Tests of the new Krylo-SV rocket will begin in a year

24

The recoverable stage of the Russian promising partially reusable launch vehicle Krylo-SV may make its first flight as early as next year. The agency reported about it yesterday TASS, referring to the statement of the general director of the FPI Andrey Grigoriev.


The functionary said that all the work on the creation of the launch vehicle is proceeding normally. At the moment, a new appearance of the product is being developed. The first test flight in subsonic mode is scheduled for the end of 2021.

Recall that the basis for the promising launch vehicle "Wing-SV" was the "Baikal" project, developed by the State Research and Production Space Center named after MV Khrunicheva in the early 2000s. However, the creation of modern reusable media will be dealt with by another design bureau, which is now being created from scratch.

As for the new project, it was prepared and defended last spring. Design bureau was responsible for the development. V.M. Myasishcheva.


It is assumed that the partially reusable rocket will be able to launch up to 600 kg of payload into a low reference orbit. In this case, the six-meter recoverable first stage with a diameter of 0,8 meters will undock at an altitude of about 60 km and return to Earth.

A feature of the domestic development is that the first stage of the carrier will be able to land at the airfield in airplane mode. For this, the design includes: a rotary wing, jet engines and a parachute braking system.
We are
Soyuz-7 rocket: first, real, reusable
The revival of Baikal: what is wrong with the Russian reusable missile?
Reporterin Yandex News
Read Reporterin Google News
Ad
The publication is looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Cyril Online Cyril
    Cyril (Kirill) 1 October 2020 13: 29
    0
    Hurry up already
  2. Kuramori Reika Offline Kuramori Reika
    Kuramori Reika (Kuramori Reika) 1 October 2020 13: 50
    +1
    Even if a specific development does not take off, ours will definitely soon create a reusable stage, several times cheaper and several times faster. And then the Americans add another hundred lard to something, we'll see if we decide whether to improve the idea and again make it 2-3 times cheaper and faster)
    1. Cyril Online Cyril
      Cyril (Kirill) 1 October 2020 14: 00
      -5
      ours will definitely soon create a reusable stage, several times cheaper and several times faster.

      We haven't created something yet. Although the American Falcon-9 (on which, by the way, not billions were "lost") has been successfully flying for 4 years (in a reusable mode).
      1. 123 Online 123
        123 (123) 1 October 2020 17: 09
        +1
        We haven't created something yet. Although the American Falcon-9 (on which, by the way, not billions were "lost") has been successfully flying for 4 years (in a reusable mode).

        How do you know? The company is not public, there is no exact information. Moreover, the cost of technologies transferred to the Mask for free is not taken into account.
        1. Cyril Online Cyril
          Cyril (Kirill) 1 October 2020 19: 32
          -2
          The company is not public, there is no exact information.

          How does the company's non-publicity affect the fact that it uses reusable rockets?

          If you are talking about the price, then:

          Irene Klotz:
          - Air Force authorizes SpaceX to launch two future GPS III satellites on previously flown Falcon 9 boosters, saving $ 26 million for each flight.

          Irene Klotz is an Aviation Week editor based in Cape Canaveral. Before joining Aviation Week in 2017, Irene spent 25 years as a news agency reporter covering human and robot space travel, commercial space, astronomy, science and technology for Reuters and United Press International.

          Moreover, the cost of technologies transferred to the Mask for free is not taken into account.

          What technologies? Who transmitted? List please.
          1. 123 Online 123
            123 (123) 1 October 2020 20: 40
            +4
            How does the company's non-publicity affect the fact that it uses reusable rockets?

            Not how. Stop lying about the low cost of rocket development. negative Be hivi hi
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                2. Cyril Online Cyril
                  Cyril (Kirill) 1 October 2020 20: 58
                  0
                  Where is the development cost?

                  Yes Easy :)

                  https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/586023main_8-3-11_NAFCOM.pdf
                  1. 123 Online 123
                    123 (123) 1 October 2020 21: 10
                    +1
                    Yes Easy :)

                    Results: “The activity estimated Falcon 9 would cost $ 3.977 B

                    Is that what? 4 billion bourgeois candy wrappers? winked
                    But what about:

                    Although the American Falcon-9 (which, by the way, did not "swell" billions)

                    Stop lying.
                    1. Cyril Online Cyril
                      Cyril (Kirill) 1 October 2020 21: 18
                      0
                      Is that what? 4 billion bourgeois candy wrappers? winked

                      This price also includes payment for the first batch of launches, daraga :)

                      Read carefully, everything is in the plate there.
                      1. 123 Online 123
                        123 (123) 1 October 2020 21: 29
                        +1
                        This price also includes payment for the first batch of launches, daraga :)

                        Oh yeah! Initially, we counted 1 "unit" Subsequently, we talked with the "personnel" of the company and included in the price 2 "summer units" laughing Subtract the cost of two missiles from 4 lard and sit admiring the sign.
                        ps California kite dear to you repeat
                      2. Cyril Online Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 1 October 2020 22: 18
                        +1
                        Subtract the cost of two missiles from 4 lard and sit admiring the sign.

                        4 billion is NASA's initial program estimate. Even before they - yes - visited SpaceX to evaluate the production process. There it is written in English:

                        “The activity estimated Falcon 9 would cost $ 3.977B based on NASA
                        environment / culture. NAFCOM predicted $ 1.695B when all technical inputs were adjusted to a more commercial development approach.

                        If you carefully looked at the tabular data, you would see that the total development cost of 2 stages (not 2 first stages, but first and second) Falcon-9 was 443 million. The total cost of the program was approximately 1,7 billion. There, especially for people like you, we made a comparison of 2 estimates.
                      3. 123 Online 123
                        123 (123) 1 October 2020 22: 35
                        +2
                        The total cost of the program was approximately 1,7 billion. There, especially for people like you, made a comparison of 2 estimates.

                        1,695 billion is when the costs are adjusted. So they were corrected? Where is the real development cost? Such surveyors need a shovel on the hump ..... Some 4 count, the second 1,7, such a scanty spread of 2,3 billion. winked Can you trust them?
                      4. Cyril Online Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 1 October 2020 23: 03
                        0
                        1,695 billion is when the costs are adjusted.

                        You don't know how to read at all, can you?) I explain again:

                        4 billion is a preliminary estimate from NASA, based on the production culture of NASA and its former contractors.

                        1.7 billion is NAFCOM's updated estimate (after evaluating the level and culture of production at SpaceX.

                        1,7 billion is the program estimate AFTER SpaceX's audit:

                        Working with different inputs from the preliminary data provided by SpaceX after a trip to the SpaceX facility, NASA recently inputted revised data into the NAFCOM model and a different output was the result.

                        Some 4 consider, the second 1,7, such a scanty spread of 2,3 billion.

                        Why not? The traditional scheme of NASA's work includes many bureaucratic procedures, unnecessary certifications, multiple payments to contractors, and so on. All this requires money, and a lot. Due to them, you can save money.
                      5. 123 Online 123
                        123 (123) 1 October 2020 23: 25
                        +1
                        You can save, you cannot save ...
                        The estimate is the estimated cost. Nobody really knows how much they spent. Or are you an exception? So share your source of wisdom with the public winked
                      6. Cyril Online Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 1 October 2020 23: 53
                        -1


                        Nobody really knows how much they spent. Or are you an exception? So share your source of wisdom with the public

                        at 12:30, Gwyneth Shotwell (President of SpaceX) indicates how much was spent on developing Falcon and Dragon under the ISS supply program.
                      7. 123 Online 123
                        123 (123) 2 October 2020 00: 05
                        +1
                        Dzhetelmen taken to take their word for it? sad This is the lot of the cultists negative The head of a company with closed reporting can say anything, because no one can check her words. More recently, Tesla claimed that they had a super-duper autopilot, until a German court announced that it was not. winked
                      8. Cyril Online Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 2 October 2020 00: 14
                        -1
                        Dzhetelmen taken to take their word for it?

                        Officials at an official press conference can be trusted because their statements are regarded as, in fact, official.

                        The head of a company with closed reporting can say anything, because no one can check her words.

                        Yes, it would be open, you would say - "yes, they forged the reporting!"))

                        More recently, Tesla stated that they had a super-duper autopilot, until a German court announced that it was not

                        Gentlemen (court) can be taken at their word? :) You see, this argument works both ways.
                      9. 123 Online 123
                        123 (123) 2 October 2020 00: 22
                        +1
                        Officials can be trusted.

                        Truth? Why do you have doubts about the statements of our "officials"? Or are you used to believe only Anglo-Saxon winked

                        Yes, it would be open, you would say - "yes, they forged the reporting!"))

                        If my grandmother ..., in general, it would be a grandfather. In the meantime, merchants declare unverifiable data. Why on earth should I believe them? I am not a member of a sect.

                        Gentlemen (court) can be taken at their word? :) You see, this argument works both ways.

                        How does it work? Businessmen are interested in selling, they can promise anything. The court is not interested in anything, the company could not defend its point of view in the process. Are you suggesting not to believe the German court and blindly trust Musk? I sympathize, apparently the brain damage is not reversible. negative
                      10. Cyril Online Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 2 October 2020 00: 33
                        -1
                        Why do you have doubts about the statements of our "officials"?

                        In what statements? In which they talk about what WILL be done? Yes, doubts. Gwynne also talked about what is ALREADY done.

                        Why on earth should I believe them?

                        Yes, no one forces :)

                        I am not a member of a sect.

                        Yes, really?) I even know what it's called :)

                        The court is not interested in anything

                        Yes, really?) The court is a state body of Germany, Germany has its own car manufacturers, which - oh, gods! - are also developing their own self-driving electric vehicles. So much for your interest.

                        German officials (and not only ones) say that Navalny was poisoned, most likely for political reasons by the Russian special services or structures close to them. Believe it?)

                        the company could not defend its point of view in the process.

                        Maybe it just wasn't worth the candle? We decided to change the description and save on litigation. It still didn't have a big impact on sales.

                        and blindly trust Mask

                        Why trust him blindly? I used an example of a NASA document with an old and updated estimate. There is evidence of how much NASA paid for the development of Falcon and Dragon under contracts. There is an official statement from Shotwell.

                        Sorry, apparently the brain damage is not reversible

                        It's funny that you sympathize with yourself :) I'll join.
                      11. 123 Online 123
                        123 (123) 2 October 2020 00: 38
                        +1
                        All the data you provide does not mean anything. The estimate is just a plan, it does not always coincide with reality. "Intentions" to spend a certain amount does not mean that it has been met. A businessman's statement is not worth a dime. Mavrodi at one time was also about the same "official". But I still believe in the court more. They were not guessing on the coffee grounds, experts worked there, and not dependent.
                        In general, if there is data, please contact. If not, good night. I'm tired of talking about Anglo-Saxon rogues.
                      12. Cyril Online Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 2 October 2020 00: 43
                        -1
                        They were not guessing on the coffee grounds, experts worked there, and not dependent.

                        How do you know who worked there and how the court's opinion was reached?)

                        All the data you provide does not mean anything.

                        Of course :) They run counter to your point of view about "Anglo-Saxon rogues" :)

                        The only problem is that the "Anglo-Saxon rogues" have developed a reusable rocket, have been using it successfully for a long time, and have taken over the world market of commercial launches, on which Roskosmos used to be a monopoly. The "rogues" launched their own satellite constellation, developed a super-heavy rocket, are developing an even more super-heavy rocket, etc., etc.

                        At that time, Roskosmos has been talking for 25 years with a rocket that is already outdated.
                      13. 123 Online 123
                        123 (123) 2 October 2020 00: 48
                        +1
                        Young man, you got sick with your propaganda. Are you suggesting to believe your idol? This is sectarianism. I do not participate in this and do not advise you. In court, I already gave you a link, read the materials, get educated.
                        In general, if you have nothing to say, grind your teeth in splendid isolation.
                        Good night.
                      14. Cyril Online Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 2 October 2020 01: 00
                        -1
                        Are you suggesting to believe your idol?

                        I suggest we just face reality.

                        This is sectarianism. I do not participate in this and do not advise you.

                        You are a member of the "all-denying" sect. Whatever argument you give, all the same - "you can't trust them, they cheat everywhere." Like the "lunar conspiracy debunkers" straight.

                        In court, I already gave you a link, read the materials, educate yourself.

                        There was nothing said about any experts. And if it is said, then the same "argument" can be applied to this - "yes, this is all set up, the court was bought by German carmakers", etc.

                        In general, if there is nothing to say

                        Yes to you.
                      15. The comment was deleted.
                      16. The comment was deleted.
                      17. The comment was deleted.
                      18. The comment was deleted.
                      19. The comment was deleted.
                      20. The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  • Eduard Aplombov Offline Eduard Aplombov
    Eduard Aplombov (Eduard Aplombov) 1 October 2020 16: 25
    0
    Until there is a reformatting, calibrating power at all levels, attracting and educating a new generation of managers in our rapidly changing world and in Russia in particular, no breakthrough ideas and industries will work. The same vanguard was headed by the Mohican from the USSR, almost all the ideas of new weapons are based on the ideas of the USSR, sucking billions from the treasury. The current managerial generation of former Komsomol apparatchiks has grown up on buy and sell. The GDP built a temporary power vertical which, in the current model of the world, staggers and bends like grass, but it is tenacious but not mighty. And the resilience of our country, Russia, exists so far on ordinary people born under the USSR, breaking spears with a grown Sorosovsk liberda in the internet, it is difficult to predict what will happen to Russia in a dozen years if the current system and its inhabitants are in power