Threat to the President: Russian Tu-160s held London at gunpoint in response to the appearance of B-52s in the Black Sea

On September 14, 2020, Sochi hosted a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko. While the leaders of the countries were negotiating, there were three US Air Force B-52H Stratofortress bombers flying from Fairford airbase in Great Britain in the skies over the Black Sea.

The B-52H was supported by three KC-135 Stratotanker air tankers, and reconnaissance and target designation were carried out by Sentinel R.1 aircraft of the British Air Force. Two US Air Force MC-130J Commando II transports have also pulled up to the region, they can carry out air refueling, but their main task is to provide and evacuate special forces.

In fact, a real special operation unfolded over the Black Sea, which posed a threat to the first person of Russia, as well as his colleagues from Belarus. Each B-52H is armed with two dozen cruise missiles or the same number of heavy guided bombs capable of striking outside the air defense zones of a potential enemy. In theory, the Americans could have taken an openly insane step and tried to destroy the top leadership of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus with one massive blow. It is clear that this is a fantasy scenario, but the very fact of such exercises of NATO aviation near the location of the Russian president makes one think.

It is significant that while the B-52H were over the Black Sea, two strategic missile carriers Tu-160 of the Russian Aerospace Forces (call signs 99111 and 99112, as well as board 99113, which worked as a communication relay), flying over the waters of the Barents and Norwegian Seas, entered the airspace of the North Atlantic. The flight duration was about 10 hours, according to the Russian Defense Ministry. At some stages of the route, they were accompanied by MiG-31 naval aviation of the Russian Navy. This information is confirmed by the telegram channel "Hunter's Notes", which is engaged in tracking the flights of Russian military and transport aircraft.

In fact, Russian missile carriers were at the point of a possible launch of the Kh-101 long-range cruise missiles (or the nuclear-powered Kh-102). Moscow has shown that in the event of a real threat to the life of the first person, it is ready to wipe London off the face of the earth, along with the local City, Downing Street and the royal family.
31 comment
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Volga073 Offline Volga073
    Volga073 (MIKLE) 15 September 2020 11: 19
    Molodtsy Russia!
    Another would be in Cuba and Venezuela such a launch for the Gulf of Mexico.
    1. rider Offline rider
      rider (Eugene) 16 September 2020 13: 42
      In Cuba there is a so-called. time base. But the Cubans are not opposed to the deployment of permanent basses of the Armed Forces and the Russian Navy.
  2. Volga073 Offline Volga073
    Volga073 (MIKLE) 15 September 2020 11: 22
    The Americans do not care about Moscow, London, or Ukraine ...
    This is all meat for them ..
    1. Dimon Dimonov Offline Dimon Dimonov
      Dimon Dimonov (Dimon Dimonov) 16 September 2020 14: 57
      So at home Americans always have someone to answer ... 1 ... 2 ... apl are constantly fishing in the Pacific or in the Atlantic and wait not long for about 6-8 minutes ... one thing is unpleasant - whether one rocket will hit or split on 10 warheads. Forewarned - in the center of decision-making ... and London is so ... for the company ...
    2. meandr51 Offline meandr51
      meandr51 (Andrei) 23 September 2020 16: 35
      Just like us on them. They are losers whose empire is crumbling before our eyes. And they cannot do anything. Even chubby Kim sent 3 of their carrier groups to a well-known address, promising a nuclear strike on them and their bases in case of anything. They swam where they were sent ...
  3. vladimir mudov Offline vladimir mudov
    vladimir mudov (vladimir mudov) 15 September 2020 14: 32
    Why is it impossible to "HIT" without tying it to the provocative actions of American aircraft near the borders of Russia? Need a reason? This reason can be found, Almost every day! So why, "can't be hit"?
    1. E-eh Surname Offline E-eh Surname
      E-eh Surname (E-eh Surname) 16 September 2020 14: 14
      because a bad peace is better than a good war, isn't it?
  4. Nikolay Malyugin (Nikolai Malyugin) 15 September 2020 16: 37
    Well done, you can’t say anything else. But then I read - "Kept at gunpoint London." Some kind of perverse imagination of military operations. Some say we will destroy America and it is time to celebrate victory. This will only be the beginning of a great war.
    1. margo Offline margo
      margo (margo) 15 September 2020 17: 48
      This will only be the beginning of a great war

      - and immediately the end. The brainless "couch troops" do not understand this.
      1. Siberian southerner (Sergey A) 15 September 2020 17: 54
        Western politicians do not understand this. They are confident in their exclusivity and invincibility. They would roll away from our borders, do not go with their advice and would live in peace. We will still survive, we have huge territories ... But how about Europe ...
      2. Dimon Dimonov Offline Dimon Dimonov
        Dimon Dimonov (Dimon Dimonov) 16 September 2020 15: 01
        Explain this to you and the NATO generals ... It is not Russia that is trying to get to them ... but they are to Russia
  5. Siberian southerner (Sergey A) 15 September 2020 17: 38
    Well, the military and intelligence know better where the wind blows from.
  6. Siberian southerner (Sergey A) 15 September 2020 17: 40
    America is that, we have an opera house older than it, but the tin islands have been muddying the waters for a long time ... And if that is a vivid example and are isolated from everyone.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. margo Offline margo
    margo (margo) 15 September 2020 17: 46
    Another horror story or delirium for schizophrenics or "Hurray for patriots" - call it what you want.
    1. rider Offline rider
      rider (Eugene) 16 September 2020 13: 45
      Well, not for the scumbags liberals and podnikov same. This does not give a damn about Russia and its people.
  9. pempus Offline pempus
    pempus (femistoklus paparanek) 15 September 2020 18: 19
    The last paragraph is a good thing ...
  10. Andrei Shtyubov Offline Andrei Shtyubov
    Andrei Shtyubov (andrey pieces) 15 September 2020 19: 08
    while they are afraid of us, we .. have nothing to fear! in fact neither give nor take ..! as they say !! considering the past .. !!
  11. Yuri Bryanskiy Offline Yuri Bryanskiy
    Yuri Bryanskiy (Yuri Bryansky) 15 September 2020 20: 13
    There should be a decision-making center on the crosshair - Fashington.
    1. arik rik Offline arik rik
      arik rik (arikrik) 15 September 2020 21: 29
      the problem is that you get to Fashington as if you walk to the moon ..
      1. akarfoxhound Offline akarfoxhound
        akarfoxhound 15 September 2020 21: 40
        Maximum 22-23 minutes of flight. Personally, do you walk for such a length of time before the moon? laughing
      2. Dimon Dimonov Offline Dimon Dimonov
        Dimon Dimonov (Dimon Dimonov) 16 September 2020 15: 05
        6-8 minutes from the Atlantic ... they won't even float ... or even better to drive a wave ... one on the US coast ... and the other to Europe ... no missiles .. no bombers ... 150-200 meters will be sufficient ...
    2. rider Offline rider
      rider (Eugene) 16 September 2020 13: 47
      Strange as it may seem, but the Thane are heavily influenced by the Naglo-Saxons.
  12. RFR Offline RFR
    RFR (RFR) 15 September 2020 21: 39
    That's how it should be, and a couple more had to be near Washington so that the gay Europeans would not relax ...
  13. Elen_msk Offline Elen_msk
    Elen_msk (Elena Belyakova) 16 September 2020 01: 12
    Another would be ours to emerge somewhere ... unexpectedly, in such a situation! Let them do it out of fear!
  14. Raxmatillo Djabbarov (Raxmatillo Djabbarov) 16 September 2020 04: 36
    Putin ... UN ... boots ... Kuzkina's mother ... otherwise they will crush Russia
  15. Ivan the Bessmertny (Ivan) 16 September 2020 06: 58
    Ay yes Shoigu - well done
  16. Alkatrass A Offline Alkatrass A
    Alkatrass A (Alkatrass A) 16 September 2020 10: 43
    Sheer nonsense. Keep the top officials at gunpoint, but damn the science fiction section nervously smokes on the sides. Exploration, no more
  17. Signeur Tomato Offline Signeur Tomato
    Signeur Tomato (Signeur Tomato) 16 September 2020 23: 50
    This is the relationship between the countries. One can envy! But we will die as martyrs, and they will simply die. How do you prefer?
  18. DPN Offline DPN
    DPN (DPN) 17 September 2020 09: 05
    Mutual scarecrows, nothing has changed since the times of the USSR, we are all under the gun, only now we are in a less advantageous position due to the stratification of the population. Who wants to lose a foreign state.
  19. alexprint1 Offline alexprint1
    alexprint1 (Alexander) 17 September 2020 10: 44
    NATO generals are seriously complaining that Russia is moving closer and closer to the borders of NATO countries ...
  20. meandr51 Offline meandr51
    meandr51 (Andrei) 23 September 2020 16: 37
    It is necessary to shoot a blockbuster on the theme of nuclear war in the United States and Europe and roll it around the world. This is more effective for the electorate than any maneuvers. Yes, and cheaper.