NI: Russia hinted at the destruction of the F-35 if it appears in the sky above the country


Russia hinted to the US that it would destroy F-35 fighters if they appeared in their skies, reports The National Interest.


Recently, an official representative of the Russian Embassy in the United States wrote a message on his Twitter account that was surprising even by the standards of the Cold War. It resembles the propaganda saber-rattling of the Vietnam War.

If this is Russia ... and someday we'll see the F-35 inside our airspace, we would like to send a signal to the chief of staff of @usairforce, General David L. Goldfein in a nutshell - remember Vietnam. F-35 will never be alone

- Tweets NI.

NI: Russia hinted at the destruction of the F-35 if it appears in the sky above the country

This Twitter post on the Russian Embassy in the United States was a response to a lecture given by Air Force Chief of Staff General David Goldfein at the Brookings Institution.

If China, Russia or another enemy on the globe ever saw an F-35 in its airspace, I would love to send them all a two-word message - we are here

- said the general, assessing the capabilities of the F-35.

It's not "I'm here" - the F-35 will never be alone

- he added.

The general emphasized that the F-35 exceeded "all expectations when it comes to its survivability."

However, the reaction of the Russians is based on the fact that their air defense is able to detect the “invisible” F-35 and destroy it.

Previously, the Kremlin simply ignored messages from the West that related to Russian weapons, and now Russian officials are increasingly publicly responding to media calls.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

32 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 2 May 2020 15: 09
    -5
    • 5
    • 10
    Some stupidity, and what exactly is the F-35? Why are these "hints"? Not on May 1, they were drinking, maybe? Any intruder in the sky of any country must be destroyed.
    1. Syoma_67 Offline
      Syoma_67 (Semyon) 3 May 2020 20: 19
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      The Turks have already proven this in practice.
  2. beeper Offline
    beeper 2 May 2020 15: 15
    +5
    • 7
    • 2
    Well, the same general stupid "Kilroy was here" whistles in the head, whistles, doesn’t live this arrogant Yankee calmly ?! winked
  3. 123 Offline
    123 (123) 2 May 2020 16: 11
    +2
    • 5
    • 3
    Recently, an official representative of the Russian Embassy in the United States wrote a message on his Twitter account that was surprising even by the standards of the Cold War.

    What is the name of this worthy person?
  4. Serge Tixiy Offline
    Serge Tixiy (Serge Tixiy) 2 May 2020 16: 20
    +5
    • 7
    • 2
    For me, this is how the Americans created the myth about its perfection around the F-35 and now they believe in it themselves.
    1. Dear sofa expert. 4 May 2020 00: 08
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Ordinary marketing. Selling somehow you need this misunderstanding.
  5. aleksandrmakedo Offline
    aleksandrmakedo (Dubovitsky Victor Kuzmich) 2 May 2020 16: 46
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Quote: Arkharov
    Some stupidity, what does the F-35 have to do with it? Why are these "hints"? Not on May 1, they were drinking, maybe? Any intruder in the sky of any country must be destroyed.

    Write it to the completely insolent penguin. Or does he think that what is allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to the bull? Let him try to turn into Europe. And he will experience for himself whether it is allowed or not.
  6. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 2 May 2020 20: 14
    -2
    • 2
    • 4
    Uh ... A joke of incompetence of all described? One offers to slap someone else's fighter? Another invites Stealth to fool from scratch?
  7. NordUral Offline
    NordUral (Eugene) 2 May 2020 22: 20
    +4
    • 4
    • 0
    I read some generals' nonsense.
  8. Dust Offline
    Dust (Sergei) 3 May 2020 14: 25
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    He dreams of the appearance of the F-35 in the sky of Russia, and I dream of the appearance of Sarmat in the sky over Washington ... So, let him keep his dreams to himself!)
  9. rotkiv04 Offline
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 3 May 2020 14: 35
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    If so, if they try to appear, there will be a sample for study, and the pilot will be exchanged for Bout.
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 May 2020 17: 34
      -4
      • 0
      • 4
      Why do you need Booth?
      1. rotkiv04 Offline
        rotkiv04 (Victor) 3 May 2020 19: 13
        0
        • 1
        • 1
        And you yourself do not understand? Or are you inadequate?
        1. Arkharov Offline
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 May 2020 22: 55
          -2
          • 0
          • 2
          No, it’s not clear. Do you want to pick up all the criminals from America?
  10. sgrabik Offline
    sgrabik (Sergei) 3 May 2020 16: 00
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    They found something to scare us with. These F-35 buckets still somehow fly at subsonic speed, and at the supersonic tail they are damaged and the special coating quickly becomes worthless. As a result, the aircraft loses its "invisibility" by several orders of magnitude and becomes an excellent target for our Su-35s at a distance of up to 250 - 280 km.
  11. Umsan Umsanov Offline
    Umsan Umsanov (Umsan Umsanov) 3 May 2020 16: 37
    -2
    • 0
    • 2
    F-35s work in conjunction with F-22 using drones and tomahawks. Of course, they can penetrate the defense somewhere. But several of them will be shot down.
    We’ll hold the first wave.
    Instead of Armata tanks, they would have made another S-400 + Buki + Torah.
    Here is my wish.
    1. Dear sofa expert. 4 May 2020 01: 09
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      ..F-35 works in conjunction with F-22 using drones and tomahawks.

      It’s time to call Chingachguk, to smoke a pipe of the world).
  12. Barmaley_2 Offline
    Barmaley_2 (Barmaley) 3 May 2020 19: 53
    -2
    • 1
    • 3
    Israeli F-35s are successfully used in Syria and they wanted to spit on the S-300 and 400, etc. there. At long ranges, they are not detected, and, of course, they will not enter the near one.
    1. alexneg13 Offline
      alexneg13 (Alexander) 3 May 2020 20: 48
      +3
      • 5
      • 2
      These F-35s shoot at Syria from someone else’s territory and are afraid to pop into Syria. They know that they are clearly detected and accompanied by all-angle radars (this is a combination of meter, decimeter and centimeter waves). And stink the whole world about this under-super-waffle.
      1. Barmaley_2 Offline
        Barmaley_2 (Barmaley) 4 May 2020 00: 00
        -3
        • 0
        • 3
        I will greatly disappoint you. Jews shoot from a range of only 100-110 km, which is not such a prohibitive range even for conventional S-300PMU1 missiles (pr. In 1993) with 5V55U, 48N6E2, 48N6E shoot at 150 km or more, and 36D6 radar can also be used to provide a set of data for early detection of targets and can detect targets such as a rocket (with a very small ERP) at a high altitude of up to 175 km (for firing at maximum ranges of 110 km when leaving the suspension at an altitude of about 10 km, missile launcher type GBU-39, which Israel uses, has to rise higher). And, given the difficult mountainous terrain of that TVD, the Russian Aerospace Forces use there also an AWACS aircraft and the A-50 along with the Su-35. But this does not change the situation. In addition, the Persians separately brought to Syria their type "steeper than the original, that is, the S-300" Bavar-373, which are also liquid ..... And even worse. The Persians placed them generally directly near their facilities and, in theory, they should have brought down at least something. But figs there they guessed. They were able to copy very successfully the American high-tech UAV at the time (respect for them), but they could not copy normally enough the ancient S-300PM. As a result, we got a very ugly picture: at long ranges the S-300/400 and its type 35D6 (ST-68UM) radar still do not see the F-35, and Israeli missiles flying at extremely low altitudes are already detected at a distance of 20-30 km and bring down air defense systems of small and medium range. And also not all and not always. Well, or as a version of consolation for cheers, I can assume that the great GDP agreed with the Jews that the S-300/400 will not work on Israeli aircraft that did not enter Syrian airspace. But this is some kind of strange agreement: I will not fight with you, but I will kick you from afar. The result is the same - we dig out the lyuley ..
        1. Dear sofa expert. 4 May 2020 00: 21
          +1
          • 1
          • 0
          I will greatly disappoint you. Jews shoot from a range of only 100-110 km, which is not such a prohibitive range ...

          It feels like you're a specialist in Jewish air-to-surface missiles. Tell us (fools), please, the range of the Rocks missile. We will be very grateful.
          1. Barmaley_2 Offline
            Barmaley_2 (Barmaley) 4 May 2020 00: 29
            -3
            • 0
            • 3
            I haven’t recorded anyone here as fools yet (I don’t remember, sir, anyway). This is a time. I’m not a specialist in Jewish missiles. This is the second. Thirdly, I wrote about GBU-39 because it was precisely the fragments and remnants of this system that were repeatedly found. And so, the topic for it is relevant. And fourth, the Rocks missile range is long.
            1. Dear sofa expert. 4 May 2020 00: 37
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              ... I’m not a specialist in Jewish missiles ..

              Well, you wrote so much and cleverly that you got the impression).

              ... Jews shoot from a range of only 100-110 km, which is not such a prohibitive range ..

              and...

              ... the flight range of the Rocks rocket is large ..

              - Together somehow poorly linked. Decide, please).

              ... wrote about GBU-39 because it was the fragments and remnants of this system that were repeatedly found ..

              Who were discovered? The Israelis? )))

              ... so far I haven’t written anyone down here ..

              It was a joke, forget the fools. They are not here. And so forget your flimsy argument. Sorry.
              1. Barmaley_2 Offline
                Barmaley_2 (Barmaley) 4 May 2020 00: 51
                -3
                • 0
                • 3
                Mr. couch wise guy, with the type of "convincing argument!" Firstly, I recommend to get acquainted with at least this -

                https://topwar.ru/156416-hroniki-blizhnego-vostoka-izrail-bombit-tramp-mirit.html

                - where there is also about who and what was discovered in Syria. And secondly, it’s more likely that the demagogy you have involved is not linked to questions about the Rocks range. Although I answered this question neither to the village, nor to the city about the range of it. Or the word "big" is not an adjective and does not answer the question "what", eh? When you learn to essentially and specifically ask questions, then you will receive specific answers. But in essence there are no questions. So what an adios!
                1. Dear sofa expert. 4 May 2020 00: 56
                  +1
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  Oh, where did you go, comrade barmaley).

                  .. And secondly, the demagogy that you embroiled with questions about the Rocks range does not fit ...

                  - and .. is this your statement ?:

                  .. I will greatly disappoint you. Jews shoot from a range of only 100-110 km, which is not such a prohibitive range, even for conventional missiles.

                  Yes, you're lying, and do not blush, my friend)
                  I don’t care what you write to me personally. It is important for me that others will read about you)
                2. Dear sofa expert. 4 May 2020 01: 00
                  -1
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  .. so far I haven’t written anyone down here (I don’t remember, anyway) ..

                  and yours:

                  .. Mr. couch wise guy, with the type of "convincing argument!" ..

                  Once again, contradict yourself. You wouldn’t be so nervous at night, otherwise you’ll get a “myocardial infarction - such a scar” by chance).
                  Express your thoughts carefully from your (spinal) brain. And the people will reach for you)
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                3. The comment was deleted.
                4. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                5. The comment was deleted.
                6. The comment was deleted.
                7. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. The comment was deleted.
  • Dear sofa expert. 4 May 2020 00: 45
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    .. Israeli F-35s are successfully used in Syria and they wanted to spit on the S-300 and 400 ..

    They wanted to give a damn, because these systems had not yet had the opportunity to prove themselves (for the reasons indicated above). The time will come - they will manifest.

    ..a in the neighbor, of course, will not enter.

    And who and what will do it there ?? Syrians? On Mig 23? Yes, I beg you, Monya, you make me brains).
    To talk about some advantages of the 5th generation F-35 aircraft against the technology of the 60s (maximum 70s) should be simply humiliating).
    1. Barmaley_2 Offline
      Barmaley_2 (Barmaley) 4 May 2020 12: 23
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      In addition to the MIG-23, the Syrians have more modern MIT-29. This is a time. Although not enough, they are also almost nothing. But there is. Further. Melee combat also includes short-range combined-arms air defense, and not just airplanes. Why fall into demagogy about -

      Talk about some advantages of the 5th generation F-35 aircraft against the technology of the 60s (maximum 70s) ...

      What does this have to do with it? Did I only write about melee between planes? WHERE did I write like that, huh? These are two.
      Thirdly. How much and what else should happen (two years there S-300. TWO YEARS!), So that these systems began to type "prove itself"? How many years of the Syrians Jews still have to bomb and how many IL-20 are needed, etc. knock down pieces?
      Fourth. What is the lie that the maximum launch speed of the GBU-39 is 110 km? In what?
      Fifth. What does the range of the Rocks rocket have to do with the issue? Links to the studio about famous facts about its use in Syria! Links!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. alexneg13 Offline
        alexneg13 (Alexander) 4 May 2020 20: 17
        +1
        • 2
        • 1
        So you strike from someone else’s territory, only scum, and also fingers with a fan, do this. For this reason, there is no return fire on planes, only on missiles crossing the border. And to bombard a wounded country on far-fetched pretexts that somewhere, something, someone said and said (it’s schizophrenia in a neglected form), which is fighting world terrorism with all its might - it’s just to be jackals.
        1. Barmaley_2 Offline
          Barmaley_2 (Barmaley) 19 May 2020 00: 38
          -1
          • 0
          • 1
          Neither I nor we (Ukraine) are doing any strikes in Syria. And who told you that war is exclusively a fair fight? Have you heard anything about military cunning?
  • The comment was deleted.
  • shinobi Offline
    shinobi (Yuri) 10 May 2020 09: 39
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Hmm, Vietnam began to forget. It's time to arrange a show. Hold the "invisible" air defense systems under the gun so that all of their sensors yell and howl. To pilots diapers was not enough. Remind who actually controls the sky.
    1. Barmaley_2 Offline
      Barmaley_2 (Barmaley) 19 May 2020 00: 39
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      The problem is that the war in Vietnam and Syria from different planes.
  • nick g Offline
    nick g (xx) 16 May 2020 08: 44
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    Another retarded general.
  • The comment was deleted.