"Russia will be beyond competition" - Chinese media about the upcoming MiG-41


Today, the Russian high-altitude all-weather long-range fighter-interceptors MiG-31 are the fastest in the world. But in Russia, an even more advanced aircraft is being developed to replace it under the symbol MiG-41, writes the Chinese online publication Sina.


The project to develop a new generation interceptor started in 2019. On January 24, 2021, Rostec State Corporation announced details. It turned out that the project of a promising long-range intercept aircraft complex (PAK DP) is at the stage of development work (ROC), which should end with the creation of a prototype.

According to analysts, the Russian MiG-41 will be a sixth generation stealth aircraft. According to its characteristics, it will surpass all fighters in service with other states.

Russia will be out of competition

- they are sure.

The Interceptor is a unique branch of the fighter family. Their main goal is to intercept enemy strategic bombers before they strike. Now only the Russian Federation is armed with this type of aircraft. Moscow is stubbornly improving existing machines and developing a new one. In other countries, interceptors have been removed from service, replacing them with multi-role fighters.

The MiG-31 is the only dedicated interceptor in the world. He replaced the MiG-25. It can fly at supersonic speeds of 2500 km / h (Mach 2,35). The maximum take-off weight is almost 47 tons.

One MiG-31 can intercept three American "strategists" B-52, B-1B or B-2. However, the AGM-183A hypersonic air-to-surface missile is already being tested in the United States. When it is put into service, the Americans will be able to strike at Russia without entering the MiG-31's zone of operation. Therefore, the Russian Federation is developing the MiG-41.

It is assumed that the MiG-41 will be armed with a new ultra-long-range air-to-air missile and will be able to detect targets at a distance of over 500 km. The interceptor can be made in two versions: manned and unmanned. For Moscow, the presence of interceptors is of strategic importance due to the country's gigantic territory. It is because of the unique geographical features of Russia that such aircraft are needed. Probably, the MiG-41 will enter service with the Russian Aerospace Forces until 2040, the media from China summed up.
  • Photos used: Leukhin Fedor / https: //www.flickr.com
Ad
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 27 January 2021 11: 08
    +2
    and not tired? Chinese experts are such experts ...
    the aircraft has just begun to be developed, but it is already extremely possible ... from the Chinese, who have almost stopped buying our aircraft and engines ...
  2. stepet Offline stepet
    stepet 27 January 2021 11: 38
    -7
    Russia will be out of competition "- Chinese media about the upcoming MiG-41

    Only in the media and out of competition.
    There are almost no world-class products in Russia.
    This concerns the products of the military-industrial complex no less than the products of other industries.
    1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
      Bulanov (Vladimir) 27 January 2021 13: 12
      +5
      That is why Russian Kamaz trucks have been taking first places in the Dakar for several years in a row?
      1. stepet Offline stepet
        stepet 27 January 2021 15: 02
        -8
        Quote: Bulanov
        That is why Russian Kamaz trucks have been taking first places in the Dakar for several years in a row?

        So what?
        Does this make KAMAZ a world-class product?
        Is there a queue for them?
      2. Alexander K_2 Offline Alexander K_2
        Alexander K_2 (Alexander K) 27 January 2021 18: 10
        -1
        And what is there from KAMAZ, if only a badge!
    2. Morgan Offline Morgan
      Morgan (Miron) 27 January 2021 22: 57
      -2
      there are almost no world-class products

      - from the word "absolutely"
  3. Binder Offline Binder
    Binder (Miron) 27 January 2021 14: 59
    -4
    I dared specifically - in Russia for two decades they did not manage to blind a fifth-generation fighter, and then they swung at the sixth. The circus!!!
    1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
      Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 16: 40
      +2
      ... I dared specifically - in Russia for two decades they did not manage to blind a fifth-generation fighter, and then they swung at the sixth. The circus!!!

      Miracle, before speaking, ask how many Americans sawed their f22 in time, I'll tell you a secret, it was also about 20 years old, the first serial su57 is already in the army, we will create both the 5th and 6th generation, with our own forces, but you have there are no planes of our own at all, you fly only on what the Americans will allow and put you on, so don't be gundi, you are not in that position.
      1. Alexander K_2 Offline Alexander K_2
        Alexander K_2 (Alexander K) 27 January 2021 18: 13
        -2
        Russia and old military weapons are unable to maintain
        1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
          Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 18: 25
          +2
          .Russia and old military weapons are unable to maintain

          And why should the old weapons be kept, they are in warehouses, while the new is constantly participating in regular exercises and is being tested in Syria
          1. Alexander K_2 Offline Alexander K_2
            Alexander K_2 (Alexander K) 27 January 2021 18: 30
            -1
            Well, if in this context, I'm embarrassed to ask, how is there enough for everything, or are the Armata immediately towed to the exercises from the parade on Red Square, and then pulled to Syria?
            1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
              Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 18: 36
              0
              The issue with "Armata" has nothing to do with financing, the tank is being finalized and improved, including in Syria
              1. Alexander K_2 Offline Alexander K_2
                Alexander K_2 (Alexander K) 27 January 2021 18: 38
                -1
                Well, yes, but by the way, there is enough in Russia without the `` Armata '' that it will take another 100 years to finish and improve
                1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                  Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 18: 51
                  0
                  Well, this is natural, all armies are striving for this, something to modify and improve
        2. Mantrid Machina Offline Mantrid Machina
          Mantrid Machina (Mantrid Machina) 28 January 2021 00: 16
          +2
          the old does not contain, but is modernized to bring it to an acceptable level today. The groundwork was made concrete.
      2. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 27 January 2021 20: 14
        -2
        Oh incomparable beacon of wisdom, take into account that the F-22 has been in operation since 2005, the F-35 successfully performs combat missions and is adopted for service in many, far from the most unfortunate countries, and even the Indians turn up their nose from your Su-57. And you can puff up as much as you like, but Russia's lag behind the West will only grow further. You will continue to tell each other about what wonderful, unparalleled in the world, rockets, planes, tanks and other types of weapons you will ever create, you will watch cartoons with delight and consider yourself the coolest peppers in the garden. lol
        1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
          Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 20: 56
          0
          How patriotic it must be to praise a foreign plane laughing

          F-22 in service since 2005

          The first requirements for the aircraft were formulated as early as 1981, or was it designed in one day and flew the next day?
          F35, whose program cost 1.5 trillion. dollars and which has 111 defects of only the first category of complexity, not counting the rest, the stealth coating peeling off at high speeds, but this is truly the achievement of the coolest peppers in the garden laughing but I understand you, there is no choice that they gave on that and you have to fly, and even praise at the same time. laughing

          even the Indians turn up their nose from your Su-57

          The Indians do not want to do anything, they want to get a finished modified aircraft with all the technologies, they are still gypsies. By the way, your unsurpassed F35, they are in no hurry to buy something

          Russia's lag behind the West will only grow further.

          sounds like a spell laughing ... but you ... the main thing is to buy more f35,
          1. Binder Offline Binder
            Binder (Miron) 27 January 2021 21: 01
            -1
            Quote: Stanislav Bykov
            The Indians do not want to do anything, they want to get a finished, modified aircraft with all the technologies, they are still gypsies

            They simply do not want your Su-57 because its performance characteristics do not suit them - they openly talk about this.

            Quote: Stanislav Bykov
            . main f35 buy more

            Don't worry about us - we will decide what and how much.
            1. Mantrid Machina Offline Mantrid Machina
              Mantrid Machina (Mantrid Machina) 28 January 2021 00: 21
              +2
              Friend, you are not in line with the word at all! yes no now just oh how they want! even demanded to bring the Su-57 to their airshow to show it as the highlight of the program, but they had to bite out the fig because they would only show them the model of the Su-57E. And they should not have to clap their ears and hurry up with the development of RC kit kits for model aircraft, otherwise the Chinese with Aliexpress will quickly master this niche lol
              1. Binder Offline Binder
                Binder (Miron) 28 January 2021 01: 34
                -3
                about what the Indians want, they themselves told you in the hairdresser? laughing
        2. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
          Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 02: 59
          0
          The Pentagon admitted that only a third of the fifth generation F-35 Lightning fighters are ready for real combat operations. Hundreds of planes have already left the assembly line, but all of them still suffer from "childhood sores". Moreover, the list of "ailments" is expanding. Experts believe that on paper, the United States has produced a really high-quality aviation complex, but in practice something went wrong.
          1. Binder Offline Binder
            Binder (Miron) 28 January 2021 05: 49
            -2
            Is this a quote from the newspaper "Putin's Dawns", published in the regional center Gadyukino? lol
      3. alex5450 Online alex5450
        alex5450 (Alex L) 28 January 2021 18: 04
        0
        What's the secret? In 1990, a demonstrator flew. In 1997 a prototype. Serial production began in 2001, and in 2004 the aircraft reached combat readiness. In 2006, the first combat unit was completely re-equipped with this type of aircraft, and in 2011, production was completed, having produced "everything" (then it was fashionable to write in Runet - "the aircraft would be produced in a small batch of 187 machines.")

        For 11 years now, prototypes and pre-production (actually, not by name) cars have been flying and falling,
        1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
          Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 18: 23
          0
          Well, you see, from the moment the demonstrator flew to the first rearmed unit, 16 years, the period is not short

          We have been flying and falling prototypes and pre-production

          Only one fell, which is absolutely not critical, but what do they fly, so let them fly and be brought up, or do Americans need to stamp a bunch of raw production aircraft, proclaim them the best and then suffer?
          1. alex5450 Online alex5450
            alex5450 (Alex L) 28 January 2021 19: 02
            -2
            I can see the difference between a production car and a pre-production car that is hardly pushed into the troops.
            One fell, the other burned down. And this is on the cut 6-8 thousand plaque.

            The Americans do not just churn out modern machines, which acquire more and more combat capabilities with every step. And everyone has childhood illnesses. At the same time, the F-35 flies on a standard engine with combat pilots. And flew hundreds of thousands of hours. With a scanty accident rate.
            1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
              Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 19: 26
              0
              F35 is more of a commercial project than a real combat unit, and not everything is as rosy with them as you describe, here, at your leisure, if it is interesting:

              https://vpk.name/news/481194
              _plany_sorvany_pochemu_noveishie_istrebiteli_ssha_ne_godyatsya_dlya_voiny.html
              1. alex5450 Online alex5450
                alex5450 (Alex L) 28 January 2021 19: 51
                -2
                For all the ultra-transparency of the F-35 program (in fact, every step of the program is known, from the number of problems to the percentage of combat readiness), there are not so many parameters that we can assess outside of the "lobbyist assaults" (the negative of which are cited with relish by all sorts of RIA), carried out consistently by opponents then the supporters of this program (when such money is spinning, it is not surprising that there are few indifferent).
                But we know something "first-hand" and I mentioned it - accident rate. And it is ultra-low for this project.
                At the same time, there are also enough positive statements, as well as (quiet for Runet) reports on the elimination of regular problems. The car is pumped to the next update, receives and tests new weapons.

                And the complete opposite of this project is the Su-57, which is always doing well, very inexpensively, very efficiently, just like that, if you look at the available data badly.
                1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                  Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 20: 17
                  0
                  ... negative of which with relish are quoted by all sorts of RIA

                  There are already a bunch of articles in the foreign press in which the Su 57 both praise and criticize, why shouldn't we? But we need to look at the facts, and the facts are such that this is the future of our Air Force, the first serial in the army, but slowly, but the road will be mastered by the one walking.
                  1. alex5450 Online alex5450
                    alex5450 (Alex L) 28 January 2021 20: 53
                    0
                    I still want the resource to be an information-analytical one, and not another trench of an information war, that is, an Internet trash heap in which couch soldiers train in throwing manure.

                    It is not known whether the future is our Air Force or not. Too expensive a small car. I would not be surprised (especially in our realities) if it gives way to a more pragmatic model while remaining a kind of analogue of the F-22. As one comrade wrote there in the early 00s, "Our design bureau ached for two of its versions of the car, but the military needs a" Russian raptor "" ...
    2. stepet Offline stepet
      stepet 27 January 2021 17: 22
      -7
      Quote: Bindyuzhnik
      in Russia for two decades they did not manage to blind a fifth-generation fighter, but here they swung at the sixth. The circus!!!

      Which fighter?
      Army pistol (MP) 10 years made, never made.
      Not having mastered the MP, they converted a normal cartridge into a defuterium (7N21) and made a pukalku (ersatz) for it.
      Which was adopted.
      That's it, the task is completed.
      Well, and the fact that instead of an army pistol in service with a fart, who cares?
      All Russian weapons are like that.
      And the Soviets were like that.
      Nothing changed.
      1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
        Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 18: 03
        +1
        Which fighter?
        Army pistol (MP) have been doing for 10 years,

        All Russian weapons are like that, and Soviet ones were.

        This is an opus laughing In fact, Russia is in second place in the world for the export of weapons to other countries, from small arms to radars and air defense systems, which suggests that it is reliable and easy to use, and you mean some kind of pistol wassat
        1. stepet Offline stepet
          stepet 27 January 2021 19: 34
          -5
          Quote: Stanislav Bykov
          In fact, Russia is in second place in the world in the export of weapons to other countries, from small arms to radars and air defense systems, which suggests that it is reliable and easy to use, and you mean some kind of pistol

          That does not say anything at all.
          Russia rarely sells its weapons (ersatz in fact) for money, and if it does, it is very cheap.
          And even more often, she EXCHANGES her weapon for some kind of goods.
          That is, the "secret of success" of the Russian Federation in the arms trade is simple - cheapness and barter.
          It is impossible to buy normal weapons on such conditions in the world. Therefore, poor countries often choose Russian weapons.
          However, the experience of Armenia in Nagorno-Karabakh showed that this is a path to the abyss. Cheap weapons, in the modern world, are not weapons at all.
          1. isofat Offline isofat
            isofat (isofat) 27 January 2021 19: 53
            0
            Quote: stepet
            That does not say anything at all.

            stepet... Russia's second largest arms exporter in the world cannot be ignored. Either we are learning to trade, or the weapon is not bad ... Or maybe both.

            The market will regulate everything! smile
            1. stepet Offline stepet
              stepet 27 January 2021 21: 51
              -7
              Quote: isofat
              Russia's second largest arms exporter in the world cannot be ignored. Either we are learning to trade, or the weapon is not bad ...

              Well, for a start, it's not the second for a long time.
              And why poor countries take Russian weapons, I wrote above.
              At the same time, I'm not sure that barter for illiquid assets (such as palm oil) is trade.
              1. isofat Offline isofat
                isofat (isofat) 27 January 2021 22: 17
                +1
                Quote: stepet
                Well, for a start, it's not the second for a long time.

                We look:

                MOSCOW, January 27 - RIA Novosti. The global arms market in 2019 grew to a record $ 92 billion in the XNUMXst century, according to an analytical report provided on Monday to RIA Novosti by the World Arms Trade Analysis Center (TsAMTO, Russia).

                21: 52 27.01.2020 (updated: 19: 17 03.03.2020)

                Thus, if the arms market has changed, then it is recently. smile

                PS Not sure, don't overtake. He sees the market everything! wink
              2. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 23: 20
                +1
                At the same time, I'm not sure that barter for illiquid assets (such as palm oil) is trade

                There was a rumor that Indonesia wants to buy 11 su35 from the Russian Federation for palm oil, in the end it all ended at the level of rumors. After these rumors, you pretend that the Russian Federation sells weapons for illiquid assets. To whom and when did Russia still sell or tried to sell weapons for illiquid assets ?
                1. stepet Offline stepet
                  stepet 28 January 2021 00: 57
                  -3
                  Quote: Stanislav Bykov
                  After these rumors, you pass off as facts that the Russian Federation sells weapons for illiquid assets. To whom and when did Russia still sell or tried to sell weapons for illiquid assets?

                  Many people.
                  The same Indonesia.
                  Only one deal fell through.
                  And this was not the only deal.
                  1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                    Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 02: 02
                    +1
                    Many people.
                    The same Indonesia.
                    Only one deal fell through.
                    And this was not the only deal.

                    Again, some words, words without any facts, even if you share a link, in general, you are already tired, tell your fables to someone else
                    1. stepet Offline stepet
                      stepet 28 January 2021 11: 14
                      -5
                      at least share a link,

                      Look for the info yourself.
                      I have no desire to share information with you.
                    2. isofat Offline isofat
                      isofat (isofat) 28 January 2021 11: 29
                      0
                      Stanislas, you see, it turns out stepet not pepper at all ... I was blown away, only the smell remained. wink
          2. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
            Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 20: 05
            -2
            Armenia's experience in Nagorno-Karabakh has shown that this is a path to the abyss.

            What kind of experience? Since the defeat in Karabakh, Azerbaijan has been intensively preparing for revenge, while the Armenians hoped that Russia would fight for them in Karabakh, and when this did not happen, they blamed Russian weapons for everything. By the way, Azerbaijan also had Russian weapons and they did not complain.

            It is impossible to buy normal weapons on such conditions in the world.
            Therefore, poor countries often choose Russian weapons.

            Tell us about the "abnormality" of Russian weapons in such "poor" countries as China, India, Turkey,
            1. stepet Offline stepet
              stepet 27 January 2021 21: 58
              -5
              Quote: Stanislav Bykov
              What kind of experience?

              Visual.

              Quote: Stanislav Bykov
              Since its defeat in Karabakh, Azerbaijan has been strenuously preparing for revenge, while the Armenians reckoned that Russia would fight for them in Karabakh if ​​anything

              Nonsense.
              The Armenians prepared in the same way as the Azerbaijanis.
              Only in ABSOLUTELY different ways.
              The experience of Nagorno-Karabakh showed that Azerbaijan's method turned out to be much more correct than the Armenian one.

              Quote: Stanislav Bykov
              By the way, Azerbaijan also had Russian weapons and they did not complain.

              Only auxiliary.
              Azerbaijan's main weapon is not Russian.
              There is simply no good Russian weapon.
              Can not be.
              Not released.

              Quote: Stanislav Bykov
              Tell us about the "abnormality" of Russian weapons in such "poor" countries as China, India, Turkey,

              But why?
              They don't buy Russian weapons.
              Only very poor India takes a little. And even then, every year less and less.
              And if you are talking about a show with the Americans buying the S-400 through Turkey, then it was not the Turks who bought it, but the Americans. For experiments.
              1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 22: 58
                +1
                Only very poor India takes a little

                Yes, of course, under 300 dryers, a tank park of T90, now also s400, a month ago they decided to buy 20 more MiGs, don't write nonsense, India is the main importer of Russian weapons

                And if you are talking about a show with the Americans buying the S-400 through Turkey, then it was not the Turks who bought it, but the Americans. For experiments.

                Aha laughing and sanctions against Turkey from America for the purchase, is it also for experiments?

                Azerbaijan's main weapon is not Russian

                Tanks, helicopters, attack aircraft, small arms, aren't they Russian? Western countries have never sold weapons to Azerbaijan and are not going to sell them, except for Turkish and Israeli UAVs and several Israeli OTRKs, Azerbaijan had nothing.

                .The Armenians prepared in the same way as the Azerbaijanis.
                Only in ABSOLUTELY different ways.

                What is it? Azerbaijan armed itself for petrodollars, conducting regular exercises with the Turks, and how did Armenia prepare?
                1. stepet Offline stepet
                  stepet 28 January 2021 01: 04
                  -5
                  Quote: Stanislav Bykov
                  India is the main importer of Russian weapons

                  India is a poor country with a poor population.
                  That saves.

                  Quote: Stanislav Bykov
                  and sanctions against Turkey from America for the purchase, is it also for experiments?

                  This is for visibility.
                  They do not work anyway, but they will be canceled.

                  Quote: Stanislav Bykov
                  Tanks, helicopters, attack aircraft, small arms, aren't they Russian?

                  Occasionally.

                  Quote: Stanislav Bykov
                  Western countries have never sold weapons to Azerbaijan and are not going to sell them, except for Turkish and Israeli UAVs and several Israeli OTRKs, Azerbaijan had nothing.

                  Azerbaijan, in addition to the latest Western weapons, had the main thing, an officer corps TRAINED in the West.
                  That is, SPECIALISTS of military affairs.
                  And Armenia "taught" its military in Russia.

                  Quote: Stanislav Bykov
                  and how did Armenia prepare?

                  Preparing for friendship.
                  So I prepared.
                  By the way, Armenians live richer than Azerbaijanis.
                  Much richer.
                  Armenians are generally the richest in the post-Soviet space, except for the Balts, which feed in the EU.
                  Oil and gas, that's not all.
                  1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                    Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 01: 51
                    +1
                    Azerbaijan, in addition to the latest Western weapons, had the main thing, an officer corps TRAINED in the West.
                    That is, SPECIALISTS of military affairs.

                    What Western weapons can you name, the officer corps trained in the West, as the experience of Georgia shows, in the case of a naughty heels shines so much that you cannot catch up laughing ,

                    Preparing for friendship.
                    So I prepared.

                    Aha for friendship! with Soros, decided in the end that they did not need Russia, and got what they got ..

                    Armenians are generally the richest in the post-Soviet space,

                    Yeah, only Ukrainians are richer laughing
                    1. stepet Offline stepet
                      stepet 28 January 2021 11: 11
                      -6
                      What Western weapons name at least one,

                      Read the press.
                      I didn't hire you as an informant.

                      the officer corps trained in the West, as the experience of Georgia shows, in the case of a naughty heels shines so that you cannot catch up

                      Where did Georgia get such an officer corps?
                      Do not pass off your fantasies as facts.

                      decided in the end that they did not need Russia,

                      Nobody needs Russia at all.
                      And it never was.
                      And the USSR was never needed by anyone.
                      In addition to all sorts of hicks, he stuck.
                      It's time to figure it out once.

                      and got what we got ..

                      Nothing depended on Russia there at all.
                      The Armenians got it because they were redneck money for military training. And they were "preparing for war" (in fact, they were driving a bald in the Soviet style) according to the budget option. "Arming" with free Russian weapons and "preparing for training in Russian military educational institutions."
                      And the Azerbaijanis made the right conclusions and really prepared for the war. Having spent a lot of money on it. Therefore, the war was won brilliantly. Because they were really armed and trained.

                      Yeah, only Ukrainians are richer

                      Here is the wealth rating of the median citizen in the post-USSR:
                      38 Estonia
                      42 Lithuania
                      60 Latvia
                      76 Armenia
                      78 Belarus
                      80 Turkmenistan
                      83 Kazakhstan
                      90 Moldova
                      98 Georgia
                      99 Azerbaijan
                      109 Russia
                      121 Kyrgyzstan
                      132 Tajikistan
                      143 Ukraine
                      Learn.
                    2. isofat Offline isofat
                      isofat (isofat) 28 January 2021 11: 32
                      0
                      Stanislas... As it turned out, he scribbles these ratings himself. Or edits. laughing
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                    3. isofat Offline isofat
                      isofat (isofat) 28 January 2021 12: 01
                      0


                      Stanislas, chase the rogue. This is a screen from where he pulls his comments. laughing
                      1. stepet Offline stepet
                        stepet 28 January 2021 12: 44
                        -5
                        Quote: isofat
                        This is a screen from where he pulls his comments.

                        Did you naively think that I am the only one reading Credit Suisse reports?
                        No, I think there are hundreds of thousands of such people. If not millions.
                        And you, if you are already sitting on the Internet all day, would be engaged in self-education.
                        All the benefits would be.
                        If not for people, then at least for you personally.
                        Or is there no special device for this in the body?
              2. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 23: 35
                +1
                Only auxiliary.
                Azerbaijan's main weapon is not Russian.
                There is simply no good Russian weapon.
                Can not be.
                Not released.

                You are either deliberately lying, or simply wishful thinking

                The Azerbaijani side received from the Russian Federation in 2013-2018 a significant amount of new production of land forces weapons:

                100 main tanks T-90S;
                118 BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicles;
                230 armored personnel carriers BTR-82A;
                166 artillery systems, including 18 self-propelled howitzers "Msta-S" of 152 mm caliber, 18 self-propelled guns "Vena" of 120 mm caliber (Azerbaijan became their launch customer), 18 combat vehicles of the Smerch multiple launch rocket system of 300 mm caliber, 24 combat vehicles of the TOS-1A "Solntsepek" heavy flamethrower system.

                https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/5598195/amp
                1. isofat Offline isofat
                  isofat (isofat) 28 January 2021 00: 11
                  +1
                  Stanislas... Of course, he is lying, but he lies cunningly, it is not a sin to learn from him, and not only from him.

                  We learn the art of Advertising, and they use it everywhere, even in presidential elections. Study, study and study again... yes
                  1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                    Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 00: 31
                    +1
                    It just bothers me that so many of these disinformers have got divorced lately .. soldier
                2. stepet Offline stepet
                  stepet 28 January 2021 01: 06
                  -5
                  Quote: Stanislav Bykov
                  You are either deliberately lying, or simply wishful thinking

                  Don't pay attention to this scrap metal.
                  You don't even understand what "modern weapons" are.
                  You live like in the 20th century.
                  1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                    Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 01: 19
                    +1
                    You are funny laughing you said that the Azeris do not have ros.arms, so enlighten with what they fought, what kind of superweapon did they throw lightning? laughing
                    1. stepet Offline stepet
                      stepet 28 January 2021 10: 55
                      -5
                      You are funny

                      Watch yourself more.
                      you said that the Azeris do not have Russian weapons
                      You are lying.
                      I wrote that there were sovesmtkie weapons. But AUXILIARY.
                      Here is all the scrap you listed.

                      so enlighten with what they fought, what kind of superweapon did they throw lightning?

                      Study the press.
                      Everything is written there.
                      I didn't hire you as a teacher.
                      1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
                        Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 18: 44
                        0
                        ... Watch yourself more.

                        Don't tell me what to do, and I won't tell you where to go, boilers, boilers and once again boilers from Donbass miners are the lot of your ukrovermacht, no matter what "modern weapon" he has laughing
        2. Mantrid Machina Offline Mantrid Machina
          Mantrid Machina (Mantrid Machina) 28 January 2021 00: 24
          +3
          but do not pay attention to the outpouring of bile by Jews and Hohlotrolls. Not worth it drinks
          1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
            Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 28 January 2021 00: 26
            +1
            Agree to all 100 drinks it is absolutely impossible to believe this and that
      2. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 27 January 2021 20: 26
        -4
        Quote: stepet
        Army pistol (MP) 10 years made, never made.

        Well, with the production of high-quality short barrels in Russia, it has not been very successful for a long time, so it's not surprising. Much more offensive is the other - many states and armed formations that traditionally used Soviet and Russian AKs are switching to other models of assault rifles. Even the elite units of Lebanese Hezbollah after 2006. armed their fighters M-16 and M-4. And the Vietnamese refused to build an AK production at their place and preferred to buy a license for the Israeli Galil. The trend, however ...
        1. stepet Offline stepet
          stepet 27 January 2021 22: 15
          -7
          Quote: Bindyuzhnik
          many states and armed formations that traditionally used Soviet and Russian AK are switching to other models of assault rifles.

          Smarter than steel.
          And richer.
          And poor AK is used only by those countries that have no problems with fertility. But they have money problems.
          After all, that AK, that AK-74, these are ersatz.
          Yes, well made in German. But this is not a full-fledged army weapon. This is a service weapon.
          Assault (not army) rifles in one word.

          Quote: Bindyuzhnik
          pass to other assault rifle models.

          No.
          From assault rifles (service weapons) they switch to full-fledged army weapons, army rifles.
          To make it clearer, the M16 and AK-74 are not classmates.

          Quote: Bindyuzhnik
          Even the elite units of Lebanese Hezbollah after 2006. armed their fighters M-16 and M-4. And the Vietnamese refused to build an AK production at their place and preferred to buy a license for the Israeli Galil. The trend, however ...

          Well, the Arabs (and not only them) simply always understood the difference between a good weapon and a Soviet one.
          While weapons from the USSR were free, as were the cartridges for it, everyone used Soviet weapons. As soon as Russia (instead of the USSR) began to ask for money for this weapon, they made a brick face and preferred to overpay a little more, but get a quality product.
          As for the Vietnamese, they simply saved. The Jews abandoned the Galilov (Galilas, these are the same Kalash, only in profile, they CANNOT be converted into a full-fledged army weapon, despite the fact that they are on the correct NATO cartridges) in favor of the M16, so they sold the plant cheaply. So the Vietnamese bought it.
          Now they don’t understand what. But it's cheap.
    3. Alexander K_2 Offline Alexander K_2
      Alexander K_2 (Alexander K) 27 January 2021 18: 10
      -3
      But as it flies, no worse than 5 +++++++
      1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
        Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 18: 28
        +4
        .But as it flies, no worse than 5 ++++++

        Nothing will fly for you, you should have jumped less on the Maidan
        1. Alexander K_2 Offline Alexander K_2
          Alexander K_2 (Alexander K) 27 January 2021 18: 35
          -2
          Ukraine has enough Boeings with Airbuses to fly on vacation, this is UraPatriots of Russia all preparing for war and all the time the war for them comes suddenly and veral!
          1. Stanislav Bykov Offline Stanislav Bykov
            Stanislav Bykov (Stanislav) 27 January 2021 18: 43
            +2
            What kind of vacation should you fly on? You will get to the Polish strawberry beds on foot
  4. alex5450 Online alex5450
    alex5450 (Alex L) 28 January 2021 17: 25
    -1
    An urgent need to ask the opinion of "American experts The National Interests" laughing
  5. Vladest Offline Vladest
    Vladest (Vladimir) 28 January 2021 19: 59
    -1
    Well, again it WILL BE! These endless breakfasts. They already know in advance that they will have ALL THE BEST. When it comes down to it, no one buys Superjets or SU57 falls and is forgotten.