Legitimacy will end: what signal did Putin send by announcing his readiness to bring forces to Belarus

August 31 2020 15

Vladimir Putin earlier announced that a reserve of security officials has been formed in the Russian Federation, who, in the most unfavorable development of events, can intervene in Belarusian affairs. What signals does the Russian president send by announcing his readiness to bring forces into Belarus? Experts of the Ukrainian edition "Glavred" argue about this.

The introduction of Russian troops into the Republic of Belarus is very unlikely - information about such a possibility resembles a PR move, because if such a scenario is realized, the Russians will oppose the bulk of the Belarusian population.

Even Alexander Lukashenko himself does not need military actions of Russia in Belarus - after all, as soon as Russian troops are brought into Belarus, his legitimacy as the country's president will end immediately. An authoritative leader of the state cannot allow this to happen

- Ukrainian experts believe.

With his statements, Vladimir Putin gives a signal to the Belarusian president - on the one hand, supporting him, and on the other, warning him not to make any sudden moves, given his recent anti-Russian statements.

By announcing the possibility of using force to influence the internal situation in Minsk, Moscow is signaling to the West that the Russian Federation is monitoring the situation and, if necessary, ready to take decisive action. Russia has all the resources to correct the delicate balance political forces in Belarus in their favor, according to the Ukrainian edition.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Pacifist

+5

31 August 2020 11: 22

On the phrase

Ukrainian experts believe

- could have finished ... both their conclusions themselves and their competence, at the level of the bottom of the manure pit.
1. Vladimir Tuzakov
  
  -5
  
  31 August 2020 13: 05
  
  The precedent is very dangerous, because the Russian Federation, represented by V. Putin's statement, is opposed to the majority of the youth of Belarus, which will further result in the rejection of the state of Belarus from the Russian Federation ... Who directs the policy of the Russian Federation, all foreign policy (and internal) actions of the Russian Federation, as if organized by internal enemies of Russia, and to the detriment of Russia ...
  1. BMP-2
    
    +5
    
    31 August 2020 13: 19
    
    Do you want to say that the youth of Belarus is a different people? Well, then, look at Ukraine: the fear in due time to reason with the "onizhedey" has led to the fact that now the country is rotten by 0,5 percent of the maddened radicals. And regarding the "show of force" - it really does not work: in the same 2014, Putin already took permission from the Duma to use troops, but he never used them. But in vain.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov
      
      -1
      
      31 August 2020 13: 31
      
      You are missing today's main weapon - propaganda and pressure on the top management of states. Both in Ukraine and in the Russian Federation, most are tied with money and relatives with foreign states ... As Z. Brzezinski said, we need to see whose oligarchs (and the government), if their money and families are with us (in the USA, etc. .) ...
      1. A.Lex
        
        +1
        
        31 August 2020 18: 19
        
        Tuzakov, nonsense! Yes, there were oligarchs in Russia, now - no. And here is the very moment to determine what this word means in the modern sense. So: an oligarch is a representative of big business, included in the leadership of the country OR influencing the foreign and domestic policy of the country (without occupying, directly, leading positions in the country).
        Let's return to your lie - name at least one who fits the criterion of defining an "oligarch" in the Russian government?
        
        Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        -3
        
        31 August 2020 21: 29
        
        The Rotenbergs, who took the first position of the richest, then the leaders of the leading state-owned companies ... The old oligarchy was replaced at the level of state robbery by new ones under the guise of V. Putin - in fact, screens (not a single Presidential Decree was implemented by the government) ...
        
        A.Lex
        
        +1
        
        1 September 2020 20: 36
        
        Tuzakov, are you responsible for your words, accusing Rotenberg of the oligarchy? Did it ever occur to you that VVP used that very R. and those like him? I used all of them in a confrontation with these very oligarchs, didn't you think? What amazes me like you is the narrow-mindedness of thinking! Keep up the good work, so that the people will see who is pouring into their ears about the "bad GDP". It immediately becomes clear what you want for the people - what is happening in Ukraine and what almost happened in Belarus! You are fully revealed - keep up the good work!
        
        Vladimir Tuzakov
        
        -3
        
        1 September 2020 21: 54
        
        Over the 20 years of V. Putin's rule, the disintegration of statehood has only stabilized, but further development, except for the withdrawal of fossils, is not visible .. The main thing, I doubt over the past 10 years, is that the real V. Putin is alive, because in plain sight only under the doubles of different make-up personalities. ..
    2. A.Lex
      
      +1
      
      31 August 2020 18: 26
      
      Vladimir V., there was no point in bringing in troops in the Ukrainian direction. Everything was rotten there and should have collapsed anyway. And we are there - only to lose people without any benefit. In the Crimea - there, yes, there was a lot, because The overwhelming majority of the population was (at least) against the coup. And the "Chinese" warning of the GDP is for those who wanted to "help" those who have lost all fear - the so-called countries. West. And also to those who wanted to continue the protests according to the ukroscenario - smash everything, seize police stations, seize weapons in units.
      1. BMP-2
        
        +1
        
        5 September 2020 16: 18
        
        there was no point in sending troops in the Ukrainian direction
        
        Well, how to say: the same Kharkov on March 1, 2014 went out to the square, put the Natsiks on his knees, made an appeal to Putin ... then for a long time even the nazbats who appeared in the city walked with their tails between their legs. But in the end, the allegedly "pro-Russian" local elite merged the protests, the most active Protestants were cleaned out, the city gradually began to fill with all kinds of cattle, which grew bolder, painted everything in colors that it painted, and hung yellow and blue symbols of shame ... In 2014, there were no more than a few dozen Natsiks. There were not much more of those who sympathized with them.
Netyn

0

2 September 2020 20: 32

Quote: Pacifist
On the phrase

Yes, we have enough such experts and on Topkor - yes, even Irina and Seryozha tax Ukrainian experts and British scientists in the minus.
Netyn

+1

2 September 2020 20: 34

Quote: BMP-2
now the country is rotten by 0,5 percent of the frenzied radicals

Why maddened? They are funded by the clown apparatus and Avakov and follow orders. Well, they put the drug trade on stream and raised it for themselves.
1. BMP-2
  
  +1
  
  5 September 2020 16: 04
  
  Quote: Netyn
  They are funded by the clown apparatus and Avakov and follow orders.
  
  I agree. Let me explain my idea: a normal person will never mock others for money. Those who go for it definitely have deformations in the moral and ethical sphere. That is, the sick. And those who finance and go for it are also deliberately - of course, criminals.
Netyn

0

2 September 2020 20: 36

Quote: A.Lex
In the Crimea - there, yes, there was a lot, because The overwhelming majority of the population was (at least) against the coup.

Yes, do not care about the aborigines and their Wishlist. Crimea, as well as the Kuriles, is a question of nat. security.
Netyn

0

6 September 2020 14: 12

Quote: BMP-2
a normal person will never bully others for money. Those who go for it definitely have deformations in the moral and ethical sphere. That is, the sick.

Well, Natsik began to be financed by the president with the party nickname Vegetable.