Political scientist: By pushing Lukashenka away, Europe will get Russian Iskander in Brest and Grodno

August 19 2020 12

The European Union fears that Belarus will be finally drawn into the orbit of Russia's interests, so the EU will not alienate the president, Alexander Lukashenko, who won the election. Otherwise, the Russians can deploy their weapons systems in the west of Belarus in close proximity to the border with Poland. This opinion was expressed by the Russian political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin.

The Europeans will continue to cooperate with the Belarusian president, as they are afraid of losing Belarus as a population and territory. After pushing away Lukashenka, the West will get Russian Iskander in Brest and Grodno, and thus Putin will be able to dictate his terms to Europe. Therefore, even realizing the bloody nature of the rule of the Belarusian leader, Western policy will not completely repulse him

- the political scientist believes.

According to Oreshkin, both the EU and the Kremlin will flirt with Lukashenka. Keeping Batka is convenient for Western elites - for example, Babaryko could fall under the influence of Russia much faster. There are no strong pro-Western Belarusian politicians on the horizon.

Moscow needs him too - Putin is not interested in the victory of a candidate oriented towards the West. Russia has oil, gas and money, but Belarus does not - the Russian Federation will continue to use its resources for political purposes.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Observer2014

-1

19 August 2020 18: 43

Political scientist: By pushing Lukashenka away, Europe will get Russian Iskander in Brest and Grodno

I don't understand how, who broadcasts this. You can call a political scientist !? Yes, the missiles are even closer to targets in Europe than from Brest and Grodno. Hello! Kaliningrad region. He sends fiery radioactive greetings to everyone.
1. King3214
  
  -6
  
  19 August 2020 19: 08
  
  It is necessary to somehow explain the billions spent on the Russian budget, for no one needs (except China), Belarus.
  1. Observer2014
    
    -2
    
    19 August 2020 19: 12
    
    Quote: King3214
    It is necessary to somehow explain the billions spent on the Russian budget, for no one needs (except China), Belarus.
    
    Why not? Then it turns out, am I right?
    
    Observer2014 Yesterday, 21:47 -1
    
    Bulgaria will build the "Balkan Stream" with Russian money
    
    The independence of Ukraine and Belarus was built on Russian money. This is why the West resists our flows. All these years there has been financing of these regions. At the expense of Russia.
    You can, of course, hear a marginal howl about fraternal relations. But the truth is always the same.
    1. King3214
      
      +3
      
      19 August 2020 19: 57
      
      So it was in terms of "feeding" that Maidan 2014 took place in Ukraine.
      They did not want to "feed" from Russia, which, for a minute, provided Ukraine with subsidies, benefits and preferences for more than $ 300.000.000.000 and decided that the ration from the West would be more satisfying.
      And how is it now?
      For some reason, over the past 6 years, I have not seen the cracked Ukrainian faces fed by the West.
      The Belarusians are bred in exactly the same way.
      The Ukrainians are especially trying. And then it's a shame to them, because it turns out that "Ukrainian" and "goof" are synonyms. They are trying to pull the Belarusians on the same rake, so that from the outside it would seem "normal".
      1. Olegek
        
        -1
        
        20 August 2020 09: 23
        
        So it was in terms of "feeding" that Maidan 2014 took place in Ukraine.
        They did not want to "feed" from Russia, which, for a minute, provided Ukraine with subsidies, benefits and preferences for more than $ 300.000.000.000 and decided that the ration from the West would be more satisfying.
        
        News about Belarus. Learn geography.
Kuzmich Sibiryakov

+2

19 August 2020 19: 44

Only one like this crackpiper can deploy tactical weapons near the NATO border. The range of these beaters is sufficient to be placed in the factory yard, where they are finally assembled.
Sergey Latyshev

-3

19 August 2020 20: 27

Wah, what a political scientist! And not plump like the rest!
The day before yesterday the European Union declared it non-granny, and today -

The EU will not alienate the winning president.

Where are they found?
1. Olegek
  
  0
  
  20 August 2020 09: 26
  
  the day before yesterday the European Union declared it non grata, and today -
  
  He was not recognized in Europe and the United States. And Ukraine (!) Did not recognize it. And she recalled the ambassador.
greenchelman

+2

20 August 2020 01: 40

Fierce trash. However, I'm not surprised. Oreshkin is a political geographer, candidate of geographical sciences. What does he have to do with the army? NO ISKANDERS IN BELARUS! Guys, you are tying up frank degenerates to quote who spoke at Bolotnaya ...
g1washntwn

+3

20 August 2020 06: 18

Wah, what juicy terms have flooded from individual citizens: "missiles at the borders", "dictate to Europe", "bloody regime" ...
Are they worried that Ms. Clinton hasn't had fun for a long time after Gaddafi was torn apart?
Olegek

0

20 August 2020 09: 22

The European Union fears that Belarus will be finally drawn into the orbit of Russia's interests, so the EU will not alienate the president, Alexander Lukashenko, who won the election.

It will not.
25 years of rule by "Russia's best friend" was not enough for this, Lukashenko did not help Russia in any way. It is naive enough to expect that he will do something in a crumbling state.

Lukashenka's Belarus is useless for Russia and even dangerous because of its instability.
Olegek

+1

20 August 2020 09: 28

According to Oreshkin, both the EU and the Kremlin will flirt with Lukashenka. Saving Old Man ..

Excuse me, who is he "dad"? Lukashenka is a toxic asset for Belarusians, Europeans and Russians. For all. Only the Chinese love him. For money.