Russia deploys field camp on the border of Armenia and Karabakh

30

On October 25, 2020, photos of the deployment of a field camp of the Russian military on the border of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh appeared on the Web. It is indicated that this is happening near the village of Tekh in the east of the Syunik region of Armenia, 88 km from the city of Kapan, the administrative center.

The photographs show a bulldozer leveling the soil, three installed tents, a supply of firewood, a military truck, a UAZ "Bukhanka" car, a water tank, military personnel and two Russian tricolors.



The facility is being set up on a hill, next to the road from Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh. Heavy weapons are not visible, therefore, we have before us a "demonstration of the flag", i.e. Russia has designated its presence in this area by organizing a field camp.


It should be noted that according to information from the region, the photographs do indeed show Russian servicemen. Moreover, a few days earlier from the region already were received similar pictures. But then everything was not so obvious and believable.

We remind you that Russian servicemen are guarding the Armenian-Turkish and Armenian-Iranian borders. Just over 300 km. Armenia is a member state of the CSTO. Therefore, Moscow, at the request of Yerevan, can use its military to protect the territorial integrity of Armenia.

In this case, the field camp is needed so that in case of finding "lost" Azerbaijani servicemen, they will calmly turn back. In fact, Yerevan handed over to Moscow control over another section of its state border. This is absolutely legal and logical action at this time. Armenia can hardly be called an economically interesting country for Russia, but it has an important militarypolitical value.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    30 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -2
      25 October 2020 20: 31
      It's a good news. The entire Armenian-Azerbaijani border must be transferred under the control of Russia.
      1. +2
        25 October 2020 23: 42
        figurines - let them fight themselves, and we will congratulate the winner
      2. rrt
        0
        26 October 2020 19: 47
        Yeah, how Azerbazhan transferred its border with Iran to Israel, and wants to transfer the Azerbazhan-Russian border to Turkey (more broadly, NATO).
    2. -6
      25 October 2020 20: 44
      Russia needs to withdraw its troops from Armenia, the presence of 5 thousand soldiers there does not solve anything and does not increase the security of Russia.
      1. -5
        25 October 2020 20: 54
        I wrote about this yesterday. Russia needs to send troops to the territory of Armenia and take control of the border with Azerbaijan. Everything is within the framework of the CSTO guarantees. But I still haven't heard that Armenia made such a request.
        1. +1
          25 October 2020 21: 58
          Russia needs to send troops to the territory of Armenia and take control of the border with Azerbaijan

          That's right, only first, Azerbaijan and Armenia must decide where this border still passes.
          You probably need another 30 years for this?
          1. -5
            25 October 2020 22: 07
            The border has long been defined. It is marked on all maps. Need, of course, delimitation on the ground. But when I see messages like

            on the border of Armenia and Karabakh

            - it becomes clear from which side the material is being fed.
            1. +2
              25 October 2020 23: 00
              on the border of Armenia and Karabakh

              Border of Armenia and Karabakh. Border of Azerbaijan and Karabakh. That is, in fact, Azerbaijan is fighting not with Armenia, but with Karabakh?
              1. -2
                25 October 2020 23: 08
                Azerbaijan is not at war with Armenia. Officially, anyway. And no border (recognized by the UN) between Armenia and Karabakh simply does not exist. It's not on the globe.
                1. +1
                  25 October 2020 23: 41
                  And no border (recognized by the UN) between Armenia and Karabakh simply does not exist. It's not on the globe.

                  Since when has the opinion of the UN become the measure of truth for you, Bakhtiyar?)
                  But what about Kosovo and Northern Cyprus, or Palestine?
      2. +1
        25 October 2020 23: 27
        You are wrong. An early warning station for American missiles is in Armenia.
    3. +2
      25 October 2020 22: 07
      Quote: Bakht
      I wrote about this yesterday. Russia needs to send troops to the territory of Armenia and take control of the border with Azerbaijan. Everything is within the framework of the CSTO guarantees. But I still haven't heard that Armenia made such a request.

      Since when should Russia be accountable to Azeirbadzhan ?? Isn't there a lot of honor?
      1. -3
        25 October 2020 23: 10
        Russia should not be accountable to Azerbaijan. I wrote about this somewhere? Interesting manner of discussion. Attribute to the interlocutor what he did not say, and then resent.
        I wrote (again) that it is in Russia's interests to place a contingent on the border of Azerbaijan and Armenia. For those who do not understand the Russian language and do not know how to add two and two, I cannot help anything else.
    4. 0
      25 October 2020 23: 43
      oh, don't, let them snowstorm without us!
    5. 0
      26 October 2020 00: 07
      Quote: BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
      figurines - let them fight themselves, and we will congratulate the winner

      But you don't think that Turkey will be the winner and you will congratulate her later near Kazan or somewhere else?
    6. 0
      26 October 2020 00: 09
      Quote: Dear couch expert.
      on the border of Armenia and Karabakh

      Border of Armenia and Karabakh. Border of Azerbaijan and Karabakh.
      That is, in fact, Azerbaijan is fighting not with Armenia, but with Karabakh?

      Directly Azerbaijan is at war with Karabakh (Artsakh) and along the way does not forget to shit on large Armenia. And if it turns out to gobble up more than Armenia should have, then do not even hesitate!
      1. -3
        26 October 2020 01: 02
        Do not gobble up, do not even doubt. Officially, Azerbaijan is not at war with anyone at all.
        1. 0
          27 October 2020 13: 44
          Officially, Azerbaijan is not at war with anyone at all.

          Officially in the whole world, no one is at war with anyone. So ... they shoot for good luck, from different weapons.
    7. -2
      26 October 2020 07: 04
      In general, Russia needs to conclude military treaties with those countries that do not have mutual claims on land with neighboring countries .... Because of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Russia may lose strategic Azerbaijan! If Azerbaijan is hostile to us and considers that we have betrayed it ..... He can enter NATO ... Do you want NATO warships in the Caspian Sea?
      1. 0
        26 October 2020 09: 40
        Quote: Dust
        He can enter NATO

        As Erdogan tells them, so be it.
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. +1
      26 October 2020 12: 18
      Armenia should stop provoking Russia, only people with low self-esteem, weak in spirit and lack of moral foundations do this.
      Think about how you look in the eyes of Russians and other people, your enemies will not respect you for this, which means that they will not stand on ceremony in case of victory.
      You need our help, please contact directly, Karabakh has applied, but it is not a subject of negotiations, it is up to Armenia, which interferes, the Soros or the United States.
      1. rrt
        -1
        26 October 2020 21: 01
        Firstly, Artsakh is a sub / ect of negotiations. In the document on an indefinite truce dated 94, next to the signature of Azherbazhan, there is the signature of the NKR (Artsakh). Secondly, you have some kind of ambivalence; Armenia does not turn to Russia for direct help - it means that it provokes, and if it does, it will start screaming that it wants to play it off with its “partner.” A convenient position, you won’t say anything.
    10. -1
      26 October 2020 12: 29
      And what is the military-political significance of Armenia? Today there was a good article in which it was proposed to get rid of the burden of the post-Soviet republics and let them boil in their own juice. This, of course, guarantees a civil war in all these republics, with elements of Islamism in some, but everyone who wants life, like in Russia, can move to Russia and leave the savages with their nationalism, xenophobia and nepotism. Russia received nothing from these post-Soviet barbaric countries, only negative and froth at the mouth.
      1. 0
        26 October 2020 13: 52
        And where is this article?
        Regardless of what is written there, do you agree to live next door to a violent madman? I am afraid that geopolitics does not share this opinion.
        1. 0
          26 October 2020 14: 35
          https://topcor.ru/17074-pochemu-rossii-nuzhno-poskoree-otkazatsja-ot-postsovetskogo-prostranstva.html

          We have been living with the violent people for 30 years.

          Poor Balts with mental disabilities;

          Ukrainians, who recognized themselves as the navel of the earth and a white bone, who started a civil war, just not to talk about constitutional reform;

          Georgia, who were smart enough to throw artillery against the peacekeepers of Russia and hail across Tskhinvali;

          Kazakhstan, which is drowning in neo-Nazism and "genetic purity of blood";

          Turkmenistan, that an ordinary official was elevated to the level of a demigod and a prophet;

          Tajikistan, which is not much different from Afghanistan and has slipped into an impoverished drug province;

          Kyrgyzstan, where the destroyed education has led to the cultivation of a whole generation of aggressive cattle, who are in no way able to play enough of the Maidan;

          Moldova, where the leaders of the people are quickly trying to sell the country to Romania by the weight of meat that lives in this territory;

          Belarus, led by a stupid combine operator who believed in his modest intellectual capabilities and made a cruel mess with his clumsy election fraud;

          Armenia, which decided to rebuild a gigantic American embassy, ​​drive out Russian bases, and go into the service of some fat old American oligarchs, but saved on the acquisition of missile and cannon air defense, large-scale exercises and the development of new methods of war. And now she is happily leading her nose on the ground by a relatively numerically equal enemy who does not have such a cardinal numerical superiority in technology.

          Yes, adequate countries can be counted on the fingers of one hand: Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Transnistria, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. And then the last three are under Russian protectorate, and if the local princelings completely lose their shores, they will simply be shot like mad dogs.

          We'd better wind up embassies in these countries and leave only consulates for the next 30 years. If after 30 years they remain "Africa", then recognize this territory as wild and forget about them.
          1. 0
            26 October 2020 16: 31
            I read this article on Conte a couple of days ago. It is inherently wrong.
            It is good that Azerbaijan was not included in the list of violent madmen. But here's your phrase

            And now she is happily leading her nose on the ground by a relatively numerically equal enemy who does not have such a cardinal numerical superiority in technology.

            - raises certain doubts about your awareness.
            The approximate population of Armenia is 3 million people, Azerbaijan is 10 million people. The ratio for conventional weapons may be approximately the same (taking into account the defensive zone that Armenia built in a mountainous landscape for 30 years), but in this war, conventional weapons do not solve much.
            ----
            In fact. I have already written many times. Nature abhors a vacuum. Russia left Afghanistan, Poland, the Baltic states, Ukraine and the West came there. The front line (namely the front) runs around the beginning of 1943. The exception is Crimea and Kaliningrad. Yes, and their liberals want to pass. The battles are going on the Mius - front, the enemy is near Leningrad and Smolensk. I will not write further. Allegations of alarmism will begin.
            Don't need a post-Soviet space? There will be an American present.
            1. 0
              26 October 2020 18: 19
              Let it be anyone's. The Americans will immediately arrange a civil massacre there, but their corpses do not bear Russian citizenship and have nothing to do with us. This population has spat in our direction for years. If the Americans want to take these parasites to support or rob them to their cowards, then on the road. The population of these countries showed their unviability in independent voyage, even more, they rushed by leaps and bounds into the Middle Ages. Let their territory become equal to the territory of Afghanistan or Somalia, if they cannot live like human beings. Our task is to close the border, place automatic turrets and forget about their existence.

              For 30 years, all their actions have caused nothing in Russia but disgust. On the part of Russia, no one did anything to them, even at the initial stage there was trade in one wicket, and as a result they acted like ungrateful cattle. If someone's divisions appear on our border again, then preemptively burn Europe, which means that the population of Europe is incurable and worthy only of euthanasia. I think I'm not the only one, an ardent supporter of isolation, it seems that the more bestiality is seen, both in the West and along the borders, the desire to return the "Iron Curtain" will only grow. Fenced off at the western borders from the animal world.
    11. -2
      26 October 2020 18: 35
      The collapse of the USSR began through the fault of Russian bandits in the 80s.
      It was like that. The city of Yakutsk. The drunken Russians in a crowd ran into the students; one had a gun. Then, in protest of this, the Yakut students came out to the square for a spontaneous meeting. They demanded the arrest of those Russian bandits. But the KGB, instead of arresting those. He began to withdraw a battalion of soldiers against the students. Then the angry crowd tore them down.
      After that, many students were arrested and tried. And those Russians were not tried.
      Then again they went out to spontaneous rallies.
      After Yakutia, rallies began in Kazakhstan, then Azerbaijan, the Baltic States and further the USSR was already burning with the flame of riots.

      But if only then the KGB arrested those Russian bandits, then the students would have calmed down and the USSR would have been there today. Or only the Balts retreated.

      Learn the story.
      The Russians themselves are to blame for everything in the collapse of the USSR.

      P, S. perhaps the KGB themselves deliberately provoked the collapse of the USSR in order to be richer than the general secretaries. Who knows.
      1. 0
        27 October 2020 10: 33
        What the hell are you talking about here ???
    12. 0
      27 October 2020 10: 32
      I think there is nothing to do. Observation only.