US media: A new rocket is being created in the United States to attack Russia and China


The new American missile is designed to deliver massive nuclear strikes on the territory of Russia, China and the DPRK. It is reported by the American edition of Military Watch.


The U.S. Air Force plans to create a new class of ballistic missiles by 2029, which will maintain intercontinental range and will be able to deliver several nuclear hypersonic warheads to the target. It is expected that the new missile will replace the obsolete Minuteman III and, as specified, will include Technology from the new Trident II D5 marine ballistic missiles recently integrated into the Ohio submarines of the US Navy.

The Russian Yars, Sarmatians and Vanguards, as well as the Chinese DF-41, are already significantly superior to Minuteman III. And now the United States has faced a new strategic challenge - the DPRKs Hwasong-14 and Hwasong-15 manufactured by the DPRK, which have already demonstrated their capabilities.

The United States needs a new missile to partially reduce the gap between the Russians and the Chinese, while at the same time providing an advantage over the North Koreans. It is expected that the new missiles will be used until the 2080s.

The deployment of new missile defense systems by US adversaries - primarily the S-500 Prometey and A-235 Nudol in Russia - cast doubt on the effectiveness of the Minutemans. It is expected that the new American ballistic missile will be able to overcome even the most advanced air defense systems.
Photos used: https://www.flickr.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

98 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Orange big Offline
    Orange big (Max) April 18 2020 11: 50
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    US Air Force plans to create a new class of ballistic missiles by 2029

    Consider, they will create it only in 10 years, at best, and there "either donkey or padish" by that time, as Nasreddin said.

    The deployment of new missile defense systems by US adversaries - primarily the S-500 Prometey and A-235 Nudol in Russia - cast doubt on the effectiveness of the Minutemans. It is expected that the new American ballistic missile will be able to overcome even the most advanced air defense systems.

    Well, you can expect anything, with regards to overcoming the most advanced missile defense systems, another thing is how it will actually be. Although the same S-500 and A-235 are still being tested and have not entered service.
  2. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) April 18 2020 11: 59
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    Rockets for this purpose were created by Russia, India, China, even Korea ... and the Americans are now.

    Now gasoline will definitely rise in price))))
  3. King3214 Offline
    King3214 (Sergius) April 18 2020 12: 07
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Will the US survive until 2029? And if they survive, then how many states will remain in the "United States"?
  4. Cat Offline
    Cat (Sergei) April 18 2020 14: 21
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    In my opinion, this is desuha. They do not need it from the word - at all. They have enough on the naval strategic nuclear forces, and nobody needs the Third World War, including the "winners". What the hell is such a war if the whole world turns into a radiation desert? These are all "scarecrows." They have other methods ... "color revolutions", coups, etc. Why would they destroy the same capitalist country as the United States - Russia. Which already gives them everything. In fact, are we their colony or full moon? The Russian oligarchs, each in their sector, are working on the high confidence they have shown. The capitalists of all countries come together and agree. Why do they need a war? As, in fact, with all countries of the capitalist world, where each president is actually their resident. A limited war can only be with those countries where there can be insoluble situations on religious or political grounds. Well, for this there is poison, bribery, corruption. And let the strategic nuclear forces be, you never know what ...
    1. Orange big Offline
      Orange big (Max) April 18 2020 16: 56
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      Quote: Cat
      In my opinion, this is desuha. They do not need it from the word - at all. They have enough on the naval strategic nuclear forces, and nobody needs the Third World War, including the "winners". What the hell is such a war if the whole world turns into a radiation desert? These are all "scarecrows." They have other methods ... "color revolutions", coups, etc. Why would they destroy the same capitalist country as the United States - Russia. Which already gives them everything. In fact, are we their colony or full moon? The Russian oligarchs, each in their sector, are working on the high confidence they have shown. The capitalists of all countries come together and agree. Why do they need a war? As, in fact, with all countries of the capitalist world, where each president is actually their resident. A limited war can only be with those countries where there can be insoluble situations on religious or political grounds. Well, for this there is poison, bribery, corruption. And let the strategic nuclear forces be, you never know what ...

      It's not about the war. Minutemans 3, strategic aviation represented by B-52H, B-1 Lancer, B-2 Spirit, as well as Trident D 5 as well as their Ohio carriers are not eternal. And they need to be changed for something, if the United States, of course, does not plan to abandon strategic offensive capabilities and lag behind China, Russia, and the DPRK. And in order to change something, it is necessary to develop and test it for a long time - at least 10 years.
    2. Winnie Offline
      Winnie (Winnie) April 19 2020 15: 42
      -3
      • 0
      • 3
      Nobody needs the third world war, including the “winners”. What the hell is such a war if the whole world turns into a radiation desert?

      The hegemon has completely different views on the situation. The Americans are fighting for world domination. But not with Russia, but with China. The Americans are well aware that taking China from the sea unreal. Therefore they need land border with China. It can be obtained only by capturing Russia. Therefore, sooner or later, America will attack Russia.

      As for the "radioactive desert," then the Americans will make every effort to never have it. To do this, they switch to nuclear weapons and deploy missile defense in space. And so that there would be no answer, they, from the filing of "Beale's friend," plant their permanent man in the Kremlin.
      1. Dear sofa expert. April 20 2020 19: 27
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        .. Therefore, they need a land border with China. It can be obtained only by capturing Russia ..

        Funny) You would have to work in the circus. Isn’t it easier then to capture Mongolia?))
        1. Winnie Offline
          Winnie (Winnie) April 22 2020 23: 53
          -4
          • 0
          • 4
          Why can't you see anything further than your nose? Russia is only an intermediate link in the US-China war. Simply put, Russia is Poland in 1939. And do not push. And then pride for the country through the ass will climb.
          1. 321 Offline
            321 (321) April 23 2020 08: 06
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            Quote: Winnie
            Why can't you see anything further than your nose? Russia is only an intermediate link in the US-China war. Simply put, Russia is Poland in 1939 ...

            Another iksperd drew. negative
            “Walk ischo” (c) - people like you don’t mind at all that there is a club at this “intermediate link” who want to try it - welcome !!!
            Only a small detail - it is advisable to write a testament to such an attempt before such an attempt ... hi

            Quote: Winnie
            ... And do not push. And then pride for the country through the ass will climb.

            I won’t even try to argue about pushing - you know better what you have and where it comes from. bully
            And about pride in the country - yes, I have it, and don’t try to poke your dirty hands there ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Winnie Offline
              Winnie (Winnie) April 25 2020 23: 36
              -3
              • 0
              • 3
              such a poland-intermediate link has a club ...

              Another victim of propaganda. Russia has no "club" !!! Only blah, blah, blah. request
              1. 321 Offline
                321 (321) April 26 2020 00: 19
                +1
                • 1
                • 0
                Quote: Winnie
                ... Another victim of propaganda. Russia has no "club" !!! Only blah, blah, blah. request

                Your writings in this regard have long been of little interest to anyone, so right now I’ll drop everything and rush to prove to you, bully yeah, wait - and go ahead tell your fables about all-all sold plutonium and everything else is yours from the same opera ... bully negative hi
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Dear sofa expert. 18 May 2020 19: 23
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            .. Therefore, they need a land border with China ..

            .. Isn’t it easier then to capture Mongolia?) ..

            Mongolia has a larger border with China than the Russian one, and the Americans can capture Mongolia without risk of becoming a nuclear ashes. )
        2. Winnie Offline
          Winnie (Winnie) 18 May 2020 18: 32
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          After Russia.
  5. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker April 18 2020 14: 39
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Americans do not hide the fact that they want to bend the whole world for themselves. "Either obey, or die," they say so almost openly to everyone. And those who do not want to bend should arm themselves. And at the same time they finance the USA themselves. As if this extra money for the states. At the same time, everyone understands that this money will be used to create weapons to make the stubborn bend under them. And, by the way, China also begins to bend countries, like the United States. The same ways. And only an economically independent state can change something. And the first thing all independent states must do is stop funding the United States.
  6. Georgievic Offline
    Georgievic (Georgievic) April 18 2020 14: 49
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    It is interesting that the Military Watch will sing when the Russian Federation adopts the doctrine of a preemptive strike ?! And it is not far off because of the arrogance of the United States.
    1. Cat Offline
      Cat (Sergei) April 18 2020 21: 04
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      Yes, it does not seem to scare them. Of course, they are afraid of only one thing, dozens - hundreds of "Hiroshima and Nagasak" on their continent. But they already have a mobile (marine) missile defense system with ASU "Aegis". In addition, due to its mobility, it is close to our shores. And this is about 2-3 !!! simplifies the interception task. It’s one thing to flood a 30-meter ICBM crawling into orbit, and it’s another to intercept a dozen of its meter-long warheads falling on our head at a speed of 7 km / s. So in fact, we have no missile defense. Actually, they also have a missile defense system in the United States. There is no country. There are separate components, and only, as we have near Moscow. Since, no matter how strong and rich they are, it is impossible to cover the whole territory and bring down all BBs and this does not suit them. Therefore, they carried their missile defense to EM and KR into the seas. Unfortunately, we will not be able to do this for several reasons. Firstly, there are no small-sized missile interceptors like them, like SM-6, and there is not a single ship like their Arly Burke EM, on which there can be up to hundreds of these SM-6s, and even these EMs fifty, + allies Korea, Japan, a dozen more. As I understand it, it makes no sense to engage in missile defense for us, we won’t pull it. The best missile defense for us will be that our ICBMs will be designed to destroy the cities of this country, which means that their accuracy of +/- km is not critical for cities, which means that such warheads will be much cheaper. In addition, they should be, without pampering, a megaton class per calculation, one BB - one city. And this can now be done by reconstructing our small-sized ICBM Courier, with a launch weight of only about 17 tons for 1991 ... At least two can be used on conveyors of the Yarsov PGRK, and besides, they can also be lifted by a pair and our IL-76 ... well, I generally keep silent about missile trains and containers.
      1. Winnie Offline
        Winnie (Winnie) April 19 2020 15: 23
        -4
        • 0
        • 4
        All this is true for the time being. More precisely, until 2027, when the Americans according to the plan will receive overwhelming advantage in hyper rockets for delivering a lightning fast global strike. Therefore, before the start of 3MB there is not much time left.

        In addition, they [BB] should be, without mischief, megaton class at the rate of one BB - one city.

        It is only the Russians who are ready to destroy entire cities and continents along with children, women, the elderly and the surviving North American Indians, for whose rights we fought so fervently. Why are we better than fascists? Why love us? And why can not Amers destroy Russia first?
        The Yankees have a completely different approach to nuclear weapons. They change their megaton warheads to kiloton ones (0,5-1,5 kT), i.e. they switch to nuclear weapons. They are not going to destroy the civilian population in large cities (as a potential market and labor force), but only military facilities and infrastructure. Moreover, they have high-precision weapons. After three years, the affected objects will become publicly available.
        They have never had much trouble with Kremlin liberals. Therefore, there will be no answer! The perimeter will not be activated either.
        1. Dear sofa expert. April 20 2020 19: 50
          +3
          • 3
          • 0
          .. It’s only the Russians who are ready to destroy entire cities and continents along with children, women, old people and surviving North American Indians, for whose rights we fought so fervently ..

          Well, so far, in fact, it was the Americans who did it, destroying two Japanese cities “together with children, women, old people ..”
          1. Winnie Offline
            Winnie (Winnie) April 25 2020 02: 53
            -4
            • 0
            • 4
            Well, so far, in fact, it was the Americans who did it, destroying two Japanese cities “together with children, women, old people ..”

            In Russia, the same thing happens, only "democratic" way. ~ 2 million people die every year in the country. Of these, 200 tons are irrecoverable losses, which are not compensated by either the birth rate or the influx of migrants. In fact, Russia suffers population losses comparable to those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki ANNUALLY !!! Go Russia!
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. Dear sofa expert. April 25 2020 08: 53
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              MOSCOW, 24 Jan - RIA News.

              The population of Russia in 2019 continued to decline, but the rate of decline decreased, the Federal State Statistics Service said.
              As noted in the department, as of January 1, 2020, the country's permanent population is estimated at 146 million 745,1 thousand people. This is 35 622 people (0,02 percent) less than at the beginning of 2019.

              Where did you get 200 tons?
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) 17 May 2020 21: 46
                -1
                • 0
                • 1
                See data from Rosstat.

                2000 - 958 532
                2001 - 943 252
                2002 - 935 305
                2003 - 888 525
                2004 - 792 925
                2005 - 846 559
                2006 - 687 066
                2007 - 470 323
                2008 - 362 007
                2009 - 248 856
                2010 - 239 568
                ................................
                2018 - 224 566
        2. Dear sofa expert. April 20 2020 20: 01
          +1
          • 1
          • 0
          ... More precisely, until 2027, when the Americans, according to the plan, will receive an overwhelming advantage in hyper-missiles for delivering a lightning-fast global strike ..

          Well, we already observed one such “lightning strike” when American woe-warriors, together with their partners in the NATO bloc, first prepared for 3 months, and then another 2,5 bombed little Serbia. In 72 days of continuous bombing they managed to destroy .. (now - TA-taaaa!) Already 15 (!)% Of the Serbian military potential. And then the Americans were lucky that they delivered a “lightning strike” against a country that even had nothing to answer.
          That is why already in North Korea they didn’t really want to make “lightning strikes”.)
          And here is Russia. Do you think at all before carrying such nonsense. Fight against Russia-you may not have time to run to the toilet. We’ll make it in the corridor.
          1. Winnie Offline
            Winnie (Winnie) April 22 2020 23: 12
            -3
            • 0
            • 3
            According to the General Staff, in the event of a war with NATO without the use of nuclear weapons, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will not last even three months. In a foreign territory, defeat will come even faster.
            PS The Chinese believe that in case of war Russia will not last even three days.
            1. Dear sofa expert. April 22 2020 23: 19
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              3 months .. something like that happened already .. it seems that this “Barbarossa plan” was called?
            2. Dear sofa expert. April 22 2020 23: 29
              +3
              • 3
              • 0
              And then, who is constantly pushing you to some, to the point of absurdity, stupid hope of "..without the use of nuclear weapons .."? For this purpose, nuclear weapons in Russia exist so that you don’t even have thoughts to build any plans on this subject. Russia has nuclear weapons, and it WILL BE APPLIED, regardless of your emotional experiences. In addition to nuclear weapons, the entire arsenal of available means will be used. There is no need to build illusions about Russia. Russia is not a hare, Russia is a bear. And this, if you want, no one is hiding. A state that managed to get a sixth of the land - a priori, cannot be harmless. But no one promised you that! Another thing is that Russia is not an aggressor. Therefore, until it is touched, sleeping peacefully in the den, it will not harm you. But if you really climbed into the den, be prepared that there’s no wet place on you.
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) 17 May 2020 21: 15
                -1
                • 0
                • 1
                No one is stopping you from believing in the myth of the “great and mighty,” but in reality everything will be much worse. Let's just say this: not according to your scenario written by the agitation industry.
                1. Dear sofa expert. 17 May 2020 21: 30
                  +2
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  ..Nobody prevents you from believing in the myth of the "great and mighty." But in reality, everything will be much worse.

                  In what reality ?? What reality do you yourself live in? Have you taken Crimea without a single shot in virtual reality? Georgia was hit on the head, and no one even dared to intercede for it - also in virtual reality? To Napoleon and Hitler in what reality was the place shown? What realities are you talking about?
            3. 321 Offline
              321 (321) April 23 2020 07: 56
              0
              • 0
              • 0
              Quote: Winnie
              According to the General Staff, in the event of a war with NATO without the use of nuclear weapons, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will not last even three months. In a foreign territory, defeat will come even faster.
              PS The Chinese believe that in case of war Russia will not last even three days.

              But they still gave us three days - what a blessing. laughing
              And you still forgot to give the opinion of the General Staff of Malaysia, here it is interesting to us. bully
              The main thing is that the answer will be - all the attackers, do not forget about it - neither you, nor your owners ... hi
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) 17 May 2020 21: 18
                -1
                • 0
                • 1
                Another believer in the myth of the "great and mighty."
                1. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) 19 May 2020 22: 03
                  +1
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  Quote: Winnie
                  Another believer in the myth of the "great and mighty."

                  I didn’t guess - unlike you, he who knows, but about faith - this is to others. bully
          2. Winnie Offline
            Winnie (Winnie) April 22 2020 23: 27
            -3
            • 0
            • 3
            By the way, you do not understand the meaning of the "lightning fast global strike" and cite some kind of Serbia as an example. This fundamentally does not correspond to this concept, that is, the dullness of pure water. A lightning fast global strike is a strike on any target anywhere in the world within 1 hour. With a massive global strike by hyper-missiles, the air defense and strategic missile forces of the Russian Federation will be suppressed instantly (and not like in Serbia), etc.
            1. Dear sofa expert. April 22 2020 23: 41
              +2
              • 2
              • 0
              About stupidity, you can leave it to yourself) For some reason you are not able to turn on the brain and hear.
              To cause damage to the Armed Forces of the Serbs in 15%, it took 3 (!!!) months of preparation, and 2,5 months of continuous attacks!
              To destroy the same 15% of the armed forces of Russia, it will take years of preparation, which (it may seem strange to you) will not go unnoticed. Not to mention the response of Russia.
              You are talking such utter nonsense, I'm sorry. By God, I’m ready to think that I’m talking with a minor child, and even not very gifted (sorry!)
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) April 26 2020 13: 31
                -3
                • 0
                • 3
                To cause damage to the Armed Forces of the Serbs in 15%, it took 3 (!!!) months of preparation, and 2,5 months of continuous attacks!

                I can not say what is meant by the concept of “damage at 15%,” but the tactics of amers have always remained unchanged.

                Let's talk about the American Army Blitzkrieg first. During the famous operation "Eldorado Canyon" in 1986, the US Army attacked the radar system and the Libyan airfield. It took the military only 18 minutes to strike. The Libyan Air Force was paralyzed in an instant and could not give a retaliatory strike. During the war in Iraq, the U.S. military also used a similar tactic - they first paralyzed the Iraqi radar station and then deployed air forces to attack ground targets. The combined ground forces soon ended the war in Iraq, using high-tech troops and weapons to attack and eliminate targets.
            2. Dear sofa expert. April 22 2020 23: 43
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              My advice to you: do not litter your head with terms, such as a "global blow." This is not about adults.
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) April 26 2020 13: 36
                -3
                • 0
                • 3
                It is unfortunate that you are behind the current trends in the conduct of hostilities and do not want to take them seriously. On one faith in the "great and mighty", "heroic and victorious" you will not go far. belay
            3. 321 Offline
              321 (321) April 23 2020 08: 40
              0
              • 0
              • 0
              Quote: Winnie
              ... Lightning fast global strike - this is striking at any target anywhere in the world for 1 hour. With a massive global strike by hyper-missiles, the air defense and strategic missile forces of the Russian Federation will be suppressed instantly (and not like in Serbia), etc.

              Dreaming cannot be forbidden even to you, but in an hour there will be no suppression of the Strategic Missile Forcesas you wrote here - more precisely - the suppression of empty mines and one more thing - why do you need to know the correct name? hi
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) April 26 2020 13: 44
                -1
                • 0
                • 1
                in an hour there will be no suppression of strategic missile forces, but suppression of empty mines

                You want to say that Russia will attack first which contradicts her military doctrine and Putin’s numerous statements.
                1. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) April 26 2020 13: 52
                  +2
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  Quote: Winnie
                  ... in an hour there will be no suppression of strategic missile forces, but suppression of empty mines

                  You want to say that Russia will attack first .. .

                  Everything has already been written to you earlier - if you do not understand, read it again, then again, and so on until you understand the meaning of what you wrote. hi
                  1. Winnie Offline
                    Winnie (Winnie) April 26 2020 19: 56
                    -1
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    Read below who has the right to launch missiles with nuclear weapons and do not write nonsense about empty missile silos. I will not repeat. hi
                    1. 321 Offline
                      321 (321) April 26 2020 21: 08
                      0
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      Quote: Winnie
                      Read below who has the right to launch missiles with nuclear weapons and do not write nonsense about empty missile silos. I will not repeat. hi

                      I don’t need your “replays”, I represent this system much better than you would like and you wrote nonsense below - learn the materiel. hi
        3. 321 Offline
          321 (321) April 22 2020 06: 32
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          Quote: Winnie
          .
          In addition, they [BB] should be, without mischief, megaton class at the rate of one BB - one city.

          It only Russians are ready to destroy entire cities and continents along with children, women, old people and the surviving North American Indians, for whose rights we fought so fervently. Why are we better than fascists? Why love us? And why can not Amers destroy Russia first? ...

          Again, howls on the topic "well, what are the bad Russians." bully
          And you absolutely do not care what the destruction of cities and continents is planned as a RESPONSE. hi
          And so dearly beloved "amers" I would like to destroy Russia, but here the pens are short, and they will be decently short.
          1. Winnie Offline
            Winnie (Winnie) April 22 2020 23: 31
            -4
            • 0
            • 4
            These “responses” only show wretchedness and backwardness of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, unable to cope with the enemy with conventional weapons.
            1. Dear sofa expert. April 22 2020 23: 57
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              The usual is on swords?)
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) April 25 2020 23: 13
                -2
                • 0
                • 2
                on swords?)

                Where did the swords come from in the Russian army? Only sapper blades! And nothing more. lol
                1. Dear sofa expert. April 25 2020 23: 26
                  +1
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  They will bury them with shovels.
            2. 321 Offline
              321 (321) April 23 2020 07: 46
              0
              • 0
              • 0
              Quote: Winnie
              These “responses” only show wretchedness and backwardness of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, unable to cope with the enemy with conventional weapons.

              The general message of your comments has not been a secret for a long time, but these are your comments, and the fact that they correspond very little to the real state of affairs is your problem ...
              We have nuclear weapons and it can be used in an attack on us - and you can still tell here that everything will be destroyed within an hour, well, and the like - the main thing is that those who attacked will receive an answerbut the rest is already in the details, or are you waiting for someone to write here, in exactly how many minutes or seconds will the counter-strike be delivered? Well wait ...
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) April 25 2020 23: 52
                -2
                • 0
                • 2
                the main thing is that those who attacked will receive an answer

                You are not catching up! Your concepts of retaliation match tales of the agitation industry! In reality, no there will be no retaliatory strike! Not only because all weapons-grade plutonium was sold to America under the EBN, but simply because in Russia NO MANwho would press the red button.
                1. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) April 26 2020 00: 13
                  +1
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  Quote: Winnie
                  ... you are not catching up! Your concepts of retaliation match tales of the agitation industry! In reality, no there will be no retaliatory strike! Not only because all weapons-grade plutonium sold to America under EBN.

                  If you’ve already sold your tales, go tell your cat or doggie, they can believe you, but after that ... well, I’ll put it softly - fantasies from you, what is the rest of your scripture? Correctly - no faith for you!
                  1. Winnie Offline
                    Winnie (Winnie) April 26 2020 10: 27
                    -2
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    no faith for you!

                    ... and only in the zombie box is one truth. lol
                    1. 321 Offline
                      321 (321) April 26 2020 12: 44
                      0
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      Quote: Winnie
                      no faith for you!

                      ... and only in the zombie box is one truth. lol

                      I already wrote about the box for you, but there is a question for you - mine, well, or did you touch the TPK at least once with your hand? hi
            3. Dear sofa expert. April 25 2020 09: 10
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              The most powerful army of the “Tse Europe”, without a single shot, surrendered the Crimea to "wretched and backward."
          2. Winnie Offline
            Winnie (Winnie) April 22 2020 23: 40
            -4
            • 0
            • 4
            By the way, according to military doctrine, the Russian Federation does not have the right to use nuclear weapons first and only in RESPONSE when attacking her using nuclear weapons. NATO is able to defeat Russia with conventional weapons. therefore There will be no response. No matter how you dream.
            1. Dear sofa expert. April 23 2020 00: 02
              +3
              • 3
              • 0
              Do not even hope) no one will wait for the first breaks to see what weapons the aggressor attacked. The answer will be made even before the first missiles or bombs of the aggressor reach their goal. By the way, the answer, due to the superiority of Russian hypersonic technologies, can reach the goal even faster than the “lightning strike” itself) So you can even call it preventive (posthumously, naturally).
              1. Winnie Offline
                Winnie (Winnie) April 26 2020 14: 24
                -2
                • 0
                • 2
                The answer will be made even before the first missiles or bombs of the aggressor reach their goal.

                This is the biggest TALE OF THE RUSSIAN AGITPROM !!! Designed for a typical layman (if you want, a wooden divanoid), which perceives the world only through the TV screen.
                If you really want to figure it out, then let's start in order. So, the duty officer of the missile attack early warning system discovered a mass launch of ICBMs in our direction. Can he press the “red button” and launch missiles with nuclear weapons in response? NO, HE CAN NOT!!! He can only announce a combat alert and report to his superiors. Can the chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces click on the "red button"? NO, HE CAN NOT!!! Can the Minister of Defense press the "red button"? NO, HE CAN NOT!!! Only the right to press the "red button" and launch missiles from nuclear weapons towards the enemy has EXCLUSIVELY THE PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA !!! (He’s the commander in chief.) This is spelled out in the main document of the RF Armed Forces, approved by the military doctrine.
                No second, third, tenths, and even more automation (this is a separate issue) DO NOT HAVE THIS LAW !!!
                Attention, a question! Will the colony governor, liberal Putin, be able to tear down the metropolis to hell? I would appreciate your reply. hi
                1. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) April 26 2020 21: 18
                  0
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  Quote: Winnie
                  ... This is the biggest TALE OF THE RUSSIAN AGITPROM !!! Designed for a typical layman (if you want, a wooden divanoid), which perceives the world only through the TV screen ...

                  Your "creativity", "knowledge" has smiled at your grandmother's level on a bench, not higher, but how much aplomb ...
                  And now the question is for iksperd and a specialist such as you - after the report on the discovery of the mass launch of missiles - deliberately DO NOT write what it really is called, I am not going to educate you, and so - the report has passed, they started, they are flying - and what is the natural initial reaction?
                  They have already written to you more than once - no one will understand how many kilotons or megatons are there - so forget about your balls and tell your masters - THE ANSWER WILL BE! am
                  1. Winnie Offline
                    Winnie (Winnie) April 26 2020 21: 49
                    -3
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    You can have your own fabulous opinion but no one has canceled the military doctrine of the Russian Federation !!!
                    You can carry any nonsense based on your own, distorted imagination, but if the charter says that the gopher is a bird, then it is so! And not a single military YOUR FANTASIES will not execute! am
                    PS I understand that your brain is not able to distinguish propaganda from reality. Therefore, I offer you my deepest condolences. hi
                    1. 321 Offline
                      321 (321) April 26 2020 22: 14
                      0
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      Quote: Winnie
                      You can have your own fabulous opinion but no one has canceled the military doctrine of the Russian Federation !!!... PS I understand that your brain is not able to distinguish propaganda from reality. Therefore, I offer you my deepest condolences. hi

                      Little is left to find out from you, how does the doctrine affect the fact that you DO NOT know how all this is done?
                      PS First, condole yourself. bully Conclusion - you do not know - do not write, "iksperd" you, though not ours. negative hi
                      1. Winnie Offline
                        Winnie (Winnie) 17 May 2020 20: 37
                        -2
                        • 0
                        • 2
                        how is all this done?

                        For people with intellectual disabilities, everything is chewed up in the military doctrine of Russia. And no one is going to change her at your whim. tongue
                      2. 321 Offline
                        321 (321) 19 May 2020 22: 26
                        +1
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        Quote: Winnie
                        how is all this done?

                        For people with intellectual disabilities, everything is chewed up in the military doctrine of Russia. And no one is going to change her at your whim. tongue

                        It remains only for you to understand that you do not need to change anything, but this lack of knowledge does not allow you to do it, and for what reason, I am not interested. hi
    2. Dear sofa expert. April 20 2020 19: 41
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Yours especially smiled:

      ... It's one thing to fill up a 30-meter ICBM crawling into orbit ...

      How and by what you can “fill up” (as I understand it, the Voevod’s speech) a rocket launched from a mine if the mine is located outside physical reach (somewhere in the remote Siberian taiga), and the rocket itself goes vertically upward at launch a height of more than a thousand, or even several thousand kilometers, and only then takes a course towards the target.
      1. Cat Offline
        Cat (Sergei) April 22 2020 02: 44
        0
        • 1
        • 1
        I understand that you are, as it were, not entirely competent in the Alliance missile defense, because you write about the "taiga", etc. Make no mistake, they do everything in order to know where what is and how to deal with it. Do not discount their intelligence and our oligarchs - their Cossacks mishandled. Military and state secrets in the Russian Federation - this is only for you and me ... Believe me, they know and see all our mobile Yars earth complexes in orbits. In terms of operational disguise, they were only afraid of missile trains. All these silos and PGK are known to them with an accuracy of a meter. I will not especially teach you here, because I realized that you do not want to do this in terms of self-education. But just take an interest in open sources, for the SM-3/6 interceptors, for their characteristics, and for the distance from the bases in Poland and Romania to our missile armies. This is the first echelon of interception, and there are three in all, the second on Berks, the third, the weakest on the continent. How naive you are ... Nothing will reach us anywhere. At least they want it and, apparently, can do it. And the war will begin simply, with the sinking in 20 minutes of all our SSBNs, both on the BS and on the DB. I understand that this is also news for you?
        1. 321 Offline
          321 (321) April 22 2020 06: 43
          +1
          • 1
          • 0
          Quote: Cat
          I understand that you are, as it were, not entirely competent in the Alliance missile defense, because you write about the "taiga", etc. Make no mistake, they do everything in order to know where what is and how to deal with it. Do not discount their intelligence and our oligarchs - their Cossacks mishandled. Military and state secrets in the Russian Federation - this is only for you and me ... Believe me, they know and see all our mobile Yars earth complexes in orbits. In terms of operational disguise, they were only afraid of missile trains. All these silos and PGK are known to them to the nearest meter ...

          I can’t say, judging by your comment, that you dealt with these issues professionally - you listed the main set of minuses and pluses of carriers, but there are features in EVERY class, but to disclose them - I don’t have the slightest desire in open sources, and it’s due to these features, well, not everything is as sad as you write here. hi

          Quote: Cat
          ... Nothing will reach us. At least they want it and, apparently, can do it. And the war will begin simply, with the sinking in 20 minutes of all our SSBNs, both on the BS and on the DB. I understand that this is also news for you?

          Want and be able to - well, these are slightly different concepts, right? They want it — yes, they want it, as for the implementation, it’s already harder here - and again, we are already getting into what is at least marked out ...
          And taiga is rather good than bad. bully
        2. Dear sofa expert. April 22 2020 09: 16
          +1
          • 2
          • 1
          There is harm from such a "self-education" as you have (this is akin to self-medication)). You don’t even understand the meaning that I wrote, in some strange way)
          So here. Let's start from the beginning (especially for the “gifted”).

          .. Yours especially smiled:
          ... It's one thing to fill up a 30-meter ICBM crawling into orbit ...

          ICBM mines are usually located in geographically inaccessible areas for a potential enemy (see Siberian taiga).
          Have you heard the saying: “sees the eye, but the tooth is numb”? So this is just such a case.
          Yes, today, by the way, there are enough surveillance tools on both sides, but it’s not enough to observe this, you also need to have a weapon that can reach the mine in time, from the moment the rocket is ready to launch, before it goes into orbit, practically above this point start up. I will not give you time, but I will give you a hint - these are not days, not even hours. It is much faster.
          Now I’ll chew you as a student:
          The distances that must be overcome by the means of destruction of the launch pits are calculated (left, right, up, down - if you look at the globe) in thousands (!) Kilometers. Russia is a vast territory and can geographically afford it. Which, incidentally, can not be said about the potential aggressor. It’s just the Russian “delivery vehicles” that can get as close as possible to even the most distant points of the “potential adversary”.
          So, further:
          Even if these means of destruction, having overcome by titanic efforts all the means of defense of the launch mines of ICBMs themselves (and there are such ones, imagine!) Achieve their goal, then in the best case they will hit the mines that were already shot. The missiles themselves will already be somewhere halfway to visit the aggressor. Well, then a reader. This is precisely the concept of the inevitability of retaliation.
          1. Cat Offline
            Cat (Sergei) April 22 2020 10: 40
            -2
            • 0
            • 2
            Yes, you are just a child .... You can’t even give “arguments” professionally. I will not communicate with children here, respectively, and answer you. Pokedova.
            1. Dear sofa expert. April 22 2020 10: 45
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              ... You can’t even give “arguments” professionally ..

              Professionally - how is it for you? Copy texts from Wikipedia? Well, and here I was crucified, wrote, and still didn’t get it).
            2. Dear sofa expert. April 22 2020 10: 57
              0
              • 0
              • 0
              You probably like it better ?:

              ... The US Department of Defense published the "Missile Defense Review" (2019 Missile Defense Review) - a large-scale document that describes the actions of the United States in this area in future years.

              The document says about the need to develop the latest technologies, which will have to ensure US defense for the next several decades. Among them are combat lasers, a space missile warning system, ballistic missile interceptor fighters and much more.
              "Our task is simple: we need to be sure that we can track and destroy any missile launched in the US - anywhere, anytime, from anywhere," said US President Donald Trump, presenting a review at the US Department of Defense.

              The review suggests a number of radical changes to the US missile defense architecture. So, in space, it is proposed to create not only a network of sensors - a kind of missile launch warning system, but also to place interceptors. In addition, the Americans will begin to actively develop weapons to destroy rockets in the initial stages of flight.

              At the same time, the United States will not abandon nuclear deterrence as the basic doctrine with respect to weapons of mass destruction - missile defense systems, no matter how perfect they may be, will still not be able to stop a massive strike from countries with developed strategic nuclear weapons. US missile defense will remain only part of the nuclear deterrence system, strengthening it ...

              Did you mean that?)
              So this is all in dreams for now, and while these dreams will be realized, the Americans will have new, and much more serious problems.
              By the way, they already have them.
              While the Americans (since the Reagan “SDI program”) have been dreaming of finding a means of defeating ICBMs, they have already put the “Dagger” and other types of the latest hypersonic systems under their bellies.
              Russia will not stand still. So do you understand?
  • Dzafdet Offline
    Dzafdet (Sergei) April 19 2020 17: 37
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Trident adopted in 1991. They are going to develop a new missile to replace Trident. Commissioning deadline in 2035 ...
    1. Dear sofa expert. April 21 2020 01: 26
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      That's good. So, until the 35th year of the war there will be no)
    2. Dear sofa expert. April 23 2020 00: 26
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Trident is shit. The steps of these systems are stored and maintained not at the military, but at civilian facilities. Not the fact that they will take off, if suddenly.
      1. Winnie Offline
        Winnie (Winnie) April 26 2020 14: 37
        -3
        • 0
        • 3
        Trident II has the advantage, since this ICBM is capable of carrying at least 8 nuclear blocks weighing 2,7 tons, and its range can guarantee 11 000 kilometers, while the Bulava is equipped with 8 blocks and has a maximum range of 8000 kilometers.

        Mace tests were carried out 19 times - and only 11 of them were successful.

        Since 1987, the US military has experienced the Trident 168 times, and only a few launches have failed, which proves that the Trident II is ten times more reliable than the Mace.
        1. Dear sofa expert. April 26 2020 23: 42
          +1
          • 1
          • 0
          ... and its range can guarantee 11 kilometers, while the Bulava is equipped with 000 blocks and has a maximum range of 8 kilometers ..

          Most American cities are located on the west and east coasts. It will not be difficult for Russian submarines to sail (yes even close!) And reduce the difference in missile range. So there is no difference between 8 or 11 thousand kilometers. But to send Mace across America from a distance of 500 kilometers, this is a few minutes of flight time.
          1. Digital error Offline
            Digital error (Eugene) April 26 2020 23: 58
            0
            • 1
            • 1
            Quote: Dear couch expert.
            Russian submarines will not be difficult to sail

            Will not be, I agree.

            Quote: Dear couch expert.
            And here to send America Mace from a distance of 500 kilometers

            Are you sure you have enough resolve?

            Zbigniew Brzezinski once said: “Russia can have any number of nuclear suitcases and nuclear buttons, but since the 500 billion dollars of the Russian elite are in our banks, you still figure it out: is it your elite or already ours? I don’t see a single situation in which Russia will use its nuclear potential ”

            https://topwar.ru/152222-denacionalizacija-jelity.html
            1. Dear sofa expert. 2 May 2020 20: 32
              +2
              • 2
              • 0
              ... Are you sure you have enough determination? ..

              Some kind of inappropriate question. Russian doctrine today does not involve preventive strikes. But as a retaliatory strike on aggression - of course, there is enough determination. How else? Brzezinski can wag his tongue as much as he wants (wanted). If you do not know what authority the captain of an underwater strategic missile carrier has, then at least understand a simple thing: he does not belong to the "elite" that you are hinting about.
              The boat will emerge (or throw away the buoy), will not hear the special “hang up” command, and this will be an order for the captain to free all launch mines on board the boat for predetermined purposes. This is one of the many possibilities of an inevitable retaliatory strike.
              1. Digital error Offline
                Digital error (Eugene) 2 May 2020 21: 50
                0
                • 1
                • 1
                Quote: Dear couch expert.
                If you do not know what authority the captain of an underwater strategic missile carrier has, then at least understand a simple thing: he does not belong to the "elite"

                If you have a link to the possibility of a retaliatory nuclear strike without the approval of the "elite", I will be grateful and will take my doubts back. This is the first. Second, how many captains of nuclear submarines will take responsibility for a nuclear war without approval from above? Let me remind you of today's realities - if I remember correctly, Putin promised the governors up to 7 years in prison for failure in the fight against coronavirus. Do you think that this sword of Damocles will contribute to true statistics about the incidence coming from the regions to the federal center?
                1. Dear sofa expert. 2 May 2020 23: 44
                  0
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  Well, what can I tell you? Look for the links you need if you cannot understand the obvious.
                  The underwater service, by its nature, is conducted at a considerable distance and with very limited communication capabilities, so the submarine commander has quite a lot of freedom to choose actions based on his own information received at remote positions. There is a certain warning system for submarine commanders about the need to take certain measures. All directives and keys necessary for making important decisions, right up to the outbreak of hostilities, are on board strategic submarines. This freedom of action allows the submarine commander to quickly make decisions in a rapidly changing environment.
                  And in general, would you decide whether you want a literacy program on a submarine, or Putin to troll?
                  1. Digital error Offline
                    Digital error (Eugene) 3 May 2020 00: 15
                    +1
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    Quote: Dear couch expert.
                    All directives and keys necessary for making important decisions, right up to the outbreak of hostilities, are on board strategic submarines

                    I hope so, otherwise there will be no “containment”.

                    Quote: Dear couch expert.
                    or Putin troll?

                    I want to spend it on a well-deserved rest. By democratic methods. If trolling is suitable for this - let it be so - the law is not prohibited.
                    1. Dear sofa expert. 3 May 2020 00: 35
                      -1
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      All directives and keys necessary for making important decisions, right up to the outbreak of hostilities, are on board strategic submarines.

                      I hope so, otherwise there will be no "deterrence" ..

                      Well. As the saying goes: Hope dies last. It’s not cold for me - it’s not hot. And here:

                      ... I want to spend it on a well-deserved rest. By democratic methods. If trolling is suitable for this - let it be so - the law is not prohibited ..

                      This is more serious.

                      ... Trolling is a form of social provocation or bullying in network communication, used by both personalized participants interested in greater recognition, publicity, shocking, and anonymous users without the possibility of their identification.

                      It is not easy to find a direct analogy from ordinary life for the trolling phenomenon. The nearest concepts are temptation, provocation and incitement - that is, deliberate deception, slander, incitement of quarrels and discord, a call for unseemly actions ..

                      Wikipedia

                      That is, you are now publicly, and most importantly, without a twinge of conscience, called yourself:
                      - provocateur
                      - instigator
                      - a deceiver
                      - slanderer
                      - the causative agent of quarrels and strife.
                      Also. openly calling for unseemly actions?
                      And you think that with such "democratic" methods you can defend your political convictions? Yes, with impunity!)
                      Yes, you are out of your mind, my friend.
                      I hope you understand why most support Putin, and not those like you?
                      1. Digital error Offline
                        Digital error (Eugene) 3 May 2020 00: 45
                        +1
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        Quote: Dear couch expert.
                        That is, you are now publicly, and most importantly, without a twinge of conscience, called yourself:

                        No, you called me that. Note - I did not admit to trolling - I did not exclude it as a method. Inconvenient questions - also trolling? wink

                        Quote: Dear couch expert.
                        ... do you think that with such "democratic" methods can you defend your political beliefs?

                        Ask uncomfortable questions? This is a kind of agitation, and it is prohibited only on the day before and on the day of voting. And while a dictatorship has not been constitutionally introduced instead of democracy, I intend to use it. smile

                        Quote: Dear couch expert.
                        I hope you understand why most support Putin, and not people like you?

                        Of course I understand. "Nuclear Electorate" - these are women 50+. It was they who were given special attention in the speech of the guarantor of 30.08.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX - look at it again. The rest - “if only there was no war” and “they added a thousand to my pension” (it turned out that not everyone, but the main thing - to promise in time. wink ) And I’m still young, I’m “16 years of stability” - a ticket to old age without hope for me or for posterity.
                        And by the way - you are off topic. Do you have any answers?

                        Quote: DigitalError
                        how many captains of nuclear submarines will take responsibility for a nuclear war without approval from above?

                        Quote: DigitalError
                        Will this sword of Damocles contribute to true statistics on incidence coming from the regions to the federal center?
                      2. Dear sofa expert. 3 May 2020 00: 49
                        0
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        And while a dictatorship has not been constitutionally introduced instead of democracy, I intend to use it.

                        That is, you now confirm that in Russia under Putin there is democracy, and you use it?
                      3. Digital error Offline
                        Digital error (Eugene) 3 May 2020 00: 54
                        0
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        Quote: Dear couch expert.
                        you now confirm that in Russia under Putin there is democracy, and you use it?

                        Naturally - why do I need it if I do not use it? Do not like it - do not vote smile

                        The parliamentary majority, having realized its advantage in voting, bears the risk of losing electoral support and voter confidence in view of the possible negative consequences of legislative decisions. This, in particular, manifests itself in political and, in particular, parliamentary and party competition based on the principles of democracy, legal democracy and political pluralism.

                        This is from the definition of the Constitutional Court on the "constitutionality of pension reform." A call to action, so to speak. So I use it - I lost trust in these statesmen forever.
                        You intentionally do not answer double-asked questions? In that case too, I will not answer you. hi
                      4. Dear sofa expert. 3 May 2020 01: 09
                        0
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        ... you intentionally do not answer double-asked questions? In that case too, I will not answer you.

                        So no one insists. Communication with the troll, and even of puberty, was not my priority initially).
                      5. Digital error Offline
                        Digital error (Eugene) 3 May 2020 01: 15
                        -1
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        Quote: Dear couch expert.
                        Yes, even puberty

                        laughing Cool argument. laughing So do not react anymore to the "bowel movement trolls" - I surrendered to you ... lol
                        But Sobyanin considers it necessary to respond:

                      6. Dear sofa expert. 3 May 2020 01: 22
                        0
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        No, no, you misunderstood me again. To react or not, or how, I decide for myself) Boomerang is a cool thing.
                      7. Digital error Offline
                        Digital error (Eugene) 3 May 2020 01: 25
                        -1
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        Quote: Dear couch expert.
                        you misunderstood me again

                        Here is some ignoramus. Goodnight. hi
                  2. Digital error Offline
                    Digital error (Eugene) 3 May 2020 01: 17
                    +1
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    Quote: Dear couch expert.
                    still puberty

                    By the way, Kiriyenko and other statesmen are actively working with youth. Do you think the retirees are also mistaken? lol

            2. Dear sofa expert. 3 May 2020 00: 53
              0
              • 0
              • 0
              Digital error

              Will this sword of Damocles contribute to true statistics on incidence coming from the regions to the federal center?

              And you, it seems, in the subject)) What is this about?
            3. Digital error Offline
              Digital error (Eugene) 3 May 2020 01: 09
              0
              • 1
              • 1
              Quote: Dear couch expert.
              what is it about?

              This is not an answer, but a question. This is about the fear of governors to lose their "homes". Coronavirus is objective - the more the shift workers from Moscow returned to the region, the greater the incidence - regardless of the will of the governors. And nobody wants to lose their position “due to the loss of trust”.
          2. Dear sofa expert. 3 May 2020 01: 02
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            How many captains of nuclear submarines will take responsibility for a nuclear war without approval from above? ..

            I already answered how I could, but if you are "good to read, but bad to understand," then again. The captain of the submarine is a very responsible person. The submarine can be in a "information vacuum" for a very long time, therefore they have special directives for this. Here is just one example: A submarine, say, for 2 months was “out of reach” (for example, under water). During this time, anything could happen. For example, a war begins. The captain also cannot know this. After surfacing, the boat did not receive a signal, a beacon (well, let's call it conditionally “all is well”). Then the captain acts according to the directive drawn up by him. So what is prescribed to him there, then he will do it.
          3. Digital error Offline
            Digital error (Eugene) 3 May 2020 01: 07
            -1
            • 0
            • 1
            Quote: Dear couch expert.
            Then the captain acts according to the directive drawn up by him

            Plus from me. This is correct and I hope it will always be so.
          4. Dear sofa expert. 3 May 2020 01: 14
            0
            • 0
            • 0
            I don’t understand what is the disagreement? In the directive to the captain of the strategic missile carrier, in case of non-receipt of the signal “everything is good” (and this automatically means “everything is bad”), it will most likely be: Striking back.
  • Winnie Offline
    Winnie (Winnie) 2 May 2020 14: 27
    -3
    • 0
    • 3
    But to send Mace across America from a distance of 500 kilometers, this is a few minutes of flight time.

    You are very hopelessly behind life and the latest technology! Comparing the armed forces of Russia and America is the same as comparing the weapons of the natives and the colonialists. But the leader Pupu with manic persistence will, with foam at his mouth, assert that the "glorified and heroic" tribe will triumph over all. That soon he will have "hyper-spears" and "space bows." It remains only to wait 2, 5, 10 years. laughing The natives can only believe in these tales and hope that they at least scare someone. lol
    On the subject:

    Submarine officers from Severomorsk plotted the flight path of the Orion American reconnaissance ship on a map of the location of our nuclear submarines during the exercises. And all ten turning points of his route accounted for exactly at the location of our boats. That is, he did not even look for them, but was heading to a specific point. “Orion” went out without any tacks exactly onto our submarine, dropped the buoy and walked to the next one. The scale of the threat from enemy aircraft is not recognized by us, including because domestic anti-submarine aviation is catastrophically behind the foreign level.

    Another scandal flares up in the Russian Ministry of Defense, - Dmitry Chernyshev comments in his LiveJournal. - It turned out that the secrecy of atomic submarines, for which billions of budget funds were spent over the years of the existence of the USSR, and then the Russian Federation, exists only in the heads of admirals. The potential strategic adversary in the person of the United States does not even bother to search for Russian submarines: in some incomprehensible way they are visible to him even so.
    The fact that the secret routes of strategic Russian nuclear submarines are not at all secret for the United States was revealed during recent exercises in the Barents Sea. In essence, this means that, in the event of a global conflict, the entire marine part of the Russian "nuclear triad" can be eliminated with precision missile attacks almost instantly: they won’t even have time to put the submarines into a combat situation.
    How the US manages to accomplish this task - the Russian military does not yet understand. Obviously, we are talking about some kind of satellite technology that allows Americans to track Russian nuclear submarines even at great depths. However, the fact remains: they are all visible in the Pentagon to the nearest meter, and, in the event of the outbreak of a major war, they will be instantly destroyed before they launch nuclear missiles.
    1. 321 Offline
      321 (321) 2 May 2020 14: 55
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      Quote: Winnie
      ... You are very hopelessly behind life and the latest technology! Comparing the Armed Forces of Russia and America is the same as comparing the weapons of the natives and the colonialists. ...

      So no one asked you, iksperd, to compare, or even try to be clever, no one asked you either - here again they rub about “instantly”, or rather, try - nu-nu, dream on and on - you almost didn’t know nothing about the whole system, and now you know nothing - "instantly" - still not tired of writing your own dregs, especially about what you don’t know about? bully
      1. Winnie Offline
        Winnie (Winnie) 17 May 2020 20: 19
        -1
        • 0
        • 1
        even try to be clever, nobody asked you either

        Do you think that the stupid are in the Ministry of Defense? What kind of "patriot" are you after? laughing laughing laughing
        1. 321 Offline
          321 (321) 19 May 2020 22: 57
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          Quote: Winnie
          even try to be clever, nobody asked you either

          Do you think that the stupid are in the Ministry of Defense? What kind of "patriot" are you after? laughing laughing laughing

          I'm not going to share my opinion with you and your colleagues - I do not trust you ... laughing
    2. Dear sofa expert. 2 May 2020 20: 43
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Delusions of a teenager from the city of Vatutino)
  • Dear sofa expert. April 26 2020 23: 48
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    ... tests of the "Mace" were carried out 19 times - and only 11 of them were successful ..

    Sure of the numbers? The number of starts - 34. Successful - 27. Unsuccessful - 7.
  • 69 Offline
    69 April 26 2020 13: 50
    +4
    • 4
    • 0
    Quote: Winnie
    You want to say that Russia will attack first

    Nobody will attack you, but they will hit you on time, be sure.
    1. Winnie Offline
      Winnie (Winnie) 17 May 2020 21: 08
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      But what about the "empty mines"? Where are the missiles that were there?