How and how can Russia repel a possible NATO aggression

October 19 2020 21

Recently, the Pentagon has increasingly heard statements about a potential breakthrough of Russia's air borders. So, according to the American Air Force General Jeffrey Harigyan, to successfully overcome the air defense of the Kaliningrad region, the United States will need 225 strategic bombers. Now the States have 140 vehicles of this class.

Of course, all this looks like "manilovism". But the more frequent interceptions of NATO "strategists" near our borders and the active exercises of the West, outplaying the options for a massive missile strike on Russia, cannot but be alarming.

As a result, it is precisely the threat from NATO that is growing every day that is the main incentive for the development of domestic air defense systems. How do we respond to a potential attempt to break through our air borders? Let's figure it out.

Tomorrow of the Russian defense is associated with the newest S-500 Prometheus air defense system. The system will be as versatile and unified as possible. The S-500 has the widest range of damage, ranging from aircraft and ballistic missiles to satellites in low orbits. The system is capable of working on targets at a distance of up to 600 km and an altitude of up to 200 km.

The new brainchild of the Almaz-Antey concern will be used in combination with the S-350V Vityaz and S-400 Triumph air defense systems. The anti-space defense complex A-235 "Nudol" will work in conjunction with the latter. In turn, the latter will be covered by the short-range air defense system S-300 "Pantsir".

In general, the missile defense system is one of our main advantages over the United States. Today, air defense and missile defense forces are monitoring approximately 800 objects around the clock. But is it realistic to cover all the borders of our vast Motherland?

In Japan and South Korea, in Hawaii and Guam, impressive armed forces of a potential enemy are deployed. In addition, American aircraft carrier groups regularly serve in the waters of the Pacific Ocean.

In this regard, a "radar dome" has already been deployed in the Far East, consisting of the newest stations "Sky-M" and "Podlet".
An attack from the South is unlikely, but it shouldn't be written off either.

In general, it is too early to speak about the complete impenetrability of our borders. However, given the scale of funding aimed at re-equipping the Russian army, one can hope that in the near future we will close all borders with air defense and will not leave the enemy even the slightest chance to play the card with a massive air attack.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Valentine

0

19 October 2020 11: 45

I just can't understand that Europe and the United States have created a "Suicide Club", and during the future, planned nuclear apocalypse, they think to sit out in their underground bungalows in Detroit, or in Miami? After all, as the Chernobyl handicraft disaster shows us, and this is precisely the creation of the US special services, it will take at least 50 years to reclaim the land and the entire ecology of the contaminated area, and even then not completely, and the Yankees cannot live in underground caves for half a century. will be able to, but we will have no other choice, i.e. "everything is rubbish" ..... Most likely they are just checking us for "lice", and rattling weapons at our borders on the verge of a foul, because their arms sales to the same NATO costs a lot of money for members of this organization, which is in the hands of Washington, and is the most filling the US budget, and this is about 47% of the sales of all world arms exports ..... Is it really there, in the US Congress, sitting the same insane as their McCain, or the same Biden ???? ??
steelmaker

0

19 October 2020 11: 50

And I liked the last phrase in the video:

"... you need to create life for people that would be worth protecting."

I can imagine, what if the war and the people are given weapons? And I think that before they die, people will start settling scores with housing and communal services, officials, bosses and business owners, someone with doctors, someone with teachers? Because now the state is not educating patriots, but educating the consumer. And in schools the topic of the Second World War is studied poorly. And if they give the information correctly, then many questions will arise. For example, why is the Mausoleum closed on May 9? Why is Stalin, as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, almost nowhere mentioned and his services not made public? There has been no war for 75 years. And life does not suit me, so as not to die of hunger. And how about a salary of 12130 rubles and a pension of 11200 rubles? So we think: "Only there would be no war."
1. Valentine
  
  +1
  
  19 October 2020 13: 42
  
  Quote: steel maker
  There has been no war for 75 years.
  
  And I somehow doubt your words that there is no war ....... It has not ended since the formation of imperial Russia, the Tatars with the Pechenegs, the Poles, the Swedes, the French, the Japanese, the Germans , then the Finns, then again the Germans, and now, after the victory in 1945 by the USSR over the collective fascist Europe, which cannot come to terms with the fact that our people brought the whole of Europe to its knees, the war continues, only in a different hypostasis, where hot. where cold, with dirty psychological insinuations, attacks, sanctions and "color revolutions", and the prosperity and well-being of any country always depends on the peaceful and calm environment around it, in the community of other countries ... Vaughn, the United States is already complaining, that we have nothing to impose sanctions on, but they really want to bite us ...
  
  Quote: steel maker
  And life doesn't suit me
  
  And here you are the master of your own destiny - go to deputies, to prosecutors, to judges, get a job as a pilot on an aircraft, there is a shortage of them in our aviation, and they also make good money in the oil and gas fields ... Stalin, do not knock about him here, such nonsense is one of the outstanding leaders of the USSR, under whom our country defeated fascism, and he will forever remain in the memory of the people, and just do not bla-la about exaggerated repressions of the 37th, and the "cult of personality" - these are all the intrigues of Nikita Sergeevich, the main signer of the "execution lists".
  1. steelmaker
    
    0
    
    20 October 2020 21: 43
    
    And here you are the master of your own destiny - go to the parliament
    
    And Chubais is not a relative to you? Or maybe you studied with him at HES? Otherwise, you paraphrased his phrase in your own way:
    
    If you're smart, why aren't you rich?
    
    Do not grease someone else's glory, come up with something of your own!
    1. 123
      
      +1
      
      20 October 2020 22: 15
      
      In general, this phrase
      
      If you are so smart, why are you so poor?
      
      Warren Buffett said for the first time. True, it sounded a little different -
      
      "If you are all so smart, why am I rich?"
      
      She was immediately picked up and she went to the people where mainly people began to trump her, whose IQ is not high and their pocket is empty, but you need to somehow shut up your opponent.
      
      Do not exaggerate the merits of Chubais. It's hard for me to add something to the quote
      1. steelmaker
        
        -2
        
        22 October 2020 21: 10
        
        In general, this phrase "Do not ask, do not dance", when Chubais said this, he did not say whose words it was. Better to hire a lawyer for Efremov, he will at least pay. And if Valentine does not have enough education to answer, then let him be silent in .... To defend mediocrity for a gift - do not respect yourself!
2. John Hart
  
  -4
  
  21 October 2020 00: 03
  
  75 years have passed that there is nothing more to remember and why do they not say that only thanks to the help of the West and won the war, and then this hand of the West was basely bitten, this is taught in school?
amateur

-2

19 October 2020 12: 22

So, according to the American Air Force General Jeffrey Harigyan, to successfully overcome the air defense of the Kaliningrad region, the United States will need 225 strategic bombers.

But Boris Yeltsin dreamed

“The operation is very, very carefully prepared. For example, if there are 38 snipers, then each sniper has a target, and he sees this target all the time.

Conclusion: you need to drink less
Jacques sekavar

+2

19 October 2020 14: 20

more frequent interceptions of NATO "strategists" at our borders

Violators of the border - try to force them to surrender, if they refuse - use weapons to kill.

active exercises of the West, playing up the options for a massive missile strike on Russia

To conduct exercises not far from NATO in the Far East and North Caucasus, but in Karelia, Pskov and Rostov regions, in Crimea, with an imitation of a missile strike on NATO countries. Rocket launches should be carried out not to Kamchatka, but to the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea.

Tomorrow of the Russian defense is associated with the newest air defense system S-500

1. The weak defends, therefore defensive tactics only provoke aggression.
2. No matter how perfect the defense is, there will always be a weak spot in it.
3. Almost all the latest weapons, including the S-500, are concentrated in the European part, but do you need to protect the territories beyond the Urals?
4. The S-500 is not a panacea, the United States is betting on space, including the Moon, and this must be borne in mind.
5. The main emphasis should be on missile, laser, electromagnetic, wave and other weapons and electronic warfare systems capable of destroying enemy space objects and blocking all types of communication systems on earth and in space.

we can hope that in the near future we will close all borders with air defense

1. To close the entire border with air defense means, costs comparable to the entire GDP of the Russian Federation will be required.
2. To close the entire border, it takes time and not a little, but for now they will close it: firstly, the air defense system will have time to become outdated, and secondly, new means of attack will appear.
Natan bruk

-1

19 October 2020 16: 54

But it’s not clear - why should the damned West attack Russia? Why bear trillions of costs for the war, lose millions of people, for what? Resources? So they have their own, but what they need, they buy at a reasonable price. Even if theoretically Imagine that they want to conquer Russia, how much will it cost to take on the maintenance of 146 million, modernization of infrastructure, social services, etc. to Western standards? No resources will recoup this. Russia is simply very much afraid. Just like Russia is afraid of the West. there are more opportunities to prepare for an alleged Russian attack, while Russia does not have a Western one, since the days of the Internal Affairs Directorate are long gone and Russia generally has no allies left.
1. Jacques sekavar
  
  +1
  
  19 October 2020 18: 26
  
  Only now it is not clear - why should the accursed West attack Russia?
  
  Ask the former Secretary of State H. Clinton and her boss Obama about this. The secretary voiced the goal of defragmenting the Russian Federation, which no one canceled, and Obama boasted of how he smashed the Russian economy to shreds.
  
  Why bear trillions of costs for the war, lose millions of people, for what?
  
  As former Fed Chairman Bernankin Ben said in one of his speeches, military orders play a significant role in the economy - research and development, industrial production, employment, political and economic influence, etc.
  
  how much will it cost to undertake the maintenance of 146 million, modernization of infrastructure, social services, etc. to Western standards?
  
  How much does the United States spend on the maintenance of dependent states and its colonies in Africa, Asia, South America, and which country with their help has reached Western standards and living standards?
  
  Russia is simply very much feared.
  
  It is hard to remember when the United States had not fought a war to establish "democracy" in one corner or another of the world - every year for decades. They used atomic weapons, burned them with napalm, used ammunition with depleted uranium, did not destroy chemical weapons arsenals, unlike the Russian Federation, military bases and secret (!) Biological laboratories around the world, ships and aircraft constantly patrol the borders of the Russian Federation, exercises with imitation of a nuclear strike, etc. .d. directly naming against whom it is all directed. Isn't this a reason for the Russian Federation to be afraid and to strengthen its defenses?
  The Russian Federation does not conduct naval and other exercises off the coast of the United States, in the Mexican or Hudson Gulf, for example, and the United States demonstratively holds many thousands of kilometers from its borders, including the Black, Baltic, Barents, Japanese and other seas.
  So it is not necessary from a sore head to a healthy one. The military strategy of the Russian Federation, unlike the US one, does not provide for a preemptive nuclear strike against anyone, including the United States.
  
  It's just that the latter (the West) has more opportunities to prepare for the alleged Russian attack, while Russia does not have the Western one, since the times of the Internal Affairs Directorate are long gone and Russia generally has no allies left.
  
  Is the total mobilization, industrial, military and any other potential of the United States, its European protectorate, allies and dependent states around the world ten times greater than the potential of the Russian Federation, which has no allies, and is this also a reason to fear an attack by the Russian Federation?
  1. Natan bruk
    
    0
    
    19 October 2020 19: 55
    
    The same cheap demagogic propaganda. The USA and NATO countries will agree to lose millions of people and destroy their countries? For what? And what "colonies" Can we compare the standard of living in Russia and Germany, France, England? This is the question of "what have we achieved." And about Clinton - this is the same replicated fake as with Thatcher's alleged statement.
2. 123
  
  +1
  
  20 October 2020 22: 37
  
  Only now it is not clear - why should the accursed West attack Russia?
  
  It's simple. The system is arranged so that the economy must constantly expand, all the time to absorb and master something, otherwise a crisis comes. You can hold out for some time on "artificial respiration" (maintaining demand for debt). What we are currently observing. But this is a temporary solution.
  
  Why bear trillions of costs for the war, lose millions of people, for what? Resources? So they have their own, but what they need, they buy at a fair price.
  
  First, not all. Secondly, if successful, the price can change pleasantly or everything will be obtained for free.
  
  Even if you theoretically imagine that they want to conquer Russia, how much will it cost to take on the maintenance of 146 million, modernization of infrastructure, social services, etc. to Western standards?
  
  Are you serious? Maybe you have a temperature? What content? What kind of social modernization? What are the standards? There they are "Sumerians" right now standardizing ... benefactors .... Believers in such nonsense, we have an endangered species. If the liver of a whiskey with coconut withstands, then they, like Lesha "Novichok", begin to eat with spoons.
  
  Russia is simply very much feared, just as Russia is feared of the West. It's just that the latter has more opportunities to prepare for the alleged Russian attack, while Russia does not have the Western one, since the days of the Internal Affairs Directorate are long gone and Russia generally has no allies left.
  
  And what are they so afraid of? After all, say yourself - there are fewer opportunities ... Our allies have not gone anywhere, the army and navy are in place. And the rest ... let these backsliders serve there. By the way, one of them considers Jerusalem to be his
  1. Natan bruk
    
    -2
    
    21 October 2020 01: 47
    
    I'm not interested in conspiracy.
Tektor

+1

20 October 2020 17: 13

The first weapon in war is sabotage. So they must be taken into account from the very beginning. Especially in cyberspace. The second means - shock UAVs, including "kamikaze". Drone swarm attacks. This is very serious, and without solving this problem, it is impossible to avoid large losses. With the swarm of UAVs, the electronic warfare systems Lever, Mercury and many others must cope. They must be included in each division, operating around the clock ...
Yurets

0

20 October 2020 23: 46

And Siluanov does everything to get the RF Armed Forces to kneel in front of the mattress mats. Apparently, the minister connects his future with tan
John Hart

-3

21 October 2020 00: 00

Yes, even with 1000 create how many of them there will be, one at the parade, or su 67 which will never get into the troops, and your officials keep everything in the west, it will simply be quietly and peacefully sold to the Russian Federation
Handle

0

16 November 2020 14: 49

https://www.infox.ru/usefull/297/244231-amerika-na-muske-u-moskvy-rossijskij-radar-na-kube-ronaet-samolety-ssa
The comment was deleted.
Alexander Bezuglov

-1

25 November 2020 13: 40

How and how can Russia repel a possible NATO aggression

Neither can it. This is not possible without a developed economy, machine tool building and education. In addition, there are real estate and the children of our leaders. Their money is there. Who will fight against himself?
Praskovya

0

7 December 2020 04: 33

Russia as usual:
- WILL EXPRESS CONCERN.
Praskovya

0

9 January 2021 15: 26

NATO aggression can be repelled by shooting everyone who is now in power. Plus the oligarchs. For NATO aggression is all the corrupt powers that be bought, sold and bought again. As one smart man said: You can sometimes fight the state when you cannot buy their power.