Defense of the South of Russia: a radar station will appear in Crimea, which has no analogues in the world

January 6 2021 18

In 2021, construction of a unique Yakhroma radar station will begin on the Crimean Peninsula. The radar will operate in four bands, and its coverage will be 270 degrees. About this agency TASS said a source in the Russian defense industry.

This station has no analogues, it will operate in four bands: meter, centimeter, decimeter and millimeter

- noted the interlocutor of the agency.

At the end of December, at the expanded board of the Russian Ministry of Defense, head of the department, Sergei Shoigu, reporting on plans for next year, announced the start of construction of the Yakhroma radar in Sevastopol and a number of individual elements for detecting airborne objects beyond the horizon in Kaliningrad and in the city of Zeya, Amur Region ...

In addition, Shoigu stressed the need to complete the construction and start functioning of the radar station in Vorkuta in 2021. Also, the head of the Ministry of Defense announced an increase in the defense capability of Russia in 2020 by 13 percent.

The Yakhroma radar station, which has no analogues in the world, will become an important element of warning about possible missile attacks from a potential enemy within the defense of the south of the Russian Federation. The main purpose of the complex is operational monitoring of ballistic missiles launched on the territory of Russia or its allies.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

The comment was deleted.
Machine_Learning

+3

6 January 2021 16: 33

Again there are no analogues in the world.
So soon the enemies of the khan.
RFR

+2

6 January 2021 20: 21

Good news ...
1. monman
  
  -5
  
  7 January 2021 06: 18
  
  Good news ...
  
  Hope the early warning system goes off and sends out an air raid alert in your area? I'm glad for you too ...!
  1. rotkiv04
    
    -1
    
    7 January 2021 09: 09
    
    We hope that the retaliatory strike will be struck in time, and not for survival.
Barmaley_2

-3

6 January 2021 20: 43

In the Russian Federation, everything has no analogues in the world and is unique, but only some Russians know about it, and sales of unique Russian weapons in the world have been falling lately, but the non-unique Chinese g @ vna is growing. Less pathos ...
1. 123
  
  +3
  
  7 January 2021 01: 21
  
  In the Russian Federation, everything has no analogues in the world and is unique, but only some Russians know about it, and sales of unique Russian weapons in the world have been falling lately, but the non-unique Chinese g @ vna is growing. Less pathos ...
  
  The task of the defense industry is primarily to ensure the country's defense capability, not to make money.
  If you do not understand the difference in quality and how important it is in the military sphere, use the Chinese "g @ vnom" for health, even spread it on sandwiches.
  1. Barmaley_2
    
    0
    
    7 January 2021 01: 30
    
    Hike this 123 does not understand the urgent recommendation to walk in the forest. In another form, the local Zarathustra here does not allow me to formulate the directions of movement of such as 123 broad-profile whistlers. And here's an ambush, it's not me, but my wallets and so on. For some reason, potential buyers of "the most unique and unparalleled" Russian weapons do not want to vote. Or am I somehow not very clear about screwing on the valve of useless pathos? Well, again and again: on this issue, please contact the moderator - I could say more intelligibly for some. Well, like 123.
    1. 123
      
      +3
      
      7 January 2021 02: 37
      
      What can I say ... learn to express yourself with decency. You know, I also lived in the barracks, I master specific turnovers of speech, but I try not to cause trouble for the respected moderators. Which I recommend to you too.
      As for the "wallet voting" itself, it is difficult to find a product that the Chinese do not make cheaper. Which does not at all mean poor quality, but only about the ability of the Chinese to produce weapons, albeit less reliable, but cheap. And it finds its buyer. The Chinese comrades themselves prefer Russian manufacturers. And then they sell copies of varying degrees of "success" to all sorts of rogue like you. So cover the blower, it is not even an hour to catch a cold. Good night.
      https://www.militarynews.ru/story.asp?rid=1&nid=518667&lang=RU
      1. Barmaley_2
        
        0
        
        7 January 2021 05: 24
        
        Within the bounds of decency for 123, I have repeatedly expressed myself, but 123, on the way, knows how to suck in information, which is served in an obscene-leading style. The pretentious-defective nonsense 123 does not interest me in any way, and I have repeatedly voiced this for 123. But 123 masochism makes him carry the next nonsense to get a new portion. WHAT is in my words for someone who even considers himself to be such an intellectual (which is far from being the case. And even not at all) that is not very clear? ABSOLUTELY clear dynamics for the loss of the world share (and significant) in arms sales, ALL miscalculations and over-advertisements (Karabakh, Libya, Syria) of many Russian weapons (such as c123, Pantsir, a lag in the UAV or catastrophic problems with ur class "air -air ", etc.) Well, people like you, jingoistic patriots, are not even close to admitting the obvious and destructiveness of all these useless cries about" we are ahead of the rest and are unique "). What are you unique about in Russia? That space has passed @ l @ and there is nowhere to go, etc., eh? You are trying to laugh with the beggar of Ukraine (well, so it does not pretend to be of some importance to the world, like the Russian Federation), like well, why should they modernize the old T300-64 - you can't blind a bullet and a Leopard-a72 tank they don't will become. And nothing, what is actually the same g @ vno in service with the tn ldnr are Ukrainians and are modernizing their t6 not to fight the Abrams and leopards, but just to confront the same ancient t64, etc., the armed forces of the rf and tn ldnr?
        And what kind of Chinese fake weapons am I buying? What's the next nonsense? I wrote 123 as a rogue ... You will swallow dust in order to achieve such a level of well-being like mine, etc.? Got it?
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        7 January 2021 06: 14
        
        I hope you have the validity at your fingertips?
        Why are you so worried about our arms sales is not clear. Do you broadcast about any "miscalculations and over-advertising"? Decrease in sales, where it is available, can be explained simply, payment is in dollars. In view of the "special position" of the overseas bourgeois on this issue, settlements under arms contracts are simply impossible, and buyers, as a rule, are firmly seated on evergreen candy wrappers. Until alternative payment schemes are established, sales will not reach normal volumes.
        
        catastrophic problems with ur air-to-air class, etc.
        
        From now on, please, in more detail, especially about etc.... Just tap the sedative beforehand, otherwise your favorite words with @ are rushing from all the cracks
        
        What are you unique about in Russia?
        
        Come take a look.
        
        That space has passed @ l @ and there is nowhere to go, etc., eh?
        
        This is not a fact, but in general everything is known in comparison. Share your successes in this area Very curious to listen
        
        You are trying to laugh with the beggar of Ukraine (well, so it does not pretend to be of some importance to the world, like the Russian Federation)
        
        Who's to blame? Why not laugh if there is a reason? Moldovans, for example, do not seem to live very richly, and I don’t remember any jokes in front of them. Maybe Ukraine itself gives a reason? It's funny to watch how a country that has betrayed and sold everything that is possible, from the memory of ancestors and language, ending with all the models of available weapons, turns into your favorite @. And it pretends to be significant, and this is especially funny.
        
        like, well, how could they modernize the old t64-72 - you can't blind a bullet and they won't become a Leopard-a6 tank. And nothing, what is actually the same g @ vno in service with the tn ldnr are Ukrainians and are modernizing their t64 not to fight the Abrams and leopards, but just to confront the same ancient t72, etc., the armed forces of the rf and tn ldnr?
        
        First, the T-64 and T-72 tanks are about the same level.
        Secondly, where did you get the idea that the Leopard is something new and supernatural? Version 2A6 will be 20 years old next year, 2A7 will soon be 10 years old.
        Do you just like the crosses on the towers?
        Thirdly, they shouldn't modernize them. If they are stupid and after Ilovaisk and Debaltseve did not understand anything, so much the worse for them. An extra reason to laugh.
        
        And what kind of Chinese fake weapons am I buying? What's the next nonsense? I wrote it down as a rogue.
        
        Sorry, got excited you do not reach this category ... Do you prefer to make do with low-quality copies of Chinese samples or what will NATovtsy donate from the master's shoulder?
        
        Do you want to swallow dust in order to achieve such a level of well-being like mine, etc.? Got it?
        
        Does the strawberry farm pay that good? I'm very happy for you
        
        Barmaley_2
        
        -2
        
        7 January 2021 15: 26
        
        The drunk will sleep it off, never, and the pretentious-defective nonsense 123 doesn't interest me in any way. What I have already voiced. So play your masochistic games without me. I'm not going to answer the stupidest questions 123. One last remark 123 is enough to evaluate and compare the facts. And yet yes - they pay much more on strawberry plantations in Poland (although I have never worked there and have never been there) than on Russian ones. But living in his wretched little world 123 "unique and unsurpassed", he sees nothing beyond his nose.
        
        Separately for hurray-p @ tsr @ ota with extremely primitive and narrow thinking about specific problems of the Russian air-to-air missiles
        https://topwar.ru/178756-vks-rossii-pered-licom-novoj-ugrozy-chem-chrevato-pojavlenie-meteorov-i-jnaam-u-nashih-vozdushnyh-rubezhej.html
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        7 January 2021 15: 51
        
        Barmaley_2dear!
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        7 January 2021 17: 16
        
        Separately for hurray-p @ tsr @ ota with extremely primitive and narrow thinking about specific problems of the Russian air-to-air missiles
        
        What a curious article on the link
        
        to equip multifunctional fighters of the transitional generation Su-30SM / 1/2 and Su-35S, as well as ultra-long-range RVV-BD (R-37M / "Product 610M") for integration into ammunition, such as Su-35S fighters and MiG-31BM interceptors, and the 5th generation Su-57 multipurpose fighters, still do not provide the ability to intercept highly maneuverable aerospace attack weapons (including tactical aviation and promising supersonic anti-ship missiles) at a distance of more than 90-100 km.
        
        Knowing how much you love my questions, I would like to ask a couple more.
        1) The article contains not a word about the ability of the new Meteor missile to shoot down promising hypersonic missiles. If not, what benefit are you talking about?
        What an interesting logic, our missiles lack maneuverability in the final phase of the flight, so everything is bad. NATO missiles are not capable of shooting down our hypersonic missiles, but that is another matter.
        2) To carry out "interception of highly maneuverable means of aerospace attack (including tactical aviation and promising supersonic anti-ship missiles) at a distance of more than 90-100 km." is it possible only with the help of fighters or will we be graciously allowed to use air defense? For example S-400. By the way, I wonder when the Europeans will do something like that. the author did not say a word about this in the article. Can you tell us?
        
        Barmaley_2
        
        -1
        
        7 January 2021 18: 07
        
        Especially for individual hooray @ cr @ otov who consider themselves the smartest in this world, and my swamp is the most swampy, ala-123, I have repeatedly given one universal answer to all their stupid questions (all the same, no facts or reality for they are not an argument) and I can repeat: walk in the forest!
        Personally, 123 I authorize to attach 40N6E missiles from s400 to aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces and use as much as his heart desires: one h @ rt, if a body, such as 123, does not understand what it is about and does not understand the difference between air defense and fighters to gain air superiority as well as the fact that the main and primary task of these is the destruction of their own equal, the same fighters just for this very conquest of air superiority, and not hypersonic missiles. And the article just indicates why there is a problem for Russian missiles " "in the destruction of highly maneuverable targets at long ranges. But 123 may not bother. For dancing with a tambourine and screaming" We are the most unique and unsurpassed "such difficulties are useless to know.
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        7 January 2021 19: 41
        
        Personally, 123 I allow you to attach 40N6E missiles from the s400 to the Russian air force aircraft and use as much as your heart desires: one h @ rt, if a body like 123 does not understand what it is about and does not understand the difference between air defense and fighters for gaining air superiority, as well as the fact that the main and primary task of these is the destruction of their own equal fighters of the same kind just for this very conquest of air superiorityrather than hypersonic missiles.
        
        That's it .. but I thought Washed again Just in case, I climbed into the damned Wikipedia ...
        
        Air supremacy is the decisive air superiority of one of the belligerents in theater airspace. In terms of scale, it can be strategic, operational and tactical. A decisive role in the conquest air supremacy belongs Air force and air defense troops.
        
        As you can see, there are no contraindications for the participation of air defense in the noble cause of gaining air supremacy.
        Moving on to your favorite part, to the questions
        1) Is in this case our fighters have a different task? Do they not need to destroy their own kind, and not to shoot down supersonic missiles? Should they be gaining air superiority in some other way? Is it different again?
        2) Do you not know that "attaching 40N6E missiles from s400 to Russian air force aircraft" is not at all necessary? They fly perfectly from ground launchers.
        
        And in the article it is precisely indicated why there is a problem for Russian "in-in" missiles in the destruction of highly maneuverable targets at long ranges
        
        So ... So we are no longer interested in any "promising supersonic anti-ship missiles"? This is what the life-giving "Zircon" does But then it turns out, you think that the author of the article you are referring to is not so right?
        
        So, what else is there ...
        
        do not provide the ability to intercept highly maneuverable aerospace attack assets (including tactical aviation and promising supersonic anti-ship missiles) at a distance of more than 90-100 km.
        
        Remains tactical aviation and ... that's it? Or can you suggest some other highly maneuverable goals? Can't shoot down her air defense at long distances, too?
        
        Yes, I almost forgot, another kind request to arrange the comment in a different way. In the first part there is information, in the second (in a separate paragraph) all snot and drool. So the consequences of a shell shock when taking Tortuga will not be striking
        
        Barmaley_2
        
        -2
        
        8 January 2021 00: 11
        
        There are primary and secondary tasks, but you are still a stubborn hurray-n @ tsriot and this is not yours.
gorenina91

-2

7 January 2021 15: 07

Defense of the South of Russia: a radar station will appear in Crimea, which has no analogues in the world

- Yeah ... - When Azerbaijan, to put it mildly ... - "offered" Russia to increase the rent from 7 to 300 million dollars for Russia's "use" of the Russian Gabala radar station, which is located on the territory of Azerbaijan (and then the presidential administration D. Bush pressed on Azerbaijan, "friendly" to Russia); then ... then ... then Russia ... - again ... "to put it mildly" ... - it was simply forced to lose this very necessary Gabala radar station ... - and even ... - in 2006 ...
- 15 years have passed and now ... and this is how this loss turned out ...
- There is not even much to guess here ... - really, Russia and Azerbaijan are doing "very, very" ... "very, very" ... - again "to put it mildly" .. - not very good ...
- Only today Azerbaijan is being "pressed" not so much by the Americans ... - as Erdogan is "pressing" ...
- For some reason, everyone has recently "carried away" the discussion of Armenia, unfriendly for Russia (this business ... is also very necessary) ... - But on the sly, on the other hand, not very friendly "Erdogan's" Azerbaijan has already crept up to Russia. .. - such, brother ... business ...
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

+2

7 January 2021 23: 46

And a beautiful radar station! Just like in a science fiction movie! Well done!