Outdoor surveillance footage of Armenian S-300 destroyed

16

Details of the destruction of Armenian military hardware by drones of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces have appeared on the Web. They were impartially recorded by surveillance cameras, so the reliability of the information is beyond doubt.

It should be noted that we are talking about eventson October 9, 2020. Then drones - "kamikaze", being in the sky over Nagorno-Karabakh, hit the S-300PS launcher and the three-coordinate radar ST-68U (19Ж6) of the Armenian Armed Forces in the village of Kubatly (Gubadli or Sanasar). The blow was delivered by Israeli-made IAI Harpy homing aircraft, which are in service with the Azerbaijani army. However, there were doubters who did not believe what had happened.



In time-lapse pictures published by the public "War, Syria", it is shown how one of the drones flies in and hits the S-300PS. The sad consequences for Armenians are also demonstrated, in the form of the destroyed equipment.







Such testimonies aroused the interest of the public, versed in such matters. According to experts, in this case, the Armenian military is to blame for being discovered. In fact, they unmasked their positions, since they neglected basic precautions, knowing that the enemy had air superiority. Therefore, the result is logical.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    16 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 123
      +3
      26 October 2020 00: 30
      However, there were doubters who did not believe what had happened.

      It's good. Healthy skepticism you know winked Only an idiot can believe everything that both sides lie.
      What do we have in this case? Launcher in stowed position ... winked I look forward to the invasion of the Papuans with stories that the Russian air defense can not do anything
      1. +2
        26 October 2020 18: 17
        What do we have in this case? Launcher in stowed position ...

        Or a mock-up covered with a camouflage net?)
    2. 0
      26 October 2020 02: 43
      Interaction with US military instructors clearly negatively impacts the intelligence of the instructors.
    3. -3
      26 October 2020 02: 48
      Personally, I'm in the subject:

      Azerbaijanis went for a breakthrough: new footage of the defeat of Armenian troops published

      I have already expressed my opinion:

      There is enough power to disable the equipment and kill and injure nearby military personnel ... -It all depends on the accuracy of the hit ... -And ... -sorry ... -for cynicism ... -everything is quite "inexpensive "...

      - But what I personally want to say ... - The worst thing is that ... what ... that, most likely, the operators and crews-calculations of this installation of the S-300PS air defense missile system and the three-coordinate radar ST-68U (19Ж6) ... - were Russian (Russian) ... - Personally, I don't believe that the Armenians served all this ...
      -And all this was on alert ... -there is video footage, where it is clearly visible how the receiving device of the station (locators rotate) and people are visible running alongside ... -it is easy to find these frames in any search engine ... -yes and what can be the "marching position of the installation" when there is a war ... -What is it (the installation) to drag from place to place ... is that ...- a mortar, or something .. to "pull it closer" .. ...
    4. +1
      26 October 2020 08: 14
      Glass for fools for a while. The same warriors as the Libyans ..
    5. 0
      26 October 2020 08: 52
      the question is, what does siriantube have to do with it ???
    6. +2
      26 October 2020 09: 07
      It is worth raising the selling price of weapons for Armenia. Or sell discarded rubbish, in this country, neither one nor the other is still useless. They have a war going on, and the commanders are eating shish kebab.
    7. -1
      26 October 2020 09: 17
      Russia has no luck for buyers. All krivorukov and except for AK and RPG-7, do not know how to use anything
      1. 0
        26 October 2020 09: 23
        The Turks are still coping with the S-400 ... And the Abrams did not help the Arabs against the Houthis ...
        1. +2
          26 October 2020 18: 23
          Everything in the newness of the weapon, at first it gives a stunning effect, then the antidote is looked for and everything becomes ordinary and not so devastating weapon. Of course, the intelligence of the Armenians failed, did not give out the necessary information about the possibilities and plans of the Azerbaijanis. (maybe she hoped for the SVR of the Russian Federation?). As a result, we have good material for further tactical planning (for the RF Armed Forces, this is the third and last call to future defeats) ...
        2. -3
          26 October 2020 19: 03
          So far, there is no real fighting yet. No weapon can be called effective until confirmed by participation in real hostilities. S-300 and Pantsyr have not yet been able to confirm their effectiveness, no matter what the reason
          1. +1
            26 October 2020 20: 36
            No weapon can be called effective until confirmed by participation in real hostilities. S-300 and Pantsyr have not yet been able to confirm their effectiveness

            Please give an example of the effectiveness of the combat use of the Aegis system?
            1. -1
              26 October 2020 21: 36
              Did I call it effective? The S-75 and S-120 were effective at the time, they shot down American (in Vietnam) and Israeli (1973) aircraft. And modern Russian air defense systems have not shown their effectiveness and therefore cannot be considered as such
              1. +3
                26 October 2020 22: 38
                And modern Russian air defense systems have not shown their effectiveness and therefore cannot be considered as such

                Well, it's simple, firstly, there was no reason for this, and secondly, all these attempts to use air defense weapons tactically are illiterate, and not always according to their intended purpose, naturally do not allow revealing their capabilities.
                Where it is needed, they will show themselves.
                1. -1
                  27 October 2020 07: 38
                  When they show it, then we will return to the conversation about their effectiveness. Until then, it's just a cat in a poke
                  1. +1
                    27 October 2020 10: 48
                    When they show it, then we'll return to the conversation,

                    I am for not having to show it.
                    PS Only those who own such a system can show the effectiveness of an echeloned air defense system. Russia has it.
                    Why other countries buy only fragments of this system is also not entirely clear to me.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"