Russia also acquired a kamikaze drone

November 19, 2020 64

The term "loitering munition" or "kamikaze drone" has recently been frequently discussed in the world press. Despite the fact that for the first time such weapons were used by Israel back in 1989, they attracted special attention of the military precisely during the recent battles in Nagorno-Karabakh.

It is worth noting that Israeli drones such as Harpy or Heron also distinguished themselves this time. The Americans and the Chinese have something similar, but neither one nor the other has yet brought their developments to delivery to the troops.

However, our country does not "sit idly by," which worries Western experts very much.

Back in the summer of 2019, the Kalashnikov concern presented the Lancet kamikaze drone. In August of this year, The National Interest once again recalled "Russian flying grenades" capable of flying even through a window.

It is not in vain that the West is worried, as in some respects our Lancet is superior to Israeli drones. In particular, it is the best in terms of radio invisibility and maneuverability.

The Russian kamikaze drone was created in two versions. Lancet-1 is lighter and intended for reconnaissance missions. In turn, "Lancet-3" is capable of carrying a payload weighing 3 kg, staying in the air for 40 minutes and reaching speeds of up to 110 km / h. At the same time, it does not lose touch with the operator and is extremely accurate, and the electric motors make our kamikaze drone quiet and "environmentally friendly".

In general, even taking into account the fact that the "lancet" is not yet in service, the alarm of our Western partners is quite justified. After all, drones can already be used by PMCs to collect information about their practical use.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Vladimir Tuzakov

+3

19 November 2020 11: 37

A roasted rooster pecked at least, so we must at least get away with promises, so why didn't we move before. Israel had it back in the last century, and the Russian Federation with "unparalleled" statements had nothing more on promising weapons ... Probably, "Rogozins headed" (which became a household name) this direction of weapons too ...
1. Sergey Tokarev
  
  -1
  
  19 November 2020 11: 52
  
  the budget is not rubber, to move everywhere. Russia, like Israel, the United States does not compensate for part of the budget.
  1. Vladimir Tuzakov
    
    +4
    
    19 November 2020 11: 57
    
    You need to steal less (following the example of Roscosmos with boundless theft) ... They don't know how to do it differently, the vertical of power is based on that ... Monopolies have been created with systemic kickbacks, and starting from the formation of the Russian Federation, the systemic component of the state is sharpened only for plundering and withering away everything ...
    1. Sergey Tokarev
      
      -2
      
      19 November 2020 11: 59
      
      They steal EVERYWHERE. Rogozin with Roscosmos is far from the US military industry and Senators in theft. How much did you spend on the same clumsy flying and harmless FU-35? also say that Mil won over Kamov for the supply of helicopters to Afghanistan during the war without a bribe ...
      1. Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        +4
        
        19 November 2020 12: 16
        
        The problem is that to earn a million dollars you need to WORK for a year and more than one, so to steal the same million, one day is enough, and if there is no real responsibility and punishment for such theft, then NOBODY will work, but try to steal (altering K. Marx, - there is no such crime that they did not commit in order to steal a million) and if a billion, then there is an official organized criminal group, which we have in the Russian Federation ... The problem is in the created theft system, the main ones steal billions of dollars and the rest are allowed to steal millions, so that did not interfere ...
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2020 12: 22
        
        first prove your statement in court. and then on yours all who have shoes more expensive than your slippers thieves. There are a lot of reports about the punishment of officials who steal. Russia is not Ukraine where the thief is in the presidential chair.
        
        Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        +2
        
        19 November 2020 12: 38
        
        When expensive real estate and bills with many zeros from officials and others are known and no action, and the swindlers and thieves proven in court have a full opportunity to hide in Israel and other London, what are we talking about? Shake Israel alone, so there are dozens of megavors and KILLERS, and they further participate in business and fraud. So in the United States, criminals are returned by force, in the Russian Federation such intentions are not even heard ...
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        -1
        
        19 November 2020 12: 40
        
        In the United States, criminals are free to walk, and people like Viktor Bout are sitting with unproven guilt, and many even without declaring guilt through the kidneys in the cell ... The United States is your sample, the Ukrainians are your Slav brothers ...
        
        Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        +2
        
        19 November 2020 12: 45
        
        DO NOT confuse politics with elementary theft ... In the US, everyone
        A businessman or politician convicted of theft or fraud, even for non-payment of taxes, will receive a term of 99 years in prison. In the Russian Federation, this does not happen, it is not for nothing that the common name "Bassmanny Court" is called ... You either do not know each other, or you shield ...
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        0
        
        19 November 2020 12: 52
        
        Janitor Peter can steal a billion? The maximum will steal a broom with a shovel. so I'm not confusing anything.
        
        Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        0
        
        19 November 2020 13: 04
        
        You understand the meaning of the text, from the answers - no ... So a troll, as the best option, perhaps an anti-Russian provocateur ...
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2020 13: 07
        
        self-critical))) because as a Ukrainian, as a Russian, I am not a brother or a Slav, and we will deal with Russian officials without your American experience.
        
        Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        +2
        
        19 November 2020 13: 21
        
        So they revealed themselves as completely anti-Russian, for the thief shouts loudest of all, - stop the thief ...
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        +3
        
        19 November 2020 13: 47
        
        The Slavic brotherhood is being destroyed by the enemies of the Slavs. There is a saying: "your own fool is worse than the enemy" ...
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        +1
        
        19 November 2020 16: 16
        
        in hell with the Polish hyenas your ukrov will have a brotherhood in one pot!
      2. Binder
        
        -5
        
        19 November 2020 13: 22
        
        Quote: Sergey Tokarev
        How much did you spend on the same clumsy flying and harmless FU-35?
        
        You seem to be confused - the F-35 flies perfectly and successfully performs combat missions, and the characteristics you have given are entirely consistent with the Su-57.
        
        sgrabik
        
        +1
        
        19 November 2020 16: 29
        
        We know perfectly well how the F-35 flies without you, the Americans have absolutely nothing to boast about in this case, so hang your noodles to someone else, the Americans quite possibly, instead of fine-tuning this super-expensive semi-finished product even for the US military budget, can resume production of much more successful and efficient F-22.
        
        Binder
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2020 19: 04
        
        You cannot know how F-35s fly - Zvezda TV channel will not tell you about it objectively. And the F-22 is an aircraft of a completely different purpose, even you should know this if you undertake to talk about modern combat aviation.
  2. Sapsan136
    
    +5
    
    19 November 2020 15: 33
    
    The Russian Federation needs to spend less money on foreigners, both outside the Russian Federation and on its territory, and introduce taxes not on the poor people, but on the rich, as is done in the West and in Saudi Arabia, whose citizenship law could bring the Russian Federation a lot of benefits if she had passed a similar citizenship law.
  3. assault 2019
    
    +1
    
    21 November 2020 00: 10
    
    less need to squander the budget for the maintenance of parasitic princelings in the Caucasus and Central Asia.
    These billions of dollars could have been used to develop and supply many modern weapons to the troops.
2. sgrabik
  
  0
  
  19 November 2020 16: 20
  
  Well, there is also Serdyukov - Taburetkin put his wet hand with his idiotic optimization of the army, but you never know such freaks - tyrants influenced the course of rearmament of our army with new promising types of weapons !!!
Cyril

-2

19 November 2020 12: 17

Back in the summer of 2019, the Kalashnikov concern presented the Lancet kamikaze drone. In August of this year, The National Interest once again recalled "Russian flying grenades" capable of fly even through the window.

At the same time, it does not lose touch with the operator and is extremely accurate, and electric motors make our drone kamikaze quiet and "green"

Video of the test of the Israeli Rotem kamikaze drone "flying through the window" and having electric motors. What is so unique about these abilities of the Lancet is not clear.

Moreover, Ukraine has also developed similar high-precision ammunition; tests were carried out back in 2017.
1. Sergey Tokarev
  
  +4
  
  19 November 2020 12: 28
  
  about Ukraine has developed this already bearded anecdote since the times of the USSR.
  1. Cyril
    
    -3
    
    19 November 2020 12: 35
    
    Why anecdote? There is a specific video of the tests.
    1. Sergey Tokarev
      
      +4
      
      19 November 2020 12: 37
      
      There are a lot of videos with the created primates of the wunderwolf. only nothing went into the series, and it remained crap in a single copy, like a NAVOZETS tank.
      1. Cyril
        
        -3
        
        19 November 2020 12: 45
        
        So the "Lancet" was not seen in the troops :)
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        +1
        
        19 November 2020 12: 49
        
        the miracle cannons promised for the American zumwalts have not been noticed yet either ... And where does the Lancets or Shoigu report in front of you in the kitchen in panties and slippers in your couch troops?
        
        Cyril
        
        -1
        
        19 November 2020 12: 55
        
        the miracle cannons promised for the American zumwalts have not been noticed yet either ...
        
        Comparing a railgun with a patrolling kamikaze drone is strong, this is the height of logic :)
        
        And where are the Lancets in your couch troops
        
        So I say that they do not exist - the article says about this, if you know how to read, of course :)
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        0
        
        19 November 2020 13: 00
        
        I rely on your logic. even shit outside of Russia smells like flowers for you. if there are no drones, then it is not needed or the time has not come. there are gliding bombs. will also fly into the window.
        
        Cyril
        
        -3
        
        19 November 2020 13: 11
        
        I rely on your logic.
        
        You do not rest on my logic, but on your ideas about "primates" :)
        
        if there are no drones, then it is not needed or the time has not come
        
        Yes yes yes :) Great excuse :)
        
        there are gliding bombs. will also fly into the window.
        
        Russia has no planning bombs yet :)
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        -1
        
        19 November 2020 13: 13
        
        Not a fact ... the caliber was also not there until he fell on the head in Syria. and the Americans do not have railguns))) they have a lot of things and will not.
        
        Cyril
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2020 13: 15
        
        so the Americans do not have railguns)))
        
        But they have gliding bombs :)
        Both in the article and in my comments, it is about loitering kamikaze ammunition, which is already in service with many countries, but Russia does not. This is not some kind of super-technology, like a railgun, requiring long research and development, etc.
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        -1
        
        19 November 2020 13: 17
        
        in Russia, there are no aircraft carriers, and there are no homosexuals in the army, because they are not provided for by the defense doctrine ...
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        sgrabik
        
        -1
        
        19 November 2020 16: 37
        
        Planning, or corrected aviation ammunition has long been developed and mass-produced at Russian military-industrial complex enterprises, this has been repeatedly confirmed by their successful use in Syria, it is extremely ridiculous and stupid to deny this !!!
        
        Cyril
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2020 17: 03
        
        Gliding bombs and guided bombs are two different concepts.
        
        There is only one gliding bomb in Russia, the Drill, but it is not yet in service.
        
        Cyril
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2020 13: 23
        
        caliber, too, was not until he fell on the head in Syria
        
        The Kalibr cruise missile has been in service with Russia since the beginning of the 90s :) You do not know anything about the armaments of the Russian army - why are you trying to discuss this topic?)
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        -1
        
        19 November 2020 13: 26
        
        a specialist found out ... what was in "armament" has nothing to do with what is now. besides the name
        
        Cyril
        
        -5
        
        19 November 2020 13: 37
        
        what was in "armament" has nothing to do with what is now. besides the name
        
        "Caliber-M", about which you are trying to talk here, is not yet in service with the Russian army :)
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        0
        
        19 November 2020 13: 38
        
        turned into a telepath? Syria was shot with the wrong caliber that from the 90s ...
        
        Cyril
        
        -4
        
        19 November 2020 13: 55
        
        turned into a telepath? laughing, they shot at Syria with the wrong caliber that from the 90s ...
        
        The 3M14T and 3M14K missiles (it was they who struck in Syria) were presented to the general public back in 2001, they have been in service with Russia since the early 2000s :)
        
        Sergey Tokarev
        
        +1
        
        19 November 2020 13: 59
        
        just 10 years have passed since the 90s but the fact that the calibers fly further than the Americans thought was also known in the 2000s?
        
        Cyril
        
        -4
        
        19 November 2020 15: 17
        
        just 10 years have passed since the 90s
        
        So these are the very missiles that were developed in the early 90s :)
        
        sgrabik
        
        0
        
        19 November 2020 16: 52
        
        Now you can clearly see what kind of connoisseur of Russian weapons you are, "Caliber-M" has been mass-produced for several years and is in service with the Russian Navy, this missile system, along with other weapons systems, is equipped with all small missile ships, corvettes that have come down from the stocks of factories, frigates and submarines, and next year the serial production of the Zircon hypersonic anti-ship missiles will begin, you are clearly living in the past tense !!!
        
        Cyril
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2020 17: 04
        
        "Caliber-M" is NOT in service. It began to be developed in 2018, and it is planned to enter service until 2027. So take it easy.
        
        sgrabik
        
        +1
        
        19 November 2020 17: 35
        
        "Caliber-M" is a promising, more powerful and long-range modification of "Caliber", it is really still in development, here we are talking about the "Caliber" missiles, which are already mass-produced today, and why in this case deliberately confuse ... with carrots !!!
        
        Cyril
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2020 17: 36
        
        So I did not start the song about "Caliber", but my opponent :) Read the comments carefully.
        
        And the "Lancet", which is referred to in the article, is not currently produced commercially.
        
        sgrabik
        
        0
        
        19 November 2020 17: 44
        
        The lancet has not yet gone through the entire cycle of state. tests, this is a new type of weapon and it is quite reasonable that when certain problems are identified, it takes some time to eliminate these problems, fine-tune and modernize, but this does not mean that it does not exist, it can be said that it is practically ready and will begin in the near future go into service.
        
        Cyril
        
        -4
        
        19 November 2020 17: 56
        
        Well, when it goes through the whole cycle of tests and is adopted for service, starts to enter the troops - then it is possible to write with good reason that "Russia has acquired its own don-kamikaze." Because there are many cases when, at the testing stage, an almost finished weapon was abandoned and its refinement was wrapped up.
        
        And as for the fact that the "Lancet" in its characteristics surpasses the same Israeli similar drones, it can be argued only after full combat use. Israeli drones have actually proven their characteristics, the Lancet is not yet available.
        
        sgrabik
        
        0
        
        19 November 2020 17: 58
        
        Well, I don't argue with that, that's right, it remains to wait for the end of the complex of state tests of the "Lancet" and the start of its serial production.
    2. 123
      
      +1
      
      19 November 2020 17: 49
      
      Why anecdote? There is a specific video of the tests.
      
      There are a lot of such videos, it's just that they are usually not called tests, and fat boars in military uniform do not clap their hands on them.
      1. Cyril
        
        -4
        
        19 November 2020 17: 58
        
        There are a lot of such videos, it's just that they are usually not called tests.
        
        What in the video I have provided does not correspond to the term "tests"?)
        
        and fat boars in military uniform do not clap their hands on them.
        
        Tests in the presence of high-ranking military officials are carried out in all countries of the world, including Russia :)
        
        123
        
        +2
        
        19 November 2020 18: 10
        
        What in the video I have provided does not correspond to the term "tests"?)
        
        Why doesn't it match? Still as appropriate, I brought you a video of similar content and described the difference. The anecdote is rather: "I developed such high-precision ammunition." In fact, they have the same aircraft model and the whole "innovation" is in a suspended grenade. Cheap and cheerful. The Israeli and Russian drones in question are still somewhat different. They were really developed for specific tasks. Here's another interesting example worthy of development.
        
        Cyril
        
        -4
        
        19 November 2020 18: 21
        
        Still as appropriate, I brought you a video of similar content and described the difference.
        
        In your pink universe, there may be no difference between the crash of an aircraft model and the test of a UAV :) In your case, I'm not surprised at anything.
        
        The anecdote is rather: "I developed such high-precision ammunition." In fact, they have the same aircraft model and the whole "innovation" is in a suspended grenade.
        
        In the video I have given, there is an unmanned guided vehicle with onboard electronics for targeting and a warhead (it does not drop any grenades). Such a single-use ammunition should not be some kind of complex device :) Judging by the tests, it quite fulfills its task (hitting the target and detonating it).
        
        Cheap and cheerful.
        
        Right. This is exactly what an unmanned kamikaze drone should be :)
        
        The Israeli and Russian drones in question are still somewhat different. They were really designed for specific tasks.
        
        All kamikaze drones - Russian, Israeli, and Ukrainian - are developed for a specific task. Namely, for the destruction of manpower (including in fortifications) and armored vehicles.
        
        What is the difference between these three examples, except for your subjective rejection of everything Ukrainian - it is not clear :)
2. KNF
  
  0
  
  19 November 2020 14: 54
  
  Ukraine has Turkish drones.
Binder

+1

19 November 2020 13: 17

If the author of the text undertakes to write about loitering ammunition, then he should know that the Israeli UAV IAI Heron, unlike Harpy, is not a kamikaze drone, it is intended only for reconnaissance and observation. In general, the text, as is often the case with Russians, evokes a smile - the Russian Lancet apparatus does not exist yet, has not shown itself anywhere in combat conditions, but it already surpasses Israeli drones "in some parameters." Why are you writing, gentlemen, how can you compare something that has been successfully fighting for a long time, destroying enemy equipment and personnel, with the fact that it exists only as a piece experimental product?
1. The comment was deleted.
2. Cyril
  
  -5
  
  19 November 2020 13: 23
  
  you need to write something "victorious" :) The Su-57 or Armata, which has no analogues in the world, have already set their teeth on edge, you need some kind of variety :)
3. sgrabik
  
  -1
  
  19 November 2020 16: 55
  
  The lancet undergoes flight technical tests and fine-tuning, this does not mean at all that it does not exist !!!
  1. Binder
    
    0
    
    19 November 2020 19: 09
    
    It will exist when it goes into series, enters the troops and will be able to successfully solve tasks on the battlefield, but for now it's just a prototype.
Alexey

+1

19 November 2020 18: 55

Didn't you notice the news slipped from Syria about the strange unknown destruction of the Barmaley? It just looks like our drones.
Object.F7

+2

20 November 2020 05: 35

Kalashnikov is a brand, only eccentrics can doubt it, for the Israelis it burns in one place. They are all such super-unmanned since the 80s ... And the fact that in the 80s in the unmanned version Buran was delivered to the launch barrel, automatically refueled, and then in the unmanned version it circles around the Earth, followed by landing, where the computer itself decided to land you need it not the way people wanted, but on the opposite side of the strip, because unfavorable wind .... How do you like such space-scale drones, gentlemen, admirers of small rotary-winged fakes? Since the 80s they are)))
Dzafdet

-1

20 November 2020 10: 42

One piece for all the RF Ministry of Defense? Isn't it not enough? :-))))
Dust

0

21 November 2020 17: 28

The era of Drones has begun ... But they capture territories on the ground anyway ... So armored vehicles will not disappear anywhere, but will be improved ...