The US made it clear to Russia that it does not intend to leave Syria

32

The Pentagon continues to strengthen its combat positions in the northeastern part of the SAR, transferring military supplies and infantry fighting vehicles from the northern regions of Iraq. The east of Syria is controlled by the military alliance "Syrian Democratic Forces", a significant part of which are members of the Kurdish paramilitary organization "People's Self-Defense Forces". This region is under heavy technique and covered military trucks. The Turkish state news agency Anadolu reported this on Friday 25 September.

The day before, 79 trucks passed through the Alwaleed command post on the Syrian-Iraqi border. As part of the convoy, fuel trucks arrived in Syria, as well as 12 trucks. The cargo to support the bases will be distributed among the US military facilities in Hasak, Deir ez-Zor and Raqqa. Over the past couple of weeks, five military convoys of about three hundred trucks have arrived in Syria from Iraq.



Currently, US troops in Syria are deployed at 11 military bases and strong points. Since October last year, after the start of the Turkish army's operation "Peace Spring" east of the Euphrates, the Americans have regrouped their forces, and their goal was to establish control over the oil fields of eastern Syria.

Russia also began to strengthen its military presence after October 2019. According to a number of sources, Moscow may soon increase pressure on Washington eastward from the Kamyshly airport, in the zone of oil fields in the Rumeilan region.

Earlier, Donald Trump spoke about the need to withdraw all US troops from Syrian territory, but after that he changed his point of view many times. The head of the United States Foreign Office, Mark Esper, announced on October 21 that the Pentagon could leave a small American military contingent in the east of the SAR to protect local oil fields from IS terrorists (an organization banned in the Russian Federation). Apparently, with the current transfer of military supplies, the Americans are making it clear to Russia that they do not intend to finally leave Syria.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    32 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      25 September 2020 18: 16
      Strengthening US forces in Syria is more of a problem for Turkey in relations with the Kurds, who are supported by the US. Strategically, the United States is acting to weaken Turkey by arming the Kurds, which leads to their statehood. Who needs such a US strategy in the Middle East - Israel is the main one, and the Saudis are in the hands of ... The result of such a US policy over the past decade is that most of the Arab states, Israel's opponents, have been defeated and in ruins ...
      1. +1
        25 September 2020 18: 58
        the United States has a habit of creating new allies and destroying old ones. in the early 40s the United States trades with Germany in the late 40s create Israel. Saddam was an ally of the United States, after a while they hanged him. Israel can also expect surprises ... judging by the actions of Israel doing everything to make anti-Semitism grow, the Jews are going to move again.
        1. 123
          0
          25 September 2020 20: 36
          Israel can also expect surprises..Judging by the actions of Israel doing everything to make anti-Semitism grow, Jews are going to move again.

          That is unlikely. The level of relations there is completely different. I don't remember the Iraqi lobby in the USA.
          1. 0
            25 September 2020 20: 42
            Iraqis are not Jews. they did not genocide their people to achieve their goal ... Hitler only did exactly what King David did. Jews from all over Europe were herded to Israel, Palestinians are like animals on a reservation, Germans pay money ... Is the medicine in Israel good? especially plastic and cosmetology .... so they did not touch Dr. Mendel.
            1. 123
              0
              25 September 2020 20: 49
              Iraqis are not Jews. they did not genocide their people to achieve their goal ...

              I believe the people of Halabja do not share your opinion.

              Hitler only did exactly what King David did. Jews from all over Europe were driven to Israel, the Palestinians are like animals on the reservation, the Germans pay money ... is the medicine in Israel good? especially plastic and cosmetology .... so they did not touch Dr. Mendel.

              The discussion about Hitler, Davila and Mendel is not interesting to me. Be patient, I suppose the guys from the Middle East will catch up soon, you will talk to them Yes
              1. +1
                25 September 2020 20: 57
                I'm more interested in the opinion of the inhabitants of Lukoml and Vologda, whom the Little Russians killed. guys from the Middle East will find an explanation for their actions similar to how Ukrainians justify the Volyn massacre and the Haidamak uprising. so I will sleep peacefully and not wait until here ... appear.
      2. -1
        25 September 2020 22: 38
        The Kurds are a strategic threat to the existence of Turkey in its current form, this problem should be solved by political means. military methods cannot solve it, and they themselves will not resolve in any way. Unfortunately, Erdogan lacks common sense to correctly assess the situation.

        Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
        defeated and in ruins most of the Arab states, the enemies of Israel ...

        Egypt and Jordan, two states that were once enemies of Israel and have repeatedly fought, today have full-fledged diplomatic relations with it, other Arab countries, one after another, normalize relations with the Jewish state, so everything here is with a plus sign. And the collapse of the Baathist regimes in Iraq and Syria was predictable and the Americans had nothing to do with it.
        1. 123
          +2
          26 September 2020 02: 27
          Kurds are a strategic threat to the existence of Turkey in its current form

          All neighbors are a strategic threat to their existence. Starting from Byzantium.

          And the collapse of the Baathist regimes in Iraq and Syria was predictable and the Americans had nothing to do with it.

          Did you pass by by chance? winked
          First, Iraq fought with itself, and then Saddam himself hanged himself from the exorbitant torment in the cell? laughing
          1. -1
            26 September 2020 05: 50
            Quote: 123
            All neighbors are a strategic threat to their existence.

            The Kurds are not neighbors for the Turks, but an enslaved, but not submissive people, because most of the Kurds live in Turkey. And the formation of Kurdish independent quasi-states in Iraqi Kurdistan and in the northeastern regions of Syria, which will inevitably lead to an increase in protest moods among Turkish Kurds for Erdogan as a sickle for Faberge. It is clear that if the American military presence had not been in the Syrian territory, populated mainly by Kurds, the Turks would have simply seized these lands and staged a form of genocide for the Kurds, as the Armenians once did.

            Quote: 123
            At first, Iraq fought with itself.

            You are right - at first in Iraq and Syria, the power was seized by the supporters of the Baath party, which in fact is nothing more than the application of the ideology of National Socialism on Arab soil, then these rulers for several decades pursued a policy of cruel and bloody pacification of the population of their countries and unleashed aggressive wars with neighbors in which they were defeated. As a result, the Iraqi dictator was hanged, his country was mired in devastation and civil strife, and his Syrian counterpart is still alive, thanks to the support of the interventionists, while the country that was called Syria does not actually exist.
            1. 123
              +2
              26 September 2020 12: 59
              You are right - at first in Iraq and Syria, the power was seized by the supporters of the Baath party, which in fact there is nothing but application of the ideology of National Socialism on Arab soil,

              Justification will be or is it rhetorical blah, blah, blah. Surely they say the same about you.

              then these rulers for several decades pursued a policy of cruel and bloody pacification of the population of their countries and unleashed aggressive wars with their neighbors, in which they were defeated.

              Sounds just awful belay How could this happen in a democratic and tolerant Middle East? what After all, there is peace and prosperity all around, in Egypt everything is solved exclusively by peaceful means, the Turks have no problems with the Kurds, and your new friends are Saudis,
              are chamomile fields sown in Yemen? By the way, the territory of the Palestinians is suspiciously decreasing smile I am plagued by vague doubts whether peace-loving neighbors like Israel and Jordan had a hand in this?

              As a result, the Iraqi dictator was hanged, his country was mired in devastation and civil strife, and his Syrian counterpart is still alive, thanks to the support of the interventionists, while the country that was called Syria does not actually exist.

              In my opinion, you still missed some "insignificant" details in the narration feel





              And yes, Syria exists and will continue to exist, whether you like it or not.
              1. -2
                26 September 2020 19: 11
                Take an interest in the ideology of Baath, somehow it did not fit me to promote it.

                Quote: 123
                Syria exists and will continue to exist, whether you like it or not.

                It is no longer in its former quality and never will be.
                1. 123
                  0
                  26 September 2020 20: 51
                  Take an interest in the ideology of Baath, somehow it did not fit me to promote it.

                  What for? What new things will I learn about her? Has something fundamentally changed?

                  It is no longer in its former quality and never will be.

                  It depends on what you mean by "old view".

                  Surely you haven't noticed the "privatization" of the Palestinian territories and Anglo-Saxon "aviators"? Good approach good we skip uncomfortable topics ... winked
                  1. -1
                    26 September 2020 21: 06
                    What does the "Palestinian territories" have to do with this topic?
                    1. 123
                      +1
                      26 September 2020 21: 21
                      What does the "Palestinian territories" have to do with this topic?

                      Well, how is it? Themselves talked about bad rulers unleashing wars of conquest.

                      then these rulers for several decades pursued a policy of cruel and bloody pacification of the population of their countries and unleashed aggressive wars with their neighbors, in which they were defeated.

                      Aggressive wars imply the "privatization" of territories. So I decided to inquire about Palestinian "real estate". In my opinion, it is quite useful to see how things are with the neighbors. And it turns out if they themselves grabbed a "Middle Eastern hectare" or friendly Jordanians, then this is quite good for itself, but if the insidious Syrians, then not very much. By the way, how are the Americans doing on Syrian territory?
                      1. -3
                        26 September 2020 21: 26
                        The Israelis have not privatized a single Palestinian hectare because there is no Palestinian state or Palestinian people. And the Americans do not seem to be going to annex a single meter of the former territory. Syria to the United States.
                        1. 123
                          +1
                          26 September 2020 21: 45
                          The Israelis have not privatized a single Palestinian hectare because there is no Palestinian state or Palestinian people.

                          Here it is ....



                          And you have a claim to Iran that it does not recognize you? belay

                          And the Americans do not seem to be going to annex a single meter of the former territory. Syria to the United States.

                          And what are they doing there?
                        2. -1
                          27 September 2020 12: 17
                          Quote: 123
                          And you have a claim to Iran that it does not recognize you?

                          What are the claims? We'll spray if that's the end of it.

                          Quote: 123
                          And what are they doing there?

                          They forgot to report to you personally ... lol
                        3. 123
                          +1
                          27 September 2020 13: 59
                          What are the claims? We'll spray if that's the end of it.

                          An interesting approach. what They have about the same to you. feel Good luck with building bilateral relations with Iran laughing

                          They forgot to report to you personally ...

                          I think it's not about forgetfulness. These zazhravshihsya boors simply cut themselves to the extreme.
                          You can, of course, behave like that, but there is a problem and it's not even a matter of morality. Sooner or later, but in the end, the eternal question arises before the boor - what are we for? The most interesting thing is also about Israel. But there are differences, if the Americans go home as from Vietnam, and I would like to remind you of an old anecdote. hi

                          https://moto-ru.livejournal.com/10523114.html
                        4. -1
                          27 September 2020 15: 44
                          Quote: 123
                          Interesting approach. They have about the same to you.

                          You are wrong - the difference is obvious: the Israelis intend to smash the Persians only if they try to destroy Israel, and the Persians intend to destroy Israel just for their own pleasure.

                          Quote: 123
                          Americans if they go home like from Vietnam,

                          And we do not intend to go anywhere, therefore we are forced to defeat our enemies. Such is our hard Jewish lot ... angry
                        5. 123
                          0
                          27 September 2020 15: 58
                          You are wrong - the difference is obvious: the Israelis intend to smash the Persians only if they try to destroy Israel, and the Persians intend to destroy Israel just for their own pleasure.

                          For your own pleasure? belay Why only you? Destroying other neighbors is not such a pleasure for them?
                          And your closest ally of the United States, for what reasons does he want to smash Iran? For 70 years, Iranians have not been breathing evenly.

                          And we do not intend to go anywhere, therefore we are forced to defeat our enemies. Such is our hard Jewish lot ...

                          That's what I’m talking about Yes Refresh the anecdote in your memory. Your wings are unlikely to grow back, perhaps you should think about how to live on the ground if the crow flies away.
                        6. -1
                          27 September 2020 16: 57
                          Quote: 123
                          Why only you?

                          Ayatollahs believe that there should not be a Jewish state.

                          Quote: 123
                          And your closest ally of the United States, for what reasons does he want to smash Iran? For 70 years, Iranians have not been breathing evenly.

                          You are clearly mistaken - before the overthrow of the Shah in 1979. The United States was one of the countries most friendly to Iran, as was Israel, by the way.
                        7. 123
                          +1
                          27 September 2020 17: 32
                          Ayatollahs believe that there should not be a Jewish state.

                          Well this is more like the truth Yes And then "maniacs", the pleasure of destruction ...
                          By the way, what did you say about Palestine? winked

                          You are clearly mistaken - before the overthrow of the Shah in 1979. The United States was one of the countries most friendly to Iran, as was Israel, by the way.

                          Aha Yes Since the coup organized by the Anglo-Saxons in 1953. Apparently from the Iranian side, "friendship" looked somewhat different. By 1979, I didn’t want to be friends. "Friends" were seen off with "honors".
                        8. -1
                          27 September 2020 17: 37
                          Quote: 123
                          Well this is more like the truth

                          This is the truth.

                          Quote: 123
                          Apparently from the Iranian side, "friendship" looked somewhat different.

                          She looked normal - Iran in those years was the most developed country in the Islamic world.
                        9. 123
                          +1
                          27 September 2020 17: 52
                          She looked normal - Iran in those years was the most developed country in the Islamic world.

                          From your point of view, it may be normal. It may very well be that it is the most developed, I will not delve into it, this is not the point. Maybe they don't like it when they forcefully change their power and begin to develop? If tomorrow they want to develop you so, how will you react to this? In fact, the United States created the conditions for the fundamentalists to come to power with their own hands. In those years, they were driven with wet rags not only from Iran. There must have been reasons for this.
                        10. -1
                          27 September 2020 21: 01
                          Quote: 123
                          From your point of view, it may be normal.

                          From the point of view of any sane person.
    2. +2
      25 September 2020 20: 52
      Whose hands would they bury there?
    3. +1
      26 September 2020 07: 20
      Arabs and Muslims have a strong and influential religion ... if the door were open for it, it would launch like a rocket ... the major powers want to remain in a state of extreme weakness and disruption ... and deep sleep ... they are not want this launch
      1. 0
        26 September 2020 10: 30
        Khaled ... Each religion was created in certain territories and peoples living there, but in other territories it is no longer applicable. For example, the Shariat dogmas will not be accepted by the peoples of northern Europe with a different culture of life and morality, and so on ... We have Buddhism spreading in East Asia with their worldview and morality, and so on ..., Islam. suitable for its environment of origin, there it meets the current needs of social cohabitation of societies, as Christianity once responded to the European needs of communities in the Middle Ages ... Therefore, to assert universality for everyone in the world of today's Islam does not correspond to realities ...
      2. 0
        26 September 2020 19: 33
        Arabs and Muslims have a strong and influential religion ...

        -What religion ??? - Is Islam a religion ??? - Where are the philosophical works; theological treatises; religious polemical fabrications; scientific theological works ... - where is the interpretation and explanation of the very essence of Islam given ??? -There is only a "charter and code", hastily compiled ... whole chapters taken from the Great Christian Gospel ... and a somewhat paraphrased evangelical history of the Christian religion itself ...
        -About the human soul ...- there is absolutely nothing ... -But there is a rather accessible and "understandable credo": "Cut the heads of the unfaithful, praise the Almighty; destroy everything that does not correspond to what is not related to Islam ... -and you will have a whole harem of "beautiful peri" in the next world and everything will be in chocolate ... -For savages just right ...
        1. 0
          26 September 2020 23: 29
          "Cut the heads of the unfaithful, praise the Almighty at the same time; destroy everything that does not correspond to what is not associated with Islam ... - and you will have a whole harem of" beautiful peri "in the next world

          - Have you ever wondered what Islam offers in the next world to women-suicide bombers in terms of erotic pleasures? laughing lol
    4. 0
      26 September 2020 23: 25
      According to a number of sources, Moscow may soon increase pressure on Washington eastward from the Kamyshly airport, in the zone of oil fields in the Rumeilan region.

      - What will the pressure be? Will he drive the Wagnerites again, like in Deir ez-Zor? wink
    5. 0
      26 September 2020 23: 33
      Quote: 123



      And yes, Syria exists and will continue to exist, whether you like it or not.

      - And why push a two-year-old video here today?