That is, thanks to you, Dzhugashvili (Stalin) wiped his nose to Peter the Great and Rodion Khristianovich Baur with Tallinn and Boris Petrovich Sheremetev with Riga?
                  1. amateur Offline amateur
                    amateur (Victor) 1 February 2021 19: 22
                    +2
                    Talking with a fool, you won’t get rid of shame,
                    Therefore, the advice you listen to Khayyam:
                    The poison offered to you by the sage, accept
                    From the hands of a fool do not take balm.


                    (O. Khayyam)
                    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 1 February 2021 19: 33
                      -6
                      People usually run over to such techniques, like your quote, not from a big mind. This usually means that they have nothing to say stupidly.
  • Nenashev Yuri Offline Nenashev Yuri
    Nenashev Yuri (Nenashev Yuri) 1 February 2021 09: 16
    -6
    If the state does not want to humanly communicate with society and tell the truth, then we learn the "truth" from the bulk.
  • Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 1 February 2021 11: 11
    0
    Ha. Either the Unnamed "is of no interest to anyone", then 2 articles a day.
    And money is "found" from N on a quarterly basis. Then they really forget what they found and are finding again. Already others. Etc....

    By the way, ___ doesn't catch mice at all? Some Sanya from Florida ("not an opponent of Navalny, not a supporter of Putin, a US citizen") - "he discovered a bitcoin wallet himself, and he unwound everything himself"

    Maybe he should be invited as a deputy to Lyubyanka?
  • Dmitry S. Offline Dmitry S.
    Dmitry S. (Dmitry Sanin) 1 February 2021 11: 45
    +6
    When the people understand that Lyosha is not ideological - he works as an oppositionist, he is well paid for it. And it is not he who makes videos - he simply puts them out for money and gets money again. While there are links to Navalny, there is also Navalny. He's a by-product of the media space, a toxic product.
  • Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 1 February 2021 12: 34
    +4
    Quote: Oleg Rambover
    If not Navalny, then who? Seriously, why not a politician? He has his own voters, as shown by the Moscow elections, he strives to gain power. In my opinion, we have a few politicians in the Russian Federation. And literally. Who else is a politician? Putin. And that's all.

    He can strive for anything, this will not make him a politician, he is a function of protest actions and support from abroad. The personality of the wrong hummingbird. Even our media, which in the subject more often present him as a criticism of Putin, and not as an opposition leader.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 1 February 2021 19: 19
      -4
      What does the wrong caliber mean, especially the personality? Yashin a politician? Yes, I think so. Like his caliber. Any politician is a function of some groups, whose interests he represents, how are protest-minded citizens worse than other groups? Who is a politician in Russia in general, besides Putin?
  • Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 1 February 2021 12: 49
    0
    Oh, you don't believe Putin's tales about the paid agent Lesha Navalny? Well, then Sanya from Florida is coming to you! He tracked only one payment to our hero's bitcoin wallet.

    1. And if we believe? What does it change? Personally, I am not very interested in Navalny's personality; I am interested in the degree of reliability of the information merged through him. She seems to be tall. If Navalny makes money at the same time, why not? When he is really caught in a serious lie and falsification, his income will fall, and accordingly he will monitor his reputation. Politics is still business, not charity, we have long been afraid of idealists more than businessmen. Or is only Putin's supporters allowed to make money, while critics are not?
    2. But Sana from Florida, I will believe it ...
    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Wolf) 1 February 2021 19: 07
      +1
      if you don’t believe it, go to the FBK website yourself, go down to "Provide help" and go to the BTS wallet, all infa is open
      1. Alenta Offline Alenta
        Alenta (Asya Yasina) 7 February 2021 01: 42
        -2
        So what ? What does this prove? Absolutely nothing! Americans donate to the election campaign, but this does not mean that someone bought or sold out. For example, a player bet on Navalny, a million dollars is not money for him, he wanted to - he bet.
        1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
          Volkonsky (Wolf) 7 February 2021 04: 22
          +1
          madam, what do you know about election campaigns in the USA? those who donate money for them, then present the bill to the elected presidents, and they work it off! and your Lech will work, at your own expense! do not believe me - look at Ukraine, which is already paying with land and greyhound puppies (in the sense of labor resources), and soon it will reach human organs (the law is already in the Rada!)
  • Fss Offline Fss
    Fss (Fss) 1 February 2021 16: 24
    -5
    Another accuser: if you are such a righteous person, dare to describe how those close to the body are enriched. And so - just contempt.
  • Zloy meh Offline Zloy meh
    Zloy meh (Zloy Meh) 1 February 2021 16: 31
    -5
    How can there be such monsters as the CIA, FBI, FSB. But "Sanya from Florida" is yeah, "METER INTELLIGENCE". I readily believe "Sana from Florida".
    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Wolf) 1 February 2021 19: 10
      +1
      and you, dear, go to the FBK website yourself, go down to the "Help" section and go to the BTS wallet, all info is open.
  • Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 1 February 2021 19: 35
    -1
    Quote: Volkonsky
    if you don’t believe it, go to the FBK website yourself, go down to "Provide help" and go to the BTS wallet, all infa is open

    What for? I don't care about the presence of wallets and money in them.
    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Wolf) 1 February 2021 19: 41
      0
      2. But Sana from Florida, I will believe it ...

      then your accusations of lying are not clear, do you have bipolar disorder?
  • Peter rybak Offline Peter rybak
    Peter rybak (Patrol) 1 February 2021 21: 49
    -2
    Do you know a lot of people who receive (I cannot say earn) 100 thousand US dollars a day?

    Yes, the entire top of our government, all those close to us, everyone who more or less have access to budget funds, everyone who got the raw materials wealth of our country.
  • Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 2 February 2021 08: 24
    -1
    Quote: Volkonsky
    2. But Sana from Florida, I will believe it ...

    then your accusations of lying are not clear, do you have bipolar disorder?

    What are you talking about? Did I blame Sanya somewhere? Are you dyslexic?
    1. Volkonsky Offline Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Wolf) 2 February 2021 17: 47
      0
      read carefully again -

      2. But Sana from Florida, I will believe it ...

      What follows from this statement? distrust of what was said! what does it mean - an accusation of lying!
      Those. your left hemisphere believes Sana, but your right does not?
      Allegations of dyslexia are no longer for me, the psychiatrist on the floor above
  • Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 2 February 2021 18: 53
    -1
    Quote: Volkonsky
    we read carefully again - 2. But I will wait to believe Sanya from Florida ...
    What follows from this statement? distrust of what was said! what does it mean - an accusation of lying!
    Those. your left hemisphere believes Sana, but your right does not?
    Allegations of dyslexia are no longer for me, the psychiatrist on the floor above

    No, you shouldn't! In the first paragraph, I write that I believe in Putin's fairy tales. In the second, that I'll wait to believe Sana.
    What is the contradiction? I have written many times that I think Navalny is a dubious person and that he is not of interest to me (I am only interested in the leaked information). If Navalny himself is not interested, then the information about his accounts (which does not affect the subject of my interest) will wait / don’t believe. That's when it gets interested - I'll check if it's worth believing, but for now I'll wait.
    Wait - postpone the beginning of an action, not negation (this is in case you still do not know the meaning of the word)
  • Alenta Offline Alenta
    Alenta (Asya Yasina) 7 February 2021 01: 16
    -2
    Enough to invent, it's a pity to look at you, wriggle like snakes in a hot frying pan.
    The video hangs, even a stupid one understands, because it has been watched many times, because Putin himself is fueling interest in this film, with his ridiculous excuses, crooked justice, and dispersal of rallies.
    Recently only this topic has been discussed.
    Plus, the old authors of old investigations flared up, one after another, like mushrooms after a rain, fell down with the old revelations of Putin. And Navalny in this general exposure served as a trigger and starting point for the sinking of Putin.
    Everything! Now no propaganda will save Putin's rotten reputation, no matter how hard you try!
  • Alenta Offline Alenta
    Alenta (Asya Yasina) 7 February 2021 01: 28
    -1
    Your Sasha is not looking well, 2 billion rubles have been received on the bitcoin wallet, for a large network this is very little. Why don't you count their fines, 40 million each?
  • The comment was deleted.