Air defense of Israel brought into full combat readiness against the background of a probable war with Iran


Senior Israel Defense Forces officers have held talks with the United States Armed Forces Central Command in the past few days to coordinate joint action in the event of an Iranian strike. Tehran threatens to attack Israel for its involvement, from the Iranian point of view, in the assassination of leading Iranian nuclear physicist Mohsen Fahridzadeh on November 27, Breaking Defense writes.


According to media reports, the IDF has reached a very high-quality level in protecting the territory of Israel from possible air attacks, which could be carried out by the pro-Iranian Lebanese movement Hezbollah or the Yemeni Houthis. The air defense systems of the Israeli army at all levels - tactical, operational and strategic - are brought to full combat readiness and are able to repel the onslaught of the enemy.

It is assumed that the Yemeni Houthis may carry out an attack against Israel. Previously, these armed formations fired at the territory of Saudi Arabia using Iranian-made Quds-1 cruise missiles. However, their range is not enough to hit targets on the territory of the Jewish state. Nevertheless, Iran has in its arsenal much more long-range missile launchers, such as Meshkat or Soumar, capable of covering a distance of 2000 km. It is possible that these weapons are already in the hands of the Houthis.

If an armed conflict is initiated, Tehran will face fierce resistance from the Israelis. According to Israeli analyst Uzi Rabi, Iran is unlikely to launch a large-scale attack on Israeli territory while Donald Trump holds the presidency in the United States, since Iran's aggression could provoke a powerful American strike on this country.

Rabi believes the Iranians can use their people in Iraq to attack American targets. To counter this, the United States brought the forces of its Iraqi contingent in a state of full combat readiness. In addition, the American aircraft carrier Nimitz is returning to the Persian Gulf, accompanied by a group of warplanes.
  • Photos used: IRNA
Ad
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Binder Offline Binder
    Binder (Miron) 4 December 2020 19: 00
    -9
    Persians would have to think hard before trying to attack Israel - the consequences of such a rash move for their country could be disastrous. The Israelis do not have hostile feelings towards the people of Iran, as well as towards any other people on the planet, but they will resolutely resist the aggressor who has infringed on the security of the State of Israel, the lives and well-being of its citizens. It is to provide protection against attacks by all types of missile weapons that a multi-level missile defense system of the Jewish state has been built, which really has no analogues in the world. I think that despite the extremely aggressive ideology of Islamic fundamentalism, the Ayatollahs will not dare to attack Israel, taking into account the IDF's capabilities, capable of delivering a crushing blow to the aggressor, to hit any object on its territory.
    1. Sergey Tokarev Offline Sergey Tokarev
      Sergey Tokarev (Sergey Tokarev) 4 December 2020 21: 00
      +4
      No one can call Israel without the United States. Iran and the Palestinians have more missiles than the Jews can digest ... the bandits have already agreed on soap and handbags. Jewish exclusivity always ends in the same way. Khmelnitsky was not enough, Hitler was not enough and the continuation of the banquet is required?
      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
        Cyril (Kirill) 4 December 2020 21: 05
        -4
        Without the United States, Israel successfully fought off the attacks of the coalition of Arab states, which had a significant advantage both in manpower and in technology (which at that time was the most modern - Soviet).
        1. Sergey Tokarev Offline Sergey Tokarev
          Sergey Tokarev (Sergey Tokarev) 4 December 2020 21: 10
          +3
          USA finances Israel so don't say .. and the Arabs are corrupt in places
          1. Cyril Offline Cyril
            Cyril (Kirill) 5 December 2020 07: 07
            -4
            Once again: Israel successfully withstood all the warriors with the Arabs alone until 1973 - it was since then that its cooperation with the United States began.

            And no, the Arabs are not corrupt - just Israel fought better.
            1. Dear sofa expert. 5 December 2020 13: 34
              +5
              Israel successfully withstood all the warriors with the Arabs alone until 1973 - it was from then that its cooperation with the United States began.

              Not true)

              After the revolution in Iraq in 1958 and the virtual collapse of the Baghdad Pact, the Dwight D. Eisenhower administration made the strategic decision to renegotiate relations with Israel, relying on the Jewish state as the main partner of the United States in the Middle East. This was reflected in the strengthening of military and political cooperation between the countries. Relations that had begun to revive were clouded by the report of the US State Department on the presence in Israel of a nuclear research center in Dimona, built with the help of France. Until the beginning of the 70s. American observers repeatedly visited the nuclear center until the American side followed the actual recognition of Israel's nuclear potential.

              Well:

              In May 1961, the new American president met for the first time with the Israeli prime minister, John F. Kennedy and David Ben-Gurion, respectively. In early 1962, the countries signed a treaty on the extradition of criminals, and on December 27 of the same year, President Kennedy announced a "special relationship" between the United States and Israel in the Middle East and the supply of military equipment to Israel.

              President Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, has steadfastly supported the course of the previous president. In 1964, the first official visit of the Israeli Prime Minister (Levi Eshkol) to the White House took place. Until the start of the Six Day War, France was the main supplier of weapons to Israel, but since the early 60s. The United States increasingly pushed the French out of the Israeli arms market. Starting with the supply of exclusively defensive weapons, for example, the MIM-23 Hawk, by the mid-60s, the United States began to supply offensive weapons as well. In addition, the United States contributed to the receipt of West German weapons supplied to Israel under the compensation agreement.

              Wiki
      2. Binder Offline Binder
        Binder (Miron) 4 December 2020 21: 13
        -6
        Quote: Sergey Tokarev
        do you need a continuation of the banquet?

        That banquet is over once and for all, now we bank and our enemies grieve. drinks
        1. Sergey Tokarev Offline Sergey Tokarev
          Sergey Tokarev (Sergey Tokarev) 4 December 2020 21: 17
          +5
          just on trifles near synagogues Jews in Europe shoot back and so a continuous holiday ... thanks to people like you, nationalism walks around the planet and turns into Nazism.
          1. Binder Offline Binder
            Binder (Miron) 4 December 2020 21: 21
            -7
            Who would have said about executions in Europe - in Russia Muslims slaughter and shoot hundreds from Moscow to the very outskirts ...
            1. Sergey Tokarev Offline Sergey Tokarev
              Sergey Tokarev (Sergey Tokarev) 4 December 2020 21: 25
              +6
              if you don’t know, then I live in Russia, I’m Russian and at the same time a Muslim ...
              1. Binder Offline Binder
                Binder (Miron) 4 December 2020 21: 39
                -6
                Quote: Sergey Tokarev
                I am Russian and at the same time a Muslim.

                It's like in that joke about a Jew in a bath - either remove the cross, or put on panties. laughing
                1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 4 December 2020 20: 19
    -6
    - With a massive attack of several hundred ballistic missiles, the ABM saturation threshold will be reached and hundreds of missiles will pass through the Israeli missile defense system to their targets. Israel and (probably) the United States will strike at nuclear and missile industries, command centers, military and government facilities, but no one will bomb the residential areas of Tehran ...
  3. Tamara Smirnova Offline Tamara Smirnova
    Tamara Smirnova (Tamara Smirnova) 4 December 2020 20: 56
    +2
    from the Galilee killers, along with the same mattress killers, they hope that they will not have to answer for their crimes. In vain.
    1. Binder Offline Binder
      Binder (Miron) 4 December 2020 21: 17
      -3
      Madam, before you dream about how you will call the Israelis and the Americans to account, first, sort it out with a tribute to the Chechen bandits, otherwise it's a shame and shame ...
      1. Tamara Smirnova Offline Tamara Smirnova
        Tamara Smirnova (Tamara Smirnova) 4 December 2020 21: 23
        +7
        Typical Jewish behavior:
        - answer a question with a question;
        - change the subject, especially if you have nothing to argue.
        Do not change, because of this, neither from Gail, nor the mattress will be known to the whole planet, killers will not cease, and this is shame and shame.
        1. Binder Offline Binder
          Binder (Miron) 4 December 2020 21: 43
          -5
          You, madam, have a typically feminine logic - the Israelis have alerted air defense and missile defense systems to counter a possible Iranian attack, and not vice versa. Iranians threaten to destroy Israel, so who are the killers?
          1. Tamara Smirnova Offline Tamara Smirnova
            Tamara Smirnova (Tamara Smirnova) 4 December 2020 21: 49
            +7
            well, of course, the "innocent" Jews, eternally persecuted and wrongly accused by all. Just think, the Iranians were killed a little, but they were immediately offended.
            1. Tramp1812 Offline Tramp1812
              Tramp1812 (Tramp 1812) 5 December 2020 02: 33
              -2
              Quote: Tamara Smirnova
              well, of course, the "innocent" Jews, eternally persecuted and wrongly accused by all. Just think, the Iranians were killed a little, but they were immediately offended.

              Why a little bit. In Syria, dozens of them are sent in bulk to the Huria by the IDF one time after another. The Persians are silent. Because there is nothing to say. The question of who liquidated Fakhridzadeh remains open. Iran's speculation about an Israeli trail is not supported by evidence. It seems that Tehran itself does not know how the operation to eliminate the nuclear engineer was carried out. The versions contradict one another. Iran currently has no allies, the economy of this country is not in the best condition due to sanctions and the fall in oil prices. In all respects, the Iranian army does not make a particularly formidable impression. No, they will not risk it. Is that to arrange some kind of terrorist act against Israeli targets, or citizens abroad. And even then, if they can. But it is their right to be offended. Let them take offense, but only quietly.
              1. boriz Offline boriz
                boriz (boriz) 6 December 2020 23: 48
                +2
                The question of who liquidated Fakhridzadeh remains open.



                Yes, no one really hides. Right from the beginning of the video.
  4. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 4 December 2020 23: 45
    -3
    What kind of nonsense is there - what kind of missiles with a range of 2000 km does Iran have? It has a (small) number of ballistic missiles capable of covering 2000 km of the Shihab-3 type, but they are few and they are located exclusively in Iran. km, only the United States and Russia have.
    1. Kristallovich Offline Kristallovich
      Kristallovich (Ruslan) 5 December 2020 08: 58
      +1
      What nonsense is there

      I support. You have made excellent nonsense ..
      1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 5 December 2020 10: 08
        -6
        No, it was the author who scribbled delirium. If there is no concept of the subject, why expose yourself to ridicule?
        1. Kristallovich Offline Kristallovich
          Kristallovich (Ruslan) 5 December 2020 10: 23
          +1
          If there is no idea about the subject

          Where did you get the idea? Do you have access to classified intelligence information? Or is there a man in the IRGC?
          1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
            Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 5 December 2020 10: 34
            -5
            Even the information available for those interested in the subject is enough to determine that the article was written by a layman who has no idea about the subject, but who read a couple of headings in yellow editions.
            1. Kristallovich Offline Kristallovich
              Kristallovich (Ruslan) 5 December 2020 10: 57
              -1
              Even available information

              What makes you think that this information is true?
              1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
                Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 5 December 2020 14: 56
                -4
                From the fact that I take it not from yellow garbage dumps, but from serious sources like Military Review and similar publications.
                1. Kristallovich Offline Kristallovich
                  Kristallovich (Ruslan) 5 December 2020 15: 14
                  +1
                  And Military Review takes information from, as you put it, "yellow garbage dumps", because there is nowhere else to take. All information is unofficial, partially thought out, corrected and modified a thousand times.
                  1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
                    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 5 December 2020 16: 16
                    -4
                    These are just your guesses that have nothing to do with reality. Serious publications take information from sources that are trustworthy (and they have them), therefore they are authoritative. But the yellow garbage dumps are looking for something more sensational and very illegible in the sources, and they think out a lot and just suck it out of the finger.
                    1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
                      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 5 December 2020 16: 22
                      -3
                      As for this article, then the author did not even bother to provide links to his blizzard about Iranian KRs capable of overcoming 2000 km - so, I read it is unknown where Iran has such super KRs and passed it off as a fact. He only refers to Breaking Defense is that Iran is threatening Israel. So it has long been no secret :)))
                      1. boriz Offline boriz
                        boriz (boriz) 5 December 2020 18: 23
                        +3
                        And most importantly - remember that until 2015. The caliber flew only up to 300 km, and then, suddenly ...
                        So, we wish you optimism.
                      2. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
                        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 6 December 2020 16: 45
                        -1
                        Yes, we are always optimists, and in general, at one time the chief of the General Staff of Israel said that an attempt by Iran to attack Israel with unconventional weapons would be the end of the Persian civilization. It will not rust behind us. So you have no doubts.
                      3. to4.ru Offline to4.ru
                        to4.ru (DOT RU) 6 December 2020 17: 01
                        0
                        And if we assume that after the first massive blow by Iran, Israel will cease to exist?
                      4. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
                        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 6 December 2020 17: 06
                        +1
                        With the same success, it can be assumed that after the first massive US strike, Russia will cease to exist, except that the fact is that Iran does not yet have nuclear weapons, and if there is information that it is about to appear, it will be the same as in Iraq in 1983 or in Syria a little later, when an almost finished reactor was demolished. With Iran, it is more difficult, but quite capable. And in general, so that there is no temptation to "first massive strike", in the Persian Gulf, submarines equipped with CD with special ammunition are constantly on duty. According to Western experts. , one such ammunition carries about 10 Hiroshima.
                      5. boriz Offline boriz
                        boriz (boriz) 6 December 2020 19: 10
                        +2
                        In fact, no one needs to destroy you by armed means. This is not a special problem, but the country is very shallow, there will be shit around ...
                        You are only holding on to the support of the Jewish section of the Finintern. As soon as it is gone, you will have serious problems. No one doubts that the world will be divided into zones of influence between REAL countries (unlike, even, the beginning of this year). As a result, you will find yourself in a blockade, which Iran has never dreamed of in a nightmare.
                        You, for a short history of existence, honestly earned a reputation as a petty, impudent scumbag. At the same time, you have nothing that other countries could not do without. A country or two countries - the heads of neighboring regions will simply give "their" command not to buy anything from you and not to sell anything to you. Everything will be humane and democratic. No one will touch you with a finger. You are not Iran and you will not live on your own. The perimeter is small, control of the blockade is not a problem.
                        A year will not pass, you will get into a knee-elbow position, surrender your nuclear weapons and you will live and breathe, as you are told. It is unlikely that you will like it, but here ...
                        And the neighbors are unlikely to treat you well ...
                        Yes, and when you decide to run, each to his historical homeland, you are unlikely to succeed. Nobody needs you.
                      6. Tramp1812 Offline Tramp1812
                        Tramp1812 (Tramp 1812) 6 December 2020 21: 28
                        0
                        Quote: boriz
                        In fact, no one needs to destroy you by armed means. This is not a special problem, but the country is very shallow, there will be shit around ...
                        You are only holding on to the support of the Jewish section of the Finintern. As soon as it is gone, you will have serious problems. No one doubts that the world will be divided into zones of influence between REAL countries (unlike, even, the beginning of this year). As a result, you will find yourself in a blockade, which Iran has never dreamed of in a nightmare.
                        At the same time, you have nothing that other countries could not do without. A country or two countries - the heads of neighboring regions will simply give "their" command not to buy anything from you and not to sell anything to you. Everything will be humane and democratic. No one will touch you with a finger. You are not Iran and you cannot live on your own. The perimeter is small, control of the blockade is not a problem.
                        A year will not pass, you will get into a knee-elbow position, surrender your nuclear weapons and you will live and breathe, as you are told.
                        Yes, and when you decide to run, each to his historical homeland, you are unlikely to succeed. Nobody needs you.

                        The publication is, in fact, about bringing Israel's air defense system to heightened combat readiness. Opinions were divided on the website about Iran's ability to launch a missile strike on Israel. You are replacing the subject of discussion. And without any proof, without even naming a country or a country that, as you say, are capable of putting our country in a "kneeling position", you say that the Jews of Israel will not even be able to escape. Let's go in order. The threat of a missile strike on Israel from Iran, as for me, of course exists. Who would argue? Otherwise, why bring Israel's air defenses to full combat readiness, which is quite costly. On the other hand, Iran is not in a position to take risks. Above, I referred to the reasons. I repeat that war is the continuation of the economy by other means. And with this, Tehran is doing very badly. Therefore, despite promising developments, there are very few missiles capable of reaching Israel. On the other hand, the Israeli Air Force is the third in the world in terms of quantity and second in the fighters of the latest generation. And there are also missiles in Israel capable of carrying nuclear warheads. And the air defense is multilevel. Now about your calculations about the uselessness of Israel about its "blockade." First, about the uselessness. GDP of nine million Israel in 2019 -405 billion dollars. Per capita -22 place in the world. Compare with the GDP of 150 million Russia and its immense territory.
                        I am giving you a link so that you have some idea of ​​Israel's economic power. In Russia, by the way, are drones delivering pizza to your home?

                        Now about the blockade. First. Name such an initiator. Maybe Lebanon? No? Then Iran? Yah! Then Syria, Afghanistan? Germany, USA, Russia, China .... Who? Second. When? And then you are completely vague. Apparently everything will start on Thursday. Without specifying the date and hour. Well, are you so angry?
                      7. boriz Offline boriz
                        boriz (boriz) 7 December 2020 00: 00
                        +2
                        Name such an initiator.

                        There will be four zone heads. USA, China, Russia, India. These are obvious and basic.
                        There may be options based on the results of the power struggle in the United States.
                        After dividing the zones, the first thing the heads of the zones will do (put yourself in their place) will take away nuclear weapons from the rest. It is obvious. Who will refuse - blockade, deprivation of markets. Particularly stubborn will be thrown onto the infrastructure with a couple of charges. The rest will be like silk.
                        The economic level does not bother anyone, especially the crookedly calculated GDP. Listen closely to Merkel. She knows what's more important.

                        https://topcor.ru/17518-times-vremja-putina-na-ishode-ego-sistema-poterpela-neudachu.html

                        In one of my comments to this post, I quoted a quote from Merkel's vision of this problem.
                      8. Tramp1812 Offline Tramp1812
                        Tramp1812 (Tramp 1812) 7 December 2020 01: 24
                        -1
                        There will be no "zones". For the reason already indicated by V. I. Lenin: the struggle for the redistribution of the already divided world, markets for the sale of sources of raw materials. Hitler tried to crush and control the world according to your patterns. And how did it end? Now, specifically for the countries you specified.
                        For the same India, one of the main suppliers of weapons is Israel. A lot of Israel's know-how is implemented in China, because there the cost of labor is cheaper, and, accordingly, lower production costs. In terms of startups, and in absolute numbers, Israel ranks second in the world after the United States. This is the question of Israel's "unnecessary". The world has long been globalized and dividing it strictly into zones of control between several countries is the same as creating a "perpetum mobile". If I understood you correctly, not economic factors, but the military component of countries will determine the status of "watching" (I cannot choose another term) on the planet ". You indicated them: USA, RF, India, China. So you want. Now look at the military spending of these countries. And compare the military spending with the military spending of other countries "not looking." And if you take Israel, which you hate, then compared to the Russian Federation, the difference in military spending is very small, given the number of armies of the two states. In the Russian Federation -65 billion, in Israel 20.5 billion. In Iran, if memory serves, -12 billion. And if you look at the military spending of Germany, France, South Korea, Japan and other countries, they are practically the same as in the Russian Federation ... Israel, by the way, is in 15th place in the world in terms of military spending. And Iran and Russia, all other countries and would be happy to increase military spending. But you can only get out of your pocket what is there.
                        However, take a look at the official table of military spending for all countries of the world.

                        And the last thing. Your vision of the planet as a GULAG with its zones and "beholders" is not new. There are even specific authors who publish their own works in this regard. And in the genre of fantasy.
                        M. Kalashnikov: "The Broken Sword of the Empire", for example. But this is not serious.
                  2. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
                    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 7 December 2020 00: 26
                    0
                    The same sad nonsense that has nothing to do with reality. You are also ignorant, it turns out. You do not even know how many years Israel has lived (and not bad at all) under a FULL Arab embargo. Moreover, most countries adhered to it. Now Arabs, one after another, conclude peaceful agreements with Israel - they finally realized that it is better to be friends with Israel. Yes, and about the "not a special problem" - in 1967 and especially in 1973, Israel defeated 5 united Arab regular armies, fully and comprehensively supported by the "great-mighty" And he himself took part and received as a bonus many 200s and a political defeat. At the same time, no one fought for Israel. No, I understand, of course, that you are an ignoramus and did not know this, but someone should have enlightened you a little , otherwise all that was in your head was a conspiracy on the topic of "financial" Although it is unlikely that the horse feed. Continue to dream of how we will run. There are many of them. Israel has existed for longer than the USSR, which, yes, did fall apart. but you pr lend to dream, because how do you admit that you are an ignoramus who does not know basic things? :)))
      2. Kristallovich Offline Kristallovich
        Kristallovich (Ruslan) 5 December 2020 17: 28
        +1
        CSIS. One of the most respected defense and security think tanks in the world.

        https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/soumar/

        Range: 2,000-3,000 km
        1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 6 December 2020 16: 42
          -1
          Iran does not have such a radius of CD. Ballistic missiles - yes, albeit in small numbers, but cruise missiles of such a radius are only in Russia and the United States.
        2. Kristallovich Offline Kristallovich
          Kristallovich (Ruslan) 6 December 2020 17: 39
          +2
          You demanded a serious source, I gave it to you. You, for your part, did not give any reasons. The usual verbiage, of which there are many.
        3. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 6 December 2020 19: 05
          0
          Well, I'll come back from duty and give arguments refuting the blizzard that Iran has a CD that can cover 2000 km (not to mention 3000 - no one has such in service yet). It is problematic with a smartphone, and working computers are blocked for many sites , including this one. You look, someone else turns out to be verbiage.
        4. Kristallovich Offline Kristallovich
          Kristallovich (Ruslan) 6 December 2020 19: 31
          0
          not to mention 3000 - no one has such weapons yet

          Read about the Kh-55SM
        5. boriz Offline boriz
          boriz (boriz) 6 December 2020 20: 14
          +1
          not to mention 3000 - no one has such weapons yet

          And then there is the x-101/102.
        6. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 7 December 2020 00: 08
          0
          A lot of things are in development, but we are talking about what is in service
  • magma Offline magma
    magma (Tatyana) 6 December 2020 08: 55
    -2
    Even the information available for those interested in the subject is enough to determine that the article was written by a layman who has no idea about the subject

    If my memory serves me, you work in the hospital. So your business, excuse me, is the contents of the chamber pots (in medical terminology - analyzes), and you tell us about rockets and laymen ...

    I remember "At home among strangers ...":

    Where are you going, Vanyaev
    1. Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 6 December 2020 16: 40
      0
      And, as I understand it, you are a great military specialist?
  • Natan bruk Offline Natan bruk
    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 5 December 2020 10: 31
    -6
    And Iran's statements about the new super-duper KR, capable of covering 2000 km from the same opera as the "5th generation fighter" "Gadir" presented a few years ago. Specialists were tearing their tummies for a long time, looking at this miracle. There is no equal. The regime of crazy ayatollahs is an evil Pinocchio itself. It suffers huge losses from sanctions, it loses a lot of people in Syria and other places for the sake of its cannibalistic Islamist principles. Would take the example of the Arabs - they eventually got a taste that there is no point in fighting Israel after another they conclude contracts with him and get very tasty buns for this.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Dmitry Donskoy Offline Dmitry Donskoy
    Dmitry Donskoy (Dmitry Donskoy) 5 December 2020 09: 38
    +1
    It is interesting that air defense is not on full combat readiness? Well, like today, according to the forecast, an attack is not expected and they relaxed their belts
  • Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 5 December 2020 12: 14
    -4
    Quote: Sergey Tokarev
    if you don’t know, then I live in Russia, I’m Russian and at the same time a Muslim ...

    - Come on! Traitor to his people ...
    1. Dear sofa expert. 5 December 2020 20: 43
      +4
      Quote: Sergey Tokarev
      - if you don't know, then I live in Russia, I am Russian and at the same time a Muslim ...

      - Come on! Traitor to his people ...

      In a democratic state, which is Russia, freedom of choice of religion is guaranteed by the constitution. Isn't that so with you?

      And here you have, by the way, in the photo, the form of the state to which you kind of swore an oath. And serve another. It's about traitors.
  • Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 8 December 2020 11: 21
    0
    Quote: Dear couch expert.
    And here you have, by the way, in the photo, the form of the state to which you kind of swore an oath. And serve another. It's about traitors.

    - This state has disappeared... And his main traitors were his leadership - for various reasons - from stupidity (Gorbachev), from the desire for power (Yeltsin), from passivity and apathy - a lot of other top leaders. And they all got so bad that no one wanted to obey them ...
    Millions of people fled from this state in 14 union republics, why blame "for treason" to me alone ?! wink
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 10 December 2020 15: 34
    0
    Quote: magma
    Even the information available for those interested in the subject is enough to determine that the article was written by a layman who has no idea about the subject

    If my memory serves me, you work in the hospital. So your business, excuse me, is the contents of the chamber pots (in medical terminology - analyzes), and you tell us about rockets and laymen ...

    - I am ashamed to even ask: where did you get your knowledge in airplanes, rockets, etc., etc. ?! laughing lol
  • Michael1950 Offline Michael1950
    Michael1950 (Michael) 10 December 2020 15: 37
    0
    Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
    It is interesting that air defense is not on full combat readiness? Well, like today, according to the forecast, an attack is not expected and they relaxed their belts

    - Of course, in air defense, as in other types of armed forces, there are also different degrees of combat readiness:

    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%BE%
    %D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8