Putin and Lukashenko managed to replay the most creative "color revolution" in the world

25

An outside observer, analyzing the events of the last month related to the attempted “color coup” in Belarus, submitted to him through the box, should increasingly be inclined to think that Putin, together with Lukashenka, defeated everyone, beating the opposition in an open confrontation (if not with one left, then two), and now they are only conducting rearguard battles of local significance (that is, they finish off any local nonsense that has come out with a butt).

And this happened only because they were opposed not by the forces of the united collective West, but by small mongrels from Warsaw and Vilnius. I myself insisted on a similar point of view. Like, not according to Senka, a hat, the wrong ones were attacked, learn materiel or take poison and kill yourself against the wall. And we, Grigorych and Vladimirovich, all in white and sparkling armor, having counted all the steps of the Polish-Lithuanian vocational schools, two moves ahead, we fly forward on our mighty armored train, we stop in the commune (that is, in the Union State, well, you understand) ...



But now, rewinding the film back, I understand that the daddy in his RB really faced a hardened enemy who took into account all the mistakes and lessons of previous Maidans, and approached the Belarusian fully armed, creatively changing tactics during the game and instantly reacting to all changes to chalkboard. And these unfinished Polish-Lithuanian revolutionaries are losing their party not at all because they played poorly or not prepared enough, but because they got a hardened opponent who is ready to die but not surrender, in contrast to the soprano from the capital city of Kiev, who performed duties 6 years ago President of the then neighboring state.

And here in Minsk, rolled technology "Color revolutions" for some reason failed. Although before that it worked like a clock. And in Kyrgyzstan, and in Georgia, and in Armenia, I generally keep quiet about Ukraine. And before that in Tunisia, Egypt, Morocco, Yemen, Algeria, Jordan, Bahrain, Oman. In Syria and Libya, this led to civil wars. Iraq lost its independence, and the Libyan Jamahiriya disappeared altogether as a state. You yourself know everything about Yugoslavia, tore the country to pieces. Kuwait, Lebanon, Sudan, Djibouti, Saudi Arabia, Western Sahara and Mauritania also did not pass this cup, only without such dire consequences. The only misfire is Tiananmen Square and Hong Kong, but there are damned Chinese communists, with them only a nuclear bomb. Agree, a beautiful track record, the Polish-Lithuanian revolutionaries had someone to take an example from.

And they took it, in some ways even surpassing their teachers, while showing amazing flexibility and adaptability to all countermeasures of the opposing side. And now I will show you their achievements.

Know-how No. 1: They immediately abandoned the use of protest leaders. Faced with a situation when all the opposition was cleaned out by the daddy, who was in the ground, who was in prison, who was on the run, they, as a single leader and center for decision-making, first used an Internet resource in the form of the NEXTA telegram channel, which the authorities failed to block. This resource acted as a single center of resistance, coordinating the protest of the masses and raising the people to rebellion, non-stop supplying 1 million of its subscribers with fresh information and action plans. This is a new word in the organization of "color revolutions". This have not happened before!

Know-how No. 2: Faced with an effective forceful opposition from the authorities, our creators immediately "gutted" the protest, for the first time using the tactics of a "wandering", "blinking" Maidan, which was called a "partisan" (RB is a partisan land!) and capture of squares and office buildings.

Know-how No. 3: When the security forces suppressed the "partisans" with mobile OMON groups, they switched to the tactics of courtyard Maidans in residential areas, whose members were personally acquainted and communicated with each other via mobile communications. Actions of mass disobedience and demonstrative protest began to be used there (cars with signals on, flashing lights in apartments, people clapping their hands on the side of the road).

Know-how No. 4: For the first time in the history of color revolutions, organizers tried to use labor collective strikes as a method of pressure on the authorities. And even succeeded in this. MAZ, BelAZ, BMZ, MTZ, METZ, MMZ, Belshina, Grodno-Azot, BelZhD and a number of other enterprises have taken this bait. But in general, this protest was drowned, only 27% of enterprises in the country supported it. Old Man suppressed them with an iron hand (stupidly dismissing all the strikers).

Know-how No. 5: Here the old man distinguished himself by using female special forces against the female protest (the girls are so beautiful, all in white and with flowers).

Know-how No. 6: When the women's protest drowned out due to the fact that they began to simply ignore it (stand, well, wait until you get bored!), The organizers transformed it into a youth one. Young people, as the most protest part of society, were used always and everywhere, what to take from the fools? Students, in a word ... Old Man found how to influence them. The boys were simply immediately drafted into the army, removing the reservation of the institutes, moreover, right during the protests. If you don't want to join the army, stay at home or at lectures.

Know-how No. 7: The organizers were not limited to any one social group, trying to involve more and more in the protest. Workers, office workers, youth, IT-specialists, office plankton, football and hockey ultras, criminals, cultural intelligentsia, journalists (even state media) - these friends were attracted. FROM political elites, security officials, athletes and regional elites (city mayors, directors' corps) did not work. Old Man resisted, and the elites did not run. The monolithic nature of the Belarusian governing structures was maintained solely due to the external factor of the Russian-Chinese legitimization of the election results and due to the personal qualities of Lukashenko.

But it must be admitted that in the Republic of Belarus, dad faced one of the most creative examples of organizing a "color revolution" in the world. Flexible, systemic, consistent, multilevel, socially adapted, from the church to hockey fans and criminals. All this from the side resembled a fire in a forest, when firefighters manage to suppress the grassroots fire, it suddenly flares up from above and walks along the crowns, jumping from one dry tree to another. When a mounted fire is covered from a helicopter, it goes under the grass mat and seems to disappear to flare up again in another place.

As a result of all these events, the bottom line can be stated that at the moment Lukashenka managed to maintain control over the state, and the protesters won the right to protest. But as the protests stagnate and the number of their participants decreases, the window of opportunity for displacing the hated "tyrant" is shifting to the left. The element of fatigue and psychological burnout plays into the hands of the current government. The dynamics of protests is negative. The crisis persists, but in a smoldering form. A way out of it for the current government is possible through the translation of political demands into social ones with a gradual fading of the protest. And if this does not succeed, then only through a referendum and a constitutional reform with the change of the presidential form of government to a parliamentary-presidential one, where a balance of power will be achieved between the opposition and the government. But under the current president, the latter option is impossible.

Which exit? Sooner or later, the old man, but before the expiration of his powers, will have to leave and hand over the affairs to the Kremlin's protege, whom we do not know yet, but he will definitely appear. And the Polish-Lithuanian vocational schools, who have shown themselves to be good students of Gene Sharp, will only have to hope to represent their interests in the Belarusian parliament through the fragments of the opposition that passed through the crucible of the White Maidan.

As a result of all these events, as always, Putin won, who came one step closer to his long-standing idea of ​​creating a Union State, once again proving to his enemies that in politics he can do everything except to lose. And he could not lose in Belarus, because the technologies for carrying out such movements were tested there already in Russia in 2024. And their number is already known - March 17.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    15 September 2020 08: 27
    The Russians are already accustomed to living the way they live, neither poor nor rich, everyone has clogged refrigerators, and everyone also has cars, and many have more than one, so the standard of living will not push our people to any illegal actions with with the help of the "pointing and guiding" hand of Washington, but we have the only "Achilles' heel" - an international issue in the vastness of our country. Multiculturalism is wonderful, religion - choose any religion you like, but if interethnic strife begins and the primacy of national priorities rises , which is already being done in some of our republics, then the whole country will start to go crazy, and this will already be "Russian revolt, senseless and merciless", but with a bias along ethnic lines, and our dear ones will be the puppeteers of all subsequent actions " partners "from Langley and the State Department lovers of" color revolutions "affecting our purely local seamy side, both ethnic and religious. But will they be able, after what happened in Ukraine and Belarus, to shake Russia in four years, so much so that it immediately crumbles, like the USSR - and all this will depend on us, and with the softness of our authorities, the worst for country option is not excluded.
    1. +2
      19 September 2020 22: 25
      Our unity was saved and will be saved by the Soviet Union, where we got along well with different peoples, the memory of our friendship will save us, and I personally believe that in the future we will be united again. Those people who still see the Soviet Union in Russia came to Russia.
  2. -5
    15 September 2020 08: 35
    dad faced one of the most creative examples of organizing a "color revolution" in the world. Flexible, systemic, consistent, multilevel, socially responsive, from church to hockey fans and criminals

    In general, nothing new has happened in Belarus. That was not the case before in 1917, 1848 and even 1825. Not to mention the Ukrainian Maidans.
    And this is treated not by repression, but by the ability to conduct a dialogue with the people. And then the whole people will sincerely cry about the death of the dictator (as at the death of Stalin). And then there will be no color revolutions.
    1. +3
      15 September 2020 13: 33
      Quote: Jack clubs
      but the ability to conduct a dialogue with people

      Just specify - with the American "people".

      And then there will be no color revolutions.

      Cho, Irish orphans starving to death?
      Color revolutions - to the arrival of American corporations to rob the colored Papuans.
      A company came to Georgia. Look for gas and oil. For 10 years I have not found anything, but received 100 million US dollars from the Georgian budget. The Georgian prime minister decided to close the shop, but a shout from the White House - and the office again drills the depths of the Georgian budget.
    2. +1
      19 September 2020 22: 27
      And also Belarus was saved by the Victory Parade, which the old man held on May 9.
  3. -8
    15 September 2020 08: 55
    Wah!
    And on other patriotic sites yesterday I read exactly the opposite articles.
    That Lukashenko leaked everything, betrayed Russia, Putin will change him. Straight 130%.

    But in fact, 80% of the vote, and the victory over the students standing in their socks on the benches, and the ankle boots on the ribs of any students, and the sudden maneuvers of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bashkortostan near the borders are a great "reversal".

    Putin, as always, defeated everyone, it's a pity they don't know about it. Except for retirees at the store shelves.
    1. 123
      +2
      15 September 2020 11: 25
      But in fact, 80% of the vote, and the victory over the students standing in their socks on the benches, and the ankle boots on the ribs of any students, and the sudden maneuvers of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bashkortostan near the borders are a great "reversal".

      Everybody jokes laughing "Students" are instructed not to take off their sneakers, you can admire.

      https://www.youtube.com/post/UgyXQYk0-aEUQYZdmtN4AaABCQ

      Such ankle boots should be on the bread, not on the ribs.
  4. +1
    15 September 2020 11: 08
    Quote: Sergey Latyshev
    and ankle boots on the ribs of any students, and sudden maneuvers of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus near the borders are a great "peremoga".

    Few. it should have been more energetic. now they will try to dig trenches for shooting while standing ... from a horse. learn the freedom to love. evading military service is a serious crime. will run to the meadow. there they will be fed for a couple of months and then ... well, girls on the panel, creative boys will also fit instead of girls - there were plenty of them at the rallies. and then what?
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. -8
    15 September 2020 12: 23
    The author should be made Minister of Propaganda, like Dr. Goebbels.
    To begin with, not believing in its sky-high rating of 80%, AG imprisoned all candidates who could compete with it before the elections (this largely contributed to the protests), but this did not help either! AG did not even get the shameful 5%. I dare to remind you that in 1996, hated by all the people, such ... as Yeltsin gained 6%. But respected AH, I didn't even hold out to them. One can only guess how the Belarusians hate the AG. Further, the AG made a mistake one after another, some 33 Wagnerians, nonexistent maneuvers of NATO countries and, as the pinnacle of inadequacy, a very cruel dispersal of peaceful marches.
    The riot police, as always, were at their best, give the fool a truncheon in his hands, he will beat his mother and father. Where then the pigeons will run, as when the same Berkut, they do not think, the riot police do not have enough convolutions for this. Of course, our Kremlin Swindler will accept a part, it will be the most frostbitten part of his guardsmen, they will dig the earth for the right to live here. But it will be difficult to accept everyone, there are plenty of their own parasites.
    By the way, after reading this wonderful opus in the morning. I asked Belarusians working for us, how are the protests there? They said that the number of people in the protests has increased. The protests were so massive that even the workers began to strike, until now there was no where! It is possible to fire all workers and toss subpoenas into the army to all students, but this will only slightly prolong the agony of the regime. Usse, basta, swam AG to its end. Now he may not finish like Kadaffi and quietly become a neighbor of Yanukovych. But if they continue to cling to power and there are numerous victims, then I do not envy him.
    And, of course, our Great Swindler, with a twisted run, defeated everyone and everything, to the Armenia and Ukraine we lost, there was also really Bratsk Belarus. It was necessary to do so (truly in Putin's way) out of the blue! If earlier there was a chance in building the USSR 2.0, if not immediately, but in the long term, now everyone has arrived. The senile ambitions of the Great Combinator dispersed all countries from us, from neutral to friendly.
    1. +3
      15 September 2020 13: 45
      Quote: Cudgel
      AG jailed before the elections all candidates who could compete with him

      Gee. In the American elections, propaganda of opposition candidates on all-American channels is generally prohibited. Only members of the Politburo of the Democratic Party. Do you know that there are from 5 to 9 candidates for the US presidency? Some independent candidates are billionaires. But billions are not enough to get into candidate debates. Fuck in the gateways of all states, but at the national level - no, no, demopublikanny activists shoot to kill.

      1. -7
        15 September 2020 14: 07
        Propaganda is prohibited and imprisoned, there is still a difference. And then, no matter what happens, no matter how Great and Multi-Pass the American President turns out to be, after 2 terms he will leave. And not like we do, they cheated three times under one person with a constitution, or like AG, they rewrote it for themselves even earlier.
        Obama is certainly not a billionaire. And Trump made himself, and not privatized American property.
        Americans don't give a damn about Trump or Obama. And honestly, I don't care who they choose. And the author is peradd by the presidential administration, maybe they will notice and throw some money or arrange it on RT. Putin loves lackeys, Sobchak himself wore a briefcase! And there is an example of Kholmansky, Kholmansky licked one place to the Great Combinator from shop managers to the board of directors of UVZ, and then even higher.
        So "young men pondering life .." instead of the correct way of life, they are offered to lick the authorities one place. There were many of these in the Pro-Putin movements, and even now there are.
        About the bell is about you putinoids. You are being chased to rallies by the pro-Putin and to the vote, but you hum and the whole herd go.
        1. +3
          15 September 2020 15: 38
          In the US, it doesn't matter who the president is. He usually pursues the interests of his group, and the first to fall out of the loop is billionaire Trump. For this, the Democrats extinguish him for his entire term. Up to the Maidan and the civil war. We haven't seen the most interesting yet. Obama did not stand out in this regard. He unleashed a new war, received a Nobel Prize for this, now his fortune is about 240 million dll, that is, a quarter of a billionaire))
          In the United States, I repeat, it does not matter, the interests of the group are respected during the change of power (not the interests of the people!). The planning of government programs is also preserved through continuity. By and large, this is what matters - how far the state is able to make plans and implement. With elections every 4 years, the maximum planning horizon is 5-6 years, while many projects start working for 10-20-30 years. Take Britain - the queen sits in power her entire life, with maximum power. Merkel in Germany is probably the same as the AG sits. So no example.
          Well, the distribution of labels to opponents in the best traditions of Goebbels.
          1. -7
            15 September 2020 18: 09
            He does not pursue the interests of his group, they have a system of balances. And they will not be particularly impudent, because after the Democrats there will be Republicans and therefore decency must be observed in order not to slip into war. Obama did not make money on the privatization of American property and did not make billionaires from his cronies of small St. Petersburg traders at the expense of state orders.
            Well, we also have a stigma in the gun. Sarkozy admitted that we were not the aggressors in 2008, but nevertheless we fought there. And who first started is very controversial. And it is unlikely that Georgia, with its microscopic army, really wanted to attack us. With the same success, Moldova can attack us, the same chances. Wars in Chechnya, now in Ukraine. Also, not a special peacefulness does not pull. And the wars of the Americans with anyone, not an indulgence for the eternal rule of Putin and his oligarchy.
            Britain has secured the special status of the Queen not only of Great Britain, but also of the British Commonwealth. And everyone understands the ceremonial nature of this government.
            With Merkel, the situation is the same, there are no restrictions, so she still sits. And in Germany, in principle, there can be no situation when the constitution is changed for the sake of some politician.
            We like to nod at Merkel, only there she sits legally, but it is not right that there are no restrictions, but there are no violations of Merkel in her sitting. We have the First Swindler, he violated the constitution three times. Perhaps he believed in his genius, or sycophants whispered that he was cooler than Stalin, Peter and Brezhnev. Achievements of the Kremlin Swindler - zero, so coincidentally, his reign had high prices for raw materials, but he flushed all the profit from high prices down the toilet.
            Yes, American presidents, like French and Finnish ones, do not defend the power of the people (citizens of these countries). They set the subsistence minimum at 180 dollars, and pensions at 170. Here we have another matter, the Guarantor cares about the people day and night, he even had to raise the retirement age so that the men would not get drunk on early retirement.
        2. +3
          15 September 2020 22: 18
          Quote: Cudgel
          no matter how great and multi-way the American president turns out to be, after 2 terms he will leave.

          His nephew, cousin, son will come at last. Do you not know that all American presidents are relatives? From Washington to Kennedy, Old English families, Johnson to Obama, Irish families.
          The US in the presidency is like North Korea, Azerbaijan and Saudi Arabia, by tradition. Even in Honduras there is no such thing.
          1. -5
            16 September 2020 11: 19
            There were two relatives of the presidents - Bushy. Of course, a dishwasher from McDonald's will not get into the US presidency. And it's understandable that the chances of an Ivy League graduate are higher than anyone else. But it should be noted that if an American graduated from a university from these three, then he is very cool. Further, they (future presidents) begin their political careers from the bottom and not all reach the state governors, mayors, and even more so presidents.
            Regarding the presence of the DNA of the royal families of England in the noble blood of American presidents, it is also understandable, marriages are concluded among their own. The percentage of DNA from the British there is not very large, I think the Russians, with the exception of the Pomors, have a high percentage of the DNA of nomadic peoples. But no one says that we are all descendants of Genghis Khan. I repeat, but the power of the President of the United States is very strongly limited by other political institutions and is comparable to the powers of the President of the Russian Federation.
            The Asian style of government is typical for us and the entire post-Soviet space, the Americans and Europeans do not have such a thing. And for a little sexual affair or spying on other candidates for the presidency there, you can fly out of the presidency with a bang.
            And we can give out government contracts to our friends for the right and left. And with a childhood friend, a couple of billions to go offshore. After the offshore in an amount 100 times less than Putin and Raldugin were stuck, the American president would have been fishing for a long time in retirement.
            The Kremlin Swindler could have created a normal political system, with fair elections, competition and competition between politicians, but then against this background he would look like a schoolboy against Tyson, that is, without a single chance to become the president of the Russian Federation.
            And as a result, we have what we have. The poor leader of the country and the same poor vertical of power created by him. Well, and the TV, which tells us about the breakthroughs, cunning moves and genius of Putin.
            1. +3
              16 September 2020 17: 02
              Quote: Cudgel
              There were two relatives of the presidents - Bushey.

              Back in 1904 or 1910, two Irishmen set foot on the United States, arriving on the same ship. The last name of one is Bush, the other is Reagan. They emigrated from the same village.
              There were 2 presidents named Roosevelt. Roosevelt the second was the six-uncle nephew of Roosevelt the first, and the wife of the second Roosevelt was pa-pummmm! - was a native niece. Moreover, Roosevelt was the first in the female line a descendant of Washington itself.
              Yes, the commoner Lincoln has crept into the cohort of presidents. But it was quickly cleaned up for the abolition of slavery. Now Trump has broken the family idyll.
            2. +2
              16 September 2020 20: 26
              The fact is that there are two opposing factions in the FSA, I hope you know which ones, both have huge influence in all directions, as well as financial opportunities. The only resource for which they fight is the people's voices. In Russia, the opposite situation is one party that does not have worthy competition (the Communist Party, the Liberal Democratic Party, etc. are not counted, they have grown together in monetary ecstasy with the Kremlin), mired in corruption, here connections and money decide. That is why we have elections-circus tent.
        3. +1
          19 September 2020 22: 48
          Come on. Are you seriously? For a long time, the people mostly do not go to voting. It feels like people DO NOT KNOW THAT THE QUANTITATIVE QUALITATIVE PRESENCE FOR A LONG LONG TIME. But he also does not go because he does not want to take responsibility for the actions of the President and his team. And so there was such a spread that the people do not go to the elections and do what they want, and the President takes advantage of this and also does what he wants. Partly I like it, this version of freedom. If we say that the power is a man, and the people are a wife, then in our country a husband and wife are used to it and relaxed, poured, oppressed - and live again.
  7. 0
    15 September 2020 13: 06
    A new form of coup. It's a pity the times are "herbivorous", "city foam" cannot be put in camps like in Germany, you can't shoot from a machine gun in the moat of a French fortress you look smarter you would become
    1. +1
      15 September 2020 13: 55
      Well, there is Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, where opponents of the American regime are being destroyed. Including from the EU. Good, kosher precedent good ...
      1. +1
        17 September 2020 09: 56
        They can, we can’t - this is what is insulting
  8. +1
    15 September 2020 13: 39
    Convinced of their hypocrisy towards their peoples!
  9. -1
    15 September 2020 13: 53
    As a result, a completely redundant structure - the KGB of the Republic of Belarus - has emerged in Belarus.
    There is no sense in their existence at all.
  10. RFR
    +2
    15 September 2020 21: 36
    Too many would-be scribblers have divorced something, they invent all sorts of garbage ...
  11. -5
    16 September 2020 10: 23
    Custom article, turned everything upside down, disgusting to read