Turkey refused to consider the ceasefire in Karabakh as the final solution to the issue


On October 9, 2020, Baku and Yerevan at consultations in Moscow agreed on a ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh from 12:00 (11:00 Moscow time) on October 10 for humanitarian purposes, as well as an exchange of prisoners and bodies of the dead. At the same time, Ankara refused to consider the said ceasefire as the final solution to the issue, as stated in the communique circulated by the Turkish Foreign Ministry.


The declared ceasefire is an important first step, but it will not replace a final decision.

- said in the official message of the department.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry clarified that Ankara treats Baku's problems with understanding and will support it "both at the negotiating table and on the battlefield." Therefore, the Turks will approve of any action that the Azerbaijanis take.

In turn, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said that in the conflict with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh, he will go to the end anyway. The Azerbaijani leader said this in an interview. RBC.

Our goal remains unchanged - the restoration of the integrity of Azerbaijan, recognized by the entire world community, the return of Azerbaijanis to the places of their original traditional residence.

- stressed Aliyev.



The President of Azerbaijan specified that the phase of political settlement will come when Yerevan is "committed to the ceasefire regime." After that, the “forcing to negotiate” phase will end.

At the same time, the Azerbaijani media disseminated information that "the victorious army of Azerbaijan liberated the city of Hadrut from the Armenian invaders." How far this fits into the framework of the truce is difficult to say.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. passing by Offline passing by
    passing by (passing by) 10 October 2020 20: 30
    0
    Is there peace in Hadrut now? means a truce laughing
  2. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 10 October 2020 20: 34
    -1
    Directly new Schicklgruber imagines himself, though bald, bangs will not work, but spread the dirt under his nose. This balabol already seemed to be taking Hadrut, although then our correspondents made a report from there and everything somehow sagged from the MGIMO graduate
    1. passing by Offline passing by
      passing by (passing by) 10 October 2020 20: 49
      -1
      why should he bangs? he, like Pashinyan, does not replace Monica Lewinsky laughing
      1. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
        rotkiv04 (Victor) 10 October 2020 20: 51
        -1
        and you are a big original laughing
  3. Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 10 October 2020 20: 41
    -1
    Quote: rotkiv04
    Directly new Schicklgruber imagines himself, though bald, bangs will not work, but he spread the dirt under his nose

    Are you showing your education again? There was no historical person with the name Shiklsruber. Losers!
    1. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
      rotkiv04 (Victor) 10 October 2020 20: 44
      -1
      .. study -

      Alois Schicklgruber, 1837-1903) - father of Adolf Hitler, who bore the surname of his single mother until 1876, when Johann Nepomuk Güttler acknowledged his paternity, mistakenly recorded as Hitler.
  4. Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 10 October 2020 21: 02
    +2
    Quote: rotkiv04
    .... learn -

    Alois Schicklgruber, 1837-1903) - father of Adolf Hitler, who bore the surname of his single mother until 1876, when he acknowledged his paternity, and less read left-wing sources such as, mistakenly recorded as Hitler.

    Hitler NEVER bore the name Schicklgruber! Learn history! And read less left-wing sources such as cyclists.
    1. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
      rotkiv04 (Victor) 10 October 2020 21: 07
      -1
      what do you do, the essence does not change, judging by your reaction, you can be seen as a big fan of Aloizovich
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 10 October 2020 21: 12
    +1
    Quote: rotkiv04
    what do you do, the essence does not change, judging by your reaction, you can be seen as a big fan of Aloizovich

    Alois Schicklgruber changed his last name to Hitler in 1876, Adolf was born in 1889 ... and NEVER had a different last name than Hitler.
    1. Binder Online Binder
      Binder (Miron) 10 October 2020 21: 19
      +1
      And why is this audience so partial to the name Schicklgruber? What kind of interest were they - both Schicklgruber and Hitler were XNUMX% Austrians, had nothing to do with the Jews. laughing
  6. Alexzn Offline Alexzn
    Alexzn (Alexander) 10 October 2020 21: 23
    +1
    This is a form of an allusion to the profound knowledge of history among p.t. listeners. :)
  7. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 10 October 2020 21: 38
    -1
    So Hadrut was released the day before yesterday. And today the Armenians tried to fight him off. This morning they are being fired upon. Where the Armenian correspondents did their reportage from is on their conscience.
  8. boriz Online boriz
    boriz (boriz) 10 October 2020 22: 22
    0
    I look forward to being explained once again that Turkey is not at all involved in this conflict.
  9. Rostislav Offline Rostislav
    Rostislav (Rostislav) 11 October 2020 09: 51
    -1
    Has Erdogash registered himself as the supreme judge, to sort out the conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis? New ... from the mountain, imagining himself ...
    It is clear that this conflict is useful to him. He will not inflate it - he will simply make every effort not to let it fade.