Sweden is eager to fight. A new Northern War awaits Russia?

The outgoing year, frankly speaking, did not add stability and peace to the life of mankind. Almost everywhere "old" military conflicts continued, and in some places new, fierce and bloody ones broke out. Alas, it cannot be said that the borders of our Fatherland are in peace and security - the war in the Caucasus, the alarming events in Belarus, the confrontation in the east of Ukraine, the sharp increase in NATO military preparations, which have a clear anti-Russian orientation in Poland and the Baltic states ...

It seems that threats in the Northern direction will soon be added to this alarming list. Once a mortal enemy of Russia, but the last two centuries coexisted with it without any problems and mutual claims, Sweden is sharply changing its course from good-neighborliness to confrontation. How far can this process go?

From war to peace and back

People of today's generations can hardly take Sweden seriously as our country's geopolitical enemy. Nevertheless, let me remind you that this was not always the case. In the list of countries with which our ancestors waged full-scale wars, this state occupies one of the first places. If we take into account only the conflicts in which Russia has participated since the times of the sovereigns Ivan III, Ivan IV, Fedor I and Alexei Mikhailovich, then there are a dozen of them. But if we add to those, as many historians do, fierce battles with those who tried to crush it under themselves and conquer the Swedes of the Novgorod Republic, then the number will probably double. The culmination of the Swedish-Russian confrontation was the Northern War, which Peter I waged for access to the Baltic. Ultimately, our opponents in it, although they added to the list of those who invaded the Russian lands with fire and sword, were completely defeated. Russia has finally turned into an empire, and Sweden has lost its ambition to become one.

However, attempts at armed revenge were undertaken by Stockholm up to the beginning of the 1939th century - with the same negative result for it. Ultimately, they, along with the results of past clashes, cost Sweden almost a third of its territory. From then on, the lesson seemed to have been learned. Nevertheless, the Swedes never missed any chances to spoil our country, albeit surreptitiously - during the Winter War of 11, out of 8 thousand foreign volunteers who fought against the Red Army on the side of the Finns, XNUMX thousand were Swedes. Yes, and military assistance in the form of supplies of weapons, ammunition and equipment Stockholm rendered Helsinki more than significant. During World War II, the Swedes seemed to be neutral, but ... Let's not forget that almost half of the Wehrmacht's weapons were made precisely of metal smelted from high-quality Swedish ore, which flowed into the Third Reich right up to 1945.

After the division of the world into two camps with centers in Washington and Moscow, as well as the creation of the corresponding militarypolitical blocs - NATO and OVD, Sweden announced that it will continue to adhere to a policy of neutrality. She, like Finland, rejected an offer to join the North Atlantic Alliance, of which Scandinavian Denmark and Norway became members. Yes, starting in 1994 Stockholm began to slowly be drawn into NATO's "orbit" - first becoming a member of the Partnership for Peace, then joining in one way or another to various missions of the Alliance in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Africa. And in 2014, at his summit in Wales, Sweden was “blessed” with the status of an “expanded partnership”. Nevertheless, over the past years, the country's military budget has been steadily reduced and the issue of full-fledged accession to NATO has not been raised in principle. Moreover, back in September of this year, Swedish Defense Minister Peter Hultkvist gave an interview to the German newspaper Allgemeine Zeitung, in which he clearly and clearly stated: Stockholm has no intentions or plans to join the North Atlantic bloc. The reason is simple - "unwillingness to increase tension in relations with Moscow."

Nevertheless, literally a couple of months later, the same Hultqvist began to say completely different things. It turns out that the "global security environment" has drastically changed and not for the better, of course. When did this happen? According to the head of the Swedish defense department - "after Russia's aggression against Georgia, the annexation of Crimea and the conflict in Ukraine." Also, Hultqvist is extremely concerned about "the modernization of Russian military capabilities, the conduct of very complex exercises by Moscow and the strengthening of its activity in the Arctic and the Baltic Sea zone." It’s a strange thing - it’s like not an Estonian, but a Swede ... Or is "late ignition" really a distinctive feature of gentlemen with a "persistent, Nordic character"?

Are 200 years of neutrality ending?

In fact, the Russian-Georgian conflict took place in 2008. Crimea returned to our country in 2014. Why did they swing for so long? Or is Mr. Minister still trying to "fit the problem to the answer", coming up with "grounds" for a sharp change in the country's course from neutral to anti-Russian and militaristic? I must say that a significant deterioration in relations between Stockholm and Moscow has been outlined literally in the last couple of years. Let me remind you of some moments from this sad chronology: at the end of February 2019, a certain citizen was detained in Stockholm, allegedly “recruited by Russian intelligence” and working for it. As a result, naturally, a diplomatic scandal erupted.

The fact that what happened was not an accident, but a new state position of Sweden, was evidenced by a voluminous report released just a month later by the counterintelligence service (SAPO) there, in which our country was directly accused of developing some kind of "gray zone doctrine" in which it allegedly "tries to act methods of propaganda, cyber attacks and takeover of strategic companies and technologies ”. The claims, of course, were copied with Scandinavian accuracy from the “senior comrades” - those Western countries that had already launched a frenzied information attack on our country during this period. This was followed by repeated demarches of official Stockholm, which increasingly began to see a threat in Russian military aircraft and ships, which, in fact, carried out completely ordinary sorties and campaigns. The situation was heating up gradually, but steadily. In July of this year, the general military duty, which had long gone into oblivion, was returned to the "neutral" country. The military budget of Stockholm from 2014 to the next 2021 increased by 85%! However, as it turned out, this is far from the limit.

In the future, the country's defense budget for the period from 2021 to 2025 should increase by another 40% and reach a volume of 89 billion kroons or 10,6 billion dollars. This will be a record for the past 70 years. Now Stockholm spends on the military, it needs about 1.1% of its own GDP, but at such a pace, you see, it will soon reach the 2% that Washington requires from its NATO partners. Corresponding changes are taking place in the country's armed forces - there is a rapid "muscle building". First of all, this is expressed in a sharp increase in the staff size of the army, which, according to existing plans, should practically double by 2030, reaching 90 thousand people against the current 55. It is planned to restore the previously disbanded military units, and the stable filling of these new units should ensure an increase in the number conscripts up to 8 thousand people annually, which, again, will double their current number.

Militarily, Sweden should be taken quite seriously - let's not forget that this country, unlike many others in the West, is fully self-sufficient not only with the simplest types of weapons and military equipment, but also with tanks, combat aircraft, and even warships and submarines ... One of the striking examples of the fact that everything that is happening is not empty words, was the deployment by the Swedish army of one of its units on the island of Gotland in the Baltic Sea, again directly linked by Stockholm with the "increased military activity of Russia in this area", which began to cause Swedish side "concern" since 2014. The Swedish military unit based on this Baltic island was disbanded in 2005. Now times have changed.

However, all this might not have looked so alarming yet if Stockholm had not recently begun to take more than real steps, indicating its desire to cross out the neutrality that lasted for two centuries (albeit at times purely on paper) and join the North Atlantic Alliance. Such actions, perhaps, cause much more concern than the formation of new regiments by Sweden and the increase in the cost of their maintenance. Last week, the local parliament, the Riksdag, voted in favor of a decision that effectively opens the way for the country to join NATO. It is about calling on the government to declare in law the possibility of joining the Alliance, which was previously denied in principle at the state level. This is not to say that this highly controversial decision was unanimous - it was adopted by a majority of 204 votes against 145.

Among those who, foaming at the mouth, argue that Sweden today “needs security guarantees that only NATO membership can provide” are representatives of the center-right parties there - the Moderate, Liberal, Center, and also Christian Democrats. The opponents of the North Atlantic aspirations of their colleagues have traditionally been parliamentarians from the Social Democratic and Left parties, as well as the “greens”. The incident lies in the fact that the current government of the country consists of representatives of these very political forces. The ideas of supporters of joining the alliance have already been sharply criticized by the head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry, Anna Linde, who said that such steps would lead to "negative consequences for the country's security."

Alas, as we know, in the countries of Europe, political coalitions and governments sometimes change at a truly kaleidoscopic speed. There is no guarantee that tomorrow in Stockholm those who are torn to "embrace" the North Atlantic bloc will not prevail. And, by the way, the Riksdag voted very amicably for a sharp increase in the army and inflation of the military budget. Without a doubt, such a turn of events does not bode well for Russia. First of all, due to the fact that in the near future the North, in particular the Arctic zone, promise to become an arena for a very tense confrontation between our country and NATO. The increase in the forces and resources of a potential adversary, especially at the expense of a Scandinavian state with a sufficiently developed military industry, should not frighten us, of course, but it definitely does not cause joy.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Stalnov I.P. Offline Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. (Stalnov Ivan Petrovich) 25 December 2020 10: 22
    Yes, Sweden provides itself with weapons, one question arises, when was Sweden last fought? It's one thing to run through forests and fields knowing. that you will not be soaked, but another thing is when "Hail and Whirlwind will strike." And now the prosperous Sweden, which has created socialism for its citizens, will find the strength to force its population to go to war, I think not. The fight can only be when, for example, Russia attacks Sweden, and this is one of the unthinkable deeds.
  2. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 25 December 2020 11: 08
    Ah, this is all envy of Swedish socialism.
    They do not have the Kremlin and Chubais. But there is a high standard of living, high taxes for the oligarchs, and a level of industry.
    And what will happen there in 10 years - even the GDP is unknown.
    1. DeGreen Offline DeGreen
      DeGreen 25 December 2020 18: 45
      Well, you don't have to lie. For the last 7 years, Sweden has been in deep trouble .... emigrants, and there are over 9 million of them, are pulling the country to the bottom. And you can go there. If you want.
      1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 25 December 2020 22: 24
        ... emigrants, and there are over 9 million ...

        As of 2019, the population of Sweden = 10 million 327 thousand 589 people. And "over 9 million emigrants" are included in the population?
        1. bulvas Offline bulvas
          bulvas (Vasiliy) 25 December 2020 23: 37
          Quote: Xuli (o) Tebenado
          As of 2019, the population of Sweden = 10 million 327 thousand 589 people. And "over 9 million emigrants" are included in the population?

          The newly formed Swedish Arab Party is calling on Swedes who do not value multiculturalism to renounce their citizenship and leave the country.

          On their official Facebook channel, they ask: The Arab Party is asking all Swedes who do not accept the value of diversity to renounce their citizenship and leave the country. You have nothing to do here, your Sweden, which you would like to return, is gone forever.


          What is NATO?
          They need an army to protect themselves from "multiculturalism"
          1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 26 December 2020 11: 14
            Rather than shedding crocodile tears about the "unfortunate Swedes", you'd better take care of the state of affairs in Maskvabad (it's hard to hear Russian in the metro) and in Maskvabad ulus :))
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
        2. DeGreen Offline DeGreen
          DeGreen 26 December 2020 02: 16
          0,9 million. Wrong.
    2. Valery Prokhorov (Valery Prokhorov) 26 December 2020 13: 46
      So what is the threat to Sweden? Surely someone wants to capture them?
      1. Andro Offline Andro
        Andro (Andrey Tsarazon) 28 December 2020 13: 55
        No one will capture Sweden with military loot, it will be captured by migrants, and this is inevitable.
  3. amateur Offline amateur
    amateur (Victor) 25 December 2020 12: 46
    I thought everyone saw this video. But it turns out that Mr. Necropny did not see him. drinks

    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Maxim Mironov Offline Maxim Mironov
    Maxim Mironov (Maxim Mironov) 25 December 2020 17: 53
    Shaw again "kemska volost"?)) And the video is good ... about "Swedish humor" ... so maybe these are their "preparations" this is their humor like that?))))
  5. Zelimkhan Offline Zelimkhan
    Zelimkhan (Zelimkhan) 25 December 2020 19: 35
    Sweden is not going to attack Russia. Sweden will wait for the beginning of the process of Russia's collapse, and then seize part of the territories, for example, part of the Leningrad region, the Pskov region and the Novgorod region. And the collapse of Russia is just a matter of time.
    1. DeGreen Offline DeGreen
      DeGreen 25 December 2020 21: 46
      What are you worried about? For Russia. You sit in Turkey and sit.
    2. Odessa Greek Offline Odessa Greek
      Odessa Greek (Greek) 25 December 2020 21: 50
      Do you say this as a representative of the already titular nation of Sweden? good Well, then in ten years from now there will be Sharia in Sweden! Work, brothers! wink
    3. Astronaut Offline Astronaut
      Astronaut (San Sanych) 25 December 2020 21: 53
      You will not wait, we will not repeat the mistakes of 91!
    4. Xuli (o) Tebenado 25 December 2020 22: 39
      ))) Why do they need it? Yasak collect? So the Middle Ages ended long ago, and in the 50-60s of the last century even Africa was liberated.
    5. bulvas Offline bulvas
      bulvas (Vasiliy) 25 December 2020 23: 34
      Quote: Zelimkhan
      And the collapse of Russia is just a matter of time.

      There have been so many of you awaiting the collapse of Russia over the past 1000 years, but where are you all?
      Already the cemeteries of dreamers about the collapse of Russia have disappeared from the face of the Earth.

      You ought to read the story, Zelimkhan, maybe you will stop fantasizing.
      Leave empty dreams to stupid girls.
  6. volhcovcepgei Offline volhcovcepgei
    volhcovcepgei (Cepgei Volhcov) 25 December 2020 22: 31
    In general, many countries, by the way close to sufficiency itself, are ready to leave NATO, it has already become clear to many that this deprives the country of security and, most importantly, self-sufficiency in their own actions. America's desire is understandable, they need combat "torpedoes", and most importantly, they themselves do not want to be. But that's not even the point, a NATO base in any country is a direct threat to the government of the country (in these closed territories a certain team is formed that is not controlled by the country of arrival) espionage, of all kinds, subversive work and the collection of incriminating data on government members, in particular, direct participation in the political life of the country, the production of all types of weapons of mass destruction and many other not pleasant things for the country. In itself, the increase in the army, and even the availability of decent weapons is the country's business. But don't turn into torpedoes for one-time use. But everything is much simpler, the United States is looking for a loophole to enter the territory that is closed for them, and first of all, the country on whose territory they set foot will suffer from this, and not only will there be no way out. The United States does not need a country with its own ambitions, and their goal is insultingly simple, to get their own site, of course the rest are superfluous, except that the service staff and torpedoes.
  7. Definitely - treat such subchiks with hydrogen!
  8. Vyacheslav34 Offline Vyacheslav34
    Vyacheslav34 26 December 2020 10: 16
    Sweden has always fought, the volunteer contingents of Sweden have always taken part in all hostilities It's just that the Swedes always closely watched what was happening and removed their military from dangerous places, places where they could be captured, especially after Joseph Vissarionovich stabbed their muzzle on the table at participation of the Swedish battalion in the Defense of Musta-Tunturi on the side of the Germans. There, they immediately found out everything, the counterintelligence of the army and navy and reported where it was necessary, and Stalin at the right moment pulled out the documents from the table and began to poke the Swedes into this table 10 millimeters below the table level.
    1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 26 December 2020 11: 27
      ... and Stalin at the right time pulled out the documents from the table and began to poke the Swedes into this table, and 10 millimeters below the table level ...

      )) But to them this "poking" in the depths of his soul was deeply violet and purely parallel.

      They offered their own version of building socialism, an alternative to Stalin's, and for many decades they have stung the eyes of fellow countrymen and admirers of Soso Vissarionych with their ugly high standard of living. And, unfortunately, Russia is not 10 mm below the buffet level, but much more.
  9. Seaman_2 Offline Seaman_2
    Seaman_2 (White Sea) 26 December 2020 10: 18
    Charles XII always treated the Russians who had the misfortune of falling into his hands with cold, immense cruelty. Contrary to the generally accepted rules of warfare at that time, the Swedes committed a number of war crimes.
    In the battle of Fraustadt, the incomprehensible, truly bestial cruelty of the Swedes was revealed against the Russians. Indeed, in this combined army of the Saxon General Schulenburg, which suffered such a defeat, there were Saxons, and Poles, and even the French who served in the Saxon army, and, finally, Russians. After its victory (February 3, 1706), the Swedish army took prisoners all who were not killed and did not have time to escape. Everyone except Russians!

    The Russians are also beaten, and which of the soldiers were taken to a full, and with those the enemy very mercilessly acted, according to the royal decree issued about them before, so that they do not give pardon (or mercy), and rudely put a person in 2 and 3 each on the other they pricked them with spears and baguettes (bayonets - E. T.). In this barbaric way, the Swedes exterminated 4 thousand disarmed Russian prisoners after the battle.

    - E. V. Tarle, "The Northern War and the Swedish Invasion of Russia"

    According to eyewitnesses, some of the Russian prisoners, trying to avoid execution, turned their uniforms inside out, with the red lining outward, trying to merge with the red uniforms of the Saxons, but this did not help: “upon learning that they were Russians, General Renschild ordered to bring them out in front of the line and shoot everyone in the head ; a truly pitiful sight! " Another eyewitness to the events said: about 500 Russian prisoners "were immediately shot and stabbed in this circle without any mercy, so that they fell on each other like sheep in a slaughterhouse."

    Against the background of the Swedes, the Turks were a model of nobility. Especially when our army, led by Pyotr Alekseevich, was released from the encirclement on the Prut with the very minimum promises on our part, without waiting for their fulfillment.
    1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 26 December 2020 11: 36
      ... when our army, led by Pyotr Alekseevich, was released from the encirclement on the Prut with minimal promises from our side ...

      Come on! There these promises to the Turks were there before the lantern. The king removed all the gold from his retinue and the queen, emerald diamonds and other sapphires up to a gold buckle from his own ports; this and the army treasury to the penny was given to the Turks (with special respect).
      1. Seaman_2 Offline Seaman_2
        Seaman_2 (White Sea) 27 December 2020 15: 49
        Well, this is all speculation. Yes, some gifts for the Sultan were given. Charles the 12th tried to accuse the Grand Vizier of bribery before the Sultan, but the investigation of the Grand Vizier justified. But, as for what you describe .... there are a lot of rumors, not a single proof. If you have solid PROOFS of your version - lay it out, let's look at them.
        So, the Grand Vizier did not take anything for himself, but released our army under the signed Treaty that we would return Azov to Turkey, dismantle the fortifications of the Taganrog fortress and would not keep our navy in the Black (Azov) Sea.
        1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 27 December 2020 18: 09
          The experience of local communication tells me that even when giving any evidence from the "partner" the words follow: "Well, this is all speculation."
          Therefore, I see no reason to grovel too much.
          1. Seal Offline Seal
            Seal (Sergey Petrovich) 29 December 2020 17: 26
            And the experience of local communication shows me that here all the promises to present evidence, as a rule, end with expressions similar to yours:

            Of course, I could calmly lay out a thousand proofs, but I do not see the point, since my proofs will not be taken seriously.
            1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 29 December 2020 18: 55
              ... all the promises to provide evidence ...

              1) Show me pzhsta not even everything, but at least one of my promises to present you with some evidence.
              2) In my opinion, a little higher I talked a little with Seaman_2 (White Sea), and below some Seal (Sergey Petrovich) appeared :)
              3) Looked up Seal in the dictionary: print; gasket; seal, cat, seal.
              Yep, you have low self-esteem :))

              Farewell my little mollusk!
              1. Seal Offline Seal
                Seal (Sergey Petrovich) 30 December 2020 09: 06
                There were no promises to me.
                But you stated:

                The king removed all the gold from his retinue and the queen, emerald diamonds and other sapphires up to a gold buckle from his own ports; this and the army treasury to the penny was given to the Turks (with special respect).

                To which your opponent respectfully asked you

                If you have solid PROOFS of your version - lay it out, let's look at them.

                Which is quite logical. If someone starred something without proof, anyone can ask the star to confirm it.
                However, yes, you really, as an experienced star, did not promise anything to anyone and immediately avoided answering. Into the mud. Apparently you are a real pro. In the sport, "who better not answer for his bazaar."
                And as I showed you this, you started to sort out my personal file. Also in the best demagogic traditions.
                So congratulations! Indeed, in your favorite sport "How to get away from answering for your bazaar" you have reached new heights.
                1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 30 December 2020 12: 54
                  If someone starred something without proof, anyone can ask the star to confirm it.

                  What are you talking about? Are you seriously sculpting this? You make me laugh :))
                  These comments are located under the opus of Comrade Neukropny. There are some numbers, and not a word is said, where did he get them from? Here you have your questions and ask him - where did you get this (this, this and this)? What is your evidence?
                  By the way, like Necropny, I will also intersperse my presentation with the words "similar", "perhaps", "it would seem", "like", "you look", "without a doubt" and so on, so that the seal pads are calm :)
                  1. Seal Offline Seal
                    Seal (Sergey Petrovich) 30 December 2020 14: 40
                    Let me decide myself who and what questions to ask me. If I want to demand confirmation of the words from Necropny, I will. In the meantime, I turned to you. I see that it is useless. You don't want to be responsible for your bazaar. This time you decided to hide behind the Necropny's back. : - ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ))))))
                    1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 30 December 2020 15: 38
                      I will explain on my fingers, as for the gifted:
                      1) Here we do not defend a thesis for a scientific degree. And not even the defense of my thesis at my native history department. This is not the right format to explain the choice of topic, to review sources and historiography, to provide arguments and evidence. Again, this is not even a "round table" meeting of scientists talking heads. Here - the usual Internet chatter on a given topic. No more.

                      2) Look at the title of the opus. There is about the modern defense policy of Sweden. There is not even half a word about the Prut campaign of Peter I. Therefore, this whole topic in this case is called off topic, which is not welcome on any site.
                      If I want to demand confirmation of the words from Necropny, I will.

                      You clearly overestimate your capabilities.
                      Seal (Sergey Petrovich) Today, 09:06
                      There were no promises to me.

                      And therefore your surname: "Free!"
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. Seaman_2 Offline Seaman_2
                      Seaman_2 (White Sea) 21 January 2021 23: 29
                      I haven't been here for a long time. Thank you colleague for your support. And my advice to you - do not answer this more, as you correctly noted, a bazaar woman with an almost abusive nickname, who does not want to be responsible for her bazaar. Believe me, it's like throwing pearls in front of you know who.
  10. Haiowenta oneida (Haiowenta Oneida) 27 December 2020 01: 11
    What rare Swedish with axes in the photo. No one else will send infantry and tank wedges against them, a lot of honor, to fight them with their hands. The war will be at a distance - if only they twitch in our direction, even the Swedes, even the Norwegians - will not have time to repent, as it will fly in and flatten, and on this Swedish "socialism" will end, there will be a continuous Swedish reserve.
    1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 27 December 2020 10: 25
      If tomorrow is war, the country will stir
      From Kronstadt to Vladivostok.
      The country will be stirred up, great and strong,
      And we will cruelly break the enemy.

      A plane will fly, a machine gun will be sharpened,
      Mighty tanks rumble
      And the battleships will go, and the infantry will go,
      And dashing tachanka rush.

      We do not want war, but we will protect ourselves, -
      We fortify the defense for a reason, -
      And in enemy land, we will crush the enemy
      Little blood, a mighty blow!

      And then there was "Finnish" ("Winter") with terrible losses in manpower ...
  11. associate professor_2 (Srul Solomonovich) 27 December 2020 16: 41
    So, explain to the guys that if something happens, we don't care where to drop nuclear warheads, we have a lot of them ... Enough for everyone ...
    1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 27 December 2020 17: 59
      Yeah, that's enough. No one doubts this.
      But then you will receive an answer.
      And even if it does not arrive, then you and your grandchildren will die within a couple of years from oncology caused by the fallout of radioactive ash from Sweden, over which your favorite atomic warheads will explode.
  12. Yuri Voronkin Offline Yuri Voronkin
    Yuri Voronkin (Yuri Voronkin) 27 December 2020 17: 33

    Swedish humor - "Is Sweden ready for an attack by Russian troops?"
  13. Dimon grin Offline Dimon grin
    Dimon grin (Dimon Grin) 28 December 2020 07: 34
    Until the first meeting with the Buratino flamethrower complex, then there will be an irresistible desire to return home to relatives, friends and girlfriends. And unlike Stalin, we will take a Swiss bank with us.
    1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 28 December 2020 21: 40
      And unlike Stalin, we will take a Swiss bank with us.

      Once again I am convinced how "deep" and intricately confused the train of thought of the local kraakl!
      Here and Buratino, and the Swiss bank "unlike Stalin" :))
  14. Dzafdet Offline Dzafdet
    Dzafdet (Sergei) 28 December 2020 10: 26
    In 2025, Sweden will become part of the USSR 2.0. So the Simpsons shows ....
  15. Ben latin Offline Ben latin
    Ben latin (Valentine Latin) 28 December 2020 10: 54
    .... why be surprised? Sixteen (16!) Wars and 13 defeats, from the beginning of the XIII to the middle of the XIX century, the Swedes with the Russians, not counting the comprehensive military assistance to Finland in the war against the USSR in 1939-1940. and participation on the side of Nazi Germany in 1941-45. in the SS "Nordland", "Totenkopf", SS "Wiking", SS "Nord", SS "Hohenstaufen", SS "Nederland" and the 33rd SS Grenadier Division "Charlemagne" ... Why be surprised if Sweden is with Russia is in a state of permanent war for 7 centuries? ...
    1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 28 December 2020 16: 40
      not counting the comprehensive military assistance to Finland in the war against the USSR in 1939 - 1940.

      Perhaps it will be a historical discovery for you, but in 1939-1941 Hitler's Germany and Stalin's USSR also exchanged "comprehensive military assistance."

      .... and participation on the side of Nazi Germany in 1941-45. in SS divisions

      There, on the side of Nazi Germany, were the ROA of the former Soviet General Vlasov and a horde of others, smaller.

      Why be surprised if Sweden and Russia have been in a state of permanent war for 7 centuries?

      Knowing the history of Russia, I personally am not surprised at anything: there are hardly any neighbors with whom Russia was not at war, and with some (Poland, Turkey) - again for centuries.
  16. Dmitry Frolov Offline Dmitry Frolov
    Dmitry Frolov (Dmitry Frolov) 30 December 2020 21: 11
    Photo 1. If you are a descendant of Vikings and a tough special forces soldier, then while posing with an ax, remove the protection from the ax blades, or are you afraid of cutting yourself?
  17. Rashid116 Offline Rashid116
    Rashid116 (Rashid) 31 December 2020 11: 26
    A lot of letters, I haven't read. And Sweden, where is it?)))
    1. Gogi bresner Offline Gogi bresner
      Gogi bresner (Gogi Bresner) 31 December 2020 17: 18
      and SHO is Sweden ???
  18. Gogi bresner Offline Gogi bresner
    Gogi bresner (Gogi Bresner) 31 December 2020 17: 18
    More "Zircon", less "Zircon" - this is not a problem for our industry.
  19. Ryzzard ewiak Offline Ryzzard ewiak
    Ryzzard ewiak (Ryszard Ewiak) 1 January 2021 14: 02
    What does renouncing neutrality mean for Sweden? In short, it is suicide. This time, a world war awaits us not only in name. The world will be taken from the earth and the "great sword" used (Revelation 6: 4). Jesus described him as follows: "φοβητρα τε και σημεια απ ουρανου μεγαλα εσται" - "Things are terrifying and extraordinary [related to unusual phenomena] from the sky [from the air] the mighty will”(Luke 21:11).
    Some ancient manuscripts contain the words of Jesus "και χειμωνες" - "and frosts."
    Aramaic Peshitta: "וסתוא רורבא נהוון" - "and there will be great frosts." Today we call it "nuclear winter".
    And in Mark 13: 8 there are also the words of Jesus: "και ταραχαι" - "and disorder" (in the sense of confusion and chaos).
    Aramaic Peshitta: "ושגושיא" - "and confusion" (about the state of public order).
    The use of these weapons will also cause significant tremors along and across regions, famines and epidemics (Luke 21:11).
    Jesus presented here the complete picture of the aftermath of a global nuclear war. This will not be "the end of the world." As predicted, it will still be “the beginning of labor pains” (Matthew 24: 8).
    Earlier, Jesus announced: “Also hear about wars and rumors of wars. See, do not be dismayed, for all this must be, but it is not yet fulfillment [τελος, first meaning: fulfillment, fulfillment] ”(Matthew 24: 6). Unlike the great wars of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the war that marks the end of an era (global nuclear war) will begin with an ethnic conflict: "People will rise against people" (like in 2008 in Georgia), and then "the kingdom on kingdom ”(Matthew 24: 7). This war will be a sign of the beginning of the end of this system of things.
  20. Seal Offline Seal
    Seal (Sergey Petrovich) 8 January 2021 13: 38
    Quote: Xuli (o) Tebenado
    And again, only your spouse can you grasp by the tongue, but such numbers do not work with me.

    I agree. You proved it brilliantly. With you numbers with the requirement to "answer for your bazaar" - do not pass. With which I congratulate you.