Will Akademik Chersky finish building Nord Stream 2 at gunpoint by NATO ships?


The "last and decisive" battle for Nord Stream 2 is coming. In order to keep pace with President Putin's promised end of the first quarter of 2021, Gazprom appears ready to violate US sanctions. But will this lead to the desired start of the full-fledged operation of the Russian-German gas pipeline?


In order for the project to take place, it is necessary to complete three "quests" at once: to complete it on our own, bypassing the sanctions, to achieve its certification according to European standards bypassing the sanctions, and, finally, to remove the restrictive norms of the Third Energy Package, which left the pipeline half empty. The European partners left the first two tasks to Gazprom, while Germany, as the main beneficiary of Nord Stream 2, took the third solution.

The federal state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern has decided to create an environmental fund "Climate and Environment Protection MV", which is conceived as a way to circumvent American restrictions. This structure will not participate directly in the construction and management of the gas pipeline, but it can be used as a "buffer" for interaction between the rest of the project participants. It is assumed that this will be something like a European mechanism to bypass Washington's sanctions against the purchase of Iranian oil.

True, this is precisely what gives reason to doubt the viability of the ecological fund. Not a single EU company has ever used the mechanism to bypass restrictive measures and began to buy "black gold" from Tehran. This is understandable: the United States will still find out who bought the Iranian oil, so there were no people willing to be included in the “black list”. All this raises a logical question, what are the Germans counting on this time? The only reasonable explanation is that Berlin is hoping for a compromise with Washington on each individual Nord Stream 2 partner, which will operate through an environmental fund.

The second, much more realistic challenge facing Climate and Environment Protection MV is an attempt to remove the Russian-German gas pipeline from the EU Third Energy Package, which left one of its two pipes empty. These measures were openly discriminatory and absurd in nature, being taken for political reasons. There is simply no alternative gas supplier there. Theoretically, Nord Stream 2 can be taken out of the restrictions, giving it the status of a climate and environmentally significant project for Europe. Indeed, after its launch, the EU will receive an additional 55 billion cubic meters of "blue fuel", which will lead to a decrease in carbon dioxide emissions, and in the future, this transport network will be able to pump not only a mixture of gas with methane, but also hydrogen, which will give the project a "plus sign to karma. "

This is all well and good, but the pipeline has not yet been completed and certified. The main obstacles are US sanctions, which make the relevant international companies unwilling to risk being blacklisted by the US. Despite this, the Russian pipe-laying vessel Akademik Chersky appeared in Danish territorial waters, where it has no right to work without international insurance, which no one is ready to provide it yet. Is this a means of psychological pressure, or is Chersky, like the Varyag once, really ready to go for a breakthrough?

Hypothetically, this problem can be solved in two ways: either create the appropriate Russian companies that are destined to fulfill their mission and disappear under the yoke of sanctions, or simply buy existing foreign insurance and certification companies for exactly the same purposes. With the first, there may be serious difficulties on the part of the EU bureaucrats, but the second option is much more likely, there would be enough money. However, the press has not yet written about anything like that, so we will assume that the pipe-laying vessel still has no insurance. There is a strong impression that Gazprom intends to throw Akademik Chersky and other supply vessels into battle, regardless of the sanctions consequences.

If so, then this is a rather interesting approach that the European partners will appreciate. Curiously, what will the domestic monopolist do if NATO ships are forced out of Danish territorial waters by force? Call our Baltic fleet for help? Or is such a scenario not even considered?
Ad
The publication is looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 9 January 2021 12: 25
    +9
    The track does not pass through Danish territorial waters (12 nautical miles). There is a permit for laying in the EEZ.
    1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 11 January 2021 11: 22
      +1
      Quote: Petr Vladimirovich
      The track does not pass through Danish territorial waters (12 nautical miles). There is a permit for laying in the EEZ.

      A permit is one thing, boat insurance is another.
  2. Igor Berg Offline Igor Berg
    Igor Berg (Igor Berg) 9 January 2021 13: 02
    -4
    but the second option is much more likely, there would be enough money.

    The money should be enough .. Gazprom is not the first to waste it for political purposes .. And he also knows how to get it back from the population, the schemes have long been worked out and beaten ..
    1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 9 January 2021 13: 30
      +3
      It's horrible how I respect my foreign colleagues. They know everything, they have been everywhere (c). They will tell you how they will cut it off ... hi
  3. Cucumbers Offline Cucumbers
    Cucumbers (Cucumbers) 9 January 2021 14: 12
    -6
    This is what they think in Germany: During the extraction, transportation and combustion of natural gas, climate-damaging methane gas is released. According to the IPCC, the impact of methane on climate over 20 years is 86 times higher than the impact of CO2. The question we are faced with is: why is Germany investing in such a climate-damaging energy source when the federal government has a goal for Germany to switch to 2050% renewable energy by 100, i.e. would be climate neutral? It doesn't fit together ...... This is where the dog fumbled
  4. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 9 January 2021 15: 32
    -2
    It's all bullshit. About "the last and decisive" only here they wrote 5 times ...

    “Academician Chersky” has already sailed 5 times, sailed away, sailed again ... And no NATO interfered.
    Another 5tok floats, no problem. Gazprom has a lot of money ...
  5. oderih Offline oderih
    oderih (Alex) 9 January 2021 20: 36
    +3
    Chersky stands directly over the end of the pipe from the Germans. Already the 4th day. While the mosquito fishing Polish fleet interferes, what interferes. Up to 14 schooners sighted. Support vessels of Chersky (up to 5 were seen) are being successfully pushed aside. We are waiting for a sacred sacrifice. Water in the Baltic at 0 gr.
    1. oderih Offline oderih
      oderih (Alex) 9 January 2021 20: 51
      +4
      ps The main supplier of methane is tundra. While in the summer. Hello there Gretham Tumbergum
  6. 123 Online 123
    123 (123) 10 January 2021 10: 45
    +3
    If it goes on like this, the Germans will finish building it without Gazprom.



    As one of the versions, these two events have a certain relationship.

  7. kriten Offline kriten
    kriten (Vladimir) 10 January 2021 17: 33
    0
    We need to protect it with calibers ...