"In Crimea, not against": Poles appreciated Zelensky's plans to return the peninsula

October 20 2020 27

On October 20, 2020, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy addressed an annual message to the country's parliament. During his speech, he shared his plans to return the Crimea and Donbass to Ukraine, writes the Polish edition WYDARZENIA w INTERIA.PL.

Those who surrendered Crimea without a fight will be held accountable

- said the head of the Ukrainian state.

He stressed that "it is not about revenge, but about justice."

Peace in Donbass and de-occupation of Crimea are my key priorities

- said Zelensky.

The President explained that after the end of the conflict in Donbass, Kiev will begin the "safe reintegration" of territories that are currently not under his control. As for the amnesty, it will not apply to persons belonging to illegal armed groups in the Donbas.

Polish readers appreciated Zelensky's plans:

Nobody in Crimea wants to live in Banderstadt

- wrote ddr.

Let them think better why so many people from different regions of Ukraine do not want to be ruled by this Kiev government

- stressed fred.

Good joke of the day, Crimea has never been the property of Ukraine. If anyone doubts it, check it out, because our media lie on this topic.

- stated user 1066.

Crimea was, is and will be Russian. That's all

- sure marta.

You have to know how to fight, the Armenians show an example of how to do it. Ukraine fights only with women, children and the elderly

- noted Lwów.

A referendum was held there, and residents voted. Classic public statement

- specified Dobre.

Come on, he's already completely mad. Crimea is, was and will be Russian

- BaK was indignant.

Funny little man from Krivoy Rog and Kvartal 95 microdistrict

- drew attention to GZN.

In Crimea, they say that they are not against reunification with Ukraine, but on one condition - if Ukraine joins Crimea

- he hinted.

The Crimeans themselves decided in a referendum where they want to be. And they decided to return to their native Russia. Crimea became Ukrainian night, nobody asked these people if they wanted to be Ukrainians

- wrote i tyle w temacie.

https://www.president.gov.ua/

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Afinogen

+3

20 October 2020 19: 38

During his speech, he shared his plans for the return of Crimea

Well, in general, the Crimea has long been returned. Now we need to return other lands to Russia, those that Lenin gave it is not clear why. Well this should be given to Ukraine by the Russian land more than then was Ukraine.
1. monman
  
  -4
  
  20 October 2020 20: 22
  
  Now we need to return other lands to Russia
  
  From here in more detail, please ...!
  Return with or without people? If without people, then who will build / plow / sow on these lands, if Russia has the most unclaimed land? Far East, for example. And if with people, then you just can't win - Crimea was a success for the first and last time.
  In addition, it is necessary, at a minimum, that future citizens of the not yet conquered territory would like to live in Russia. And here the most important question is - what can Russia offer them besides the Russian language? If you know the answer, then tell me ...
  1. Afinogen
    
    +1
    
    20 October 2020 21: 02
    
    Return with people or without?
    
    Weird question. Our people are there. I talked with Kharkiv residents, so they said if we held a referendum like in Crimea, 90 percent would vote for joining Russia. I know for sure, and in Odessa they hate the Nazis - Bandera.
    
    Crimea was a success for the first and last time.
    
    I disagree. Grandma Vanga has a prediction. Russia will get stronger, will again gather everyone under its wing, she said that in the future even Bulgaria will be part of Russia.
    1. John Hart
      
      -7
      
      21 October 2020 01: 51
      
      Yeah, how a seer came to Stalin, and he was shot, why asked Beria; I would not have come))))))
    2. monman
      
      -2
      
      21 October 2020 19: 06
      
      Weird question. Our people are there.
      
      Not yours, but Russian speakers. And there are a lot of such Russian speakers in the world. But they are not yours, and, believe me, they do not want to be yours.
      1. Afinogen
        
        +2
        
        21 October 2020 19: 33
        
        Quote: cmonman
        Not yours, but Russian speakers
        
        Ours are those who are with us. We do not divide people by nationality or other characteristics. For example, Crimea, voluntarily expressed a desire to join Mother Russia, and there are no nationalities and all of us are brothers. Or, for example, another example. Having listened to the "Western talkers" we decided to pull west to the Polish fields to farm for a pittance or wash toilets, for God's sake we don't mind, we can only wish good luck.
        
        monman
        
        -3
        
        21 October 2020 19: 45
        
        Ours are those who are with us.
        
        Please define the parameters of “become ours”. Curious to hear ...!
        
        For example, Crimea, voluntarily expressed a desire to join mother Russia.
        
        Do not pretend: the vote of a part of a country to join another country is unconstitutional, and Russia knew about it. When Chechnya wanted to secede from Russia, it was simply bombed. You are lucky that a weak Ukraine did not do this in Crimea.
        
        Afinogen
        
        +1
        
        21 October 2020 20: 04
        
        Quote: cmonman
        When Chechnya wanted to secede from Russia, it was simply bombed.
        
        Why cheat ??? After the first Chechen war, Chechnya practically gained independence and did what it wanted. Nobody interfered in her affairs. But when she attacked Russia (Basayev invaded Dagestan) then they had to end the banditry. Now Chechens live normally and enjoy life.
        
        Quote: cmonman
        You are lucky that weak Ukraine did not do this in Crimea.
        
        What didn't you do? In my opinion, the Crimeans voted unanimously (90%) to join Russia, no one forced them at gunpoint. If they voted against, now Crimea would be a part of Ukraine, everything is simple. But they did not want to live with the fascists in the same state.
        
        free_flier
        
        0
        
        22 October 2020 20: 16
        
        It’s lucky you didn’t climb to bomb the Crimea. Although you would definitely not be here now, at least on the territory of Ukraine.
        
        Ser sash
        
        -3
        
        21 October 2020 20: 21
        
        In your opinion, it is a shame to go to work in a neighboring country, but is it normal that half of Russia is wandering around on duty? Would run to the neighbors, but our poor neighbors.
        
        Afinogen
        
        0
        
        21 October 2020 20: 29
        
        Quote: Ser Sash
        In your opinion, it is a shame to go to work in a neighboring country
        
        And where I wrote such a shame, show me. It looks like you are overwhelmed with emotions and you write without reading.
        
        Ser sash
        
        -1
        
        21 October 2020 20: 35
        
        Having listened to the "western talkers", they decided to pull west to the Polish fields to farm for a pittance or wash toilets,
        
        Afinogen
        
        0
        
        21 October 2020 22: 14
        
        Quote: Ser Sash
        Having listened to the "western talkers", they decided to pull west to the Polish fields to farm for a pittance or wash toilets,
        
        Well, where is the shame I wrote ??? Not only did I not write a shame, I don't even think so. Every work is honorable. If they like to farm for a pittance in the fields or wash toilets is their choice and should be respected, I wished them luck. (if you read my post to the end, you can see it)
        
        bear040
        
        +5
        
        21 October 2020 20: 35
        
        So in the US, 90% of the population does not own real estate, but wanders around the country like gypsies. Where they are invited to work, they go there. What do you Yankees do not regret about this ?!
        
        monman
        
        -2
        
        21 October 2020 22: 34
        
        Well, not 90%, but much less, and secondly, “wherever they invite to work, they go there” and do the right thing, because where they pay, there is “homeland”!
        I moved 4 times, each time my employer paid for my move. The salary was such that he could afford to rent an apartment in a good area. Once I even bought a house, and when I moved to a new job, the new employer would give me days to spend with the sale of my house. And therefore, many Americans do not bother with the purchase, but rent apartments - the salary allows and the hands are free ...
        
        bear040
        
        +5
        
        24 October 2020 09: 36
        
        Well, while you're not married, you can travel, and then ... Then your wife (husband) will start sending you, who have their own work and career, because of your constant travels, fly to hell and children who start having problems with their studies due to constantly changing schools, and each school has its own program, which is slightly, but different, and these differences will begin to hit your child in the kidneys, reducing his academic performance. My father is a military man, I changed school 5 times, so I know what I'm writing about.
        
        free_flier
        
        -1
        
        22 October 2020 20: 19
        
        If on a watch you can get several times more than next to your sofa, then what are the problems? Or s .... it's scary to tear off the sofa, but you want s / n like a shift worker in the north?
      2. bear040
        
        +5
        
        21 October 2020 20: 34
        
        We do not keep those who are not ours on our land, collect socks for 24 hours and let them ride from Russian land even to Pluto on foot, not our problem
2. John Hart
  
  -7
  
  21 October 2020 01: 55
  
  And what was Lenin's name, you know%? I think because of people like you s300 and the bayraktara nuts and shells of Israel and Turkey are harnessing bundles of silk.
  1. Ser sash
    
    0
    
    21 October 2020 20: 22
    
    In Syria and Libya, the Bayraktarians got the most from the Shells.
    Jews burned, but they burned cunningly, from behind the hill.
John Hart

-9

21 October 2020 01: 50

With the collapse of the USSR, the borders were clearly defined, the agreements were approved, the states were approved, and now they spat on everyone and everything and using a nuclear club stabbed the brotherly people with a knife in the back, right now they will surrender the Armenians, because they are afraid of ankara su24, they showed it, they were a boar for mardas, and they answered: WE will not buy your tomatoes anymore))))) and the funny thing is that Turkish tomatoes were driven through Belarus, this is the kind of Belarusian people ..
1. rotkiv04
  
  +3
  
  21 October 2020 12: 17
  
  you have problems understanding these treaties, and no one asserted the state, they thought it up on the outskirts and decided that this is your land, in fact, this is the land of the Russian Empire, that is, Russian, give everything to a shred, you will only get the Galicia
  1. The comment was deleted.
2. bear040
  
  +7
  
  21 October 2020 20: 40
  
  Oh, there is no need to write fairy tales about the brotherly people! Russia recognized the borders of Ukraine within the borders of the Ukrainian SSR for a reason, but with reservations 1) Ukraine had to maintain a neutral status, and Ukraine gathered in NATO under Yushchenko, violating an agreement with the Russian Federation! 2) Ukraine signed an agreement of friendship with the Russian Federation and immediately began to support Dudaev, Maskhadov, Saakashvili, violating the agreement! So who stuck a knife in the back of whom, not the rotten descendants of Mazepa, eh ?!
3. Dec919
  
  +1
  
  22 October 2020 12: 28
  
  during the collapse of the USSR, a referendum was held, as a result of which 90% of the population answered no to collapse !!! further actions to recognize any borders or territories by which individual, albeit high-ranking citizens, are not legitimate and not legal
The comment was deleted.
1. kot711
  
  +1
  
  21 October 2020 17: 56
  
  Collect several anonymous comments of a certain direction and emboss a loud headline
  
  Was he supposed to dig up Bandera's comments?
  1. Natan bruk
    
    -3
    
    21 October 2020 19: 07
    
    And what does "Bandera" mean? In general, I mean that this way of presenting "spiritually uplifting" articles is smart.
serggb

0

21 October 2020 20: 04

Banderlandia sounds better than Banderstadt.