Gazprom will have to find an answer to Poland's gas plans in Eastern Europe


Poland continues to squeeze Gazprom out of Europe whenever possible. This country has consistently opposed the supply of Russian gas through the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which should turn Germany into the largest regional hub. The fact is that Warsaw itself has similar ambitions and may well overtake Berlin. What gives reason to believe so?


Today it is Russia that is the key supplier of natural gas to Poland. The annual consumption of "blue fuel" in this Eastern European country is at the level of 15 billion cubic meters. Under a contract signed back in 1996, Gazprom is to supply up to 10 billion cubic meters per year, of which 8,7 billion - on a take-or-pay basis. The rest of the total consumption is covered by imports and domestic production. But Warsaw intends to radically change all this.

It is profitable for Poland to buy Russian gas, but a large policy... The Rubicon was the so-called Munich speech of Vladimir Putin, where the president sharply criticized the concept of a unipolar world under the dictates of the "hegemon" in the person of the United States. Among other things, the thesis about Russia's refusal to recognize the EU diktat in the energy sector was voiced there:

Russia is not opposed to agreeing on the principles of relations with the EU in the field of energy resources. The principles of the Energy Charter are generally acceptable, but the very essence of the Charter does not suit Russia.

In the West, Vladimir Vladimirovich was heard and made their own conclusions. In particular, Warsaw decided to get rid of its dependence on Gazprom for the supply of "blue fuel" by returning to the Baltic Pipe project. Through this pipeline, Poland will receive from Norway through Denmark up to 10 billion cubic meters per year, that is, it will be able to replace the volumes received from Russia. The contract with the domestic monopolist ends in 2022, and the Polish authorities do not intend to renew it. Instead, preparations have already been made for the construction of an alternative gas pipeline from Scandinavia, which will begin next summer and will end approximately by October 2022. Since no one is going to interfere with Warsaw, most likely, the "Baltic Pipe" will be able to work in two years by the beginning of the heating season, finally ousting "Gazprom" from the Polish market.

But these are not all problems. As you know, Warsaw has made a serious stake on LNG by building a receiving terminal in Swinoujscie. For the next two decades, Poland has contracted with several LNG suppliers from the USA and Great Britain, and its plans are not limited to its own consumption. The capacity of the existing terminal will be expanded to 7,5 billion cubic meters per year, plus a second floating LNG terminal is planned to be built in Gdansk. Its capacity can range from 4,5 billion cubic meters to 9-12 billion cubic meters per year through modular expansion.

It is expected that in the next ten years the consumption of "blue fuel" in Poland will grow to 29 billion cubic meters, but there will still be an excess of gas, which Warsaw intends to resell to its neighbors, turning its country into a regional hub. Thus, the construction of the GIPL (Gas Interconnection Poland-Lithuania) pipeline between Lithuania and Poland is being completed at an accelerated pace. It is assumed that it will become part of the infrastructure designed to diversify supplies in Eastern Europe. Theoretically, it can carry "Lithuanian" gas from the floating LNG terminal in Klaipeda in volumes of up to 1,9 billion cubic meters per year. As you know, Vilnius is very proud of its “energy independence from Russia”. However economic the efficiency of this project is so low that the scenario of supplies of "Polish" gas to Lithuania is more likely.

And not only there, Warsaw quite reasonably expects to enter the markets of neighboring Latvia, Estonia and Finland. Since Poland, as an ally, enjoys the most favored treatment of the United States, there is no reason to believe that it will not be able to carry out its plans. How Gazprom will answer all this is a big question.
Ad
The publication is looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 25 December 2020 13: 03
    +8
    There is no need to answer. The contract ends in 2022. So there is no need to renew it. Norwegian gas (is there any) plus LNG. Gas price will rise at the Dutch hub. And since many consumers are demanding a release from the oil basket and the Stockholm arbitration agreed with this, the prospects for Gazprom are not very bad. Poor prospects for the EU economy, but this should not worry GazProm.
    The price for the TTF hub in Holland is now about $ 150-160 per thousand cubic meters.
  2. SASS Offline SASS
    SASS (Sass) 25 December 2020 21: 37
    +1
    Empty, incompetent scribble for a fee ... and that's it ... the author is not in the subject.))
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Marzhecki Online Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 26 December 2020 08: 54
      0
      Oooh !!! So refute "competently" and reasonably, if "in the subject" wink
      1. oderih Offline oderih
        oderih (Alex) 26 December 2020 13: 24
        +1
        The question is in the pipe. Will the "beloved" brother let you build a pipe? This is ridiculous in today's reality. And in terms of LNG, look at the growth in our volumes. He and Novatek will crush the hegemon. It has long been proven that Gazprom is much more stable than shale producers
  3. boriz Online boriz
    boriz (boriz) 26 December 2020 00: 08
    +3
    So there is no official confirmation that joint venture and joint venture 2 have given permission to cross their routes.
    Norway's gas affairs are rather sad. The end result is that the Baltic Pipe (when and if it is built) will pump Russian gas to Norway.
  4. bratchanin3 Offline bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 (Gennady) 27 December 2020 14: 17
    +2
    Yes, listen to the author, so at the time of the "guard" to shout! Our LNG will be cheaper than the American one in any case, and the light has not converged like a wedge in Poland, especially since the Poles are no longer friends and cannot be traded with them.
  5. Dust Offline Dust
    Dust (Sergei) 1 January 2021 17: 29
    +1
    Poland is just an intermediary, whatever one may say. That she sells Norwegian or American but, reseller. She will NEVER beat Russia with intermediary gas. In the long term, this is a dummy. In Norway, gas reserves are being depleted, the American one is 25% more expensive than the Russian one due to transportation. The shale revolution does not justify itself either. Even in the United States, public organizations are sounding the alarm that mining is harmful to nature. It seems to me that the main supplier of gas to Southeast Asia is the United States. The gas market there has always been more expensive than in Europe. But, in the last ten years, Russia has been "climbing" with its gas to Southeast Asia. The USA really doesn't like it. So they decided to answer in Europe. Where Russia mainly sold gas.
  6. Sergey Demin_2 Offline Sergey Demin_2
    Sergey Demin_2 (Sergey Dyomin) 2 January 2021 08: 48
    0
    The author of this opus is aware of the cost of lng? In Lithuania, a terminal for receiving LPG was built now, they do not know where to rush because no one needs gas because it is ROAD, now the Poles are stepping on the same rake.