A blow on a group of azerbaijani special forces caught on video

Azerbaijani troops came close to the city of Shushi in Nagorno-Karabakh, which is located at an altitude of 1368 m above sea level, 11 km south of Stepanakert. A video of an attack on a reconnaissance and sabotage group of Azerbaijani special forces that took place in this mountainous and wooded area appeared on the Web.

It should be noted that before this the leadership of the unrecognized NKR appealed to the Armenians of the whole world with an appeal to stand up for the defense of the ancient and active capital of Nagorno-Karabakh. Hundreds of volunteers went to the front lines, some of whom fought in the first war in the area nearly three decades ago. Many of them know these places well.

War remains war. Technique another

- says the fighter, answering the question, which war is harder.

If Turkey removes its hands, we will drive them to the Kura. Turkey is Turkey. And Azerbaijan is a plastic country

- says another soldier.

After some time, on the ridge opposite to the Armenian positions, the appearance of a large DRG of Azerbaijani special forces is recorded.

There the group goes

- says the voice-over.

It is shown how a detachment of volunteers determines the exact coordinates of the enemy and communicates this data to the gunners. Then they change their position to avoid being hit by enemy drones and artillery.

In the area where the DRG of the Azerbaijani army is located, an artillery strike is delivered, after which the volunteers are nominated to assess the results.

They do not take the journalist of the ANNA-News agency with them for an understandable reason. A battle ensues, as a result of which three Armenians are killed. Survivors reported that the Azerbaijani DRG, in the amount of 15-20 troops, was destroyed.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
    Sapsan136 (Alexander) 3 November 2020 14: 20
    I absolutely do not understand Armenia's disregard for small-caliber anti-aircraft guns, because they can support the infantry with fire and work out on light armored vehicles of the enemy and shoot down the drone in good visibility conditions, or at least force the drones to go to medium and high heights from which they can no longer hit as aimed as now. The speed of drones in combat (patrol) mode is not great and it is possible to shoot it down even with a sniper rifle if the sniper is good, especially since there are very good sniper systems, medium and large caliber, for which armored personnel carriers are not a problem.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 3 November 2020 15: 25
      The answer is possible with small-caliber artillery and machine guns - mountains, you can't drag them on your back, and rare roads through the gorges are shot through ... In the mountains, the specifics, Chechnya is an example ... Here are portable kits for detecting and clearing the sky from loitering ammunition and UAVs is already NECESSARY ... To create urgently, as in wartime, delaying death is like ...
      1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
        Sapsan136 (Alexander) 3 November 2020 15: 40
        ZU-23-2 were used in the mountains and quite successfully. In Afghanistan, the most terrible enemy of the USSR Air Force, before the appearance of the Stingers, was the DShK, and even after the appearance of the Stingers, many continued to consider the DShK no less, if not more, a dangerous air defense system. In Karabakh, the mountains do not interfere with the use of either tanks or MLRS, and I do not see any problems with the ZU-23-2 in the back of the Ural trucks. This installation can be towed by a light jeep, and a heavy machine gun, for example, UTES, is quite capable of carrying even an infantry. In Chechnya, such machine guns, almost without fail, were taken with special forces groups. In any case, we always took the ROCK with us, it does not weigh so much, but in battle it is an irreplaceable thing.
        1. Nikolaevich I Offline Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I (Vladimir) 4 November 2020 14: 56
          Quote: Sapsan136
          ZU-23-2 were used in the mountains and quite successfully

          And ZGU-1, ZU-2, 6U5 (6) will not work in mountain conditions? what By the way, didn't they forget the Kolos MANPADS early?
          1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
            Sapsan136 (Alexander) 4 November 2020 19: 01
            Yes, and that would work, but the Armenians do not use it and I don’t understand why ...
      2. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
        Sapsan136 (Alexander) 3 November 2020 16: 15
        But it would be problematic for Azerbaijan to increase the flight altitude of its drones in order to get out of the effective fire zone of small-caliber anti-aircraft guns. Firstly, air strikes from high altitudes are not as accurate as strikes from low altitudes, and secondly, the air in the mountains is discharged and in order for the drones to go to high altitudes, it will be necessary to reduce the mass of ammunition that the drone takes in flight, otherwise the engine will simply not pull, to climb to a high altitude ...
        1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 3 November 2020 16: 28
          Shooting on the UAV is ineffectual, it has been proven by practice (Even in Karabakh, the Armenians are firing at the approaching ammunition, ending in the defeat of these shooters). The main thing is the detection and defeat of a UAV or a loitering ammunition, a single shot of a homing missile, otherwise there is no other way ... Today, everyone has switched to high-precision weapons and small-caliber artillery are replaced by high-precision anti-aircraft guns and other means ... So in terms of efficiency, especially in the mountains, a dozen ATGMs are better on the back, rather than 23mm artillery on wheels on the road ...
          1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
            Sapsan136 (Alexander) 3 November 2020 16: 36
            Where did you serve with such thoughts ?! And the AK cartridge is not effective against aviation, so they shoot from the AK out of despair, because the commanders sowed their brains and left them without air defense cover.
            1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 3 November 2020 16: 40
              We served YESTERDAY, and today today's and TOMORROW requirements are on the agenda. To work ahead of the curve, whoever lags behind, loses, an axiom, especially in military affairs ... (Karabakh is an example of this).
              1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
                Sapsan136 (Alexander) 3 November 2020 17: 33
                Something I don't see anything new in Karabakh, compared to the 2008 war in Georgia. Russia then quickly landed Georgian drones, but the Armenians and ZU do not use the newest Su-30s, which could have zeroed out the drones and MiG-29s of the Azerbaijani Air Force, and the Turkish F-16s are a completely solvable problem for them. In addition, the F-16s have a larger reflective surface and they will become a much easier target for Armenia's air defense systems than plastic drones.
                1. sweeper Offline sweeper
                  sweeper 4 November 2020 12: 41
                  The newest SU-30 also needs the latest combat pilots, capable of controlling them and their weapons, and not "honored pensioners". And without that, the newest SU-30s are just expensive show pieces.
                  1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
                    Sapsan136 (Alexander) 4 November 2020 13: 05
                    In India, there are not bad pilots for the Su-30; they won training battles with the Yankees in the F-15. If there are no normal pilots in Armenia, these are the problems of the Armenian Defense Ministry.
    2. Ser sash Offline Ser sash
      Ser sash (Ser Sash) 3 November 2020 22: 08
      The UAV does not need to hang over the target, the optics are good there.
      You can observe without entering the detection zone, and even more so the defeat.
      1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
        Sapsan136 (Alexander) 4 November 2020 13: 06
        An anti-aircraft vehicle with a 100-liter engine cannot physically carry long-range missiles, so do not load
        1. Ser sash Offline Ser sash
          Ser sash (Ser Sash) 4 November 2020 13: 21
          You will probably be surprised, but aerial bombs can be dropped 30 km from the target (gliding). And 3 km (the maximum range of cannon air defense and MANPADS) is not a long-range radius.
          1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
            Sapsan136 (Alexander) 4 November 2020 19: 04
            My dear, you will probably be surprised, but the greater the range of the weapon, the more it weighs. The guidance head, fuel for the engine, rudders, the engine itself and so on, so that the drone cannot use long-range missiles, or gliding bombs, from long distances. In the case of an aerial bomb, for its flight over a long distance, a large drop height is needed, and this is beyond the power of a drone with an engine of only 100 hp, and even in thin mountain air. A bomb dropped from about 600-800 meters will not fly, 3 km ... will not work. Judging by the accuracy of the strikes and footage in the video, the flight and drop altitude is about 600 meters ...
  2. Kuramori Reika Offline Kuramori Reika
    Kuramori Reika (Kuramori Reika) 3 November 2020 16: 28
    The DRG's mistake was movement against the background of the horizon in an area located relatively higher than another area. The price for this omission, their lives.
    1. Binder Offline Binder
      Binder (Miron) 4 November 2020 04: 07
      Quote: Kuramori Reika
      DRG error

      It is highly doubtful that the group of walking people that appeared on the video are really special forces soldiers who went out on a mission, they are more like a collective farm brigade of vegetable growers returning from the field. And the Armenian gray-haired uncles reminded of the pioneer youth and the game "Zarnitsa"
      1. DeGreen Offline DeGreen
        DeGreen 4 November 2020 07: 44
        Artsakh Army is similar to the Armed Forces of Ukraine
  3. Petr Vladimirovich (Peter) 3 November 2020 17: 44
    Even wondering how it will end?
  4. Igor Berg Offline Igor Berg
    Igor Berg (Igor Berg) 3 November 2020 19: 39
    And almost all of them have tin Soviet helmets ... zero benefit, and excess weight ... and no one has heard of armored vehicles.
    1. DeGreen Offline DeGreen
      DeGreen 4 November 2020 07: 41
      Igor, they have armor. These are mainly old Bundeswehr and old Soviet ones. I also agree about the helmet. Even the special forces of Artsakh walk like homeless people
  5. Ser sash Offline Ser sash
    Ser sash (Ser Sash) 3 November 2020 22: 04
    If there is ammunition aiming at a cell phone transmitter, why can't you create an ammunition that works for a UAV transmitter, it's more powerful than a cell phone?
  6. DeGreen Offline DeGreen
    DeGreen 4 November 2020 07: 38
    For me, Armenians are arrogant, cunning traders. With which the whole of Russia is crammed. So are the Azerbaijanis. Therefore, I am not sorry for either one or the other
  7. DeGreen Offline DeGreen
    DeGreen 4 November 2020 07: 43
    The army of Armenia is the same community of marginal people as the army of Ukraine
    1. Igor Berg Offline Igor Berg
      Igor Berg (Igor Berg) 4 November 2020 09: 00
      but there is one significant BUT - Ukraine with its army does not go to war with its neighbors and around the world, like the Russian Federation and the United States. Even China is the smartest, breaking through and proving its global influence economically and politically.
      1. DeGreen Offline DeGreen
        DeGreen 4 November 2020 16: 03
        Yeah, schazz. Where is Russia climbing? Is there evidence of the presence of the Russian army in Ukraine and Armenia? No. But the law and other homosexuals are fighting on the side of Azerbaijan. Ukraine itself admitted this. And yet, career military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine fought in Chechnya. As in Georgia, the air defense systems that shot down our planes were used by operators from the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Google to the rescue
  8. mpad Offline mpad
    mpad (Peter) 4 November 2020 09: 48
    Armenians are hopelessly losing the information war. For a month and a half, this is the first standing video about the war in Artsakh in Russian, and they should be filmed and shown daily. The sympathies of the Russians are on the side of Azerbaijan, since, firstly, they are more successful, and secondly, according to the majority of Russian-speaking commentators, they are waging a just war. Why hide it, my sympathies also gradually went to the side of the Azerbaijanis. But then I looked at this video and realized that these guys cannot be on the wrong side. No matter how the geopolitical situation develops, they defend their land. God bless you guys! I want none of you to stay in these mountains, and if you have to lie in the ground, so that it is not in vain.
  9. Air defense Offline Air defense
    Air defense (Eduard Petrusenko) 11 November 2020 10: 59
    For "specialists". Any aerial target can be hit with a machine gun if it is within the range of actual fire. Everything is decided by the training of the unit and the ability of the commander to control fire.