Western media have announced the risk of a full-scale civil war in the United States


The US presidential election in November this year may be the most toxic in American history. Domestic political life in the United States is becoming increasingly polarized - the country is very likely to start a real civil war. Writes about this British edition of the Daily Mail.


Many large US cities (New York, Louisville, Portland, Rochester, etc.) now resemble scenes from the movie "Gangs of New York" - the streets are divided between criminal-ethnic groups, and their confrontation risks turning into a real armed conflict every minute ...

So, in one part of New York, a group of 250 African Americans, dressed in paramilitary uniforms and clicking the bolts of weapons, march. Elsewhere in town, white militias, the "patriots" of Trump, are doing the same.

The confrontation in Louisville (Kentucky) is also growing - here the "black" coalition NFAC is opposed by people wearing body armor and masks with a skull. Fighters from the back the Blue squad sympathetic to the authorities clashed with armed groups Black Lives Matter (BLM) - protesters used their fists and shouted their political slogans, amplifying them with megaphones.


No other scene can convey the ugliness of this presidential campaign so vividly. Most of all, one should fear that such a confrontation could result in a full-scale civil war - this will happen if the demands of one of the parties are not fully satisfied

- notes the Daily Mail.

Militant leaders say they only take to the streets as long as the other side does. In their opinion, they are acting in accordance with the American constitution, which provides freedom to carry weapons. However, the protestors' respect for the law ends there. The problem is aggravated by posts on social networks that provoke impressionable people to take to the streets and more than emotionally express their protest there.


Trump and Democrats accuse each other of misjudging the situation in the country, but no one will deny that the US is swept by a wave of violence and street robberies - they flare up every time another black American is killed by police actions.

Some experts believe that one of the reasons for the surge in violence on the streets of America ahead of the elections is the ability to vote remotely.

Many more Democrats than Republicans will vote by mail - this could ensure the victory of the current owner of the White House right on election day

- say political analysts.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. Cyril Offline Cyril
    Cyril (Kirill) 21 September 2020 10: 01
    0
    America survived the 60s and 70s with the Black Panthers and massive antiwar demonstrations - it will also survive. Dump steam, make concessions to each other.
    1. 123 Offline 123
      123 (123) 21 September 2020 11: 49
      +1
      America survived the 60s and 70s with the Black Panthers and massive antiwar demonstrations - it will also survive. Dump steam, make concessions to each other.

      And don’t talk. yes Russia survived the 1905th and 1917th too, yes the 1991th. And these will survive. And the French do live without the Bastille. repeat Lucky for them to lose steam laughing
      I bet on Biden, the leader of the black panthers winked
      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
        Cyril (Kirill) 21 September 2020 13: 48
        -4
        Will survive without civil war. It requires much more serious contradictions than the already far-fetched racial conflict. There were such contradictions in RI at the beginning of the 20th century, but not here. They will rave, let off steam, make some concessions to each other and disperse. Not the first time. You will not be happy to contemplate the national bloody massacre in the very heart of the malicious and rotten capitalist world, you can calm down and drink a validolchik. And then the heart will still take.
        1. 123 Offline 123
          123 (123) 21 September 2020 15: 34
          +2
          In your fanatical belief in the "stronghold of democracy, progress and tolerance. I have no doubt
          I would like to clarify what kind of foundation it holds.

          It needs much more serious contradictions than the already far-fetched racial conflict. There were such contradictions in RI at the beginning of the 20th century, but not here.
          They will rave, let the steam out, make some concessions to each other and disperse. Not the first time.

          1) Why are you sure that everything is limited to racial conflict?
          2) Could you indicate the very contradictions that were in RI in the last century and are absent in the United States?
          3) It is very interesting what mutual concessions will make the slogan - peace, friendship, chewing gum - instantly come true?
          1. Cyril Offline Cyril
            Cyril (Kirill) 21 September 2020 15: 41
            +1
            In your fanatical belief in the "stronghold of democracy, progress and tolerance. I have no doubt

            "My fanatical faith" is only present in your rosy universe. In normal reality, however, I simply compare the scale of the contradictions in the United States of the 60s and today. Today there are fewer of them.

            Could you indicate the very contradictions that were in RI in the last century and are absent in the United States?

            Of course I could. In Ingushetia there were insurmountable contradictions between the ruling aristocracy, the bourgeoisie that was not oppressed, but had few rights, and the really oppressed peasantry and workers.

            It is very interesting, what mutual concessions will make the slogan - peace, friendship, chewing gum - instantly come true?

            Whites will make another formal handout in color, they will carry out some kind of reforms to smooth out social stratification.
            1. 123 Offline 123
              123 (123) 21 September 2020 15: 48
              0
              Of course I could. In Ingushetia there were insurmountable contradictions between the ruling aristocracy, the bourgeoisie that was not oppressed, but had few rights, and the really oppressed peasantry and workers.

              Clear yes It's useless to talk to you about such topics. In the exam, such questions did not come across ...

              Whites will make another formal handout in color, they will carry out some kind of reforms to smooth out social stratification.

              Blessed is he who believes winked

              You still haven't answered. Why are you sure that everything is limited to racial conflict?
              1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                Cyril (Kirill) 21 September 2020 20: 33
                0
                It is clear yes It is useless to talk to you about such topics. In the exam, such questions did not come across ...

                You should reconsider the questions on the exam. However, you even have to copy-paste the link of the problem, so much for you.

                Blessed is he who believes

                Is that why you are?

                Why are you sure that everything is limited to racial conflict?

                I said that it is largely contrived at the present time. You need to be able to read. There are certain contradictions between whites and people of color in the United States, but not strong enough to become the basis of a full-fledged civil conflict. The US political forces use this topic in the election race against each other, and nothing more.
                1. 123 Offline 123
                  123 (123) 21 September 2020 22: 26
                  0
                  I said that it is largely contrived at the present time. You need to be able to read. There are certain contradictions between whites and people of color in the United States, but not strong enough to become the basis of a full-fledged civil conflict. US political forces are using this topic in the election race against each other, and nothing more.

                  Now this is closer to reality good And here we should add the emerging serious problems in the economy. This is how, for example, the growth in the number of bacterial frauds in the oil and gas sector looks like.
                  These are mining companies:

                  https://www.haynesboone.com/-/media/files/energy
                  _bankruptcy_reports/oil_patch_bankruptcy_monitor.ashx?la=en&hash=D2114D98614039A2D2D5A43A61146B13387AA3AE

                  These are service:

                  https://www.haynesboone.com/-/media/files/energy
                  _bankruptcy_reports/oilfield_services_bankruptcy_tracker.ashx?la=en&hash=2BE6456FA3C1725E6C3588DE59C001602CD646DE

                  And there are enough problems in other industries as well.
                  For 9 months of this year, the money supply in circulation has grown by about 35%

                  https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M1

                  And this happened in the context of a falling economy, which means almost inevitable inflation, from which financially pampered Americans, by the way, have lost the habit. Moreover, this may not become a one-time event, but a permanent phenomenon.
                  https://news.yahoo.com/time-rein-fed-103011440.html

                  I suppose it's not worth reminding about the coronavirus, it only exacerbates the problems. So any panthers, no matter whether they are black or pink, are just flowers.
                  1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                    Cyril (Kirill) 22 September 2020 00: 51
                    -1
                    You obviously do not know history well, since you think that these problems in the United States manifested themselves for the first time in the country's existence :) The Great Depression, the Economic Crisis of the 70s, the 2008 depression hit the country's economy in the same way (and even stronger), but did not lead to a civil war.

                    Once again, for the gifted. The collapse of the national economy by itself does not lead to civil war. Insoluble contradictions between social groups lead to it. So it was in 1917 in Russia, so it was during the Meiji Restoration in Japan (although the civil war there was short and not particularly bloody), so it was in the United States itself during the war between the North and the South. Moreover, a civil war can start even with a relatively high level of the economy and the well-being of citizens.

                    So the coronavirus and the economic decline by themselves will not lead to a full-fledged civil war. They can only "add fuel to the fire" if there are insoluble and cardinal social contradictions.

                    And the solution is simple. Between the forces. confronted in the US election race, there is no particular difference. Whether the Democrats or the Republicans are mostly representatives of the same class, there are no cardinal contradictions between them. This is just a dirty struggle for power, affecting mostly the ruling apparatus, and not the entire nation as such.

                    But you can continue to hope that the "rotten heart of world imperialism" will finally fall :) Success.
                    1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
                      Bulanov (Vladimir) 22 September 2020 09: 47
                      +2
                      There are no particular differences between the forces that clashed in the US election race. Whether the Democrats or the Republicans are mostly representatives of the same class, there are no cardinal contradictions between them.

                      There are very big contradictions. Some are representatives of finance capital, others are industrial! And they have different means and methods of production and profit.
                      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 22 September 2020 09: 57
                        -1
                        there is no fundamental difference between financial capital and industrial capital. By the way, among the "industrialists" there are also Biden supporters, as among the "financiers" there are Trump supporters. Actually, Trump himself is a representative of non-industrial capital.
                      2. Essex62 Offline Essex62
                        Essex62 (Alexander) 22 September 2020 10: 10
                        -2
                        This contradiction is not diminished by mutual concessions. Nobody needs the bloody outcome of the confrontation between essentially homogeneous groups. Kamrad Cyril is right, the bed of the cut, colored paper printing press is very stable. There are no unsolvable contradictions, not ripe. And they will never mature, the fascist ideology of exclusivity is very attractive to the plebs, who do not want to think about things not related to the wallet and stomach.
                    2. 123 Offline 123
                      123 (123) 22 September 2020 11: 39
                      +1
                      You obviously do not know history well, since you think that these problems in the United States manifested themselves for the first time in the country's existence :) The Great Depression, the Economic Crisis of the 70s, the 2008 depression hit the country's economy in the same way (and even stronger), but did not lead to a civil war.

                      Once again, for the gifted. The collapse of the national economy by itself does not lead to civil war. Insoluble contradictions between social groups lead to it. So it was in 1917 in Russia, so it was during the Meiji Restoration in Japan (although the civil war there was short and not particularly bloody), so it was in the United States itself during the war between the North and the South. Moreover, a civil war can start even with a relatively high level of the economy and the well-being of citizens.

                      In itself, a fall in the economy does not lead to civil war. This is where everything rational in your words ended.

                      Talk about insoluble contradictions between social groups? Are not the "globalists" trying to squeeze Trump out of the light? Weren't the reasons for the American Civil War economic? Or do you think they were worried about the fate of the oppressed slaves? And in Ukraine, what social groups are fighting among themselves?

                      So the coronavirus and the economic decline by themselves will not lead to a full-fledged civil war. They can only "add fuel to the fire" if there are insoluble and cardinal social contradictions.

                      What do you mean if? There are two directly opposite, practically mutually exclusive views on the country's development path.

                      And the solution is simple. Between the forces. confronted in the US election race, there is no particular difference. Whether the Democrats or the Republicans are mostly representatives of the same class, there are no cardinal contradictions between them. This is just a dirty struggle for power, affecting mostly the ruling apparatus, and not the entire nation as such.

                      Are you serious? belay For the first time in years, the two groups clung to each other's throats in a power struggle. In contrast to the imitation of political struggle by the "Nanai boys" in previous years. The path the country will take depends on the victory of one of the groups and this will affect everyone.

                      But you can continue to hope that the "rotten heart of world imperialism" will finally fall :) Success.

                      It will not fall, but it really is rotten. But you don’t believe it? Otherwise it will be difficult, there is no one to worship, but you do not know how to do otherwise.
                      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 24 September 2020 18: 15
                        -2
                        In itself, a fall in the economy does not lead to civil war. This is where everything rational in your words ended.

                        Everything in my words is correct. The low level of economic development is not an independent cause of the civil war. It is caused by an insurmountable contradiction between individual social groups in this country.

                        Aren't the "globalists" trying to squeeze Trump out of the light?

                        Is Trump an "anti-globalist"? What are his actions confirming this? Protectionist measures? They were introduced more than once or twice in the United States and before.

                        Weren't the reasons for the American Civil War economic?

                        The reasons for any war are always economic. But the concept of "economic reasons" is not identical with the concept of "economic decline". Specifically, there was no economic crisis in the United States before the Civil War - on the contrary, the North was developing rapidly, and the South (not counting the part of the population that was in slavery) lived quite normally, trading in cotton and corn. The civil war there was for the following contradictions:

                        - contradictions in tax policy. The North introduced more and more taxes on goods imported from the South, and the South wanted to trade duty-free;

                        - The South opposed the policy of centralizing power and restricting the freedom of each state, which was pursued by the government of the Northern States. That is why, by the way, the Southern States officially called themselves the Confederation.

                        - The North pursued a policy of settling free (including former slaves) people on the colonized western lands, while the slave owners of the South saw them as a territory for expanding their slave holdings.

                        Thus, among the reasons for the Civil War in the United States were economic, yes, only "economic decline" among these reasons was not.

                        Or do you think they were worried about the fate of the oppressed slaves?

                        The emancipation of slaves was indeed an important point in the North's program. Not so much because of some moral reasons (although quite a few abolitionists in the North were guided by them), but because of economic ones - the North, with its rapidly developing industry, did not have enough labor, and the South, roughly speaking, did not want to share its slaves.

                        In general, the American Civil War is a typical example of a bourgeois revolution against feudalism. The only difference from the same wars in Europe or other countries is that the bourgeoisie and feudal lords in the United States were geographically dispersed. The first in the North, the second in the South.

                        The path the country will take depends on the victory of one of the groups and this will affect everyone.

                        Do you naively believe that the politics of the Democrats are fundamentally different from the politics of the Republicans? Do you think if Trump remains in power, the United States will stop trying to be the "world gendarme"? It seems like an adult, but you believe in fairy tales.

                        It will not fall, but it really is rotten.

                        No more than any other political system.

                        But you don’t believe it?

                        It is not a matter of faith or unbelief. This is a question of premises. At the moment, there are no sufficient prerequisites for the "fall of the US"

                        Otherwise it will be difficult, there is no one to worship, but you do not know how to do otherwise.

                        Don't project your need for religious belief in anything onto me.
                      2. 123 Offline 123
                        123 (123) 24 September 2020 19: 09
                        0
                        Everything in my words is correct. The low level of economic development is not an independent cause of the civil war.

                        Low level of economic development? belay We are talking about the United States and the economic decline. winked
                        The rest of the comment is no better, you got lost in your clinging to terms and wording. Straight kindergarten, pants with straps. I see no point in continuing the conversation. With me a minus. negative
                      3. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 24 September 2020 19: 19
                        -1
                        Low level of economic development? belay We're talking about the United States and the economic decline

                        Right. That's what I'm talking about - the economic decline is not an independent cause of the civil war. And in the United States at the moment there are no prerequisites for this war.

                        you get lost in your clinging to terms and phrases.

                        If for you observance of correct terminology is "clinging to terms and wording", then approx. Then why the hell are you trying to talk about "globalists" and "antiglobalists" if you don’t understand them?

                        Straight kindergarten, pants on the straps.

                        You said this to yourself perfectly.

                        With me minus

                        Oh how scary laughing Cons can only scare you.
                      4. 123 Offline 123
                        123 (123) 24 September 2020 19: 22
                        0
                        And in the United States at the moment there are no prerequisites for this war.

                        What prerequisites will suit you?

                        If for you observance of correct terminology is "clinging to terms and wording", then approx. Then why the hell are you trying to talk about "globalists" and "antiglobalists" if you don’t understand them?

                        True? Can you briefly describe the essence of Trump's conflict with globalists? Shkolota negative
                      5. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 24 September 2020 19: 29
                        -2
                        Trump's "anti-globalism", my naive old friend, is just a populist game for his electorate and a formal reason, within a certain framework, to reduce the funding of international organizations and other countries from the United States and thereby save money. Everything.

                        Trump does not even think to give up the locomotive of real globalism in the person of American TNCs :) In the same way, he will not abandon either the US cultural expansion or the military one.
  • steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 21 September 2020 10: 11
    0
    Faster! Let them live in a mess that they arrange for others, although I have a feeling that this is all artificially done.
  • gorenina91 Offline gorenina91
    gorenina91 (Irina) 21 September 2020 10: 55
    +1
    -Ha ... -Negros are left only from South Africa, Somalia and Congo to call their "brothers" for help (and there also Cuba and Brazil will catch up) ... -All America (USA) will become Negro in the blink of an eye ... -Joke...
    -If it goes on like this, then ... then ... then soon all the people who sailed there from Russia not so long ago will reach Russia ... -This people, basically ... -It is clear "who" ... - Here is the whole of Brighton Beach ... and it will sail away ... - And Israel ... - also not rubber ...
    - Goodbye America ... LLC ... -Hahah ...
    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
      Cyril (Kirill) 21 September 2020 13: 49
      0
      Why put an ellipsis after each word?
      1. 123 Offline 123
        123 (123) 21 September 2020 17: 57
        0
        Why put an ellipsis after each word?

        How are you worried about the USA laughing Here's an assembly of interesting facts on the standing of the financial system turned up. I decided to please you smile Would you like a few more interesting links in economics and finance to throw in to pacify before bed? winked

        1. Cyril Offline Cyril
          Cyril (Kirill) 21 September 2020 20: 28
          -1
          How are you worried about the USA

          I asked Irina why she puts an ellipsis after each word, but in some incomprehensible way you connected this with the fact that I was allegedly worried about the United States. Do you have an obsession? Compulsive states?
          1. 123 Offline 123
            123 (123) 21 September 2020 22: 00
            0
            I asked Irina why she puts an ellipsis after each word, but in some incomprehensible way you connected this with the fact that I was allegedly worried about the United States. Do you have an obsession? Compulsive states?

            As a rule, you don't ask Irina anything about points, but they are not present. This is from irritation at the content of the comment, and there is nothing to object. These are all little things.
            Did you like the video? Do you still see no prerequisites for the escalation of the conflict?
            1. Cyril Offline Cyril
              Cyril (Kirill) 22 September 2020 00: 56
              -1
              As a rule, you do not ask Irina anything about points, but they are not present.

              This time he asked. So what?

              This is from irritation at the content of the comment, and there is nothing to object

              It's just your speculation, I didn't even read her comment :)

              Did you like the video? Do you still see no prerequisites for the escalation of the conflict?

              Such videos are riveted every year by a carriage and a small cart, starting at least from the beginning of the 2000s :) Every year they promise that, tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, the United States will finally bend, the dollar will collapse, justice will prevail, etc. have been promising in various forms since 1917. During this time, the USSR has already collapsed, and the ruble managed to collapse a thousand times :) And the videos are all riveted. riveting, riveting :)
              1. 123 Offline 123
                123 (123) 22 September 2020 11: 04
                -1
                It's just your speculation, I didn't even read her comment :)

                I have not read it, but I condemn it? sad I'm talking about this, you reflexively rushed to defend the states, without even reading. laughing

                Such videos have been riveted every year by a wagon and a small cart, since at least the beginning of the 2000s :)

                Really rivet laughing And such and others. Remember why I offered you this one to look at?

                assembling interesting facts about the financial system

                But why do you need facts request Your faith is not "peace of mind" laughing You have only one answer:

                Every year they promise that, tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, the United States will finally bend, the dollar will collapse, justice will prevail, etc. Moreover, this has been promised in various forms since 1917. During this time, the USSR has already collapsed, and the ruble managed to collapse a thousand times :) And the videos are all riveted. riveting, riveting :)
                1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                  Cyril (Kirill) 22 September 2020 11: 17
                  -1
                  I have not read it, but I condemn it?

                  Excuse me, are you all right with the inter-ear nerve ganglion? I told her something about content her comment? No, I just asked why insert ellipsis after each word.

                  I’m talking about this

                  Yeah, you make it up yourself - you say it yourself.

                  you reflexively rushed to the defense of the states, without even reading.

                  You see the States everywhere. You should get some medical treatment, otherwise there is some mania :)

                  But why do you need facts

                  Videos are not facts, these are just opinions :) There is a Russian journalist, Mikhail Leontyev. He, too, in his program "However" and "documentaries" cited "facts" of the soon collapse of the dollar and the United States. It was back then when I was in school - more than 15 years ago.

                  But something didn’t fit together with the real facts :)

                  Fact 1: The dollar remains the world's main reserve currency

                  Fact 2: The United States remains the only superpower on the planet.

                  Fact 3: The United States did not fall apart, there was no civil war.

                  These are real facts :)
                  1. 123 Offline 123
                    123 (123) 22 September 2020 12: 07
                    +1
                    Videos are not facts, these are just opinions :) There is a Russian journalist, Mikhail Leontyev. He, too, in his program "However" and "documentaries" cited "facts" of the soon collapse of the dollar and the United States. It was back then when I was in school - more than 15 years ago.

                    For those with little talent, who have difficulty perceiving information, I repeat:

                    assembling interesting facts about the financial system

                    The author of the video lists real facts, figures, data. It is very convenient, everything is put together, no need to suffer with links to different sources. But this cannot be because Leontiev promised something there belay ... By the way, he still promises something, if he honestly did not delve into it.
                    Do you refuse to accept the data and consider everything as propaganda? I suggested that you familiarize yourself with the numbers and agree with someone's conclusions.

                    But something didn’t fit together with the real facts :)

                    What was that? You deny reality and argue that "Misha did not guess right" hi An answer in the style of "VYVSEVRETE" this cannot be because it can never be?

                    Fact 1: The dollar remains the world's main reserve currency
                    Fact 2: The United States remains the only superpower on the planet.
                    Fact 3: The United States did not fall apart, there was no civil war.
                    These are real facts :)

                    Are these three articles of faith? winked Is there a dollar and Musk is his prophet? sad

                    1900th year.
                    Fact 1: The Pound Remains The World's Main Reserve Currency
                    Fact 2: The sun never sets over the British Empire.
                    Fact 3: The British Empire did not fall apart, there was no civil war.

                    1980th year.
                    Fact 1: The ruble is used in 1/6 of the world and the Soviet financial system operates in the CMEA countries.
                    Fact 2: The USSR is one of the two superpowers on the planet.
                    Fact 3: The USSR did not collapse, the civil war did not start there.

                    The world, you know, changes sometimes. But for you this is unacceptable, it undermines fanatical faith.
                    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                      Cyril (Kirill) 24 September 2020 18: 23
                      -1
                      You deny reality and argue that "Misha did not guess right"

                      No. I gave you Misha as an example of the fact that even based on real facts (the same large US national debt), these facts can be interpreted erroneously.

                      An answer in the style of "VYVSEVRETE" this cannot be because it can never be?

                      I have never said that there will never be a total decline in the United States. I said that there are currently no sufficient prerequisites for this.

                      Are these three articles of faith?

                      These are three facts. They are there no matter how you feel about them.

                      The world, you know, changes sometimes. But for you this is unacceptable, it undermines fanatical faith.

                      Of course it does. And I fully admit that there may be a serious civil conflict in the United States. The only difference between you and me is that you see it as an imminent and inevitable, practically accomplished, and I regard it only as a hypothetical possibility.
                      1. 123 Offline 123
                        123 (123) 24 September 2020 19: 18
                        0
                        I have never said that there will never be a total decline in the United States. I said that there are currently no sufficient prerequisites for this.

                        What are the sufficient prerequisites?

                        Of course it does. And I fully admit that there may be a serious civil conflict in the United States. The only difference between you and me is that you see it as an imminent and inevitable, practically accomplished, and I regard it only as a hypothetical possibility.

                        What does fast and imminent mean? It already exists, the question is only in scale.
                      2. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 24 September 2020 19: 23
                        -1
                        What are the sufficient prerequisites?

                        The presence of real and irreconcilable contradictions between social groups. Not necessarily economic contradictions - there may be, for example, interethnic contradictions, as in Russia (in the South) or Yugoslavia. In the United States, there are no such contradictions.
                      3. 123 Offline 123
                        123 (123) 24 September 2020 19: 27
                        0
                        It's useless to talk to you, you're incorrigible fool
                      4. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 24 September 2020 19: 38
                        -1
                        I am not incorrigible, but facts. It is useless to argue with reality.
                      5. 123 Offline 123
                        123 (123) 24 September 2020 21: 47
                        +1
                        Data? belay

                        The presence of real and irreconcilable contradictions between social groups. Not necessarily economic contradictions - there may be, for example, interethnic contradictions, as in Russia (in the South) or Yugoslavia. In the United States, there are no such contradictions.

                        And interracial "contradictions" will not suit you?
                        How you define "conciliatory" or "irreconcilable" contradictions is a mystery. There are no criteria, right?
                        You will have, the Americans will do something and somehow settle everything. After all, these are the Americans laughing Hello hangers winked
                      6. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 25 September 2020 00: 41
                        -1
                        And interracial "contradictions" will not suit you?

                        They are not as deep now as they were in the 60s or 70s. But even then, this did not lead to civil war. Now the colored population is generally not prejudiced. And such outbreaks of interracial violence, as now, occur quite often in the United States. At least read about the riot in Detroit. And nothing, there was no civil war.
                      7. 123 Offline 123
                        123 (123) 25 September 2020 10: 54
                        0
                        Well, yes, well, yes, if there are contradictions, then they are not so deep, and if they are deep, then they will do something and everything will be fine. And in the elite, there are no contradictions and divisions, everything is imitation. It cannot be otherwise, because these are Americans smile
                        What is it with me? I'm trying to explain something to a fanatical adept. winked
                      8. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 25 September 2020 11: 04
                        -1
                        Well, yes, well, yes, if there are contradictions, then they are not so deep

                        Everything is correct. Those contradictions that are between the colored and white populations are now much less serious than they were in the middle of the 19th or 20th century. People of color have the same legal rights, there is no segregation. At the everyday level, racism persists, but the intensity is not the same for a long time.

                        I say - study, finally, the history of the United States of the 20th century. And 19 too. And you will see that racial conflicts like the current one happen very often in the United States - and nothing, none of them led to a civil war.

                        And in the elite, there are no contradictions and divisions, everything is imitation.

                        The elite is squabbling 2 political groups belonging to the same class. This, if you are closer to such an example, as the "left opposition" and the Stalinist group squabbled in the 30s. There, too, some were "globalists" (communism for the whole world and all that), others were "anti-globalists" (socialism in a single country and all that).

                        It cannot be otherwise, because these are Americans

                        It may well. But not in the situation we are discussing.

  • Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 21 September 2020 11: 01
    0
    Yes, there is an outbreak of violence every 10-15 years. Already accustomed, they will survive.

    And they left the news, it can be seen already fizzling out ...
  • Valentine Offline Valentine
    Valentine (Valentin) 21 September 2020 14: 03
    0
    Well no, guys, there all this will not dissipate by itself - the black population of America, former slaves, were given a taste of blood and freedom, and they, claiming several huge states like Texas, under their newly acquired state, will not miss this chance now , and without a civil war, this will not work, so the war for the United States will soon take place. The white and colored population of the country simply hate each other fiercely, and there will never be peace between them, after all that has happened, and America will very soon be washed in blood. and the reason for this will be the "wrong" presidential elections on both sides.
  • ***
    You're a bastard, Colombus, -
    I will say in honor.
    As for me,
    then i would
    in person -
    I would have closed America
    lightly brushed
    and then
    opened again -
    secondarily.

    ---
    1925
    Vladimir Mayakovsky.
    ***
    1. Pishenkov Offline Pishenkov
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 22 September 2020 23: 21
      +1
      ... it is not necessary to open it again, but to close it once and for all would be worth ...
  • Yurets Offline Yurets
    Yurets (Yuri) 25 September 2020 04: 46
    +1
    Or Yellowstone or Civil War! You don't need another. God, finally, must put an end to the abscess of the great earthly Evil! And Russia should help God in this
    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
      Cyril (Kirill) 25 September 2020 11: 05
      -1
      if Yellowstone, it will cover Russia as well. Mass starvation will begin. Is this what you want?
      1. Yurets Offline Yurets
        Yurets (Yuri) 28 September 2020 16: 01
        0
        I am ready to do anything to close the sad story of world Evil!
        1. Cyril Offline Cyril
          Cyril (Kirill) 28 September 2020 19: 47
          -1
          What naiiiiiv, already touching