Outdoor surveillance footage of Armenian S-300 destroyed

16

Details of the destruction of Armenian military hardware by drones of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces have appeared on the Web. They were impartially recorded by surveillance cameras, so the reliability of the information is beyond doubt.


It should be noted that we are talking about eventson October 9, 2020. Then drones - "kamikaze", being in the sky over Nagorno-Karabakh, hit the S-300PS launcher and the three-coordinate radar ST-68U (19Ж6) of the Armenian Armed Forces in the village of Kubatly (Gubadli or Sanasar). The blow was delivered by Israeli-made IAI Harpy homing aircraft, which are in service with the Azerbaijani army. However, there were doubters who did not believe what had happened.

In time-lapse pictures published by the public "War, Syria", it is shown how one of the drones flies in and hits the S-300PS. The sad consequences for Armenians are also demonstrated, in the form of the destroyed equipment.







Such testimonies aroused the interest of the public, versed in such matters. According to experts, in this case, the Armenian military is to blame for being discovered. In fact, they unmasked their positions, since they neglected basic precautions, knowing that the enemy had air superiority. Therefore, the result is logical.
We are
Baku first showed footage of destruction of S-300 launcher
Azerbaijan reports on the destruction of the S-300 of Armenia: in the sky over the border of the UAV of Turkey
Reporterin Yandex News
Read Reporterin Google News
Ad
We are open to cooperation with authors in the news and analytical departments. A prerequisite is the ability to quickly analyze the text and check the facts, to write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. We offer flexible working hours and regular payments. Please send your responses with examples of work to [email protected]
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 123 Offline 123
    123 (123) 26 October 2020 00: 30
    +3
    However, there were doubters who did not believe what had happened.

    It's good. Healthy skepticism you know winked Only an idiot can believe everything that both sides lie.
    What do we have in this case? Launcher in stowed position ... winked I look forward to the invasion of the Papuans with stories that the Russian air defense can not do anything
    1. Dear sofa expert. Offline Dear sofa expert.
      Dear sofa expert. 26 October 2020 18: 17
      +2
      What do we have in this case? Launcher in stowed position ...

      Or a mock-up covered with a camouflage net?)
  2. boriz Offline boriz
    boriz (boriz) 26 October 2020 02: 43
    0
    Interaction with US military instructors clearly negatively impacts the intelligence of the instructors.
  3. gorenina91 Online gorenina91
    gorenina91 (Irina) 26 October 2020 02: 48
    -3
    Personally, I'm in the subject:

    Azerbaijanis went for a breakthrough: new footage of the defeat of Armenian troops published

    I have already expressed my opinion:

    There is enough power to disable the equipment and kill and injure nearby military personnel ... -It all depends on the accuracy of the hit ... -And ... -sorry ... -for cynicism ... -everything is quite "inexpensive "...

    - But what I personally want to say ... - The worst thing is that ... what ... that, most likely, the operators and crews-calculations of this installation of the S-300PS air defense missile system and the three-coordinate radar ST-68U (19Ж6) ... - were Russian (Russian) ... - Personally, I don't believe that the Armenians served all this ...
    -And all this was on alert ... -there is video footage, where it is clearly visible how the receiving device of the station (locators rotate) and people are visible running alongside ... -it is easy to find these frames in any search engine ... -yes and what can be the "marching position of the installation" when there is a war ... -What is it (the installation) to drag from place to place ... is that ...- a mortar, or something .. to "pull it closer" .. ...
  4. alexey alexeyev_2 Offline alexey alexeyev_2
    alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 26 October 2020 08: 14
    +1
    Glass for fools for a while. The same warriors as the Libyans ..
  5. dimi Offline dimi
    dimi (Dmitriy) 26 October 2020 08: 52
    0
    the question is, what does siriantube have to do with it ???
  6. Kuramori Reika Offline Kuramori Reika
    Kuramori Reika (Kuramori Reika) 26 October 2020 09: 07
    +2
    It is worth raising the selling price of weapons for Armenia. Or sell discarded rubbish, in this country, neither one nor the other is still useless. They have a war going on, and the commanders are eating shish kebab.
  7. Michael I Offline Michael I
    Michael I (Michael I) 26 October 2020 09: 17
    -1
    Russia has no luck for buyers. All krivorukov and except for AK and RPG-7, do not know how to use anything
    1. passing by Offline passing by
      passing by (passing by) 26 October 2020 09: 23
      0
      The Turks are still coping with the S-400 ... And the Abrams did not help the Arabs against the Houthis ...
      1. Vladimir Tuzakov Offline Vladimir Tuzakov
        Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 26 October 2020 18: 23
        +2
        Everything in the newness of the weapon, at first it gives a stunning effect, then the antidote is looked for and everything becomes ordinary and not so devastating weapon. Of course, the intelligence of the Armenians failed, did not give out the necessary information about the possibilities and plans of the Azerbaijanis. (maybe she hoped for the SVR of the Russian Federation?). As a result, we have good material for further tactical planning (for the RF Armed Forces, this is the third and last call to future defeats) ...
      2. Michael I Offline Michael I
        Michael I (Michael I) 26 October 2020 19: 03
        -3
        So far, there is no real fighting yet. No weapon can be called effective until confirmed by participation in real hostilities. S-300 and Pantsyr have not yet been able to confirm their effectiveness, no matter what the reason
        1. Dear sofa expert. Offline Dear sofa expert.
          Dear sofa expert. 26 October 2020 20: 36
          +1
          No weapon can be called effective until confirmed by participation in real hostilities. S-300 and Pantsyr have not yet been able to confirm their effectiveness

          Please give an example of the effectiveness of the combat use of the Aegis system?
          1. Michael I Offline Michael I
            Michael I (Michael I) 26 October 2020 21: 36
            -1
            Did I call it effective? The S-75 and S-120 were effective at the time, they shot down American (in Vietnam) and Israeli (1973) aircraft. And modern Russian air defense systems have not shown their effectiveness and therefore cannot be considered as such
            1. Dear sofa expert. Offline Dear sofa expert.
              Dear sofa expert. 26 October 2020 22: 38
              +3
              And modern Russian air defense systems have not shown their effectiveness and therefore cannot be considered as such

              Well, it's simple, firstly, there was no reason for this, and secondly, all these attempts to use air defense weapons tactically are illiterate, and not always according to their intended purpose, naturally do not allow revealing their capabilities.
              Where it is needed, they will show themselves.
              1. Michael I Offline Michael I
                Michael I (Michael I) 27 October 2020 07: 38
                -1
                When they show it, then we will return to the conversation about their effectiveness. Until then, it's just a cat in a poke
                1. Dear sofa expert. Offline Dear sofa expert.
                  Dear sofa expert. 27 October 2020 10: 48
                  +1
                  When they show it, then we'll return to the conversation,

                  I am for not having to show it.
                  PS Only those who own such a system can show the effectiveness of an echeloned air defense system. Russia has it.
                  Why other countries buy only fragments of this system is also not entirely clear to me.