They want to expel Solovyov from Russian television


On the Internet on the well-known resource change.org appeared petition for removing the famous journalist and TV presenter Vladimir Solovyov from Russian television.


The petition has many reasons. So, according to the authors, Solovyov acts rudely with guests in a television studio, as well as with radio listeners; often tells a lie, thereby discrediting both Russia and himself; allegedly accepted the citizenship of the NATO country (this is not a crime, just a dishonorable act of a person who positions himself as a Russian patriot); it takes up a lot of expensive airtime of one of the leading state television channels with low ratings of Soloviev’s programs on the YouTube platform.

Vladimir Soloviev replied that he was indifferent to the petitions published on a foreign resource - they did not inspire confidence. In addition, in his opinion, the television audience ultimately votes with a button - there is always the opportunity to switch to another program.

A complaint about the presenter to Roskomnadzor was signed by about 55 thousand people.

Earlier Soloviev kicked out from his political talk show by Ukrainian expert Vyacheslav Kovtun for false and provocative statements about Russia. The presenter said at the same time that he removed Kovtun "now forever."
Used photos: http://www.kremlin.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

65 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. rotkiv04 Offline
    rotkiv04 (Victor) April 24 2020 17: 55
    0
    • 7
    • 7
    Kovtun is not sorry, these ukroidiots do not need to be invited at all, but the fact that Solovyov has unbelted and crossed all boundaries of decency is 100500%. Yes, and too much of it is already on the channel itself, is there really no more interesting and worthy presenter on RT except this unbalanced boor?
    1. King3214 Offline
      King3214 (Sergius) April 24 2020 18: 16
      +6
      • 12
      • 6
      As far as I understand, the program goes out at night.
      You don’t love him so much that you cannot sleep at night?
      Trouble !!!
      1. Observer2014 Offline
        Observer2014 April 24 2020 20: 25
        -4
        • 6
        • 10
        Quote: King3214
        As far as I understand, the program goes out at night. You don’t love him so much that you cannot sleep at night?
        Trouble !!!

        laughing It seems that this is the "evening" printed. And a bunch of himself assented. wassat
        1. King3214 Offline
          King3214 (Sergius) April 24 2020 21: 24
          0
          • 3
          • 3
          It is not clear from the text - is this good or bad?
  2. anakost Offline
    anakost (Andrei) April 24 2020 18: 02
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Of course there is. Listen to Norkin.
  3. 123 Offline
    123 (123) April 24 2020 18: 09
    +7
    • 14
    • 7
    A petition appeared on the Internet for the well-known change.org resource to remove the famous journalist and TV presenter Vladimir Solovyov from Russian television.

    Who cares? There are no irreplaceable ones.
    Soloviev’s fate on TV is not very worrying, but the essence of the voiced claims is curious, the argument is below the plinth.

    The petition has many reasons. So, according to the authors, Soloviev behaves rudely with guests in a television studio, as well as with radio listeners.

    Behaves rude? On the show? So this is his role. If you remove everyone who behaves rudely, you can close the television.

    often tells a lie, thereby discrediting both Russia and himself.

    What about the facts?

    allegedly accepted the citizenship of the NATO country (this is not a crime, just a dishonorable act of a person who positions himself as a Russian patriot)

    Supposedly . That is, we remove, because we suspect? Even without confirmation of the fact? Let’s start with Posner and Brilev, they definitely have.

    it takes up a lot of expensive airtime of one of the leading state television channels with low ratings of Soloviev’s programs on the YouTube platform.

    Who takes it from? And who is claiming expensive airtime? Buzova? What is the essence of the claims? Do not like it - do not look, YouTube has not yet been blocked, look at the health that you like.
    1. Observer2014 Offline
      Observer2014 April 24 2020 20: 32
      -4
      • 6
      • 10
      Allegedly. That is, we remove, because we suspect? Even without confirmation of the fact? Let’s start with Posner and Brilev, they definitely have.

      Come on! And come on, let’s start with the evening hamlo. And violet do not care for his personal "patience" Kovtun. laughing
      1. 123 Offline
        123 (123) April 24 2020 22: 39
        +3
        • 8
        • 5
        Do not bite again? Firstly, having a second citizenship is not a violation of the law. Secondly, citizenship is assumed in this case.
        As for where to start? Maybe from you? He wanted to live like a normal Bedouin, 2 camels, 8 wives. smile
    2. Marzhecki Offline
      Marzhecki (Sergei) April 25 2020 07: 29
      -3
      • 2
      • 5
      Quote: 123
      The petition has many reasons. So, according to the authors, Soloviev behaves rudely with guests in a television studio, as well as with radio listeners.

      Behaves rude? On the show? So this is his role. If you remove everyone who behaves rudely, you can close the television.

      Thank you for such a "role." For our money, he behaves boorishly.
      1. 123 Offline
        123 (123) April 25 2020 07: 54
        +4
        • 5
        • 1
        Thank you for such a "role." For our money, he behaves boorishly.

        You are constantly talking nonsense here, but nobody offers to expel you. request
    3. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) April 26 2020 16: 58
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      123, House-2 - all of them!
      1. 123 Offline
        123 (123) April 26 2020 18: 24
        +3
        • 3
        • 0
        House-2 - all of them!

        It may even be, perhaps this explains a lot. what For about a week or so, I had to watch this fascinating program (it was not me who controlled the TV remote control). Impressions are unforgettable. laughing
  4. King3214 Offline
    King3214 (Sergius) April 24 2020 18: 14
    10
    • 14
    • 4
    Ukrainian "non-brothers" went crazy completely. They have already beguiled everything and the coast has lost everything.
    The voting resource is not Russian, who votes there, except for the "non-brothers," is not known.
    As a resident of Russia, Solovyov does not cause any hot emotions in me.
    It works and works, and judging by the reaction of “garbage from abroad”, it probably works well!
    Now let him work on!
    1. Digital error Offline
      Digital error (Eugene) April 24 2020 18: 44
      +3
      • 6
      • 3
      Quote: King3214
      The voting resource is not Russian, who votes there, except for the "non-brothers," is not known.

      That's it. If the author of the petition didn’t want to “hype”, but to do the job, he would have submitted a petition to the site of the Russian Public Initiative. If I remember correctly, there at 100 thousand + a mandatory review follows.

      Quote: King3214
      Now let him work on!

      Those who don’t like it don’t look. The question is different - what part of his salary is paid by taxpayers? I wouldn’t give a penny to this chernukha, but Interfax in September last year announced the Finance Ministry’s proposal to increase state funding by almost a third, 2020 billion rubles were pledged specifically for VGTRK for 24.
      1. King3214 Offline
        King3214 (Sergius) April 24 2020 21: 28
        +4
        • 6
        • 2
        You probably do not know, but almost all the top TV presenters are far from poor people. Remember KVNschik Svetlakov, so he has apartments, houses and not only in Russia. Or Martirosyan, who has long been a dollar millionaire with real estate and citizenship not only in Russia. Do you have any complaints against Svetlakov or Martirosyan, or against others? Why do you single out Soloviev against this background? He is the same as everything on TV.
        1. bobba94 Offline
          bobba94 (Vladimir) April 24 2020 21: 47
          +3
          • 4
          • 1
          I constantly ran across messages and comments about Solovyov’s 3-story Italian villa on the Internet, once I could not stand it and googled the financial condition of one chubby African-American TV presenter, her name is Oprah Winfrey. Googled, looked on YouTube her estates in California and other places, found out about more than 2 billion in stock and concluded that Solovyov and our other TV presenters are just rogues compared to their Western colleagues.
          1. Marzhecki Offline
            Marzhecki (Sergei) April 25 2020 07: 31
            -2
            • 2
            • 4
            Counter-question, Oprah from whom receives money, from private television channels or from the state?
        2. Digital error Offline
          Digital error (Eugene) April 24 2020 22: 08
          +4
          • 4
          • 0
          Quote: King3214
          Do you have any complaints against Svetlakov or Martirosyan, or against others? Why do you single out Soloviev against this background?

          Svetlakov and Martirosyan, unlike Solovyov, do not claim to be the ultimate truth and do not teach anyone to “live and think correctly”.
          The genre is different. There are claims to them - there is a lot of humor "below the belt" (although if I enter their position, it is easier to monetize it). Utkin, maybe, goes too far (perhaps for the same purpose - to monetize hype), but this video -



          - reminded me of the deeply disastrous words addressed to Navalny by General Zolotov:

          I promise to make you a good juicy chop in a few minutes.

          Even here he does not shine with creativity (unlike Martirosyan himself), preferring to use “ready-made solutions” in the form of banal threats of physical violence. Maybe it’s even easier - they (the cogs of the state machine) are not used to public criticism and cannot tolerate it just to disgust, not understanding in the heat of the day that they are not barking at their subordinates.
          PS And I just do not like Solovyov. Powerful argument, right?
          And most importantly, not refutable. smile
      2. Bulanov Offline
        Bulanov (Vladimir) April 24 2020 22: 21
        +4
        • 5
        • 1
        And how much is Ekho Moskvy paid by taxpayers?
        1. Digital error Offline
          Digital error (Eugene) April 24 2020 22: 32
          0
          • 1
          • 1
          I don’t watch (I don’t read), but, I remember, this publication is recognized as a "foreign agent." If I am not mistaken, it is financed in this way by advertisers and "donates", including from abroad. Why the question?
          1. Arkharov Offline
            Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 09: 11
            -2
            • 1
            • 3
            You are mistaken in everything. Most of the shares are owned by Gazprom Media Holding, the vast majority of the activity pays off through advertising.

            According to the data of “Medialogy” for April 2012, “Echo of Moscow” was the most quoted radio station, while being ahead of all TV channels and all magazines, and second only to a number of newspapers.
            According to some observers both in Russia and in the West, Echo is the only truly independent media in Russia, and the only evidence that freedom of information for the mass listener still exists.
            According to Medialogia, Ekho Moskvy is the most influential radio in Russia, and among other media outlets on this indicator it is on a par with such media as Kommersant, Channel One, and Vedomosti. By the absolute value of the citation index for 2011, Echo of Moscow (1675,25) surpasses all TV channels and magazines.

            https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ - Эхо Москвы
            1. Digital error Offline
              Digital error (Eugene) April 26 2020 09: 27
              0
              • 2
              • 2
              Quote: Arkharov
              You are mistaken in everything

              I didn’t claim the truth, but thanks for the educational program. By the way, what is the justification for finding the official site of Gazprom-Media Holding JSC in the .com domain zone? And the second question - the holder of the register of shareholders is ZAO Specialized Registrar-Holder of the Register of Shareholders of the Gas Industry.
              As far as I know, in our "gas industry" there is capital of foreign "investors", so they have not convinced yet.
              Kommersant and Vedomosti - I read. I go to Echo of Moscow extremely rarely (the recommendation on films that are worth watching in isolation became extremely interesting) - I like to read the comments under the articles, and there is a "garbage can" - everything immediately goes to the person, no constructive thing.
              1. Arkharov Offline
                Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 10: 05
                -2
                • 1
                • 3
                I think this is almost the only domestic media out of whose publications one can still draw more or less truthful information. And as for domain names, registrar holders - I think it’s not at all our business with you. Believe me, everything has been done there as it should, I am not at all understanding these matters in any way, and I have no doubt for a minute.
                1. Digital error Offline
                  Digital error (Eugene) April 26 2020 10: 16
                  +2
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  Quote: Arkharov
                  Believe me, everything is done there as it should

                  I never doubt it. The question is - who needs it? smile hi
                  1. Arkharov Offline
                    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 15: 58
                    -4
                    • 0
                    • 4
                    The smart people who did it. Believe me, not for you at all.
                2. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) April 26 2020 13: 23
                  +1
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  Quote: Arkharov
                  I think this is almost the only domestic media out of whose publications one can still draw more or less truthful information. And as for domain names, registrar holders - I think it’s not at all our business with you. Believe me, everything has been done there as it should, I am not at all understanding these matters in any way, and I have no doubt for a minute.

                  Who would doubt - really, why should readers and listeners know who pays (essentially orders) the content of what they read (listen)?
                  There was a period when I waited with great impatience for each issue of Novaya Gazeta until, purely by chance, on a train, I came across a brow who worked in one of the editorial offices of NG in the regions, and he witnessed in fact direct funding from over the hill, . Well, the proverb “who dines with the girl dances her” so far no one has canceled - so I don’t read NG ...
                  1. Arkharov Offline
                    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 16: 03
                    -3
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    I don’t see in your head that there can be at least several places with unbiased journalism in the whole country? Do you really think that this contradicts the very essence of the current reality?
                    1. 321 Offline
                      321 (321) April 26 2020 16: 16
                      -1
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      Quote: Arkharov
                      I don’t see in your head that there can be at least several places with unbiased journalism in the whole country? Do you really think that this contradicts the very essence of the current reality?

                      Why am I going to stop you from believing that TAM is unbiased? But how it really is a very big question, I have already given examples, above ...
                      And about I won’t even argue with the smart people who arranged all this for you - the main question is, for whom did they arrange it? And for what purpose? But these questions have already been asked to you, in fact, no one is expecting an answer from you, do not worry, this level is not subject to you ... laughing
              2. 321 Offline
                321 (321) April 26 2020 13: 16
                +1
                • 2
                • 1
                Quote: DigitalError
                ... As far as I know, in our "gas industry" there is capital of foreign "investors", so they have not convinced yet.
                Kommersant and Vedomosti - I read. I go to Echo of Moscow extremely rarely (the recommendation on films that are worth watching in isolation became extremely interesting) - I like to read the comments under the articles, and there is a "garbage can" - everything immediately goes to the person, no constructive thing.

                In this case, I have to note that they are trying to get you a "sturgeon of not the first freshness", the data for 2011-12 - now almost nothing, for ten years a lot has changed, including the reputation of Echo. It’s not for nothing that you wrote that there are continuous transitions to personalities in the comments, which is precisely why, although not only. I practically stopped going in there - well, if you recall some epoch-making mistakes - that about talking with Weller, that about one and a half billion - this is not a mistake, just a billion repressed in an interview ...
                1. A.Lex Offline
                  A.Lex (Secret information) April 26 2020 17: 17
                  +1
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  ... Moreover, Echo, Commerce and Vedomosti are publishers with foreign funding.
              3. A.Lex Offline
                A.Lex (Secret information) April 26 2020 17: 13
                0
                • 1
                • 1
                Well, understand, Zhenya, do you read foreign agents?
                1. Digital error Offline
                  Digital error (Eugene) April 26 2020 17: 49
                  0
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  Greetings, I haven’t seen each other for a long time. smile hi
                  Of course, I read it - for symmetry with Rush Tudey.
                  The truth in the middle.
                  1. A.Lex Offline
                    A.Lex (Secret information) April 29 2020 19: 59
                    +2
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    ... I would advise you to re-read the newspaper Pravda - that’s where the truth about capitalism was ... but it has no right to advise you ... hi
  5. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) April 24 2020 18: 40
    +4
    • 5
    • 1
    Another order that no one needs.

    change.org - American garbage, has nothing to do with official transfers in the Russian Federation.
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) April 26 2020 17: 18
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      ... well, at least once, Serge, wrote something worthwhile ...
  6. nikolaj1703 Offline
    nikolaj1703 (Nikolai) April 24 2020 18: 49
    +3
    • 6
    • 3
    A complaint about the presenter to Roskomnadzor was signed by about 55 thousand people.

    Who are these citizens on change.org, from which countries, from which continents? Probably very smart casserole-headed hammers.
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 09: 04
      -4
      • 0
      • 4
      No, the petition is Russian-speaking, most ordinary Russian citizens. Already 87600. Another look -

      https://www.change.org/p/italiani-non-lasciate-che-il-russo-goebbels-per-ottenere-la-cittadinanza-in-italia

      - There are already 220000. So, there is no need for fairy tales about “clever pan-sauce-hammers”, and we do not have enough adequate and thinking people.
      1. A.Lex Offline
        A.Lex (Secret information) April 26 2020 17: 19
        +1
        • 2
        • 1
        Everything that does not have a Russian “residence permit” is initially in the furnace.
  7. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) April 24 2020 18: 58
    -1
    • 6
    • 7
    Long overdue!
  8. Xuli (o) Tebenado April 24 2020 19: 22
    -2
    • 3
    • 5
  9. aleksandrmakedo Offline
    aleksandrmakedo (Dubovitsky Victor Kuzmich) April 24 2020 20: 11
    +2
    • 4
    • 2
    I perfectly understand why in the studio of Solovyov, and others, too, these undershots like Kovtun appear.
    A wonderful demonstration of the idiocy of some representatives of the Ukrainian media. The stupidity of this “candidate of sciences” and “associate professor” (that's for sure, the hero of Kartsev), rolls over, this offended the site “Peacemaker”, which set out to teach him the right to protect ukrov. Even they felt ashamed.
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 16: 59
      -1
      • 1
      • 2
      And what, Kovtun is very different from the rest of the characters in these representations? Often, I think, even for the better.
  10. 69 Offline
    69 April 24 2020 22: 25
    +7
    • 8
    • 1
    It’s time for the rest of the Urgants and Posners to kick in the ass.
  11. Nikolay Rusin Offline
    Nikolay Rusin (Nikolai Rusin) April 25 2020 04: 21
    -3
    • 3
    • 6
    Well, you are naive. Do you think and think that they can remove the TV presenter Solovyov on TV and in the media at your request or complaint? Ridiculous absurdity. Rather, they will remove all viewers and listeners, and reading the media. These will be the "Nightingales", but you will not be and never will be. There is no TV and media, but it is 4 power and the most powerful and influential. Is it you with whom or with what fools you are trying to fight, and even dictate and set your requirements and conditions? "Solovyov" live, well, and you need to be on demand, and fun, and for the good and health of all TV and the media. This is yours and it will serve for the most ancient profession - journalism. Accept my grief and sadness and comfort in your informational being and life.
    1. Digital error Offline
      Digital error (Eugene) April 25 2020 14: 51
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      Quote: Nikolai Rusin
      There is no media, but 4 power

      Exactly, and in the case of Solovyov "Zaputinsky." In self-respecting organizations, there is a "code of ethics" (it does not matter what it is called, but even the "United Russia" recently deprived a party ticket of a certain Dmitry Ovsyannikov). This is a federal highly paid propagandist and with his primitive threats, he discredits not only the VGTRK, but also the current government. I think they will soon pay attention to it and he will die out of his "loyal" ardor.
      And if they don’t pay ... see you in the elections. laughing
      1. A.Lex Offline
        A.Lex (Secret information) April 26 2020 17: 22
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        Zhenya, well, do not read and watch foreign agents?
    2. 321 Offline
      321 (321) April 26 2020 16: 24
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Quote: Nikolai Rusin
      Well, you are naive. Do you think and think that they can remove the TV presenter Solovyov on TV and in the media at your request or complaint? Ridiculous absurdity. Rather, they will remove all viewers and listeners, and reading the media. These will be the "Nightingales", but you will not be and never will be. There’s no TV and media, but it’s 4 power and the most powerful and influential.

      In how - it turns out, the most influential among us - this is Soloviev and Pozner - figuratively. bully You can’t read anything further from you, everything is already clear ... negative
      PS And what about those who do not watch TV at all? hi
    3. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) April 26 2020 17: 21
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      Kohl, you have long been told - do not like it, DO NOT LOOK. And here to remove - not to remove ...
  12. ver_ Offline
    ver_ (Vera) April 25 2020 06: 51
    0
    • 4
    • 4
    ... some Jews on the screen ...
  13. antibi0tikk Offline
    antibi0tikk (Sergei) April 25 2020 09: 42
    +1
    • 5
    • 4
    Here is some kind of kapets!
    As one character used to say, "But I'm not a dime, so that everyone likes me!"
    Do not like Solovyov? See Gordon or some other nt shellupon.
    I like his shows. In some ways I do not agree with him, but in many ways he is right. I also like that he keeps many facts and figures in his head, and does not read from a piece of paper.
    Here on the site I like Marzhetsky with Neukropny. I also agree with them in something, but I’m ready to argue with something. But that is because the task of a journalist or presenter is not to accept HIS point of view as the ultimate truth, but to make YOU THINK. Solovyov’s doing it well.
    1. RusDon Offline
      RusDon (Igor) April 25 2020 11: 26
      -2
      • 2
      • 4
      I also like that he keeps many facts and figures in his head, and does not read from a piece of paper.

      - heard the word * prompter *? And this prompter is broadcasting in his ears ... You didn’t think that before the transfer everything was discussed with the workers of the show, what and how to tell ... And look at what * clever words and sentences * this Jew expresses - at his show and on other programs ... But what became impudent .. so it became after a series of programs about Putin and a personal acquaintance with the president))) He agreed once so that I began to despise him ... He told Russian historian - that in our Russian land before us Jews lived)))
  14. Tsar Tsarevich Offline
    Tsar Tsarevich (Tsar Tsarevich) April 25 2020 10: 05
    +2
    • 4
    • 2
    Solovyov - the mouthpiece of truth, cuts the truth of the uterus to the right and left. Indeed, neither Kovtun and Gozman are heresy to listen to.
    1. RusDon Offline
      RusDon (Igor) April 25 2020 11: 30
      0
      • 3
      • 3
      This is while he is at the feeding trough - he will sing the nightingale ... And when he was not yet allowed to do it - he was against Putin and was an ardent supporter of love for America .. He does not say anything against America .... real estate, relatives are there) )) Slippery type ... thoroughbred Jew ..
    2. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 08: 55
      -4
      • 0
      • 4
      Well, if everything he says there is true for you, then what is a lie?
      1. A.Lex Offline
        A.Lex (Secret information) April 26 2020 17: 24
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        You, Grisha, you ...
  15. aries2200 Offline
    aries2200 (aries) April 25 2020 14: 16
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Better to the historical homeland and quickly.
  16. aleksandrmakedo Offline
    aleksandrmakedo (Dubovitsky Victor Kuzmich) April 25 2020 20: 00
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Quote: rotkiv04
    Kovtun is not sorry, these ukroidiots do not need to be invited at all, but the fact that Solovyov has unbelted and crossed all boundaries of decency is 100500%. Yes, and too much of it is already on the channel itself, is there really no more interesting and worthy presenter on RT except this unbalanced boor?

    Confucius said that order in the country begins with the proper naming of things.
    Scum should be called scum. Bastard - a bastard. Fascist - fascist.
    Condemning Solovyov, you justify all this abomination. Are you from one garden, in that case?
    You need to invite such a transfer. To any idiot, finally, it became clear what these garbage are. I would like to make a remark to the host of the program. It is necessary to approve the order in the program so that if only the presenter begins to open his mouth to say something, the rest are silent, at least half a word. Otherwise - a red card and the road from the studio. At least - in this program. And no scandals and skirmishes. The most severe discipline.
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 08: 53
      -5
      • 0
      • 5
      One bastard another? And vice versa?
  17. aleksandrmakedo Offline
    aleksandrmakedo (Dubovitsky Victor Kuzmich) April 25 2020 20: 05
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Quote: RusDon
    I also like that he keeps many facts and figures in his head, and does not read from a piece of paper.

    - heard the word * prompter *? And this prompter is broadcasting in his ears ... You didn’t think that before the transfer everything was discussed with the workers of the show, what and how to tell ... And look at what * clever words and sentences * this Jew expresses - at his show and on other programs ... But what became impudent .. so it became after a series of programs about Putin and a personal acquaintance with the president))) He agreed once so that I began to despise him ... He told Russian historian - that in our Russian land before us Jews lived)))

    Have you never learned to speak and listen to the prompter at the same time? Or learned? Moreover, if the transmission is not according to a pre-written text, although in the order specified by the directors. You thought how the prompter will manage to insert the info necessary at the right moment, so as not to confuse, not to be late and not to run. So, you sculpt, a hunchbacked, wise guy of their shabby theater.
  18. aleksandrmakedo Offline
    aleksandrmakedo (Dubovitsky Victor Kuzmich) April 25 2020 20: 11
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Quote: ver_
    ... some Jews on the screen ...

    So podshamansya, learn, develop the brain, and speak. They say they pay a lot there. But the beat is also cruel. Grandfather Schukar only therefore did not become an artist. Comrade Davydov told ....
  19. Alexander Semenov (Alexander Semenov) April 25 2020 20: 38
    -1
    • 2
    • 3
    He’s a patriot ... you can’t kick him out !? Even the face is so patriotic, it’s just as if ready even tomorrow for an embrasure! I am sure he will be the first to go to enemy tanks !!
  20. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 26 2020 08: 50
    -4
    • 0
    • 4
    I signed it with pleasure. It’s a pity, since it’s impossible a hundred.
  21. aleksandrmakedo Offline
    aleksandrmakedo (Dubovitsky Victor Kuzmich) April 26 2020 10: 27
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Quote: Alexander Semenov
    He’s a patriot ... you can’t kick him out !? Even the face is so patriotic, it’s just as if ready even tomorrow for an embrasure! I am sure he will be the first to go to enemy tanks !!

    Are you not like that, of course? So offended? Everything is clear with you. Therefore, he was offended that he himself was ....
  22. aleksandrmakedo Offline
    aleksandrmakedo (Dubovitsky Victor Kuzmich) April 26 2020 10: 39
    +2
    • 3
    • 1
    Quote: Arkharov
    One bastard another? And vice versa?

    Well, if you are, then yourself - the third bastard?
    Or, after all, the first?
  23. Serge Tixiy Offline
    Serge Tixiy (Serge Tixiy) April 26 2020 14: 11
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    "They want to expel" - many may want, but not for them to decide .... I don’t like Solovyov, his manner of behavior, so what? Those to whom he earns money will decide. And such a scandal is only “on hand” to them. The program will be watched by new viewers who have not heard of it.