The USA is preparing a war against Russia: concrete evidence

71

To our great regret, for quite a long time, even the most competent analytical reviews, belonging to domestic authors and devoted to the aggressive militaristic preparations of the United States, are invariably crowned with a phrase of approximately the following content: “But with all this, American“ hawks ”in open armed confrontation with our country, of course, they won't dare ... "

Much interesting follows from this maxim: for example, the fact that all the militant anti-Russian rhetoric is pure bluff, and idiots are sitting in the White House and Congress, throwing billions of dollars down the drain "for a great life." The Pentagon is inhabited by the most peaceful generals in the world, and in their thoughts they do not have to put into practice all those weapons, in the development and production of which this money is invested. However, is this really the case?



He who has eyes, let him see ...


Alas, the firm conviction that the mere presence of nuclear weapons on both sides of a potential conflict, combined with the absence in nature of anti-missile defense systems that are effective not even 100, but at least 90%, automatically makes military action between Russia impossible. and the USA as such is playing a very cruel joke with many experts. Perceiving this postulate as an axiom, they simply begin to ignore the completely obvious facts that testify to just the opposite. Moreover, such fundamental moments as the complete incompatibility of our two countries (ideological, ideological, civilizational nature), which the opposing side simply cannot "bypass" in the process of building a new world order, which is happening literally now and before our eyes, are completely dismissed. The conventional "collective West" for centuries tried to destroy our country and did it, first of all, by military methods.

After the cruel defeat in the Second World War, the confrontation was transferred to a different plane, in which, alas, our enemy was able to win. However, the revival of Russia and the repeated failure of the West to return it "to the true path" using non-military methods ("color revolutions", bribery of the elites, etc.) inexorably pushes our opponents to the world-old "last argument of kings". There is simply no other way out, and no one intends to give Russia a chance for independent development - it is too dangerous. All this is, so to speak, a geopolitical alphabet, a general part of the question. Well, now is the time to move on to the most detailed and specific examples that clearly illustrate it.

Not so long ago, a very intriguing military exercise took place at one of the US Army training grounds in Yuma. Their code name sounds pathetic and mysterious - "Project Convergence" (it is good, however, that at least not the traditional "Terrible gopher" or "Irresistible urge"). It means that the action unfolding in the Arizona desert was supposed to simulate the "war of the future" - of course, the way the Pentagon sees it. What was the main legend of the teachings, there is no doubt. Here are just a couple of specific tasks that were practiced by the servicemen of the American troops in the process of these maneuvers. For example, the destruction of the Russian missile-cannon system of the Pantsir air defense system. As reported by specialized local publications like Breaking Defense, traditional Yankees drones, some "superguns" (what exactly they are talking about is completely unclear) and "the latest ground robots" were used for this. Here there is much more specifics - according to the report cited in the media, we are talking about LIDAR combat robots equipped with the Aided Target Recognition function, which provides quick recognition of the enemy, and above all, his military equipment.

These mechanical killers, for all their external frivolity (according to eyewitnesses, they resemble "militarized golf carts"), are quite serious weapons, since they are equipped with their own UAVs and guided missiles. According to the cited report, these two "carts" were able to quite successfully penetrate into the territory of the "conditional enemy" town and destroy its manpower with a missile salvo, practically point-blank. After that, having noted and identified the enemy armored vehicles, using a satellite communication system, they provided an artillery strike on it. Tellingly, the role of this technique was played by Russian T-72 tanks. As one of the leaders of the maneuvers, US Army General Richard Ross Coffman, said, the Pentagon conducted them "for a large-scale test of their future plans of war." The use of other equipment as targets, except for the Russian one, is not reported ...

Specific goals are already being selected


Tellingly, similar trainings are conducted by the American armed forces not only and not so much on their own territory as on the borders of our country, and in fact along their entire length. So, this month, the US Army is planning to conduct live firing with the use of M270 multiple launch rocket systems at one of the Estonian training grounds, some hundred kilometers away from the Russian borders. For those who are not in the know, let me remind you that this MLRS can, in addition to conventional unguided rockets, also use ATACMS tactical missiles, which have a range of several hundred kilometers. That is, in essence, the shelling of Russian territory will be practiced. Threatening maneuvers of American strategic bombers, which have recently been hovering around our homeland like vultures, have already become the talk of the town. "Providing moral pressure on Moscow?" "Warning or containment of Russia?" No matter how it is. The true goals of these flights are not hidden in the United States itself - in any case, the local media talks about them in a completely open text.

So, Forbes frankly relishes the fact that the actions of the B-52Hs, who "presented" to us from the British Air Force base in Fairlond, were nothing more than "practicing strikes on the Russian enclave in Kaliningrad", taking into account the S-300 air defense systems guarding it and S-400. For the next Drang nacht Osten, the West needs the Suwalki Corridor, and in order to master it, all possible options are being considered, including the use of tactical nuclear weapons.

However, the point is not just Kaliningrad, which is sitting with a bone in NATO's throat. According to the same publication, the B-52H flights over the Crimea were aimed not only at imitating its bombing. As the authors of Forbes (referring to some "knowledgeable sources" in the military department) are sure, the global task of these air maneuvers is much larger, and the B-52s perform in it only a distracting role of "decoy". The main “work” was to be done by the British RC-135 spy planes accompanying these “flying fortresses”. It was they who were tasked, no less, but to open the entire system of our over-the-horizon radars that guard the Russian sky, and determine the degree of their effectiveness, as well as the speed of interaction with fighter aircraft of domestic air defense.

Have you estimated the breadth of scope? The game is no longer just going big, but at the most that neither is the maximum rate! They "probe" for the purpose of subsequent hacking or destruction, not any section of Russia's air defense, but its foundations, main components. Here, perhaps, we are no longer talking about a "point" or "limited" blow, but about the desire to wipe us off the face of the earth altogether. At the same time, of course, there are outlined, first of all, those places where the United States can try to solve the matter with a single crushing attack, which, according to the plan of the strategists there, should completely demoralize our militarypolitical leadership, break him and deprive him of the will to retaliate "strike of retaliation." Kaliningrad and Crimea are clearly considered as such "critical points". At the same time, the "allies" of the American army are assigned the unattractive, but absolutely inevitable role of "cannon fodder" - as is the case not only with Ukraine, but also, for example, with Bulgaria, whose skies have been "patrolled" by American F-28 fighters since September 15.

Russia is not just being closed - it has already been closed in a ring. This is done for purposes that do not allow double interpretation. The US Army completely and completely controls Ukraine, is in charge, as at home, in Georgia and the Baltic States. Its military contingents will soon be permanently deployed not only in Poland, but also, most likely, in Lithuania itself - in any case, the country's Defense Minister Artis Pabriks made an official request to the Pentagon. The enemy is getting closer - and this is an irrefutable fact ... As far as we know, not so long ago, the US Strategic Command received an official request from the White House about how quickly nuclear weapons stored today in special storage facilities can be reactivated and placed on board strategic bombers and submarines ... The document mentions that such measures are being worked out "in case of termination of the Treaty on the reduction of strategic offensive arms." At the same time, everyone understands very well that under the current conditions the chance of extending this agreement is not just negligible, but is approaching absolute zero.

Well, and the last thing I would like to mention in conclusion. Those who categorically speak of "the impossibility of a war between the United States and Russia" are missing only two things. The first is that the forces ruling this country measure everything and everyone in this world only and exclusively on money. Any steps Washington is taking now - from the transfer of its troops to the Russian borders to the development and introduction of new types of weapons, initially "sharpened" exclusively for the war with our country, are extremely costly measures. The Americans are simply incapable of wasting that kind of money without specific intentions and goals ... The second bitter delusion: “those who are now making plans to defeat our country must, absolutely must, realize that there will be no winners in this war”. Century after century, all the conquerors who sought to crush our Motherland were fully confident about their own chances of victory - contrary to objective reality and the experience of their predecessors. No arguments of reason could keep neither Napoleon Bonaparte nor Adolf Hitler from going to the East, for whom this adventure ended with the destruction of their empires and personal death. There were no nuclear weapons then? And it was easier for Hitler in May 1945 ?!

Each new enemy that goes to Russia is convinced that he will succeed. And there is only one way to get rid of this illusion - by knocking it out of the next "conqueror" and "conqueror".
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -11
    5 October 2020 11: 10
    God, what kind of blizzard have I just read? However, this is typical for all the writings of Necropny. Only those who are very stubborn can take them seriously ...
    1. +3
      5 October 2020 11: 53
      it was a hint ... Feed Russia, or the Ukrainians will run away to the American aggressor.
      1. 0
        13 October 2020 07: 24
        Feed Russia, or the Ukrainians will run away to the American aggressor.

        But figurines, eat cookies
  2. -9
    5 October 2020 11: 33
    It is clear that they want to lower the ruble even more, and offer the population to work for 17 rubles, and so that there are no questions to the bankrupt government, it is necessary to whip up military hysteria! Let us rally brothers and sisters around the president and his oligarchs.
    Question to the author, the elite has already returned their offspring to Russia, or else their families will become hostages of the American-fascists?
    The fact that the Americans are training to destroy the Carapace is not a secret that the Carapaces are armed, mostly by the enemies of the Americans, so they are training. The author invites the Americans to train in the destruction of the Patriots? Likewise with the T-72.
    We, too, would train on the Abrams and patriots if they were with us.
    Well, the author's revelations about the LIDAR robot are simply deadly, its adoption means 100% the beginning of a war between the Russian Federation and the United States, because this robot will defeat everyone and everything.
    Of course, the fighting efficiency of Shoigu's mortgage army is low, only the CIS countries can be its opponents, the mortgage army is no longer pulling against Turkey and Poland. But there are nuclear weapons, and so far they are saving.
    The Russian Federation can collapse under a heap of economic problems, by itself, without any aggression from outside. The guarantor of the slide into economic disaster is Putin and his political and economic course.
    1. +3
      5 October 2020 12: 00
      the fighting efficiency of Shoigu's mortgage army is low, only the CIS countries can be its opponents, the mortgage army is no longer pulling against Turkey and Poland.

      - you have too misconception about either the Russian army, or the Polish and Turkish, or about the army in general ... Therefore, you write such nonsense. If this were at least half true, sanctions would not be imposed against the Russian Federation, problems would not be created for us at the borders, etc., and so forth, this is done only to those who cannot be influenced by force.
      The army of the Russian Federation in its current state, even with conventional weapons, will definitely put the entire European NATO on a par with the Turks and Poles. And they understand this, unlike you. Therefore, they behave the way they do ... Poland, he was scared! Ugh ... God forgive me ... wassat
      According to the analysis of the Poles themselves, made due to recent events, at the moment they are not able to independently, if necessary, quickly and successfully neutralize even the army of Belarus.
      1. -3
        5 October 2020 18: 42
        Sanctions were imposed for Crimea and Donbas, comrade, the mortgage army had nothing to do with it, it was not because of it that the sanctions were imposed. If Moldova or Romania captured the Crimea, then they would have been introduced against them. There is the Helsinki Act on the inviolability of European borders. Yes, many countries do not like the borders, but if it (the act) is not observed, then we will again slide into the European war and that their act was not adopted. We violated it, for which we paid.

        ... The Russian army in its current state, even with conventional weapons, will definitely put the entire European NATO on a par with the Turks and Poles ...

        - as I understand it, you are most likely a former or current military man and it is unpleasant for you to realize that your activities and the activities of the entire Ministry of Defense are picking in the sandbox and participating in all kinds of Shoigush shows. In addition to the Strategic Missile Forces, everything is at the level of fighting back and or conquering Moldova, part of Ukraine, Kazakhstan, etc., the great military Powers. If Poland or Turkey, the rest of NATO, without interfering, will only help with intelligence and high-precision ammunition, then the result is obvious. Well, you can indulge yourself about the "invincible and legendary mortgage army."
        Please note that the data on losses in the Ministry of Defense are closed, there are already many coffins coming. And in Syria there are no ground forces, only to provide and direct the air force and guard our base there. Why do you think? Yes, because the infantry will be smashed and the coffins will be pulled home, all sorts of Soldier's Mothers will crawl out, the press, that is, they are dear to themselves. And there is no motivation and no real weapons, not biathlon and no training.
        You have only one concern for the military, to serve until the length of service and get a mortgage apartment.
        1. +5
          5 October 2020 19: 28
          Quote: Cudgel
          Act of Helsinki on the inviolability of European borders

          Well, and how does this act of your birth in 1975 agree with the defeat of the SFRY and the rejection of Kosovo from Yugoslavia in 1998, and no one is sanctioned for this, and you are here about the Crimea in 2014 la-la on our ears, or you according to the principle, we play here, we do not play here, they wrapped the herring here ...
          1. -6
            5 October 2020 20: 35
            In 1991, all republics left the USSR. In the same 1991, four republics left the SFRY. In the SFRY, unlike the USSR, this way out was not recognized and began a war with them, with varying degrees of success. That is, both there and there new states were created. Regardless of whether there was a war between them or not, they were drafted by the UN.
            Why, for example, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan can secede from the USSR, but Slovenia or Croatia cannot?
            The situation is similar with Transnistria, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, they seceded from their republics, we supported them, but there were no complaints against us. We did not include these republics in the Russian Federation.
            In the case of Ukraine, it is completely different. The West would also turn a blind eye (well, they would have chided it, not the first one) if Crimea had seceded from Ukraine, and we would have started supporting it. Would have concluded agreements on friendship, cooperation and military assistance, they would have left their bases in the Crimea. Strelkov and Kalashnikov spoke about the danger of Crimea's inclusion in the Russian Federation (no one will deny that they are both patriots, not putriots). They warned that in this case we would face a collective west, which is what happened.
            If, for example, the FRG wants to take Pomerania from the Poles by military force, Germany will do it militarily. But there is no doubt that there is not a single country in Europe that will call Pomerania German. Also, the Germans will receive certain sanctions, they will most likely be less painful for them than the sanctions against us, but this is already a matter of economics.
            1. +3
              6 October 2020 13: 53
              We faced the collective west, and not in one war, for more than five hundred years, and the last, for us, the Second World War, in which the whole west fought with us, in one way or another, some with manpower, some with weapons and equipment , so it's just ridiculous to talk about some kind of collision, or simply sanctions, they were, are and will be, only again all this European army is dancing on its own rake, apparently they were not taught anything by the results of WWII, from which they were able to get out only with US aid and his Marshall Plan, driving itself into the eternal debt pit of Washington, storing in the US most of their gold reserves, which the Rockefellers and Dupont have already seized ...
              And Igor Strelkov, by his nature, is an adventurer, of whom there were a great many in our Russia, and who, because of this, brought many problems to our country ...
        2. +3
          5 October 2020 20: 42
          Well, first of all, I don’t understand why the army has a mortgage?
          Secondly, the West imposes sanctions not for something, but for something. They just find reasons or invent them. And why, including to hinder the development of our military technologies. Helsinki affairs and so on, all of this today, as well as the rest of the so-called "international law" has long been put, I apologize for the expression ...
          Thirdly, ground troops in the SAR are used to a minimum just for the sake of minimizing losses in manpower - they have learned from Afghanistan, Chechnya and other places.
          Fourthly - apparently, you really don't understand anything about the army at all, so I do not recommend expanding on this topic - you will not present yourself in a bad light.
          And fifthly, with regard to service - now I am a civilian, although I served in the Soviet Navy, then in the army of one of the post-Soviet republics, and then in NATO. so I have an idea, in general ... And with housing I'm all right hi
          But I am Russian, I have always been and will be.
          1. 0
            6 October 2020 11: 36
            .. Well, first of all, I don’t understand why the army has a mortgage? ..

            - If you lived in Russia, you would most likely understand why the shoigush army is a mortgage army. Now I will try to explain.
            During the Serdyukovshchina period, I worked part-time in the IT sphere in one sharashkin office. There were many officers whom Serdyukov brought out of the staff. The desk was very muddy, there was a lot of cash and people without official registration and without work books were welcomed (I worked under a contract). At that time, such sharashka for officers removed from the staff were like a well-known substance for flies, and gentlemen officers flocked to them. Serdyukov could not fire them without providing them with housing, although he cut their salaries. But at that time, the military could refuse apartments until blue in the face and endlessly be outside the state, which they regularly used, robbing their native state. Here's a section of the law that states what an officer behind the state cannot do:

            According to paragraphs. 7 tbsp. 10 of the Law on the status of military personnel, military personnel are not entitled to: engage in other paid activities, with the exception of pedagogical, scientific and other creative activities, if it does not interfere with the performance of military service duties.

            But gentlemen officers, they spat on the laws, as well as on everything related to money or apartments. These are the muh's offices and have become a haven for the not clean, gentlemen, officers. Seeing this orgy with an endless presence outside the state. The Ministry of Defense eventually adopted a law that if a serviceman refused an apartment 3 or 4 times (I don’t remember exactly), then he was given an apartment from the MO and kicked him in the ass. The Ministry of Defense then built housing worth many billions, where retirees refused to settle and continued to go out of the state and receive money in envelopes.
            The Ministry of Defense, seeing that it is impossible to deal with gentlemen with officers for good (to be honest), introduced a military mortgage, instead of real apartments in which no one wanted to settle. This turned out to be a very fruitful idea, the military was tied to the Ministry of Defense not only with his salary, but also with future housing. That is, if a soldier was expelled from the army, he also lost a military mortgage, because it, like a civil mortgage, first paid a percentage of the debt, and then the body of the debt and the military was left without an apartment. Accordingly, the military became even spineless and cowardly, for there was something to lose. If they are kicked out or resigned early, then the military mortgage is also lost.
            That is why the shoigush army serves for mortgages, a kind of slavery in modern times.
            Question to you, did you serve in the Bundeswehr?
            1. +3
              6 October 2020 11: 53
              No, not in the Bundeswehr, although I talked a lot with them and still talk to them.
              If with the above you mean the 90s and early 2000s, then there was nothing to eat for everyone, and especially for the army. "Native state" at that time, which threw absolutely everyone, and those who especially defended it, did not deserve much respect. The overwhelming majority of people who then wore officer's shoulder straps swore an oath to the country that the powers that be before their very eyes ruined, torn apart and sold for a pittance and with the army and the defense industry together, and they and their families with children were left to beg on the porch literally for alms. .. for a couple of years in Moscow it was not even recommended to appear on the streets in uniform outside the service - officers were attacked. so they got out as best they could, in the situation in which they were put.
              How and what Shoigu does, you can certainly look at it in different ways, just like he does different things. some, and from my point of view, to put it mildly, strange. Something does not work out or does not work out as intended. But this is always the case. Only those who do nothing do not make mistakes.
              But if you look at the overall result, in 15 years the Armed Forces have been raised practically from oblivion to the level of a modern world combat-ready army, indisputably one of the strongest in the world. You can think what you want, but this is a fact recognized by NATO itself. And the fact that the EuroNATOs will not be able to deal with Russia today without the help of the United States is their own analytics.
              1. +1
                6 October 2020 11: 57
                PS I looked about Serdyukov - it was a little later, but he already received this army. From what got, from that and sculpted. And I got what I wrote above.
              2. -1
                6 October 2020 12: 24
                The events I'm talking about took place in the period 2008 - 2010.
                About the 90s can also "enlighten".

                ..then then everyone had nothing to eat, and especially the army ..

                At that time, six of my classmates were serving as officers in the Ministry of Defense and the Border Troops. Soldiers love, remembering the famine in the army in the 90s, so that they break through a tear, they were malnourished, while in civilian life workers, engineers and miners put a thick layer of oil on black caviar. At least the state has gotten close to the military for delays in the salary, especially when retired. And how many civilians were thrown by all kinds of companies, LLCs and others. And the apartments, the valiant warriors, well, from whom the length of service allowed they were sued from their native MO, who is a one-room apartment, who is three rubles in Moscow, and an ordinary citizen even a one-room apartment in Moscow, this is at least 15 years of mortgage hard labor. So, let's not talk about salary delays and hunger in the army. The dry rations were tyrled and ate the soldiers.
                As an example, a classmate served in Chkalovsky (an aviation technician), did not work for a year, well, only 4 times a month, so that they would not be fired, but the salary received regularly and vacation and travel and other benefits (he quit in 2004, as a major). But he squeaked about the meager salaries in the army and the harsh conditions of army life. The length of service for the hut, though not enough. On the territory of the unit, since the beginning of the 90s, the unit commander organized commercial warehouses, which were used by local and Moscow businessmen because it was profitable, the bandits could not run into the warehouse, nevertheless, a military unit and guards with machine guns, tax officials too (but for a different reason, must give the warriors to earn). The unit commander was a decent man, the money for renting warehouses was distributed among the officers of the unit. It was the same with my classmate, a border guard, in South Karelia. A small business within the military unit, organized by the wives of the officers of this very unit, LLC for the supply and maintenance of this.
                Perhaps somewhere there were isolated cases, in the already very distant North, where the hungry mister officer fainted, but I can hardly believe this, knowing the sneakiness and greed of the mister officers.
                About the alms of the officers' children. Did you observe this yourself or from the words of the officers themselves?
                1. +1
                  6 October 2020 14: 09
                  I did not observe it, I lived in it. so educating me on this matter is hardly required. Between the officers, the gentlemen of that time, I can't call my tongue, of course there was all sorts of shit. The fact that they stole and did the devil knows what is true, but far from the majority. The majority, except to serve honestly, just knew nothing at all. Those who from the Nakhimov / Suvorovites, some only in civilian life, recognized or remembered that the tea is sweet because they put sugar in it, and not by itself - this is not a joke, this is reality. When a person carries out orders for his entire conscious life, and for this he receives full life support, then when it suddenly ends, he is simply lost - he does not know how to live .. I'm not saying that it was bad only for the military - for everyone. But especially for them, since it was really possible to earn money either in any way or by crime. Yes, some were going all bad.
                  These are officers. And the sailors, who were unlucky enough to serve urgently at this time, in training on the Russky Island, for example (where there is now beauty, a bridge and a university), ate dogs, which were hit by a car, raw (1991-92). A guy with a height of 1,98m weighed 60kg when he came to the combat unit from there ... And a BIG part of the army, 95%, lived like that. There are other options - the coolest castle in the very center of Karlovy Vary in the Czech Republic belongs to our former admiral, who, of course, has never participated in any naval battle in his life. But he had access to the decommissioning of weapons and equipment. And this was ... But this, I repeat, is very few ...
                  Under Serdyukov, I was not in the Russian Federation for a long time.
                  And your classmates, it seems, were no longer Soviet officers, but a generation of perestroika who grew up with broken brains without the concept of honor and conscience ... Not all, again, thank God. Otherwise, even now the army would be where it was then ...
      2. -3
        5 October 2020 20: 23
        He said everything correctly. Army ,, Russian Capitalist ,, (,, RK ,,) - ,, training ,, army. In the ,, training ,, state - ,, training ,, army. Everything is logical. Can it be otherwise? Drunkards, parasites, degenerates when Did they give you a good meal? "An apple from an apple tree .."
        What did this army teach Armenians, for example? Didn't Syria show a year or two ago that the army of ,, RK ,, ,, slept through ,, shock UAVs? So what? In Karabakh again - "one, but one at a time". Strike UAVs of Turkey again ,, surprise ,,. It seems that only graduates of correctional schools work in the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Why about n and ,, sleep on the move ,,?! Who and x will finally wake up ?! What do they get paid for? For what do they get the “crazy” titles? Well, it is clear why the girls receive the rank of general at a young age. And young, boys, who have not fought a day, how do they become generals? What can they teach subordinates? The void is empty.
        Look at Syria. Five (!) Years cannot give a fret. In batches, he liberated the USSR from Nazi enemies in European countries in 1944-45. And e and, ,, experts ,,? They cannot liberate ONE country from armed villains. The sky of little Syria cannot be closed from air raids ..
        What are you speaking about? What is the strength and power?
        Watch the Zvezda TV channel less ... However, there, too, on rossiyansky TV, experts can see the successes ... In the Caucasus 2020, 10 old and weak intelligence Eagles were assembled. and, lining up, launched. Depicting ,, mass character ,,. What for? What was it? One control machine controls only two devices. Why was this small pile organized? Again, show-off,,, window dressing, ,, game of life ,, ...
        You will literally see with your own eyes that Dubina was right. ,, Sad ,, will be all
    2. +4
      5 October 2020 14: 19
      The article is stupid ... but your arguments Dubin is even stupider !!! No wonder you have chosen the appropriate pseudonym wassat
      1. -6
        5 October 2020 18: 50
        It is clear that you will be from the warriors, touched about the mortgage army. Yes, alas, the apartment also follows stability. Fighting qualities are so-so.
        That you are attached to your nickname is short for "Cudgel of popular anger".
    3. 0
      11 October 2020 23: 22
      Congratulations! Your nickname is true
  3. +1
    5 October 2020 11: 52
    The USA is preparing a war against Russia: concrete evidence

    - well, these proofs began to appear in a very specific form even before the end of World War II, and since the time when mushrooms after rain only grow more and more. So there is no discovery here - this has been happening for 75 years in an unchanged form

    Specific goals are already being selected

    - there is some kind of inconsistency, why choose specific goals if

    we are no longer talking about a “point” or “limited” strike, but about the desire to wipe us off the face of the earth altogether.

    - here either the author or the Americans need to somehow decide. And as for erasing us from the face of the Earth, they, of course, can, but only in this case and with themselves for the company, and this even without our retaliatory strike - without the destruction of the entire planet, it will not be possible to simply physically erase a fifth of the land ...
  4. -3
    5 October 2020 12: 06
    Quote: Natan Bruk
    God, what kind of blizzard have I just read? However, this is typical for all the writings of Necropny. Only those who are very stubborn can take them seriously ...

    No, not Shamir!
    1. +4
      5 October 2020 21: 53
      No, not Shamir!

      Is Adi Shamir an expert in cryptology?
      Is Efraim Shamir a guitarist?
      Mayraf Shamir - footballer?)
      Yoaf Shamir - director?

      On Russian sites you see what kind of shamirs do you see?
  5. -1
    5 October 2020 12: 48
    And what, it is quite logical and intelligible, but this is not a matter of tonight. Washington first needs to agree with the Japanese, who already agree, then with China, which will also change on the fly, with the Turks, who dream of again getting the whole Caucasus and Crimea into their Ottoman Empire , and the Galicians have long been ready to tear our country to shreds, and when all this angry dog ​​pack rushes at us from all sides, we will not be able to withstand, even nuclear warheads will not help us, except that we will roll our grabbing neighbors under nuclear glass, if we will have time, well, and those who are overseas, for the most part, they will survive, because their air defense is not made for beautiful parades, and even if after the future nuclear apocalypse they still have at least 50% of their industrial potential, and two hundred million population, they will be happy with this outcome.
    1. +3
      5 October 2020 16: 25
      Shaw then carried you. Will Americans start a war to share? Cross yourself! Americans start wars just for the sake of plunder. Take a look at Ukraine. Occupied, the US ambassador is the almighty Gauleiter, the economy is seized. What did they share with the Lithuanian Poles? Only with a cookie.
      1. +1
        5 October 2020 19: 10
        Yes, they don’t have enough strength to seize the entire Russian Federation, and if they all, like jackals from different sides, attack Russia, and if they overcome, they will have to share with the whole flock, who is less, and who has nothing, and only the area RF is almost twice the size of the USA.
  6. 0
    5 October 2020 13: 09
    Well, so we are preparing. This is not Newton's binomial: back in 1994, Western "business circles" decided to resolve the Russian issue by military means. So the time has arrived ...
  7. -1
    5 October 2020 14: 03
    All threats must be answered in a mirror image. Take the DPRK or China. They are also provoked, but they answer immediately, and do not think for two weeks how to answer them. And when the policy of our Foreign Ministry is like this - and we will not be like! So they are greyhounds. What if we had military bases in Cuba, Venezuela, Vietnam, etc.? And in response to these teachings, would we respond with our own in these regions? Or was our fleet constantly not far from the coast of the United States or England like their fleet in the Black Sea? But our government is afraid to go into conflict, because the family and business are there. Can you imagine Trump or Biden buying their family a dacha in Sochi or Baikal? Therefore, exercises will be conducted near our borders, and there will be provocative air flights too. Shame and contempt for Putin !!
  8. -6
    5 October 2020 14: 59
    Ravings of a madman. the budget of the Russian Federation is 50% of taxes from the sale of netgas and the United States, if necessary, will not even have to fight. Agree with the CA and Russia as a state will cease to exist within a year.
    1. -4
      5 October 2020 18: 46
      Exactly. Petty Saudi Arabia almost brought the Greatest of the Nullins to its knees! I even had to bow down to Trump himself in order to influence the red-haired lecher on the Saudis! Thanks to Trump for influencing.
      The author, you'd better write how long we can hold out without exporting hydrocarbons if suddenly an embargo is announced to us.
  9. +5
    5 October 2020 16: 18
    optimists learn English, pessimists learn Chinese. realists are studying the Kalashnikov assault rifle.
    the author speaks of quite obvious actions. and spy planes fly near our borders, and exercises are carried out using our technology as targets, and the neighbors' propulsion is clearly not in our favor. Still from not quite obvious, but also obvious - too many unambiguously stupid, inadequate and short-sighted people are getting closer to the "nuclear button". sooner or later, someone's nerves will pass.
    I do not even doubt that we will brush it off, it is not the first time for us to unscrew the head of every Hitler-Napoleon. but at what cost again it will be ...
    1. -5
      5 October 2020 17: 36
      For the raw materials appendage of the West, called the Russian Federation, there is too much honor for this very West to attack it.
  10. 0
    5 October 2020 16: 22
    In one article I read about the power of Russian weapons. And they even write that this power exceeds the power of the USSR. People must be sure that the Army and the Navy will protect them from any aggression. The rest is for the military. This is how the cattle used to be. And we existed in the world for 46 years before the arrival of the new order. God grant so much more to live in the world.
  11. -5
    5 October 2020 17: 09
    Dear Necropy has surpassed himself, enchantingly.

    Moreover, such fundamental moments as the complete incompatibility of our two countries (ideological, ideological, civilizational nature) are completely swept aside.

    Maybe the respected Alexander, as a talented journalist, will be able to formulate what is the complete incompatibility of ideology (is there an ideology in the Russian Federation?), Worldview, and especially civilization (is there another civilization in the Russian Federation?). And then at first glance (and at the second one too) there is no difference at all.
    1. 0
      6 October 2020 00: 56
      Just about, I would very much like to know - what is the "Russian civilization"?
      1. +1
        6 October 2020 12: 00
        ... at least in the fact that a person named Nathan Brook communicates well in Russian wink And also probably read a couple of classical works on it in the original ...
        1. -1
          6 October 2020 17: 06
          Is the Russian language a sign of “Russian civilization?” So how many languages ​​there are in the world, there are so many civilizations? Powerfully pushed back. But the question arises - in Hebrew I speak almost as fluently as in Russian, and I speak English without difficulty (in Israel, a doctor, does not speak at least basic English - nonsense) Well, I also read fiction in these languages. Does this mean that I belong to three civilizations at once?
          1. -1
            6 October 2020 17: 33
            Does this mean that I belong to three civilizations at once?

            Yes! You are a real intelligent, intelligent, and educated Russian (or Soviet?) Jew and all 3 civilizations can be proud of you! And mom too! laughing
            1. 0
              6 October 2020 17: 40
              Oh, like that? By birth and descent? Well, thanks for the kind word, as they say ...
          2. +2
            6 October 2020 22: 02
            ... I wrote "at least" - this is one of the signs. There are languages ​​in which masses of people communicate, not being native speakers of this language. These are the languages ​​of international communication, as a rule, they are the languages ​​of civilizations. I hope you don’t deny the existence of British or Jewish civilization? But not necessarily a person, even one who knows a certain language perfectly, belongs to this civilization - he uses it as a fruit of this civilization, a tool created by it. One of the main distinguishing principles of civilizations is that they absorb alien elements that fall into their influence. And this is not in a bad sense of the word. As soon as alien elements cease to be absorbed by civilization and develop on its territory independently and originally, this leads to its destruction. We see this now in Europe, which until the end of the twentieth century absorbed everything that entered it, and is now weakening. There was also Roman civilization, ancient Egyptian ...
            There is a Chinese civilization, German, British, Russian, but, for example, let them not be offended at me, but not Ukrainian or Belarusian. This is Russian. The peoples who have lived on the territory of Russia for centuries, including the Jews, belong to the Russian civilization, as well as the Slavic tribes (such as the Lusatian Serbs) in Germany to the German one. Jews who come to Israel from the USSR are different from the locals, don't they? Like the Germans who moved to Germany from Kazakhstan and the Volga region ...
            Apparently, you are an educated person, so I will not expand further on what the Russian civilization has given to the world ...
            1. 0
              7 October 2020 01: 12
              All these "civilizations" are very conventional. As for Israel, it is generally a country of emigrants, and the differences there are on a different principle - newcomers differ from the rest, then the differences are erased, and the next generation is practically no different from the bulk.
              1. +1
                7 October 2020 13: 26
                I will not argue - I do not live in Israel, but from many acquaintances from there I know that there are strong differences. Of course, time teaches people to join the environment. But at the same time, there are differences that persist for life.
                For example, you are now communicating with me and not only on a Russian-language site that discusses specifically Russian or world problems, but from the point of view of Russian civilization. I also do not live in Russia, like many who are involved in communication here. Well, it would seem - you left, you live there - forget it. Take an interest in what is around you. But no - whatever one may say, but belonging to a certain primordial civilization, society, still affects. hi
                1. 0
                  7 October 2020 16: 49
                  To some extent, of course, you can't get away from the origin and many years lived on the "prehistoric". But in general I go not only to Russian-speaking sites, I visit English and Hebrew-speaking sites quite regularly. The first generation of repatriates, of course, is very different from old-timers - mentality, habits, etc. Then, yes, it smoothes out, and the next generations, born here, are generally indistinguishable from the old-timers.
                  1. 0
                    7 October 2020 21: 38
                    generations born here are generally indistinguishable from old-timers.

                    - correctly, grow up and form in another civilization Yes And they are unlikely to go to this site to communicate, although they may know the language.
            2. -1
              7 October 2020 02: 27
              Quote: Pyshenkov
              I hope you don’t deny the existence of British or Jewish civilization?

              Sorry to interfere, but I deny the existence of these civilizations.

              Quote: Pyshenkov
              One of the main distinguishing principles of civilizations is that they absorb alien elements that fall into their influence.

              Have you read Mowgli? I read about real stories when children were raised by wolves, but a wolf pack cannot be a civilization. If you decide to live among, say, the Chukchi, will your children, brought up among them, already be absorbed by the "civilization" of the Chukchi?

              Quote: Pyshenkov
              There was also Roman civilization, ancient Egyptian ...

              And what civilizations developed in the Roman territory?

              Quote: Pyshenkov
              There is Chinese civilization, Germanic, British, Russian,

              And what features make it possible to distinguish these civilizations? What is inherent in some but absent in others?
              In the historical sense, civilizations can still be distinguished, but today, in my opinion, it is impossible to single out individual ones. If we talk about civilization, then only in relation to all of humanity.
              1. +1
                7 October 2020 13: 38
                Mowgli, if I'm not mistaken, didn't become a wolf. Although the comparison is not strong at the box office, as with the Chukchi. This is an example of one character in a certain situation.
                The point is that civilizations absorb, absorb whole ethnic groups. This is the answer to what some have and others lack. Look at Russia: many peoples, at the same time original in their own way, but in the Russian civilizational space, using the Russian language for communication. The same is China, Britain. In the latter, however, there are fewer and fewer peoples under direct influence and they are already trying to isolate themselves - the Irish, the Scots, the Welsh. And this is a sign of the collapse of civilization.
                And on the Roman territory the Roman civilization developed. Over time, it disintegrated, in its place some new ones arose - German and British, for example. And Rome to all of them in a civilizational legacy left the Latin script and counting, as well as many elements of building a state. Civilizations have often spread their influence by force, by building empires, but not always ...
                1. -1
                  8 October 2020 00: 58
                  And tell me please, are there other signs of civilization besides language? It's just that language is rather a sign of a people, an ethnic group (Russian is a person who considers himself Russian and Russian is his native language). I find it hard to believe that Germany and France and Italy are different civilizations, just because they speak different languages.

                  Quote: Pyshenkov
                  The latter, however, has fewer and fewer peoples under direct influence and they are already trying to isolate themselves - the Irish, the Scots, the Welsh. And this is a sign of the collapse of civilization.

                  Well, if I use your language approach, I would be more worried about Russian civilization. The number of people for whom English is their native language is many times greater than Russian, and the number of those who speak these languages ​​differs by an order of magnitude. Over the past 30 years, the "area" of the Russian language has noticeably decreased, one refusal of Kazakhstan from the Cyrillic alphabet is worth something.
                  1. 0
                    8 October 2020 01: 56
                    Quote: Oleg Rambover
                    Well, if I use your language approach, I would be more worried about Russian civilization.

                    Oleg Rambover... For-dol-ball you are already literate. Start learning Russian civilization from its language.
                    1. -1
                      8 October 2020 08: 53
                      Well, you know where to go.
                      1. +1
                        8 October 2020 12: 19
                        Oleg Rambover, so I already came. I see that they did not expect. smile
                  2. +1
                    8 October 2020 09: 53
                    I never said anywhere that the main, let alone the only sign of civilization is a common language. This is one of the signs, and I mentioned it to Nathan just as an example of his own communication.
                    Germany and France with Italy are not different civilizations, the borders of the countries have nothing to do with it either. German civilization, meaning the Germanic peoples, and not Germany as a country, is practically all of Northern and Central Europe. Italy, Spain, Portugal and now South America in many respects, albeit with its own differences, is Latin. And, naturally, in modern globalization, the boundaries between these civilizations are blurring. As once, for example, in the Roman Empire, throughout its territory they tried in various ways, including by force, to introduce Roman rules and approaches. There was also a kind of globalization within its own capabilities. Not everyone liked this, the empire was destroyed as a result. Although traces of its civilization in the places of its existence still remain. The Germans, Swedes and other Germanic peoples also periodically tried to do the same, albeit for much shorter periods, and this did not end well for them either. Now there is the same implantation of someone's values, apparently Anglo-Saxon, to everyone else on the basis of universal rights. It will lead them, I think, to the same place as Rome ...
                    1. -1
                      8 October 2020 23: 20
                      Quote: Pyshenkov
                      I never said anywhere that the main, let alone the only sign of civilization is a common language.

                      But you did not name other signs.

                      Quote: Pyshenkov
                      German civilization, meaning the Germanic peoples, and not Germany as a country, is practically all of Northern and Central Europe.

                      If I am not mistaken, the British and the Americans also belong to the Germanic peoples, are they also from German civilization?

                      Actually, for this, the idea of ​​local civilizations among scientists is criticized, due to the lack of clear criteria. Even among the supporters of this concept, there is no unity in the definition of civilization and, accordingly, among these civilizations.

                      If in the last quarter of the XX century. many expected that the introduction of civilizational methodology would bring domestic theorists to the forefront of world science, but now such illusions should be abandoned. The civilization theory was popular in world science half a century ago, now it is in a state of crisis. Foreign scientists prefer to turn to the study of local communities, the problems of historical anthropology, the history of everyday life. The theory of civilizations has been most actively developed in recent decades (as an alternative to Eurocentrism) in developing and post-socialist countries. During this period, the number of distinguished civilizations increased sharply - right up to giving civilizational status to almost any ethnic group. In this regard, it is difficult to disagree with the point of view of I. Wallerstein, who characterized the civilizational approach as the “ideology of the weak”, as a form of protest of ethnic nationalism against the developed countries of the “core” of the modern world-system

                      - historian N.N.Kradin
                      1. 0
                        9 October 2020 00: 09
                        Quote: Oleg Rambover
                        If I am not mistaken, the British and the Americans also belong to the Germanic peoples, are they also from German civilization?

                        Oleg Rambover... You can't be smart. You Americans, for what reasons did you mention? smile
                      2. -1
                        9 October 2020 00: 30
                        Compared to you, work out.
                      3. 0
                        9 October 2020 00: 38
                        Quote: Oleg Rambover
                        Compared to you, work out.

                        When it works out, then maybe I'll praise you. In the meantime, sorry ... smile
                      4. +1
                        9 October 2020 10: 32
                        Just read about the special literature on this matter! Yes It's not for me to educate you here for free about civilizations ... And this is not really my profile, so to speak. I do not pretend to universality of knowledge. By the way, different historians also have different opinions on this matter. Again, in different historical periods, the situation developed in different ways - several peoples with different roots live in the British Isles. The Scots seem to be Normans, and the British and Irish are Anglo-Saxons, but this is also a subject of scientific controversy to this day. And in America, in general, kish-mish from emigrants. Although the dominant civilizational influence is still Anglo-Saxon, how long is the question. So many people don't like it more and more ... Is the collapse of another empire close? wink
                        The conversation with Nathan began in general regarding the Russian civilization, so I will return to this. IT IS, and it differs from Germanic, Latin, Anglo-Saxon, Chinese, etc. They also call it differently, some Slavic, some Byzantine, but I am Russian, so I consider it Russian, and how I see it different from others.
                      5. -1
                        9 October 2020 15: 48
                        Quote: Pyshenkov
                        And in America, in general, kish-mish from emigrants.

                        All peoples are kish-mish.

                        Quote: Pyshenkov
                        so I consider it Russian, and how it differs from others I see.

                        Would you mind listing them? Briefly, basic. Just please, don't talk about the educational program, they usually say this when there is nothing to say, when he himself does not know. You are not like that.
                        And by the way about the Byzantine civilization. Do the Greeks also refer to it?
                      6. +1
                        9 October 2020 16: 41
                        As for the Byzantine civilization, as I said, I do not think this is correct, since Byzantium has long been gone. If we look at it this way, then almost all of Europe is Roman civilization, and Rome, too, has long been gone, in the sense of an empire. but if you choose from such ancient layouts, then today's Greeks, apparently, belong to the Byzantine. And the ancient Greeks had their own, like the Egyptians. But both disappeared.
                        Differences of Russian civilization: language, Orthodox faith and tolerance of other religions, a more humanitarian and emotional way of thinking, in contrast to the technocratic Western, idealism, a tendency towards a more patriarchal way of life, the reaction to surrounding events is slow but strong, attachment to the place of residence, hence the importance of the concept of homeland ... If you think about it, there would probably be something else. But as I said, this is not really my specialty ...
                      7. -1
                        10 October 2020 02: 39
                        The Russian Empire is no longer there either, though not so long ago.
                        So I don’t understand, the Greeks and I belong to the same civilization?

                        Quote: Pyshenkov
                        Orthodox faith and tolerance of the Gentiles

                        Faith has very little impact on Russian society. Significantly less than in Ukraine, Georgia or the United States. Secularization is a global trend, but the communists have significantly accelerated this process in 70 years. I doubt very much about tolerance, ask on this forum how people feel about the construction of mosques.

                        Quote: Pyshenkov
                        a more humanitarian and emotional way of thinking

                        I don't know what the humanitarian is, but the emotional way of thinking is inherent in the majority of the world's population, are there statistics on countries or is this your belief?

                        Quote: Pyshenkov
                        idealism

                        It is difficult to understand how one can measure the degree of idealism of a representative of the German or Russian civilization.

                        Quote: Pyshenkov
                        a tendency towards a more patriarchal way of life,

                        For Russians, a rather controversial statement. The patriarchal way of life of the Russians began to destroy Peter I, and the Bolsheviks and urbanization finished off. What is the patriarchal way of life for modern Russians?

                        Quote: Pyshenkov
                        reaction to surrounding events is slow but strong,

                        Who measured it, how is it measured?

                        Quote: Pyshenkov
                        attachment to the place of residence, hence the importance of the concept of the Motherland ...

                        Do you think some American is different?

                        Agree that most of your criteria are not measurable, this is only your vision, which you can hardly justify anything.
                        Therefore, the concept of local civilizations is criticized. There are no criteria, no concept (at least in a scientific sense).
                      8. +2
                        10 October 2020 11: 34
                        Listen, I told you that this topic is not my field of interest, and I just express my own opinion on this issue. I'm not going to argue with you, although all your arguments can also be refuted without difficulty anyone. I don't see the point, especially since everyone at the end will remain unconvinced. Time is a pity.
                      9. -1
                        10 October 2020 13: 36
                        OK, sorry, it's an interesting topic.
  12. 0
    6 October 2020 08: 55
    Quote: steel maker
    All threats must be answered in a mirror image. Take the DPRK or China. They are also provoked, but they answer immediately, and do not think for two weeks how to answer them. And when the policy of our Foreign Ministry is like this - and we will not be like! So they are greyhounds. What if we had military bases in Cuba, Venezuela, Vietnam, etc.? And in response to these teachings, would we respond with our own in these regions? Or was our fleet constantly not far from the coast of the United States or England like their fleet in the Black Sea? But our government is afraid to go into conflict, because the family and business are there. Can you imagine Trump or Biden buying their family a dacha in Sochi or Baikal? Therefore, exercises will be conducted near our borders, and there will be provocative air flights too. Shame and contempt for Putin !!

    Let's omit the cost of maintaining these databases. Let's skip the question of whether Cuba and Vietnam will agree to this. How can these bases be maintained purely technically? It will be very costly by air, but nothing by sea. The Russian Pacific Fleet will not be able to compete with the fleets of Japan and South Korea. I'm not talking about the US TF. How to protect communications across the Atlantic? Are you sure that the Russian Navy has enough forces to stay permanently off the coast of Britain, on a rotational basis? In terms of the number and quality of frigates, destroyers and aircraft carriers, the British Navy is stronger than the Federation Council of the Russian Federation. So wishlist about bases at the nose of the United States, this is an empty zilch
    1. 0
      7 October 2020 10: 27
      This is not 1961. No need for expensive bases. The supply point and crew change of nuclear submarines are enough, which will pass any "blockades" rather freely.
  13. 0
    6 October 2020 10: 31
    Quote: Dear couch expert.
    No, not Shamir!

    Is Adi Shamir an expert in cryptology?
    Is Efraim Shamir a guitarist?
    Mayraf Shamir - footballer?)
    Yoaf Shamir - director?

    On Russian sites you see what kind of shamirs do you see?

    They were not looking there. Everything is simpler, Shamir - in Hebrew UKROP, not Shamir ... look at the name of the author of the note. For the Israelis, Shamir is primarily Yitzhak Shamir, a politician and former prime minister.
  14. +4
    6 October 2020 13: 00
    The United States is afraid to fight even in North Korea, and they are struggling in the Russian Federation because Putin has played into tolerance, one B-52 shot down near the Crimea is enough for the Yankees to sit on their priests exactly. One shout from Kim, who threatened to erase all US military bases in South Korea, Japan, Hawaii, Alaska and California into radioactive dust, quickly cooled Washington's warlike ardor.
    1. 0
      7 October 2020 10: 25
      Yes, this is a method of "crawling into conflict" in which the one with the most resources wins.
  15. 0
    7 October 2020 03: 24
    And what is the point of the United States to fight with the Russian Federation? Almost ALL the warriors of the last centuries are warriors for the redistribution of markets for goods and services. At the top of the pyramid, there is only one country with its leading world currency, the United States. What will the war and the victory of the United States over the Russian Federation? Resources? So the Russian Federation sells them for candy wrappers, and then buys imported consumer goods for the same candy wrappers and even invests the surplus of these candy wrappers in the state securities of the enemy - the United States. It's not as simple and linear as the author of the article would like to see.
    1. +1
      7 October 2020 10: 23
      And what was the point of the European reich to fight the USSR?
  16. +1
    7 October 2020 10: 22
    There is only one conclusion: to reduce losses it is necessary to choose the moment and strike first, destroying the age-old stereotype of the laziness and good nature of the "Russian bear", which does not want to do anything until "the thunder breaks out."
  17. 0
    10 October 2020 15: 28
    To argue that the US is preparing an attack on Russia is the height of incompetence or lack of brains. Americans are not at all adventurous and will never attack even an equal in strength.
    1. -1
      10 October 2020 15: 39
      Anything can be expected from those who drop atomic bombs on cities with civilians.
  18. -1
    11 October 2020 22: 43
    TopVar has the same specialist. Romka Skomorokhov. Who openly calls Russia cattle, an army a gang. And he wants the start of the war, so that the West conquered Russia. Who does not believe, read his writings