A brutal blow to a field camp: Baku's targeted attacks could change the course of the Karabakh war

October 3 2020 75

The Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan has published new videos of air strikes by its drones on congestions of manpower, technology and the positions of the Armenian army in Nagorno-Karabakh.

It should be noted that the Azerbaijani military is actively using various unmanned vehicles. One of the know-how was a large-scale application Soviet aircraft An-2 for opening the positions of the Armenian air defense system. Then, the Armenian air defense missile systems are attacked by Israeli kamikaze UAVs IAI Harop, which are actually homing projectile aircraft with a flight range of up to 1 km.

When the area is cleared of Armenian air defense systems, the Azerbaijanis begin to methodically destroy enemy units from the air. In addition to the aforementioned disposable IAI Harop, other means of destruction are used. For example, the Turkish drones Bayraktar TB2, with a carrying capacity of up to 55 kg. They are equipped with Turkish MAM-L and MAM-C air-to-surface missiles weighing 22,5 kg.

The videos presented show how strikes are delivered to the field camp, various armored vehicles and vehicles, as well as to the combat positions of the Armenian military. By the way, it is difficult to call an attack on a field camp otherwise than cruel. These are not advancing subunits, not a column of troops marching along the front line.

The massive use of UAVs and targeted air attacks can change the course of the war for this region in favor of Baku, because, as the experience of Syria and Libya has shown, it is quite difficult to defend against such attacks. Moreover, Azerbaijan has been seriously introducing drones into its armed forces for a long time. It is well known in Yerevan and Stepanakert, but at the same time the Armenians did not have the means to counter the UAV. Now they are literally being shot as if in a shooting gallery.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

bobba94

+9

3 October 2020 11: 05

Pashinyan squeezed out officers who had once studied in Soviet military schools or served in the Soviet or Russian army and had a decent military education. There were no Western military advisers in the Armenian army due to the constant Armenian Maidan. More than 1000 people at the US Embassy in Yerevan were not engaged in building a new Armenian army, but in a completely different matter. The result is logical.
1. Hayer31
  
  -3
  
  3 October 2020 11: 13
  
  What nonsense are you talking about ??? What are Western advisors ??
  Fired only three korruptsiioerov, threehhh.
Termit1309

0

3 October 2020 11: 17

The massive use of UAVs and targeted air attacks can change the course of the war for this region in favor of Baku, because, as the experience of Syria and Libya has shown, it is quite difficult to defend against such attacks.

Pretty easy. Modern air defense would be available. As this experience has shown, there is no air defense, drones rule, as any, even the most primitive attack aircraft would do. If there is air defense, the capabilities of drones tend to zero. Armenia has strained air defense systems.
There is really one thing. Israeli disposable drones will simply run out, Turkish ones will simply be knocked out, and the ammunition for them is small and expensive. So, literally in a week Azerbaijan will have to fight without them.
1. Atilla10933
  
  -3
  
  3 October 2020 12: 28
  
  Quote: Termit1309
  So, literally in a week Azerbaijan will have to fight without them.
  
  Do you think it will be difficult for Azerbaijan to fight in a week?) Do you think there will be someone or something left? More precisely, it will remain, only the protection will no longer be the same.
  
  Quote: Termit1309
  The Turkish will simply knock out, and the ammunition for them is small and expensive.
  
  Do you think we have no money to buy ammunition?))))
  1. Oyo Sarkazmi
    
    +1
    
    3 October 2020 16: 23
    
    Quote: Atilla10933
    Do you think it will be difficult for Azerbaijan to fight in a week?)
    
    Azerbaijan from all sides, with the exception of Georgia, is surrounded by countries that do not want the conflict to develop. So the expensive pleasures will really end soon. And if the presence of foreign mercenaries from the Middle East is confirmed, the border with Russia may be closed for security reasons. And then economic losses will generally spoil all the pleasures of seeing the Armenians gutted, as in Sumgait.
2. Atilla10933
  
  0
  
  3 October 2020 12: 48
  Quote: Termit1309
  Armenia has strained air defense systems.
  
  They are strained in everything.
  And here the prisoners went.
3. Baylar Rzayev
  
  0
  
  3 October 2020 17: 08
  
  Azerbaijan will buy more and they will be able to get the fig bayraktar. Secondly, AZERBAIJAN bought from Israel the killer drones С300 and С400 are being tested in Karabakh.
  1. Martin
    
    0
    
    4 October 2020 19: 41
    
    Azerbaijan will buy more bairaktars
    
    Fooling. You won't be able to wage a long war anyway.
    
    Israeli drones assassins S300 and S400
    
    What a big name. Do you believe in fairy tales?
4. mikhail.rybakov2017
  
  +2
  
  3 October 2020 17: 32
  
  In a week, the entire Armenian army will be destroyed and the Azerbaijani flag will fly over Karabakh.
Valentine

+5

3 October 2020 12: 36

Well, well, they fled to their national khatyn women, some as a prince, some as a padishah, some as a murza, without first legalizing their inter-land relations, who slaughtered whom and how much, so now the massacre and interethnic hatred began. I remember the singer and artist Polad Bulbul Ogly, after all, he was a normal man, and when he was appointed as the ambassador of Azerbaijan to Russia, he wove so much with the Armenians that you can't describe with a pen, and you can't tap on the keyboard, he will be immediately banned. People simply become fierce beasts in their formations, and all consider themselves the only and chosen by God, and the rest are just rubbish. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Ukrainians - and everyone hates each other fiercely, but Russia is like a mother to them, and will give work, and citizenship too, and they live here with figs in their pockets and arrange their own " sleeping "ISIS cells, blow up train stations, houses, rob and kill Russians. Close our border for all of them, let them boil in their republics, fight among themselves, and do not pass their problems onto us, otherwise we are occupiers and invaders for them, but as soon as they bother, Russia help.
1. Atilla10933
  
  -4
  
  3 October 2020 13: 21
  
  Quote: Valentine
  I remember the singer and artist Polad Bulbul Oglu, after all, he was a normal man, and when he was appointed as the ambassador of Azerbaijan to Russia, he wove this on Armenians
  
  What did you dislike about his words?
Bakht

+6

3 October 2020 12: 37

By the way, it is difficult to call the attack on the field camp otherwise than cruel. These are not advancing subunits, not a column of troops marching along the front line.

I am simply amazed at the richness of the language. Is it cruel to attack enemy headquarters in war?
1. Kristallovich
  
  -3
  
  3 October 2020 13: 18
  
  During the war, attack
  
  War and fighting are still slightly different things. In 1994, a truce was signed, and no one tore it up. But they do it regularly.
  1. Bakht
    
    +4
    
    3 October 2020 13: 22
    
    That is, it is impossible to attack the enemy headquarters during military clashes?
    And by the way, in Karabakh there is a war with the use of the most modern means of destruction. And not the dismantling of two gangs.
    1. Kristallovich
      
      0
      
      3 October 2020 13: 48
      
      I believe that if you attack objects in the depths of the front line, then this is already a war and it is necessary to declare it.
      
      And by the way, there is a war going on in Karabakh ...
      
      War with a signed truce? What is it like?
      1. Bakht
        
        +3
        
        3 October 2020 13: 57
        
        Whom to announce?
        
        https://haqqin.az/news/190815
        
        Azerbaijan does not attack the territory of Armenia. Unlike Armenia, from the territory of which Azerbaijani settlements are being shelled.
        -----
        And one more discrepancy. If there is a front line, it is most likely a war. And the destruction of enemy manpower and command, as well as reserves in the depths of the defense is not cruelty, but a harsh reality.
        ------
        The author needs to learn Russian
        
        Kristallovich
        
        0
        
        3 October 2020 15: 17
        
        Azerbaijan does not attack the territory of Armenia. Unlike Armenia, from the territory of which Azerbaijani settlements are being shelled.
        
        Yerevan states the opposite ...
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 15: 39
        
        It is possible that it claims.
        But ask the question - where does the unrecognized republic (that is, officially no one sells them anything) have hundreds of tanks and art installations? Heavy missiles and air defense systems? Hundreds of tons of ammunition? These are all Russian weapons that enter Karabakh through Armenia. In fact, this is a state of war between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Armenia grossly violates the terms of arms supplies from the Russian Federation. All such treaties contain a mandatory clause on the non-transfer of weapons to a third party. I don't know why the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry does not focus the attention of the Russian side on this.
        -
        Disruption of communications between Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh is the most important task of the Azerbaijani army. As well as the destruction of enemy warehouses and control points. So there is no need to talk about any cruelty in this particular case. Yesterday's strikes on the bridge and command post are a military necessity. And there is nothing to complain about.
        
        Kristallovich
        
        0
        
        3 October 2020 16: 55
        
        Where did the unrecognized republic (that is, officially no one sells them anything) got hundreds of tanks and art installations?
        
        Armenia has never hidden that it supports the RNC, arguing that a large number of Armenians live in the territory. As well as Russia supports Donbass with weapons.
        
        Bakht
        
        +4
        
        3 October 2020 17: 04
        
        The first statement is correct. The second is controversial. Donbass found weapons in mines
        
        Kristallovich
        
        -3
        
        3 October 2020 17: 50
        
        Where? In the mines? What nonsense)) Putin personally admitted that the equipment is from Russia. And even without his confession, it was as clear as day. I'm not even talking about the photos of T-72B3 and T-90 from Donbass, which were never seen in Ukraine.
        
        Where do they get it? Apparently, from those structures of states that sympathize with them. But this is their technique, not foreign.
        
        Bakht
        
        +4
        
        3 October 2020 18: 44
        
        If it does not make it difficult, a link where Putin personally recognized. I haven't heard that.
        Which government agencies have the T-90? Only OboronExport is engaged in the export of combat technology ...
        Yes, and I have not seen the T-90 in the photo
        
        Kristallovich
        
        -2
        
        3 October 2020 18: 50
        
        The fact that you did not hear or did not see does not mean that this was not in principle.
        
        From 02:57 minutes.
        
        And here is the T-90 in the Donbass.
        
        Bakht
        
        +2
        
        3 October 2020 18: 57
        
        The photo is good. So they came from somewhere.
        I can't watch the video. But Putin said that weapons are supplied by the Defense Ministry through OboronExport or from private owners?
        
        Kristallovich
        
        +2
        
        3 October 2020 18: 59
        
        From "sympathetic states"
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 19: 08
        
        I am interested in OFFICIAL deliveries. There were official deliveries to Armenia. Russia did not supply anything to Karabakh.
        
        Kristallovich
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 19: 24
        
        Have you decided to switch to officialdom? Well, then let's ask ourselves, where is Baku's official recognition of the fact of the presence of militants from Libya on the territory of the republic? And they are there. I cannot explain the flights from Libya to Azerbaijan in any other way ... These countries have no regular air service.
        
        Bakht
        
        +4
        
        3 October 2020 19: 35
        
        There are no militants from Libya. The presence of flights is not proof. To include uncontrollable gangs in the army, this must be thought of. You have to be crazy to transfer frequencies and control to them.
        ----
        Concerning Donbass. Firstly, the weapons in the Donbass were at first their own, then they were blown by the north wind. But I would never compare Karabakh and Donbass. Completely different situations.
        It’s clear that Armenian troops are fighting in Karabakh. And they use weapons from Armenia. This is absolutely nothing new. Just who will make up for the loss? Surely Russia and again on credit.
        
        Kristallovich
        
        -1
        
        3 October 2020 19: 43
        
        The presence of flights is not proof.
        
        What else can they mean?
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 20: 05
        
        Well, for example, I ordered a persimmon.
        
        Fights have been going on for a week. Heights and settlements are fought back and captured with difficulty. A war is going on with the use of the most modern means. And they still prove to me that Azerbaijanis do not know how to fight and that semi-savage Arab militants are fighting for them.
        It’s offensive in the end.
        
        https://ru.oxu.az/war/427476
        
        Kristallovich
        
        0
        
        3 October 2020 20: 21
        
        Well, for example, I ordered a persimmon.
        
        You have moved away from the constructive.
        
        Bakht
        
        +2
        
        3 October 2020 20: 24
        
        And here there is no construct. Only rumors and gossip
        Do not be lazy, read.
        
        https://ru.oxu.az/politics/427057
        
        Kristallovich
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 20: 25
        
        There are objective means of controlling air traffic. For no apparent reason, planes flew from Libya to Baku.
        
        Bakht
        
        +2
        
        3 October 2020 20: 27
        
        So what? Have you looked at them? Can you confirm your words "And they are there"?
        
        Kristallovich
        
        0
        
        3 October 2020 20: 51
        
        Can you confirm the presence of the Russian weapons sold to Yerevan by the NKR forces? Contracts, invoices?
        
        Bakht
        
        +2
        
        3 October 2020 21: 08
        
        I can even post screenshots of documents of Armenian citizens who died in the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. These are not mythical mercenaries, but quite career officers of the Armenian Armed Forces.
        
        Kristallovich
        
        0
        
        3 October 2020 21: 10
        
        You ignored my question. I cannot confirm the transfer of mercenaries to Baku, there are only indirect signs. Can you confirm the transfer of weapons by Yerevan to Stepanakert?
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 21: 19
        
        There are many photos of captured and destroyed vehicles. I didn't look specifically who it belonged to. Armenia or Nagorno-Karabakh. In any case, there was definitely no Point-U in Karabach. As well as the S-300. Although the destruction of the S-300 Armenia denies
        But your question is meaningless. Armenia does not deny the fact of aid to Nagorno-Karabakh with weapons and people
        
        Kristallovich
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 21: 24
        
        Likewise, Russia does not deny the transfer of weapons to Donbass.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        3 October 2020 22: 05
        
        Again? Yes, Russia is giving weapons to Donbass. Only the lazy did not write about the "North Wind". But you will not find official confirmation.
        And what is written by bloggers, I do not read
        
        Kristallovich
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 22: 07
        
        Putin's words are quite an official statement. You have to be mentally retarded not to understand who is meant by "sympathetic states."
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        3 October 2020 22: 14
        
        I cannot open the video. Putin said that Russia is arming the Donbass?
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +2
        
        4 October 2020 01: 59
        
        And they still prove to me that Azerbaijanis do not know how to fight and that semi-savage Arab militants are fighting for them.
        
        Why then do you accept help from Turkey?
        And the Western press confirms the participation of "pro-Turkish" militants in Karabakh. So that...
        Let's wait and see who and what can.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        4 October 2020 09: 12
        
        The Western press claims that Boeing was shot down by Russia, the Skripals and Navalny were personally poisoned by Putin. And there were chemical weapons in Iraq. List more what the Western press admits?
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +2
        
        4 October 2020 10: 31
        
        The Western press claims that Boeing was shot down by Russia, the Skripals and Navalny were personally poisoned by Putin. And there were chemical weapons in Iraq
        
        This is not an argument. In the case of your country, as well as Turkey (a NATO member), there is no such bias as against Russia.
        Therefore, this information can be regarded as completely objective.
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        4 October 2020 11: 12
        
        This is not an argument. The commitment towards Azerbaijan is also quite strong.
        You can't be a little pregnant. Either you consider the Western media as an objective source of information, or not. Personally, I don't trust them. Journalism is the second ancient specialty
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +2
        
        4 October 2020 12: 08
        
        Either you consider the Western media as an objective source of information, or not. Personally, I don't trust them.
        
        I am able to analyze information and separate fakes from truth. This applies to both Russian and foreign information.
        
        There are fairly reliable indicators of the objectivity of information.
        
        In "our" case, this indicator is the statement of the German press:
        
        https://www.google.de/amp/s/www.heise.de/amp/tp/features/Erdogans-neuer-Krieg-4919101.html
        
        Already in the first lines of the article, the bias of the German side in favor of the Armenians is excluded:
        
        ... Turkey continues to intervene in the conflict in the South Caucasus through military intervention. Germany blocks European sanctions against Ankara ... (Die Türkei facht den Konflikt im Südkaukasus weiter an und interveniert militärisch. Deutschland blockiert europäische Sanktionen gegen Ankara)
        
        That is, I have no doubt about the bias of this information.
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        4 October 2020 12: 19
        
        I just have a strong doubt about the veracity of this information. This is a biased opinion.
        I read it and referred it to false information.
        Does the article say that the shelling of Azerbaijani settlements is coming from Armenia? And today there was information that the city of Ganja was subjected to rocket fire from the territory of Armenia. Incidentally, the second largest city in Azerbaijan.
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +2
        
        4 October 2020 12: 37
        
        Does the article say that the shelling of Azerbaijani settlements is coming from the direction of Armenia?
        
        This article is not a frontline report.
        Are we talking now about Turkish intervention in the Karabakh conflict and their use of Islamist militants? This is what you deny, and this is what the article confirms.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        4 October 2020 12: 49
        
        This is what I deny and this is precisely what there is no supporting evidence. Rumors and guesses are not facts. But the article contains a lot of unreliable information. Therefore, I consider her to be engaged.
        It's a matter of perception. Returning to the beginning. Many Western journalists and politicians sincerely believe that Moscow is to blame for many crimes. And they will not believe your thesis about engagement. Therefore, for me, the reference to the media is unconvincing.
        I know the specific facts and genesis of the conflict. And I know ABSOLUTELY for sure that the war did not start because of the intrigues of Turkey, Israel or aliens. The cause of the war is the aggressive policy of Armenia.
        -----
        The participation of Islamists on the side of Azerbaijan completely contradicts the domestic policy of Azerbaijan. You just don't know how the Islamists feel in Azerbaijan. They are tried and imprisoned. And for a long time.
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +2
        
        4 October 2020 16: 21
        
        But the article contains a lot of unreliable information.
        
        I do not think so. This is just that rare case when both Russian and Western information largely coincide.
        But you are the “party to the conflict”, therefore, you are the one who is engaged for me. I have more reason to believe the third (neutral) party than yours or Armenian information (or rather disinformation).
        
        And there is no need to present yourself as such a grain of truth here. It doesn't suit you. I have always considered you to be an objective participant in the discussions on this site. Stay with it in the future.
        
        As for the rest, I wish you (Azerbaijanis) and Armenians to find other forms of clarifying your territorial relations, and not to be pawns in other people's games.
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        4 October 2020 16: 36
        
        I just think that my position is the most objective. I see inconsistencies in the German edition. And incomplete presentation of the material. Without this, there is no objectivity.
        Do you insist on Islamist militants? There is no place for them in Azerbaijan. In the 90s, there were both Chechens and Afghans. This did not lead to anything good. At the same time, there were Arabs (Armenians from Lebanon and Syria) on the Armenian side. The ARABO battalion was defeated. Nobody will give the ciphers and army communications codes to the mercenaries. And control systems. And jihad-mobiles were not noticed in this war. This is a high tech war. Barefoot with Kalash is not the place here.
        Currently I can assume there are Turkish or Israeli drone gunner instructors. And no one will find such facts. But nothing more. You don't need special flights for this.
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +2
        
        4 October 2020 16: 56
        
        I see inconsistencies in the German edition. And incomplete presentation of the material. Without this, there is no objectivity.
        
        There is a lot of material. This article was given just as an example. There are others. The Turks themselves do not deny their active participation in Karabakh. Regarding the "Islamist militants", you have some false ideas about "barefoot with Kalash".) These are very combat-ready army units, with many years of experience in fighting. I don’t know how it is with "jihad mobiles"), but there are probably experienced UAV operators there.
        "The codes and codes of the army communications" (as well as the communications itself) will be provided by the Turks themselves, and they will not even ask you about it.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        4 October 2020 17: 00
        
        I constantly see an underestimation of the Azerbaijani army here. For some reason you all think that only Turks and Islamists are fighting. It is useless to argue with this. This is already a cliché. Armenians will now be weaned from this cliché. Then it will be seen.
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +3
        
        4 October 2020 17: 40
        
        I constantly see underestimation of the Azerbaijani army here.
        
        Did I even say a word about the failure of the Azerbaijani army?
        The point here is about something else - about Turkish ambitious actions, which they themselves declare.
        For some reason, you deny the "intrigues of Turkey" in the current aggravation in Karabakh.
        And I just see it the other way around. It is the Turks who provoke the Azerbaijanis to forcefully return Nagorno-Karabakh. Let's leave the goals of the Turks aside for a while. Since you say that your army can deal with the Armenians without outside help, why have you been waiting all these 30 years?
        Why did you decide right now, feeling the strong shoulder of the "allies" nearby?
        I deliberately wrote the word allies in quotation marks, because the Turks are not really those for you.
        Erdogan pursues exclusively his own interests. Whether it's "revenge on Putin" or something else ... it doesn't matter.
        It is important, what exactly for you, that Erdogan will get what he started all this for, and will make you arrividerches, and you - Azerbaijanis, then you will have to rake all this shit left to you by the Turks. As well as the Armenians, however.
        The situation can be aggravated by the intervention in the conflict of other parties, for example Russia. With unpredictable consequences for everyone (both you and us).
        Therefore, I wished you not to be pawns in other people's games.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        4 October 2020 18: 17
        
        It is the Turks who provoke the Azerbaijanis to forcefully return Nagorno-Karabakh.
        
        This is a basic error that is present in almost all comments. Everything else follows from this error. After Pashinyan's words "Karabakh is Armenia and that's it," the war became inevitable.
        Russia will not intervene. Is it really a week, is it still incomprehensible? Russia will intervene only if there is a direct threat to Armenia. And there is no such threat. Even today, after a missile strike on Ganja, Azerbaijan is not going to attack Armenia itself. It is the task of Armenia - by any means possible to provoke a strike on Armenia and to drag Russia into the war.
        By the way, it is Turkey that warns Azerbaijan not to succumb to provocations and not to shell the territory of Armenia.
        
        https://haqqin.az/news/190882
        
        Dear sofa expert.
        
        +3
        
        4 October 2020 18: 28
        
        Russia does not fit.
        
        Russia can intervene not on the side of the Armenians, and not against the Azerbaijanis, but pursuing purely personal geopolitical interests: to prevent the strengthening of Turkish influence in the region. And you will simply fall under the hand for participating in the ambitions of the Turks.
        
        Evgeny Lugan
        
        0
        
        4 October 2020 10: 06
        
        I think I see on the right, or maybe on the left, a road sign: welcome to Donbass)))
2. Baylar Rzayev
  
  -1
  
  3 October 2020 17: 11
  
  They were the first to kill our General in Tovuz back in July, so now the hunt for the generals has begun. You look and Pashinyan will be found if, of course, this dog comes to Karabakh .. before he often came there and wore a military uniform
  1. Dust
    
    -1
    
    3 October 2020 23: 56
    
    They will thank you for Pashinyan in Russia!) We don't like this Sorosenko!)
Ser sash

-1

3 October 2020 14: 33

And what about Russia with UAVs and the means to combat them?
The technological lag is already evident and it will grow, because without engineers and scientists there will be no "breakthroughs". There is only hope for nuclear weapons, and even then the enemy does not learn to neutralize it.
1. Heroes Heroes
  
  +1
  
  3 October 2020 19: 11
  
  What you knew your parents and relatives. Now everyone knows about it!
Termit1309

0

3 October 2020 15: 45

Quote: Ser Sash
And what about Russia with UAVs and the means to combat them?
The technological lag is already evident and it will grow, because without engineers and scientists there will be no "breakthroughs". There is only hope for nuclear weapons, and even then the enemy does not learn to neutralize it.

I'll sleep in a good mood. I haven't laughed like that for a long time
Termit1309

+1

3 October 2020 15: 49

Quote: Termit1309
Armenia has strained air defense systems.

They are strained in everything.
If the enemy is inferior to you in numbers and weapons by almost an order of magnitude, then why you still cannot win?
bzbo

-1

3 October 2020 16: 27

Why not say it was a hospital?
Beelzebub

-1

3 October 2020 18: 16

It is not Azerbaijanis who fought with the Armenians, but the Jews are using their weapons against Christians !!! Here they write for money !!! Yes, the Jews will give them for free - then they will TRIPLY demand, they are usurers in their brains and souls !!! And for the Armenians without Russia - KHANA! !! You look at these shots and you understand - !!! Both people and technology ...
Heroes Heroes

0

3 October 2020 19: 02

Where is the noisy and rich Armenian diaspora? All these Kardashians, Mkhitaryans and Aznavurs (just kidding)? Why doesn't the loot flow like a river? 4 years in prison since the last conflict, smoked bamboo! Now get the most out of it!
Dust

+1

3 October 2020 23: 52

I watched the videos, to be honest, it's impressive! I think there is a great future for drones of wide use! Most likely the era of drones is coming! As in the time there was an era of guns, then tanks ... now drones! ..... Wangyu, in the future, drones will receive invisible coverings, artificial intelligence, powerful weapons! And most importantly, they will be able to attack in flocks of thousands of units supported by artificial intelligence ...
1. unholyknight
  
  +2
  
  4 October 2020 02: 11
  
  It won't come. Already, the Shells are receiving compact anti-unmanned missiles, plus a microwave weapon is being developed that will simply fry electronics. In their current dimensions, it will be difficult to protect a UAV, an increase in size will lead to an increase in the cost of this type of equipment and deprive it of the advantages that it has now. About the flocks, it's generally funny - all this swarm intelligence becomes dull in a banal way, it is worthwhile to normally put interference. It is difficult to cram an anti-jamming connection into small dimensions. And if you make large dimensions, the main essence of the swarm is lost, that is, the relative cheapness.
  1. Ser sash
    
    +1
    
    4 October 2020 16: 40
    
    AI communication is not needed. And in order to shoot down an unmanned aerial vehicle, you first need to detect it, and this is the main problem.
    1. Dear sofa expert.
      
      +2
      
      4 October 2020 17: 22
      
      And in order to shoot down a drone, you first need to detect it, and this is the main problem.
      
      This is a problem for you, because it is not in the subject. Here, read, it may seem convincing to you:
      
      https://rostec.ru/news/lovushka-dlya-drona-kak-vyvesti-iz-stroya-bespilotnik/
2. Kuramori Reika
  
  0
  
  5 October 2020 05: 20
  
  Oh well, nonsense. It's just that anti-aircraft machine guns will be returned to tanks, but in automatic mode.
valeriy ufimtzev

0

4 October 2020 01: 54

We must admit the frankly main reason for the conflict that has arisen is overt nationalism on both sides. And in the current economic and political situation, all previously unresolved territorial problems of Azerbaijan and Armenia were and are being solved only by military confrontation. There is no other option for today and cannot be!
1. Dear sofa expert.
  
  +2
  
  4 October 2020 17: 59
  
  There is no other option for today and cannot be!
  
  Why not? One can recognize the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh, for example. It worked out with Kosovo.
kriten

0

4 October 2020 14: 30

Pashinyan did not prepare for war, Soros promised to protect if he expelled the Russian language from the media and schools, those who treat Russia well from the authorities and the army. Where is Soros ---- A UUUUU ... When will the Armenians realize that they have chosen a leader with the intellect of a ram ...?
Kuramori Reika

+1

5 October 2020 05: 16

The Armenian army is an example of how to waste time. They knew that Baku was buying massively drones, they knew that drones were attacking Russia practically without interruption in Syria, they knew that all the evil spirits from the Caucasus had rushed to Syria, but they did nothing. Armenia did nothing but play revolution, throw mud at the Russian embassy, pour shit on Russia, create ethnic crime in Russia and live as if everyone owes it to it. Armenia is not our ally, they have the largest US embassy in the world, so let them help. I hope they get out of the ODKB and join NATO