"Georgia will have to reconcile if we need to transfer troops to Armenia"

October 22 2020 41

Baku and Ankara violated the peace in Transcaucasia in order to take Nagorno-Karabakh from Yerevan by military means, but it is not a fact that they will stop there. Therefore, Moscow should clearly make it clear to its neighbors which state is the strongest in the post-Soviet space. This was stated in an interview NSN Konstantin Zatulin, First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee for CIS Affairs.

During the conversation, the deputy named the probable variants of Russia's reaction to the development of the situation in the region. At the same time, the parliamentarian admitted that he was not completely sure how exactly Moscow should react to what was happening.

For example, if Armenia officially turns to the CSTO for help, then Russia can make a "demonstrative strengthening" of the military potential of this country.

In the form of an appeal to the CSTO due to the need to take measures to protect the Armenian - not Nagorno-Karabakh territory, namely Armenia - with the help of a landing operation. By opening the air blockade

- Zatulin specified.

He believes that Moscow will have to "clearly explain" to Tbilisi that the Georgian side needs to be restrained in the process of transferring forces and equipment of the Russian Armed Forces to Armenia through Georgian airspace.

Georgia will have to reconcile if we need to transfer troops to Armenia

- he stressed.

Zatulin explained that no one encroaches on Georgia's sovereignty. This is simply an extreme measure necessary to preserve the independence of Armenia and prevent the spread of imported jihadists throughout the Caucasus. Moreover, Georgia can suffer from militants no less than other countries, so this is in its interests. He recalled the XNUMX-year-old genocide of Armenians and a new threat to their existence in the region.

There is a threat to the large mass of the Armenian population. We must take action

- added Zatulin.

He partially agreed with the opinion of the head of the Armenian government Nikol Pashinyan that today the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh cannot be resolved at the negotiating table due to the actions of the opposite side. The deputy regrets that the negotiation process is at a standstill, despite Moscow's efforts.

Note that Ankara threatened send its troops to Nagorno-Karabakh, if Baku asks about it. At the same time, Senator Konstantin Kosachev suggested that Yerevan officially appeal to Moscow about the participation of jihadists in the above-mentioned conflict.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

John Hart

-16

23 October 2020 04: 04

Right now the deputy is dunked where necessary, apparently a communist or even worse, Georgia is a strategic partner of NATO
1. Aleksey Glotov
  
  +12
  
  23 October 2020 04: 49
  
  Georgia is a strategic partner of NATO
  
  Don't tell my diapers ... Georgia is a bedding ... what the neighbors tell her, she will do.
  1. John Hart
    
    -18
    
    23 October 2020 04: 51
    
    Well tell me try, another su24 or il28 or s300 choose
    1. Aleksey Glotov
      
      +6
      
      23 October 2020 05: 08
      
      Why waste time on trifles with Yars or Topols at once.
      1. John Hart
        
        -15
        
        23 October 2020 05: 15
        
        Have you ever seen these cars and missiles, but the army is doing business for the sale of fuel with poplar m and yars, well, you just need to burn
        
        Aleksey Glotov
        
        +10
        
        23 October 2020 05: 16
        
        You'd think you've seen them ... you think in cliches John ... bad ... update the training manual.
        
        John Hart
        
        -4
        
        23 October 2020 21: 12
        
        And they will show you one more cartoon, where everywhere the asphalt will put a salary of $ 4000 per month, they will make freedom of speech, and the president will be for 2 terms in life and only 4 years for a term, fantastic truth)))))
    2. alexey alexeyev_2
      
      +1
      
      23 October 2020 18: 24
      
      And what is the IL-28 flying somewhere else？
      1. The comment was deleted.
2. sH, arK
  
  +6
  
  23 October 2020 18: 48
  
  Yes, do not care, whose partner she is there ... the question is different - why the hell is Russia in Armenia? A suitcase without a handle! Does Zatulin advertise himself on HYIP? He's not a complete idiot, so as not to understand that Karabakh needs to be returned by an Azerbaijani ... well, since Pashinyan decided to bend his fingers, he should be punished very roughly, and the Armenians themselves should remember how they will have to pay for anti-Russian policy .. So everything is going very well ...
Aleksey Glotov

+6

23 October 2020 04: 05

Russia's interests in this conflict are above all ... Turkey cannot be allowed to gain strength in this region.
1. John Hart
  
  -13
  
  23 October 2020 04: 54
  
  In which region, that everywhere the asphalt was put into the ry, the vaccine is pricked for free or sold for 12500 and Venezuela is free, or maybe each Russian is given $ 600 every week for the time of loss of work from covid, but every week for $ 600 at the rate of your own how many are your wooden ones, rosia is the people and forgive the people in the humus, what influence, smell, if only
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        rotkiv04
        
        +3
        
        23 October 2020 10: 49
        
        Alexey, do not mock about this dirt, it can only make shit
    2. dimi
      
      +2
      
      23 October 2020 09: 58
      
      so here there are no Russians along the way)))) All invented nicknames for themselves and hiding behind them !!!!
2. Seal
  
  +8
  
  23 October 2020 10: 11
  
  Especially Turkey's strengthening in Azerbaijan should not be allowed. Otherwise, a NATO base will appear in the Caspian, next to Dagestan. Therefore, we urgently need to start ousting Turkey from Azerbaijan so that the Azerbaijanis do not have a false opinion that they owe their success exclusively to Turkey. To begin with, one can raise the question of the exclusion of Armenia from the CSTO. At the same time, stop all deliveries of everything that can be used for war purposes to Armenia. To warn that if Armenia decides to use our SU-30SM against Azerbaijan, then we ourselves will shoot them down. Well, if all this does not help, then yes, you can throw the landing party into battle. Fortunately, the paratroopers have something to show the Armenians. After all, the Armenians never apologized for the dastardly shooting by the Armenian servicemen of our five paratroopers led by Lieutenant Shapovalov in the center of Gyumri in July 1992. None of the firing squad of Armenians was held accountable. On the contrary, General Abrahamyan was soon appointed Deputy Minister of Defense of Armenia.
Binder

-12

23 October 2020 06: 22

Georgia will have to reconcile if we need to transfer troops to Armenia

is a stunningly impudent statement that runs counter to international law.
1. Aleksey Glotov
  
  +7
  
  23 October 2020 08: 26
  
  International law ...and what is it?
  The United States has shown well what the norms of international law are by killing Soleimani.
  1. Eduard Aplombov
    
    +5
    
    23 October 2020 19: 19
    
    International law ... what is it?
    
    these are the norms and claims of the West to Russia when they are not eliminated by the position of Russia in defending its interests
    These norms of the West are known and observed by everyone in relation to NATO towards Yugoslavia and other countries
  2. Binder
    
    -5
    
    23 October 2020 20: 06
    
    Suleimani was the leader of international terrorism, its elimination is part of the fight against terror, so there is no doubt about the legality of this action.
amateur

-5

23 October 2020 06: 53

Zatulin specified. He believes that Moscow will have

It turns out that not only NATO generals can talk nonsense, but also the State Duma deputies.
Bakht

-8

23 October 2020 07: 07

Zatulin is a rare ... specimen.
The most unexpected and unique response from Azerbaijan will be permission for the transfer of Russian troops to Armenia through its airspace.
By the way, in my opinion, this is precisely in the interests of Azerbaijan. I'm afraid only Armenia will not want to have Russian troops on its territory.
No matter how Zatulin had to attend to the withdrawal of the Russian base from Gyumri.
lahudra

-14

23 October 2020 08: 03

Rather, Georgia will have to come to terms with the evacuation of XNUMX Russian prisoners of war from Gyumri. They will treat them to satsivi, sigh and let them pass, for humanitarian reasons.
1. John Hart
  
  -11
  
  23 October 2020 10: 30
  
  Why are they even there, again the Russian Federation made the wrong bet, you have to bet on the number, they bet on zero
Nikolaevich I

0

23 October 2020 11: 59

What is this nonsense? This is the State Duma deputies voicing such a roll? Yo-mine! These are the ones who decide how the country, the people live ?!
Valentine

+4

23 October 2020 12: 03

If we act according to the "norms of international law", then we must leave N. Karabakh alone, as an integral part of Azerbaijan, but if we act according to the "norms" of American democracy, then we must "cut through" the corridor in Georgia with our bombers, and already use it to send our equipment to Armenia and Karabakh, and the bolder we are, the clearer it will be for our "partners"
1. Bakht
  
  -1
  
  23 October 2020 14: 36
  
  For many years now I have been trying to understand the "logic" of such statements.
  Russia should
  
  "cut through" the corridor in Georgia with our bombers, and already through it to let our equipment into Armenia and Karabakh
  
  - for Armenia to go to the West along with Nagorno-Karabakh. After that, Azerbaijan will also leave for the West, for the simple reason that Russia is attacking the territory of Azerbaijan. Georgia is clearly not Russia's ally. And the entire South Caucasus falls out of Moscow's political influence.
  Well then. "Cut the corridors." You know better. Russia will have one "ally" in the South Caucasus, Armenia. Temporarily.
  1. lahudra
    
    0
    
    23 October 2020 14: 47
    
    Even if Armenia does not “go to the west,” it is pointless to keep a 3-strong base there. And we will not protect and annoy the locals. For the XNUMX million sales market? And what is Russia selling besides gas?
  2. Valentine
    
    +5
    
    23 October 2020 17: 23
    
    Quote: Bakht
    For many years now I have been trying to understand the "logic" of such statements.
    Russia should
    
    I, Vakhtiyar, also do not understand in any way, Russia owes everything to everyone - cheap gas, cheap oil, cheap modern weapons, cheap chemical products, and these cheap CSTO ...
    All these our former "brothers" from the former Soviet republics bring us only problems, they hate each other fiercely, just as they hate Russia, but they go to work in whole trains to Russia that they hate, and there are no Russians left in their national formations ... The point is that if Turkey introduces its troops to Azerbaijan (Karabakh), then Russia will introduce its troops to Armenia, if the Armenian side asks for it, and it will certainly do it, and then there will be no time for polite Georgia, Russia has no other way.
    1. Bakht
      
      -4
      
      23 October 2020 18: 21
      
      Azerbaijan has not asked and is not asking for anything from Russia. Armament is bought for hard currency and pays regularly.
      Turkey will not enter Azerbaijan. After all, it was said "IF asks." But I like the idea of Zatulin itself. If Russia is leading troops into the territory of Armenia, then I am FOR all parts of the body. And I even agree that Azerbaijan will help with the transportation of these troops. So Georgia has nothing to do with it. But Zatulin is a fabulous ... specimen. He either does not know or is lying. Armenia will never allow Russian troops to enter the territory of their country. There is a question about the existence of the base in Gyumri. But the idea is good.
      So I understand and accept your indignation. But it has nothing to do with Azerbaijan.
    2. Oleg M.
      
      +1
      
      24 October 2020 02: 59
      
      Why complicate things so much?
      As if the Absheron Peninsula juts out from Baku to the Caspian Sea?
      As if the Azerbaijani oil fields are not in the Caspian?
      As if the Caspian Flotilla of the Russian Navy does not exist in nature?
      Quite sufficient grounds for thoughtful and thorough negotiations with Azerbaijan ... on the presence of Turkey in Zaksvkazie.
      Turks because of Karabakh are definitely not our business ... whoever overpowers, let him take ...
  3. Eduard Aplombov
    
    +2
    
    23 October 2020 19: 26
    
    Do you have problems in your new homeland if you are trying to understand the logic of a distant and hated country for many years?
    the current leaders of these countries may leave and not the countries themselves, they are not needed there, in Europe, these countries, starting from Ukraine, the Baltic states and the rest of the former republics, may temporarily stop close cooperation, and that's all, and allies of Russia are always alone and the same, your mockery may be suitable for fellow tribesmen, but the Russians and me only cause a grin
    1. Bakht
      
      -3
      
      23 October 2020 19: 31
      
      You can keep grinning. As I understand it, only the leaders have left in Georgia, the Baltic States, and Ukraine. And the countries themselves continue to "closely cooperate."
      I least of all "err". I write how I see the situation.
      1. Eduard Aplombov
        
        +1
        
        23 October 2020 21: 35
        
        while the top of these countries, with the support of the West and local bayonets, is dominated by cooperation and peaceful neighborhood is minimal, again you impose your exclusive Jewish opinion, you and observers like you see the situation only under a certain degree and the ideology of those offended by Russia, which does not fall like your countries under the hegemon
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        23 October 2020 21: 49
        
        You specifically confused me with someone. Or did not understand what I am writing about. Especially amused by the "Jewish opinion" and "offended at Russia."
        
        Eduard Aplombov
        
        0
        
        23 October 2020 22: 00
        
        then sorry if I went too far
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        23 October 2020 22: 05
        
        I'm not offenced. Moreover, on the Internet. They are just opinions. By my name you could guess that I am Azerbaijani and live in Azerbaijan. The name Edward is more reminiscent of Armenian
        
        Eduard Aplombov
        
        0
        
        23 October 2020 22: 11
        
        Russian, just nickname
        
        Bakht
        
        +2
        
        23 October 2020 22: 17
        
        Maybe. I do not focus on nationality. It doesn't matter to me at all. Those Armenian friends that I had in my youth remain friends.
        I'm talking about government policy. At the moment, Russian troops on the border of Armenia and Azerbaijan are an urgent need. But Pashinyan is playing around here too. He wants Russian troops in Karabakh (to keep what's left), but not in Armenia. This is understandable. Who from the West will allow him to do this? And Russian troops on the border will not interfere with Azerbaijan at all. And the President of Azerbaijan does not at all exclude such a possibility. After that, peace will reign in the South Caucasus for a long time. Well, 10 years for sure. Maybe more.
        So Zatulin is right in principle. But not to Karabakh, but to the border. Then Azerbaijan will gladly let these peacekeeping troops pass through its territory and will even provide logistics. I wrote about this at the very beginning. But the way Zatulin presented it shows his complete inadequacy.
Azer Hasanli

-1

23 October 2020 20: 40

This Zatulin is an Armenian six who have income from the Armenians. He should have long been held accountable for pushing Russia to anti-constitutional actions in favor of the Armenians. Zatulin is an enemy of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Russia. Russians, who are you waiting for to punish this parsley? He is setting you up for the sake of the Armenians.
I will repeat here my commentary on the topic in terms of educating users who do not know the Karabakh background well:

All historians on this topic know that the Armenians were brought to our lands by Russia in the 19th century from the Ottoman Empire and Iran. There are documents for all this. During the 19th century, a million Armenians were settled in our lands. At the same time, ethnic cleansing was carried out with the eviction of the indigenous Azeri population. So, out of nothing for the Armenians, a pseudo-army and a certain Artsakh were formed. In 1978, in Karabakh, the Armenians unveiled a monument in honor of the 150th anniversary of the invasion of Karabakh from Maragha in Iran. The Bolsheviks created artificial autonomy for the Armenians, violating our rights. Let me remind you that in 1917, 70% of the population in Karabakh were Azeris, and already in the next 1918, armed bands of Dashnaks from the pseudo-army exterminated and expelled the entire Azeri population of Karabakh, where the share of Azeris fell from 70% to 5%. Is it possible in this situation to give autonomy to those who carried out ethnic cleansing?
Barmaley_2

0

23 October 2020 23: 55

In the situation with Armenia, the Russian Federation certainly got a good stretch and, at best, will return to its positions without winning anything. For it, all the outcomes are bad and only a very subtle policy will allow at least not to lose.
The comment was deleted.
Dimon Dimonov

0

29 October 2020 13: 38

After 2008, no one will even ask Georgia ... if it twitches, it will cease to exist ...
abdulhamid

0

29 October 2020 21: 13

Zatulin is a provocateur, not a politician!