"The Polish pilot clearly got his pants dirty": Bulgarians about the meeting of the F-16 with the Russian Su-35


The Bulgarian edition of Facts drew attention to a video that appeared several days ago in the Russian segment of Youtube. On it, the Polish F-16 fighter approached a close distance to the Russian IL-38 anti-submarine aircraft, but the Su-35 of the Russian Air Force was driven off.


At the same time, the Polish combat aircraft released the landing gear. This sign in the aviation environment means a forced landing at the specified aerodrome.

"Reporter" previously described this incident. in details.

In the context of this event, comments of the Bulgarian audience are noteworthy. Bulgaria, as you know, has been a NATO member since 2004, and since 2007 it has been a member of the European Union.


He (the Polish pilot) put on his pants, in a word

- comments one of the readers.

The Polish pilot in a panic, realizing his helplessness, clearly stained the diaper

- echoes another.

The Poles are only bold in words, but how it comes to business ...

- appreciated the Polish courage Bulgarian reader.

Lost the chassis? In fact, the Pole meant that he gives up and takes off his pants!

- the user of the Facts website put forward an assumption.

This “scrap metal” F-16 had no chance against the super-maneuverable Su-35

- one of the readers is sure.

Yes, landing gear really means landing, but not in international airspace. The cruising speed of the IL-38 is about 450 km / h. For an F-16 fighter, such a speed at an altitude of 5000 meters is uncomfortable. Probably, the pilot released the landing gear to better hold the plane

- put forward the theory of the Bulgarian user.

From ourselves, however, we note that the landing gear opposite, on the contrary, increases the resistance of the aircraft to the incoming air flow, which means that it worsens the aerodynamic qualities and slows down the aircraft even more.

It is noteworthy that there are really a lot of similar anti-Polish comments on the Facts website, which makes us wonder - what is the reason for such a negative attitude of the Bulgarians towards the Poles? Both countries are members of the European Union and NATO. It would seem - allies, and not the first time. In the past, both states were part of the Warsaw block.

Apparently, things are really going badly in the “European house” and the misunderstanding between the countries will only intensify.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

21 comment
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Panting Offline
    Panting (Vyacheslav) April 17 2020 10: 24
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    And how much a joyful stench would be if a lisp, on top of everything else, would also crash to the ground-th-th!
  2. Alexzn Offline
    Alexzn (Alexander) April 17 2020 10: 34
    +2
    • 6
    • 4
    There was a regular staff interception, the release of the chassis was associated with the problem of stability at low speed. Arranging a circus from a normal situation at the level of who and how did it, is silly.
    1. gorenina91 Offline
      gorenina91 (Irina) April 17 2020 10: 51
      -5
      • 4
      • 9
      There was a regular staff interception, the release of the chassis was associated with the problem of stability at low speed. Arranging a circus from a normal situation at the level of who and how did it, is silly.

      - So it is accepted ... - this is a "site genre" ... You simply violate "traditions" and "rules" by your remark ...- Hahah ...
  3. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) April 17 2020 10: 45
    -6
    • 0
    • 6
    Yes, landing gear really means landing, but not in international airspace. The cruising speed of the IL-38 is about 450 km / h. For an F-16 fighter, such a speed at an altitude of 5000 meters is uncomfortable. Probably, the pilot released the landing gear to better hold the plane

    - at least someone literate was caught, in contrast to the rest of the idiots. And were they Bulgarians?


    1. Kristallovich Online
      Kristallovich (Ruslan) April 17 2020 11: 23
      +3
      • 4
      • 1
      at least someone literate was caught, unlike the rest of the idiots.

      What is literacy?
  4. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) April 17 2020 13: 32
    -4
    • 1
    • 5
    And, it was already .... crap, everyone continues to suck ....
    Now, it turns out, the SU-35 drove away ...

    The fact that F even released the chassis in order to equalize the speeds (it can be seen that he barely keeps swaying so as not to overtake) and, apparently, take a selfie ...
    It can be seen that it was difficult to drive off a barely flying F, and even going down after a selfie to a decline ....
    With all his might for 15-20 seconds. drove the roller ... with aerobatics and overloads ...
    Bulgarian Commentators happily in the purely Russian language are hooting ....
    1. Kristallovich Online
      Kristallovich (Ruslan) April 17 2020 16: 23
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      The fact that F even released the chassis to even the speed

      Something new. There is an air brake for this. On Russian planes, it is usually located behind the lamp, specifically on the F-16 on both sides of the nozzle.
      1. Sergey Latyshev Offline
        Sergey Latyshev (Serge) April 17 2020 17: 41
        -2
        • 1
        • 3
        Everything can be, but!
        As I know, this is a "parachute in miniature" - for landing, and so that it is pressed to the ground ... the latter is not comme il faut.

        And here you can see - he released - he leveled off at barely speed - he flew a bit (in the most advantageous place for the photo - you can see the engines, the noses of the aircraft) - removed the landing gear - began to overtake with a decrease (the pictures were taken) ...
        Maybe later on the radio and thanked for the selfie, but this, the stump is clear, was hidden ....

        It’s the most to posoboskalit and overthrow the hats !!!!
        1. Kristallovich Online
          Kristallovich (Ruslan) April 17 2020 21: 12
          +3
          • 4
          • 1
          You are wrong. The air brake is also used at altitude when it is necessary to drastically slow down the flight speed. Here, for example, our Su-27 approaches the patrol P-3.



          And the use of the chassis to slow down is, in principle, prohibited by the instructions. Free flow can damage the racks.
          1. Sergey Latyshev Offline
            Sergey Latyshev (Serge) April 17 2020 23: 00
            -3
            • 0
            • 3
            That Su, then F.
            The bottom line is to reduce the speed to a minimum, with a small initial ..
            At the salons let out, without sitting down, and nothing.

            On F it is visible that something sways right from slowness. At Su, the flight is smoother and more confident, rather the speed is greater.

            Look below, Igor Aviator also has an explanation, only in more detail and with technical details.
            1. Kristallovich Online
              Kristallovich (Ruslan) April 18 2020 10: 19
              +2
              • 2
              • 0
              Salons are released as a precaution. Flights take place at low altitudes. For Igor Aviator, the comment boils down to the fact that the chassis is released by automation. To deliberately extinguish speed with stances - this is nonsense of the insane. To do this, there is an air brake that will cope with the task faster and more efficiently. This is the same as working with a handbrake, while there is a working brake pedal. And no efficiency, and the handbrake itself can be broken.
              1. Sergey Latyshev Offline
                Sergey Latyshev (Serge) April 18 2020 11: 47
                -2
                • 0
                • 2
                In general, it is necessary to ask the pilot, what for the chassis produced.
                1) take a selfie;
                2) show yourself as an idiot, confused the button;
                3) decided to knock grandmas off the media order so that those weeks would suck comments?

                In favor of the 1st, it still testifies that this is not the only video at low speeds where the aircraft are released, then the landing gear is removed.
  5. maiman61 Offline
    maiman61 (Yuri) April 17 2020 14: 27
    +2
    • 3
    • 1
    ... what is the reason for such a negative attitude of the Bulgarians towards the Poles?

    - and who treats them well?
  6. dubovitskiy.1947 (Victor) April 17 2020 19: 12
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Quote: AlexZN
    There was a regular staff interception, the release of the chassis was associated with the problem of stability at low speed. Arranging a circus from a normal situation at the level of who and how did it, is silly.

    If you are a specialist in aviation, tell me how the released chassis can help, slowing down the speed and introducing unpredictable flows of air flow around it, to increase flight stability?
    1. Ibuprofen Offline
      Ibuprofen (Novel) April 19 2020 02: 13
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      Why is it unpredictable? F-16 on the conveyor for several decades, thousands of pieces released. All flight features are calculated, I think, to the smallest detail.
      In addition, there is no need to predict anything from a plane with an emf. The computer will do everything.
      Chassis, most likely, automatically released along with the flaps. The plane is pretty smart. Perhaps there is no way to release separately. There is only some standard landing configuration for flights at speeds lower than, say, 300-400 km / h.
  7. Igor Aviator Offline
    Igor Aviator (Igor Aviator) April 17 2020 19: 15
    +5
    • 6
    • 1
    Quote: Sergey Latyshev
    And here you can see - he released - he evened out barely speed - he flew a bit (in the most advantageous place for the photo - you can see the engines, the noses of the aircraft) - he removed the landing gear - he began to overtake with a decrease

    I will explain to those who are "not in the subject." The F-16 was designed, in general, very successfully - both the integrated design, and the engine are not bad, and the aerodynamics, it seems, are up to the mark ... That's where VERY "missed", I would say, engineers at General Dynamics "messed up", so it is in the desire to save on a controlled air intake. As a result, they have what WE HAVE them. To ensure the possibility of flying at speeds of about 500 km / h, the pilot is forced to set engine speeds at which the power plant does not have gas-dynamic stability due to the lack of control of the air intake. (By the way, at supersonic speeds, that's why Falcon often has an engine surge). In contrast, all of our aircraft are equipped with controlled air intakes that provide gas-dynamic stability of the power plant in the entire range of speeds and altitudes.
    In this case, at the altitude and speed that our IL-38 and SU-35 fly, according to which the Falcon pilot sets the throttle speed to fly evenly, the F-16 engine is "choked". To avoid this, the pilot is forced to set higher revs, which leads to an undesirable, in this case, speed set, which, AGAIN, has to be fought with already using aerodynamic braking - releasing brake flaps or landing gear, which leads to a decrease in already AERODYNAMIC stability. In this mode, especially with PTB, the F-16, in terms of piloting quality, is close to a pregnant penguin.
    Moreover, during the years of my service, information passed that in such a situation, the F-16 airborne complex interferes with flight control by releasing the chassis, based on the value of the instrument speed, the position of the flaps and throttle, in order to “ensure the safety” of the flight, considering these flight conditions close to the landing, regardless of the desire of the pilot. Which once again explains the categorical reluctance of the Americans to take PUBLIC participation in training air battles with our MiG-29, SU-27, and of course - with the SU-35!
    And to top it off, it was commonplace for our SU-27 pilots to fly in international airspace to “troll” F-16 pilots if they suddenly intended to “accompany” our planes. Usually, they had enough patience for 5 minutes, after which they sharply “forced” preferred to wash off.
  8. Winnie Offline
    Winnie (Winnie) April 18 2020 03: 05
    -5
    • 1
    • 6
    What is the reason for such a negative attitude of the Bulgarians towards the Poles?

    There are 500 Russians living in Bulgaria who have a negative attitude towards both Putin and the Poles.
  9. gore Offline
    gore (Alexander) April 18 2020 05: 37
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    I read the comments and I got the impression that the best of the best in the field of world aircraft manufacturing, as well as military aircraft testers of ALL TYPES AND TYPES, have gathered here ...
  10. Istist Offline
    Istist (Ivan) April 18 2020 09: 07
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    From ourselves, however, we note that the landing gear opposite, on the contrary, increases the resistance of the aircraft to the incoming air flow, which means that it worsens the aerodynamic qualities and slows down the aircraft even more.

    He for that chassis also let out to fly more slowly, at "comfortable work of engines".
    Why would he try to forcefully land a plane if he knows very well that the 35th is flying nearby. And then also blame ..
  11. dubovitskiy.1947 (Victor) April 19 2020 11: 13
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    Quote: IbuProPro
    Why is it unpredictable? F-16 on the conveyor for several decades, thousands of pieces released. All flight features are calculated, I think, to the smallest detail.
    In addition, there is no need to predict anything from a plane with an emf. The computer will do everything.
    Chassis, most likely, automatically released along with the flaps. The plane is pretty smart. Perhaps there is no way to release separately. There is only some standard landing configuration for flights at speeds lower than, say, 300-400 km / h.

    But what, air flows around the chassis elements with a laminar flow, easily formalized, and, therefore, incorporated into the algorithm control program? Or there are always unpredictable components, for example, speeds in the lateral direction, speeds at different heights (difference in densities), etc. The CAM computer will not be able to do anything. It is a pity that you do not understand such a simple truth. He CAN (and that is not a fact) do only what is laid down in the program. And this can only be done by man. Unless, of course, knows what to push there.
  12. dubovitskiy.1947 (Victor) April 19 2020 11: 14
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    Quote: Winnie
    What is the reason for such a negative attitude of the Bulgarians towards the Poles?

    There are 500 Russians living in Bulgaria who have a negative attitude towards both Putin and the Poles.

    There are 146 million people living in Russia, negatively referring to the Bulgarians, the Poles, and their compatriots who betrayed their homeland.