The United States sent a special plane to Iran, which can speak of an imminent attack on the country


On the evening of December 26, 2020, there was an increased activity of US Air Force tanker aircraft over the Gulf countries. At the same time, at least six Boeing KC-135R aircraft were present in the sky.


In addition, monitoring resources have recorded the appearance in the Persian Gulf region of the US Air Force Lockheed EC130H Compass Call. It took off from Ahmed al-Jaber airbase in Kuwait and flew around several adjacent countries. According to a number of experts, the direction of this specialized aircraft to the borders of Iran may indicate an imminent American attack on this country.


It should be noted that Compass Call was used by the USA in Yugoslavia, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries. Their appearance in the sky is often associated with the approach of war, calling it harbingers of trouble.


Lockheed EC130H Compass Call aircraft are designed for various electronic attacks, disrupting enemy communications (jamming), interfering with the operation of its command and control systems, influencing enemy radars for early warning and detection, suppressing air defense systems, conducting offensive counter-information operations and supporting tactical air , surface and special forces of the United States. It is one of the three major US electronic warfare aircraft, along with the Boeing EA-18 Growler and the F-16CJ Fighting Falcon.

Note that Iran has already unrolled air defense systems in anticipation of a possible strike by the United States and Israel. The Iranian coast also is a joint of the American fleet and an Israeli submarine of the Dolphin class.
  • Photos used: Senior Airman Jacqueline Hawkins / wikimedia.org
Ad
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 27 December 2020 11: 02
    +2
    Isn't it time to assemble the UN Security Council?
    1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
      Just a cat (Bayun) 27 December 2020 11: 18
      +1
      As in front of Serbia, Libya, Iraq?
      1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 27 December 2020 11: 35
        0
        There was no Security Council before Yugoslavia and Iraq. But before Libya, they definitely collected it. Personally, it was unpleasant for me then to watch how Dmitry Anatolyevich made excuses "We missed" ... (((
        1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
          Just a cat (Bayun) 27 December 2020 11: 49
          +2
          "Dmitry Anatolyevich" personally reminds me of Nicholas II outwardly and in his "decisiveness" .... The main members of the UN have the right to veto. Neither the United States can prevent Russia with China, nor Russia and China can prevent the United States. Gentlemen go there to talk and eat.
          1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 27 December 2020 12: 25
            +3
            The five permanent members of the Security Council have veto powers. Without a Security Council decision, military action would mean an act of aggression.
            1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
              Just a cat (Bayun) 27 December 2020 12: 40
              +2
              And who recognizes this as an act of aggression?))) The Hague, whose decisions are binding only for Ukraine? We live in an interesting time.
              1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 27 December 2020 15: 03
                0
                Yes, it seems like the UN at the Conference in San Francisco for this and stirred up so that, therefore, there would be no more wars on the planet. We wanted the best, but it turned out, as always ...)))
                1. Piramidon Offline Piramidon
                  Piramidon (Stepan) 27 December 2020 15: 29
                  0
                  Quote: Petr Vladimirovich
                  Yes, it seems like the UN at the Conference in San Francisco, for this purpose, was stirred up so that, therefore, there would be no more wars on the planet.

                  You need to somehow imagine the shark as a crucian.
            2. boriz Offline boriz
              boriz (boriz) 27 December 2020 14: 21
              +4
              Well, the attack on Yugoslavia was an obvious, and even a group (aggravating circumstance) act of aggression (banditry). So what?
              Nobody cares. Are there many cancer patients from the use of depleted uranium in ammunition? And you prove it.
    2. associate professor_2 (Srul Solomonovich) 31 December 2020 21: 33
      0
      What's the point ??? They spit on the opinions of others!
  2. Binder Offline Binder
    Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 12: 52
    -9
    Numerous publications by the Russian media about the strengthening of American and Israeli activity near Iran are very reminiscent of the behavior of Soviet diplomacy on the eve of the Six Day War. Then, in 1967. there were no reports in the Soviet media, the information was given directly to the leaders of Egypt, but its meaning was very similar - the Arabs were pushed into war, giving them misinformation about the mobilized Israeli forces stationed near the border that were supposedly ready to attack Syria. Israeli intelligence became aware of these reports. The Soviet ambassador to Israel was invited by the then Prime Minister Levi Eshkol and invited him to personally fly around the area of ​​the alleged concentration of troops near the Israeli-Syrian border by helicopter to make sure that this information was incorrect. However, the ambassador refused the offer, stating literally the following:

    My responsibilities include spreading the point of view of the leadership of the USSR, and not refuting the information received from Moscow!

    In other words, the then Kremlin leadership unambiguously provoked the Arabs to start a war with Israel, being confident in the imminent victory of their wards over the hated Zionists. What this provocative behavior has resulted in is known to everyone today, do the current leaders of the Russian Federation really do not know history at all?
    1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
      Just a cat (Bayun) 27 December 2020 13: 12
      +1
      And so you wanted to attack the quiet and arrange a blitzkrieg in Egypt? laughing
      1. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 17: 16
        -5
        The Blitzkrieg was staged despite the help and support from the USSR. bully
        1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
          Just a cat (Bayun) 27 December 2020 17: 29
          +1
          I see how Iraq staged a blitzkrieg against the Kurds, with the support of the United States, Georgia against Ossetia and the Hohland against Donbass ... who will the United States "support" next? laughing Or maybe it's time to put the orange orchards that used to belong to the Palestinians in order?
          1. Binder Offline Binder
            Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 17: 53
            -6
            All the gardens in Israel were planted by Jews and are maintained in exemplary order. And the "Palestinians" have no chance here.
            1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
              Just a cat (Bayun) 27 December 2020 18: 00
              +3
              And the pyramids in Egypt and the Black Sea are the work of Ukrainians ... I've heard a lot.
              1. Binder Offline Binder
                Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 18: 01
                -5
                On this issue I can not say anything - not in the subject.
                1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
                  Just a cat (Bayun) 27 December 2020 18: 14
                  +3
                  But I'm in the subject ... Israel has repeatedly increased its holdings, pushing back the Palestinians. So the Palestinians who planted oranges are still alive.
                  1. Binder Offline Binder
                    Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 19: 45
                    -4
                    Quote: Just Cat
                    But I'm in the subject ...

                    It just seems this way to you. lol And the Palestinians have never planted anything worthwhile.
    2. 123 Offline 123
      123 (123) 27 December 2020 13: 46
      +3
      In other words, the then Kremlin leadership unambiguously provoked the Arabs to start a war with Israel, being confident in the imminent victory of their wards over the hated Zionists. What this provocative behavior has resulted in is known to everyone today, do the current leaders of the Russian Federation really do not know history at all?

      And where does the leaders of the Russian Federation? belay Do you want to say that they are "pumping up" in the press? Do they want Iran against you and the Americans who are confident in its quick victory? The analogy is far-fetched, rather than a Faberge.
      Has the Russian leadership also sent your boat to the shores of Iran? Did they also lift American tankers into the sky?
      "Signals" are quite alarming, it is stupid not to notice them. Not so long ago, Russian planes were not allowed to fly over the Caspian Sea ... and a little later ... well, everyone knows.
      I wonder if your management knows the story? Does he make any conclusions for himself? Fortune is so capricious and changeable ...
      1. boriz Offline boriz
        boriz (boriz) 27 December 2020 15: 26
        +6
        Very few people are interested in the opinion of their leadership. Israel and Iran have no real reasons for conflict. But they regularly bully, first with Iraq, now with Iran.
        The world is on the eve of a division into currency zones. And the World Bank really wants to organize its own zone, although it does not have the resources for this. And among the powers of the first rank, Russia has always been and will be opposed to the WB being present at the division of the world as a party with the right to vote.
        One of the options for creating a WB of its own zone (and it requires from 400 to 000 population) is to include Arab countries in such a zone. Most of them are not strongly opposed, but put forward one condition: the dismantling of the state of Israel.
        South of Ukraine, including Crimea, was considered as an option. But Putin broke off this option.
        Judging by the escalation of the situation, Israel will be substituted, like Georgia in 2008, Armenia (brought to power by Pashinyan), Ukraine in 2014.
        Iran will be forced into an armed response, and if the strike hits Israel's nuclear facilities, the territory will become uninhabitable. Iran cannot reach the United States, and Israel is at hand.
        Our local Zionist trolls, personally, may be washed off to the reserve sites (including to the demoralized Russia), but who will need almost 10 million inhabitants of the state, which has established itself as an arrogant scumbag - a question.
        I foresee the heroism of Miron and others like him: "Yes, let them just try, but we have them! ..."
        Well, yes, you them ...
        But, I propose to look at the map. Iran is big, several nuclear strikes are very unpleasant, but not fatal. But what the neighbors (not only Iran) will do with the population of Israel will look very unpleasant. And the world community will express a very serious concern .... Well, just VERY serious. And he will declare a blockade of the region in order to stop the conflict. And even earlier, such a blockade will be announced by the neighbors. Only a blockade from the sea is very easy to carry out. It is not difficult to blow up pipelines to Israel. But controlling the blockade on land is a problem. That is, Israel is being blocked, but other states are a big question. Especially if there is no desire.
        Israel has no resources. No one will fit in with the armed forces for Israel. And how long will Israel last? And only then the real holocaust will come.
        This is by no means a call for genocide. Just a logical analysis of the situation.
        If the idea of ​​such a blockade raises doubts, then I can tell you that this is not my idea. Read the history of the Spanish Civil War before WWII. None of the "progressive" mankind began to support the legitimate, democratically elected government (except for the USSR), but declared (except for the USSR) a blockade of Spain so as not to interfere with Germany and Italy to establish a fascist regime there.
        Therefore, in order to avoid such a scenario, Israel had to (should) sit quietly, pursue a consistent policy, build normal relations with its neighbors, and not get dodgy like a crazy scumbag.
        And hoping for help from the United States and the World Bank is the height of stupidity. History teaches nothing.
        For the United States, the territory of present-day Israel will be far beyond their zone. The creation of the WB zone involves the dismantling of Israel. Although they will not be able to achieve the zone anyway, this will not worry anyone.
        And, like, Jews are considered smart people.
        1. Binder Offline Binder
          Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 16: 11
          -5
          Quote: boriz
          they regularly bully, first with Iraq, now with Iran.

          It turns out that the Israelis openly declare that their goal is to wipe Iran off the face of the earth ...

          Quote: boriz
          South of Ukraine, including Crimea, was considered as an option. But Putin broke off this option.

          The fabulist Krylov is no match for you. fool

          Quote: boriz
          Israel will be substituted, like Georgia in 2008, Armenia (by bringing Pashinyan to power), Ukraine in 2014.


          Is Israel going to be framed? Oh well... wassat

          Quote: boriz
          Just a logical analysis of the situation.

          Alas, there is no knowledge of the real state of affairs, no logic in your post. An analogy with republican Spain does not suggest itself.

          Quote: boriz
          And, like, Jews are considered smart people.

          Well, it depends with whom to compare. Jews, like representatives of all other peoples, are different. However, what you have written here does not at all indicate a great mind, forgive me for being frank. hi
          1. boriz Offline boriz
            boriz (boriz) 27 December 2020 18: 37
            +7
            When I am interested in your opinion about me, I will definitely ask you.

            It turns out that the Israelis openly declare that their goal is to wipe Iran off the face of the earth ...

            We have already discussed this topic with you. And they said that Israel has no reasons for conflicts with Iran. And in the second half of the 2s, the relationship was decent. But, after 90. Iran was declared belonging to the "axis of evil" and Israel joined this US policy.
            And now, after killing two key people in Iran, you have sent your submarines to Iran and, most likely, you will allow yourself to be drawn into shelling of its territory. Moreover, you will probably be the first to shoot. It will be impossible to prove that you didn’t shoot. If you shoot YABCH, you risk getting an ultimatum with a high probability (as it already happened in the USSR).
            And in the answers it is worth giving something other than emotional outbursts and pearls at the level "you yourself have not washed for three days."
            1. Binder Offline Binder
              Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 19: 50
              -1
              Quote: boriz
              in the 2nd half of the 90s, relations were decent

              Decent Israeli-Iranian relations were under the Shah, after the Islamic revolution, the Iranian leadership announced its desire to destroy Israel. Since then, Tehran's attitude towards Israel has been consistently extremely hostile.
              1. boriz Offline boriz
                boriz (boriz) 27 December 2020 20: 29
                +2
                The election of Mohammad Khatami, a representative of the more moderate layers of the Muslim leadership, as President of Iran in 1997, led to some softening of the anti-Jewish position of Islamic leaders. In November 2001, President Khatami made it clear for the first time that Iran might eventually recognize Israel's right to exist if the Palestinians recognize Israel.

                https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/681667
                Everything is relative. But then Bush specifically hit Iran,
                In 2002-3. Iran assisted in the fight against al-Qaeda, in 2003. put forward a number of positive proposals, but was included by Bush in the Axis of Evil, a memorandum of Iran from 2003. was rejected.
                Who likes it when they start to nightmare you for no reason.

                After Israel destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor and put on the agenda the issue of the atomic threat in the Middle East region, Iran began to constantly call on the world community to condemn Israel as a state that refuses to sign under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and does not hide the fact that it has such weapons available. At the same time, statements from the Iranian side began to be heard more and more often that if Iran's neighbors do not respond to the proposal to create a nuclear-free zone, then Iran will have to worry about ensuring its security itself.

                http://www.iimes.ru/?p=4542
                There is also such a point of view.
                1. Binder Offline Binder
                  Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 20: 43
                  -2
                  Quote: boriz
                  Iran may eventually recognize Israel's right to exist,

                  Don't you think that such a formulation of the question is humiliating? We in Israel do not need the recognition of the Persians.

                  Quote: boriz
                  After Israel destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor and put on the agenda the issue of the atomic threat in the Middle East region, Iran began to constantly call on the world community to condemn Israel

                  Paradoxically, the Persians must bow deeply to the Israelis for destroying the Iraqi reactor. If Saddam had nuclear weapons, he would have used it without the slightest doubt in the Iran-Iraq war that broke out soon.
        2. Diver d Offline Diver d
          Diver d (Oleg) 27 December 2020 16: 58
          -1
          I wonder where did you see Israel's plight in the political arena? What kind of blockade can we talk about now, when recently the Arab countries have been establishing diplomatic relations and the old ones are strengthening. The only reservation for those who have not yet done so is the Palestinian question. Although, already now it is becoming obvious to many that his solution has long been no longer in the plane of Israeli policy, but in the inability and unwillingness to resolve it on the part of the Abas administration. By the way, that is why it is not heard in the press at all about him. He was consigned to oblivion as a reminder that he needs to decide something, and not sit and repeat old mantras. The old enemy Erdogan suddenly, himself, personally started talking about improving relations with Israel right now, when he saw that his economy was beginning to collapse and he had to change its direction in relation to his former allies, even Aliyev’s mediation was advancing, that is, all the levers that only can be used to normalize relations. Hamas is personally leading the arrests of those who are trying to strike Israeli territory. And not because he suddenly became preoccupied with philanthropy, but because he understands that if Israel blocks the channel for Qatari money and the stability of this group will come to an end. It got to the point that Hamas began to persuade the Arab parties of Israel to support Netanyahu, because with the arrival of another candidate at the elections, this trickle may run dry, who knows. And then a confrontation is already possible, with Israel's subsequent transfer of power to Hamas from the Gaza Strip to their competitors in Ramallah.
          1. boriz Offline boriz
            boriz (boriz) 27 December 2020 18: 40
            +2
            If Israel, along with the United States, were the first to shell Iranian territory, the situation could change dramatically.
        3. boriz Offline boriz
          boriz (boriz) 27 December 2020 17: 56
          +1
          but requires from 400 to 000 population

          The error, of course, is 400 million - 600 million.
      2. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 15: 59
        -5
        Quote: 123
        And where does the leaders of the Russian Federation?

        Do you seriously think that such publications in the Russian Federation today appear without the knowledge of those in power?

        Quote: 123
        Fortune is so capricious and changeable ...

        That is why our leadership keeps its finger on the pulse ...
        1. 123 Offline 123
          123 (123) 27 December 2020 16: 25
          +1
          Do you seriously think that such publications in the Russian Federation today appear without the knowledge of those in power?

          First, a significant share of the "information market" is not controlled by the state; rather, on the contrary, the influence of private traders and foreign states is quite large.
          Secondly, what's wrong? Are the facts wrong or not worth writing about?

          That is why our leadership keeps its finger on the pulse ...

          Where is it? The pulse can be measured in different places. Let them keep their hands in their pockets better, so everyone will be calmer. At least they will not press anything by accident smile
    3. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 27 December 2020 15: 19
      0
      Did you work in the USSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1967? Share, we are all friends and colleagues on this site. Moreover, all the subscriptions of secrecy that you had expired long ago.
      PS: and "provocative" is really cool ... !!! Respect!
      1. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 15: 55
        -5
        In 1967 I was a Soviet pioneer, and you can easily find the facts of history on the net, google for help!
        1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 27 December 2020 16: 21
          0
          And I was in the 1967th grade in 7! Peers !!! But I always write what I saw or know for sure. In 1969, the whole class did not go to throw cans of ink into the Chinese embassy? And Google is a good thing, you can always push it on ... good
          1. Binder Offline Binder
            Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 17: 49
            -4
            Apparently you are a couple of years older - in 1967 I only moved to 5th grade. And the cans of ink were not thrown into the Chinese embassy - it was far from the Hero City of Odessa. As for the memories of the Six Day War, the following episode is preserved in memory:
            In those days, on the Yalta embankment not far from the Oreanda hotel, several Jews were discussing the course of the war; a heavily screwed border guard lieutenant was walking by. He takes out a cigarette from a crumpled pack, asks one of the Jews to light a cigarette and bending over his Belomorina quietly says - "You, comrades Jews, don't worry, your fellows are there - they give a black ... ohm about .... tsya!" And leaves trying not to stagger ...
    4. Piramidon Offline Piramidon
      Piramidon (Stepan) 27 December 2020 15: 33
      +3
      Quote: Bindyuzhnik
      In other words, the then Kremlin leadership ...

      Remember also what Ivan IV did. What century do you live in? What does the Soviet leadership have to do with it?
      1. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 15: 53
        -6
        Think, head - I'll buy a cap! laughing
        1. boriz Offline boriz
          boriz (boriz) 27 December 2020 18: 44
          +5
          Your cheap, meaningless jokes are already tired.
      2. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 27 December 2020 16: 22
        0
        Stepa! It's fashionable now ...
        1. Binder Offline Binder
          Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 18: 06
          -4
          Stepa should think about it - I'll buy him a beautiful cap, with the inscription צהל in yellow letters on an olive background. yes
    5. Bakht Offline Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 27 December 2020 19: 20
      0
      the then Kremlin leadership unequivocally provoked the Arabs to start a war with Israel

      But for some reason Israel attacked. I understand that there was disinformation, but this disinformation was not the cause of the war.
      1. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 20: 02
        -1
        Quote: Bakht
        But for some reason Israel attacked.

        Israel struck a preemptive strike against the Arab armies that were preparing to attack. It's like in the ring - a boxer sees that the opponent is preparing an attack and acting ahead of the curve. It is quite clear that this solution was the best in the situation then. I would venture to suggest that if the Red Army in 1941 were the first to attack the Wehrmacht, which was preparing for an attack on the USSR, then the course of the war could well have been different, and the casualties and destruction on the territory of the Union were much lower. However, Stalin lacked determination, unlike the leaders of Israel.
        1. Bakht Offline Bakht
          Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 27 December 2020 20: 17
          +2
          A bit wrong.
          First, a preemptive strike is an illegal undertaking.
          Second, if Stalin had delivered a preemptive blow in 1941, the defeat of the USSR would have become an accomplished fact.
          Third, Hitler called his attack on the USSR a preemptive strike. No need to apply his rationale.
          This is about the preemptive strike.

          About the influence of the media on state policy. Yes, the media sometimes plays the role of an arsonist and warms up the mood of the average masses. But the media are not currently controlled by the state. Not in America, not in Israel, not in the Russian Federation. The proof is the mass of anti-government publications in the Russian media.

          Regarding the 1967 war. Yes, the conscientious Foreign Ministry was sending some signals to Egypt. But it is also known that the USSR warned Nasser against attacking Israel. On May 26, the USSR ambassador to Egypt roused Nasser out of bed at three in the morning and read out a memorandum, where he called not to start a war. In May, Soviet advisers conducted an inspection of the Egyptian Air Force and Navy. The report was depressing. Their inability to fight was reported to Moscow.

          The decision to start the war in Tel Aviv was made on May 30 or June 1. There were several reasons for this. The main reason for the outbreak of hostilities was not the blockade of the Tyrrhenian Strait, but the defensive pact concluded between Jordan and Egypt. The responsibility for starting the war lies with all participants. Egypt is guilty more than others, as well as U Thant, and Jordan, and Iraq and .... Israel. In the end, it was Israel that did not allow the deployment of peacekeepers on its territory.

          There is no pure black or white light in nature. There are many shades of the spectrum.
          1. Bakht Offline Bakht
            Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 27 December 2020 20: 19
            +1
            Addition. Vysotsky was absolutely right when he wrote:

            Gamal Abdel, on all Nasser
          2. Binder Offline Binder
            Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 21: 09
            -2
            Quote: Bakht
            as for the preemptive strike.

            Your conclusions seem to me very controversial.

            Quote: Bakht
            Regarding the 1967 war.

            The USSR leadership sought to strengthen its influence in the Arab world, acting through its sponsors, primarily Egyptian President Nasser. A victory over Israel would undoubtedly increase its prestige among the Arab states and throughout the Islamic world. This was the main reason for the Soviet incitement to war. It was thanks to Soviet support that Nasser went to close the Tirana Strait, demanded the removal of the UN peacekeeping forces from the Sinai Peninsula and announced that he would host the victory parade in Tel Aviv. Shortly before the start of the war, the Minister of Defense of the USSR, Marshal Grechko, unambiguously promised the Egyptians direct intervention of Soviet troops in hostilities if difficulties arose. True, Grechko received a reprimand from Brezhnev for this, but no one was in a hurry to disappoint the Arabs. And about the shades - right. yes
            1. Bakht Offline Bakht
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 27 December 2020 21: 14
              +1
              The USSR certainly wanted to play some role in the Middle East. But he did not directly push for war. There are no such facts. Even in Western authors I have not found this. I do not use Soviet literature. Everywhere it is said quite clearly. The reason for the outbreak of war was the agreement between Jordan and Egypt. And also the introduction of 400 Iraqi tanks to Jordan. This was absolutely unacceptable for Israel.

              With regard to preventive strikes, these are not my conclusions, but generally accepted international documents. Preventive strikes are illegal.
  3. Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 27 December 2020 14: 43
    0
    Quote: 123
    In other words, the then Kremlin leadership unambiguously provoked the Arabs to start a war with Israel, being confident in the imminent victory of their wards over the hated Zionists. What this provocative behavior has resulted in is known to everyone today, do the current leaders of the Russian Federation really do not know history at all?

    And where does the leaders of the Russian Federation? belay Do you want to say that they are "pumping up" in the press? Do they want Iran against you and the Americans who are confident in its quick victory? The analogy is far-fetched, rather than a Faberge.
    Has the Russian leadership also sent your boat to the shores of Iran? Did they also lift American tankers into the sky?
    "Signals" are quite alarming, it is stupid not to notice them. Not so long ago, Russian planes were not allowed to fly over the Caspian Sea ... and a little later ... well, everyone knows.
    I wonder if your management knows the story? Does he make any conclusions for himself? Fortune is so capricious and changeable ...

    The pressure is obvious, but it is created by the media. They need stingy, excitement ... In fact, Israeli submarines are on duty there on a regular basis, and some bursts of American activity also happen several times a year. Nothing extraordinary happens as long as everything fits into the framework of military pressure on Iran.
    1. Diver d Offline Diver d
      Diver d (Oleg) 27 December 2020 15: 45
      0
      I totally agree, Alex) The press is trying their best to escalate the situation. This is their bread, when there are no shows, then you need to at least gather a crowd for the excitement and banal earnings. And it’s not surprising that the media is working hard to whip up. The situation as a whole fits into the usual actions. A few days later, on January XNUMX, it will be one year since the liquidation of General of the IRGC Soleimani, as well as promises to avenge Fakhrizade, the head of the nuclear weapons project in Iran. Preventive actions are taken to prevent attacks and provocations. It would be foolish to expect the army to do otherwise. The excitement is beneficial for the IRGC for rallying the shaken unity of the people against the background of the economic crisis, it is beneficial for Russia in the hope of raising the price of hydrocarbons and selling air defense systems, aircraft and other weapons. Therefore, I am not at all surprised by the appearance of provocative articles. It would be amazing if this did not happen.
    2. Binder Offline Binder
      Binder (Miron) 27 December 2020 15: 52
      -3
      Quote: AlexZN
      The pressure is obvious, but it is created by the media. They need stingy, hype ...

      In the 90s, the Russian media were really independent and could publish whatever their heart desires, but today in the Russian Federation there are other orders and I have no doubt that without direct instructions from above, such publications do not appear.
      1. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 27 December 2020 16: 00
        +3
        Of course, Israel knows better, no one argues ... drinks
    3. 123 Offline 123
      123 (123) 27 December 2020 16: 37
      +2
      The pressure is obvious, but it is created by the media.

      Injection, injection. What are we going to do with the facts? The military grouping is strengthening. The moment is convenient, later it will be more difficult to bomb Iran into the Stone Age. The arms embargo ends. In addition, the likelihood of an Iranian "answer" for the murdered scientist is also high.

      Nothing extraordinary happens as long as everything fits into the framework of military pressure on Iran.

      Cases of transition of pressure to bombing are not uncommon.
  4. Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 27 December 2020 18: 08
    -1
    Quote: 123
    The pressure is obvious, but it is created by the media.

    Injection, injection. What are we going to do with the facts? The military grouping is strengthening. The moment is convenient, later it will be more difficult to bomb Iran into the Stone Age. The arms embargo ends. In addition, the likelihood of an Iranian "answer" for the murdered scientist is also high.

    Nothing extraordinary happens as long as everything fits into the framework of military pressure on Iran.

    Cases of transition of pressure to bombing are not uncommon.

    An attack on Iran requires an order of magnitude more resources than currently in the region.
  5. Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 27 December 2020 18: 16
    -5
    Quote: boriz
    but requires from 400 to 000 population

    The error, of course, is 400 million - 600 million.

    The error is the entire post, containing nothing but stupidity.
  6. Shoot down the plane! Gentlemen, generals?
  7. Barmaley_2 Offline Barmaley_2
    Barmaley_2 (Barmaley) 29 December 2020 00: 37
    -1
    Another stuffing. How many of these have already been:

    Well fsё! Tomorrow already. For the open spaces, you know, are already the same ones. Or something has already flown there, and something else is in full swing, and the media began to sing another dirge in Iran.

    It is a fact that Iran was put in the Zu position and that it is in an extremely difficult position. It is necessary to answer. But he will hardly answer linearly, because he can get in the teeth with relish and technologically, he cannot compete in any way with the most powerful air forces and, in general, the armies of enemy countries in a remote conflict. Even if this opponent is one person and 10 times smaller in many ways. But to try to control the "response" from the Persians and to demonstrate that, they say, we are waiting and do not have to eat with the Jews too.
  8. PRAVDORUB_2 Offline PRAVDORUB_2
    PRAVDORUB_2 (المسلما المحب في الله) 29 December 2020 07: 18
    +1
    Quote: boriz
    Your cheap, meaningless jokes are already tired.

    And he is not capable of anything more .. His primitive humor at the level of the pelvis is really out of place as usual ... However, as well as his conclusions