Israel will hit Iran itself if the US refuses to do it

January 15 2021 77

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are hatching plans to attack Iranian territory in order to counter Tehran's nuclear ambitions and can launch these attacks even without the help of its military-strategic ally, the United States. This was reported on Thursday January 14 by the Israel Hayom newspaper.

The Chief of the General Staff of the Israeli Armed Forces, Lieutenant General Aviv Kohavi, spoke about "three alternative proposals" for solving the "nuclear problem" of Iran, connected with the beginning of Tehran's enrichment of uranium to the level of 20 percent. According to The Times of Israel, such a high percentage of enrichment is an intermediate link on the path to 90% enrichment of uranium, which could be enough to produce nuclear weapons.

The day before Israel Hayom's announcement, Likud spokesman Tsakhi Hanegbi noted that the IDF would strike at Iranian targets if newly elected US Democratic President Joseph Biden returns to the nuclear deal with Tehran and abandons joint actions with Israel to counter the Iranians. In the event Israel will have no other choice, since the country will be left face to face with Iran, which is gaining nuclear strength.

This, of course, we will not allow. We've already done what needed to be done twice

- Hanegbi emphasized, speaking of Israeli strikes on nuclear reactors in Iraq and Syria in 1981 and 2007, respectively.

Israeli Air Force

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

77 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Binder

-12

15 January 2021 17: 55

It goes without saying that the Israelis will not tolerate nuclear weapons in the hands of the Ayatollahs. The participation or non-participation in the operation to destroy the Iranian atom of the Americans will not play a decisive role. However, I think that they will participate because they understand that a nuclear Iran is a threat to all humanity and no one will be able to stay on the sidelines. The Persians are digging a deep hole for themselves, forcing the Israelis to resort to extreme measures.
1. Afinogen
  
  +3
  
  15 January 2021 18: 11
  
  This is the question. And Israel will not overreach alone? Iran is not a devastated and impoverished Syria, where you can strike without punishment. Iran may respond. In response, a swarm of missiles will fly across Israel, and then you will sit in the basements and think, but what for we needed. Frankly speaking, I am not a supporter of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
  1. Binder
    
    -2
    
    15 January 2021 23: 01
    
    Quote: Athenogen
    This is the question. And Israel will not overreach alone?
    
    Let's do it, not the first time.
    1. Afinogen
      
      0
      
      15 January 2021 23: 49
      
      Quote: Bindyuzhnik
      Let's do it, not the first time.
      
      Will we win it not for the first time, or will we sit out the missile strikes in basements not for the first time? Or both?
      1. Binder
        
        -1
        
        16 January 2021 06: 05
        
        And we will defeat the enemy, and we will provide reliable protection of our population from its barbaric rocket attacks - we are not the first.
        
        Afinogen
        
        +2
        
        16 January 2021 08: 05
        
        Quote: Bindyuzhnik
        we will provide reliable protection of our population from its barbaric rocket attacks
        
        Original So when you fly to bomb suddenly, a treacherously sovereign state is normal, this is the norm, but when a response from this state flies, it is already a barbaric missile strike. But as an option. And if you don't bomb? Then there will be no need to protect the population from barbaric attacks.
        
        Binder
        
        0
        
        16 January 2021 09: 44
        
        Quote: Athenogen
        when you fly to bomb suddenly, a treacherously sovereign state is normal, this is the norm, but when a response from this state flies, it is already a barbaric missile strike.
        
        You do not want to see where is the cause and where is its effect. The reason is that the Ayatollah regime considers its goal to be the destruction of the State of Israel, and Israel's actions are only necessary defense.
2. 123
  
  0
  
  15 January 2021 18: 41
  
  It goes without saying that the Israelis will not tolerate nuclear weapons in the hands of the Ayatollahs.
  
  Why is it so categorical? They also tolerate nuclear weapons.
  1. Binder
    
    +2
    
    15 January 2021 23: 02
    
    So we do not proclaim the destruction of Iran at the state level as our goal.
    1. 123
      
      -1
      
      16 January 2021 00: 18
      
      So we do not proclaim the destruction of Iran at the state level as our goal.
      
      Maybe they are just tired of what revolutions suit them? And the neighbors are being "democratized" into dust like Iraq.
      1. Binder
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2021 06: 02
        
        Quote: 123
        tired of that they are satisfied with the revolution?
        
        For the first time I hear that the Islamic revolution was arranged by some external forces for the Persians.
        
        123
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2021 07: 39
        
        If you've noticed, it says in the plural "revolution". Islamic first? 1953 doesn't count?
        As a rule, revolutions cannot do without support from abroad, and their leaders sit in foreign tents for the time being. Khomeini was no exception, he returned from France very on time, for sure the climate did not fit.
        
        Binder
        
        0
        
        16 January 2021 09: 36
        
        What did not fit Khomeini in France, I do not know, but the fact that this figure was not a henchman of "American imperialism" and "Israeli Zionism" is for sure.
        
        123
        
        0
        
        16 January 2021 15: 47
        
        What did not fit Khomeini in France, I do not know, but the fact that this figure was not a henchman of "American imperialism" and "Israeli Zionism" is for sure.
        
        Surely, if we find out about this, it will not be soon. Disputes about Lenin and the role of the "abroad" in the revolutionary movement are still ongoing.
Petr Vladimirovich

+1

15 January 2021 18: 01

"Three alternative proposals" One was announced, I wonder what other two?
Tamara Smirnova

+1

15 January 2021 18: 22

This could be a deadly number for Israel, its latest vicious assassin's ploy. Although I am against nuclear weapons in Iran.
steelmaker

-2

15 January 2021 18: 27

Unpunished and without retaliatory strikes on Syria and Israel imagines itself as "the center of the earth." On international laws and the UN spits. Iran needs help in developing nuclear weapons!
1. Binder
  
  -2
  
  15 January 2021 23: 15
  
  You will decide, my dear, otherwise in one comment you have -
  
  Quote: steel maker
  Frankly speaking, I am not a supporter of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
  
  and in the next -
  
  Quote: steel maker
  Iran needs help in developing nuclear weapons!
  
  As Khlestakov Gogolevsky said:
  
  I have an extraordinary lightness in my thoughts.
  1. steelmaker
    
    0
    
    16 January 2021 09: 13
    
    And I said this when you did not speak so openly about aggression. Therefore, I decided long ago that the state has the right to defend itself by any means! I repeat this constantly: "If I am not respected, why should I respect?"
    1. Binder
      
      0
      
      16 January 2021 09: 39
      
      Quote: steel maker
      the state has the right to defend itself by any means!
      
      So Israel intends to defend itself.
      1. steelmaker
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2021 09: 43
        
        Nobody attacks you and nobody bombs you! Your defense looks more like a gopnik from the gateway, but in fact you are criminals using terrorist methods on a national scale!
        
        Binder
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2021 09: 49
        
        Quote: steel maker
        Nobody attacks you and nobody bombs you
        
        This is happening solely because the Persians have no chance of winning today and they understand this. Therefore, strive to acquire their own nuclear weapons. Should I explain further?
        
        steelmaker
        
        -1
        
        16 January 2021 09: 58
        
        But in general, in your history, try to come to an agreement at least once. Or do you absolutely need all your wishes to be fulfilled? Do you recognize other agreements?
        
        Binder
        
        0
        
        16 January 2021 20: 32
        
        Quote: steel maker
        But in general, in your history, try to come to an agreement at least once.
        
        You, a citizen metallurgist, apparently do not know history well enough ... However, that is not the point - what should the Israelis negotiate with the Ayatollahs about? Ayatollah's uncles, don't destroy us, please? There are no objective reasons for the bestial hatred of these Shiite fanatics for the state of Israel, and there is no subject for negotiations as long as the current regime is in power in Tehran.
Eduard Aplombov

+2

15 January 2021 18: 29

they themselves are asking themselves that the Middle East will unite and begin to kill this people, problems from them wherever they take root, we only have a crowd on one of their ukhomats.
PRAVDORUB_2

0

15 January 2021 18: 38

Quote: Athenogen
This is the question. And Israel will not overreach alone? Iran is not a devastated and impoverished Syria, where you can strike without punishment. Iran may respond. In response, a swarm of missiles will fly across Israel, and then you will sit in the basements and think, but what for we needed. Frankly speaking, I am not a supporter of Iran getting nuclear weapons.

And so it will be .. Themselves ugan ... T
PRAVDORUB_2

-1

15 January 2021 18: 39

Quote: steel maker
Unpunished and without retaliatory strikes on Syria and Israel imagines itself to be the "navel of the Earth". It spits on international laws and the UN. Iran needs help in developing nuclear weapons!

Most likely it has already been created in Iran ..
1. Binder
  
  0
  
  15 January 2021 23: 16
  
  Quote: PRAVDORUB_2
  Most likely it has already been created in Iran ..
  
  Yeah, dream.
PRAVDORUB_2

-1

15 January 2021 18: 41

2 times rolled, the third comes out sideways .. The Iraqis and Syrians saved and built on the ground .. And the Persians did not save and did everything with the latest technology, underground, where the ammunition would not reach!
PRAVDORUB_2

+1

15 January 2021 18: 42

Quote: Bindyuzhnik
It goes without saying that the Israelis will not tolerate nuclear weapons in the hands of the Ayatollahs. The participation or non-participation in the operation to destroy the Iranian atom of the Americans will not play a decisive role. However, I think that they will participate because they understand that a nuclear Iran is a threat to all humanity and no one will be able to stay on the sidelines. The Persians are digging a deep hole for themselves, forcing the Israelis to resort to extreme measures.

You won't do anything .. Now this clown will sit out and they can take him out and put him in. Biden will come and bark at you like Obama and you will sit quietly again.
PRAVDORUB_2

-2

15 January 2021 18: 46

Quote: Tamara Smirnova
This could be a deadly number for Israel, its latest vicious assassin's ploy. Although I am against nuclear weapons in Iran.

You and we certainly cannot rejoice in someone else's yao! But the right to cho is the prerogative of the Iranian people and we have nothing to do with it. They made it, there are signs .. They already have missiles capable of carrying Yao for 5 years ... So they were not designed in vain ..
PRAVDORUB_2

-2

15 January 2021 18: 48

Quote: Athenogen
This is the question. And Israel will not overreach alone? Iran is not a devastated and impoverished Syria, where you can strike without punishment. Iran may respond. In response, a swarm of missiles will fly across Israel, and then you will sit in the basements and think, but what for we needed. Frankly speaking, I am not a supporter of Iran getting nuclear weapons.

Israel will not just burst out, but will explode from what Iran will bring down on it .. The Iranians will definitely take their souls away, there is motivation .. These are not disorganized Arabs .. The Persians rarely hit hard!
1. Cyril
  
  +1
  
  15 January 2021 19: 40
  
  They beat the Iraqis very "hard" during the Iran-Iraq war.
2. Tramp1812
  
  -1
  
  16 January 2021 15: 24
  
  On the Reporter, just a couple of days ago, another message was published about another raid by Hel Aavir on Iranian positions in the territory called Syria. About 60 dead Persians. And Iran wiped itself off. Here is the answer to your Wishlist.
3. Danila46
  
  -1
  
  17 January 2021 20: 57
  
  I will upset you: Iran not only will not respond to Israel after this attack (if any), it will not be able to do it for a very long time, because their information system already has worms that Israel sent them when it stopped their centrifuges and brought down the port logistics. Now these electronic saboteurs are just waiting in the wings. When this attack begins, Iran will plunge into pitch darkness ... They will not be able to boil the kettle, let alone throw missiles.
Alexzn

-3

15 January 2021 19: 20

Israel will strike at nuclear facilities in Iran as a last resort. Out of despair. Iran has declared one of the priority goals - the destruction of Israel. The goal is irrational, generated by ideology. It is not a fact that it will be possible to disrupt the creation of nuclear weapons, but rather only to postpone it.
I think Iran will create nuclear weapons in the foreseeable future, followed by Turkey, Egypt and the KSA. The world will become more stable, but more dangerous.
gorenina91

-6

15 January 2021 19: 33

- In the subject:

US military columns invade Syria after massive Israeli air strikes

- Personally, I have already spoken about ...

Two elderly old men started a fuss ... - Israel cannot wait for the FAS team from these senile people ... - and, most likely - it will never wait ... - and he himself is very afraid to start bombing Iran ...

- And what ... supposedly:

Israel will hit Iran itself if the US refuses to do it

- it's so unreal ... as if ... -
Cyril

-3

15 January 2021 19: 39

According to some sources, during the bombing of Iraqi nuclear facilities in 1981, Iran and Israel agreed to use the Iranian airfield, if necessary, for the landing of Israeli aircraft.

Cool if so. The vicissitudes of fate are wonderful.
Alexzn

0

15 January 2021 20: 06

Quote: 123
It goes without saying that the Israelis will not tolerate nuclear weapons in the hands of the Ayatollahs.

Why is it so categorical? They also tolerate nuclear weapons.

Not correct. We do not threaten Iran with destruction, or rather, this is not our goal.
Bakht

+2

15 January 2021 20: 49

IDF to strike at Iranian targets if newly elected US President Joseph Biden returns to nuclear deal with Tehran

If you really want to strike at Iran, then any far-fetched arguments will do. Either I do not understand something, or Tsakhi Hanegbi is inadequate.
The "nuclear deal" with Iran implied Iran's refusal to enrich uranium in exchange for lifting the embargo. That is, if Biden returns to the "nuclear deal" and Iran stops enriching uranium in exchange for lifting sanctions, then Israel will strike at Iran.
Am I confused anything?
1. Binder
  
  -3
  
  15 January 2021 23: 23
  
  Iran has not fully complied with the terms of the previous agreement and is not going to comply with the terms of the next one, if it takes place. And Tsakhi, of course, is not a beacon of thought, but in this case he is right.
  1. Bakht
    
    -2
    
    16 January 2021 01: 00
    
    According to the IAEA, Iran fully complied with all the conditions. It was this organization that was put in charge. You will find reports where it is said that Iran did not fulfill something, do not consider it a work, give a link.
    What I was not going to do, I did not even know that I was communicating with soothsayers.
    1. Binder
      
      0
      
      16 January 2021 05: 58
      
      Quote: Bakht
      According to the IAEA
      
      The fact of the matter is that the Persians have repeatedly obstructed IAEA inspectors from conducting checks at nuclear facilities, falsified data and provided deliberately false information. The intelligence services of Israel, the United States and a number of other states identified such actions of the Iranians and made them public. What kind of agreement can there be with such a partner?
      1. Bakht
        
        -1
        
        16 January 2021 11: 58
        
        I asked for links. According to the data that was published by the IAEA, none of the above is indicated by you.
        I don’t think you have access to the intelligence of Israel and the United States.
        Again. Monitoring compliance with the treaty was entrusted to the IAEA. I did not find any indication in their reports that Iran was violating something.
        This is not the crux of the problem. Israel initially opposed the "nuclear deal". So Israel does not care whether Iran enriches uranium or not. The strike on Iran is planned regardless of uranium enrichment.
        About "partners". Iran also thinks the same. What kind of agreement can there be with a partner who unilaterally breaks contracts? This applies not only to the "nuclear deoca". The states unilaterally sever any agreements with any countries. This is the trans-Pacific and Atlantic and the ABM Treaty and the INF Treaty and the Open Skies. Any sanctions are introduced against any country and company. In general, I do not see much point in concluding any agreements with the States.
        
        Binder
        
        -1
        
        16 January 2021 20: 18
        
        Quote: Bakht
        I asked for links. According to the data that was published by the IAEA, none of the above is indicated by you.
        
        What links are needed? The huge array of information on the Iranian nuclear program that Israeli intelligence officers managed to withdraw from Iran in January 2018, presented to the world community, removes all questions on this topic. By the way, the obtained documents were taken out to the territory of Azerbaijan and from there they were taken by special flight to Israel, which could not have been done without the knowledge of the highest-ranking officials of your state, for this the people of Israel feel deep gratitude towards your country. Naturally, I do not have access to intelligence information, however, if I did, then, as you understand, I would not share it here ...
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        16 January 2021 20: 58
        
        I heard about this story. In addition, the interested parties took something out there. And here is the official statement
        
        The Iranian authorities are fulfilling their obligations under the nuclear deal. This was stated by the UN Deputy Secretary General for Political Affairs Jeffrey Feltman. He presented a report on the implementation of the SC resolution adopted in support of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
        
        According to Feltman, The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in each of its seven reports on the implementation of the JCPOA, recorded Tehran's fulfillment of obligations related to its nuclear program.
        
        Binder
        
        0
        
        16 January 2021 22: 26
        
        Quote: Bakht
        And here is the official statement
        
        Official statements are not always true, it is common knowledge.
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2021 21: 02
        
        But another issue is being discussed here. Israel was ORIGINALLY opposed to a nuclear deal. And now a representative of the ruling party proposes to strike at Iran, if (just a minute) Iran agrees NOT to ENRICH uranium.
        Can you explain this logic? This one.
        You insist that Iran did not comply with the terms of the deal. The UN and the IAEA (the body controlling this deal) disagree with you. These are not some unclear who stole and unclear how taken out documents. This is the official position of the high parties.
        
        Binder
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2021 22: 31
        
        Quote: Bakht
        Israel was ORIGINALLY opposed to a nuclear deal.
        
        Because in Israel initially understood that the Ayatollah regime did not intend to abandon plans to create nuclear weapons.
        
        Quote: Bakht
        These are not some unclear who stole and unclear how taken out documents.
        
        Here everything is very clear and no one doubts the authenticity of the documents.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        16 January 2021 21: 07
        
        Azerbaijan denies export of Iranian nuclear archive by Israel through country's territory
        https://www.interfax.ru/world/611339
        
        Binder
        
        0
        
        16 January 2021 22: 32
        
        And this is understandable - Baku does not want to quarrel with the Persians.
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        17 January 2021 11: 51
        
        You have links to understandable messages from some Arab newspaper and stolen documents. I also love watching spy movies and rereading La Carré. But I still sometimes read OFFICIAL documents. 7 reports of IAEA inspectors are nothing for you.
        I repeat the original idea once again. If it is impossible to negotiate with Iran, because they are inveterate liars, then why do Obama and Trump and Biden want to conclude an agreement with them? And in Israel there are soothsayers who know everything in advance?
        My main message is that no agreements at all can be concluded with the States at this stage. Because they can withdraw from their obligations at any time. Iran quite rightly noted that they signed the "Obama agreement", then demanded from them to conclude the "Trump agreement", now they propose to conclude the "Biden agreement." What's next? Tehran does not see a US state with which it is possible to conclude a normal agreement. There are individuals who temporarily hold the post of President of the United States.
        And Israel, judging by this article and comments, does not even care about the presence of a nuclear program in Iran. Even if Iran concludes a treaty, the Israeli intelligence will steal documents from 10 years ago and declare that it is necessary to strike at Iran.
        
        Binder
        
        -1
        
        17 January 2021 17: 32
        
        Well, Bakhtiyar, if you want to continue to believe in the peacefulness and decency of the Ayatollahs, contrary to the obvious, it is a master's business. In the end, they are not going to wipe you off the face of the earth in Azerbaijan. And we in Israel have no reasons for such complacency, we intend to protect ourselves and our country from the threats of religious obscurantists emanating from Tehran. And for this we are ready to resort to the most radical measures if necessary.
Alexzn

-1

15 January 2021 21: 38

Quote: Bakht
IDF to strike at Iranian targets if newly elected US President Joseph Biden returns to nuclear deal with Tehran

If you really want to strike at Iran, then any far-fetched arguments will do. Either I do not understand something, or Tsakhi Hanegbi is inadequate.
The "nuclear deal" with Iran implied Iran's refusal to enrich uranium in exchange for lifting the embargo. That is, if Biden returns to the "nuclear deal" and Iran stops enriching uranium in exchange for lifting sanctions, then Israel will strike at Iran.
Am I confused anything?

So to speak
1. Hanegby does not determine the policy of the state, but is seen in boltology.
2. Israel believes that Iran itself will withdraw from the deal when everything is ready for a breakthrough in enrichment, therefore it opposes the deal.
1. Bakht
  
  +1
  
  15 January 2021 22: 05
  
  So to speak.
  1. The article says that he is a representative of the Likud party. Tell me this - is this a marginal party? Secondly, he has held a bunch of ministerial posts for god knows how many years. Are ministerial posts in Israel handed out to talkers?
  2. What Israel thinks speaks of the intention to strike no matter what. Observance of the "nuclear deal" was appointed not by Israel, but by the IAEA. Nobody asked Israel's opinion. And according to all the IAEA reports, Iran strictly adhered to the terms of the deal. What Israel believes is its own business.
  The last statement of the IAEA chairman from June last year "despite the fact that the US withdrew from the treaty, Iran is complying with all the agreements." The fact that Iran will start uranium enrichment was officially announced in January last year (a year ago).
  
  So if the US returns to the "nuclear deal," then Iran will stop enriching uranium. But Iran puts one more condition. Learned that the US cannot be trusted, Iran demands guarantees that no new sanctions will be imposed. Iran and the United States were not the only signatories. But also five other countries. And none of them welcomed the unilateral break of the agreement by the United States. I forgot, from your neighbors Saudi Arabia greeted. Israel and Saudi Arabia - brothers forever?
Alexzn

0

15 January 2021 22: 24

Quote: Bakht
So to speak.
1. The article says that he is a representative of the Likud party. Tell me this - is this a marginal party? Secondly, he has held a bunch of ministerial posts for god knows how many years. Are ministerial posts in Israel handed out to talkers?
2. What Israel thinks speaks of the intention to strike no matter what. Observance of the "nuclear deal" was appointed not by Israel, but by the IAEA. Nobody asked Israel's opinion. And according to all the IAEA reports, Iran strictly adhered to the terms of the deal. What Israel believes is its own business.
The last statement of the IAEA chairman from June last year "despite the fact that the US withdrew from the treaty, Iran is complying with all the agreements." The fact that Iran will start uranium enrichment was officially announced in January last year (a year ago).

So if the US returns to the "nuclear deal," then Iran will stop enriching uranium. But Iran puts one more condition. Learned that the US cannot be trusted, Iran demands guarantees that no new sanctions will be imposed. Iran and the United States were not the only signatories. But also five other countries. And none of them welcomed the unilateral break of the agreement by the United States. I forgot, from your neighbors Saudi Arabia greeted. Israel and Saudi Arabia - brothers forever?

The Likud is the ruling party.
All over the world, parliamentarians and ministers are often talkers.
Israel talks about the strike solely for security reasons. If Iran abandons the goal of destroying Israel, we will support any deals and lifting of sanctions.
IAHTE stated the same in the case of India and Pakistan.
1. Bakht
  
  -1
  
  16 January 2021 01: 05
  
  Have you carefully read the article and my question?
  MPs can be talkers. But the minister is an executive position. And usually ministers are not talkers. Plus, he is a representative of the ruling party. Not a marginal one, as you want to present it. And judging by the comments, the Israelis agree with him.
  So, if Iran stops enriching uranium and the United States returns to the deal, then should Iran be hit? Did I confuse anything?
  Now tell me, why would Iran stop enriching uranium?
Alexzn

+1

15 January 2021 22: 26

Quote: AlexZN
Saudi Arabia greeted your neighbors. Israel and Saudi Arabia - brothers forever?

Situational allies.
1. Bakht
  
  -1
  
  16 January 2021 01: 08
  
  This is our son of a bitch
  
  Congratulations on your ally
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

+1

15 January 2021 23: 42

Forward, sons of Yahweh! To Tehran! Lightning-fast attack by forces of 500 thousand Tsakhal will destroy the enemies of Yahweh!
Alexzn

+1

16 January 2021 08: 14

Quote: Bakht
Have you carefully read the article and my question?
MPs can be talkers. But the minister is an executive position. And usually ministers are not talkers. Plus, he is a representative of the ruling party. Not a marginal one, as you want to present it. And judging by the comments, the Israelis agree with him.
So, if Iran stops enriching uranium and the United States returns to the deal, then should Iran be hit? Did I confuse anything?
Now tell me, why would Iran stop enriching uranium?

Ministers are talkers too.
He is not marginal and there is logic in his words, but it should not be voiced.
The planning of a specific strike on nuclear facilities should not be presented as an abstract strike on Iran.
Once again, we do not consider today's agreement to be working. Iran is creating nuclear weapons, we think so and we are not ready to transfer the issue of our security to a third party.
1. isofat
  
  -2
  
  16 January 2021 21: 26
  
  Quote: AlexZN
  Ministers are talkers too.
  
  Quote: Jewish World
  The Israeli judicial system is rotten to the core and (for bribes or connections) makes decisions that are contrary to both justice and the laws that the Knesset passed.
Alexzn

+2

16 January 2021 08: 16

Quote: Bakht
"This is our son of a bitch"
Congratulations on your ally

A very taut parallel.
1. Bakht
  
  -1
  
  16 January 2021 12: 24
  
  This does not mean that it is incorrect ...
Alexzn

+1

16 January 2021 12: 34

Quote: Bakht
This does not mean that it is incorrect ...

Means. The original source spoke on behalf of a great power about a pocket dictator from a banana republic. In our case, we are talking about a situational alliance with a country that does not even have diplomatic relations with us.
1. Bakht
  
  +1
  
  17 January 2021 11: 59
  
  Situational ally is a very vague definition. So the comparison is correct. The presence or absence of diplomatic relations is irrelevant. With regard to Iran, Israel and Saud are not situational, but principled allies. I have nothing against allies. Moreover, Israel is now gathering a lot of allies among the Arab countries. This is good for the peace process.
  In this particular case, I see that Iran is gaining strength. In any case, in the Middle East, this is a state whose policy must be reckoned with. And Israel (as well as the Saud) needs to stop Iran. The Saudis are not good for that. The states don't want to fight. Israel remains. So you have the same goal. And your union is quite justified. This is your son of a bitch. Just like the American one. For the States, this turned out to be 11/XNUMX.
Japan

-1

16 January 2021 16: 03

Already allergic to this one - Israel! They are all to one place! They shoot, kill, shoot down planes, launch rockets and spit on the Russian Federation, etc. How greyhound they behave in Syria in front of the military from the Russian Federation, and the Russian Federation pretends that nothing has happened - a shame!
Igor Berg

0

16 January 2021 18: 12

Quote: Bindyuzhnik
Quote: Athenogen
when you fly to bomb suddenly, a treacherously sovereign state is normal, this is the norm, but when a response from this state flies, it is already a barbaric missile strike.

You do not want to see where is the cause and where is its effect. The reason is that the Ayatollah regime considers its goal to be the destruction of the State of Israel, and Israel's actions are only necessary defense.

Yes, in the modern world, everything has turned upside down ... So I shoveled a bunch of information, and nowhere did I find that Ukraine, for all its independence at the official, state level, set itself the goal of physically destroying the Russian Federation, or even seizing the Rostov or Oryol region. . and it turned out to be to the ass for us, our actions in the Crimea and in the southeast of Ukraine clearly show that we do not need reasons, no consequences ...
Alexzn

+1

17 January 2021 08: 40

Quote: isofat
Quote: AlexZN
Ministers are talkers too.

Quote: Jewish World
The Israeli judicial system is rotten to the core and (for bribes or connections) makes decisions that are contrary to both justice and the laws that the Knesset passed.

An obvious exaggeration. The connections work - definitely. Bribes in the judiciary are extremely rare. It is not even worth comparing the level of corruption in our countries.
PRAVDORUB_2

0

17 January 2021 23: 00

Quote: Bindyuzhnik
Quote: steel maker
Nobody attacks you and nobody bombs you

This is happening solely because the Persians have no chance of winning today and they understand this. Therefore, strive to acquire their own nuclear weapons. Should I explain further?

So you also have no chance of winning, that's why they begged the US for nuclear weapons?
PRAVDORUB_2

0

17 January 2021 23: 06

Quote: Bindyuzhnik
Well, Bakhtiyar, if you want to continue to believe in the peacefulness and decency of the Ayatollahs, contrary to the obvious, it is a master's business. In the end, they are not going to wipe you off the face of the earth in Azerbaijan. And we in Israel have no reasons for such complacency, we intend to protect ourselves and our country from the threats of religious obscurantists emanating from Tehran. And for this we are ready to resort to the most radical measures if necessary.

Nobody is going to wash you personally! Iran has claims to the leadership of the Zionists and their aggression .. So they should be pacified .. And if you feel very bad, then come to live in the Russian Federation .. We will not throw you like you do us ...
PRAVDORUB_2

0

17 January 2021 23: 10

Quote: Cyril
They beat the Iraqis very "hard" during the Iran-Iraq war.

Considering that the Iraqis attacked Iran, and the Iranians drove them out of Iran and eventually won .. Read about Karbala's operations 4.5.6 and so on.
PRAVDORUB_2

0

17 January 2021 23: 12

Quote: Bindyuzhnik
Quote: PRAVDORUB_2
Most likely it has already been created in Iran ..

Yeah, dream.

Why then are you so afraid and changing as if stung in one place?
PRAVDORUB_2

0

18 January 2021 14: 20

Quote: danila46
I will upset you: Iran not only will not respond to Israel after this attack (if any), it will not be able to do it for a very long time, because their information system already has worms that Israel sent them when it stopped their centrifuges and brought down the port logistics. Now these electronic saboteurs are just waiting in the wings. When this attack begins, Iran will plunge into pitch darkness ... They will not be able to boil the kettle, let alone throw missiles.

Is that why the Iranians turned off the lights in major cities in Israel?
PRAVDORUB_2

0

18 January 2021 14: 30

Quote: Rogue1812
scouts

Another Zionist disinformation twisted into your ears. people like you hawala .. It's all bullshit .. The Iranians have not gone anywhere but continue to develop Syria, Iraq, etc. .. The Zionists report heroic victories and titanic bombings, and as a result: Americans leave Syria under pressure from Iran. Iran has reached the borders of Israel in the north and south ..
Bibi rushes about .. Iran has pushed Israel again: the Persian lobby has again won in the USA. The United States will restore the deal to evil Israel and Israel's down-and-out sidekick, Gandonald Trump.
This alignment is actually
PRAVDORUB_2

0

18 January 2021 19: 00

Quote: AlexZN
Israel will strike at nuclear facilities in Iran as a last resort. Out of despair. Iran has declared one of the priority goals - the destruction of Israel. The goal is irrational, generated by ideology. It is not a fact that it will be possible to disrupt the creation of nuclear weapons, but rather only to postpone it.
I think Iran will create nuclear weapons in the foreseeable future, followed by Turkey, Egypt and the KSA. The world will become more stable, but more dangerous.

They won't do anything! Even the Americans are afraid to ram with Iran, and these desert dwarfs overestimate their strengths .. Hezbollah cannot be defeated and they puff on Iran .. Know the pug
PRAVDORUB_2

-1

19 January 2021 06: 09

I asked for links. According to the data that was published by the IAEA, none of the above is indicated by you.

What links are needed? The huge array of information on the Iranian nuclear program that the Israeli intelligence officers managed