Why one Tesla today is like a dozen Gazprom

26

In 2008, Alexey Miller, the head of the largest Russian commodity corporation Gazprom, promised that in 7-8 years its capitalization would grow from $ 360 billion to one trillion. In 2020, the gas monopoly costs 4,63 trillion, but not dollars, but rubles, with a rate of over 73 "wooden" for an "American". At the same time, electric car manufacturer Tesla is listed on the stock exchange today as 12 Gazprom combined. Why has this become possible, and is it even worth drawing direct parallels between Russian and Western companies?

The car company of the American billionaire Elon Musk on the eve of the stock exchange was estimated at $ 608 billion, and at the maximum reached 616 billion. Not bad for a fledgling automaker that is continually predicting collapse by assorted experts and analysts. Tesla's capitalization is 28 times greater than the Russian Internet giant Yandex, 71 times that of the telecommunications giant MTS, and 13 times that of the oil company Lukoil. It is several times more expensive than any domestic company, whose shares are traded on the stock exchange; since the beginning of the year, its value has increased 7,6 times. What makes up the success of another project by Elon Musk?



At first, the American billionaire felt the spirit of the times very well when the green trend began. The European Union adopted the so-called "Green Deal", according to which, after 30 years economy The EU must stop depending on fossil fuels. China, which is one of the fastest growing markets for electric vehicles, is already following suit. In the United States, Joe Biden, proclaimed the winner of the presidential election, promises support for green projects and alternative renewable energy sources. Interest in environmentally friendly transport is growing rapidly, and Tesla got into what is called the jet.

SecondlyThe success of the venture, in which many initially did not believe, was decisively influenced by the charisma of the company's founding father. Elon Musk is, without exaggeration, a "PR genius" who can advertise and sell anything. He did not invent electric cars, but under him Tesla became the world leader in their sales, thanks to the "hype" he created. What is the idea of ​​sending an electric car into space, crazy at first glance? But in this original way, the American billionaire gave advertising to the whole world at once to two of his businesses. Today his company is investing heavily in developing its own advanced of technologies, which should improve the energy efficiency of this type of transport.

Thirdly, Tesla's inclusion in the S&P 500 index had an extremely beneficial effect on the growth of share prices. Someone might say that this is a bloated bubble that will soon burst. Indeed, there is some truth in this, the real value of the company is significantly lower than the market value. During the pandemic, all markets sank, and Tesla on the exchange lost 60% of its capitalization, but quickly recovered. This is an American dream in the flesh, a beautiful fairy tale that everyone wants to believe in, because the company easily solves its difficulties through additional rounds of attracting investments. This music will play for a very long time.

As for the relatively low cost of Russian companies, it is determined by a combination of factors. The domestic economy has a pronounced raw material nature, therefore, against the backdrop of a pandemic and a decrease in demand for hydrocarbons, the shares of Gazprom or Lukoil cannot please. In addition to this, our "national heritage" constantly gets from Western sanctions. It is also not entirely correct to compare Tesla directly with AvtoVAZ or KAMAZ, since the American company operates in a more high-tech sector. And in general, the total amount of money on the Russian stock market cannot be compared with the American and European markets.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    10 December 2020 15: 36
    Elon Musk is a prominent descendant of Jeff Peters and Andy Tucker. That's the whole secret.
    1. +2
      10 December 2020 15: 45
      That is, Roskosmos cannot compete with an ordinary swindler?
      1. 0
        10 December 2020 16: 57
        That is, Roskosmos cannot compete with an ordinary swindler?

        Can an honest manufacturer compete with a swindler?
    2. 123
      +3
      11 December 2020 01: 44
      Elon Musk is a prominent descendant of Jeff Peters and Andy Tucker. That's the whole secret.

      What is it like? Didn't he have a mother? belay
      1. +2
        11 December 2020 09: 42
        What is it like? Didn't he have a mother?

        Huh, behind the fashion. These are "Parent # 1" and "Parent # 2" drinks
        1. 123
          +3
          11 December 2020 15: 01
          So they would immediately say laughing
          drinks
  2. 123
    +4
    10 December 2020 15: 51
    For the period of its existence in 17 years, the company has just begun to make a profit (in my opinion, a year and a half without losses), one of the world leaders in capitalization ... You can not compare with KAMAZ, but for example with such a nondescript company like Tayota against the background of Tesla. View, compare, production and sales volumes, profit, and so on. You can also compare the explosive growth of the company's capitalization with the volume of "products" produced by the FRS. As soon as their money printer went off the chain, the capitalization of American companies began to grow by leaps and bounds.
    A sane person can have only one conclusion. All this is the result of abuse in the American-dominated financial market and Musk's close ties with financial tycoons.
    1. 0
      10 December 2020 16: 01
      You can not compare with KAMAZ, but for example with such a nondescript company as Tayota against the background of Tesla.

      Well, compare the first 17 years of Tesla's existence and the first 17 years of Toyota's existence :)

      Otherwise, it’s a little funny to compare a new company operating in a completely new (and therefore risky) market with a large concern selling a product that is in high demand a priori.
      1. 0
        10 December 2020 16: 24
        Financial markets in the current state are the arena of crooks for the rest of the suckers of the world ... When money replaced unsecured paper, and they issue as many trillions as they please, what suckers everyone else in the world seems to be ... But no matter how they trick, this scam is inevitable end .,
        1. +2
          10 December 2020 16: 27
          Adding. According to the Musk and Tesla firm, this is an obvious demonstrative trick for the same suckers. And the billions spent over a decade disappeared, if the first profits began a year ago, who covered huge billions of expenses, from what bounty they were - the answer is simple, from the printing press ...
          1. -5
            10 December 2020 16: 30
            According to the Musk and Tesla firm, this is an obvious demonstrative trick for the same suckers. And the billions spent over a decade disappeared, if the first profits began a year ago, who covered huge billions of expenses, from what bounties they were, - the answer is simple, from the printing press ...

            Your answer is not simple, but stupid.
            1. +3
              10 December 2020 16: 35
              Definitely, when there are no arguments to answer, only personal insults remain ...
              1. -4
                10 December 2020 16: 39
                Definitely, when there are no arguments to answer, only personal insults remain ...

                Arguments are given in response to arguments, not delusions. As soon as you stop carrying it, then I’ll think about speaking more reasonably.
                1. +1
                  10 December 2020 16: 53
                  Maybe not enough to understand what I am saying ... Therefore, you call misunderstanding delirium
        2. -2
          10 December 2020 16: 29
          But no matter how they trick, the end is inevitable for this scam ...,

          Yes, yes, yes, capitalism will finally decay, the dollar will collapse, aha.
      2. 123
        +2
        10 December 2020 17: 43
        Well, compare the first 17 years of Tesla's existence and the first 17 years of Toyota's existence :)

        I think Toyota did not have such a capitalization in the "first 17 years" laughing What does this comparison give you? We are comparing efficiency, profitability. As far as I understand, money is invested precisely for this. If anything,

        The net profit of the Japanese automaker Toyota Motor Corp. at the end of the 2019-2020 financial year (ended March 31) grew by 10,3%, amounting to 2,076 trillion yen ($ 19,5 billion), follows from the company's financial statements.

        I will not go into details, whether sales there fell due to the crisis or not, it does not matter. In general, this is a stable operating company that makes a profit. But it costs less. And why? The answer, but because Musk, as you put it, works "in a completely new (and therefore risky) market" is extremely unconvincing. After all, the risk of losing investments is greater. By the way, it's difficult to call it absolutely new, electric vehicles were made before it.

        Otherwise, it’s a little funny to compare a new company operating in a completely new (and therefore risky) market with a large concern selling a product that is in high demand a priori.

        A priori? belay Sale for 2019. Tesla - 304 783 pcs. Toyota - 8 578 155 pcs. It sells fewer cars than the Toyota RAV4.
        The answer to the question - why is this company so expensive? Well, you know ... the company is young .... the market is risky .... Any investor would send you along with the company to a well-known address. But the picture is the opposite.
        Conclusion in the first comment.
  3. +2
    10 December 2020 16: 10
    The capitalization of Gazprom will become high only after Gazprom begins to carry out full gasification of the population and enterprises of Russia. Why he doesn't do this is hard to say. He probably doesn't need high capitalization ...
    1. -2
      10 December 2020 17: 08
      Why he doesn't do this is hard to say.

      Why he doesn't do it is easy to say! Who will pay for this? Gazprom itself (for its own money) will not do this, and the state of Russia does not allocate money for this. Here is a pipe to Europe (for their money) - pzhlasta! To China (for the money of the Russian treasury) - pzhlsta! But for your own and in Russia - you will not wait !!!
      1. 123
        +2
        10 December 2020 17: 51
        Why he doesn't do it is easy to say! Who will pay for this? Gazprom itself (for its own money) will not do this, and the state of Russia does not allocate money for this. Here is a pipe to Europe (for their money) - pzhlasta! To China (for the money of the Russian treasury) - pzhlsta! But for your own and in Russia - you will not wait !!!

        Are you saying that the Europeans are not investing anything in Nord Streams? As for China, we are building here, the Chinese are building on their territory. Do you think it should be different?
    2. 123
      +2
      10 December 2020 17: 48
      The capitalization of Gazprom will become high only after Gazprom begins to carry out full gasification of the population and enterprises of Russia. Why he doesn't do this is hard to say. He probably doesn't need high capitalization ...

      I doubt it. Do you think Gazprom shares will go up if it is closely involved in the gasification of the country?
      1. +2
        11 December 2020 09: 35
        Of course! The country will begin to develop economically and the people will have money for shares, including Gazprom. You just need to take costs and payments under strict control. And what kind of development in the country, if the people heat the stove with wood, as in the 19th century? Development of the 19th century will be without gasification. Remember GOERLO and how the country began to develop with it!
  4. +3
    10 December 2020 18: 34
    The author of the article, forgive me, does not understand anything about IPO and banal lobbying. But, on the other hand, he can write quickly and on all topics.
    1. -6
      11 December 2020 07: 53
      The author understands a lot of things, apparently more than yours. And yes, he can write well on these topics.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    11 December 2020 07: 47
    Words, words, diarrhea of ​​words ..... Evaluation of success is done in rubles or dollars, that is the question? If the ruble is more than 70 times cheaper than the dollar, thanks to well-thought-out speculation on the stock exchanges, then it cannot be otherwise. Our fighters and missiles are cheaper than American ones, but not several times. And if we estimate it in rubles. Here is the answer.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +2
    15 December 2020 15: 50
    Because Tesla's capitalization is not the cost of its machines and equipment, but the cost of securities on the stock exchange. As many investors say, Tesla's price is more a contribution to an idea, rather than a real market value. History knows many inflated bubbles. And most of them burst ...
  8. 0
    17 December 2020 20: 25
    Quote: Cyril
    You can not compare with KAMAZ, but for example with such a nondescript company as Tayota against the background of Tesla.

    Well, compare the first 17 years of Tesla's existence and the first 17 years of Toyota's existence :)

    Otherwise, it’s a little funny to compare a new company operating in a completely new (and therefore risky) market with a large concern selling a product that is in high demand a priori.

    and what, Tesla works in a warehouse, and its products are not in great demand?