Rockefellers under cover of a pandemic: what the real masters of America have in mind


World wide coronavirus pandemic the economy, was for some not so unexpected. Some time ago, many remembered how, 10 years ago, the Rockefeller Foundation published a noteworthy report entitled “Scenarios of the Future of technologies and international development. ” Six months ago, it would have been read as a fantastic novel with a famously twisted plot, but today it is no longer a joke.


Too much of this forecast came true, which inevitably raises questions for its compilers. If you carefully read the report, then if you want between the lines you can see the prediction of a possible coup in the United States and even a revolution in Russia. What gives reason to say so?

First of all, you need to consider what kind of structure it is and who its creator is. John Rockefeller is the first dollar billionaire in history, despite Forbes ratings, it is his family that is today considered the richest in the world. The US Federal Reserve, this private money press, is owned by the Rockefeller family and other super-oligarchs, such as the Morgans, Warburgs, Rothschilds and others. This gives rise to many conspiracy theorists consider them not only the creators of the globalism system, but also the backstage world government.

The Rockefeller Foundation's officially declared goals are the search for “promising ideas that can bring change to the lives of a large number of poor and vulnerable groups.” The beginning, it seems, is commendable, but it sounds somewhat ominous against the background of the predictions of this organization, because no one directly promised that people would like these changes. A 10-year-old report focuses on scenarios for the development of the goose flu pandemic. We will make a reservation that it has not yet been proven that the coronavirus is of artificial origin, but if you look through the prism of today's events, then COVID-19 if it is not a biological weapon, then in fact it is “economic” and “political».

Initially appearing in China, coronavirus caused damage to the main competitor of the United States, comparable to the results of a large regional war. Celestial China has lost about 10% of its economy, possibly irrevocably. Now, all the prerequisites have been objectively created for the gradual withdrawal of production from the PRC back to Western countries.

If you look at events in the US, the pandemic turned out to be the real "Trump killer." Within a few months, the coronavirus nullified the previous economic achievements of the presidential candidate, who six months ago was confidently heading for victory in the November elections. The murder by the police of black George Floyd led to riot and mass riots, in which many unemployed Americans took part. According to recent CNN polls, Democrat Joe Biden is now supported by 55% of potential voters, Republican Trump - 41%. It is worth recalling that the US Democratic Party is considered the political pillar of the very “globalists” behind whom the American financial super-oligarchy stands, with which we began our story.

In fact, COVID-19 killed two birds with one stone at once: the ambitions of China and the “imperial” project of Trump, who is trying to restore the status of a nation state to the United States, removing it from the secret guardianship of their real owners. Also, in the report of the Fund you can see hints of possible revolutionary events in other countries, for example, Russia. Its compilers calculated that our authorities, knowing the mentality of the people, will try to use a pandemic to strengthen their own power:

Citizens willingly gave up part of their sovereignty and the right to privacy to become more paternalistic states in exchange for greater security and stability for themselves. Moreover, citizens turned out to be more tolerant and even impatient in terms of strengthening control and supervision, and national leaders had more opportunities to put things in order by the methods and the way they considered it necessary.

What is the “self-isolation” regime set up in Moscow, which was later voluntarily canceled for the sake of voting for amendments to the Constitution, the “spyware” application “Social Monitoring” and the mode of access to the street using a QR code? But such pressure and infiltration of people “under the skin” cannot continue indefinitely, as the authors of the report pointed out 10 years ago:

By 2025, people seemed to be tired of such powerful control from above and the fact that they allowed leaders and authorities to make choices for them. Everywhere where national interests clashed with the interests of individual citizens, conflicts began to arise. At first, a single rebuff to pressure from above became more organized and coordinated, because discontented youth and people who saw how their social status and opportunities eluded them (this applied mainly to developing countries) themselves provoked civil unrest.

The year 2025 is with us just after the end of the next term of President Putin’s reign, which he is trying to extend either through “zeroing” or through the Council of State. In general, a curious reading happened.
Photos used: https://needpix.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

45 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. aquarius580 Offline
    aquarius580 11 June 2020 13: 43
    +1
    • 4
    • 3
    Actually, Trump is a Rockefeller man. The logic in this article does not converge.
    1. Kristallovich Online
      Kristallovich (Ruslan) 11 June 2020 14: 14
      +1
      • 4
      • 3
      Trump is actually a Rockefeller man

      What is your evidence?
    2. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 11 June 2020 22: 42
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      And who is Trump's son-in-law? What does the Rockefeller have to do with it.
    3. SDX07G5 Offline
      SDX07G5 (SDX07G5) 12 June 2020 12: 12
      +2
      • 3
      • 1
      Trump is just a crisis manager at the US Corporation and put him in this place with meaning. He must fill up the system in order to nullify unpaid debts (it is no secret that unpaid debts are paid with worthless money). Next, a new system will be organized under the same sauce of private Central Banks.
  2. Alfiya Galimova Offline
    Alfiya Galimova (Alfiya Galimova) 11 June 2020 16: 49
    +5
    • 11
    • 6
    You, the Author, do not like Putin’s power, and whose power was and is better? .... Or are you looking for anarchy? Without power in general - there will be chaos and chaos of crime. ... Vladimir Putin is a worthy power, which is why the people chose him again. If he had more opportunities, I’m sure that everything would be even better in Russia, but liberal masons like you constantly “put sticks in the wheels” ..... When will you find control? ....
    1. Perfectionist Offline
      Perfectionist 11 June 2020 17: 52
      +4
      • 10
      • 6
      Power is not a woman to like. Whose Putin is he? You know? What are his goals? His whole country begged not to sign a penny increase. age, are you treated with understanding? Worthy people of Russia asked not to approve the law on state. population register, signed, and added to create a genetic fund. You will be controlled not only by face, passport, bank account, but also by DNA.
      1. 123 Online
        123 (123) 11 June 2020 18: 37
        +2
        • 8
        • 6
        Worthy people of Russia asked not to approve the law on state. population register, signed, and added to create a genetic fund. You will be controlled not only by face, passport, bank account, but also by DNA.

        I have two questions:
        1. Who are these "worthy people of Russia"Do they have surnames?
        2. I heard about this law for the first time, found, read, found nothing terrible in it. What is the essence of the claims and what kind of genetic fund are we talking about? The law did not find a word about it. request

        http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=354474&fld=134&dst
        1. Marzhecki Offline
          Marzhecki (Sergei) 12 June 2020 06: 23
          -2
          • 4
          • 6
          Quote: 123
          I have two questions:
          1. Who are these "worthy people of Russia"? Do they have surnames?

          Is it that your come for them?
          1. 123 Online
            123 (123) 12 June 2020 20: 05
            +3
            • 4
            • 1
            Is it that your come for them?

            Orderlies are not ours. request What kind of "worthy people" are these, whose names are embarrassed to name? Announce the list of "honorary lawyers". Notice what the genetic fund has to do with it, no one has explained. request Maybe you come down? lol
      2. olpin51 Online
        olpin51 (Oleg Pinegin) 11 June 2020 19: 09
        +2
        • 7
        • 5
        Dear Perfectionist. And you specifically suggest who to put in return. It is very interesting to look at such a candidate.
        1. Marzhecki Offline
          Marzhecki (Sergei) 12 June 2020 07: 08
          -3
          • 3
          • 6
          In its place, you can put someone pleasing, corresponding to the electoral qualification. It will not be worse.
          1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
            Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 12 June 2020 09: 03
            +6
            • 8
            • 2
            Quote: Marzhetsky
            ANYONE

            For example, Bulk. Who loves overseas grants and does not like to pay subordinates a salary. Or Ksyusha Sobchak, who will give the Kuril Islands, Crimea, the Caucasus, and American troops to Moscow for fashionable lipstick. All over the world they will be praised. And the Russians will die, in front of the happy Europeans. At 100 thousand per year, in excess of natural mortality, as under Yeltsin. After all, Bush killed 3 million Iraqis in Iraq, defending his interests in the robbery. Why are Russians sitting on such riches better?
            1. 321 Offline
              321 (321) 12 June 2020 11: 57
              0
              • 2
              • 2
              And without already hackneyed stamps in no way?
              Those whom you brought here cannot really gather rallies, but something more - this is already something else ...
              And about mortality - it’s different now, after the “optimization” of medicine, education and further on the list.
          2. 123 Online
            123 (123) 12 June 2020 20: 07
            +2
            • 3
            • 1
            They write here that agriculture is about to robotize, I hope that progress will come to journalism. It will not be worse. hi
        2. Perfectionist Offline
          Perfectionist 12 June 2020 16: 04
          +2
          • 4
          • 2
          There are many wise people in Russia, including famous ones. The trouble is that decent people do not agree to go into power, this glade is for bastards.
          1. 123 Online
            123 (123) 12 June 2020 20: 09
            +4
            • 5
            • 1
            There are many wise people in Russia, including famous ones. The trouble is that decent people do not agree to go into power, this glade is for bastards.

            Who are these mysterious "famous and decent" people? Give at least one last name, who will not be persuaded to go into power?
            1. The comment was deleted.
      3. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
        Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 12 June 2020 08: 58
        +5
        • 7
        • 2
        Quote: Perfectionist
        Whose Putin is he? You know?

        And if - nobody? By itself?
        That’s why there was a howl in the PRIVATE MEDIA that drove the dogs to Putin, because of the inability to calmly and comfortably rob the world. After all, media brands all over the world belong to 7 (seven) people. And the views of these seven determine the direction of world propaganda. Any deviation from the views of the OWNER is to the journalist, the editor of the career. And the way Putin is being bullied, amid the silence of American death camps around the world, and the sheep’s submissiveness to European leaders of the Euro-Indians, talks about Putin’s complete freedom of action both from the propagandons of Murdoch and Turner, and from the financial and political tycoons of the Irish mafia.
        1. 321 Offline
          321 (321) 12 June 2020 12: 00
          +1
          • 3
          • 2
          Now I’m not much interested in even Murdoch, even Turners - my country is much more interested in it, and here the most interesting part begins - who finances the Echo of Moscow? Prompt, or do you know?
        2. Perfectionist Offline
          Perfectionist 12 June 2020 16: 21
          0
          • 4
          • 4
          So far, Putin has been robbing Russia, taking tens of billions abroad. If Putin is free, what prevents him from curbing the Central Bank, because he did not propose to nationalize the Central Bank in amendments to the Constitution? If he has power, why did the money allocated to support the business during the period of self-isolation be given to the banks that these banks successfully scrolled through the exchange? And by the way, yes, you were asked who finances the Echo of Moscow? Gazprom, one of Putin's pillars. So whose is he, Putin?
          1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
            Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 12 June 2020 18: 45
            +3
            • 3
            • 0
            Quote: Perfectionist
            And by the way, yes, you were asked who finances the Echo of Moscow? Gazprom, one of Putin's pillars. So whose is he, Putin?

            Who told you that Gazprom and Putin are united? Putin came to the premiere as a man of Berezovsky. And at the same time - a friend of Chubais. Chubais and Putin were the deputies of Sobchak.
            See the structure? It was called Family. In the Family, Putin did not betray anyone, not even Berezovsky. Sent to London, but not gutted.
            Gradually, his family associates became extinct, but Putin remained. Now nobody but Chubais limits it. But Chubais is on an official cat, and although he looks into Davos, he has no special interests abroad.
            As for subsidies for businesses given to banks, Duc is still a Soviet tradition. Agricultural subsidies ALWAYS were given to banks, not to peasants. All 30 years of post-Soviet Russia.
            1. 321 Offline
              321 (321) 12 June 2020 19: 22
              +1
              • 2
              • 1
              After your answer about Chubais, it’s NOT interesting any further - he said that he brought it? Only now the GDP itself spoke quite differently about this, albeit quite a while ago ...
              Not to mention the fact that over the years elsewhere, but you could put your own person in Gazprom.
              1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
                Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 13 June 2020 19: 35
                +1
                • 2
                • 1
                Quote: 321
                After your answer about Chubais, then it’s already NOT interesting

                How old are you, and where were you in 1994?
                Chubais - head of the privatization committee, deputy prime minister - but it was he who decided who and how to hand over the state. enterprises, oil, gas, fishing fleet. Then, with the humble manager of RAO EU, all appointments in the Kremlin were agreed.
                The appointment of Putin as prime minister, except for Chubais, was agreed with Schroeder and Clinton. And only with the consent of all three did Putin become prime minister.
                Now Chubais is the head of RosNano, with an income of 1 billion rubles a year. Schroeder - Chairman of Rosneft, with a slightly lower salary.
                1. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) 13 June 2020 21: 42
                  +1
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  Quote: Oyo Sarkazmi
                  ... Then, with the modest manager of RAO EU, all appointments in the Kremlin were agreed.
                  The appointment of Putin as prime minister, except for Chubais, was agreed with Schroeder and Clinton. And only with the consent of all three Putin became the prime minister ....

                  Who cares how old I am? I’ll write briefly, more than fifty, but the fact that you still blindly believe almost everything that the media wrote and are writing already says a lot ...
                  As for the coordination of ALL appointments - well, believe in this further, I have a different opinion. hi
                  1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
                    Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 13 June 2020 22: 09
                    +1
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    Another opinion - Putin is controlled by those to whom he does not owe anything? And he climbs out of his way to end his life in Guantanamo?
                    1. 321 Offline
                      321 (321) 13 June 2020 22: 56
                      +1
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      Quote: Oyo Sarkazmi
                      Another opinion - Putin is controlled by those to whom he does not owe anything? And he climbs out of his way to end his life in Guantanamo?

                      Are you waiting for me to start commenting on your thoughts? I don’t care ...
                      PS As opuses about Chubais’s omnipotence and omnipotence are already tired. bully
          2. olpin51 Online
            olpin51 (Oleg Pinegin) 28 June 2020 06: 49
            0
            • 0
            • 0
            But how many opportunities does Putin have. He is not a king, as many, many "conscious" think. Everyone knows, I think, how many of his messages are blocked. But! God's mill grinds slowly but surely.
    2. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 11 June 2020 22: 44
      -5
      • 0
      • 5
      Tsarist power is much better.
    3. Marzhecki Offline
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 12 June 2020 06: 28
      0
      • 3
      • 3
      Alfia, I am not a liberal, but a person opposed to socialist views. The liberal is just Vladimir Putin. Do not believe it, here is a quote from his spokesman Peskov:

      Russian President Vladimir Putin is an absolute liberal by nature, not a conservative, said presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov.
      “You know, enemies - primarily abroad, but also some enemies within Russia - believe that Putin is more likely a conservative and such a statesman who is alien to the word“ freedom. ”But Putin is an absolute liberal by nature, and a much larger liberal rather than called liberals who call themselves “the opposition,” Peskov said in an interview with the Mir television channel, saying the president is “absolutely liberal in his economic approaches, social policy, and so on.

      Quote from the Russian newspaper, the official source of power.

      https://rg.ru/2016/12/21/peskov-putin-gorazdo-bolshij-liberal-nezheli-nazyvnye-liberaly.html

      PS I, according to my beliefs, have never voted for him and do not intend to.
      PPS If someone puts sticks in the wheels to him, then this is his own incompetent environment, drawn up by him on the basis of personal devotion to him.
      PPPS Edit, like Putin, can absolutely any Russian citizen who has reached the age of 35.
    4. 321 Offline
      321 (321) 12 June 2020 11: 51
      +1
      • 3
      • 2
      Quote: Alfiya Galimova
      ... Or are you looking for anarchy? Without power in general - there will be chaos and chaos of crime. ...

      Do not tell me where, even in the article, even in the comments about this option is written?

      Quote: Alfiya Galimova
      ... If he had more opportunities - I am sure that in Russia everything would be even better ...

      What other opportunities are needed and how many years will it take to turn to YOUR citizens, and not to some other ones?

      Quote: Alfiya Galimova
      ... but liberal masons like you constantly “put sticks in the wheels” ...

      It turns out that the Masons forced the pension “reform” to be adopted, and for all TV boxes they made herds of pensioners or pre-pensioners, as it were, skip - oh, how do we want to work even before ..., yes?

      Quote: Alfiya Galimova
      ... When will you find control? ....

      Personally, what version of “council” do you like more - flogging, hanging, shooting for going out without permission, clipping limbs - personally, what do you like more for those who DO NOT agree with your opinion and just write about it - without taking any practical steps and especially illegal actions ???
      While not undertaking ...
  3. Elena Ushkova Offline
    Elena Ushkova (Elena Ushkova) 11 June 2020 16: 51
    +1
    • 5
    • 4
    Again the same message - Putin, wow!
    1. Marzhecki Offline
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 12 June 2020 06: 24
      -1
      • 5
      • 6
      According to the Basic Law, he, as a "lawyer" by education and an officer, had to leave after the first two terms.
      1. 123 Online
        123 (123) 13 June 2020 14: 16
        +2
        • 2
        • 0
        According to the Basic Law, he, as a "lawyer" by education and an officer, had to leave after the first two terms.

        You will probably be surprised, but he did leave after two terms. According to the "Basic Law" there are no obstacles to nomination for a third term. Or do you have another "Basic Law"?
        PS It's a pity you are not an officer, not even a non-commissioned officer, but simply a "lawyer".
  4. 123 Online
    123 (123) 11 June 2020 17: 17
    +2
    • 8
    • 6
    What is the “self-isolation” regime set up in Moscow, which was later voluntarily canceled for the sake of voting for amendments to the Constitution, the “spyware” application “Social Monitoring” and the mode of access to the street using a QR code? But such pressure and infiltration of people “under the skin” cannot continue indefinitely, as the authors of the report pointed out 10 years ago:

    Voluntarism is the desire to realize the desired goals without taking into account objective circumstances and possible consequences.

    Why do you think that the regime of "self-isolation" is canceled without taking into account the real situation and possible consequences - a mystery. Or did you just scream another screech, and there even though the grass doesn’t grow?
    We already talked about the “spyware” application “Social Monitoring”, if the memory is “girlish”, re-read it again under the article:

    Undercover experiment: how authorities want to keep track of Russians

    In two months, new data appeared?

    But endlessly, such pressure and penetration of people “under the skin” cannot continue, as the authors of the report pointed out 10 years ago

    Please do not generalize and do not speak out for everyone. If someone gets under your skin, then this is your personal problem.
    What the Rockefeller Foundation predicts for others in 2025 happens to them right now, the professionalism of the authors of the report is at least questionable.
    1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
      Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 12 June 2020 09: 11
      +1
      • 4
      • 3
      Quote: 123
      If someone gets under your skin, then this is your personal problem.

      In fact, he is not a Russian at all. System Man (there is such a division of Internet propaganda in the USA). And quite possibly, Marzhetsky is just a nickname on duty, for which different people work. Or a group of people.
      1. Netyn Offline
        Netyn (Netyn) 12 June 2020 14: 41
        +2
        • 3
        • 1
        Well, he lies and juggles regularly, but rather clumsily.
      2. 123 Online
        123 (123) 12 June 2020 20: 12
        +2
        • 3
        • 1
        In fact, he is not a Russian at all. System Man (there is such a division of Internet propaganda in the USA). And quite possibly, Marzhetsky is just a nickname on duty, for which different people work. Or a group of people.

        The USA doesn't smell here no maximum Ukraine. And rather, one person under several nicknames. hi
        1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
          Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 13 June 2020 19: 39
          +2
          • 2
          • 0
          Quote: 123
          The USA doesn't smell here

          No, the United States definitely. Judging by the style, in different sections there are different people with different levels of Russian language proficiency. Ukrainians are much more Russian. bully
  5. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 12 June 2020 04: 13
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    That's who it's time to dispossess. Different Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Morgan, etc. etc., which are legion. They do not know what to spend their liards on, inefficiently.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. kartalovkolya Offline
    kartalovkolya 12 June 2020 06: 46
    0
    • 4
    • 4
    Again, liberal howls and dances to the anti-Russian tambourines! Well, how tired of the liberal swamp and from what hangover are we all obliged to comply with the rules invented and imposed on the whole world by the main robbers of the US world ??? The question of the succession of powers was imposed on Russia at the end of the 19th, at the beginning of the 20th century by Anglo-Saxon parasites, and it was not their lackeys to teach us who to choose and how many times! We are Russia-Russia, and they are our eternal enemies! Lived and will live the way our ancestors lived! And in the light of what is happening, their fear of a popular vote on July 1 becomes clear! All as one we give our votes for OUR FUTURE !!!
    1. Marzhecki Offline
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 12 June 2020 07: 05
      -1
      • 2
      • 3
      Once again: Russia's main liberal is Vladimir Putin, according to a statement by his spokesman Peskov.

      Russian President Vladimir Putin is an absolute liberal by nature, not a conservative, said presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov.

      https://rg.ru/2016/12/21/peskov-putin-gorazdo-bolshij-liberal-nezheli-nazyvnye-liberaly.html

      In your head, as I understand it, these things do not add up?
  8. Egor 7b7 Offline
    Egor 7b7 12 June 2020 08: 56
    0
    • 3
    • 3
    Quote: kartalovkolya
    Again, liberal howls and dances to the anti-Russian tambourines! Well, how tired of the liberal swamp and from what hangover are we all obliged to comply with the rules invented and imposed on the whole world by the main robbers of the US world ??? ...

    Lord Jesus! How naive you are. Putin and his so-called "government" are only concerned with fulfilling the rules invented and imposed by their overseas owners. "Pension reform" is one of hundreds of proofs of this. And who controls the "Central Bank"? And who does Sberbank own, do not know, no?
  9. T. Henks Offline
    T. Henks (Igor) 12 June 2020 09: 45
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Morning workout after tea. Whose will you be is an eternal question. Isn’t it better to be a normal person in life?
  10. SDX07G5 Offline
    SDX07G5 (SDX07G5) 12 June 2020 11: 47
    +4
    • 4
    • 0
    The author does not quite understand what he is writing about. The assertion that the Rockefellers are the mutual owners of the Fed is absolutely incorrect. This private corporation (Fed) has completely different owners and operates on a completely different structure. You need to know the story before drawing such ridiculous conclusions. First of all, there is a system of private securities, which has its own governing body, this is the Bank for International Settlements and Agreements. It is enough to go to the website of this (private) bank in order to make sure that all private securities (and this is the Fed, the ECB, the Bank of England, the Bank of Russia, the Bank of Japan, etc., etc.) in it run and it is he who gives them directions. Recall also that the Fed was created according to the model of the Bank of England and in order to understand where it came from and to whom it belongs, you need to dig the history of the Roman Empire. Initially, the system consisted of Temples, in which believers carried their values, for the preservation of which the priest was responsible. The temples were different and after the coup in Etruscan Rome, the Temple of Saturn became the main one, this is a cult that was practiced by those who captured Rome. It was from the Temple of Saturn that the Bank of Rome grew (stolen), the regional branches of which were the Bank of England, all private Central Banks in Europe, and so on. In the middle of the 16th century, the Bank of Rome was given to the Pope by the Jesuits, who promoted the methodology of the Bank of Rome to all its regional branches (in particular, the Fed is a continuation of the Bank of England). Today, the whole system belongs to the Vatican, which considers itself the owner of the world, and it’s quite natural that each private Central Bank has its own attendants (Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgan, Warburgs, and so on, it's just banking families, nothing more, and governments under these private banks are colonial, this is more than obvious). This story is very old and many cannot understand it precisely because of a lack of knowledge, which is not easy to find, but you can if you wish :)
    1. Jack clubs Offline
      Jack clubs (Eugene) 15 June 2020 14: 44
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Quote: SDX07G5
      to understand where it came from and to whom it belongs, you need to dig the history of the Roman Empire

      Very interesting information. Please share sources, especially about the finances of the Ancient World.
      And by the way, since the Fed has its roots in the Vatican, it turns out that the Pope is his beneficiary? No?
  11. shinobi Offline
    shinobi (Yuri) 13 June 2020 01: 26
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    This kind of "forecasts" come out every 5-7 years. How, in fact, epidemics come with the same frequency. Nothing new and nothing has changed. So what? But nothing. We survived the 90s, and we will survive it. And we’ll spit on the graves of those who bury us and our country.